Search

Background: Endometriosis is a benign disorder that is generally defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside their normal location. TGF- β 1 is found in stromal cells and its expression is increased in epithelial cells of endometriotic cysts. Endometriosis diagnostics take a long time, so new markers are needed to diagnose endometriosis. This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of TGF- β 1 in menstrual blood in diagnosing endometriosis., Method: Diagnostic tests to compare eutopic endometrial TGF- β 1 levels from menstrual blood of patients with suspected endometriosis were undertaken in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, from July 2019 to November 2020. 50 patients who were suspected with endometriosis met the inclusion criteria. Comparison of TGF- β 1 levels between endometriosis and nonendometriosis patients was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. The cutoff point of the TGF- β 1 level towards the histopathological outcome was obtained using the ROC curve. Data analysis was performed by using SPSS version 22.0., Results: In this study, endometriosis patients were 31.6 ± 6.55 years of age with a range of 20 to 46 years. In statistical analysis, there was no difference in BMI ( p = 0.181) and BMI classification ( p = 0.207), the history of contraception ( p = 0.097), infertility ( p = 1.000), and dysmenorrhoea ( p = 1.000) between endometriosis and nonendometriosis patients. In the study, there were differences in TGF- β 1 between endometriosis and nonendometriosis patients ( p ≤ 0.001). By using the ROC curve, the cutoff point for TGF- β 1 levels has the best sensitivity and specificity, which is 515 ng/ml. The TGF- β 1 level has a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.969, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.529, a positive likelihood ratio of 8, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.222, and an accuracy of 0.820 to the endometriosis outcome., Conclusion: It can be concluded that the TGF- β 1 level has a very good diagnostic value in establishing endometriosis diagnostics. This trial is registered with ISRCTN72218532., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Kemas Yusuf Effendi et al.)

Background: In Pakistan, there are a total of 160 neurosurgeons that constitute a ratio of one neurosurgeon for a 5.5 million population. Gilgit Baltistan being a backward region does not have a single tertiary care facility. A new department of neurosurgery was established at Regional Headquarter City Hospital (RHQ) Gilgit with only one neurosurgeon. This study aimed to determine which neurosurgical diagnoses are common and which surgical interventions were performed at RHQ., Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Regional Headquarter Hospital (RHQ) Gilgit in which data of patients operated for neurosurgical diseases between January 2020 and January 2022 was collected from patient record books., Results: Of the total of 223 patients, 148 (66.3%) were males and 75 (33.6%) were females. A total of 92(41.2%) belonged to the pediatric age group. The top most diagnosis included Neurotrauma (46.6%), NTDs (13.9%) and CSDH (10.3%) while the most routinely performed procedures were craniotomy & hematoma evacuation (22.9%), debridement & elevation of DSF (20.6%), and burrhole evacuation (13.9%). In the pediatric age group, the top diagnosis was Neurotrauma (43.5%), NTDs (32.6%), and Hydrocephalus (19.6%) while in adults, neurotrauma (48.9%) was the leading diagnosis followed by CSDH (17.6%). In the pediatric age group, repair of NTDs (32.6%) was the most frequently performed procedure., Conclusion: This study shows different kinds of neurosurgical cases but because of a lack of diagnostic and therapeutic facilities, very limited operations were performed and many cases were referred to metropolitan cities. The hospitals in the region need further up-gradation to cater to the presenting burden.

Background: Since the emergence of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) not only have social and the economical dimension of life been disturbed but it has also shattered educational activities as well. Due to fear of disease spread educational institutes are forced to implement online educational systems to teach their pupils. This study aims to explore the student's perceptions related to E-learning and their positive and negative outcome among medical students in Pakistan and Iran., Method: ology : This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted at Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran. This study involved 402 medical students of Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan (n = 202), and Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran (n = 200) who were actively involved in the online mode of education. A self-administered validated questionnaire was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis was used and analysis was done through SPSS V.23. A P-value of 0.05 was taken as significant., Results: A total of 402 students were enrolled, 202 from Pakistan and 200 from Iran. About 68.2% of the students were acquainted with moderate levels of IT skills. About 75.8% of the students were not showing any previous experience with E-learning. The most common advantage of E-learning was the ability to stay at home. The technical problem was the most common disadvantage in our study. Finally, face-to-face learning in terms of increasing knowledge, skill, and social competence was considered the best mode of learning both by Pakistani and Irani students. Country-wise effectiveness of face-to-face learning in terms of increasing knowledge is statistically significant (p-value = 0.019). Acceptance of E-learning is statistically associated with the country of learning (p-value = 0.020). E-learning was rated as enjoyable by 51.5% of the students., Conclusion: E-learning has its associated advantages and disadvantages as perceived by medical students but still face-to-face learning is considered the most effective form of learning as responded by medical students., Competing Interests: All authors declared no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors.)