Search

BackgroundRace and socioeconomic status influence outcomes for adult and pediatric burn patients, yet the impact of these factors on elderly patients (Medicare eligible, 65 years of age) remains unknown.MethodsData pooled from three verified burn centers from 2004 to 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Age, race, gender, percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burn, mortality, length of stay (LOS), LOS per %TBSA burn, and zip code which provided Census data on race, poverty, and education levels within a community were collected. Data were analyzed using logistic and generalized linear models in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).ResultsOur population was mainly Caucasian (63%), African American (18%), Hispanic (7.6%), and Asian (3.5%). Mean age was 76.3 ± 8.3 years, 52.5% were male. Mean %TBSA was 9 ± 13.8%; 15% of the patients sustained an inhalation injury. The mortality rate was 14.4%. Inhalation injury was significantly associated with mortality and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (p < 0.05). Race was significantly associated with socioeconomic disparities and affected LOS/TBSA, but not discharge to SNF or mortality on univariate analysis. Poverty level, education level, and insurance status (others vs. public) independently predicted SNF discharge, while median income and insurance type independently predicted LOS/TBSA.ConclusionIn this elderly cohort, race did not predict standard markers of burn outcome (mortality and discharge to SNF). Socioeconomic status independently predicted LOS and discharge to SNF, suggesting a relationship between socioeconomic status and recovery from a burn injury. Better understanding of racial and socioeconomic disparities is necessary to provide equitable treatment of all patients.

PurposeClinicians anecdotally noted that elderly patients who suffered from traumatic injuries (falls or other injuries) often re-present and are readmitted with fall injuries. Herein, we hypothesized that fall injuries and fall-related deaths and readmissions are increasing over time, and assessed whether the overall rates of death, hospital admission, and 30-day readmission due to falls increased from 2010 to 2014 in the elderly population (≥65) in the US.Patients and methodsThe WHO mortality database and the National Readmission Database (NRD) were queried to assess rates of deaths and hospital admissions and 30-day readmissions associated with fall injuries in the elderly population that presented with trauma. Descriptive statistics were obtained. The generalized linear mixed modeling (GLMM) framework was utilized to examine the relationship between fixed-effect predictor variables and the dichotomous outcome, indicating readmission within 30 days of previous discharge while accounting for hospital clustering with a random intercept.ResultsFall-related death increased by 1.4% from 2010 to 2014. Similarly, the hospital admission rate increased by 2% and was mainly associated with increased admission of elderly 65-74 years old. Approximately 55% of the fall patients were placed in nursing facilities in 2010, and this rate increased by 3% from 2010 to 2014. Thirty-day readmission rates for fall and trauma patients remained stable from 2010 to 2014. However, the rate of fall patients readmitted within 30 days for a subsequent fall increased from 15.6% to 17.4% between 2010 and 2014.ConclusionOur data indicate a steady increase in deaths and admissions for fall injuries in the elderly population. Strikingly, the incidence of readmission for a subsequent fall is increasing. With the aging population, this trend is likely to continue and highlights the need for elderly social support systems and fall prevention programs.

Background: Vision impairment (VI) is associated with falls in older adults. However, past studies have relied on geographically constrained samples with limited generalizability or self‐reports of visual difficulty. To date, there have not been nationally representative studies on the association of objective measures of visual function and falls outcomes. Methods: We used cross‐sectional data from Round 11 of National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative panel study of age‐eligible Medicare beneficiaries (N = 2951). We performed Poisson regression to calculate the prevalence and prevalence ratio (PR) of >1 fall in the past year, any fall in the past month, fear of falling (FoF), and activity limitation due to FoF as a function of distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Models were adjusted for demographic and health covariates and were weighted to make nationally representative parameter estimates. Results: The weighted proportion of participants with VI was 27.6% (95% CI, 25.4%–29.9%). Individuals with any VI had a higher prevalence of falls compared with those without VI (18.5% vs. 14.1%, PR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53). Specifically, contrast sensitivity impairment was associated with a higher prevalence of recurrent falls (20.8% vs. 14.7%; PR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.01–1.67) and recent falls (17.1% vs. 9.9%; PR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.94). This relationship existed even independent of near and distance visual acuity. Distance and near visual acuity were not significantly associated with falls. Having any VI was also associated with a higher prevalence of FoF (38.4% vs. 30.5%, PR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02–1.34). Conclusion: The prevalence of falls is associated with poor contrast sensitivity but not with near or distance visual acuity. Findings suggest greater collaboration between geriatricians and eye care providers may be warranted to assess and address fall risk in older adults with VI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Existing estimates for the prevalence of dual sensory loss (vision and hearing) among older adults are either based on self‐reported measures or aggregated for older age groups. Current and detailed estimates based on objective measures are needed for public health, clinical, and policy decision‐making. Methods: We estimated the prevalence of dual sensory loss (DSL) using National Health Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 11 data (2021). We restricted to community‐dwelling adults aged ≥71 years with complete sensory testing data (N = 2579). Hearing loss was defined by a 4‐frequency (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) pure tone average for the better‐hearing ear (>25 decibel hearing level). Vision loss was defined by the presence of distance, near (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution >0.30), or contrast sensitivity loss (log contrast sensitivity <1.55). Participants were categorized into three groups: no sensory loss, single sensory loss (vision or hearing loss), and DSL (hearing and vision). Sensory loss prevalence was estimated by age group and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: In weighted analyses, among older Medicare beneficiaries (53% female, 7% Black, 6% Hispanic), 28% had no sensory loss and 22% had DSL. Prevalence of DSL increased with age. Most adults aged ≥90 years experienced DSL (59%), as opposed to single (39%) or no sensory loss (2%). DSL prevalence was greater among older adults with low education attainment (34%) and household income (43%). A higher proportion of older adults with a college education (17%), or from wealthier households (16%), had no sensory loss. Conclusions: One in 5 community‐dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥71 years have DSL, increasing to 3 in 5 for those aged ≥90 years. Prevalence is higher among older adults with low education attainment and from low‐income households, characteristics associated with low treatment. Policies increasing access and affordability of vision and hearing care could benefit millions of older Americans experiencing sensory loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]