Search

Background: With endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), guidewire manipulation might be a critically limiting step for nonexperts. However, the causes of difficult guidewire manipulation remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with successful guidewire manipulation.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between October 2018 and October 2019. We measured scope angle between the long and needle axes of the echoendoscope using still fluoroscopic imaging immediately after puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct. Factors associated with successful guidewire insertion were assessed by multivariable analysis using logistic regression.Result: The influence of the angle between the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle and echoendoscope on failed guidewire insertion was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.00 - 0.76), and an angle of 135° offered 88.0 % sensitivity and 82.9 % specificity for predicting successful guidewire insertion. According to multivariable analysis, only angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope > 135° was independently associated with successful guidewire insertion (odd ratio 0.03, 95 %CI 0.01 - 0.14; P < 0.05), whereas sex, puncture site, and diameter of puncture site were not significant factors. After multivariable analysis, all variables were adjusted using age ≥ 70 or < 70 years, yielding the same results.Conclusion: The angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope might be associated with successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. Adjusting this angle to 135° before puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct might be helpful in achieving successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is a common technique for biliary drainage. However, EUS-CDS is associated with adverse events such as cystic duct obstruction, stent dislocation, and stent kinking caused by powerful axial force. A novel double-bare, covered self-expandable metal stent (DBSEMS) has recently become available in Japan. This pilot study evaluated the clinical outcomes of EUS-CDS using DBSEMS. Method: We retrospectively enrolled patients with malignant lower bile duct obstruction who underwent EUS-CDS due to failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). EUS-CDS procedures performed between April 2017 and March 2018 used a conventional fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS), and those performed between April 2018 and April 2019 used DBSEMS. In all stents, the diameter was 10 mm and length was 6 cm. Results: A total of 22 patients underwent EUS-CDS, performed using conventional FCSEMS (n = 12) and DBSEMS (n = 10). Four complications occurred with FCSEMS: cholangitis due to kinking (n = 3) and stent dislocation (n = 1). With DBSEMS, there were no instances of kinking, and reflux cholangitis that developed in 1 patient due to duodenal obstruction was resolved by duodenal stenting. Elapsed time to recurrent biliary obstruction was longer with DBSEMS than FCSEMS (200 vs. 99 days), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.06). Conclusion: BSEMS can help prevent cholangitis due to stent kinking after EUS-CDS, thus increasing stent patency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been developed as novel devices for not only endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic fluid drainage but also for EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD). Although LAMS might be clinically impactful, these stents have not yet become available as EUS-GBD stents in all countries, including Japan. Instead, improved metal stents (NEO stents) have become available. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of EUS-GBD using the improved metal stent with an anti-stent migration system for acute cholecystitis (AC). Method: The gallbladder was punctured using a 19-G needle, and a 0.025-inch guidewire was inserted into the gallbladder. After fistula dilation, stent deployment was performed from the gallbladder to the duodenum. Finally, a plastic 7-Fr pigtail stent was placed to prevent stent migration. Result: EUS-GBD using NEO stents with the anti-stent migration system was attempted in 12 consecutive patients with AC as a complication of other conditions. EUS-GBD was successfully performed in all patients without any adverse events, and clinical success was achieved in all patients. Median procedure time was 19.0 min (range, 19–24 min). In 4 patients, stent removal was successfully performed after 3 months. Stent migration during follow-up (median, 189 days) was not seen in any of the patients. Conclusion: Although this study has several limitations such as small number of patients and short follow-up period, the results show that NEO stents might be suitable as EUS-GBD stents in selected patients. Our results should be validated by a larger prospective, randomized study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rarely expands into the biliary tract. In this situation, because of its hypervascular nature, cholangitis or hemobilia may sometimes occur. Surgery is one of the options in this situation. However, patients with HCC and bile duct invasion are sometimes in a poor general condition, as in the case presented in this report. For such patients, surgical treatment may need to be invasive. Thus, here we report technical tips for triple covered metal stent deployment using side-by-side technique for hemobilia due to HCC. After guidewire deployments at the left, anterior, and posterior bile ducts, 6-mm covered self-expandable metal stents were placed at each bile duct. This may be useful for high-grade hepatic hilar obstruction due to HCC because drainage and hemostasis effects are obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B Video 1 b Small bile duct stones persisting in the periphery of the intrahepatic bile duct were removed using the novel basket catheter. 2 Cholangiographic images. a Bile duct stones and stenosis were evident in the right intrahepatic bile duct. b The bile duct stenosis was dilated using a balloon catheter. c Endoscopic hydraulic lithotripsy. d Removal of right intrahepatic bile duct stones using the novel basket catheter. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Objective: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is performed for patients with advanced cancer because of poor prognosis and compromised status, and bile peritonitis may prove critical for such patients. This adverse event has the possibility of decreasing quality of life by prolonging the time until the start of oral intake, hospital stay, or chemotherapy. Predictors of bile peritonitis in EUS-HGS thus have considerable clinical impact. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine risk factors of bile peritonitis as adverse events of EUS-HGS., Patients and Methods: As risk factors of bile peritonitis, baseline characteristics of patients, characteristics of procedures such as number of punctures, types of fistula dilation, mean procedure time were analyzed. Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the influence of this distance and bile peritonitis and determine the optimum cutoff score for predicting the risk of bile peritonitis. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to examine factors of bile peritonitis., Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. A distance of 2.50 cm offered 90.3% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity in predicting bile peritonitis according to the ROC curve. Number of punctures (>1), procedure time (>20 min), distance to the hepatic parenchyma (<2.50 cm), and presence of acute cholangitis were significantly associated with bile peritonitis in univariate analysis. However, according to this multivariate analysis, distance to the hepatic parenchyma (<2.50 cm, odds ratio 96.98, 95% confidence interval 10.12-929.12, P < 0.001) were only significantly associated with bile peritonitis., Conclusions: The short distance of hepatic parenchyma may be a risk factor of bile peritonitis., Competing Interests: None