Search

Nipah virus (NiV) is a zoonotic bat henipavirus in the family Paramyxoviridae. NiV is deadly to humans, infecting host cells by direct fusion of the viral and host cell plasma membranes. This membrane fusion process is coordinated by the receptorbinding attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Upon G-receptor binding, F fuses membranes via a cascade that sequentially involves F-triggering, fusion pore formation, and viral or genome entry into cells. Using NiV as an important paramyxoviral model, we identified two novel regions in F that modulate the membrane fusion cascade. For paramyxoviruses and other viral families with class I fusion proteins, the heptad repeat 1 (HR1) and HR2 regions in the fusion protein prefusion conformation bind to form a six-helix bundle in the postfusion conformation. Here, structural comparisons between the F prefusion and postfusion conformations revealed that a short loop region (N1) undergoes dramatic spatial reorganization and a short alpha helix (N4) undergoes secondary structural changes. The roles of the N1 and N4 regions during the membrane fusion cascade, however, remain unknown for henipaviruses and paramyxoviruses. By performing alanine scanning mutagenesis and various functional analyses, we report that specific residues within these regions alter various steps in the membrane fusion cascade. While the N1 region affects early F-triggering, the N4 region affects F-triggering, F thermostability, and extensive fusion pore expansion during syncytium formation, also uncovering a link between F-G interactions and F-triggering. These novel mechanistic roles expand our understanding of henipaviral and paramyxoviral F-triggering, viral entry, and cell-cell fusion (syncytia), a pathognomonic feature of paramyxoviral infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medically important paramyxoviruses, such as measles, mumps, parainfluenza, Nipah, and Hendra viruses, infect host cells by directing fusion of the viral and cellular plasma membranes. Upon infection, paramyxoviruses cause a second type of membrane fusion, cell-cell fusion (syncytium formation), which is linked to pathogenicity. Host cell receptor binding causes conformational changes in the attachment glycoprotein (HN, H, or G) that trigger a conformational cascade in the fusion (F) glycoprotein that mediates membrane fusion. F, a class I fusion protein, contains the archetypal heptad repeat regions 1 (HR1) and 2 (HR2). It is well established that binding of HR1 and HR2 is key to fusing viral and cellular membranes. In this study, we uncovered a novel fusion-modulatory role of a third structurally conserved helical region (HR3) in F. Based on its location within the F structure, and structural differences between its prefusion and postfusion conformations, we hypothesized that the HR3 modulates triggering of the F conformational cascade (still requiring G). We used the deadly Nipah virus (NiV) as an important paramyxoviral model to perform alanine scan mutagenesis and a series of multidisciplinary structural/functional analyses that dissect the various states of the membrane fusion cascade. Remarkably, we found that specific residues within the HR3 modulate not only early F-triggering but also late extensive fusion pore expansion steps in the membrane fusion cascade. Our results characterize these novel fusion-modulatory roles of the F HR3, improving our understanding of the membrane fusion process for NiV and likely for the related Henipavirus genus and possibly Paramyxoviridae family members. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nipah and Hendra viruses (NiV and HeV) exhibit high lethality in humans and are BSL-4 paramyxoviruses in the growing genus, Henipavirus. The attachment (G) and fusion (F) envelope glycoproteins are both required for viral entry into cells and for cell-cell fusion, pathognomonic of henipaviral infections. Here we compared the fusogenic capacities between homologous and heterologous pairs of NiV and HeV glycoproteins. Importantly, to accurately measure their fusogenic capacities, as these depend on glycoprotein cell surface expression (CSE) levels, we inserted identical extracellular tags to both fusion (FLAG tags) or both attachment (HA tags) glycoproteins. Importantly, these tags were placed in extracellular sites where they did not affect glycoprotein expression or function. NiV and HeV glycoproteins induced comparable levels of homologous HEK293T cell-cell fusion. Surprisingly however, while the heterologous NiV F/HeV G (NF/HG) combination yielded a hypofusogenic phenotype, the heterologous HeV F/NiV G (HF/NG) combination yielded a hyperfusogenic phenotype. Pseudotyped viral entry levels primarily corroborated the fusogenic phenotypes of the glycoprotein pairs analyzed. Furthermore, we constructed G and F chimeras that allowed us to map the overall regions in G and F that contributed to these hyperfusogenic or hypofusogenic phenotypes. Importantly, the fusogenic phenotypes of the glycoprotein combinations negatively correlated with the avidities of F/G interactions, supporting the F/G dissociation model of henipaviral-induced membrane fusion, even in the context of heterologous glycoprotein pairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last few decades, flow cytometry has redefined the field of biology, exponentially enhancing our understanding of cells, immunology, and microbiology. Flow cytometry recently gave birth to flow virometry, a new way to detect, analyze, and characterize single viral particles. Detection of viruses by flow cytometry is possible due to improvements in current flow cytometers, calibration, and tuning methods. We summarize the recent birth and novel uses of flow virometry and the progressive evolution of this tool to advance the field of virology. We also discuss the various flow virometry methods used to identify and analyze viruses. We briefly summarize other applications of flow virometry, including: virus detection, quantification, population discrimination, and viral particles’ antigenic properties. Finally, we summarize how viral sorting will allow further progress of flow virometry to relate viral surface characteristics to infectivity properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hendra virus (HeV) is a zoonotic enveloped member of the family Paramyoxviridae. To successfully infect a host cell, HeV utilizes two surface glycoproteins: the attachment (G) protein to bind, and the trimeric fusion (F) protein to merge the viral envelope with the membrane of the host cell. The transmembrane (TM) region of HeV F has been shown to have roles in F protein stability and the overall trimeric association of F. Previously, alanine scanning mutagenesis has been performed on the C-terminal end of the protein, revealing the importance of β-branched residues in this region. Additionally, residues S490 and Y498 have been demonstrated to be important for F protein endocytosis, needed for the proteolytic processing of F required for fusion. To complete the analysis of the HeV F TM, we performed alanine scanning mutagenesis to explore the residues in the N-terminus of this region (residues 487–506). In addition to confirming the critical roles for S490 and Y498, we demonstrate that mutations at residues M491 and L492 alter F protein function, suggesting a role for these residues in the fusion process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]