Search

Background Patients sometimes contract healthcare associated infections (HCAI) which are unrelated to their primary reasons for hospital admission. Surgical site infections are the most investigated and most recurrent type of HCAI in developing countries, affecting up to one-third of surgical patients. Objective This study aimed to assess and offer context to the hand hygiene resources available in a Nigerian teaching hospital through ward infrastructure survey, and to determine the hand hygiene compliance rate among surgical healthcare workers (HCWs) in a Nigerian teaching hospital through hand hygiene observations. Methods Ward infrastructure survey was conducted in the two adult surgical wards of the hospital using the World Health Organisation (WHO) hand hygiene ward infrastructure survey form. Hand hygiene observations were monitored over seven days in the surgical wards using a modified WHO hand hygiene observation form. Results Hand hygiene resources were insufficient, below the WHO recommended minimum standards. Seven hundred hand hygiene opportunities were captured. Using SPSS version 24.0, we conducted a descriptive analysis of audit results, and results were presented according to professional group, seniority and hand hygiene opportunities of the participants. Overall hand hygiene compliance was 29.1% and compliance was less than 40% across the three professional groups of doctors, nurses and healthcare assistants. Conclusion Hand hygiene compliance rates of the surgical HCWs are comparable to those in other Sub-Saharan African countries as well as in developed countries.

Background Hand hygiene (HH) is the primary measure in the prevention of health care–associated infections; however, from published studies, compliance of health care workers (HCWs) to HH guidelines is low. There is currently no review on HH compliance rates in developing countries, specifically sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), or the barriers to compliance. We therefore, through a narrative review, sought to identify the compliance with and the barriers to HH in SSA. Methods From 3 databases, we performed a search of peer-reviewed studies from SSA, conducted among HCWs, published in the English language between 2005 and 2017. Only studies that reported HH compliance and/or barriers were included. Results A total of 278 articles were identified, and the final sample of 27 articles was analyzed in full length. Overall, the HH compliance rate was estimated to be 21.1%, and doctors had better compliance irrespective of the type of patient contact. The main barriers identified were heavy workload, infrastructural deficit (eg, lack of water, soap, hand sanitizers, and blocked/leaking sinks), and poorly positioned facilities. Conclusions HH compliance is poor among SSA HCWs. There is a need for more reports of HH compliance in SSA, and emphasis needs to be placed on surgical wards in which surgical site infections—the most common form of health care—associated infections in SSA—are most likely to occur. Barriers identified in this review are consistent with the findings of studies conducted elsewhere; however, it appears that heavy workload, infrastructural deficit, and poorly positioned facilities are more likely in developing countries.