Search

Neighborhood socioeconomic context where Latinx children live may influence body weight status. Los Angeles County and Orange County of Southern California both are on the list of the top ten counties with the largest Latinx population in the USA. This heterogeneity allowed us to estimate differential impacts of neighborhood environment on children’s body mass index z-scores by race/ethnicity using novel methods and a rich data source. We geocoded pediatric electronic medical record data from a predominantly Latinx sample and characterized neighborhoods into unique residential contexts using latent profile modeling techniques. We estimated multilevel linear regression models that adjust for comorbid conditions and found that a child’s place of residence independently associates with higher body mass index z-scores. Interactions further reveal that Latinx children living in Middle-Class neighborhoods have higher BMI z-scores than Asian and Other Race children residing in the most disadvantaged communities. Our findings underscore the complex relationship between community racial/ethnic composition and neighborhood socioeconomic context on body weight status during childhood.

Understanding the different modifiable and non-modifiable factors and their positive or negative influence on parental and child satisfaction is essential to providing high-quality perioperative care. The purpose of this review is to focus on the perioperative environment and to report the various modifiable and non-modifiable factors that are associated with satisfaction. We found that factors such as quality of clinician-patient communication, clinician attitudes, teamwork, shared decision-making, and improved perioperative information were associated with increased parent and child satisfaction. Interventions such as preparation programs integrating role-play, teaching of coping skills, and family-centered programs were highly rated by parents and children. Healthcare providers and institutions should consider the above variables when treating children and their parents in the perioperative setting.

Although there has been a rising emphasis on patient-centered care, limited research has assessed differences in patient experience based on ethnicity and language. This study examined differences in quality of care (N = 6945) using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Data were collected between January 2014 and April 2019. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed relationships between ethnicity/language with individual items capturing specific components of care and global hospital evaluations using regression modeling. Compared to English-speaking non-Hispanic White patients, Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients reported more positive interactions with nurses, physicians, and the hospital environment and reported a better understanding of care after discharge. Findings also indicated that Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients were more satisfied with their experience compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients were more satisfied with specific components of care and also scored higher in a measure of the global patient experience. Findings suggest the need for setting clear expectations for health care encounters and adapting health system responses to better capture factors driving Hispanic/Latinx patient satisfaction.

To address gaps in understanding disparities of posttraumatic growth among childhood cancer survivors, the aims of this study were to (1) compare satisfaction, resilience, and achievement among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White survivors; and (2) examine relationships between sociodemographic and clinical factors with satisfaction, resilience, and achievement.Survivors (N = 116) at Children's Hospital of Orange County After Cancer Treatment Survivorship Program completed the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition.Resilience (p = .003) and achievement (p = .005) were lower among Hispanic survivors. Resilience was positively associated with satisfaction (p.01) and achievement (p.01) and achievement was positively associated with years of schooling (p.01). No differences were found between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White satisfaction scores (p = .95).Our findings suggest ethnic disparities in posttraumatic growth in childhood cancer survivors. Interventions aimed at promoting posttraumatic growth are vital to address these differences.

This research examined whether pediatric inpatients without an anxiety/mood disorder are more likely to receive opioids in response to pain compared to patients diagnosed with a mental health condition. Research questions were tested using cross-sectional inpatient electronic medical record data. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with a disorder with patients without the disorder (anxiety analyses: N = 2892; mood analyses: N = 1042). Although patients with anxiety and mood disorders experienced greater pain, physicians were less likely to order opioids for these patients. Analyses also disclosed an interaction of anxiety with pain-the pain-opioid relation was stronger for patients without an anxiety disorder than for patients with an anxiety diagnosis. Instead, physicians were more likely to place non-opioid analgesic orders to manage the pain of patients with anxiety disorders. Findings imply that pain management decisions might be influenced by patient's mental health.

BACKGROUND For young children, existing measures of children's health-related quality of life must be parent-reported or interviewer-administered for those who cannot read or complete measures independently. Parents' and childrens' reports about the child's health have been shown to disagree. AIMS (a) To test the reliability and validity of an animated, computer-administered Child Health Rating Inventories (CHRIS2.0) among children aged 4-12 undergoing surgery; and (b) to develop and test two CHRIS measures of preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain management. METHODS We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of a diverse group of 542 children aged 4-12 undergoing surgery. We compared the CHRIS measures to Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), the Functional Disabilities Inventory (FDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children (STAI-CH), and the Parent Postoperative Pain Measure (PPPM). RESULTS Factor analyses supported the construct validity of the 12-item general physical health and the 8-item mental health CHRIS scales, as well as a composite 20-item scale, and the CHRIS preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain scales. Internal consistency reliability for all CHRIS scales exceeded the standard for group comparisons (Cronbach's α ≥0.70). The CHRIS general health composite was significantly correlated with composite PedsQL and FDI (r = 0.28, P

Cryptorchidism is one of the most common reasons for pediatric urology referral and one of the few pediatric urologic conditions in which there are established AUA guidelines that recommend orchiopexy be performed before 18 months of age. While access to timely orchiopexy has been studied previously, there is no current study with data from a national clinical database evaluating timely orchiopexy after the AUA guidelines were published. Additionally, prior studies on delayed orchiopexy may have included patients with an ascended testis, which is a distinct population from those with true undescended testicles.To evaluate in a national, clinical database if timely orchiopexy improved after the AUA guidelines were published in 2014. In particular, we aim to evaluate a younger group of patients, 0-5 years of age, in an effort to account for potential ascending testes.Using Cerner Real-World Data™, a national, de-identified database of 153 million individuals, we analyzed pediatric patients undergoing orchiopexy in the United States from 2000 to 2021. We included males 0-18 years old and further focused on the subset 0-5 years. Primary outcome was timely orchiopexy, defined as age at orchiopexy less than 18 months. Predictor variables included race, ethnicity and insurance status. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression.Of the total 17,012 individuals identified as undergoing orchiopexy, 9274 were ages 0-5 at the time of surgery. Comparing time periods pre and post AUA guidelines (2000-2014 versus 2015-2021), we found a significant difference in the proportion of timely orchiopexy (51% versus 56%, respectively; p 0.0001) (Figure). In multivariable analyses, Hispanic (OR = 0.65, p 0.0001), African American (OR = 0.74, p 0.0001), and Native American males (OR = 0.66, p = 0.008) were less likely to have timely orchiopexy compared to non-Hispanic White males. Individuals without insurance (OR = 0.81, p = 0.03) or with public insurance (OR = 0.88, p = 0.02) were less likely to have timely orchiopexy as compared to those with private insurance.Nearly a decade after publication of the AUA cryptorchidism guidelines, a large proportion of patients are still not undergoing orchiopexy by 18 months of age. This is the first study to show that timely orchiopexy has improved among patients 0-5 years, but the majority of patients are still not undergoing timely orchiopexy. Health disparities were apparent among Hispanic, African American, Native American, and uninsured males, highlighting the need for further progress in access to pediatric surgical care.

Introduction: Limited access to SARS-CoV-2 testing has been identified as a potential source of anxiety among healthcare workers (HCWs), but the impact of repeated testing on pandemic-related anxiety in pediatric HCWs has not been examined. We sought to understand the impact of repeated SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing on pediatric HCWs COVID-19 anxiety. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study was conducted between April and July 2020. Participants, 362 pediatric HCWs, underwent rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing either every 96 hours or weekly and were asked to rate their COVID-19 anxiety on a visual analog scale. Change in anxiety from baseline was calculated for each testing day response. Bivariate analyses, repeated measures, and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine demographics associated with change in anxiety.Results: Baseline COVID-19 anxiety was significantly higher in HCWs with less than 10 years of experience (Z=-2.63, p=.009), females compared to males (Z=-3.66 pF (3,302)=6.04, p =.003). After excluding participants that received a positive test result, repeated measures analyses indicated that anxiety decreased over time (F (5,835)=3.14, p=.008). Of those HCWs that reported decreased anxiety, 57 (29.8%) had a clinically significant decrease (> 30%) and ED HCWs were 1.97 times more likely to report a clinically significant decrease in anxiety (X2(1) = 5.05, p = .025).Conclusion: Results suggest that repeated SARS-CoV-2 antibody serology testing is associated with decreased COVID-19 anxiety in HCWs. Routine screening for disease may be a helpful strategy to attenuate pandemic-related anxiety in pediatric HCWs.

The purpose of this investigation was to summarize current research on diagnosis, outcomes, and management of frail patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Because frail patients are at increased risk of negative post-operative outcomes including increased 30-day mortality and post-operative complications including infections and delirium, such a review is timely. Strategies including supervised exercise training programs before surgery, early identification of frailty, prophylactic antibiotics, regular drug chart review, regular monitoring of electrolytes, and other strategies to prevent post-operative delirium are helpful in the management of frail orthopedic patients. It is important for surgeons and anesthesiologists to take action in attempt to alleviate adverse post-operative outcomes in frail patients. Ultimately, more research is needed to identify new strategies and to evaluate whether pre-operative optimization can effectively mitigate post-operative outcomes in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association between race/ethnicity and health insurance payer type with pediatric opioid and non-opioid ordering in an inpatient hospital setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional inpatient encounter data from June 2013 to June 2018 was retrieved from a pediatric children’s hospital in Southern California (N = 55,944), and statistical analyses were performed to determine associations with opioid ordering. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect of race/ethnicity on opioid and non-opioid orders. Physicians ordered significantly fewer opioid medications, but a greater number of non-opioid medications, for non-Hispanic African American children than non-Hispanic Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, and non-Hispanic White pediatric patients. There was also a main effect of health insurance payer type on non-opioid orders. Patients with government-sponsored plans (e.g., Medi-Cal, Medicare) received fewer non-opioid prescriptions compared with patients with both HMO and PPO coverage. Additionally, there was a significant race/ethnicity by insurance interaction on opioid orders. Non-Hispanic White patients with “other” insurance coverage received the greatest number of opioid orders. In non-Hispanic African American patients, children with PPO coverage received fewer opioids than those with government-sponsored and HMO insurance. For non-Hispanic Asian patients, children with PPO were prescribed more opioids than those with government-sponsored and HMO coverage. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the relationship between race/ethnicity, insurance type, and physician decisions opioid prescribing is complex and multifaceted. Given that consistency in opioid prescribing should be seen regardless of patient background characteristics, future studies should continue to assess and monitor unequitable differences in care.

Summary Background Recent developments in healthcare have placed increased focus on patient satisfaction. Among adult populations, validated patient satisfaction tools have now been incorporated into routine practice. This process has been much slower and is significantly less standardized in pediatric populations. Objective The objective of this analysis was to evaluate various factors that predict patient satisfaction in pediatric urology settings. Materials and methods Data from the National Research Corporation (NRC) Health Patient Survey were collected from children receiving urological care between 2017 and 2019. Survey data were merged with demographic and visit-related information from electronic health records (EHR). Rating of provider on the NCR Health survey was chosen as the primary outcome. Two multivariable models were analyzed by logistic regression. The first model contained only demographic and clinic-based predictor variables. The second model contained the NRC survey questions. Results This analysis includes a total of 3232 surveys. Multivariable analysis of EHR demographic and visit data found that low income insurance (Medicaid) (OR = 1.3, p = 0.035), primary language Spanish (OR = 1.5, p = 0.012), and shorter in-office wait time (OR = 0.94, p Discussion This analysis has identified several modifiable and non-modifiable variables that predict patient satisfaction in a population of children receiving care in a pediatric urology clinic. Limitations of this study include the possibility for response bias and lack of data on other potentially important but unmeasured factors. Conclusions Certain patient populations are more satisfied with the outpatient urology clinic experience. Several factors related to physician-patient communication are modifiable areas to improve patient satisfaction. Further intervention studies focusing on the modifiable areas are needed to increase patient satisfaction in pediatric urology. Table . Multivariable model of NRC Health survey questions (significant only) Variable P value Provider explanation Provider listened carefully Provider knowledge of medical history Provider's respect for patient 0.002 Enough time with provider Communication between provider and nurses

Previous studies have demonstrated associations between patient experience scores and physician's demographic characteristics such as gender and race. There is a paucity of data, however, on the effect of broader pediatrician characteristics on caregivers' experience of their children's care. This study assessed pediatric caregiver experience of care ratings within a children's hospital and examined the effects of pediatricians' interpersonal and personality traits on caregiver experience ratings.This cross-sectional study included caregivers of children under 18 years old (n = 26,703) and physicians within children's hospital system (n = 65). Caregivers of children who received care from 2017 to 2019 provided their rating (0-10) of care experience via the standardized National Research Corporation Health Survey. Top box provider ratings were used for analyses. Physician's interpersonal and personality data were collected. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine the effects of physician interpersonal characteristics (empathy, compassion) and personality (perfectionism, Big Five personality traits [openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism]) on experience of care rating.The odds of caregivers of Spanish-speaking children to provide a high physician rating were 75% higher than the odds for non-Spanish-speaking patients. At the physician level, lower agreeableness (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, P = .002), and lower narcissistic perfectionism (OR = 0.98, P = .016) were associated with an increased likelihood of a high care experience rating. The odds of nonemergency medicine pediatricians receiving high ratings were approximately 4.17 times higher than that of EM pediatricians.Current results may inform future interventions that address pediatrician personality characteristics associated with caregivers of children experience outcomes.

An unintended consequence of medical technologies is loss of personal interactions and humanism between patients and their healthcare providers, leading to depersonalisation of medicine. As humanism is not integrated as part of formal postgraduate anaesthesiology education curricula, our goal was to design, introduce, and evaluate a comprehensive humanism curriculum into anaesthesiology training.Subject-matter experts developed and delivered the humanism curriculum, which included interactive workshops, simulation sessions, formal feedback, and patient immersion experience. The effectiveness of the programme was evaluated using pre- and post-curriculum assessments in first-year postgraduate trainee doctors (residents).The anaesthesiology residents reported high satisfaction scores. Pre-/post-Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy showed an increase in empathy ratings with a median improvement of 12 points (range; P=0.013). After training, patients rated the residents as more empathetic (31 [4] vs 22 [5]; P0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7-12) and professional (47 [3] vs 35 [8]; P0.001; 95% CI: 9-16). Patient overall satisfaction with their anaesthesia provider improved after training (51 [6] vs 37 [10]; P0.001; 95% CI: 10-18). Patients rated their anxiety lower in the post-training period compared with pretraining (1.8 [2.3] vs 3.6 [1.6]; P=0.001; 95% CI: 0.8-2.9). Patient-reported pain scores decreased after training (2.3 [2.5] vs 3.8 [2.1]; P=0.010; 95% CI: 0.4-2.8).Implementation of a humanism curriculum during postgraduate anaesthesiology training was well accepted, and can result in increased physician empathy and professionalism. This may improve patient pain, anxiety, and overall satisfaction with perioperative care.

Objective There is a need for a brief affect scale that also encompasses different components of affect relevant for researchers interested in physiological and health outcomes. The Subcomponents of Affect Scale (SAS) meets this need. This 18-item scale has nine positive and nine negative affect items encompassing six subscales (calm, well-being, vigour, depression, anxiety, anger). Previous research using the SAS has demonstrated its predictive validity, but no work has tested its subscale structure or longitudinal validity. Design Data from the Common Cold Project in which individuals (N = 610) completed the SAS over the course of seven days were used. Results Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated the reliability of the subscale structure of the SAS across seven days (positive affect subscale structure: CFIs ≥ 0.98; negative affect subscale structure: CFIs ≥ 0.94 with day 6 CFI = 0.91) and tests of factorial invariance showed the scale is valid to use over time. Conclusions These results confirm the psychometric validity of the subscale structure of the SAS and imply that the subscales can be used longitudinally, allowing for its use in health research as well as non-health research that can benefit from its subscale structure and longitudinal capabilities.

Author(s): Heyming, Theodore W; Fortier, Michelle A; Martin, Sarah R; Lara, Bryan; Bacon, Kellie; Kain, Zeev N | Abstract: Background and objectiveThe goal of the present study was to determine the incidence of new onset maladaptive behaviours in paediatric emergency department (PED) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine whether child and parent anxiety and parental health status were predictors for the new-onset of maladaptive behaviours.MethodsParticipants included child-parent dyads seen in a PED following the state's issuance of mandatory stay-at-home orders on 19 March 2020. A total of 351 children age 0-25 years and 335 parents enrolled in the study. Parents provided baseline demographic data and completed standardised surveys that assessed aspects of parental and child anxiety and parental health, as well as child new-onset maladaptive behaviours. Children ≥8 years of age completed surveys that assessed child anxiety.FindingsParents reported the new onset of maladaptive behaviours in children during the pandemic with frequencies up to 43%. Bivariate analysis identified predictors such as child anxiety (t(96)n=n-2.04, Pn= 0.044) as well as parental variables such as state anxiety (t(190)n=n-4.91, Pnl 0.001) and parental sensitivity to anxiety (t(243)n=n-3.19, Pn= 0.002). A logistic regression model identified parent mental health and COVID-19 anxiety as predictors of new onset maladaptive behaviours in children (X2 (6)n=n42.514, Pnl 0.001). Specifically, every unit change in parental anxiety of COVID-19 was associated with a unit increase in maladaptive behaviours in children.ConclusionsWe identified distinct parent and child-related factors that predicted new onset child maladaptive behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. The identification of such predictors may help clinicians to prevent maladaptive responses to the pandemic quarantine.

Background Published data on predictive factors associated with parent satisfaction from care in a pediatric emergency department (ED) visit are limited to be descriptive and obtained from small data sets. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine both modifiable and nonmodifiable demographic and operational factors that influence parental satisfaction using a large and ethnically diverse site data set. Methods Data consist of responses to the National Research Council (NRC) survey questionnaires and electronic medical records of 15,895 pediatric patients seen in a pediatric ED between the ages of 0 and 17 years discharged from May 2018 to September 2019. Bivariate, χ2, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out using the NRC item on rating the ED between 0 and 10 as the primary outcome. Responses were coded using a top-box approach, a response of "9" or "10" represented satisfaction with the facility, and every other response was indicated as undesirable. Demographic data and NRC questionnaire were used as potential predictors. Results Multivariable regression analysis found the following variables as independent predictors for positive parental rating of the ED: Hispanic race/ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.285), primary language Spanish (OR, 2.399), and patients who had government-sponsored insurance (OR, 1.470). Those survey items with the largest effect size were timeliness of care (OR, 0.188) and managing discomfort (OR, 0.412). Conclusions Parental rating of an ED is associated with nonmodifiable variables such as ethnicity and modifiable variables such as timeliness of care and managing discomfort.

Positive emotion, encompassing feelings such as joy and happiness, has been shown to predict a multitude of health outcomes. However, the role of positive emotion in pediatric asthma is not understood. No work to date has examined how positive emotion may offer benefits to children and adolescents with asthma. Based on theory and models of positive emotion and health, we hypothesize that positive emotion may improve asthma outcomes through mediators such as health behaviors and health-relevant physiological functioning. Moreover, boosting positive emotion during times of stress may be particularly relevant in mitigating asthma symptoms. In the present commentary, we elaborate on the hypothesized mechanisms behind such associations grounded within positive emotion theoretical frameworks. Additionally, we summarize the methodologically rigorous work of positive emotion interventions in other clinical settings to propose that positive emotion could be a useful tool in the management of pediatric asthma.

The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative pain scores between children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (TA) surgery and their parents, identify potential predictors for this disagreement, and determine possible impact on analgesic administration.This is a prospective longitudinal study conducted with children undergoing outpatient TA in 4 major tertiary hospitals and their parents. Children and their parents were enrolled prior to surgery and completed baseline psychological instruments assessing parental anxiety (STAI), parental coping style (MBSS), child temperament (EAS) and parental medication administration attitude questionnaire (MAQ). Postoperatively, parents and children completed at-home pain severity ratings (Faces Pain Scale-Revised, children; Numeric Rating Scale, parents) on postoperative recovery days 1, 2, and 3, reflecting an overall pain level for the past 24 h. Parents also completed a log of analgesic administration. Based on postoperative pain scores, parent-child dyads were classified as overestimators (i.e., parents rated their child's pain higher than children rated their own pain), in agreement (i.e., rating in agreement), or underestimators (i.e., parents rated their child's pain lower than children rated their own pain).A significant proportion of parent-child pairs disagreed on pain ratings on postoperative days 1-3 (30.05%-35.95%). Of those pairs in disagreement, the majority of parents overestimated their child's pain on all three postoperative days, specifically such that a total of 24-26% parents overestimated their child's pain on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated that parents in the overestimator group administered higher, though still within safe limits, amounts of ibuprofen and oxycodone (mg/day) than did the underestimator or agreement groups. Multiple regression models showed hospital site as the only independent predictor for postoperative pain rating disagreement between children and parents.Since parents overestimate their child's postoperative pain and may administer more analgesics to their child, it is essential to develop a standardized method of child pain assessment and a tailored recommended postoperative analgesic regimen amongst medical providers for children undergoing TA.

BACKGROUND Children who undergo surgery experience significant pain in the post anesthesia care unit. Nurse and parent behaviors in the post anesthesia care unit directly impact child postoperative pain. Therefore, we have developed and evaluated (Phase 1) and then tested (Phase 2) the feasibility of a new intervention (Nurse and Parent Training in Postoperative Stress) to alter parent and nurse behaviors in a way consistent with reducing child postoperative pain. METHODS In Phase 1, a multidisciplinary team of experts (physicians, nurses, and psychologists) developed an empirically-based intervention which was then evaluated by experienced nurses (N = 8) and parents (N = 9) during focus groups. After revising the intervention based on focus group feedback, it was tested in Phase 2 using a pre-post study design. Nurses (N = 23) who worked in the recovery room were recruited to be part of both pre- and post-intervention data collection periods. Parents were recruited to be part of either the pre- (N = 52) or post-intervention (N = 60) data collection periods. Nurses and parent-child dyads were recorded in the post anesthesia care unit and videos were coded for the desired (ie, behaviors that may decrease child pain) and non-desired (ie, behaviors that may increase child pain) behaviors. Pain data was collected from the children's medical records to assess pain after surgery. The intervention was given to the nurses and parents in the post-intervention data collection period. RESULTS Nurses significantly increased their rate of desired behaviors by 231% (P = 0.001; Somer's D = 1) and significantly decreased their rate of non-desired behaviors by 62% (P = 0.004, Somer's D = -0.88, 95% CI [-1.74, -0.03]). Parents significantly increased their rate of desired behaviors by 124% (P = 0.033). Moreover, the intervention significantly decreased child pain in the post anesthesia care unit (b = -2.19, SE = 0.63, z = -3.46, P = 0.001, 95%CI [-3.43, -0.95]). CONCLUSION The intervention was effective in changing nurse and parent behaviors as well as child pain after surgery.

Background Racial/ethnic disparities in the use of opioids to treat pain disorders have been previously reported in the emergency department (ED). Further research is needed to better evaluate the impact race/ethnicity may have on the use of opioids in adolescents for the management of pain disorders in the ED. Methods This was a cross-sectional study using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2006 to 2016. Multivariate models were used to evaluate the role of race/ethnicity in the receipt of opioid agonists while in the ED. All ED visits with patients aged 11–21 years old were analyzed. Races/ethnicities were stratified as non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanics. In addition to race, statistical analysis included the following covariates: pain score, pain diagnosis, age, region, sex, and payment method. Results There was a weighted total of 189,256,419 ED visits. Those visits involved 109,826,315 (58%) non-Hispanic Whites, 46,314,977 (24%) non-Hispanic Blacks, and 33,115,127 (18%) Hispanics, with 21.6% (95% CI, 21.1%-22.1), 15.2% (95% CI, 14.6–15.9%), and 17.4% (95% CI, 16.5–18.2%) of those visits reporting use of opioids, respectively. Regardless of age, sex, and region, non-Hispanic Whites received opioids at a higher rate than non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics. Based on diagnosis, non-Hispanic Whites received opioids at a higher rate in multiple pain diagnoses. Additionally, non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to receive an opioid when reporting moderate pain (aOR = 0.738, 95% CI 0.601–0.906, aOR = 0.739, 95% CI 0.578–0.945, respectively) and severe pain (aOR = 0.580, 95% CI 0.500–0.672, aOR = 0.807, 95% CI 0.685–0.951, respectively) compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Conclusions Differences in the receipt of opioid agonists in EDs among the races/ethnicities exist, with more non-Hispanic Whites receiving opioids than their minority counterparts. Non-Hispanic Black women may be an especially marginalized population. Further investigation into sex-based and regional differences are needed.

Background Receipt of opioid prescriptions in pediatric and young adult patients may be a risk factor for future opioid misuse. Data from prescription drug monitoring programs provide insight on outpatient opioid use. In our study, we analyzed the opioid dispensing rates for pediatrics and young adults in California. Methods A secondary analysis was performed from 2015-2019 using Controlled Utilization Review and Evaluation System data. This database provides dispensing data of controlled substances in California. Patients younger than 25 years who were prescribed opiates were analyzed by county. We further divided them into two groups (children: ≤14 years; adolescents and young adult: 15-24 years). Descriptive statistics and heat maps were used to illustrate the trends in opioid usage among different age groups. Results The overall percentages for the number of opioids being dispensed to patients aged 2.9% of opioids dispensed to patients younger than 25 years old; in 2019, this number reduced to zero. Patients 25 and older received a higher proportion of opioids compared to younger populations; in 2019, 35.91% of opioids were dispensed to patients 45-64, and 8.92% to patients younger than 25. Conclusion Pediatric opioid prescriptions have declined over the recent years. However, a high degree of variability of prescription rates between demographic counties was noted. More studies are warranted in order to understand this discrepancy in opioid prescribing among pediatric and young adult patients.

Although there has been a rising emphasis on patient-centered care, limited research has assessed differences in patient experience based on ethnicity and language.This study examined differences in quality of care (N = 6945) using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Data were collected between January 2014 and April 2019. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed relationships between ethnicity/language with individual items capturing specific components of care and global hospital evaluations using regression modeling.Compared to English-speaking non-Hispanic White patients, Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients reported more positive interactions with nurses, physicians, and the hospital environment and reported a better understanding of care after discharge. Findings also indicated that Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients were more satisfied with their experience compared to non-Hispanic White patients.Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx patients were more satisfied with specific components of care and also scored higher in a measure of the global patient experience. Findings suggest the need for setting clear expectations for health care encounters and adapting health system responses to better capture factors driving Hispanic/Latinx patient satisfaction.

Hypotension is common in critically ill patients. Early prediction of hypotensive events in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) allows clinicians to pre-emptively treat the patient and avoid possible organ damage. In this study, we investigate the performance of various supervised machine-learning classification algorithms along with a real-time labeling technique to predict acute hypotensive events in the ICU. It is shown that logistic regression and SVM yield a better combination of specificity, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Logistic regression is able to predict 85% of events within 30 minutes of their onset with 81% PPV and 96% specificity, while SVM results in 96% specificity, 83% sensitivity and 82% PPV. To further reduce the false alarm rate, we propose a high-level decision-making algorithm that filters isolated false positives identified by the machine-learning algorithms. By implementing this technique, 24% of the false alarms are filtered. This saves 21 hours of medical staff time through 2,560 hours of monitoring and significantly reduces the disturbance caused by alarming monitors.

Objectives Using multiple well-validated measures and a large sample size, the goal of this paper was to describe the immediate clinical and behavioral recovery of children following tonsillectomy with or without an adenoidectomy (T&A) during the first two weeks following surgery. Study design Observational, longitudinal study. Setting Four major pediatric hospitals in the U.S. consisting of Children's Hospital of Orange County, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, and Children's Hospital Colorado. Subjects and Methods: Participants included 827 patients between 2 and 15 years of age who underwent tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy surgery. Baseline and demographic information were gathered prior to surgery, and measures of clinical, behavioral, and physical recovery were recorded immediately following and up through two weeks after surgery. Results Pain following T&A was clinically significant through the first post-operative week and nearly resolved by the end of the second week. Negative behavioral changes were highly prevalent after surgery (75.6% of children at Day 0) through the first week (63.9% at Week 1), and over 20% of children continued to evidence new onset negative behavioral changes at two weeks post-operatively. Children were rated as experiencing significant functional impairment in the immediate three days following surgery and most children returned to baseline functioning by the end of the second week. Conclusions Results of this study suggest that children show immediate impairment in functioning and experience clinically significant pain throughout the first week following T&A, and new onset maladaptive behavioral changes persisting even up to the two-week assessment period.

Objective Within the context of the United States opioid epidemic, some parents often fear the use of opioids to help manage their children's postoperative pain. As a possible consequence, parents often do not dispense optimal analgesic medications to their children after surgery, putting their children at risk of suffering from postsurgical pain. The objective of this research was to assess ethnicity as a predictor of both pain and opioid consumption, and to examine how Hispanic/Latinx and Non-Hispanic White parents alter their child's opioid consumption in response to significant postsurgical pain. Methods Participants were 254 children undergoing outpatient tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy surgery and their parents. Longitudinal multilevel modeling examined changes in both parent-reported pain and hydrocodone/APAP consumption (mg/kg) on days 1 to 7 after surgery. Results Parent reports of postoperative pain were higher in Hispanic/Latinx patients compared to their Non-Hispanic White counterparts (β = −0.15; 95% CI: −0.28, −0.01). There was also a significant interaction of ethnicity and pain on opioid consumption (β = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.13). The relationship between parent perceived pain and opioid use was stronger for Non-Hispanic White children, suggesting that this group was more likely to consume opioids to help manage clinically significant postsurgical pain. Conclusions Hispanic/Latinx children might be at risk for undertreatment of surgical pain. Findings highlight the importance of assessing parent background and cultural beliefs as predictors of at home pain management and the potential effectiveness of tailored interventions that educate parents about monitoring and treating child postoperative pain.

Despite advances in health care, the majority of children undergoing cancer treatment experience pain, particularly in the home setting. Mobile health tools provide a promising avenue to deliver pain management education and information to parents of children receiving cancer treatment. The current study describes the development and formative evaluation of a novel intervention, Cancer-Tailored Intervention for Pain and Symptoms (C-TIPS), which provides empirically-based pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain management information and coping skills training to parents of pediatric cancer patients. C-TIPS is a web-based application including a tailoring algorithm, customization tools, guided diaphragmatic breathing training, relaxation practice, and educational material (COPE modules). Thirty parents of children undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer participated in this initial mixed methods pilot study. Participants completed quantitative measures assessing their stress and relaxation ratings and satisfaction with C-TIPS. Formative evaluation and qualitative data were collected using individual and group interviews.Parents reported high satisfaction with both the educational and skills training modules of C-TIPS (ps 0.001). Parent self-reported stress significantly reduced (p = 0.004) and relaxation increased (p = 0.05) following participation with the skills training module.C-TIPS is a feasible and well-received web-based intervention that promises to improve pain management in children undergoing cancer treatment, improve stress management in parents, and increase parents' knowledge and understanding of their child's cancer treatment. Results from the current study will help make improvements to C-TIPS in preparation for a randomized-controlled trial of this innovative program.

BACKGROUND: There is a large body of literature examining factors associated with children’s pre-operative anxiety; however, cultural variables such as ethnicity and language have not been included. AIM: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the role of Latino ethnicity and Spanish-speaking families in pediatric pre-operative anxiety. METHODS: Participants were 294 children aged 2–15 years of age undergoing outpatient, elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy surgery and general anesthesia. Participants were recruited and categorized into three groups: English-speaking non-Latino White (n = 139), English-speaking Latino (n = 88), and Spanish-speaking Latino (n = 67). Children’s anxiety was rated at two time points before surgery: the time the child entered the threshold of the operating room (Induction 1) and the time when the anesthesia mask was placed (Induction 2). RESULTS: Results from separate linear regression models at Induction 1 and Induction 2 respectively showed that being from a Spanish-speaking Latino family was associated with higher levels of pre-operative anxiety compared with being from an English-speaking family. In addition, young age and low sociability was associated with higher pre-operative anxiety in children. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that younger, less sociable children of Spanish-speaking Latino parents are at higher risk of developing pre-operative anxiety and manage these children based on this increased risk.

Purpose of review The review examines the different preventive measures that have been found to be useful to abolish or decrease the negative effects of burnout and increase resilience in anesthesiologists. Recent findings Studies in anesthesiology cite autonomy, control of the work environment, professional relationships, leadership, and organizational justice as the most important factors in job satisfaction. Factors such as difficulty in balancing personal and professional life, poor attention to wellness, work alcoholism, and genetic factors increase an individual's susceptibility to burnout. Exposure to chronic or repeated stress instigates a spectrum of autonomic, endocrine, immunologic, and behavioral responses that activate the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Investigating the difference in psychobiologic reactivity, as well as defining the psychological symptoms that are characteristic to individuals vulnerable to stress-induced illness, would enable scientists to better look into the modalities to eradicate the negative effects. Recent studies have shown that a combination of individual and structural changes in institutions can increase resilience in physicians. Summary Burnout is a pathological syndrome that is triggered by constant levels of high stress. A combination of individual efforts as well as structural interventions can help to increase wellbeing in physicians.

Background: This is a cross-sectional study. Our objective is to survey spine surgeons’ views of responsibility to reduce healthcare costs, enthusiasm for cost reduction strategies, and agreement regarding roles in cost containment. The rising cost of healthcare has spurred debate about reducing expenditures. Previous studies have found that attitudes of anesthesiologists are predominantly in alignment with those of American physicians, but less is known about the views of spine surgeons. Methods: After obtaining institutional approval, an electronic survey was disseminated to active members of AO Spine North America (AOSNA) via email. Respondents were asked eight questions about their age, gender, years in practice, practice facility, political views and opinions regarding management of healthcare costs. Results: From 91 respondents, most were under the age of 60 years (87%), male (96%), and in practice for less than 30 years (91%), practiced at university hospitals (47%) and held politically conservative views (47%). Most responsibility was allocated to hospital and health systems, health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and device manufacturers. Respondents were most enthusiastic about rooting out fraud and abuse and aware of their role in managing the cost of healthcare. Spine surgeons who were in practice for longer were more enthusiastic about reducing cost by reducing overall physician reimbursement via bundled payments, Medicare payment reduction, ending fee-for-service, penalizing surgeons for patient readmissions, and lowering compensation to individual spine surgeons. Conclusions: Spine surgeons allocated responsibility to reduce healthcare costs to healthcare systems, were most enthusiastic about eliminating wasteful spending, and were in agreement regarding their responsibility to control the costs of healthcare. Compared to US physicians of various specialties and anesthesiologists, spine surgeons assigned less responsibility to trials lawyers and expressed markedly less enthusiasm for limiting access to expensive treatments.

Telemedicine has increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our objective was to determine if patient satisfaction with telemedicine differed from in-person visits in an academic pediatric urology clinic. Following outpatient telemedicine and in-person pediatric urology visits, the validated NRC Health© Patient Survey was used to assess patient experience. Patient satisfaction was assessed on a 10-point scale with scores of 9–10 considered “satisfied” and 1–8 considered “not satisfied.” Satisfaction scores between telemedicine and in-person groups were compared using McNemar’s test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and conditional logistic regression. Fifty-one patients had urology telemedicine visits during April–August 2020 and completed the NRC Health© Patient Survey. Propensity score matching was used to identify 102 in-person controls between January 2019 and March 2020. Ninety-two percent of telemedicine patients were satisfied compared to 87% of in-person patients (OR 1.7 95% CI [0.53–5.6]). Regression analysis adjusting for matching variables demonstrated that patient satisfaction was higher for telemedicine compared to in-person visits but was not statistically significant (OR 1.5 95% CI [0.43–5.6]). Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was similar to in-person visits in the pediatric urology clinic. Reduced waiting time and convenience associated with telemedicine visits provide an opportunity for telemedicine as a useful modality for pediatric urology.

Several federal agencies have recently noted that the United States is in the midst of an unprecedented "opioid epidemic," with an increasing number of opioid-related overdoses and deaths. Providers currently face 3 population-level, public health challenges in providing optimal perioperative pain care: (1) the continued lack of overall improvement in the excessive incidence of inadequately treated postoperative pain, (2) minimizing or preventing postoperative opioid-related side effects, and (3) addressing current opioid prescribing patterns, and the accompanying problematic surge in prescription opioid diversion, misuse, abuse, addiction, and overdose. In the Perioperative Surgical Home model, anesthesiologists and other pain medicine specialists are uniquely qualified and positioned to develop, implement, and coordinate a comprehensive perioperative analgesic plan, which begins with the formal preoperative patient assessment and continues throughout the postdischarge, convalescence period. The scope and practice of pain management within the Perioperative Surgical Home should thus (a) expand to include routine preoperative patient-level pain-risk stratification (including the chronic use of opioid and nonopioid analgesics), (b) address the multitude of biopsychosocial factors that contribute to interpatient pain variability, and (c) extend and be well coordinated across all 4 phases of the surgical pain experience (preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and postdischarge). Specifically, safe and effective perioperative pain management should include a plan of care that is tailored to the individual patient's underlying disease(s), presence of a chronic pain condition and preoperative use of opioids, and the specific surgical procedure-with evidence-based, multimodal analgesic regimens being applied in the vast majority of cases. An iteratively evolutionary component of an existing institutional Perioperative Surgical Home program can be an integrated Transitional Pain Service, which is modeled directly after the well-established prototype at the Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada. This multidisciplinary, perioperative Transitional Pain Service seeks to modify the pain trajectories of patients who are at increased risk of (a) long-term, increasing, excessive opioid consumption and/or (b) developing chronic postsurgical pain. Like the Perioperative Surgical Home program in which it can be logically integrated, such a Transitional Pain Service can serve as the needed but missing linkage to improve the continuum of care and perioperative pain management for elective, urgent, and emergent surgery. Even if successfully and cost-efficiently embedded within an existing Perioperative Surgical Home, a new perioperative Transitional Pain Service will require additional resources.

Background Predicting hypotension well in advance provides physicians with enough time to respond with proper therapeutic measures. However, the real-time prediction of hypotension with high positive predictive value (PPV) is a challenge. This is due to the dynamic changes in patients’ physiological status following drug administration, which limits the quantity of useful data available for the algorithm. Method To mimic real-time monitoring, we developed a machine-learning algorithm that uses most of the available data points from patients’ records to train and test the algorithm. The algorithm predicts hypotension up to 30 min in advance based on the data from only 5 min of patient physiological history. A novel evaluation method is also proposed to assess the performance of the algorithm as a function of time at every timestamp within 30 min of hypotension onset. This evaluation approach provides statistical tools to find the best possible prediction window. Results During about 181,000 min of monitoring of 400 patients, the algorithm demonstrated 94% accuracy, 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity in predicting hypotension within 30 min of the events. A high PPV of 81% was obtained, and the algorithm predicted 80% of hypotensive events 25 min prior to onset. It was shown that choosing a classification threshold that maximizes the F1 score during the training phase contributes to a high PPV and sensitivity. Conclusions This study demonstrates the promising potential of machine-learning algorithms in the real-time prediction of hypotensive events in ICU settings based on short-term physiological history.