Search

Introduction: Severe asthma is characterized by frequent recurrent airway symptoms and exacerbations, and these affect the quality of life. Biological agents can be used in the treatment of patients with severe asthma if the disease cannot be controlled with standard controller treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients with severe asthma who were switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab and patients with severe asthma who responded to omalizumab. Methods: The clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients with severe asthma who responded to omalizumab and switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab were compared retrospectively. Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 79 patients, including 64 omalizumab responders and 15 who switched to mepolizumab from omalizumab. After omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment, the annual number of asthma attacks, the use of oral corticosteroid (OCS), the annual number of hospitalizations, and the eosinophil count significantly decreased (omalizumab: p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively; mepolizumab: p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). After omalizumab treatment, the increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (%) and asthma control test (ACT) score were determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). After mepolizumab treatment, the increase in ACT score was significant (p = 0.003). Drug allergy, chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), regular use of OCS, and high baseline eosinophil count (cells/µL) were associated with poor response to omalizumab treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 7.86, p = 0.003; OR = 52.92, p < 0.001; OR = 10.16, p = 0.004; OR = 0.99, p = 0.004, respectively). House dust mite sensitivity and high baseline FEV1 (%) were associated with good response to omalizumab treatment (OR = 0.29, p = 0.041; OR = 1.06, p = 0.03, respectively). The blood eosinophil count had diagnostic value in predicting the nonresponsiveness to omalizumab treatment (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.967, p < 0.001, cut-off: 510). Conclusion: A high pretreatment eosinophil count, concomitant CRSwNP, a history of drug allergy, and regular OCS use may be associated with poor response to omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma. Depending on the treatment response, treatment switching can be applied between biological agents. The results of the current study should be supported by multicenter studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Mepolizumab is a treatment option in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, which inhibits interleukin-5. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and laboratory data of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were classified as super-responders, partial responders, or nonresponders to mepolizumab treatment. Methods: In this retrospective real-life study, the clinical features and laboratory data were compared between groups of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were classified as super-responders, partial responders, or nonresponders to mepolizumab treatment. Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 55 patients, comprising 17 (30.9%) males and 38 (69.1%) females with a mean age of 51.28 ± 14.32 years. All the patients were receiving mepolizumab treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma, with 17 (30.9%) patients evaluated as super-responders, 26 (47.3%) as partial responders, and 12 (21.8%) as nonresponders. After mepolizumab treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in asthma exacerbations, the number of oral corticosteroids (OCSs) used, the rate of hospitalization due to asthma attacks, and the eosinophil count (cells/µL) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and <0.001, respectively). A statistically significant increase was determined in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) value (p = 0.010) and asthma control test (ACT) score (p < 0.001) after mepolizumab treatment. The baseline eosinophil count, eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio and FEV1 (%) values were significantly higher in the super-responder and partial responder groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.002, respectively). The baseline ACT score and the rate of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps were significantly higher in the partial responder group (p = 0.004, p = 0.015, respectively). The rate of regular OCS use before mepolizumab treatment was significantly higher in the nonresponder group (p = 0.049). As a result of the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the blood eosinophil count (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.967, p < 0.001), eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio (AUC: 0.921, p < 0.001), and FEV1 (%) (AUC: 0.828, p = 0.002) were found to have diagnostic value in predicting the response to mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Conclusion: Baseline eosinophil count, eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio, and FEV1 (%) were found to be important predictors of response to mepolizumab treatment. Further studies are needed to define the characterization of mepolizumab responders in the real world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Omalizumab is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, which is effective in the treatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) who are unresponsive to antihistamine therapy. There are few studies in the literature evaluating omalizumab treatment response in patients with symptomatic dermographism (SDerm). The aim of this study was to compare the response to omalizu-mab treatment in patients with CSU and SDerm. Methods: Patients treated with omalizumab for the diagnosis of CSU and SDerm were evaluated retrospectively. Treatment response to omalizumab was evaluated with the urticaria control test (UCT). Quality of life was evaluated with the dermatology quality of life questionnaire (DLQI). Baseline UCT and DLQI were compared with UCT and DLQI after omalizumab treatment. Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 116 patients (CSU: 92, SDerm: 24), comprising 36 (31%) males and 80 (69%) females with a mean age of 38.95 ± 13.64 years. The most common accompanying comorbid disease was allergic rhinitis (n = 40, 34.5%). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with CSU and SDerm in respect of response to omalizumab treatment (p = 0.890). After omalizumab treatment, the increase in UCT and decrease in DLQI was statistically significant in all patient groups (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively), patients with CSU (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively) and SDerm (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between baseline (before omalizumab treatment) UCT (p = 0.804) and UCT after omalizumab treatment (p = 0.933) between patients with CSU and patients with SDerm. There was no statistically significant difference between baseline (before omalizumab treatment) DLQI (p = 0.356) and DLQI after omalizumab treatment (p = 0.145) between patients with CSU and patients with SDerm. Conclusion: Omalizumab treatment improved disease control and quality of life in patients with SDerm. The findings of this study should be supported by randomized placebo-controlled studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The anti-interleukin (IL)-5 antibody mepolizumab has been used in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma. Aim: In this real-life study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of mepolizumab on nasal symptoms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Material and methods: Adult patients (> 18 years old) with concomitant CRSwNP, who were treated with mepolizumab at a dose of 100 mg every 4 weeks for at least one year for severe eosinophilic asthma, between 2021 and 2022, were evaluated retrospectively. Asthma control testing (ACT), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 1 to 10 (from 1 to 10) for nasal symptoms were compared at baseline (pre-mepolizumab treatment), and at 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The need for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and oral corticosteroid (OCS) was compared at 12 months pre-mepolizumab and post-mepolizumab treatment. Results: The mean age of the 18 patients (9 (50%) males and 9 (50%) females) was 42.33 ±15.9 years. Mepolizumab significantly reduced the number of endoscopic sinus surgeries (ESSs) (p = 0.002). The need for shortcourse oral corticosteroid (OCS) decreased significantly after mepolizumab treatment (p = 0.029). Statistically significant improvements were found in the ACT, SNOT-22, and nasal symptom scores at 6 and 12 months post-treatment when compared to baseline. No side effects were observed post-treatment. Conclusions: Mepolizumab improved nasal symptoms and reduced the need for OCS and ESS in patients with CRSwNP. However, the results obtained in the study should be confirmed with real-life studies involving larger numbers of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The success of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) mostly depends on regular injections. Our aim was to investigate adherence to SCIT with aeroallergens during the COVID‐19 pandemic and demonstrate clinical consequences of treatment disruptions in real life. Methods: Visual analogue scale for quality of life (VAS‐QoL), VAS for symptom scores (VAS‐symptom), medication scores (MSs), and total symptom scores (TSS‐6) were recorded during the pandemic in 327 adult allergic rhinitis and/or asthmatic patients receiving maintenance SCIT, and these scores were compared with the pre‐pandemic data. Patients were grouped according to SCIT administration intervals; no delay (Group 1), <2 months (Group 2), and ≥2‐month intervals (Group 3). Results: A total of 104 (31.8%) patients (Group 3) were considered as nonadherent which was mostly related to receiving SCIT with HDMs and using public transportation for reaching the hospital. Median MS, VAS‐symptom, and TSS‐6 scores of Group 3 patients during the pandemic were higher than the pre‐pandemic scores (p = 0.005, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas median VAS‐QoL scores of Group 3 during the pandemic were lower than the pre‐pandemic scores (p < 0.001). Median TSS‐6 and VAS‐symptom scores were the highest in Group 3 compared with other groups (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Median VAS‐QoL scores were the lowest in Group 3 compared with Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.001, p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusion: When precautions in allergy clinics are carefully applied, adherence to SCIT can be high during a pandemic. Patients must be encouraged to regularly adhere to SCIT injections since delays in SCIT administration can deteriorate clinical symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractIntroductionObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionAllergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a lung disease caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to antigens of Aspergillus fumigatus.The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of omalizumab use in patients with ABPA.In this retrospective study, 12 patients diagnosed with ABPA and receiving omalizumab for at least 2 years, and 32 patients diagnosed with severe allergic asthma and receiving omalizumab for at least 2 years (control group) were evaluated.Evaluation was made of a total of 44 participants, comprising 11 (25%) males and 33 (75%) females, who received omalizumab for at least 2 years with the diagnosis of the control group (n = 32) and ABPA (n = 12). The increase in asthma control test (ACT) score after omalizumab was significant at 12 months and at 24 months in patients with ABPA. After omalizumab, the use of oral corticosteroid (OCS), the annual number of asthma attacks and hospitalizations were significantly decreased at 12 months and at 24 months in patients with ABPA. The increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (%) and ACT score after omalizumab were significant at 12 months and at 24 months in the control group. After omalizumab, the use of OCS, annual number of asthma attacks and hospitalizations were significantly decreased at 12 months and at 24 months in the control group.Long-term omalizumab use in patients with ABPA seems to be an effective treatment for improving pulmonary function and reducing asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]