Search

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer allowing tumor diagnosis with identification of definitive patterns of enhancement on contrast-enhanced imaging, avoiding invasive biopsy. However, it is still unclear to what extent Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) is a clinically useful additional step when Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are inconclusive. Methods: A prospective international multicenter validation study for CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was conducted between January 2018 and August 2021. 646 patients at risk for HCC with focal liver lesions were enrolled. CEUS was performed using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent within 4 weeks of CT/MRI. Liver nodules were categorized based on LI-RADS (LR) criteria. Histology or one-year follow-up CT/MRI imaging results were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was evaluated for inconclusive CT/MRI scan in two scenarios for which the AASLD recommends repeat imaging or imaging follow-up: observations deemed non-characterizable (LR-NC) or with indeterminate probability of malignancy (LR-3). Results: 75 observations on CT or MRI were categorized as LR-3 (n = 54) or LR-NC (n = 21) CEUS recategorization of such observations into a different LR category (namely, into one among LR-1, LR-2, LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV) resulted in management recommendation changes in 33.3% (25/75) and in all but one (96.0%, 24/25) observation, the new management recommendations were correct. Conclusion: CEUS LI-RADS resulted in management recommendations change in substantial number of liver observations with initial indeterminate CT/MRI characterization, identifying both non-malignant lesions and HCC, potentially accelerating the diagnostic process and alleviating the need for biopsy or follow-up imaging. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03318380. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In our retrospective study at a tertiary centre, we reviewed the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) as adjuncts to conventional greyscale and colour Doppler US (CDUS) for evaluating focal testicular abnormalities over a decade. This study highlights the potential of advanced ultrasound techniques to provide deeper insights into the characteristics of testicular abnormalities. In particular, we observed that contrast-enhanced ultrasound could detect vascular enhancement in all malignant cases, even those not identified by conventional CDUS, and more conclusively confirm benignity. While SE alone offered no distinctive advantage, incorporating a combination of CEUS and SE into the evaluation of focal testicular abnormalities improved diagnostic performance metrics over conventional CDUS. Our research underscores the enhanced performance achieved by utilising these advanced ultrasound techniques. The comprehensive diagnostic assessment provided by these techniques could facilitate a shift towards more conservative management of testicular lesions, supporting the preference for organ-preserving methods over more radical surgeries. Conventional ultrasonography (US), including greyscale imaging and colour Doppler US (CDUS), is pivotal for diagnosing scrotal pathologies, but it has limited specificity. Historically, solid focal testicular abnormalities often led to radical orchidectomy. This retrospective study evaluated the utilisation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) in investigating intratesticular focal abnormalities. A total of 124 cases were analysed. This study underscored the superior diagnostic capabilities of CEUS in detecting vascular enhancement in all malignant cases, even those with undetectable vascularity by CDUS. It also highlighted the potential of CEUS in identifying distinctive vascular patterns in benign vascular tumours. Definitive confirmation of benignity could be obtained when the absence of enhancement was demonstrated on CEUS. While SE alone offered no distinctive advantage in differentiating between benign and malignant pathologies, we demonstrated that incorporating a combination of CEUS and SE into the evaluation of focal testicular abnormalities could improve diagnostic performance metrics over conventional CDUS. Our findings underscore the role of advanced ultrasound techniques in enhancing the evaluation of focal testicular abnormalities in clinical practice and could aid a shift towards testis-sparing management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantify contrast‐enhanced ultrasound enhancement of focal fatty sparing (FFS) and focal fatty infiltration (FFI) and compare it with adjacent liver parenchyma. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study yielding 42 cases in the last 4 years. Inclusion criteria were a focal liver lesion, adequate video availability, and an established diagnosis of FFS or FFI based on clinical or imaging follow‐up or a second modality. Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound examinations were performed with a standard low–mechanical index technique. Commercially available software calculated quantitative parameters for a focal liver lesion and a reference area of liver parenchyma, producing relative indices. Results: In total, 42 patients were analyzed (19 male) with a median age of 18 (interquartile range, 42) years and a median lesion diameter of 30 (interquartile range, 16) mm. The cohort included 26 with FFS and 16 with FFI. Subjectively assessed, 27% of FFS and 25% of FFI were hypoenhancing in the arterial phase, and 73% of FFS and 75% of FFI were isoenhancing. In the venous and delayed phases, all lesions were isoenhancing. The peak enhancement (P =.001), wash‐in area under the curve (P <.01), wash‐in rate (P =.023), and wash‐in perfusion index (P =.001) were significantly lower in FFS compared with adjacent parenchyma but not the mean transit time. In the FFI subgroup, no significant difference was detected. Comparing relative parameters, only the wash‐in rate was significantly (P =.049) lower in FFS than FFI. The mean follow‐up was 2.8 years. Conclusions: Focal fatty sparing shows significantly lower and slower enhancement than the liver parenchyma, whereas FFI enhances identically. Focal fatty sparing had a significantly slower enhancement than FFI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Because of concern over medical ionizing radiation exposure of children, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has generated interest as an inexpensive, ionizing radiation-free alternative to CT and MRI. CEUS has received approval for pediatric hepatic use but remains off-label for a range of other applications. The purposes of this study were to retrospectively analyze adverse incidents encountered in pediatric CEUS and to assess the financial benefits of reducing the number of CT and MRI examinations performed., Materials and Methods: All pediatric (patients 18 years and younger) CEUS examinations performed between January 2008 and December 2015 were reviewed. All immediate reactions deemed due to contrast examinations were documented in radiology reports. Electronic patient records were examined for adverse reactions within 24 hours not due to an underlying pathologic condition. With tariffs from the U.K. National Institute of Clinical Excellence analysis, CEUS utilization cost ($94) was compared with the CT ($168) and MRI ($274) costs of the conventional imaging pathway., Results: The records of 305 pediatric patients (187 boys, 118 girls; age range, 1 month-18 years) undergoing CEUS were reviewed. Most of the studies were for characterizing liver lesions (147/305 [48.2%]) and trauma (113/305 [37.1%]); the others were for renal, vascular, and intracavitary assessment (45/305 [14.8%]). No immediate adverse reactions occurred. Delayed adverse reactions occurred in two patients (2/305 [0.7%]). These reactions were transient hypertension and transient tachycardia. Neither was symptomatic, and both were deemed not due to the underlying disorder. The potential cost savings of CEUS were $74 per examination over CT and $180 over MRI., Conclusion: Pediatric CEUS is a safe and potentially cost-effective imaging modality. Using it allows reduction in the ionizing radiation associated with CT and in the gadolinium contrast administration, sedation, and anesthesia sometimes required for MRI.