Search

Background: Breast cancer (BC) remains the leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. High recurrence risk Luminal BC receives adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to standard hormone therapy. Considering the heterogeneity of Luminal B BC, a more accurate classification model is urgently needed. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 1603 patients who were diagnosed with HER2‐negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma. According to the expression level of PR and Ki‐67 index, the Luminal B (HER2‐negative) BCs were divided into three groups: ER+PR−Ki67low (ER‐positive, PR‐negative, and Ki‐67 index <20%), ER+PR+Ki67high (ER‐positive, PR‐positive, and Ki‐67 index ≥20%), and ER+PR−Ki67high (ER‐positive, PR‐negative, and Ki‐67 index ≥20%). The cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between each variable and outcomes. Besides, discriminatory accuracy of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and log‐rank χ2 value. Results: The analysis results showed that there was a significant correlation between subtypes using this newly defined classification and overall survival (p < 0.001) and disease‐free survival (DFS) (p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients in the ER+PR−Ki67high subgroup have the worst survival outcome in Luminal B (HER2‐negative) subtype, similar to Triple‐negative patients. Besides, the ER+PR+Ki67high has worse 5‐year DFS compared with Luminal A group. There was a significant relationship between the regrouping subtype and the recurrence score index (RI) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that patients in ER+PR–Ki67high subtype were more likely to have high RI for distance recurrence (RI‐DR) and local recurrence (RI‐LRR). Our newly defined classification has a better discrimination ability to predict survival outcome and recurrence score of Luminal B (HER2‐negative) BC patients, which may help in clinical decision‐making for individual treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nodal metastases and breast cancer subtypes (BCS) are both well-recognized prognostic indicators. However, the association between nodal metastases and BCS, and the prognostic value of nodal metastases in different BCS are still remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between nodal metastases and BCS, and the prognostic value of nodal metastases in the different BCS.We found that the breast cancer subtype was closely associated with the pN stage. pN stage and breast cancer subtype were significantly associated with disease-free survival. The subgroup analysis showed that the patients in higher pN stage had a poor outcome than patients in lower pN stage in each breast cancer subtype. Furthermore, when the analysis was stratified by breast cancer subtype, we found that even in the same pN stage (pN0-pN2), there was significant survival difference among patients in different BCS, and Luminal A breast cancer patients had the best survival outcome. However, there were no significant survival difference between Luminal A patients and other breast cancer subtype when patients in pN3 stage. Thus, our study suggested that both lymph node status and molecular subtype played important roles in the outcome of breast cancer patients and they cannot replace each other.