Search

Multiple chronic conditions (MCC) require complex patient-centered approaches with effective provider-patient communication.To describe trends in patient perceptions of provider-patient communication during non-emergency care and identify associated racial disparities in US older adults with MCC.Observational study using pooled US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2013-2019) data included adults65 with two or more chronic conditions.Provider-patient communication was measured by four indicators (how often their doctor explained things clearly, listened carefully, showed respect, and spent enough time with them). The primary outcomes were the annual rates of reporting "always" for the communication indicators. Cochran-Armitage trend tests examined the trends of reporting "always" and associated racial disparities. Multivariable logistic regression identified racial and other factors associated with respondents choosing "always" for one or more categories for provider-patient communication, defined as positive communication.Among 9758 older adults with MCC, declining trends for positive communication were shown across all provider-patient communication categories during 2013 to 2019 (p0.001). The greatest decrease occurred in "always listening carefully", from 68.6% in 2013 to 59.1% in 2019 (p0.001). The declining trends of four communication measures in non-Hispanic Whites with MCC were significant (p0.001). Older adults from Hispanic or Non-Hispanic Black racial backgrounds were 28 to 51% more likely to report "always" for the four indicators of provider-patient communication than non-Hispanic Whites after adjusting for respondents' characteristics.The rates of "always" reporting positive communication with providers significantly declined from 2013 to 2019 in older adults with MCC, particularly in non-Hispanic Whites. Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to report positive communication with providers than other races.

Background Cancer increases the risk of developing one or more chronic conditions, yet little research describes the associations between health care costs, utilization patterns, and chronic conditions in adults with cancer. The objective of this study was to examine the treated prevalence of chronic conditions and the association between chronic conditions and health care expenses in US adults with cancer. Methods This retrospective observational study used US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Household Component (2010–2015) data sampling adults diagnosed with cancer and one or more of 18 select chronic conditions. The measures used were treated prevalence of chronic conditions, and total and chronic condition-specific health expenses (per-person, per-year). Generalized linear models assessed chronic condition-specific expenses in adults with cancer vs. without cancer and the association of chronic conditions on total health expenses in adults with cancer, respectively, by controlling for demographic and health characteristics. Accounting for the complex survey design in MEPS, all data analyses and statistical procedures applied longitudinal weights for national estimates. Results Among 3657 eligible adults with cancer, 83.9% (n = 3040; representing 16 million US individuals per-year) had at least one chronic condition, and 29.7% reported four or more conditions. Among those with cancer, hypertension (59.7%), hyperlipidemia (53.6%), arthritis (25.6%), diabetes (22.2%), and coronary artery disease (18.2%) were the five most prevalent chronic conditions. Chronic conditions accounted for 30% of total health expenses. Total health expenses were $6388 higher for those with chronic conditions vs. those without (p Conclusions In US adults with cancer, the treated prevalence of common chronic conditions was high and health expenses associated with chronic conditions were higher than those without cancer. A holistic treatment plan is needed to improve cost outcomes.

Objectives: There is debate on whether the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) increases the risk of clinical failure in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by chromosomally-mediated AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (CAE). This study evaluates the impact of definitive 3GC therapy versus other antibiotics on clinical outcomes in BSIs due to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult hospitalized patients with BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species from 1 January 2006 to 1 September 2014. Definitive 3GC therapy was compared to definitive therapy with other non-3GC antibiotics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the impact of definitive 3GC on overall treatment failure (OTF) as a composite of in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, or 90-day reinfection. Results: A total of 381 patients from 18 institutions in the southeastern United States were enrolled. Common sources of BSIs were the urinary tract and central venous catheters (78 (20.5%) patients each). Definitive 3GC therapy was utilized in 65 (17.1%) patients. OTF occurred in 22/65 patients (33.9%) in the definitive 3GC group vs. 94/316 (29.8%) in the non-3GC group (p = 0.51). Individual components of OTF were comparable between groups. Risk of OTF was comparable with definitive 3GC therapy vs. definitive non-3GC therapy (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.51&ndash, 1.72) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Conclusions: These outcomes suggest definitive 3GC therapy does not significantly alter the risk of poor clinical outcomes in the treatment of BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species compared to other antimicrobial agents.

OBJECTIVE This study assessed home health care use associated with Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD) in US community dwelling older adults, including workforce, intensity, and cost outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2010-2018) household and home care event files were used to identify adults ≥ 65 years with ADRD. Outcomes included home health care provider type, intensity of care use, and annual direct home care cost. All analyses applied person weights for national estimates. RESULTS Among the 20,443 eligible older adults, 4.2% (n = 843) reported ADRD. Among all professional and non-professional health care workers, nurse practitioners (NPs, 38.5%) and home health care aids (35.6%) were most used. Comparing ADRD vs non-ADRD: the annual per-person average number of days in home care was 110 vs. 64 (p

Jun Wu,1 Mary L Davis-Ajami,2 Zhiqiang K Lu3 1Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, Clinton, SC, USA; 2Department of Science of Nursing Care, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; 3Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA Purpose: Migraine prevalence increases in people with obesity, and obesity may contribute to migraine chronicity. Yet, few studies examine the effect of comorbid migraine on health care utilization and expenses in obese US adults. This study aimed to identify risk factors for migraine and compare the use of health care services and expenses between migraineurs and non-migraineurs in obese US adults.Subjects and methods: This 7-year retrospective study used longitudinal panel data from 2006 to 2013 from the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to identify obese adults reporting migraines. Outcomes compared in migraineurs vs non-migraineurs were as follows: annualized per-person medical care, prescription drug, and total health expenses.Results: In 23,596 obese adults, 4.7% reported migraine (n=1,025) approximating 3 million civilian noninstitutionalized US individuals. Logistic regression showed that the following sociodemographic characteristics increased migraine risk: age (18–45 years), females, White race, poor perceived health status, and greater Charlson comorbidity index. Migraineurs showed US$1,401 (P=0.007), US$813 (P

Objective: CMS reimbursement regulations for telemedicine changed after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to assess telemedicine utilization patterns offered by health care providers and used by Medicare beneficiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020.Methods: This study used the Fall 2020 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) supplemental COVID-19 survey to identify Medicare beneficiaries (≥ 65 years) with a regular place for medical care that offered telemedicine during 2020. Major outcomes: prevalence for whether telemedicine was offered before and during the pandemic, telemedicine use, and digital access to telemedicine. Logistic regression identified the demographic factors associated with telemedicine use.Results: The study sample included 4,380 eligible individual Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years. Of those, 42.9% made telemedicine visits during the pandemic. Approximately 60% of the telemedicine visits were conducted via telephone. Telemedicine was offered to 18% of the respondents before the pandemic vs. 64% during year 2020 of the pandemic. Among telemedicine users, 57.2%, 28.3%, and 14.5% used voice calls, video calls, and both voice and video calls for health care appointments, respectively. Overall telemedicine use varied by sex, race, and region. Individuals 65-74 years, female, living in a metropolitan area, with higher incomes were more likely to make video visits. Experience using telecommunications via the internet influenced telemedicine use significantly.Conclusions: Telemedicine offered to older Medicare beneficiaries increased dramatically after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, less than half used telemedicine and differences in utilization existed by demographic characteristics.

Objectives To describe prescribing patterns of metformin in low-income and Medicaid-insured patients with prediabetes and to identify common demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions of low-income and Medicaid-insured patients receiving metformin for treatment of prediabetes. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting and participants Patients (18-60 years old) who were enrolled in South Carolina Medicaid and diagnosed with prediabetes between January 2009 and December 2013. Main outcome measures Metformin prescribing to treat prediabetes identified from pharmacy claims. Results Among 7102 patients who met the study criteria, 7.4% (n = 520) were prescribed metformin for prediabetes. Nearly 45% (n = 238) of eligible patients prescribed metformin initiated treatment within 30 days after diagnosis of prediabetes. Twenty-five percent of those prescribed metformin took 280 days or longer to initiate treatment after diagnosis of prediabetes. Older age, black race, managed care plan, comorbid hypertension and obesity, and longer enrollment period significantly increased the likelihood of metformin prescribing to treat prediabetes. Conclusion Prevalence of metformin prescription to treat prediabetes is less than 8% in low-income and Medicaid-insured patients. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbid conditions influenced metformin prescribing in the low-income population.

To assess the effect of regular exercise on health care utilization patterns and expenses in a real-world national sample of overweight and obese US adults with diabetes.Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2010-2015) identified adults with diabetes and a body mass index (kg/maverage total health care expenses (per-person per-annum) and the likelihood of hospitalization.Among 5140 overweight and obese adults with diabetes, 49.1% reported exercising at least five times weekly. The exercise group showed lower medical care and prescription drug utilization than the non-exercise group (p0.001). Total unadjusted health expenses in the exercise group were $5651 lower than the non-exercise group (p0.001). After controlling for socioeconomic and health-related variables, regular exercise reduced total health care expenses by 22.1% (p0.001) and the likelihood of hospitalization by 28% (p=0.001).Reduced hospitalization and health care expenses were associated with regular exercise (≥30min at least five times weekly) in overweight and obese adults with diabetes.

The gap between treatment guidelines and clinical practice in prediabetes management has been identified in previous studies. The knowledge related to addressing lifestyle change during office visits in clinical practice to manage prediabetes is limited.To describe patterns of lifestyle management addressed during office-based visits involving patients with prediabetes and identify factors associated with addressing lifestyle management during physician office visits in the USA.Cross-sectional study PARTICIPANTS: US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data from 2013 to 2015 were combined to identify office-based visits involving patients with prediabetes.The major outcome is lifestyle management including diet/nutrition, exercise, and/or weight reduction. Patient and physician characteristics were collected for analysis. The prevalence and patterns of addressing lifestyle management during visits were estimated and described. Multivariate logistic regression model identified significant factors associated with lifestyle management. The patient visit weight was applied to all analyses to achieve nationally representative estimates.Among 4039 office-based visits involving patients with prediabetes between 2013 and 2015, 22.8% indicated lifestyle management was addressed during the visits. Diet/nutrition, exercise, and weight reduction accounted for 86.1%, 62.6%, and 34.1% of the visits with lifestyle management addressed, respectively. Lifestyle management was more likely to be addressed during the visits involving patients with hyperlipidemia (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.46) and obesity (OR = 4.03, 95% CI 2.91-5.56), seeing primary physicians (vs. other specialties, OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.08), and living in the southern region (vs. northeast, OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.20-3.19).The prevalence of addressing lifestyle management during office visits involving patients with prediabetes remained low in the USA. Patients' clinical characteristics, geographic region, and physician's specialty were associated with addressing lifestyle management during the visits.