Search

ObjectiveTo obtain insight into experiences of patients with a neuromuscular disease and chronic fatigue and their healthcare professionals regarding content and delivery of a multidisciplinary outpatient self-management group programme to improve social participation. This will inform future implementation.DesignA mixed method study alongside a randomised controlled trial.SettingUniversity hospital, rehabilitation centre and community health centre.Participants29 patients with a neuromuscular disease and chronic fatigue and 13 healthcare professionals participated in this mixed methods study.InterventionMultidisciplinary group programme, called Energetic, consisted of a 4 months intervention with weekly meetings and covered four modules: (1) individually tailored aerobic exercise training; (2) education about aerobic exercise; (3) self-management training in applying energy conservation strategies and (4) implementation and relapse prevention in daily life.Main measuresQuantitative data were collected by a questionnaire measuring patients’ (n=25, all completed the programme) satisfaction with the perceived results, content and delivery of the programme. Qualitative data were collected by individual and focus group interviews to gain insight in the experiences of patients (n=18), next of kin (n=2) and healthcare professionals (n=13) with facilitators and barriers to programme implementation.ResultsPatients were satisfied with the number and length of the sessions, the different modules and the therapists. Analysis of the interviews led to five themes: (1) the combination of modules makes a complete picture, (2) the programme is physically and mentally intensive, (3) the group setting is valuable, (4) small variations in delivery occur in different settings, (5) therapists are coaches. Suggestions for programme improvement include a combination of face to face and e-health, enhancement of therapists’ skills in guiding group interventions and inclusion of more booster sessions to evaluate and maintain self-management competencies.ConclusionsThe Energetic programme could be implemented in different healthcare settings and group settings, and a combination of modules proved to be a facilitator for improving self-management.Trial registration numberNCT02208687.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of Energetic, a self-management group program combining aerobic training, energy conservation management, and relapse prevention to improve social participation in patients with neuromuscular disease (NMD) and chronic fatigue.MethodsIn this multicenter, assessor-blinded, 2-armed randomized controlled trial with repeated measurements, 53 patients with various types of NMD and chronic fatigue were randomly allocated to Energetic, a 4-month group intervention, or to usual care. The primary endpoint was social participation assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) performance scale immediately postintervention. Secondary outcomes included COPM satisfaction scale, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Checklist Individual Strength–subscale fatigue. Participants were followed for 11 months postintervention. Data were analyzed with linear models that account for repeated measurements.ResultsDirectly after intervention, the mean group difference for COPM-performance was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–2.4; p < 0.0001) in favor of the intervention group (n = 29), adjusted for baseline, sex, diagnosis, and work status. This effect was retained at 11 months follow-up (0.9; 95% CI 0.0–1.7; p = 0.049). The COPM satisfaction scale and 6MWT improved more in the intervention group compared to usual care. After 3 and 11 months follow-up, most beneficial effects on social participation and functional endurance were retained.ConclusionEnergetic led to sustainable improvements in social participation and functional endurance compared to usual care in patients with NMD and chronic fatigue.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT02208687.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that a combination of aerobic training, energy conservation management, and relapse prevention improves social participation in patients with NMD and chronic fatigue.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial including process and potential impact of occupational therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Design: Process and outcome were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated in an exploratory multicentre, two-armed randomized controlled trial at three months. Participants: Forty-three community-dwelling patients with Parkinson’s disease and difficulties in daily activities, their primary caregivers and seven occupational therapists. Intervention: Ten weeks of home-based occupational therapy according to the Dutch guidelines of occupational therapy in Parkinson’s disease versus no occupational therapy in the control group. Main measures: Process evaluation measured accrual, drop-out, intervention delivery and protocol adherence. Primary outcome measures of patients assessed daily functioning: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Primary outcome for caregivers was caregiver burden: Zarit Burden Inventory. Participants’ perspectives of the intervention were explored using questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Results: Inclusion was 23% (43/189), drop-out 7% (3/43) and unblinding of assessors 33% (13/40). Full intervention protocol adherence was 74% (20/27), but only 60% (71/119) of baseline Canadian Occupational Performance Measure priorities were addressed in the intervention. The outcome measures revealed negligible to small effects in favour of the intervention group. Almost all patients and caregivers of the intervention group were satisfied with the results. They perceived: ‘more grip on the situation’ and used ‘practical advices that make life easier’. Therapists were satisfied, but wished for a longer intervention period. Conclusions: The positive perceived impact of occupational therapy warrants a large-scale trial. Adaptations in instructions and training are needed to use the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as primary outcome measure.

Contains fulltext : 155131.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue is present in more than 60% of the patients with a neuromuscular disease and can be their most disabling symptom. In combination with other impairments, fatigue often results in low levels of physical activity and decreased social participation, leading to high societal costs. 'Energetic' is a self-management group program aimed at improving social participation, physical endurance and alleviating fatigue in these patients. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Energetic program. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentered, assessor-blinded, two-armed randomized controlled trial is conducted with evaluations at inclusion and four, seven and fifteen months later. The study includes patients with a neuromuscular disease and chronic fatigue and, when present, their caregivers. The participants are randomized (ratio 1:1) to either an intervention group, receiving the Energetic program, or a control group, receiving usual care (i.e., no specific intervention). The Energetic program covers four months and includes four modules: 1) individually tailored aerobic exercise training; 2) education about aerobic exercise; 3) self-management training in applying energy conservation strategies; and 4) implementation and relapse prevention in daily life. Two months after cessation of the program a booster session is provided. The primary outcome is the perceived performance score of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary outcomes include the COPM-satisfaction score, and measures of fatigue, physical endurance, activity engagement, mood, and self-efficacy. Caregiver burden is also evaluated as a secondary outcome. Health-related quality of life and medical and societal costs are assessed to estimate cost-effectiveness of the program. DISCUSSION: The Energetic study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a combined physical and self-management group training program for improving social participation, physical endurance and alleviating fatigue in patients with neuromuscular diseases. It will generate new insights in (cost-)effective rehabilitation strategies for these incurable conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02208687 .

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to support use of occupational therapy interventions for patients with Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the efficacy of occupational therapy in improving daily activities of patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We did a multicentre, assessor-masked, randomised controlled clinical trial in ten hospitals in nine Dutch regional networks of specialised health-care professionals (ParkinsonNet), with assessment at 3 months and 6 months. Patients with Parkinson's disease with self-reported difficulties in daily activities were included, along with their primary caregivers. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention or control group by a computer-generated minimisation algorithm. The intervention consisted of 10 weeks of home-based occupational therapy according to national practice guidelines; control individuals received usual care with no occupational therapy. The primary outcome was self-perceived performance in daily activities at 3 months, assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (score 1-10). Data were analysed using linear mixed models for repeated measures (intention-to-treat principle). Assessors monitored safety by asking patients about any unusual health events during the preceding 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01336127. FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2011, and Nov 2, 2012, 191 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=124) or the control group (n=67). 117 (94%) of 124 patients in the intervention group and 63 (94%) of 67 in the control group had a participating caregiver. At baseline, the median score on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was 4.3 (IQR 3.5-5.0) in the intervention group and 4.4 (3.8-5.0) in the control group. At 3 months, these scores were 5.8 (5.0-6.4) and 4.6 (4.6-6.6), respectively. The adjusted mean difference in score between groups at 3 months was in favour of the intervention group (1.2; 95% CI 0.8-1.6; p