Search

Guidelines are presented that summarise the legal position regarding the audio/visual recording of doctors and others in hospitals. In general, there are few, if any, legal grounds for refusing a request by patients to record procedures and/or discussions with clinicians, although some staff may feel uncomfortable being recorded. Trusts and others are advised to draw up local policies and ensure staff and patients are adequately informed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serious neurological lesions such as vertebral canal haematoma are rare after obstetric regional analgesia/ anaesthesia, but early detection may be crucial to avoid permanent damage. This may be hampered by the variable and sometimes prolonged recovery following 'normal' neuraxial block, such that an underlying lesion may easily be missed. These guidelines make recommendations for the monitoring of recovery from obstetric neuraxial block, and escalation should recovery be delayed or new symptoms develop, with the aim of preventing serious neurological morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Which journals cite work published in anaesthetic journals is of potential interest to authors, editors and publishers. We analysed citations made in 2017-2018 for articles, reviews, editorials and letters published by 12 anaesthetic journals in 2016, using the Web of Science™ citation index platform. We analysed 12,544 citations made for 3518 items. Citations were most often made by specialist anaesthesia journals and critical care journals, and occurred most commonly in articles, followed by reviews, editorials and letters. The median (IQR [range]) number of citations made per item was 3.3 (2.6-4.1 [1.6-5.1]). The median (IQR [range]) number of journals that cited the 12 source journals was 302 (236-449 [139-671]). The median (IQR [range]) proportion of citations made by the same journal that published the items (i.e. 'self-citations') was 15% (11-17% [5-32%]). There were 1305/1932 (68%) citations made by North American journals for items published in North American journals and 1712/2063 (83%) citations made by European journals for items published in European journals, p < 0.0001. Our analysis may inform authors, editors and publishers where to submit work, what editorial policy to pursue and what journal strategy to follow, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anaesthetists are thought to be at increased risk of suicide amongst the medical profession. The aims of the following guidelines are: increase awareness of suicide and associated vulnerabilities, risk factors and precipitants; to emphasise safe ways to respond to individuals in distress, both for them and for colleagues working alongside them; and to support individuals, departments and organisations in coping with a suicide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Following a 2–3‐month period of publicity, anaesthetists were invited to participate in an online survey that was administered by a third party company on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists and ran between 3 September and 31 October 2018. Anaesthetists working in the UK or Ireland were asked about the presence or absence of welfare/support structures or resources in their workplace in the case of mental illness, addiction and/or suicide. Anaesthetists working anywhere in the world were also asked for their experiences of a colleague's suicide, defined as a colleague's taking his or her own life – whether intentional or not – while practising as an anaesthetist in the UK or Ireland, in the same department and at the same time as the respondent. Respondents were also asked about experiences of other suicides not meeting this definition. A total of 3638 responses were received. Most respondents were unaware of the existence of policies/guidance on mental illness, addiction or suicide, or of welfare leads, within their Trust or department. A total of 1916 cases of suicide meeting the survey's definition were reported by 1397 respondents, although the actual number of discrete cases is unknown because of likely multiple reporting of the same cases. A third of respondents who reported a suicide had experience of more than one case. Most reports were of suicide in the last 10 years, and most reported cases involved anaesthetic drugs. Deficiencies were noted in the support available and in the way the deaths were handled, although examples of good support were also described. A further 1715 respondents reported suicides that did not meet the primary definition. Overall, 92% of respondents reporting suicide experienced it through work, and 41% outside of work (total > 100% as some reported both). Although unable to provide estimates of suicide rates, or numerical associations between the features of the deaths, this survey highlights the considerable emotional and mental burden of suicide on anaesthetists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Audio recording consent discussions, and giving a copy of the recording to the patient to keep, might improve the consent process and reduce the risk of misunderstandings, complaints or medicolegal claims. However, there may be concerns over confidentiality and how being recorded could affect the consent discussion. We ascertained the views of 50 postnatal women and 100 maternity staff (25 anaesthetists, 25 obstetricians and 50 midwives) on making audio recordings of consent discussions. There was a wide range of opinions, with women and staff similarly supportive of audio recording overall, but the women were more supportive of recording than the staff when asked if they were against it, or whether they would support recording the discussion if the patient requested it; and less concerned than the staff regarding the potential disadvantages of audio recording. There were no significant differences in the views between anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: central neuraxial block; complications; history; regional anaesthesia EN central neuraxial block complications history regional anaesthesia 414 416 3 02/08/21 20210301 NES 210301 Epidurals are standard practice nowadays but have not always been so; all innovations require enthusiasts and pioneers. Evolving use of epidural and caudal blocks Dawkins's list of cases in which he used epidural blocks included upper and lower abdominal, perineal, breast, diagnostic and therapeutic, and miscellaneous. [Extracted from the article]

We analysed how long it has taken for papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii to be retracted: investigations into these three anaesthetists have shown much of their research to be unethical or fraudulent. To date, 94% of their combined papers requiring retraction have been retracted; however, only 85% of the retraction notices were compliant with guidelines produced by the Committee on Publication Ethics. We contacted the Editors-in-Chief and/or publishers of all the journals containing articles that had been identified as requiring retraction but had not yet been retracted. In response to our enquiries, 16 articles have since been retracted; we have documented the journals' responses regarding the remaining papers and await further retractions in the future. There is room for improvement in the way that unethical or fraudulent papers are handled by journals and publishers, beyond the identification of the authors' misconduct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous guidelines on consent for anaesthesia were issued by the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland in 1999 and revised in 2006. The following guidelines have been produced in response to the changing ethical and legal background against which anaesthetists, and also intensivists and pain specialists, currently work, while retaining the key principles of respect for patients' autonomy and the need to provide adequate information. The main points of difference between the relevant legal frameworks in England and Wales and Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland are also highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author offers his view regarding the inaugural Featherstone Oration, Research not research – a rant in four acts, and Ireland's Winter Scientific Meeting that was held at the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and in London, January 2016, respectively. He mentions that the his four area of concern about research such as precision in communications, absurd situation, and training programs in managing research.

The article discusses national obstetric-specific difficult airway guidelines developed by the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association in Great Britain to provide a framework for safe obstetric general anaesthesia and management of difficult or failed tracheal intubation. Topics include challenges of anaesthetists in making decisions in case of clinical emergencies in the obstetric setting; and a hypothetical case of a nulliparous woman in labour requiring caesarean section for fetal bradycardia.

Objectives The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends annual seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs). Under the current voluntary scheme in England, uptake of vaccine in this group remains well below the 75% target. A mandatory scheme may improve rates, but raises the ethical issue of imposed vaccination. However, the existing voluntary scheme could also potentially infringe autonomy if those not wanting to join feel pressured or coerced into vaccination. The aim of this study was to explore HCW views and experiences with the current influenza vaccination programme. Study design Questionnaire survey. Methods Between March 2015 and April 2016, a total of 140 questionnaires were completed across seven HCW groups, with the demographic, vaccination and opinion data statistically analysed using the chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Results No staff group met the national influenza vaccination target of 75% and vaccination rates varied between HCW groups. All groups reported some degree of external pressure to be vaccinated and there were mixed views on the concept of mandatory vaccination, with a lack of certainty over the vaccine's efficacy and/or a lack of information the most common reasons for not supporting it. Conclusion The current voluntary influenza vaccination scheme has a number of flaws. Improvements in the quality and availability of information provided to employees may help Trusts increase vaccination rates, or achieve acceptance of any proposed mandatory programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors discuss the impact of the reports on anesthesia by the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) and by the Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk Through Audit and Confidential Enquiries Across the UK (MBRRACE-UK) on obstetric general anesthesia. Topics discussed include cases of awareness in obstetric anesthesia, recommendations of the reports for anaesthetists, and a forecast for general anaesthesia.

There are multiple methods of assessing the height of block before caesarean section under regional anaesthesia, and surveys of practice suggest considerable variation in practice. So far, little emphasis has been placed on the guidance to be gained from published research literature or textbooks. We therefore set out to investigate the methods of block assessment documented in published articles and textbooks over the past 30 years. We performed two searches of PubMed for randomised clinical trials with caesarean section and either spinal anaesthesia or epidural anaesthesia as major Medical Subject Headings. A total of 284 papers, from 1984 to 2013, were analysed for methods of assessment of sensory and motor block, and the height of block deemed adequate for surgery. We also examined 45 editions of seven anaesthetic textbooks spanning 1950-2014 for recommended methods of assessment and height of block required for caesarean section. Analysis of published papers demonstrated a wide variation in techniques, though there has been a trend towards the increased use of touch, and an increased use of a block height of T5 over the study period. Only 115/284 (40.5%) papers described the method of assessing motor block, with most of those that did (102/115; 88.7%) describing it as the 'Bromage scale', although only five of these (4.9%) matched the original description by Bromage. The required height of block recommended by textbooks has risen over the last 30 years to T4, although only four textbooks made any recommendation about the preferred sensory modality. The variation in methods suggested by surveys of practice is reflected in variation in published trials, and there is little consensus or guidance in anaesthetic textbooks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the issues of retraction and corrections published in the journal "Anaesthesia." He stresses on the subject of ethics in research and its correlation to publication ethics which follow guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in Great Britain so that publication errors could be avoided. The author suggests the use of the iThenticate software CrossCheck scan to determine the authentication and authorship of editorials before publishing.

Women in labour receiving epidural analgesia with 15 ml bupivacaine 0.1% and 2 μg.ml−1 fentanyl followed by 10–15-ml top-ups as required, who needed Caesarean section, were randomly allocated to receive 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.5% over 3 min with either 75 μg fentanyl (1.5 ml) or 1.5 ml saline. Further top-ups or inhaled or intravenous supplementation were given for breakthrough pain. Time to onset (loss of cold sensation to T4 and touch sensation to T5 bilaterally), quality of analgesia and side-effects were recorded. The study was stopped after 112 patients had been randomly assigned, due to a unit protocol change, from midwife-administered top-ups to patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Data from 51 patients given fentanyl and 54 given saline were available for analysis. There were no significant differences in onset times or supplementation between the groups, but there was more intra-operative nausea/vomiting with fentanyl (53%) than with saline (18%; p = 0.004). We found no advantage of adding fentanyl to epidural levobupivacaine when extending epidural analgesia in women already receiving epidural fentanyl during labour and there was an increased incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting. Power analysis suggested the same conclusion even had the study proceeded to completion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional medical decision making is unstructured and incorporates evidence haphazardly. I present a more structured approach based on decision analysis, a model that considers all relevant options and outcomes informed by evidence where appropriate. This method is useful both for planning clinical management and for analysing decisions already taken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The handover of patient information between shifts enables continuity of care and increases patient safety. We surveyed UK practice during handovers in obstetric anaesthesia. A questionnaire was sent to 239 lead consultant obstetric anaesthetists to record routine practice in their unit and individual opinion about handover procedures. Responses were received from 168 anaesthetists, a 70% response rate. Handover policies were available in 10% of units. Most (76%) responding units had an allocated time for handover. In most units (76%), the duration of handover was reported as being < 15 min but the actual duration and depth of any discussion involved were not specified. Handovers were rarely documented in writing (7%). Consultant anaesthetists were most likely to be present at the morning handover and few handovers were multidisciplinary. Four percent of units reported critical incidents following inadequate handovers in the past 12 months. We identify features in handover procedures that could be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the lack of skills in doctors needed for evaluating and interpreting scientific papers. The purpose of a scientific publication, of which there are numerous types, is to communicate information. Editorials are summary or personal views, perhaps commenting on a specific paper. Reviews are longer, in-depth analyses of the literature. There are generally two aspects to excellence in an experimental study -- first, the study's conduct and second, its presentation. Particular attention should be given to the avoidance of surrogate measures, appropriate measurement tools, appropriate use of control groups, and appropriate application and interpretation of statistics.

We describe a simple, homemade model for teaching cricothyrotomy. It can easily be constructed from materials found in every anaesthetic room and is cheap, portable and usable several times before requiring replacement. We also describe evaluation of the model in a two-part study. First, 20 anaesthetic trainees, both with and without prior experience of percutaneous cricothyrotomy/tracheotomy, cannulated the‘trachea’ using two percutaneous airway sets (Ravussin jet ventilation catheter®[VBM] and Mini-Trach II Seldinger®[Portex]), then scored the model for realism and usefulness for training. Next, 20 further trainees used the Mini-Trach II Seldinger on both the homemade model and a commercially available cricothyrotomy/tracheotomy trainer (Pharmabotics), scoring both models as before. In the first part of the study, trainees found the homemade model a useful substitute for practice of percutaneous techniques and teaching. In the second part, both models were rated well, with similar scores. The homemade model is an easily assembled alternative to more expensive models. Both experienced and inexperienced trainees find practising on such models useful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to study the effect of Synacthen Depot in 18 parturients with postdural puncture headache following deliberate or accidental dural puncture. Women were randomly allocated to receive either Synacthen Depot 1 mg (1 ml) or 0.9% saline 1 ml intramuscularly. Using a 10-cm visual analogue scale, severity of headache was measured before and at intervals until 48 h after injection. There was no difference in the severity of headache or requirement for epidural blood patch. We conclude that there is no advantage to the use of Synacthen Depot 1 mg for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to study the effect of Synacthen Depot® in 18 parturients with postdural puncture headache following deliberate or accidental dural puncture. Women were randomly allocated to receive either Synacthen Depot 1 mg (1 ml) or 0.9% saline 1 ml intramuscularly. Using a 10-cm visual analogue scale, severity of headache was measured before and at intervals until 48 h after injection. There was no difference in the severity of headache or requirement for epidural blood patch. We conclude that there is no advantage to the use of Synacthen Depot 1 mg for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the attitudes of 96 patients and 163 anaesthetists to the need for obtaining informed consent before specialist airway techniques. Participants were asked to score six questions using a numerical scale, as to whether they thought consent was necessary before specific procedures, particularly in relation to fibreoptic intubation used for teaching or maintaining skills. Significant differences in opinion were found between patients and anaesthetists despite a wide range of views. Overall, patients felt that specific consent was required for non-routine techniques, whilst anaesthetic respondents felt this was unnecessary, even if teaching. We conclude that guidance in obtaining consent is needed to support anaesthetists wishing to practice or teach fibreoptic intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary We investigated the attitudes of 96 patients and 163 anaesthetists to the need for obtaining informed consent before specialist airway techniques. Participants were asked to score six questions using a numerical scale, as to whether they thought consent was necessary before specific procedures, particularly in relation to fibreoptic intubtion used for teaching or maintaining skills. Significant differences in opinion were found between patients and anaesthetists despite a wide range of views. Overall, patients felt that specific consent was required for non-routine techniques, whilst anaesthetic respondents felt this was unnecessary, even if teaching. We conclude that guidance in obtaining consent is needed to support anaesthetists wishing to practice or teach fibreoptic intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary The current recommendation of one consultant session per 500 deliveries with full sessional cover␣for units over 3000 deliveries is arbitrary and is not based on workload. The Audit Commission has questioned the wide variability of anaesthetic staffing on labour wards. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between current workload and obstetric anaesthetic staffing in five maternity units. In 1998, a 2-week diary of workload in the participating obstetric units was assessed in terms of staffing and clinical and nonclinical activities. The busiest time was 08:00 to 12:30. The working patterns between consultants and trainees varied considerably. Time spent on nonclinical activity by consultants averaged 51%. Any calculation of consultant sessions will need to take into account nonclinical activities. Other factors requiring consideration are the number of high-risk cases, as well as the number and experience of trainees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current recommendation of one consultant session per 500 deliveries with full sessional cover for units over 3000 deliveries is arbitrary and is not based on workload. The Audit Commission has questioned the wide variability of anaesthetic staffing on labour wards. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between current workload and obstetric anaesthetic staffing in five maternity units. In 1998, a 2-week diary of workload in the participating obstetric units was assessed in terms of staffing and clinical and nonclinical activities. The busiest time was 08:00 to 12:30. The working patterns between consultants and trainees varied considerably. Time spent on nonclinical activity by consultants averaged 51%. Any calculation of consultant sessions will need to take into account nonclinical activities. Other factors requiring consideration are the number of high-risk cases, as well as the number and experience of trainees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytokines including IL-1β have been implicated in the pathophysiology of sepsis and the systemic inflammatory response. It is believed that certain critically ill patients may be 'primed' with respect to cytokine production, and that subsequent 'triggers' may cause exaggerated cytokine production in these patients with exacerbation of their clinical condition; however, no means of identifying 'primed' patients has been described. The presence of cytoplasmic IL-1β within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients in the ICU was investigated as a means of identifying 'primed' patients, using fluorescent antibody labelling and flow cytometry. The study revealed that PBMC from ICU patients had a different staining pattern for IL-1β than those from healthy subjects, and that PBMC from certain ICU patients did indeed stain strongly for IL-1β; however, the presence of these strongly staining cells was not associated with clinical condition or outcome. It is concluded that whilst it might be possible to identify 'primed' patients in the ICU using this technique, this is of no clinical value as a predictor of clinical course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the importance of balanced patient autonomy and maternal mortality enquiries. He discusses the consequences of confidentiality on medical enquiries' value, as well as the impact of data collection on patient's privacy and ethical right. The author believes that maternal enquiry should consider the process of drawing up policy on patients' confidentiality, maximizing benefits by proper methodological design and publishing policy with the report.

The author comments on the policy of face mask ventilation (FMV) before the administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBs) to trainee anaesthetists in Great Britain. The argues that theoretical advantage of FMV has not yet fulfilled in the practice and could wake up the patient. The author believes that anaesthetists might underdose the patients or they might be fearful in administering adequate doses at induction.

Serious neurological lesions such as vertebral canal haematoma are rare after obstetric regional analgesia/anaesthesia, but early detection may be crucial to avoid permanent damage. This may be hampered by the variable and sometimes prolonged recovery following 'normal' neuraxial block, such that an underlying lesion may easily be missed. These guidelines make recommendations for the monitoring of recovery from obstetric neuraxial block, and escalation should recovery be delayed or new symptoms develop, with the aim of preventing serious neurological morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both the recent 'Warner' review of the UK research ethics committee (REC) system and the subsequent consultation document produced by the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) emphasize the need to distinguish 'research' from what might be termed 'non-research'. This is to be determined through a process of filtering or 'triage', the intention being that RECs will avoid considering proposals with 'no material ethical issues'. In this paper we argue that trying to distinguish 'true' research from other projects is counterproductive, misleading and potentially unethical. Our case is built around three assertions: (1) the distinction between research and non-research is imprecise; (2) both medical research and non-research can generate similar ethical issues; and (3) projects should be judged according to what they involve, not how they are labelled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following a 2-3-month period of publicity, anaesthetists were invited to participate in an online survey that was administered by a third party company on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists and ran between 3 September and 31 October 2018. Anaesthetists working in the UK or Ireland were asked about the presence or absence of welfare/support structures or resources in their workplace in the case of mental illness, addiction and/or suicide. Anaesthetists working anywhere in the world were also asked for their experiences of a colleague's suicide, defined as a colleague's taking his or her own life - whether intentional or not - while practising as an anaesthetist in the UK or Ireland, in the same department and at the same time as the respondent. Respondents were also asked about experiences of other suicides not meeting this definition. A total of 3638 responses were received. Most respondents were unaware of the existence of policies/guidance on mental illness, addiction or suicide, or of welfare leads, within their Trust or department. A total of 1916 cases of suicide meeting the survey's definition were reported by 1397 respondents, although the actual number of discrete cases is unknown because of likely multiple reporting of the same cases. A third of respondents who reported a suicide had experience of more than one case. Most reports were of suicide in the last 10 years, and most reported cases involved anaesthetic drugs. Deficiencies were noted in the support available and in the way the deaths were handled, although examples of good support were also described. A further 1715 respondents reported suicides that did not meet the primary definition. Overall, 92% of respondents reporting suicide experienced it through work, and 41% outside of work (total > 100% as some reported both). Although unable to provide estimates of suicide rates, or numerical associations between the features of the deaths, this survey highlights the considerable emotional and mental burden of suicide on anaesthetists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author discusses the study "Sugammadex, airway obstruction, and drifting across the ethical divide: a personal account," by B. McGuire and Aj Dalton. Topics discussed include the administration of therapeutic intravenous drugs, risk of using sugammadex, and the guidelines on airway obstruction management.

A response from the author of editorials on the article "Sugammadex, Airway Obstruction, and Drifting Across the Ethical Divide: A Personal Account" by B. McGuire et al. is presented.

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses a national survey of anaesthetists to estimate an annual incidence of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in Great Britain.

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including one on publication ethics, one on the methods used in the study on in impact of poor quality research by R. A. Moore and colleagues, and one on research misconduct.

The author reflects on the January 2012 issue of "Anaesthesia. The author mentions that the most obvious change in the journal is its appearance and it is undertaken as a sort of freshening up. It adds the introduction of the 'Science Letter' section, which serves as a challenge to those whose articles may not appear so accessible. Moreover, it says that the Airways Supplement will continue along with the 'Special collections' of related articles, which is also available in virtual issue format.

We examined the prevalence of novel acronyms in the titles of anaesthetic and related studies and the response of anaesthetists to them. We separately analysed trainee-led research projects in the UK supported by the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees (RAFT), and a 10-year cohort of papers identified using the PubMed literature search tool. We also conducted a survey of 20 anaesthetists within our institution regarding the utility and impact of titles containing acronyms, and their recall of the associated topics. Finally, we developed a scoring system for acronym accuracy and complexity, the ORigin of AcroNym letterinG Used Term AppropriateNess (ORANGUTAN) score, and measured the progression of acronym usage over the 10-year period studied. Our results show that while acronyms themselves are sometimes considered memorable, they do not aid recall of topics and are, in general, not considered helpful. There has been an increase in the prevalence of acronymic titles over 10 years, and in the complexity of acronyms used, suggesting that there is currently a selective pressure favouring the use of acronyms even if they are of limited benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the collective effort in monitoring and reducing the maternal deaths, as well as improving the safety of childbirth in Great Britain. He says that one of the major achievements of anaesthetists is the reduction of maternal deaths due to anaesthesia. Furthermore, he notes that the ongoing review and reporting of maternal deaths in Great Britain should be continued to support the efforts in improving maternal safety.

The author reflects on the article written by editor-in-chief Steven Shafer of "Anesthesia and Analgesia" on the policy of the journal on ethical approval and informed consent in an editorial. He notes that the studies of condition have involved collecting data of the patients which pertains consent and confidentiality. He cites that the editorial board of the journal "Anaesthesia" will be following the guidance published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) on "non-research" studies.

An abstract of the article "Transparency of UK Anaesthetic Organisations," by S. Griffiths and S. M. Yentis is presented.

The author discusses the case report by B. McGuire and A. J. Dalton which illustrates how clinicians explore methods of improving quality of care. The author also mentioned the importance of understanding basic ethical principles involved in the study, proper governance of project oversight, and awareness of local regulatory mechanisms and processes.