26 results on '"Y-Ling Chi"'
Search Results
2. Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review
- Author
-
Nuru Saadi, Y-Ling Chi, Srobana Ghosh, Rosalind M. Eggo, Ciara V. McCarthy, Matthew Quaife, Jeanette Dawa, Mark Jit, and Anna Vassall
- Subjects
COVID-19, Vaccination, Mathematical modelling ,Medicine - Abstract
Abstract Background How best to prioritise COVID-19 vaccination within and between countries has been a public health and an ethical challenge for decision-makers globally. We reviewed epidemiological and economic modelling evidence on population priority groups to minimise COVID-19 mortality, transmission, and morbidity outcomes. Methods We searched the National Institute of Health iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (a database of peer-reviewed and pre-print articles), Econlit, the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and the National Bureau of Economic Research for mathematical modelling studies evaluating the impact of prioritising COVID-19 vaccination to population target groups. The first search was conducted on March 3, 2021, and an updated search on the LMIC literature was conducted from March 3, 2021, to September 24, 2021. We narratively synthesised the main study conclusions on prioritisation and the conditions under which the conclusions changed. Results The initial search identified 1820 studies and 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The updated search on LMIC literature identified 7 more studies. 43 studies in total were narratively synthesised. 74% of studies described outcomes in high-income countries (single and multi-country). We found that for countries seeking to minimise deaths, prioritising vaccination of senior adults was the optimal strategy and for countries seeking to minimise cases the young were prioritised. There were several exceptions to the main conclusion, notably that reductions in deaths could be increased if groups at high risk of both transmission and death could be further identified. Findings were also sensitive to the level of vaccine coverage. Conclusion The evidence supports WHO SAGE recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation. There is, however, an evidence gap on optimal prioritisation for low- and middle-income countries, studies that included an economic evaluation, and studies that explore prioritisation strategies if the aim is to reduce overall health burden including morbidity.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The journey to UHC: how well are vertical programmes integrated in the health benefits package? A scoping review
- Author
-
David Wilson, Kalipso Chalkidou, Y-Ling Chi, and Lydia Regan
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,R5-920 ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Background Countries are recommended to progressively work towards universal health coverage (UHC), and to make explicit choices regarding the expansion of priority services. However, there is little guidance on how to manage the inclusion of vertical programmes, funded by external partners, in health benefits packages (HBP) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).Objective We conducted a scoping review to map the inclusion of six vertical programmes (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, contraceptives, immunisation) in 26 LMICs.Methods We identified 26 LMICs with an HBP that was not aspirational (eg, with evidence of implementation or funding). For each HBP, we collected information on the corresponding UHC scheme, health financing at the time of establishment, revisions since inception and entitlements. For each vertical programme, we developed a list of tracer interventions based on the Disease Control Priorities 3 and the 100 Core Health Indicators List. We then used this list of tracer interventions to map the coverage of the six vertical programmes.Results The review shows that there is no common starting point for countries embarking into UHC. Some HBPs were almost three decades old. Whole package revisions are rare. The inclusion of vertical programme does not follow a given pattern based on health financing indicators or country’s income group. Maternal child health services are the most often included and family planning the least. Six countries in our sample covered all vertical programmes, while one covered only one of six.Conclusions This review has shown that there has been a long history of countries facing this question and we have provided the first mapping of inclusion of vertical programmes in UHC. The results of the mapping can inform decisions in countries embarking in UHC.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Measuring Health Outcomes in HIV: Time to Bring in the Patient Experience
- Author
-
Niki O’Brien, Y-Ling Chi, and Karolin R. Krause
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Introduction:Over the past decade, the global response to HIV has led to a reduction in the number of new infections, and a decrease in associated mortality. Yet, the number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is high, with an estimated 38 million infected worldwide. As HIV shifts from being an acute terminal illness to a chronic condition, evaluating programmatic responses to HIV with sole reliance on biological markers (such as viral load or CD4 cell count) as proxies for patient health may no longer be suitable. HIV affects the lives of those infected in myriad ways which should be reflected in programme evaluations by measuring health-related quality of life, in addition to biomarkers. Discussion:In this commentary we argue that there is a pressing need to review how a “good” health outcome is defined and measured in light of care systems moving towards value-based frameworks that measure value in terms of the actual health outcomes achieved (rather than processes of care), global response shifting to providing long-term care for PLHIV in the community, and integrating HIV as part of universal health coverage plans. Efforts should be directed towards validating generic and disease specific patient reported measures of PLHIV, to identify the most suitable tools. Such efforts will ensure that patient experience is appropriately captured, especially to be used in programme or economic evaluations. Conclusions:It is only by recognising and measuring the full range of health, mental and social outcomes related to the disease that the health status of PLHIV can be fully understood.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. What next after GDP-based cost-effectiveness thresholds? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi, Mark Blecher, Kalipso Chalkidou, Anthony Culyer, Karl Claxton, Ijeoma Edoka, Amanda Glassman, Noemi Kreif, Iain Jones, Andrew J. Mirelman, Mardiati Nadjib, Alec Morton, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Jessica Ochalek, Shankar Prinja, Francis Ruiz, Yot Teerawattananon, Anna Vassall, and Alexander Winch
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
Public payers around the world are increasingly using cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) to assess the value-for-money of an intervention and make coverage decisions. However, there is still much confusion about the meaning and uses of the CET, how it should be calculated, and what constitutes an adequate evidence base for its formulation. One widely referenced and used threshold in the last decade has been the 1-3 GDP per capita, which is often attributed to the Commission on Macroeconomics and WHO guidelines on Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). For many reasons, however, this threshold has been widely criticised; which has led experts across the world, including the WHO, to discourage its use. This has left a vacuum for policy-makers and technical staff at a time when countries are wanting to move towards Universal Health Coverage. This article seeks to address this gap by offering five practical options for decision-makers in low- and middle-income countries that can be used instead of the 1-3 GDP rule, to combine existing evidence with fair decision-rules or develop locally relevant CETs. It builds on existing literature as well as an engagement with a group of experts and decision-makers working in low, middle and high income countries.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Why cost-effectiveness thresholds for global health donors should differ from thresholds for Ministries of Health (and why it matters) [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
- Author
-
Tom Drake, Y-Ling Chi, Alec Morton, and Catherine Pitt
- Subjects
Opinion Article ,Articles ,Global health ,health financing ,aid ,priority-setting ,cost-effectiveness ,threshold - Abstract
Healthcare cost-effectiveness analysis is increasingly used to inform priority-setting in low- and middle-income countries and by global health donors. As part of such analyses, cost-effectiveness thresholds are commonly used to determine what is, or is not, cost-effective. Recent years have seen a shift in best practice from a rule-of-thumb 1x or 3x per capita GDP threshold towards using thresholds that, in theory, reflect the opportunity cost of new investments within a given country. In this paper, we observe that international donors face both different resource constraints and opportunity costs compared to national decision-makers. Hence, their perspective on cost-effectiveness thresholds must be different. We discuss the potential implications of distinguishing between national and donor thresholds and outline broad options for how to approach setting a donor-perspective threshold. Further work is needed to clarify healthcare cost-effectiveness threshold theory in the context of international aid and to develop practical policy frameworks for implementation.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Evaluating Large Language Models for Public Health Classification and Extraction Tasks.
- Author
-
Joshua Harris, Timothy Laurence, Leo Loman, Fan Grayson, Toby Nonnenmacher, Harry Long, Loes WalsGriffith, Amy Douglas, Holly Fountain, Stelios Georgiou, Jo Hardstaff, Kathryn Hopkins, Y.-Ling Chi, Galena Kuyumdzhieva, Lesley Larkin, Samuel Collins, Hamish Mohammed, Thomas Finnie, Luke Hounsome, and Steven Riley
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Why cost-effectiveness thresholds for global health donors differ from thresholds for Ministries of Health (and why it matters) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
- Author
-
Tom Drake, Y-Ling Chi, Alec Morton, and Catherine Pitt
- Subjects
Opinion Article ,Articles ,Global health ,health financing ,aid ,priority-setting ,cost-effectiveness ,threshold - Abstract
Healthcare cost-effectiveness analysis is increasingly used to inform priority-setting in low- and middle-income countries and by global health donors. As part of such analyses, cost-effectiveness thresholds are commonly used to determine what is, or is not, cost-effective. Recent years have seen a shift in best practice from a rule-of-thumb 1x or 3x per capita GDP threshold towards using thresholds that, in theory, reflect the opportunity cost of new investments within a given country. In this paper, we observe that international donors face both different resource constraints and opportunity costs compared to national decision makers. Hence, their perspective on cost-effectiveness thresholds must be different. We discuss the potential implications of distinguishing between national and donor thresholds and outline broad options for how to approach setting a donor-perspective threshold. Further work is needed to clarify healthcare cost-effectiveness threshold theory in the context of international aid and to develop practical policy frameworks for implementation.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review
- Author
-
Jeanette Dawa, Y-Ling Chi, Nuru Saadi, Srobana Ghosh, Anna Vassall, Ciara V McCarthy, Matthew Quaife, Rosalind M Eggo, and Mark Jit
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,COVID-19 Vaccines ,COVID-19, Vaccination, Mathematical modelling ,Population ,Review ,EconLit ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Environmental health ,0502 economics and business ,Epidemiology ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Public health ,05 social sciences ,Vaccination ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,3. Good health ,Economic evaluation ,Portfolio ,050211 marketing ,Public Health ,business ,Inclusion (education) - Abstract
Background How best to prioritise COVID-19 vaccination within and between countries has been a public health and an ethical challenge for decision-makers globally. We reviewed epidemiological and economic modelling evidence on population priority groups to minimise COVID-19 mortality, transmission, and morbidity outcomes. Methods We searched the National Institute of Health iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (a database of peer-reviewed and pre-print articles), Econlit, the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and the National Bureau of Economic Research for mathematical modelling studies evaluating the impact of prioritising COVID-19 vaccination to population target groups. The first search was conducted on March 3, 2021, and an updated search on the LMIC literature was conducted from March 3, 2021, to September 24, 2021. We narratively synthesised the main study conclusions on prioritisation and the conditions under which the conclusions changed. Results The initial search identified 1820 studies and 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The updated search on LMIC literature identified 7 more studies. 43 studies in total were narratively synthesised. 74% of studies described outcomes in high-income countries (single and multi-country). We found that for countries seeking to minimise deaths, prioritising vaccination of senior adults was the optimal strategy and for countries seeking to minimise cases the young were prioritised. There were several exceptions to the main conclusion, notably that reductions in deaths could be increased if groups at high risk of both transmission and death could be further identified. Findings were also sensitive to the level of vaccine coverage. Conclusion The evidence supports WHO SAGE recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation. There is, however, an evidence gap on optimal prioritisation for low- and middle-income countries, studies that included an economic evaluation, and studies that explore prioritisation strategies if the aim is to reduce overall health burden including morbidity.
- Published
- 2021
10. Recalibrating the notion of modelling for policymaking during pandemics
- Author
-
Yot Teerawattananon, Sarin KC, Y.-Ling Chi, Saudamini Dabak, Joseph Kazibwe, Hannah Clapham, Claudia Lopez Hernandez, Gabriel M. Leung, Hamid Sharifi, Mahlet Habtemariam, Mark Blecher, Sania Nishtar, Swarup Sarkar, David Wilson, Kalipso Chalkidou, Marelize Gorgens, Raymond Hutubessy, and Suwit Wibulpolprasert
- Subjects
Infectious Diseases ,Epidemiology ,Virology ,Health Policy ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,COVID-19 ,Humans ,Parasitology ,Policy Making ,Microbiology ,Pandemics - Abstract
COVID-19 disease models have aided policymakers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) with many critical decisions. Many challenges remain surrounding their use, from inappropriate model selection and adoption, inadequate and untimely reporting of evidence, to the lack of iterative stakeholder engagement in policy formulation and deliberation. These issues can contribute to the misuse of models and hinder effective policy implementation. Without guidance on how to address such challenges, the true potential of such models may not be realised. The COVID-19 Multi-Model Comparison Collaboration (CMCC) was formed to address this gap. CMCC is a global collaboration between decision-makers from LMICs, modellers and researchers, and development partners. To understand the limitations of existing COVID-19 disease models (primarily from high income countries) and how they could be adequately support decision-making in LMICs, a desk review of modelling experience during the COVID-19 and past disease outbreaks, two online surveys, and regular online consultations were held among the collaborators. Three key recommendations from CMCC include: A 'fitness-for-purpose' flowchart, a tool that concurrently walks policymakers (or their advisors) and modellers through a model selection and development process. The flowchart is organised around the following: policy aims, modelling feasibility, model implementation, model reporting commitment. Holmdahl and Buckee (2020) A 'reporting standards trajectory', which includes three gradually increasing standard of reports, 'minimum', 'acceptable', and 'ideal', and seeks collaboration from funders, modellers, and decision-makers to enhance the quality of reports over time and accountability of researchers. Malla et al. (2018) A framework for "collaborative modelling for effective policy implementation and evaluation" which extends the definition of stakeholders to funders, ground-level implementers, public, and other researchers, and outlines how each can contribute to modelling. We advocate for standardisation of modelling processes and adoption of country-owned model through iterative stakeholder participation and discuss how they can enhance trust, accountability, and public ownership to decisions.
- Published
- 2021
11. Measuring Health Outcomes in HIV: Time to Bring in the Patient Experience
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi, Karolin Krause, and Niki O'Brien
- Subjects
Gerontology ,Value (ethics) ,Chronic condition ,MEDLINE ,HIV Infections ,Disease ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 ,Health outcomes ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Viewpoint ,Patient experience ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,General Medicine ,CD4 Lymphocyte Count ,Patient Outcome Assessment ,Quality of Life ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Viral load - Abstract
Introduction Over the past decade, the global response to HIV has led to a reduction in the number of new infections, and a decrease in associated mortality. Yet, the number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is high, with an estimated 38 million infected worldwide. As HIV shifts from being an acute terminal illness to a chronic condition, evaluating programmatic responses to HIV with sole reliance on biological markers (such as viral load or CD4 cell count) as proxies for patient health may no longer be suitable. HIV affects the lives of those infected in myriad ways which should be reflected in programme evaluations by measuring health-related quality of life, in addition to biomarkers. Discussion In this commentary we argue that there is a pressing need to review how a "good" health outcome is defined and measured in light of care systems moving towards value-based frameworks that measure value in terms of the actual health outcomes achieved (rather than processes of care), global response shifting to providing long-term care for PLHIV in the community, and integrating HIV as part of universal health coverage plans. Efforts should be directed towards validating generic and disease specific patient-reported measures of PLHIV, to identify the most suitable tools. Such efforts will ensure that patient experience is appropriately captured, especially to be used in programme or economic evaluations. Conclusions It is only by recognising and measuring the full range of health, mental and social outcomes related to the disease that the health status of PLHIV can be fully understood.
- Published
- 2021
12. The Use of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds for Evaluating Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries From 2015 to 2020: A Review
- Author
-
Kalipso Chalkidou, Y-Ling Chi, David Wilson, Adrian Gheorghe, Joseph Kazibwe, and Francis Ruiz
- Subjects
Priority setting ,business.industry ,Cost effectiveness ,Health Policy ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Gross Domestic Product ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Psychological intervention ,Disability-Adjusted Life Years ,Decision rule ,World Health Organization ,Gross domestic product ,Low and middle income countries ,Environmental health ,Global health ,Per capita ,Medicine ,Humans ,business ,Developing Countries - Abstract
Objectives Evidence-informed priority setting, in particular cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), can help target resources better to achieve universal health coverage. Central to the application of CEA is the use of a cost-effectiveness threshold. We add to the literature by looking at what thresholds have been used in published CEA and the proportion of interventions found to be cost-effective, by type of threshold. Methods We identified CEA studies in low- and middle-income countries from the Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry that were published between January 1, 2015, and January 6, 2020. We extracted data on the country of focus, type of interventions under consideration, funder, threshold used, and recommendations. Results A total of 230 studies with a total 713 interventions were included in this review; 1 to 3× gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was the most common type of threshold used in judging cost-effectiveness (84.3%). Approximately a third of studies (34.2%) using 1 to 3× GDP per capita applied a threshold at 3× GDP per capita. We have found that no study used locally developed thresholds. We found that 79.3% of interventions received a recommendation as “cost-effective” and that 85.9% of studies had at least 1 intervention that was considered cost-effective. The use of 1 to 3× GDP per capita led to a higher proportion of study interventions being judged as cost-effective compared with other types of thresholds. Conclusions Despite the wide concerns about the use of 1 to 3× GDP per capita, this threshold is still widely used in the literature. Using this threshold leads to more interventions being recommended as “cost-effective.” This study further explore alternatives to the 1 to 3× GDP as a decision rule.
- Published
- 2020
13. What next after GDP-based cost-effectiveness thresholds?
- Author
-
Alexander Winch, Noemi Kreif, Amanda Glassman, Ijeoma Edoka, Kalipso Chalkidou, Mardiati Nadjib, Jessica Ochalek, Y-Ling Chi, Mark Blecher, Anthony J. Culyer, Anna Vassall, Francis Ruiz, Alec Morton, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Shankar Prinja, Andrew J. Mirelman, Iain Jones, Karl Claxton, and Yot Teerawattananon
- Subjects
Cost effectiveness ,Psychological intervention ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Commission ,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous) ,Economics ,Per capita ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Meaning (existential) ,Public economics ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,cost-effectiveness analysis ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,Articles ,Cost-effectiveness thresholds ,priority setting ,Intervention (law) ,health opportunity cost ,HD28 ,Open Letter ,0305 other medical science ,High income countries - Abstract
Public payers around the world are increasingly using cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) to assess the value-for-money of an intervention and make coverage decisions. However, there is still much confusion about the meaning and uses of the CET, how it should be calculated, and what constitutes an adequate evidence base for its formulation. One widely referenced and used threshold in the last decade has been the 1-3 GDP per capita, which is often attributed to the Commission on Macroeconomics and WHO guidelines on Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). For many reasons, however, this threshold has been widely criticised; which has led experts across the world, including the WHO, to discourage its use. This has left a vacuum for policy-makers and technical staff at a time when countries are wanting to move towards Universal Health Coverage. This article seeks to address this gap by offering five practical options for decision-makers in low- and middle-income countries that can be used instead of the 1-3 GDP rule, to combine existing evidence with fair decision-rules or develop locally relevant CETs. It builds on existing literature as well as an engagement with a group of experts and decision-makers working in low, middle and high income countries.
- Published
- 2020
14. The journey to UHC: how well are vertical programmes integrated in the health benefits package? A scoping review
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi, Kalipso Chalkidou, Lydia Regan, and David Wilson
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,Economic growth ,malaria ,Psychological intervention ,Sample (statistics) ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 ,Health benefits ,maternal health ,03 medical and health sciences ,R5-920 ,0302 clinical medicine ,Universal Health Insurance ,Political science ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Child ,Poverty ,Original Research ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,immunisation ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,HIV ,Health indicator ,Work (electrical) ,Family planning ,0305 other medical science ,Delivery of Health Care ,health systems ,Inclusion (education) - Abstract
BackgroundCountries are recommended to progressively work towards universal health coverage (UHC), and to make explicit choices regarding the expansion of priority services. However, there is little guidance on how to manage the inclusion of vertical programmes, funded by external partners, in health benefits packages (HBP) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveWe conducted a scoping review to map the inclusion of six vertical programmes (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, contraceptives, immunisation) in 26 LMICs.MethodsWe identified 26 LMICs with an HBP that was not aspirational (eg, with evidence of implementation or funding). For each HBP, we collected information on the corresponding UHC scheme, health financing at the time of establishment, revisions since inception and entitlements. For each vertical programme, we developed a list of tracer interventions based on the Disease Control Priorities 3 and the 100 Core Health Indicators List. We then used this list of tracer interventions to map the coverage of the six vertical programmes.ResultsThe review shows that there is no common starting point for countries embarking into UHC. Some HBPs were almost three decades old. Whole package revisions are rare. The inclusion of vertical programme does not follow a given pattern based on health financing indicators or country’s income group. Maternal child health services are the most often included and family planning the least. Six countries in our sample covered all vertical programmes, while one covered only one of six.ConclusionsThis review has shown that there has been a long history of countries facing this question and we have provided the first mapping of inclusion of vertical programmes in UHC. The results of the mapping can inform decisions in countries embarking in UHC.
- Published
- 2021
15. Mind the costs, too : towards better cost-effectiveness analyses of PBF programmes
- Author
-
Francis Ruiz, Y-Ling Chi, Sebastian Bauhoff, Kalipso Chalkidou, Itamar Megiddo, Mohamed Gad, and Peter C. Smith
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Cost effectiveness ,MEDLINE ,aid transition ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,RA0421 ,medicine ,Global health ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Budget constraint ,Sustainable development ,Public economics ,Applied economics ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,Public health ,cost-effectiveness analysis ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,performance-based financing ,Commentary ,Business ,0305 other medical science - Abstract
Summary box In the last two decades, performance-based financing (PBF) has gained worldwide prominence. As of September 2016, the Health Results Innovation Trust Fund (HRITF) at the World Bank supported 29 low-income and middle-income countries in the introduction, implementation and evaluation of 35 PBF programmes, with expenditure near $2.5 billion. Although PBF is perceived as a tool to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, several global health experts have pointed to its mixed evidence base.1 In recent years, PBF has become one of the most divisive topics in the global health community, as illustrated by the lively discussions following the publication of Paul et al ’s piece.2 Policy-makers need to assess whether PBF is an appropriate policy choice for their countries, given the substantial budget constraints they face and that are likely to worsen with transition from aid. In practice, whether the investments required to implement PBF are ‘worthwhile’ is a question that can be answered by a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). However, a recent review found no studies making clear connections between the costs and effects of PBF.3 Our search yielded three CEAs …
- Published
- 2018
16. How can we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of health system strengthening? A typology and illustrations
- Author
-
K, Hauck, A, Morton, K, Chalkidou, Y-Ling, Chi, A, Culyer, C, Levin, R, Meacock, M, Over, R, Thomas, A, Vassall, S, Verguet, and P C, Smith
- Subjects
Government Programs ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Humans ,Models, Theoretical ,Delivery of Health Care - Abstract
Health interventions often depend on a complex system of human and capital infrastructure that is shared with other interventions, in the form of service delivery platforms, such as healthcare facilities, hospitals, or community services. Most forms of health system strengthening seek to improve the efficiency or effectiveness of such delivery platforms. This paper presents a typology of ways in which health system strengthening can improve the economic efficiency of health services. Three types of health system strengthening are identified and modelled: (1) investment in the efficiency of an existing shared platform that generates positive benefits across a range of existing interventions; (2) relaxing a capacity constraint of an existing shared platform that inhibits the optimization of existing interventions; (3) providing an entirely new shared platform that supports a number of existing or new interventions. Theoretical models are illustrated with examples, and illustrate the importance of considering the portfolio of interventions using a platform, and not just piecemeal individual analysis of those interventions. They show how it is possible to extend principles of conventional cost-effectiveness analysis to identify an optimal balance between investing in health system strengthening and expenditure on specific interventions. The models developed in this paper provide a conceptual framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of investments in strengthening healthcare systems and, more broadly, shed light on the role that platforms play in promoting the cost-effectiveness of different interventions.
- Published
- 2018
17. Measuring Health Outcomes in HIV: Time to Bring in the Patient Experience.
- Author
-
O’BRIEN, NIKI, Y-LING CHI, and KRAUSE, KAROLIN R.
- Subjects
HIV ,CD4 antigen ,MEDICAL care ,BIOMARKERS ,QUALITY of life - Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, the global response to HIV has led to a reduction in the number of new infections, and a decrease in associated mortality. Yet, the number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is high, with an estimated 38 million infected worldwide. As HIV shifts from being an acute terminal illness to a chronic condition, evaluating programmatic responses to HIV with sole reliance on biological markers (such as viral load or CD4 cell count) as proxies for patient health may no longer be suitable. HIV affects the lives of those infected in myriad ways which should be reflected in programme evaluations by measuring health-related quality of life, in addition to biomarkers. Discussion: In this commentary we argue that there is a pressing need to review how a “good” health outcome is defined and measured in light of care systems moving towards value-based frameworks that measure value in terms of the actual health outcomes achieved (rather than processes of care), global response shifting to providing long-term care for PLHIV in the community, and integrating HIV as part of universal health coverage plans. Efforts should be directed towards validating generic and disease specific patientreported measures of PLHIV, to identify the most suitable tools. Such efforts will ensure that patient experience is appropriately captured, especially to be used in programme or economic evaluations. Conclusions: It is only by recognising and measuring the full range of health, mental and social outcomes related to the disease that the health status of PLHIV can be fully understood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Resource allocation processes at multilateral organizations working in global health
- Author
-
Jesse B. Bump and Y-Ling Chi
- Subjects
Resource mobilization ,Transparency (market) ,International Cooperation ,030231 tropical medicine ,resource allocation ,global health ,Aid effectiveness ,03 medical and health sciences ,Politics ,0302 clinical medicine ,international health policy ,Global health ,Aid ,Humans ,Organizational Objectives ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Plain language ,Public economics ,Health Policy ,1. No poverty ,International Agencies ,Original Articles ,Incentive ,Accountability ,Business - Abstract
International institutions provide well over US$10 billion in development assistance for health (DAH) annually and between 1990 and 2014, DAH disbursements totaled $458 billion but how do they decide who gets what, and for what purpose? In this article, we explore how allocation decisions were made by the nine convening agencies of the Equitable Access Initiative. We provide clear, plain language descriptions of the complete process from resource mobilization to allocation for the nine multilateral agencies with prominent agendas in global health. Then, through a comparative analysis we illuminate the choices and strategies employed in the nine international institutions. We find that resource allocation in all reviewed institutions follow a similar pattern, which we categorized in a framework of five steps: strategy definition, resource mobilization, eligibility of countries, support type and funds allocation. All the reviewed institutions generate resource allocation decisions through well-structured and fairly complex processes. Variations in those processes seem to reflect differences in institutional principles and goals. However, these processes have serious shortcomings. Technical problems include inadequate flexibility to account for or meet country needs. Although aid effectiveness and value for money are commonly referenced, we find that neither performance nor impact is a major criterion for allocating resources. We found very little formal consideration of the incentives generated by allocation choices. Political issues include non-transparent influence on allocation processes by donors and bureaucrats, and the common practice of earmarking funds to bypass the normal allocation process entirely. Ethical deficiencies include low accountability and transparency at international institutions, and limited participation by affected citizens or their representatives. We find that recipient countries have low influence on allocation processes themselves, although within these processes they have some influence in relatively narrow areas.
- Published
- 2017
19. Exposure, Contemporaneousness and the Effect of Droughts on Children's Cognitive Development
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi and Eduardo Fe
- Subjects
Indonesian ,Identification (information) ,Credibility ,Cognitive development ,language ,Endogeneity ,Rural area ,Psychology ,Child development ,language.human_language ,Cognitive psychology ,Term (time) - Abstract
In this paper, we combine a comprehensive Indonesian household survey with detailed meteorological data to explore what can be learned about the effect of drought on the long term cognitive development of Indonesian children living in rural areas. We face a common problem of latent exposure with observable contemporaneousness. The problem is compounded by plausible endogeneity and likely confounding. To estimate the effects of drought on Indonesian children's scores in a fluid intelligence test, we consider a battery of different identification assumptions which vary in credibility and power. Our most powerful assumptions point identify the effect of contemporaneousness, however they have debatable credibility. Our most credible assumptions, on the other hand, convey little information about the effect of contemporaneousness. In between these two extreme, we consider a range of middle-of-the-way assumptions which partially identify the effect of contemporaneousness. Specifically, we characterise some of the assumptions required to establish the sign of the effect of contemporaneousness. Our results reveal differential effects of drought across sexes, however we find at least two competing explanations which would explain these difference: natural selection, on the one hand, and family dis-investing on girls in the fact of hardship, on the other.
- Published
- 2017
20. Paying for Performance in Healthcare: Implications for Health System Performance and Accountability
- Author
-
Cheryl Cashin, Y-Ling Chi, Michael Borowitz, Sarah Thompson, Cheryl Cashin, Y-Ling Chi, Michael Borowitz, and Sarah Thompson
- Subjects
- Medical care, Cost of, Medical economics
- Abstract
Health spending continues to grow faster than the economy in most OECD countries. In 2010, the OECD published a study of strategies to increase value for money in health care, in which pay for performance (P4P) was identified as an innovative tool to improve health system efficiency in several OECD countries.However, evidence that P4P increases value for money, boosts quality of processes in health care, or improves health outcomes is limited.This book explores the many questions surrounding P4P such as whether the potential power of P4P has been over-sold, or whether the disappointing results to date are more likely rooted in problems of design and implementation or inadequate monitoring and evaluation. The book also examines the supporting systems and process, in addition to incentives, that are necessary for P4P to improve provider performance and to drive and sustain improvement.The book utilises a substantial set of case studies from 12 OECD countries to shed light on P4P programs in practice.Featuring both high and middle income countries, cases from primary and acute care settings, and a range of both national and pilot programmes, each case study features: Analysis of the design and implementationdecisions, including the role of stakeholders Critical assessment of objectives versus results Examination of the of'net'impacts, includingpositive spillover effects and unintended consequencesThe detailed analysis of these 12 case studies together with the rest of this critical text highlight the realities of P4P programs and their potential impact on the performance of health systems in a diversity of settings. As a result, this book provides critical insights into the experience to date with P4P and how this tool may be better leveraged to improve health system performance and accountability.This title is in the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series.
- Published
- 2014
21. Who should finance WHO's work on emergencies?
- Author
-
Antoine Flahault, Y-Ling Chi, Jaya Krishnakumar, Dejan Loncar, and Jürgen Maurer
- Subjects
Work (electrical) ,business.industry ,Emergency Medicine ,Financial Support ,Humans ,General Medicine ,Business ,Public relations ,World Health Organization ,ddc:613 - Published
- 2016
22. Resource allocation processes at multilateral organizations working in global health.
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi, Bump, Jesse B., and Chi, Y-Ling
- Subjects
INTERNATIONAL cooperation ,RESOURCE mobilization ,RESOURCE allocation ,MEDICAL care ,ORGAN donors - Abstract
International institutions provide well over US$10 billion in development assistance for health (DAH) annually and between 1990 and 2014, DAH disbursements totaled $458 billion but how do they decide who gets what, and for what purpose? In this article, we explore how allocation decisions were made by the nine convening agencies of the Equitable Access Initiative. We provide clear, plain language descriptions of the complete process from resource mobilization to allocation for the nine multilateral agencies with prominent agendas in global health. Then, through a comparative analysis we illuminate the choices and strategies employed in the nine international institutions. We find that resource allocation in all reviewed institutions follow a similar pattern, which we categorized in a framework of five steps: strategy definition, resource mobilization, eligibility of countries, support type and funds allocation. All the reviewed institutions generate resource allocation decisions through well-structured and fairly complex processes. Variations in those processes seem to reflect differences in institutional principles and goals. However, these processes have serious shortcomings. Technical problems include inadequate flexibility to account for or meet country needs. Although aid effectiveness and value for money are commonly referenced, we find that neither performance nor impact is a major criterion for allocating resources. We found very little formal consideration of the incentives generated by allocation choices. Political issues include non-transparent influence on allocation processes by donors and bureaucrats, and the common practice of earmarking funds to bypass the normal allocation process entirely. Ethical deficiencies include low accountability and transparency at international institutions, and limited participation by affected citizens or their representatives. We find that recipient countries have low influence on allocation processes themselves, although within these processes they have some influence in relatively narrow areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Does the configuration of a primary care system impact on care quality - an exploratory assessment
- Author
-
Gerrard Abi-Aad and Y-Ling Chi
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Primary care ,medicine.disease ,Patient satisfaction ,System impact ,Acute care ,Health care ,medicine ,Quality (business) ,Multiple morbidities ,Medical emergency ,business ,Healthcare system ,media_common - Abstract
Primary health care systems (PHCS) can be highly effective at meeting the healthcare needs of people with chronic or multiple morbidity. Under the right conditions it is also the best setting to assess health more generally and to intervene when health risks are identified. For people with an established chronic disease, primary care is also the natural setting to coordinate care and to ensure that patients receive the right balance of specialist vs. generalist input - care that is effectively coordinated can improve the overall quality of care by minimising the need for unnecessary and costly acute care, and by improving patient satisfaction. But how is it possible to measure the configuration of a health system and how do the essential features of health systems relate to quality of care? This paper provides an overview of how this might be approached and discusses the challenges therein.
- Published
- 2012
24. Rester ou rentrer? La question du retour chez les migrants chinois
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi
- Abstract
En 1986, Herodote publiait un numero intitule « Apres les banlieues rouges ». Ce titre faisait clairement reference a la banlieue parisienne, et plus precisement encore a la Seine-Saint-Denis. Il s’etait impose a l’epoque en raison de la percee inattendue du Front national (FN) sur ces terres communistes, favorisee par les grandes greves tres mediatisees du secteur de l’automobile ou les ouvriers maghrebins etaient tres nombreux et brutalement devenus visibles dans l’espace public.Trente ans plus tard, la situation geopolitique francaise est tout autre. Ce n’est plus seulement le fait que les immigres et leurs descendants soient nombreux dans certaines communes et quartiers qui suscite la mefiance a leur encontre, voire leur rejet par une partie de la population, mais aussi le fait qu’ils soient musulmans, pratiquants ou non. C’est pourquoi la Seine-Saint-Denis, ou ils sont tres nombreux, est le territoire francais le plus concerne par cette situation geopolitique et la facon dont elle sera resolue est essentielle pour le devenir de la nation. Il se peut aussi que les transformations economiques et urbaines de ce departement au cœur de la Metropole du Grand Paris y contribuent positivement.
25. Who should finance WHO's work on emergencies?
- Author
-
Y-Ling Chi, Krishnakumar, Jaya, Maurer, Jürgen, Loncar, Dejan, Flahault, Antoine, and Chi, Y-Ling
- Abstract
The authors discusses the topics at the 68th World Health Assemby of the World Health Organization (WHO), which focus on the approval of a single programme for international funds on outbreaks, health emergencies and an accompanying Contigency Fund for Emergencies (CFE). These fund sources of the WHO from the countries of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and private corporations Coca-Cola Co., Unilever Group and Danone SA. The authors also adds the importance for a potential financing options.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Recalibrating the notion of modelling for policymaking during pandemics
- Author
-
Yot Teerawattananon, Sarin KC, Y.-Ling Chi, Saudamini Dabak, Joseph Kazibwe, Hannah Clapham, Claudia Lopez Hernandez, Gabriel M. Leung, Hamid Sharifi, Mahlet Habtemariam, Mark Blecher, Sania Nishtar, Swarup Sarkar, David Wilson, Kalipso Chalkidou, Marelize Gorgens, Raymond Hutubessy, and Suwit Wibulpolprasert
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
COVID-19 disease models have aided policymakers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) with many critical decisions. Many challenges remain surrounding their use, from inappropriate model selection and adoption, inadequate and untimely reporting of evidence, to the lack of iterative stakeholder engagement in policy formulation and deliberation. These issues can contribute to the misuse of models and hinder effective policy implementation. Without guidance on how to address such challenges, the true potential of such models may not be realised. The COVID-19 Multi-Model Comparison Collaboration (CMCC) was formed to address this gap. CMCC is a global collaboration between decision-makers from LMICs, modellers and researchers, and development partners. To understand the limitations of existing COVID-19 disease models (primarily from high income countries) and how they could be adequately support decision-making in LMICs, a desk review of modelling experience during the COVID-19 and past disease outbreaks, two online surveys, and regular online consultations were held among the collaborators. Three key recommendations from CMCC include: A ‘fitness-for-purpose’ flowchart, a tool that concurrently walks policymakers (or their advisors) and modellers through a model selection and development process. The flowchart is organised around the following: policy aims, modelling feasibility, model implementation, model reporting commitment. Holmdahl and Buckee (2020) A ‘reporting standards trajectory’, which includes three gradually increasing standard of reports, ‘minimum’, ‘acceptable’, and ‘ideal’, and seeks collaboration from funders, modellers, and decision-makers to enhance the quality of reports over time and accountability of researchers. Malla et al. (2018) A framework for “collaborative modelling for effective policy implementation and evaluation” which extends the definition of stakeholders to funders, ground-level implementers, public, and other researchers, and outlines how each can contribute to modelling. We advocate for standardisation of modelling processes and adoption of country-owned model through iterative stakeholder participation and discuss how they can enhance trust, accountability, and public ownership to decisions.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.