Search

Purpose: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a side effect experienced by many patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer. In the present study, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), a validated patient-reported symptom screening tool, was used to determine the impacts of RT-induced skin outcomes on ESAS items. Patient- and treatment-related factors and skin treatments to manage RD symptoms, were assessed for association with ESAS scores. Methods: Patient and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between December 2013 and November 2015. Prospective data was collected through clinician-reported surveys. Linear regression analyses were performed to detect the relationship between patient-reported ESAS scores and clinician-reported RD symptoms. Results: A total of 857 patients were included in the analysis. Moderate to severe scores were commonly reported for fatigue (n=412, 48%), wellbeing (n=386, 45%) and anxiety (n=266, 31%). Oral analgesic use was associated with ESAS fatigue, drowsiness, pain, nausea, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, and wellbeing (p Conclusions: The ESAS accurately reflects symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, and wellbeing for breast cancer patients undergoing RT. Our study, however, found no association between ESAS scores and RD severity, which may reflect the shortcomings of the ESAS in assessing symptom burden. Further research is necessary to warrant the development of a new site-specific symptom screening tool for use in RT for breast cancer. Micro Abstract: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a routinely used patient-reported symptom scoring tool. In our patient population, ESAS fatigue, anxiety, and wellbeing were accurately captured. However, ESAS items showed no correlation with radiation dermatitis (RD) severity, despite the high prevalence of RD. As such, the development of a new patient-reported tool is warranted to adequately assess burden of RD.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased utilization of telemedicine services. Methods A retrospective analysis of all non-hospital-based medical healthcare services in Ontario from November 2019 to June 2021 was collected from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing database. Only fee-for-service billings were included in the present analysis. Coincident COVID-19 cases were obtained from Public Health Ontario. Comparisons were made based on age bracket, sex, telemedicine and in-person care. Results Billings for telemedicine services in Ontario increased from $1.7 million in November 2019 to $64 million in April 2020 and the proportions reached a mean peak of 72% in April 2020 and declined to 46% in June 2021. A positive correlation was found between the use of telemedicine and COVID-19 cases (p = 0.05). The age group with the highest proportion of telemedicine use was the 10–20-year-olds, followed by the 20–50-year-olds (61 ± 9.0%, 55 ± 7.3%, p = 0.01). Both age groups remained above 50% telemedicine services at the end of the study period. There is a persistent sex preference for females to adopt telemedicine (females 54.2 ± 8.0%, males 47.9 ± 7.7%, ANCOVA p = 0.05) Conclusions The use of telemedicine services remains at a high level across groups, particularly the 10–50-year-olds. There are clear age and sex preferences for using telemedicine. Studying these differences may provide insights into how the delivery of non-hospital-based medicine has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) is rare and there is little evidence describing organs at risk (OAR) and limits to the heart and lungs caused by radiotherapy (RT). Quantifying mean heart dose (MHD) and mean lung dose (MLD) from RT in this patient cohort may lead to better understanding of doses to OAR and resultant effects on clinical outcomes. The primary objective was to assess median MHD and MLD in SBBC, while secondary aims included analyses of 1) factors associated with MHD and MLD, 2) V5 and V20 values and 3) factors associated with clinical outcomes. Methods Patients planned for adjuvant bilateral whole breast/chest wall (WB) RT from a single institution treated in 2011-2018 were included. Median MHD and MLD (Gy) were stratified by hypofractionated (42.56 Gy/16 fractions, HFRT) and conventional fractionation (50 Gy/ 25 fractions, CFRT) and summarized separately based on the following treatments: 1) locoregional RT, WB tangential RT either 2) no boost 3) sequential boost or 4) simultaneous integrated boost. MHD, MLD, lung V5 and V20 values, and demographics were collected. Linear regression analyses identified factors associated with MHD and MLD and factors associated with clinical outcomes. Results A total of 88 patients were included. The median MHD for HFRT and CFRT was 1.99 Gy and 2.94 Gy, respectively. The median MLD for HFRT and CFRT was 6.00 Gy and 10.08 Gy, respectively. MHD and MLD were significantly associated with the occurrence of a cardiac or pulmonary event post-radiation. Patients who had a mastectomy or tumoral muscle involvement were more likely to develop a local recurrence, metastasis or new primary while patients who had a lumpectomy or tumor with a positive estrogen receptor status were less likely to experience these events. Conclusions Further investigation should be conducted to identify SBBC RT techniques that mitigate dose to OARs to improve clinical outcomes in bilateral breast patients.

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a validated tool used in patients with varied cancer diagnoses to measure patient symptoms. The present manuscript will review the literature assessing the ability of the ESAS to predict patient-related outcomes in breast cancer patients. A literature search was conducted of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase for English articles that investigated the use of predictive modelling with the ESAS in the breast cancer population. Study type, publication year, sample size, patient demographics, predicted outcomes, and strongest predictive factors/symptoms were summarized for each study. A total of nine articles were included in this review. Five articles used the ESAS in predictive models to determine patient time to death. ESAS was also used to predict emergency department visits, determine symptoms associated with decreased quality of life, and generate a Health Utility Score. Lack of appetite was the most common ESAS symptom, as it was reported in five studies to be associated with decreased survival. In four of the nine articles, an additional survey investigating physical functioning was used in combination with ESAS to strengthen the predictive models. Included studies support the use of ESAS in predictive models, particularly for predicting survival. Using the ESAS as a predictive tool allows for more accurate time to death predictions, potentially improving symptom management and preventing overtreatment of palliative patients near the end of life.

Patients are commonly enrolled into clinical trials. It has been reported that these patients may have better outcomes than those not enrolled into the study. The reasoning from these improvements could be attributable to closer follow-up, better patient adherence, more health aware patients have, or reaction to observation such as the Hawthorne effect. Three hundred forty-six patients were approached for a prospective skin toxicity study in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) but declined participation between January 2018 and July 2019 (non-trial group). They were retrospectively reviewed and patient, treatment and RT-related characteristics, as well as the occurrence of skin reactions, and the usage of topical treatments were collected. This was compared with a comparison cohort of 349 patients who were enrolled into a previously conducted prospective study (trial group). More patients in the trial group had conventional RT (CFRT) versus hypofractionated RT (HFRT). Data was further stratified and there was no significant difference in moist desquamation, topical antibiotic usage, dressing application, home care use, topical corticoid steroid use, and oral analgesic use. There was a significantly lower pain score in the group compared with the non-trial group in both HFRT and CFRT (OR = 0.091 and OR = 0.348, p

Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) is a common side effect of radiotherapy and can affect up to 50–80% of patients, potentially causing detrimental effects to physical health, clinical efficacy, and patient quality of life. Antiemetic drugs act on receptors involved in the emesis pathway to block the uptake of neurotransmitters and inhibit stimulation of vomiting centers in the brain to prevent and treat RINV. The most commonly prescribed antiemetics for RINV are 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA). Guidelines describing the optimal management of RINV are produced by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer, the European Society of Medical Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. This review will present findings from research on antiemetic management for RINV conducted at our center. A selective review of research conducted in a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic relating to antiemetic management for RINV was performed. Several studies investigating the efficacy of different routes of administration, new antiemetic drug types, and novel combinations of antiemetics have been tested at our clinic to elucidate which approach provides the best response. These include studies on the use of ondansetron rapidly dissolving film, palonosetron, and the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to traditional 5-HT3 RA regimens. These studies provide a framework for future research and could potentially inform changes to future guidelines to include the use of these novel regimens and techniques.

Dyspnea is frequently experienced in advanced cancer patients and is associated with poor prognosis and functional decline. This study used the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to characterize the relationship between dyspnea and concurrent symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients. A prospective database was collected and analyzed to extract patient demographics and ESAS scores. Logistic regression analysis and generalized estimating equations (GEE) identified correlations of other ESAS symptoms in three categories: severity of dyspnea (none, mild, moderate, severe), moderate/severe dyspnea (ESAS ≥ 4), and presence of dyspnea (ESAS ≥ 1), at patients’ first visit and over time, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed drowsiness (p = 0.001), and anxiety (p = 0.01) and appetite loss (p = 0.02) were associated with increased severity of dyspnea at first visit. Over time, tiredness (p = 0.02), drowsiness (p = 0.04), nausea (p = 0.02), and anxiety (p = 0.0006) were more likely to experience increased dyspnea severity. Tiredness (p = 0.0003), depression (p = 0.03), and appetite loss (p = 0.003) were significant for moderate/severe dyspnea at first visit. Over multiple visits, tiredness (p

Background: Cancer patients often present with several concurrent symptoms. There is evidence to suggest that related symptoms can cluster together in stable groups. The present study sought to identify symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic. Methods: Principal component analysis (PCA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were used to identify symptom clusters among the 9 ESAS items using ESAS scores from each patient’s first visit. Results: PCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety; cluster 2: nausea, dyspnea, loss of appetite; cluster 3: pain, well-being, tiredness, drowsiness). EFA identified two clusters (cluster 1: tiredness, drowsiness, loss of appetite, well-being, pain, nausea, dyspnea; cluster 2: depression, anxiety). HCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety, pain, well-being; cluster 2: tiredness, drowsiness, dyspnea; cluster 3: nausea, loss of appetite). Conclusions: Symptom clusters were identified using three analytical methods. The following items were always in the same cluster: depression and anxiety; nausea and appetite loss; well-being and pain; tiredness and drowsiness. Further research in symptom clusters is necessary to advance our understanding of the complex symptom interactions in advanced cancer patients and to determine the most clinically relevant symptom clusters.

Breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) benefit from local control. However, RT can give rise to increased fatigue, lowering quality of life. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify trends and risk factors in patient-reported fatigue associated with breast RT. Patients were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) before, once per week during RT, up to 6 weeks after RT completion, and 1–3 months post RT. Patients were included in the analysis if the ESAS was completed before, at least once during, and at least once after RT. A total of 651 patients were included. Fatigue scores increased significantly during weeks 1–3 (p

Purpose: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a side effect that frequently arises during radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. The present study investigates possible predictive factors of RD, as well as the use of skin treatments to manage symptoms. Methods: Demographic and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively, while skin symptoms and treatments were collected prospectively for patients who received adjuvant RT between December 2013 and November 2015. Patients were seen weekly by clinicians throughout treatment, during which a clinician-reported survey was completed on RD symptoms and skin treatments. Possible predictive factors were correlated with skin outcomes through a univariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1093 patients were included in this analysis. Predictive factors for erythema included dose fractionation (p

This review aimed to assess the quality and efficacy of tools currently used in breast cancer patients to score radiation dermatitis (RD), a common debilitating side effect of radiotherapy (RT). A search was conducted through Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases on 14 February 2020. English articles that evaluated an instrument’s use in assessing RD among breast cancer patients receiving external beam RT were included. Studies that reported on the reliability, validity, or concordance of items between assessment tools were included in accordance with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Twelve studies were included in this review, with a total of 13 skin toxicity assessment tools discussed. Tools that assessed clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) mostly reported moderate correlation with biophysical parameter (BP) measurements and low correlation with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Traditionally used CRO scoring tools demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability between clinicians, likely due to the subjective nature of items on the grading scales. Most commonly used tools were found to be either insufficient or indeterminate in their measurement properties. Current standardized tools that measure CROs are subject to clinician interpretation and fail to represent the patient experience. Tools designed to assess PROs are promising in their assessments of the impact of RT on patient quality of life; however, most PRO tools are generic to all skin conditions and require further validation for use in breast cancer. Among tools that measure CROs, PROs, and BPs, there is insufficient evidence on their measurement properties to establish a “gold standard” for the assessment of RD in breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) commonly report pain, contributing to physical and emotional distress, and potentially resulting in poor quality of life. This study prospectively identified trends and risk factors in patient-reported pain associated with breast irradiation using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and a study-specific Skin Symptom Assessment (SSA). Before RT and once per week during RT, patients completed the ESAS and SSA. Upon RT completion, patients were contacted via telephone to complete both assessments weekly for 6 weeks, and a final assessment was conducted 1–3 months post-RT. Only data from patients who had completed both assessments before, at least once during, and at least once after RT were included in our analysis. A total of 426 patients provided data for the analysis. Overall acute pain increased significantly at week 1–2 (p

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-opp-10.1177_1078155220974085 for A retrospective review of the real-world experience of the Pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Lapelga®) to the reference biologic (Neulasta®) by Gina Wong, Liying Zhang, Habeeb Majeed, Yasmeen Razvi, Carlo DeAngelis, Emily Lam, Erin McKenzie, Katie Wang and Mark Pasetka in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice

Background The adoption of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) into clinical practice varies widely despite randomized trials and guidelines supporting its equivalence to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for certain patient populations. We assessed the use of HFRT at a single institution from 2011 to 2018, as well as time-savings calculations. Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy by HFRT or CFRT. Trends in HFRT use (≤ 16 fractions) were stratified according to 4 subgroups: tangential breast RT, locoregional breast RT, tangential chest wall RT, and locoregional chest wall RT. Treatment time savings were approximated using the institutional median treatment time. Results A total of 5190 patients were included. HFRT use in all subgroups increased from 2011 to 2018. Tangential breast HFRT alone increased from 62.2% in 2011 to 96.9% in 2018. Locoregional breast HFRT and tangential chest wall HFRT use increased from less than 10% in 2011 to 76.2% and 76.9% in 2018. In locoregional chest wall RT, HFRT use of 44.9% was observed in 2018. Increased use of locoregional HFRT was mainly due to institutional policy changes. Time-savings calculations showed that 4002 hours of treatment or an additional 1402 HFRT courses could have been administered if all patients received HFRT. Conclusion The use of HFRT at our center increased in all patient subgroups. More evidence and guidelines for patients receiving chest wall or locoregional HFRT are required because the use of HFRT remains low in these patient cohorts.

Breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) can increase the risk of cardiac disease with increasing dose; as such, reducing excessive dosage to the heart is a concern for clinicians. The purpose of the present study was to assess mean heart dose (MHD) in patients with breast cancer receiving RT, where it was hypothesized that MHD decreased over time.Patients planned for adjuvant unilateral whole breast/chest wall RT from 2011 to 2018 were included for a retrospective chart-review at a single-institution, academic center. MHD (Gy) was summarized by laterality, fractionation, and heart-sparing techniques.A total of 4,687 patients were included. The median MHD for left-sided conventional RT (50 Gy in 25 fractions) was 2.16 Gy across all years, decreasing until 2015 and increasing after. Median MHD for left-sided hypofractionated RT (42.6 Gy in 16 fractions) was 1.47 Gy, also decreasing until 2015 and increasing after. The increase in MHD after 2015 was attributed to a significant increase in the use of wide tangents (including internal mammary chain) after 2015 (P.0001). Several treatment factors were associated with higher MHD in both right- and left-sided cancers, including locoregional RT, high tangents, wide tangents, bolus, heart shielding, treatment to the chest wall, higher volume of tissue irradiated by tangential fields, higher baseline breast separation values, and smaller heart volume. After adjusting for laterality and fractionation in the multivariate analysis, locoregional RT, wide tangents, heart shielding, boost, treatment to the chest wall, higher volume of tissue irradiated by tangential fields, higher baseline breast separation, and lower heart volume were significantly associated with higher MHD (P.0001).MHD should be considered when determining the most appropriate RT techniques for both right- and left-sided cancers as higher MHD was significantly associated with various treatment techniques and patient factors.

Introduction: Clinician predicted survival (CPS) is a crucial part of palliative care but is often found to be inaccurate with most clinicians providing overestimates of survival, potential...

Aims Higher mean lung dose (MLD) in breast cancer patients has been associated with pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis and secondary lung cancer primaries. This study examined MLD in a single institution from 2014 to 18 to assess trends in median MLD (Gy) over time and factors associated with higher MLD to determine best practices for limiting lung toxicity. Materials and methods General linear regressions were analysed to determine significant change in median MLD over time in patients receiving conventional or hypofractionated schedules for whole breast/chest wall (WB) radiotherapy with or without sequential boost or simultaneous integrated boost, WB tangential radiotherapy only and WB locoregional radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysed identified factors associated with MLD. Results In total, 3894 patients were included in the analysis. The total median MLD across all years was 6.8 Gy in patients treated with conventional fractionation and 3.4 Gy in patients treated with hypofractionation. A significant increase in MLD was observed between 2014 and 2018 in patients receiving conventional or hypofractionation, conventional WB treatment with locoregional radiotherapy, conventional WB radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost and hypofractionated WB radiotherapy with sequential boost. Increased MLD was significantly correlated with lower lung volume and larger treatment volume due to locoregional radiotherapy, inclusion of a boost, chest wall treatment and reverse decubitus or supine positioning (P Conclusion A significant increase in MLD was observed over the years in patients receiving conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy. Techniques such as prone positioning should be considered to lower MLD, particularly for patients with predisposing pulmonary risk.

Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) is a common side effect of radiotherapy and can affect up to 50-80% of patients, potentially causing detrimental effects to physical health, clinical efficacy, and patient quality of life. Antiemetic drugs act on receptors involved in the emesis pathway to block the uptake of neurotransmitters and inhibit stimulation of vomiting centers in the brain to prevent and treat RINV. The most commonly prescribed antiemetics for RINV are 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA). Guidelines describing the optimal management of RINV are produced by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer, the European Society of Medical Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. This review will present findings from research on antiemetic management for RINV conducted at our center.A selective review of research conducted in a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic relating to antiemetic management for RINV was performed.Several studies investigating the efficacy of different routes of administration, new antiemetic drug types, and novel combinations of antiemetics have been tested at our clinic to elucidate which approach provides the best response. These include studies on the use of ondansetron rapidly dissolving film, palonosetron, and the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to traditional 5-HT3 RA regimens.These studies provide a framework for future research and could potentially inform changes to future guidelines to include the use of these novel regimens and techniques.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common toxicity that may impair the quality of life of patients with a variety of early- and end-stage malignancies. In light of recent changes in the optimal management of CINV, we undertook this narrative review to compare the latest guidelines published by ASCO (2017), NCCN (2018), and MASCC/ESMO (2016). The processes undertaken by each organization to evaluate existing literature were also described. Although ASCO, NCCN, and MASCC/ESMO guidelines for the treatment and prevention of CINV share many fundamental similarities, literature surrounding low and minimal emetic risk regimens is lacking. Data regarding the use of complementary alternative medicine for CINV is particularly scarce and in need of further investigation.

Background: Clinician predicted survival (CPS) plays a crucial role in palliative care, informing physicians of appropriate treatment best suited to the patient. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of CPS of cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy. Secondary objectives included an analysis of factors predictive of accurate CPS, comparisons of the accuracy of survival predictions over subsequent clinic visits, and comparisons to the previous study in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) in 2005. Methods: CPS was provided by one of four radiation oncologists from August 2014 to March 2017. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), primary cancer site, and sites of metastases were recorded. Date of death was retrieved from the Patient Care System (PCS) and Excelicare. Mean difference between actual survival (AS) and CPS was used to determine the accuracy of survival predictions. Results: One-hundred seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. Survival was largely overestimated (n=135, 78.5%), with CPS being overestimated by 19.0 weeks on average. KPS (P=0.2), primary cancer site (P=0.08), and various sites of metastases were not significantly related to CPS accuracy. Gender was significantly related to CPS accuracy after multivariable analysis (P=0.04), but was no longer significant after excluding prostate and breast cancer patients in multivariable analysis (P=0.2). The mean difference between AS and CPS did not significantly change over subsequent visits (P=0.5) and CPS accuracy decreased significantly compared to the previous RRRP study (P=0.04). Conclusions: The survival estimates provided by radiation oncologists are inaccurately overestimated. Further research should aim to increase the accuracy of CPS in order to improve patient outcomes.

The Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) is an outpatient radiotherapy clinic for palliative cancer patients where consultation, planning, and radiation treatment can take place in 1 day, allowing for rapid access to care. The objective of this study was to compare the patient population and overall survival of patients seen in the RRRP from 2014 to 2017 to that of patients seen in 1999. Patient characteristics including sex, primary cancer site, sites of metastases, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were recorded at each clinic visit. Date of death (DOD) was retrieved from the Patient Care System (PCS) and Excelicare. To show overall survival from the first clinic visit, a Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve was generated in all patients from 2014 to 2017. Five hundred ninety-six patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients were male (n = 347) with a primary cancer site of the lung (n = 165) and metastases to the bone (n = 475). Actuarial median overall survival was 15.3 months. In 1999, 395 patients were analyzed, in which a primary of the lung (n = 143) and metastases to the bone (n = 277) were the most prevalent. An additional 72 patients in this population had brain metastases. The actuarial median survival of the 1999 population was 4.5 months. The changing patient population in the RRRP has resulted in visible changes in survival. This may reflect differences in the proportion of patients with specific primaries and sites of metastases, as well as improvements in the availability of palliative radiation over the last two decades.

More than 70% of patients with advanced cancer experience dyspnea. Dyspnea is predictive of shorter survival and interferes with quality of life (QOL). The present study aimed to identify predictors of the presence and severity of dyspnea in advanced cancer patients.A prospective database collected from patients attending a palliative radiotherapy clinic was analyzed for patient demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores, Patient-Reported Functional Status (PRFS), history of smoking and respiratory conditions, pulse oximetry readings, and primary cancer site. Using the ESAS shortness of breath item, dyspnea was classified as mild [1-3], moderate [4-6] or severe [7-10]. Logistic regression analysis and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to identify predictors of the severity of dyspnea and presence of moderate/severe dyspnea (ESAS ≥4) at patients' first visit and over time, respectively.A total of 252 patients with dyspnea data were included (median age 71.3 years, 61.5% male, 44.4% had dyspnea) in a demographic analysis. Multivariable analysis showed liver metastases (P=0.01, OR =2.04), a history of respiratory conditions (P=0.03, OR =2.09) and PRFS ≥3 (P=0.03, OR =1.75) were predictive of the severity of dyspnea at the first visit. Analyzed over time, liver metastases (P=0.02, OR =1.80), lymph node metastases (P=0.02, OR =1.79), a history of respiratory conditions (P=0.006, OR =2.50) and pulse oximetry90 (P=0.003, OR =3.32) were predictive of greater severity of dyspnea symptoms. Patients with multiple radiation treatments in the thorax region were less likely to have severe dyspnea symptoms over time (P=0.01, OR =0.32). Lung metastases (P=0.04, OR =2.03), a history of respiratory conditions (P=0.01, OR =2.60) and PRFS ≥3 (P=0.009, OR =2.30) were predictive of moderate/severe dyspnea at the first visit. Over time, lymph node metastases (P=0.003, OR =2.51), a history of respiratory conditions (P=0.04, OR =2.37) and pulse oximetry90 (P=0.0004, OR =5.15) were predictive of moderate/severe dyspnea.Liver, lung and lymph node metastases, a history of respiratory conditions, pulse oximetry90 and PRFS ≥3 were predictive of the severity of dyspnea and moderate/severe dyspnea. Physicians should be aware of predictive factors that could lead to dyspnea to promote early intervention for improved patient care and the creation of screening tools for clinical practice.

Breast conservative surgery followed by radiotherapy has been increasingly used for treating breast cancer, particularly for those with early stage disease to allow organ preservation while maintaining similar oncological outcomes when compared to mastectomy (1,2). Traditional radiotherapy in such settings includes treating the whole breast in conventional fractionation of 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction to total 25 fractions over 5 weeks, with or without boost to the tumor bed to further decrease local recurrence (3,4).