1. One-to-one volunteer befriending to reduce symptoms of depression in people with intellectual disability: a feasibility RCT
- Author
-
Afia Ali, Emma Mckenzie, Zara Rasoul, Angela Hassiotis, Stefan Priebe, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Rebecca Jones, Monica Panca, Rumana Omar, Sally Finning, Shirley Moore, Christine Roe, and Michael King
- Subjects
intellectual disability ,befriending ,community befriending services ,randomised controlled trial ,pilot study ,depression ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Background: Little is known about the effectiveness of befriending for people with intellectual disability and whether or not befriending improves depressive symptoms and social outcomes. Objective: This pilot trial aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future full-scale randomised controlled trial of one-to-one befriending for people with intellectual disability who had depressive symptoms. Design: This was a parallel-group, two-armed randomised controlled trial incorporating an exploratory economic analysis and a mixed-methods process evaluation. Outcome assessments were conducted at baseline and at 6 months post randomisation by a research assistant who was blind to allocation. We aimed to approach 50 participants, with a view to recruiting 40. Setting: Participants with intellectual disability were recruited from one NHS trust and from referrals to two community befriending services. The intervention was delivered by community befriending services. Participants: Adults with mild or moderate intellectual disability with a score on the Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability of ≥ 5 were included. Those attending a day service/college for ≥ 3 days a week were excluded. Volunteers were aged ≥ 18 years and had no history of prior convictions. Intervention: Participants in the intervention group were matched with a volunteer befriender and were expected to meet once per week for 1 hour, over 6 months. Volunteers recorded activities in a logbook. Volunteers received training and regular supervision. Both groups received usual care and a resource booklet of local activities. Main outcome measures: The feasibility outcomes and progression criteria were recruitment of at least 70% of participants approached; matching of at least 70% of participants in the intervention group to a volunteer; a dropout rate of
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF