Search

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours published in 2022 will be implemented in the European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma for 2023. Here we provide an update summarising changes in the new WHO classification of renal tumours from a clinician perspective.

In KEYNOTE-564, adjuvant pembrolizumab, a PD-1 antibody, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in localised clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with a high risk of relapse. In 2021, the European Association of Urology RCC Guidelines Panel issued a weak recommendation for adjuvant pembrolizumab for high-risk ccRCC as defined by the trial until final overall survival data and results from other trials were available. Meanwhile, the primary DFS endpoints were not met for adjuvant atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor; IMmotion010), adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 914), or perioperative nivolumab (PROSPER). Owing to heterogeneity, a meta-analysis is not recommended. Pembrolizumab remains the only immune checkpoint inhibitor currently recommended in this setting. Overall survival data are immature and biomarkers to predict outcome are lacking. Uncertainty exists and overtreatment is occurring. Treatment decisions should be made with caution and with the involvement of each patient. PATIENT SUMMARY: New results from three trials of immunotherapy after surgery for kidney cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence showed no improvement with these treatments. These results are in contrast to an earlier study that showed that the antibody pembrolizumab did extend the time before kidney cancer recurrence, even though it is not yet clear if overall survival is longer. Thus, we cautiously recommend pembrolizumab as additional treatment in high-risk kidney cancer after surgery, but patient preference should be carefully considered and the risk of overtreatment should be discussed.

Objective: To review the factors that may influence the ability to achieve the present guidelines’ recommendations in a well-resourced tertiary centre. According to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, definitive treatment (primary ureteroscopy (URS) or shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)) should be offered to patients with symptomatic renal colic that are unlikely to pass the stone within 48 h of diagnosis. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients presenting to the emergency department between January and December 2019 with a ureteric or renal stone diagnosis. The rate of emergency intervention, risk factors for intervention and outcomes were compared between patients who were treated by primary definitive surgery vs. primary symptom relief by urethral stenting alone. Results: A total of 244 patients required surgical management for symptomatic ureteric colic without symptoms of urinary infection. Of those, 92 patients (37.7%) underwent definitive treatment by either primary URS (82 patients) or ESWL (9 patients). The mean time for the procedure was 25.5 h (range: 1–118). Patients who underwent primary definitive treatment were likelier to have smaller and distally located stones than the primary stenting group. Primary ureteroscopy was more likely to be performed in a supervised setting than emergency stenting. Conclusions: Although definitive treatment carries high success rates, in a high-volume tertiary referral centre, it may not be feasible to offer it to all patients, with emergency stenting providing a safe and quick interim measure. Factors determining the ability to provide definitive treatment are stone location, stone size and resident supervision in theatre.

Objective: To investigate whether pT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should be followed differently after partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) based on a retrospective analysis of a multicentre database (RECUR). Subjects: A retrospective study was conducted in 3380 patients treated for nonmetastatic RCC between January 2006 and December 2011 across 15 centres from 10 countries, as part of the RECUR database project. For patients with pT1 clear-cell RCC, patterns of recurrence were compared between RN and PN according to recurrence site. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate the association between surgical approach and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results: From the database 1995 patients were identified as low-risk patients (pT1, pN0, pNx), of whom 1055 (52.9%) underwent PN. On multivariate analysis, features associated with worse RFS included tumour size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–1.39; P < 0.001), nuclear grade (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.73–3.08; P < 0.001), tumour necrosis (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03–2.3; P = 0.037), vascular invasion (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.4; P = 0.005) and positive surgical margins (HR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3–8.5; P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis of CSM revealed that the survival of patients with recurrence after PN was significantly better than those with recurrence after RN (P = 0.02). While the above-mentioned risk factors were associated with prognosis, type of surgery alone was not an independent prognostic variable for RFS nor CSM. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: Our results showed that follow-up protocols should not rely solely on stage and type of primary surgery. An optimized regimen should also include validated risk factors rather than type of surgery alone to select the best imaging method and to avoid unnecessary imaging. A follow-up of more than 3 years should be considered in patients with pT1 tumours after RN. A novel follow-up strategy is proposed. (Less)

Currently there are no specific guidelines for the post-operative follow-up of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). We aimed to evaluate the pattern, location and timing of recurrence after surgery for non-metastatic chRCC and establish predictors of recurrence and cancer-specific death. Retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically treated non-metastatic chRCC cases from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (UK, 2015–2019) and the international collaborative database RECUR (15 institutes, 2006–2011). Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted. The association between variables of interest and outcomes were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models with shared frailty for data source. 295 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 58 months. The five and ten-year recurrence-free survival rates were 94.3% and 89.2%. Seventeen patients (5.7%) developed recurrent disease, 13 (76.5%) with distant metastases. 54% of metastatic disease diagnoses involved a single organ, most commonly the bone. Early recurrence (

Metastatic RCC has a variable natural history. Treatment choice depends on disease and patient factors, but most importantly disease burden and site of metastasis. This article highlights key variables to consider when contemplating metastasectomy for RCC and provide a narrative review on the evidence for metastasectomy in these patients.Tumour subtype is associated with differing patterns of recurrence. Patients with single or few metastatic sites have better outcomes, and those with greater time interval from initial nephrectomy. Local recurrence is particularly amenable to minimally invasive surgical resection and is oncologically sound. Very well selected cases of liver or brain metastases may benefit from metastectomy, although lung and endocrine metastases have more favourable outcomes. Although site and burden of disease is important, the key determinate of outcome in metastasectomy depends mostly on the ability to achieve a complete resection. Adjuvant treatment is not currently advocated.Metastasectomy should be generally reserved for cases where complete resection is achievable, unless the goal of treatment is to palliate symptoms. This field warrants ongoing research, particularly as systemic therapy and minimally invasive surgical techniques evolve. Elucidating tumour biology to inform patient selection will be important in future research.

Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for large renal calculi. The prone position has been considered the preferred position to obtain renal access. However, the supine position has recently gained popularity, which confers several potential advantages. The current study analyses the prognostic factors for successful supine PCNL procedures in a larger tertiary centre. Subjects: Prospective data were collected from all patients undergoing PCNL in the Galdako modified Valdivia position at our institution between February-2007 and September-2020. Surgical outcomes variables collected included: the rate of Endoscopic-combined intra-renal surgery (ECIRS), operative times, surgical effectiveness (no residuals

Over the past decade, only minor changes have been introduced in the TNM staging system for renal cancer. Conversely, many milestones and modifications in management of the disease have been achieved, especially for patients with locally advanced and metastatic cancers. The European Association of Urology guidelines panel proposes a new TNM classification scheme for staging of renal cell carcinoma to reflect these breakthrough clinical improvements.

Contains fulltext : 251789.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVE: To analyse if exposure to sunitinib in the Immediate Surgery or Surgery After Sunitinib Malate in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer (SURTIME) trial, which investigated opposite sequences of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and systemic therapy, is associated with the overall survival (OS) benefit observed in the deferred CN arm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis of SURTIME trial data. Variables analysed included number of patients receiving sunitinib, time from randomisation to start sunitinib, overall response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and duration of drug exposure and dose in the intention-to-treat population of the immediate and deferred arm. Descriptive methods and 95% confidence-intervals (CI) were used. RESULTS: In the deferred arm, 97.7% (95% CI 89.3-99.6%; n = 48) received sunitinib vs 80% (95% CI 66.9-88.7%, n = 40) in the immediate arm. Following immediate CN, 19.6% progressed 4 weeks after CN and the median time to start sunitinib was 39.5 vs 4.5 days in the deferred arm. At week 16, 46.0% had progressed at metastatic sites in the immediate CN arm vs 32.7% in the deferred arm. Sunitinib dose reductions, escalations and interruptions were not statistically significantly different between arms. Among patients who received sunitinib in the immediate or deferred arm the median total sunitinib treatment duration was 172.5 vs 248 days. Reduction of target lesions was more profound in the deferred arm. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the deferred CN approach, immediate CN impairs administration, onset, and duration of sunitinib. Starting with systemic therapy leads to early and more profound disease control and identification of progression prior to planned CN, which may have contributed to the observed OS benefit.

Purpose of review Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy has revolutionized therapy of metastatic renal cancer. The success of immunotherapy has renewed an interest to study these agents in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings and prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy. This narrative review will give an overview of ongoing trials and early translational research outcomes. Recent findings In nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), five phase 3 adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials with ICI monotherapy or combinations are ongoing with atezolizumab (IMmotion 010; NCT03024996), pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-564; NCT03142334), nivolumab (PROSPER; NCT03055013), nivolumab with or without ipilimumab (CheckMate 914; NCT03138512) and durvalumab with or without tremelimumab (RAMPART; NCT03288532). Phase 1b/2 neoadjuvant trials demonstrate safety, efficacy and dynamic changes of immune infiltrates and provide rationales for neoadjuvant trial concepts as well as prediction of response to therapy. In primary metastatic RCC, two phase 3 trials investigate the role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy following pretreatment with ICI combination (NORDICSUN; NCT03977571 and PROBE; NCT04510597). Summary The outcomes of the major phase 3 trials are awaited as early as 2023. Meanwhile, translational data from phase 1b/2 studies enhance our understanding of the tumour immune microenvironment and its dynamic changes.

Longer follow-up and new trial data from phase 3 randomised controlled trials investigating immune checkpoint blockade (PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1) in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have recently become available. The CheckMate 9ER trial demonstrated an improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit for the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab. A Keynote-426 update demonstrated an ongoing OS benefit for pembrolizumab plus axitinib in the intention-to-treat population, with a PFS benefit seen across all International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) subgroups, while an update of CheckMate 214 confirmed the long-term benefit of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in IMDC intermediate and poor risk patients. The RCC Guidelines Panel continues to recommend these tyrosine kinase inhibitors + immunotherapy (IO) combination across IMDC risk groups in advanced first-line RCC and dual immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab in IMDC intermediate and poor risk. PATIENT SUMMARY: New data from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced kidney cancer confirm a survival benefit with the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab and pembrolizumab plus axitinib and ipilimumab plus nivolumab. These combination therapies are recommended as first-line treatment for advanced kidney cancer.

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel performed a protocol-driven systematic review (SR) on thermal ablation (TA) compared with partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1N0M0 renal masses, in order to provide evidence to support its recommendations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and only comparative studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Twenty-six nonrandomised comparative studies were included, recruiting a total of 167 80 patients. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment revealed high or uncertain RoB across all studies, with the vast majority being retrospective, observational studies with poorly matched controls and short follow-up. Limited data showed TA to be safe, but its long-term oncological effectiveness compared with PN remains uncertain. A quality assessment of pre-existing SRs (n=11) on the topic, using AMSTAR, revealed that all SRs had low confidence rating, with all but two SRs being rated critically low. In conclusion, the current data are inadequate to make any strong and clear conclusions regarding the clinical effectiveness of TA for treating T1N0M0 renal masses compared with PN. Therefore, TA may be cautiously considered an alternative to PN for T1N0M0 renal masses, but patients must be counselled carefully regarding the prevailing uncertainties. We recommend specific steps to improve the evidence base based on robust primary and secondary studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the literature to determine the effectiveness of thermoablation (TA) in the treatment of small kidney tumours compared with surgical removal. We found that TA could cautiously be offered as an option due to many remaining uncertainties regarding its effectiveness.

Preliminary data suggest that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with higher mortality among cancer patients, particularly in those on systemic therapy. It is unclear whether this applies to patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this case series, 74 patients from a single institution with genitourinary (GU) cancer on ICI were followed up during a 12-wk period. During this period, 11 patients (15%) developed symptoms consistent with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and four (5%) tested positive. Two patients had metastatic urothelial cancer (treated with atezolizumab) and two had metastatic renal cancer (treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab). All had additional risk factors associated with COVID-19 mortality and two received steroids within 1 mo of infection. Two patients developed symptoms requiring hospitalisation. All four are alive 32–45 d after their first symptoms and 28–38 d after testing positive. These patients all had multiple risk factors associated with severe COVID-19. These data suggest that the higher risk of COVID-19 death associated with systemic therapy in cancer may not apply to patients on ICIs. Assessment of COVID-19 severity in these patients can be complicated by the underlying cancer and its treatment.

Context: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. Objective: To present a summary of the 2022 RCC guideline, which is based on a standardised methodology including systematic reviews (SRs) and provides transparent and reliable evidence for the management of RCC. Evidence acquisition: For the 2022 update, a new literature search was carried out with a cutoff date of May 28, 2021, covering the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The data search focused on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled comparator-arm studies, SRs, and meta-analyses. Evidence synthesis was conducted using modified GRADE criteria as outlined for all the EAU guidelines. Evidence synthesis: All chapters of the RCC guideline were updated on the basis of a structured literature assessment, and clinical practice recommendations were developed. The majority of the studies included were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts and were based on single- or multi-institution data or national registries. The exception was systemic treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there are several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations that are based on higher levels of evidence. Conclusions: The 2022 RCC guidelines have been updated by a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2022. Patient summary: The European Association of Urology panel for guidelines on kidney cancer has thoroughly evaluated the research data available to establish up-to-date international standards for the care of patients with kidney cancer.

Last-minute cancellations in urological surgery are a global issue, resulting in the wastage of resources and delays to patient care. In addition to non-cessation of anticoagulants and inadequately treated medical comorbidities, untreated urinary tract infections are a significant cause of last-minute cancellations. This study aimed to ascertain whether the introduction of a specialist nurse clinic resulted in a reduction of last-minute cancellations of elective urological surgery as part of our elective recovery plan following the Coronavirus disease 2019, the contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A specialist urology nurse-led clinic was introduced to review urine culture results preoperatively. Specialist nurses contacted patients with positive urine cultures and their general practitioners by telephone and email to ensure a minimum of 2 days of ‘lead-in’ antibiotics were given prior to surgery. Patients unfit for surgery were postponed and optimized, and vacant slots were backfilled. A new guideline was created to improve the timing and structure of the generic preassessment. Between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021, a mean of 40 cases was booked each month, with average cancellations rates of 9.57/40 (23.92%). After implementing changes on 1 July 2021, cancellations fell to 4/124 (3%) for the month. On re-audit, there was a sustained and statistically significant reduction in cancellation rates: between 1 July 2021 and 31 December 2021 cancellations averaged 4.2/97.5 (4.3%, P

Adjuvant treatment of nonmetastatic high-risk renal cell carcinoma is an unmet medical need. In the past, several tyrosine kinase inhibitor trials have failed to demonstrate an improvement of disease-free survival (DFS) in this setting. Only one trial (S-TRAC) provided evidence for improved DFS with sunitinib but without an overall survival (OS) signal. Keynote-564 is the first trial of an immune checkpoint inhibitor that significantly improved DFS with adjuvant pembrolizumab, a programmed death receptor-1 antibody, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma with a high risk of relapse. The intention-to-treat population, which included a group of patients after metastasectomy and no evidence of disease (M1 NED), had a significant DFS benefit. The OS data are not mature as yet. The Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel issues a weak recommendation for the adjuvant use of pembrolizumab for high-risk clear cell renal carcinoma, as defined by the trial until final OS data are available. However, the trial reilluminates the discussion on when and in whom metastasectomy should be performed. Here, caution is necessary not to perform metastasectomy in patients with poor prognostic features and rapid progressive disease, which must be excluded by a confirmatory scan of disease status prior to planned metastasectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: New data from the adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor trial with pembrolizumab (a programmed death receptor-1 antibody) for the treatment of high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after surgery showed that the drug prolonged the period of being cancer free significantly, although whether it prolonged survival remained uncertain. Consequently, pembrolizumab is cautiously recommended as additional (ie, adjuvant) treatment in high-risk ccRCC after kidney cancer surgery.

Objectives: To analyze the differences in cost-effectiveness between primary ureteroscopy and ureteric stenting in patients with ureteric calculi in the emergency setting. Patients and Methods: Patients requiring emergency intervention for a ureteric calculus at a tertiary centre were analysed between January and December 2019. The total secondary care cost included the cost of the procedure, inpatient hospital bed days, emergency department (A&E) reattendances, ancillary procedures and any secondary definitive procedure. Results: A total of 244 patients were included. Patients underwent ureteric stenting (62.3%) or primary treatment (37.7%), including primary ureteroscopy (URS) (34%) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (3.6%). The total secondary care cost was more significant in the ureteric stenting group (GBP 4485.42 vs. GBP 3536.83; p = 0.65), though not statistically significant. While mean procedural costs for primary treatment were significantly higher (GBP 2605.27 vs. GBP 1729.00; p < 0.001), costs in addition to the procedure itself were significantly lower (GBP 931.57 vs. GBP 2742.35; p < 0.001) for primary treatment compared to ureteric stenting. Those undergoing ureteric stenting had a significantly higher A&E reattendance rate compared with primary treatment (25.7% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.02) and a significantly greater cost per patient related to revisits to A&E (GBP 61.05 vs. GBP 20.87; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Primary definitive treatment for patients with acute ureteric colic, although associated with higher procedural costs than ureteric stenting, infers a significant reduction in additional expenses, notably related to fewer A&E attendances. This is particularly relevant in the COVID-19 era, where it is crucial to avoid unnecessary attendances to A&E and reduce the backlog of delayed definitive procedures. Primary treatment should be considered concordance with clinical judgement and factors such as patient preference, equipment availability and operator experience.

Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for renal tumors less than 7 cm.To describe surgical techniques and trends of treating renal tumors less than 7 cm at our department and present the clinical outcomes of our experience with Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN).Out of an established prospective RAPN database, we retrieved demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological parameters. Operation length was defined as the time between the first surgical incision and the last suture (skin to skin). Warm ischemia time (WIT) was defined as the time between the renal artery clamping and clamp releasing. Data is presented as mean (range, standard deviation) or numeric value (%).Overall, 250 RAPN cases were recorded between the years 2013-2020. Mean tumor size was 32 mm. Mean operation length was 153 minutes. Mean warm ischemia time was 17.5 minutes. Intra-operative complication rates, including converting the surgery to an open approach or to radical nephrectomy, was low. Mean estimated blood loss was 359 cc. An increase in the utilization of the robotic approach has been recorded throughout the years, with a concurrent decrease in the open and laparoscopic approaches.RAPN is associated with lower complication rates and superior perioperative outcomes, therefore considered a good alternative to the open and laparoscopic approaches. Thus, RAPN is the gold standard treatment for renal tumors less than 7 cm at our institute.

Focal treatment for prostate cancer has been proposed as an innovative strategy that aims to achieve oncological benefit while reducing treatment-related morbidity. This treatment is suitable for patients with low and intermediate risk, organ-confined disease. Focal therapy can be categorized as follows: unifocal index lesion ablation, multifocal ablation, hemi-gland ablation or subtotal gland ablation. Different types of energies are applied in focal therapy including high intensity focal ultrasound (HIFU), cryotherapy, focal laser ablation (FLA), irreversible electroporation (IRE) and Photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this review we will briefly present a summary of leading techniques and the available data regarding their oncological outcomes and adverse events. Whole-gland therapies were excluded from this review.

Robotic-pyeloplasty (RP) for uretero-pelvic-junction-obstruction (UPJO) has been performed in our institution since 2013.To summarize the outcomes of RP in adults over 18 years of age.Adult RP cases have been prospectively documented. Analysis included demographic data such as age, sex, American Association of Anesthesiology-ASA Score, surgical-side, pre-operative imaging. Operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS) and short-term complications were also recorded. In all cases a JJ-stent has been left in place and subsequently taken out. Complications were classified in accordance with the Clavien-Dindo classification criteria. Patients were seen periodically with repeat imaging. The renal scan was performed at least once during the post-operative follow-up. Results are given as median (inter-quartile range) or numeric values (%).A total of 32 patients aged 33.5 years (21-45.2) had RP between the years 2013-2020, among which 53% were females and 59% right sided. An ASA score of 1-2 has been observed in 87.5% of all cases. Skin-to-skin OT was 163 min (136-185), and EBL was 5 ml (0-30). Short-term post-operative complications were hematuria (3.1%), urinary leak/urinoma (12.5%), body temperature38.30C (12.5%). In 2 cases (6.2%) the JJ-stent had been re-positioned in the operating-theater (Clavien-Dindo 3b). LOS was 3 days (2-4) and JJ-stent had been taken out 39 days (31.7-45.2) post-operatively. Median length of follow-up was 19.5 months (9.5-26.7). In 92.3% of cases an improvement in hydronephrosis has been observed in post-operative imaging. The renal scan did not demonstrate renal function deterioration.Adult robotic pyeloplasty for UPJO is safe and effective. Low complication rates and over 90% success rates have been observed. These findings are in line with those found in previous studies.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Ureteroscopy (URS) is an established diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); it enables exclusion of UTUC in cases of diagnostic unce...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing prevalence of nephrolithiasis represents a significant economic burden worldwide making cost-reduction essential. Given that 20% of patients with ureteral colic require acute surgical intervention, there is a lack of data reviewing the cost-effectiveness of current treatment modalities. We present a costeffectiveness analysis between primary treatment and ureteral stenting in patients with ureteral stones in the emergency setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients requiring emergency intervention for a ureteral calculus at a single institution between January and December 2019. All patients underwent ureteral stenting, primary ureteroscopy (URS) or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). The overall secondary care cost was calculated to include the cost of the procedure, inpatient hospital bed days, emergency room (ER) attendances, additional procedures such as nephrostomy insertion and secondary definitive procedure. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included. Ureteral stenting was performed in 152 patients (62.3%) and primary treatment in 92 patients (37.7%), of those, 83 patients (34.0%) underwent primary URS and 9 patients (3.6%) had SWL. Those undergoing ureteral stenting had a significantly higher ER reattendance rate (25.7% vs 10.9%, >p=0.02). The overall secondary care cost was greater in the ureteral stenting group (£4485.42 vs £3536.83;>p=0.65). The average cost per patient related to ER reattendances was significantly higher in the ureteral stenting group compared with the primary treatment group (£61.05 vs £20.87;>p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the potential overall cost-reduction when performing primary treatment in patients presenting with acute ureteral colic, predominantly related to reduced ER attendances. This is particularly relevant in the COVID-19 pandemic where it is crucial to avoid unnecessary attendances to the ER and reduce the backlog of delayed definitive procedures. Both primary URS and SWL in the acute setting should be considered, in concordance with clinical judgement and factors such as patient preference, equipment availability and operator experience.

Background: Current follow-up strategies for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after curative surgery rely mainly on risk models and the treatment delivered, regardless of the histological subtype. Objective: To determine the impact of RCC histological subtype on recurrence and to examine the incidence, pattern, and timing of recurrences to improve follow-up recommendations. Design, setting, and participants: This study included consecutive patients treated surgically with curative intention (ie, radical and partial nephrectomy) for non-metastatic RCC (cT1-4, M0) between January 2006 and December 2011 across 15 centres from 10 countries, as part of the euRopEan association of urology renal cell carcinoma guidelines panel Collaborative multicenter consortium for the studies of follow-Up and recurrence patterns in Radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients (RECUR) database project. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The impact of histological subtype (ie, clear cell RCC [ccRCC], papillary RCC [pRCC], and chromophobe RCC [chRCC]) on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed via univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for potential interactions with important variables (stage, grade, risk score, etc.) Patterns of recurrence for all histological subtypes were compared according to recurrence site and risk criteria. Results and limitations: Of the 3331 patients, 62.2% underwent radical nephrectomy and 37.8% partial nephrectomy. A total of 2565 patients (77.0%) had ccRCC, 535 (16.1%) had pRCC, and 231 (6.9%) had chRCC. The median postoperative follow-up period was 61.7 (interquartile range: 47-83) mo. Patients with ccRCC had significantly poorer 5-yr RFS than patients with pRCC and chRCC (78% vs 86% vs 91%, p = 0.001). The most common sites of recurrence for ccRCC were the lung and bone. Intermediate-/high-risk pRCC patients had an increased rate of lymphatic recurrence, both mediastinal and retroperitoneal, while recurrence in chRCC was rare (8.2%), associated with higher stage and positive margins, and predominantly in the liver and bone. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusions: The main histological subtypes of RCC exhibit a distinct pattern and dynamics of recurrence. Results suggest that intermediate- to high-risk pRCC may benefit from cross-sectional abdominal imaging every 6 mo until 2 yr after surgery, while routine imaging might be abandoned for chRCC except for abdominal computed tomography in patients with advanced tumour stage or positive margins. Patient summary: In this analysis of a large database from 15 countries around Europe, we found that the main histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma have a distinct pattern and dynamics of recurrence. Patients should be followed differently according to subtype and risk score. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Nivolumab has been approved as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Europe. We performed a real-world analysis to validate this practice. The study included 264 patients from 24 hospitals in the Netherlands. We found that toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab are comparable with previous results. Increase in eosinophil count was the strongest predictor of improved survival. Results can be used to improve personalized therapy.Background: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, has been approved as secondline treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe since 2016. We investigated the toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab as well as potential predictive biomarkers in the Dutch population. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the Dutch national registry of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced RCC. The main outcome parameters included toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment failure (TTF). In addition, potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers for outcomes were evaluated. Results: Data on 264 patients were available, of whom 42% were International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) poor risk at start of nivolumab, 16% had >= 3 lines of previous therapy, 7% had noneclear-cell RCC, 11% had brain metastases, and 20% were previously treated with everolimus. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. The median OS was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 13.7-23.7 months). Progression occurred in 170 (64.4%) of 264 patients, with a 6-and 12months TTP of 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively. The ORR was 18.6% (49 of 264; 95% confidence interval, 14%-23%). Elevated baseline lymphocytes were associated with improved PFS (P=.038) and elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase with poor OS, PFS, and TTF (P=.000). On-treatment increase in eosinophils by week 8 predicted improved OS (P=.003), PFS (P=.000), and TTF (P=.014), whereas a decrease of neutrophils was associated with significantly better TTF (P=.023). Conclusions: The toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab for metastatic RCC after previous lines of therapy are comparable with the results in the pivotal phase III trial and other real-world data. On-treatment increase in eosinophil count is a potential biomarker for efficacy and warrants further investigation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction The purpose of prioritisation is to minimise harm while safeguarding access to health care in times of reduced resources. The EAU Guideline Office Rapid Reaction Group (GORRG) issued priority recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated if the clinical prioritisation for suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) planned for surgery matched final pathological risk. Methods From 23 March 2020 until 10 October 2020, patients with suspected RCC were prioritised according to GORGG recommendations. To increase statistical power, GORGG prioritisation was also retrospectively assigned to pre-lockdown RCC surgical cases. The priority group was assessed according to GORGG guidelines, and postoperative risk was assessed according to 2003 Leibovich scores. We evaluated concordance between GORGG prioritisation and post-operative risk, and if stratification could be further improved by subgrouping of size. Results 351 patients with suspected RCC were prioritised and underwent surgery. The intermediate priority group showed poor concordance, with 25.7% and 16.4% being pathological low and high risk, respectively. The low priority group harboured 14.9% intermediate and 1.06% high risk RCC. Within the EAU intermediate group, 34.2% of cT1b tumours were low risk, and 32.3% of cT2a tumours high risk. Analysing at 1 cm increments, 45.1% of 4-5cm tumours were low risk. Conclusions The recommended prioritisation system can be error prone and should be prudently applied based on the centre’s needs. Particularly amongst the intermediate group, centres with clinical capacity should not defer intervention of cT2a tumours for longer than absolutely necessary and in severely limited resources may consider intermediate priority tumours < 5cm as low priority.

The recent randomized controlled phase III CLEAR trial results are the last to complement immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based doublet combination therapies for treatment-naive metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. The CLEAR trial demonstrated an improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and an objective response rate (ORR) benefit for the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib. The CheckMate-9ER trial update demonstrated an ongoing PFS, OS, and quality-of-life benefit for cabozantinib plus nivolumab over sunitinib as did the update of Keynote-426 for axitinib plus pembrolizumab in the intention-to-treat population, with a PFS benefit seen across all International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) subgroups. In the IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk groups, the CheckMate-214 trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab confirmed the OS benefit with a PFS plateauing after 30 months. The RCC Guidelines Panel recommends three tyrosine kinase inhibitors + ICI combinations of axitinib plus pembrolizumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab across all IMDC risk groups in advanced first-line RCC, and dual immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab in IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk groups. Patient summary New data from combination trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced kidney cancer confirm a survival benefit for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab (with improved quality-of-life), axitinib plus pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab plus nivolumab. These combination therapies are recommended as first-line treatment for advanced kidney cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy has revolutionized therapy of metastatic renal cancer. The success of immunotherapy has renewed an interest to study these agents in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings and prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy. This narrative review will give an overview of ongoing trials and early translational research outcomes.In nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), five phase 3 adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials with ICI monotherapy or combinations are ongoing with atezolizumab (IMmotion 010; NCT03024996), pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-564; NCT03142334), nivolumab (PROSPER; NCT03055013), nivolumab with or without ipilimumab (CheckMate 914; NCT03138512) and durvalumab with or without tremelimumab (RAMPART; NCT03288532). Phase 1b/2 neoadjuvant trials demonstrate safety, efficacy and dynamic changes of immune infiltrates and provide rationales for neoadjuvant trial concepts as well as prediction of response to therapy. In primary metastatic RCC, two phase 3 trials investigate the role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy following pretreatment with ICI combination (NORDICSUN; NCT03977571 and PROBE; NCT04510597).The outcomes of the major phase 3 trials are awaited as early as 2023. Meanwhile, translational data from phase 1b/2 studies enhance our understanding of the tumour immune microenvironment and its dynamic changes.

Little is known about oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted-radical-prostatectomy (RALP) for clinical T3 (cT3) prostate cancer.To investigate oncologic outcomes of patients with cT3 prostate cancer treated by RALP.Medical records of patients who underwent RALP from 2010 to 2018 were retrieved. cT3 cases were reviewed. Demographic and pre/postoperative pathology data were analyzed. Patients were followed in 3-6 month intervals with repeat PSA analyses. Adjuvant/salvage treatments were monitored. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) meant PSA levels of ≥ 0.2 ng/ml.Seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Median age at surgery was 64 years. Preoperative PSA level was 7.14 ng/dl, median prostate weight was 54 grams, and 23 cases (29.1%) were down-staged to pathological stage T2. Positive surgical margin rate was 42%. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up time for the remaining 74 patients was 24 months. Postoperative relapse in PSA levels occurred in 31 patients (42%), and BCR in 28 (38%). Median time to BCR was 9 months. The overall 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 61%. Predicting factors for BCR were age (hazard-ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.74-0.97, P = 0.017) and prostate weight (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.08, P = 0.021). Twenty-six patients (35%) received adjuvant/salvage treatments. Three patients died from metastatic prostate cancer 31, 52, and 78 months post-surgery. Another patient died 6 months post-surgery of unknown reasons. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 92.RALP is an oncologic effective procedure for cT3 prostate cancer. Adjuvant/salvage treatment is needed to achieve optimal disease-control.

Dietary modifications and patient-tailored medical management are significant in controlling renal stone disease. Nevertheless, the literature regarding effectiveness is sparse.To explore the impact of dietary modifications and medical management on 24-hour urinary metabolic profiles (UMP) and renal stone status in recurrent kidney stone formers.We reviewed our prospective registry database of patients treated for nephrolithiasis. Data included age, sex, 24-hour UMP, and stone burden before treatment. Under individual treatment, patients were followed at 6-8 month intervals with repeat 24-hour UMP and radiographic images. Nephrolithiasis-related events (e.g., surgery, renal colic) were also recorded. We included patients with established long-term follow-up prior to the initiation of designated treatment, comparing individual nephrolithiasis status before and after treatment initiation.Inclusion criteria were met by 44 patients. Median age at treatment start was 60.5 (50.2-70.2) years. Male:Female ratio was 3.9:1. Median follow-up was 10 (6-25) years and 5 (3-6) years before and after initiation of medical and dietary treatment, respectively. Metabolic abnormalities detected included: hypocitraturia (95.5%), low urine volume (56.8%), hypercalciuria (45.5%), hyperoxaluria (40.9%), and hyperuricosuria (13.6%). Repeat 24-hour UMP under appropriate diet and medical treatment revealed a progressive increase in citrate levels compared to baseline and significantly decreased calcium levels (P = 0.001 and 0.03, respectively). A significant decrease was observed in stone burden (P = 0.001) and overall nephrolithiasis-related events.Dietary modifications and medical management significantly aid in correcting urinary metabolic abnormalities. Consequently, reduced nehprolithiasis-related events and better stone burden control is expected.

Currently there are no specific guidelines for the post-operative follow-up of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). We aimed to evaluate the pattern, location and timing of recurrence after surgery for non-metastatic chRCC and establish predictors of recurrence and cancer-specific death.Retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically treated non-metastatic chRCC cases from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (UK, 2015-2019) and the international collaborative database RECUR (15 institutes, 2006-2011). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. The association between variables of interest and outcomes were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models with shared frailty for data source.295 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 58 months. The five and ten-year recurrence-free survival rates were 94.3% and 89.2%. Seventeen patients (5.7%) developed recurrent disease, 13 (76.5%) with distant metastases. 54% of metastatic disease diagnoses involved a single organ, most commonly the bone. Early recurrence ( 24 months) was observed in 8 cases, all staged ≥ pT2b. 30 deaths occurred, of which 11 were attributed to chRCC. Sarcomatoid differentiation was rare (n = 4) but associated with recurrence and cancer-specific death on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, UICC/AJCC T-stage ≥ pT2b, presence of coagulative necrosis, and positive surgical margins were predictors of recurrence and cancer-specific death.Recurrence and death after surgically resected chRCC are rare. For completely excised lesions ≤ pT2a without coagulative necrosis or sarcomatoid features, prognosis is excellent. These patients should be reassured and follow-up intensity curtailed.

We reviewed the oncologic and surgical outcomes of endoscopic treatments for low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and assessed the prognostic significance of tumor size, location and multifocality.We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at our institution between 2014 and 2019. Tumors were treated with a dual laser generator, which alternately produces holmium and neodymium lasers. A stringent ureteroscopic followup protocol was conducted. We looked for an association between outcome and tumor size, location or multifocality, and for predictive factors for time to local recurrence and progression.The cohort included 59 patients (62 renal units), 27% of tumors were multifocal and 40% were2 cm. The median followup time was 22 months (IQR 11-41), and the median number of ureteroscopies was 5.5 (4-9). Local recurrence was observed in 46 renal units (74.1%) at a median of 6.5 months after initial surgery. Four patients (6.4%) developed disease progression and were referred for radical surgery: 2 had pathological progression and 2 had a rapid and high volume local recurrence, and 1 later developed metastatic disease. The progression-free rate was 93.2%. Tumor location in kidney (p=0.03, HR 1.95) and multifocality (p=0.005, HR 3.25) significantly predicted time to local recurrence. No factor predicted time to progression.Ureteroscopic treatment of large, multifocal, low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma is feasible, does not involve significant complications and has good short-term oncologic outcomes, with a 93.2% progression-free survival rate. Tumors located in the kidney and multifocality yielded shorter time to local recurrence but not progression.

The association between perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) with adverse oncological outcomes have been previously reported in multiple malignancies including RCC. Nevertheless, the importance of transfusion timing is still unclear. The primary purpose of this study is to appraise whether the receipt of intraoperative blood transfusion (BT) differ from postoperative BT in regards to cancer outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with nephrectomy. Data on 1168 patients with RCC, who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy as primary therapy between 1988–2013 were analyzed. PBT was defined as transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells (RBC) during surgery or the postsurgical period. Survival was analyzed and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. Of 1168 patients, 198 patients (16.9%) received a PBT. Including 117 intraoperative BT and 81 postoperative BT. Only 21 (10.6%) patients required both intraoperative and postoperative BT. On multivariate analyses, receipt of PBT was associated with significantly worse local disease recurrence (HR: 2.4; P = 0.017), metastatic progression (HR: 2.7; P = 0.005), cancer-specific mortality (HR: 3.5; P = 0.002) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.1; P = 0.005). Nevertheless, postoperative BT was not independently associated with increased risk of local recurrence (p = 0.1), metastatic progression (P = 0.16) or kidney cancer death (P = 0.63), yet did significantly increase the risk of overall mortality (HR: 2.6; P = 0.004). In the current study, intraoperative transfusion of allogeneic RBC is associated with increased risks of cancer recurrence and mortality following nephrectomy.

Pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy are rare, despite the relatively close anatomic relation between the kidneys and the pancreas. The data regarding the incidence and outcome of pancreatic injuries are scarce.To assess the frequency and the clinical significance of pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy.A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent nephrectomy over a period of 30 years (1987-2016) in a large tertiary medical center. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected and analyzed.A total of 1674 patients underwent nephrectomy during the study period. Of those, 553 (33%) and 294 patients (17.5%) underwent left nephrectomy and radical left nephrectomy, respectively. Among those, four patients (0.2% of the total group, 0.7% of the left nephrectomy group, and 1.36% of the radical left nephrectomy) experienced iatrogenic injuries to the pancreas. None of the injuries were recognized intraoperatively. All patients were treated with drains in an attempt to control the pancreatic leak and one patient required additional surgical interventions. Average length of stay was 65 days (range 15-190 days). Mean follow-up was 23.3 months (range 7.7-115 months).Pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy are rare and carry a significant risk for postoperative morbidity.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The clinical significance of a positive surgical margin (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN) remains controversial. The purpose of the current study was to examine th...

289 Background: Antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are a first-line standard of care for metastatic RCC. Neoadjuvant use of these combinations may lead to downstaging and reduce the risk of recurrence. In addition, sequential tissue may allow identification of key immune biomarkers associated with outcome. Methods: Neoavax is a single arm phase II trial of 12 weeks neoadjuvant avelumab/axitinib prior to nephrectomy in 40 pts with high-risk non-metastatic clear-cell (cc) RCC (cT1b-4cN0-1M0, Grades 3-4). Primary endpoint is RECIST 1.1 partial response (PR) in the primary tumour (PT) in ≥25%. Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Biomarker analysis on sequential tissue is an exploratory endpoint. Expression of PD-L1 (SP263), CD8+, CD8-granzyme-B (CD8/GZMB)+, Foxp3+ cells, CD8/CD39+ and MHC-I were compared on pre-treatment biopsy and nephrectomy samples from 34 pts (NCT03341845). Results: Pts/tumour characteristics are shown in table. Twelve pts (30%) had a PR of the PT from a baseline mean diameter of 10.3 (range 5.6-16.4) cm. Median PT downsizing was 20 (0-43.5) % and median post-treatment vital tumour presence was 50 (1-100) %. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, recurrence occurred in 13 (32%) pts at a median of 8 (2-23) months and 3 died of disease. Of the 12 pts with PT PR, 11 (92%) are disease-free. Median DFS and OS are not reached. Postoperative adverse events occurred in 8 pts (2 Clavien Dindo grade 3a). There were no treatment-related surgery delays and no PT progression. Post-treatment samples showed upregulation of PD-L1 expression (p

UROCIT-K is a potassium-citrate regimen prescribed for the prevention of kidney stone formation. In 2013, K-CITEK was introduced to the local market as a new potassium-citrate regimen that reduces kidney stone formation in a declared rate of 93.We sought to explore the efficacy of K-CITEK versus UROCIT-K.A prospective database of patients treated with potassium-citrate regimens for nephrolithiasis has been reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with UROCIT-K only (Group 1) and those who were treated with K-CITEK only (Group 2). The two groups were compared as regards to demographics, length of follow-up, urinary citrate level and stone burden changes, as well as the number of stone events (i.e: colic, surgery) throughout the follow-up period. In a separate analysis another group (Group 3) was checked. This group consisted of patients who were initially treated with UROCIT-K and later on were switched to K-CITEK.The study group consisted of 104 patients: 54 patients in Group 1, 38 in group 2 and 12 in group 3. The latter was omitted from analysis due to the small size. Groups 1 and 2 resembled in their demographic data and medical comorbidities. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of change in urinary citrate levels, stone burden or recurrent stone events.K-CITEK for the treatment of kidney stone prevention was found to be as equally effective as UROCIT-K in terms of increasing urinary citrate levels, reducing stone burden and maintaining the intervals between kidney stone events.

Introduction and Objective: Eighty percent of patients with distal ureteral stones

Recent randomised trials have demonstrated a survival benefit for a front-line ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy, and pembrolizumab and axitinib combination therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. The European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel has updated its recommendations based on these studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Pembrolizumab plus axitinib is a new standard of care for patients diagnosed with kidney cancer spread outside the kidney and who did not receive any prior treatment for their cancer (treatment naive). This applies to all risk groups as determined by the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) is considered the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) larger than 2cm. The purpose of this study was to ...