Search

In this note we show that a false statement obtained by replacing a "lim" by "limsup" for a sequence in Lemma 1.3 of the paper [J. Schu: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 43 (1991), 153--159] is used in many papers. We do not know which is the first paper that used that false assertion, but the first one that we identified is from 2005 and the last one is from 2024., Comment: The paper has 14 pages and contains 144 references

The aim of this paper is to revisit some duality results in conic linear programming and to answer an open problem related to the duality gap function for Gale's example., Comment: 14 pages; some misprints are corrected

Lemma 1 from the paper [N.E. Gretsky, J.M. Ostroy, W.R. Zame, Subdifferentiability and the duality gap, Positivity 6: 261--274, 2002] asserts that the value function $v$ of an infinite dimensional linear programming problem in standard form is lower semicontinuous whenever $v$ is proper and the involved spaces are normed vector spaces. In this note one shows that this statement is false even in finite-dimensional spaces, one provides an example of linear programming problem in Hilbert spaces whose (proper) value function is not lower semicontinuous (hence it is not subdifferentiable) at any point in its domain, one shows that the restriction of the value function to its domain in Kretschmer's gap example is not bounded on any neighborhood of any point of the domain, and discuss other assertions done in the same paper., Comment: 16 pages

In the literature there are several methods for comparing two convergent iterative processes for the same problem. In this note we have in view mostly the one introduced by Berinde in [Picard iteration converges faster than Mann iteration for a class of quasi-contractive operators, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2004, no. 2, 97--105] because it seems to be very successful. In fact, if IP1 and IP2 are two iterative processes converging to the same element, then IP1 is faster than IP2 in the sense of Berinde. The aim of this note is to prove this almost obvious assertion and to discuss briefly several papers that cite the mentioned Berinde's paper and use his method for comparing iterative processes., Comment: 10 pages; new references are added

DY Gao together with some of his collaborators applied his Canonical duality theory (CDT) for solving a class of constrained optimization problems. Unfortunately, in several papers on this subject there are unclear statements, not convincing proofs, or even false results. It is our aim in this work to study rigorously these class of constrained optimization problems in finite dimensional spaces and to discuss several results published in the last ten years., Comment: 18 pages

DY Gao solely or together with some of his collaborators applied his Canonical duality theory (CDT) for solving a class of unconstrained optimization problems, getting the so-called "triality theorems". Unfortunately, the "double-min duality" from these results published before 2010 revealed to be false, even if in 2003 DY Gao announced that "certain additional conditions" are needed for getting it. After 2010 DY Gao together with some of his collaborators published several papers in which they added additional conditions for getting "double-min" and "double-max" dualities in the triality theorems. The aim of this paper is to treat rigorously this kind of problems and to discuss several results concerning the "triality theory" obtained up to now., Comment: The paper has 22 pages

DY Gao solely or together with some of his collaborators applied his Canonical duality theory (CDT) for solving some quadratic optimization problems with quadratic constraints. Unfortunately, in almost all papers we read on CDT there are unclear definitions, non convincing arguments in the proofs, and even false results. The aim of this paper is to treat rigorously quadratic optimization problems by the method suggested by CDT and to compare what we get with the results obtained by DY Gao and his collaborators on this topic in several papers., Comment: 20 pages; presented at 4th International Conference on Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization, Zanjan (Iran)

In this short note we show, providing counterexamples, that the "two important theorems" in the recent paper [Y, Yuan, Global optimization solutions to a class of non-convex quadratic minimization problems with quadratic constraints, in Canonical Duality Theory, D.Y. Gao et al.\ (eds), (AMMA, volume 37), Springer, 2017] are false.

A formula for the sub\-differential of the sum of a series of convex functions defined on a Banach space was provided by X. Y. Zheng in 1998. In this paper, besides a slight extension to locally convex spaces of Zheng's results, we provide a formula for the conjugate of a countable sum of convex functions. Then we use these results for calculating the sub\-differentials and the conjugates in two situations related to entropy minimization, and we study a concrete example met in Statistical Physics., Comment: To appear in Journal of Convex Analysis

In this short note we give characterizations for objective sets and objective functions as defined in D. Y. Gao and C. Wu's paper arxiv:1104.2970v2., Comment: We added a few remarks on some recent assertions of DY Gao and his collaborators on "objective functions"

We give answers to two questions formulated by Borwein and Goebel in 2003 and to a conjecture formulated by Grad and Pop in 2014 related to calculus rules for quasi (relative) interior.

It is known that, in finite dimensions, the support function of a compact convex set with non empty interior is differentiable excepting the origin if and only if the set is strictly convex. In this paper we realize a thorough study of the relations between the differentiability of the support function on the interior of its domain and the convexity of the set, mainly for unbounded sets. Then we revisit some results related to the differentiability of the cost function associated to a production function., Comment: Comments are greatly appreciated

A result concerning global extrema in a nonsmooth nonconvex variational problem that appears in applications (e.g. in a large deformation elasticity problem) is investigated in comparison with a result of D.Y. Gao and R.W. Ogden. The tools used are elementary and the results derived improve upon and correct a recent similar result, more precisely, Theorem 4 of the paper "Closed-form solutions, extremality and nonsmoothness criteria in a large deformation elasticity problem" by the fore-mentioned authors., Comment: This paper has been submitted to ZAMP (Zeitschrift f\"ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik) on April 07, 2010 and was first rejected on December 08, 2010; then, on December 06, 2011 we get the decision "The Editorial Board of ZAMP does not want to pursue this matter any further", without any report. For more details see: http://www.math.uaic.ro/~zalinesc/

In this short note we prove by a counter-example that Theorem 3.2 in the paper "A study on concave optimization via canonical dual function" by J. Zhu, S. Tao, D. Gao is false; moreover, we give a very short proof for Theorem 3.1 in the same paper., Comment: This paper has been submitted to JCAM (Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics) on April 8, 2010 and was rejected on October 13, 2011. There was not given any reason for the rejection. For more details see http://www.math.uaic.ro/~zalinesc/

In this note we prove that a recent result stated by D.Y. Gao and R.W. Ogden on global minimizers and local extrema in a phase transition problem is false. Our goal is achieved by providing a thorough analysis of the context and result in question and counter-examples., Comment: This paper has been submitted to QJMAM (The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics) on February 19, 2010 and was rejected on October 19, 2010. The reason for the rejection was that "the paper is more like a pure math paper" and this decision was taken mainly after the editor investigated our web-pages. For more details see http://www.math.uaic.ro/~zalinesc/

The aim of this short note is to give counterexamples to two results by D. Y. Gao [5, Th. 16], [4, Th. 2] and to improve a related result by S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, R.-L. Sheu and S.-Y. Wu [1, Th. 3]., Comment: This paper has been submitted to JIMO (Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization) on September 24, 2009 and rejected in May, 2010. The reason for the rejection was that " The authors' view on this issue is known to people in the field". See also http://www.math.uaic.ro/~zalinesc/

The main focus of this paper is to study multi-valued linear monotone operators in the contexts of locally convex spaces via the use of their Fitzpatrick and Penot functions. Notions such as maximal monotonicity, uniqueness, negative-infimum, and (dual-) representability are studied and criteria are provided.

Recently in [1] a new class of maximal monotone operators has been introduced. In this note we study domain range properties as well as connections with other classes and calculus rules for these operators we called strongly-representable. While not every maximal monotone operator is strongly-representable, every maximal monotone NI operator is strongly-representable, and every strongly representable operator is locally maximal monotone, maximal monotone locally, and ANA. As a consequence the conjugate of the Fitzpatrick function of a maximal monotone operator is not necessarily a representative function.