Search

Purpose: To investigate the image quality and feasibility of a novel artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) algorithm for aortic computer tomography angiography (CTA) with a low radiation dose and contrast material (CM) dosage protocol in comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithm for standard-of-care aortic CTA.Methods: Fifty consecutive patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years, mean BMI 24.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with aortic diseases were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent at least twice follow-up aortic CTA examinations. Standard dose CT (SDCT) was applied in the initial follow-up examination (100 kVp, auto mAs, contrast dose 0.8 mgL/kg), images were reconstructed with HIR (SDCT-HIR). In the second follow-up examination, patients underwent scanning with low dose CT (LDCT) (70 kVp, auto mAs, contrast dose 0.5 mgL/kg), images were reconstructed with HIR (LDCT-HIR) as well as AIIR (LDCT-AIIR). Attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for objective analysis. Subjective image quality was rated by two blinded radiologists using a 5-point scale. The effective radiation dose and CM dosage were also recorded.Results: The effective radiation dose (1.58 ± 0.17 mSv vs. 9.96 ± 1.05 mSv, P < 0.001) and CM dosage (34.38 ± 5.43 ml vs. 54.64 ± 8.63 ml, P < 0.001) achieved a remarkable reduction of 84.14% and 37.08% in the LDCT compared to the SDCT. The attenuation was similar among the three reconstructed images (P > 0.05). Compared to LDCT-HIR images, LDCT-AIIR showed a lower noise and higher SNR and CNR. For qualitative analysis, there were no significant differences between the LDCT-AIIR and the SDCT-HIR images among four metrics (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Compared to standard-of-care aortic CTA with HIR, the application of the AIIR algorithm allows for radiation dose and CM dosage reduction while preserving image quality on low dose aortic CTA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance for obstructive coronary artery disease of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during TAVI planning CT using a whole-heart coverage CT scanner. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive TAVI candidates with AF (50 men, 74 ± 6 years) who underwent both TAVI planning CT and invasive coronary catheter angiography (ICA) were retrospectively analyzed. With ICA results as the reference standard, the accuracy of TAVI planning CT for lesion detection on a per-vessel and per-patient level was calculated. Meanwhile, image quality, contrast volume, and effective dose (ED) were evaluated. A 5-point visual scale (1–5) was used to assess the subjective image quality. The CT value and signal-to-noise ratio were measured for the left main coronary artery (LM), left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary arteries (RCA). Results: The ED for CCTA was 3.25 ± 1.39 mSv and contrast volume was 58.14 ± 12.34 mL. A total of 1371 (1371/1408 = 97.4%) segments with diameter > 1.5 mm were analyzed. For the subjective evaluation, the mean score was 3.99 ± 0.96 for overall image quality. The mean CT values in LM, RCA, LCX, and LAD were all above 400 HU. For the detection of > 50% stenosis, TAVI planning CT provided on the per-vessel and per-patient basis 97.06% and 100% in sensitivity, 96.23% and 89.06% in specificity, 99.7% and 100% in negative predictive value, and 73.3% and 77.4% in positive predictive value, respectively. Conclusion: TAVI planning CT with whole-heart coverage demonstrates good CCTA image quality and a high sensitivity and NPV in excluding obstructive CAD in TAVI candidates with AF. Key Points: • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation planning (TAVI) CT with whole-heart coverage enables good image quality of CCTA in TAVI candidates with atrial fibrillation. • Obstructive coronary artery disease may be excluded with high accuracy in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates with atrial fibrillation with the usage of whole-heart coverage TAVI planning CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore the use of 70-kVp tube voltage combined with high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) in reducing radiation and contrast doses in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with body mass index (BMI) < 26 kg/m2, in comparison with the conventional scan protocol using 120 kVp and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). Methods: A total of 100 patients referred to CCTA were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: low-dose group (n = 50) with 70 kVp, Smart mA for noise index (NI) of 36HU, contrast dose rate of 16mgI/kg/s, and DLIR-H, and conventional group (n = 50) with 120 kV, Smart mA for NI of 25HU, contrast dose rate of 32mgI/kg/s, and 60%ASIR-V. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective image quality score, and objective image quality measurement (image noise, contrast-noise-ratio (CNR), and signal–noise-ratio (SNR) for vessel) were compared between the two groups. Results: Low-dose group used significantly reduced contrast dose (23.82 ± 3.69 mL, 50.6% reduction) and radiation dose (0.75 ± 0.14 mSv, 54.5% reduction) compared to the conventional group (48.23 ± 6.38 mL and 1.65 ± 0.66 mSv, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Both groups had similar enhancement in vessels. However, the low-dose group had lower background noise (23.57 ± 4.74 HU vs. 35.04 ± 8.41 HU), higher CNR in RCA (48.63 ± 10.76 vs. 29.32 ± 5.52), LAD (47.33 ± 10.20 vs. 29.27 ± 5.12), and LCX (46.74 ± 9.76 vs. 28.58 ± 5.12) (all p < 0.001) compared to the conventional group. Conclusions: The use of 70-kVp tube voltage combined with DLIR-H for CCTA in normal size patients significantly reduces radiation dose and contrast dose while further improving image quality compared with the conventional 120-kVp tube voltage with 60%ASIR-V. Key Points: • The combination of 70-kVp tube voltage and high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) algorithm protocol reduces approximately 50% of radiation and contrast doses in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) compared with the conventional scan protocol. • CCTA of normal size (BMI < 26 kg/m2) patients acquired at sub-mSv radiation dose and 24 mL contrast dose through the combination of 70-kVp tube voltage and DLIR-H algorithm achieves excellent diagnostic image quality with a good inter-rater agreement. • DLIR-H algorithm shows a higher capacity of significantly reducing image noise than adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm in CCTA examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• 80-kVp and DLIR algorithm reduces 45% of radiation dose and 43% contrast dose in CCTA for overweight patients. • CCTA of overweight patients acquired at 1 mSv and 34 mL through the combination of 80-kVp and DLIR algorithm. • DLIR algorithm shows higher capacity of significantly reducing image noise and improving image quality in CCTA. To investigate the use of an 80-kVp tube voltage combined with a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for overweight patients to reduce radiation and contrast doses in comparison with the 120-kVp protocol and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). One hundred consecutive CCTA patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a low-dose group (n = 50) with 80-kVp, smart mA for noise index (NI) of 36 HU, contrast dose rate of 18 mgI/kg/s and DLIR and 60 % ASIR-V and a standard-dose group (n = 50) with 120-kVp, smart mA for NI of 25 HU, contrast dose rate of 32 mgI/kg/s and 60 % ASIR-V. The radiation and contrast dose, subjective image quality score, attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. The low-dose group achieved a significant reduction in the effective radiation dose (1.01 ± 0.45 mSv vs 1.85 ± 0.40 mSv, P < 0.001) and contrast dose (33.69 ± 3.87 mL vs 59.11 ± 5.60 mL, P < 0.001) compared to the standard-dose group. The low-dose group with DLIR presented similar enhancement but lower noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than the standard-dose group. Moreover, the same patient comparison in the low-dose group between different reconstructions showed that DLIR images had slightly and consistently higher CT values in small vessels, indicating better defined vessels, much lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than ASIR-V images (all P < 0.001). The application of 80-kVp and DLIR allows for significant radiation and dose reduction while further improving image quality in CCTA for overweight patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]