Search

Our study aims to investigate the serum levels of anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA) isotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and clarify ANuA isotypes that may diagnose and predict SLE. We detected anti-nucleosome antibodies (ANuA) in the serum from 120 patients with SLE, 99 patients suffering from other autoimmune diseases (OAD), and 50 healthy controls by performing IgG-, IgA-, and IgM-specific ELISAs. The serum levels of total anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA IgG), ANuA IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4), anti-dsDNA antibodies, and the avidities of ANA IgG were also analysed using ELISAs. The levels of three ANuA isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) were significantly higher in patients with SLE than in patients with OAD and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, the concentrations of ANuA isotypes increased in the active SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) groups and in patients with SLE presenting high-avidity IgG ANA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ANuA isotype levels decreased significantly with drug therapy, while anti-dsDNA IgG levels decreased with the same trend. Additionally, ANuA isotypes were positively related to the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) score, RAI (relative avidity index) of high-avidity IgG ANAs, and serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels. Last, the sensitivity and specificity values for SLE were 83.33 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 85.83 and 93.33% for ANuA IgA, and83.33 and 86.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values for LN were 61.67 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 49.17 and 96.67% for ANuA IgA, and 52.50 and 96.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. In conclusion, we evaluated whether ANuA isotypes represent a diagnostic tool to predict SLE activity and define subsets of patients with LN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Previous studies had demonstrated that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) levels were elevated in preeclampsia (PE). However, the conclusion remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between blood and placenta HMGB1 levels and PE in pregnant women. Methods: After a systematic literature search, eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The extracted data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies were included, with a total of 1145 participants. Compared with normal pregnancies, pregnant women with PE had significantly higher blood HMGB1 levels (SMD = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.72–1.95, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the expression of placental HMGB1 in PE was higher than that in normal controls by using Western blot (MD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27–0.47, p < 0.00001) or immunohistochemistry (OR = 6.36, 95% CI: 1.48–27.25, p = 0.01). In addition, the blood HMGB1 levels were positively correlated with the severity of PE, with higher blood HMGB1 levels in severe PE than those in mild PE (SMD = 3.35, 95% CI: 0.63–6.06, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis indicated a close association of blood HMGB1 with PE in the Asian group, but not in the European group. Conclusion: Both blood and placental HMGB1 levels in patients with PE were significantly elevated, and higher blood HMGB1 levels indicated a more serious disease condition, suggesting that higher levels of HMGB1 were associated with the risk of PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]