Search

By the methods of document literature and on-the-sport investigation, we have contrasted and analyzed the connotation and feature of sports autonomy, sports heteronomy, and good sports governance, aiming to point out the road of sports governance. Sports autonomy emphasizes sports by soft law, and sports by elite administration. Sports heteronomy sticks to athletics humane attribute and sports organizational social attribute, and emphasizes the universality of general legal principle. Good sports governance sticks to sports arbitrate and sports autonomy of general legal principle. What course to follow in the future? The sports organizations of China need to explore the cooperation governing model of government leading, multi-participation, under the sports legal framework, according to the sports good governing state level evolution of moral self-discipline, supervision and specification, and legal system. According to sports articles of association, we should detail internal criterion, purify autonomy rules, and complete the correspondence of internal governance system and outer rules of law system; advance the normalization, hyalinization and legalization of sports organizational governance. The core is organic bond and benign interaction of autonomy and heteronomy, soft law and hard law, which means that in the process of balanced autonomy and heteronomy, considering soft law and hard law, sports can achieve good governance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]