Search

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders (PoNCDs), such as postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction or decline can occur after surgery, especially in older patients. This significantly affects patient morbidity and surgical outcomes. Among various risk factors, recent studies have shown that preoperative frailty is associated with developing these conditions. Although the mechanisms underlying PoNCDs remain unclear, neuroinflammation appears to play an important role in their development. For the prevention and treatment of PoNCDs, medication modification, a balanced diet, and prehabilitation and rehabilitation programs have been suggested. The risk of developing PoNCDs is thought to be lower in ambulatory patients. However, owing to technological advancements, an increasing number of older and sicker patients are undergoing more complex surgeries and are often not closely monitored after discharge. Therefore, equal attention should be paid to all patient populations. This article presents an overview of PoNCDs and highlights issues of particular interest for ambulatory surgery.

The article discusses the theme of "Crisis is Opportunity" in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing on examples from Singapore's response to past crises. It highlights lessons learned in interventional radiology (IR) from the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of infection control and adapting to a "phygital" future in healthcare. The text also calls for global cooperation in IR to address future challenges, reflecting on the need for preparedness and resilience in the face of crises. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and identify the main preoperative risk factors affecting the timely discharge of day surgery patients, offering evidence to enhance preoperative assessments and minimize delayed discharge. Background: With the widespread adoption of day surgery in global healthcare systems, ensuring timely discharge of patients post-surgery has become a critical challenge. Numerous studies have explored various preoperative risk factors influencing delayed discharge. This meta-analysis integrates existing evidence to clarify the primary preoperative risk factors. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases, including all clinical studies on preoperative risk factors for day surgery published until 15 October 2024. A systematic review and random effects model were employed to aggregate data and estimate the main preoperative risk factors for day surgery. Results: A total of nine studies involving 41,458 patients were included. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the following preoperative risk factors: age (MD = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.73–1.93, p < 0.0001), body mass index (BMI) (MD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.18–1.20, p = 0.008), the presence of chronic comorbidities (OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 2.93–4.46, p < 0.00001), the type of anesthesia (OR = 15.89, 95% CI: 7.07–35.69, p < 0.00001), a history of cardiac disease (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.71–3.53, p < 0.00001), gender (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.03–4.99, p < 0.00001), the expected duration of surgery (MD = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.15–0.20, p < 0.00001), complex procedures (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.47–2.16, p < 0.00001), a lack of social family support (OR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.60–3.67, p < 0.0001), and inadequate preoperative assessment (OR = 3.64, 95% CI: 2.06–6.41, p < 0.00001). There were no statistically significant differences between the delayed discharge group and the non-delayed discharge group in terms of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (p = 1.00) and preoperative anxiety (p = 0.08). Conclusion: This study identifies the primary preoperative risk factors for delayed discharge in day surgery, including age, high BMI, the presence of chronic comorbidities, the type of anesthesia, a history of cardiac disease, gender, the duration of surgery, the complexity of the procedure, a lack of social family support, and inadequate preoperative assessment. These findings provide a reference for preoperative assessment, highlighting the need for clinical attention to these high-risk groups during preoperative screening and management to reduce the likelihood of delayed discharge and enhance surgical safety and success rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique has revolutionized outpatient hand surgery, enabling procedures such as carpal tunnel release and trigger finger release without a tourniquet. Its benefits include patient cooperation during surgery, especially for tendon repairs. However, WALANT has limitations, including a steep learning curve, longer operative preparation time, and risks such as digital ischemia and adrenaline-induced cardiac ischemia. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of local anesthesia with a tourniquet for short-duration outpatient hand surgeries. Materials and Methods: This case series included 300 patients undergoing carpal tunnel or trigger finger release between February 2023 and March 2024. Local anesthesia with lidocaine was administered, and a tourniquet was applied to the proximal arm. Demographic data, operative time, and pain levels during tourniquet use (measured by VAS) were recorded. Results: The average surgical time was 12 min. Most procedures involved carpal tunnel release. The average VAS pain score was 3.73, with older patients and longer surgeries reporting higher discomfort. Tourniquet release was required in only 1% of cases due to discomfort. Conclusions: For short outpatient hand surgeries, local anesthesia with a tourniquet is a safe, effective alternative to WALANT, challenging its routine use and highlighting the need for tailored anesthetic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Center for Disease Control's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) reported increased Standardized Infection Ratios (SIRs) for hysterectomy at a large community hospital. Objective: To promote a surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle implemented to reduce hysterectomy-associated SSI. Methods: A multidisciplinary Workgroup implemented the Hysterectomy SSI Prevention Bundle in 2020 to enforce standardization of perioperative techniques. This study included all benign hysterectomies pre-implementation (n = 857) and post-implementation (n = 772). Per NHSN categorization guidelines, "abdominal hysterectomy" includes both open and laparoscopic routes. "Inpatient surgery" is date of discharge different from date of surgery; "outpatient surgery" is same date of discharge. "SSI" includes superficial, deep, and organ/space; "complex SSI" includes deep and organ/space. Patient demographics were categorized and evaluated for statistical significance. Results: After implementation of the SSI bundle, SIRs for hysterectomy were reduced to <1.0, indicating infection prevention. Reductions in SIR were significant for outpatient abdominal hysterectomy (0.868 [ p =.007]), inpatient vaginal hysterectomy (0 [ p <.001]), inpatient complex abdominal hysterectomy (0 [ p =.040]), and inpatient complex vaginal hysterectomy (0 [ p <.001]). Differences between groups were significant for increased laparoscopic and decreased vaginal hysterectomies (p <.001), increased outpatient surgeries (p <.001), and longer procedure duration (p <.001). Conclusion: Implementation of an SSI prevention bundle at a large community hospital has significantly reduced SIR for inpatient vaginal hysterectomies, outpatient abdominal hysterectomies, and all inpatient complex hysterectomies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paracetamol–codeine combination tablet is widely used in pain management after day surgery. For safety reasons, its use has decreased in recent years. Codeine is a prodrug metabolised in the liver by the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme to morphine that produces the analgesic effect of codeine. CYP2D6 is highly polymorphic, and based on genotypes, individuals can be divided into four categories: poor‐, intermediate‐, normal‐ and ultrarapid metabolisers. Differences in morphine and its metabolite concentrations have been described between different CYP2D6 genotypes following codeine administration. The aim of the study was to investigate the possible effect of CYP2D6 genotype on codeine efficacy and adverse effects in a large cohort of adult patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Methods: A total of 987 patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery were included in the analyses. Operation types or anaesthesia methods were not limited in the study protocol. All study patients received a fixed dose of paracetamol (1000 mg) and codeine (60 mg) orally for premedication. A blood sample was drawn to identify the genotype of CYP2D6. At home, the first‐line analgesic was paracetamol–codeine combination of 1–2 tablets at 1–3 times per day. Data on the efficacy and side effects of codeine were collected on the day of surgery and the following two postoperative days. Results: Of the studied patients, 37 (3.7%) were poor CYP2D6 metabolisers, 264 (27%) were intermediate, 623 (63%) were normal and 63 (6.4%) were ultrarapid metabolisers. Activity scores ranged from 0 to 4. CYP2D6 genotype was not associated in a statistically significant manner with postoperative pain, opioid consumption or the adverse effects of codeine, except for constipation at home. Poor CYP2D6 metabolisers reported significantly less severe constipation compared with normal metabolisers (p =.009, OR 0.40, 95% Cl 0.20–0.80). Conclusion: CYP2D6 genotype appears to be of minor importance for the analgesic efficacy of oral paracetamol‐codeine combination therapy after ambulatory surgery in adult patients undergoing similar types of surgery as in the present study but it may affect the risk of constipation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and patient satisfaction of outpatient partial parotidectomies in a French university hospital, addressing the lack of national data on such procedures amidst a push for increased ambulatory surgeries. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, involving patients undergoing partial parotidectomy for non-malignant tumors from March 2021 to May 2023. Inclusion was based on surgical, medical, and social criteria. A control group was also reviewed for comparison. The study followed a standardized surgical and anesthesia protocol, with patient satisfaction assessment. Results: From an initial pool of 104, 64 patients passed surgical screening, and 45 remained after anesthesia and social considerations, marking a 70% inclusion rate for outpatient care. The success rate of outpatient procedures stood at 98%, with complication incidences mirroring those of inpatient counterparts. 91% of participants expressed high satisfaction, scoring their experiences 7/10 or above. Conclusion: Outpatient partial parotidectomies within the French health infrastructure are both viable and align with patient expectations, reinforcing the shift towards ambulatory surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of same-day discharge (SDD) after Aquablation specifically in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). A prospective cohort of men with significant BPH underwent Aquablation at a single ASC. Comprehensive preoperative assessments were conducted, including uroflowmetry, IPSS, and PVR. Aquablation was performed as morning cases by a single experienced surgeon. Following the procedure, men were assessed for immediate postoperative outcomes, including pain levels, hematuria, and voiding efficiency. Patients meeting discharge criteria were allowed to return home on the same calendar day. A total of 60 consecutive men with a mean prostate size of 115 mL underwent Aquablation, 59 (98%) of whom were discharged the same day. No transfusions or return to the OR occurred. The procedure demonstrated a significant improvement in urinary flow rates and a substantial reduction in IPSS scores at the 1-month post-operative period. Pain scores were found to be minimal, and the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematuria and urinary retention was low and comparable to previously published outcomes. Despite more meticulous focal cautery, no differences in erectile, ejaculatory or adverse outcomes were observed. Aquablation for BPH at an ASC appears to be a safe and effective approach. Morning procedures and attentive cautery and streamlined patient pathways seem essential for SDD. Despite electrosurgical hemostasis, ejaculatory, sexual, and post-operatively pain were not compromised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: In the UK, approximately 70% of surgical procedures are undertaken as day‐cases. Little information exists about recovery from day‐case surgery, yet international data highlights patients are at risk of developing significant longer‐term health problems including chronic post‐surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use. The Patient‐reported Outcomes, Postoperative Pain and pain relief after daY case surgery (POPPY) study was a national prospective multicentre observational study, measuring short‐ and longer‐term patient‐reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day‐case surgery. Methods: This was a collaborative project led by resident anaesthetists under the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees umbrella. Adult day‐case surgical patients were recruited on the day of surgery. Baseline data including patient characteristics; procedure details; pre‐operative analgesic use; pre‐existing pain; and quality of life scores were recorded. Patients were followed up through automated short message service messages. Short‐term (postoperative days 1, 3 and 7) outcomes included: quality of recovery; pain severity; impact of pain on function; and analgesic use. Longer‐term outcomes (postoperative day 97) included: quality of life; analgesic use; incidence of chronic post‐surgical pain; and incidence persistent postoperative opioid use. Additional outcomes were completed by those patients with chronic post‐surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use, with 30 patients recruited to a qualitative semi‐structured interview study exploring postoperative expectations, recovery, postoperative pain and opioid use. Results: An embedded pilot study at four sites recruited 129 patients. Responses to the automated short message service were gained from 129 patients (100%) at day 1; 116 (89.9%) at day 3; 108 (83.7%) at day 7; and 77 (59.7%) at day 97 postoperatively. The pilot enabled refinement of the methods and processes before the national roll out. Conclusion: This paper outlines the methods for the POPPY study, the largest UK multicentre prospective observational study considering short‐ and longer‐term outcomes following day‐case surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A retrospective audit at Prince of Wales Hospital and Sydney Children's Hospital evaluated the impact of implementing a preoperative team huddle in theatre settings. The study found that the team huddle led to increased frequency of full multidisciplinary attendance, improving awareness, communication, and efficiency among staff. While there was a slight decrease in staff attitudes towards safety and teamwork, the team huddle was well-received and positively impacted theatre operations. The report, authored by a diverse group of individuals, emphasizes the importance of effective communication and teamwork in enhancing perioperative care. [Extracted from the article]

Background The involvement of older adults in research on digital health is uneven with respect to, for example, age, gender, health status, and digital skills. However, little is known regarding the effect of the uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap, identifies the effects of uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes, and also develops a correction for this. Methods Data are retrieved from a digital health intervention for postoperative monitoring of people who underwent day surgery in Sweden. Based on field information on the recruitment process and researched outcomes for the intervention, this study (i) tested intervention effects by using 2 standard unweighted procedures in a sample of 281 individuals aged 50 years or older, and then (ii) used the information on participants, nonparticipants, and their respective probabilities to be involved in the intervention study to perform a weighting of the intervention effects for each step of selection and for the study group membership. Results The intervention effects were found to be overestimated due to overrepresentation of groups that gained from receiving the intervention. No intervention effects were found after adjustment for participation bias. Conclusions Selective participation of older adults in digital health research biases research outcomes and can lead to overestimation of intervention effects. Weighting allows researchers to correct and describe the effect of selective participation on researched outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Usability of home use medical devices is complex, multidimensional and multifactorial. The design of such devices must accommodate a range of users, including patients, caregivers, and hospital staff, as well as the potential impact of human-human interaction through the device. In this study, we analyse the impact of the hospital context on the usability of a medical device used for post-ambulatory monitoring. We enrolled 28 patients and 20 student physicians in an ambulatory surgery system simulation. After the simulation, we conducted both focus groups and interviews to gather both quantitative and qualitative data to measure the usability of the medical device. The results show that exchanges during the consultation with the anaesthetist have a definite impact on the device's usability by modifying the user's perceived risk. Even if the device is intuitive to use, its usability is dependent on the context of use and the projection of the users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Geriatric patients compose a growing proportion of the dermatologic surgical population. Dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons should be cognizant of the unique physiologic considerations that accompany this group to deliver highly effective care. The purpose of this article is to discuss the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations geriatric patients present with to provide goal-concordant care. Preoperative considerations include medication optimization and anxiolysis. Intraoperative considerations such as fall risk assessment and prevention, sundowning, familial support, and pharmacologic interactions will be discussed. Lastly, effective methods for optimizing postoperative wound care, home care, and follow-up are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Longer life expectancy and increasing keratinocyte carcinoma incidence contribute to an increase in geriatric patients presenting for dermatologic surgery. Unique considerations accompany geriatric patients including goals of care, physiologic changes in medication metabolism, cognitive decline, and frailty. Limited geriatric training in dermatology residency has created a knowledge gap and dermatologic surgeons should be familiar with challenges facing older patients to provide interventions more congruent with goals and avoid overtreatment. Frailty assessments including the Geriatric 8 and Karnofsky Performance Scale are efficient tools to identify patients who are at risk for poor outcomes and complications. When frail patients are identified, goals of care discussions can be aided using structured palliative care frameworks including the 4Ms (what m atters, m edications, m entation, and m obility), REMAP (r eframing, e xpecting emotion, m apping patient goals, a ligning patient goals, and p roposing a plan), and Serious Illness Conversation Guide. Most geriatric patients will tolerate standard of care treatments including invasive modalities like Mohs surgery and excision. However, for frail patients, nonstandard treatments including topicals, energy-based devices, and intralesional chemotherapy may be appropriate options to limit patient morbidity while offering reasonable disease control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if day case cleft lip surgery has an impact on complications and 30-day readmission rate. Design: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Databases included; PubMed, Science Direct, Ovid and Cochrane. Search terms; "Day Case", "Day Care", "outpatient", "Ambulatory" AND "Cleft", "Cleft Lip". Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. Setting: Eligible study types included; randomised controlled trials, observational studies (prospective and retrospective) and case series. Patients/Participants: Paediatric patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair. Interventions: Day case surgery versus inpatient admission post-operative. Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcome measure: Primary cleft lip repair performed as a day case in paediatric patients. Secondary outcome measures: 1. Complication rates and 30-day re-admission to hospital rate. 2. Patient suitability for day case surgery. Results: Ten papers with 13 804 patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair were included, 28% were discharged on the day of surgery (Range 17%-81%). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the inpatient and day case cohorts. There was a significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates in the day case cohort. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates there is no difference in complication rates for patients discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted overnight. Complications encountered were infrequent, non-life threatening and often occurred more than 24 h following discharge. There was an observed reduction in 30-day readmission rates for day-case patients. This is likely to represent a variation in baseline characteristics which deemed them suitable for day case surgery pre-operatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current research indicates therapeutic benefits associated with facility dog interventions for hospitalized pediatric patients; however, considerably less is known about understanding, structuring, and optimizing these specialized services. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the roles, responsibilities, and experiences of pediatric hospital-based facility dog teams and programs. Participants included 43 facility dog handlers employed in US pediatric healthcare settings. A survey collected information about handler and program characteristics, perceptions of the facility dog role, and intervention provision experiences. Most programs were found in freestanding children’s hospitals, serving inpatient units, ambulatory surgery, the emergency department, and radiology. They described facility dogs as highly trained, facility-specific animals that work in tandem with trained psychosocial support professionals to identify and meet patient- and family-focused goals. Participants reported a spectrum of psychosocial interventions, describing their work as primarily animal-assisted therapy, with some animal-assisted intervention and animal-assisted activities as well. Facility dogs, alongside their handlers, offer an array of interventions grounded in their assessment of a child and family’s psychosocial and developmental needs and goals. Though programs may differ in some ways, they are united in their aims to provide intentional, playful, and healing interventions for hospitalized children and families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative that is indicated for induction and maintenance during general anaesthesia. Remimazolam is also used for sedation in outpatient surgery; however, most reports have focused on nonelderly patients, whereas only a few studies have reported the use of remimazolam for elderly patients when receiving regional nerve block anaesthesia. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remimazolam in elderly patients when specifically related to regional nerve block anaesthesia. Methods: This study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 80 patients aged 65 years or older under regional nerve block anaesthesia. After the effects of anaesthesia were determined, patients were intravenously administered different doses of the test drug, i.e. 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, or 6 mg, which were named the R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the loss of consciousness time. The secondary outcomes included the maintenance time and the number of assisted ventilators needed. The exceptional response of patients in terms of loss of consciousness maintenance time, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), SpO2, and modified observers assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S) scores were recorded at baseline (T0), 3 min after the injection of the test drug (T1), 6 min after the injection of the test drug (T2), 9 min after the injection of the test drug (T3), 12 min after the injection of the test drug (T4), 15 min after the injection of the test drug (T5), 18 min after the injection of the test drug (T6), 21 min after the injection of the test drug (T7), and 24 min after the injection of the test drug (T8). Results: We included 80 patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 16 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in sex, age, and BMI amongst the 5 groups. The loss of consciousness time was significantly greater in the R2 group than in the R3, R4, and R5 groups (p < 0.001), and the loss of consciousness maintenance time was significantly greater in the R5 group than in the R3 group (p < 0.05). The MAP was significantly lower in the R2 and R5 groups than in the R1 group at T4 (p = 0.004) and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T5 (p = 0.007). The HR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R3 group at T3 (p = 0.004) and T4 (p = 0.007). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R4 group at T4 (p = 0.049) and significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T5 (p = 0.024) and T6 (p = 0.020). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1, R3 and R4 groups at T7 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R1 group than in the R2 and R5 groups at T8 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T8 (p = 0.001). SpO2 was significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.003) and significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 and R5 groups at T4 (p = 0.002), T5 (p = 0.001), T6 (p = 0.000), and T7 (p = 0.000). The MOAA/S scores were significantly lower in the R4 and R5 groups than in the R1 and R2 groups at T1 (p = 0.000), significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 and R3 groups at T2 (p = 0.004), and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.036). Conclusion: The results indicated that doses of 5–5.5 mg remimazolam are more suitable for sedation in elderly patients, and the loss of consciousness time and depth of sedation differed according to the remimazolam dosage. Doses of 5–5.5 mg remimazolam were associated with adequate levels of sedation in elderly patients and with a decreased risk of complications, whilst haemodynamic fluctuations occurred approximately 12–15 min after the administration of remimazolam. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the potential benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for day case hysterectomies, drawing parallels with the principles of marginal gains used by elite athletes. It highlights the importance of preoperative patient education, minimal access approaches, and early mobilization for improved outcomes. The authors emphasize the need for multidisciplinary collaboration, patient selection, and ERAS principles to facilitate rapid recovery and discharge. The text also addresses challenges in implementing day case hysterectomies and suggests strategies for successful adoption of ERAS programs. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: To compare the outcomes and complications of two perioperative protocols for the management of patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): 24 h (1‐day surgery [OS]) versus 72 h (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) of the length of hospital stay (LOS). In our hypothesis, the reduction of the LOS from 3 to 1 day did not influence the outcomes and complications. Methods: A total of 42 patients (21 in each group) with isolated anteromedial knee osteoarthritis and meeting specific criteria were prospectively included in the study. Clinical outcomes included Knee Society Score (KSS) and Forgotten joint score while pain evaluation was performed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes were assessed measuring the knee range of motion (ROM) while radiographic outcomes were evaluated measuring the amelioration of the varus deformity through the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA). Results: Clinical and functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups. Complications occurred in 9.5% of OS and 4.7% of ERAS group patients. Significant improvements in knee ROM, VAS pain, KSS and HKA angle were observed postsurgery, with no significant differences between groups except in KSS expectations and function trends. Conclusion: The OS protocol is safe and effective and LOS, in a well‐defined fast‐track protocol, did not significantly impact clinical and functional outcomes. OS may lead to reduced hospitalisation costs and potential reductions in complications associated with prolonged stays, benefiting both patients and healthcare facilities. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow‐up periods is needed to confirm these findings. Early mobilisation and rehabilitation protocols are key components of successful patient recovery following UKA procedures. Level of Evidence: Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The practice of day care surgery is less embraced in many low‐middle‐income countries (LMIC), and even less for some procedures considered major such as thyroidectomy. Here we examine the safety of day care thyroidectomy at Kyabirwa Surgical Center, a stand‐alone day care surgery center in rural Eastern Uganda. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between 2019 and 2023. All patients who had day care thyroidectomy were included. Demographics, diagnosis, investigation findings, pathology reports, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative follow‐up data up to 30 days were also collected. Data were analyzed using R version 4.3.2. Results: A total of 51 patients underwent same‐day thyroidectomy, with an average age of 44.9 ± 12.1 years and 98% female. Procedures included total thyroidectomy (5, 9.8%), subtotal thyroidectomy (26, 51.0%), and lobectomy (20, 39.2%). Average size of the glands was 7.9 ± 2.21 cm. The majority 46 (90.2%) were of benign pathology. All patients were discharged by the evening of the same day. Complications encountered included hypocalcemia (1), hypertrophic scar (1), seroma (2), and transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (1). Overall complications rate was 9.8%. Gland size was statistically significant between patients with no complications (7.68 ± 2.06 cm) versus complications (9.90 ± 2.82, p < 0.05). Conclusion: With overall low complication rates, these findings suggest that thyroidectomy can safely be performed on a day care basis in a rural LMIC setting with suboptimal health care delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been a notable movement in performing procedures in the office setting. With this new shift, the utilization of proven safety measures would be beneficial to mirror. The utilization of a surgical safety checklist (SSC) has become an essential part of safety measures instituted to mitigate preventable errors in the operating room (OR). This measure is equally important to institute for non-OR procedures. The purpose of this project was to implement a SSC protocol as a standard of care at a clinic that newly adopted in-office surgical procedures with anesthesia. The project focused on developing and disseminating a SSC educational program for the procedural staff that included: three surgeons, three medical assistants, and one anesthesia provider. The staff were assessed on their ability to successfully implement the SSC over a 3-month period with a goal of 90% compliance. The result of the project was that the staff exceeded the compliance goal by successfully completing the SSC on 28 of the 29 procedures performed with anesthesia, meeting a 96% compliance. Overall, the implementation was embraced and effectively incorporated into the workflow. Comments received revealed that three staff have now adopted using the SSC beyond the project and utilize it for all procedures and injections they perform, making this implementation successful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the growing need for health services, proper bed capacity management is mandatory to avoid patient rejection or cancellation of a procedure. Hence, the day of surgery admission (DOSA) protocol is gaining popularity with safety concerns. We conducted this study in a 120-bed hospital. Our unit has four operating lists per week for elective cases. All patients who planned for elective surgery, with no medical illness or who had a controlled medical illness, were recruited. Every patient was seen in the surgical clinic with his plan of management written in his admission paper. Patients were admitted from 07:00 to 11:00 am through the special admission counter. We evaluated hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality. The total number of patients was 18,500 in a 13-year duration. The total number of case cancellations was 396 patients (2.1%). The general surgical procedures were 6987 (38%), the GIT procedures were 5469 (30%), the endocrine and breast procedures were 3545 (18%), the pediatric surgery procedures were 1431(8%), while urology procedures were 1068 (6%). The hospital stay was 1 day or less in 10,305 (56%) patients. The total number of patients who developed postoperative complications was 491 (2.6%). The mortality rate was 0.05% (10 patients). DOSA is a valid and safe protocol for selected patients. It minimizes hospital stays, reducing expenses. Adoption of DOSA will increase bed availability and avoid case cancellation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Amid substantial surgical wait lists, novel methods are needed to improve the delivery of surgical care in Canada. One strategy involves shifting select surgeries from hospitals into community ambulatory centers, which expedite procedures and allow hospitals to prioritize critical and complex patients. We sought to evaluate surgical outcomes at a novel, Canadian urologic clinic and surgical center. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a novel, accredited surgical facility and outpatient ambulatory clinic from August 2022 to August 2023. Procedures ranged from scrotal and transurethral surgeries to inflatable penile prosthesis insertion. Traditional outpatient procedures, including vasectomy and cystoscopy, were excluded. All patients were discharged the same day and seen 4–6 weeks post-procedure. Variables of interest included surgery type, anesthesia administered, additional clinic appointments, unplanned family physician appointments, visits to the emergency department (ED), and hospital admissions. RESULTS: In a 12-month period, 519 surgeries were performed. The mean patient age was 49.6±17.3 years, with most classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1–2 (88.8%). Most (95.8%, n=497) patients did not require medical care outside the clinic before their scheduled followup; 2.5% (n=13) visited the ED presenting for wound concerns, postoperative pain, query infection, or catheter-related concerns. Only 1.7% (n=9) required an unscheduled appointment with their family physician, with concerns being inadequate postoperative pain management (n=4) or suspected infection (n=4). No patient required hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Many urologic surgeries classically performed in hospital operating rooms can be safely performed in a non-hospital, outpatient surgical facility with preservation of good outcomes. This strategy can potentially improve the efficiency of urologic healthcare delivery in select patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to describe trends in inpatient and outpatient upper extremity fracture surgery between 2008 and 2021, along with identifying patient factors (age, sex, race, socioeconomic status) associated with outpatient surgery. Methods: Retrospectively, 12,593 adult patients who underwent upper extremity fracture repair from 2008 to 2021 at one of five urban hospitals in the Northeastern USA were identified. Using Distressed Communities Index (DCI), patients were divided into five quintiles based on their level of socioeconomic distress. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on patients from 2008 to 2019 to identify independent factors associated with outpatient management. Results: From 2008 to 2019, outpatient procedures saw an average increase of 31%. The largest increases in the outpatient management were seen in humerus (132%) and forearm fractures (127%). Carpal and hand surgeries had the lowest percent increase of 8.1%. Clavicle and wrist fractures were independently associated with outpatient management. Older age, male sex, higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, DCI scores in the 4th or 5th quintile, and fractures of the scapula, humerus, elbow, and forearm were associated with inpatient management. During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in outpatient procedures. Conclusion: There is a shift toward outpatient surgical management of upper extremity fractures from 2008 to 2021. Application of our findings can serve as an institutional guide to allocate patients to appropriate surgical settings. Moreover, physicians and institutions should be aware of the potential socioeconomic disparities and implement plans to allow for equal access to care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hip and knee arthroplasties are daily procedures in orthopaedic departments. Recently, same-day discharge (SDD) became increasingly popular, but doubts remain about its safety and generalization. Our hypothesis is that outpatient arthroplasty, in a high volume centre and with an institutional protocol, is an effective and reliable practice. Methods: We realized a monocentric retrospective study of patients undergoing outpatient partial (UKA) or total (TKA) knee or hip arthroplasty (THA) in a high volume academic centre using a well-defined institutional pathway. Epidemiological data and complications occurring in the month following surgery were studied. Results: 498 patients undergoing 501 arthroplasties (219 hips and 282 knees) were examined. The percentage of men and women was 60.28% and 39.72% respectively, mean age was 64.56 ± 9.59 years, mean BMI was 26.87 ± 4.2 and the most represented ASA score was 2. The success rate for same-day discharge was 97.21%. The most frequent causes of failure were urinary retention (28.6%), orthostatic hypotension (28.6%) and insufficiently controlled pain (14.3%). The readmission rate in the month following the operation was 0.8% and the rate of emergency department visits was 1.6%. Finally, the rate of early consultation visits was 7.98%. The comparison between success and failure subgroups in the outpatient setting of our cohort did not highlight statistically significant differences for studied parameters. Conclusion: Outpatient arthroplasty, performed in a center used to managing such operations and with a well-established institutional pre- and post-operative protocol, is a safe practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While laparoscopic cholecystectomy has largely been performed in an outpatient setting in some countries for years, in Germany it is still generally performed on an inpatient basis; however, with the progressive ambitions for more outpatient treatment within the German healthcare system, laparoscopic cholecystectomy will (have to) increasingly be performed on an outpatient basis in the upcoming years. Aim of the work: Presentation of the current framework conditions and the potential for outpatient performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany. Presentation and discussion on the current state of knowledge regarding patient selection, treatment pathways and safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: The potential for outpatient management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany is high. Based on the current literature, there are no safety concerns regarding outpatient performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients. Conclusion: Outpatient management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is inevitably heading our way in the next years. The key to successful change will be comprehensive patient information, patient selection and structured outpatient treatment pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outpatient surgery in the treatment of hernia is currently a major challenge for patients and treating physicians in Germany due to the new legal regulations (key term hybrid diagnosis-related groups, DRG). Despite large economic challenges and empty funds, the principle of medical treatment is still the patient-oriented scientifically founded medicine. Although outpatient treatment would be very desirable, clear medical knowledge should the basis for the justification of surgical strategies: outpatient short hospitalization (24h) or fully inpatient hospitalization (>24h). A completely outpatient treatment of hernias is not meaningful and the demarcation of outpatient, short inpatient and inpatient treatment should be demonstrated in a risk-adjusted manner. A classification is essential, particularly against the background of an intersectoral hybrid DRG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serum magnesium levels exceeding 0.9 mmol/L are associated with increased survival rates in patients with CKD. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for cardio-cerebrovascular events among patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and to examine their correlations with serum magnesium levels. Sociodemographic data, clinical physiological and biochemical indexes, and cardio-cerebrovascular event data were collected from 189 patients undergoing CAPD. Risk factors associated with cardio-cerebrovascular events were identified by univariate binary logistic regression analysis. Correlations between the risk factors and serum magnesium levels were determined by correlation analysis. Univariate regression analysis identified age, C-reactive protein (CRP), red cell volume distribution width standard deviation, red cell volume distribution width corpuscular volume, serum albumin, serum potassium, serum sodium, serum chlorine, serum magnesium, and serum uric acid as risk factors for cardio-cerebrovascular events. Among them, serum magnesium ≤0.8 mmol/L had the highest odds ratio (3.996). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that serum magnesium was an independent risk factor, while serum UA (<440 μmol/L) was an independent protective factor for cardio-cerebrovascular events. The incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular events differed significantly among patients with different grades of serum magnesium (χ2 = 12.023, p = 0.002), with the highest incidence observed in patients with a serum magnesium concentration <0.8 mmol/L. High serum magnesium levels were correlated with high levels of serum albumin (r = 0.399, p < 0.001), serum potassium (r = 0.423, p < 0.001), and serum uric acid (r = 0.411, p < 0.001), and low levels of CRP (r = −0.279, p < 0.001). In conclusion, low serum magnesium may predict cardio-cerebrovascular events in patients receiving CAPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pediatric surgery is associated with high levels of anxiety for both children and parents/caregivers. To mitigate anxiety, auricular acupuncture has shown its potential in the perioperative setting. Accordingly, our team developed a wearable prototype auricular laser acupuncture system, AcuHealth V1.0, as a portable acupuncture device and conducted a proof‐of‐concept evaluation with parents of children undergoing surgery. Aims: The primary aim of this study was to conduct feasibility testing of the AcuHealth V1.0 system in delivering auricular laser acupuncture. Methods: Parents of children who were scheduled to undergo outpatient surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups: authentic acupuncture (laser beams at known anxiolytic acupoints, n = 13), sham acupuncture (non‐anxiolytic acupoints, n = 14), or a placebo control group (inactive laser, n = 14). Parent self‐reported anxiety (0–10 numerical rating scale) was assessed at baseline, pre‐intervention (once child was taken to the OR), post‐intervention, and at 30 min after the intervention. Usability and acceptability data regarding the device were assessed after the intervention. Results: Baseline data revealed no significant difference in anxiety between the three groups. Parent‐reported anxiety level at 30‐min post‐intervention as compared to baseline in the authentic group was significantly decreased (delta mean ± std = −3.58 ± 2.07) compared to both the sham acupuncture (−1.35 ± 2.65) and placebo control group (0.54 ± 1.13). Evaluation of changes in parent‐reported anxiety between groups over time using two‐way repeated‐measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.001). Post hoc analysis with Scheffe test pairwise comparisons showed that at 30‐min post‐intervention compared to baseline, the authentic intervention group was significantly less anxious compared with both the sham group (p = 0.033) and the placebo control group (p = 0.001). Additionally, feedback regarding the usage of the device supported the acceptability and usability of the device with no adverse events. Conclusions: This pilot study administering laser auricular acupuncture via the AcuHealth V1.0 system decreased parental anxiety after 30 min in parents who received treatment immediately after their children were taken to the operating room with no adverse effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children undergoing outpatient surgery are at risk of inadequate postoperative pain control. Methadone has a long duration of action and an intraoperative dose may provide stable analgesia throughout the postoperative period. Intraoperative methadone has been shown to improve pain control in adolescents but its use for postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing outpatient surgery has not been studied before. Therefore, we conducted a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled trial to investigate the effects of a single dose of intraoperative methadone in children aged less than 5 years undergoing orchiopexy for undescended testis. Methods: A total of 68 children were randomized to receive either methadone (0.1 mg/kg) or isotonic saline following induction of anesthesia. Exclusion criteria included preterm birth, previous scrotal surgery, and parents' inability to consent. Primary outcomes were opioid requirements (first primary outcome) and pain intensity in the post‐anesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included episodes of desaturation and time until readiness to discharge from the post‐anesthesia care unit, sleep on the first postoperative night, pain intensity, and opioid requirements at home until the evening on the first postoperative day. Follow‐up was 4 days. Results: Sixty children completed the study (age, mean ± SD, 26.2 ± 13.9 months), 29 children received methadone, and 31 children received placebo. Eighteen children required opioids in the post‐anesthesia care unit, five children in the methadone group (proportion = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07, 0.36) compared to thirteen patients in the placebo group (0.42, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.60) (mean difference = −0.24 and 95% CI: −0.03, −0.47) (p = 0.037). Five children in the methadone group (0.17, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.31) versus ten in the placebo group (0.32, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.49) had a face, legs, activity, cry, consolability score of ≥5 in the post‐anesthesia care unit (mean difference = −0.15, 95% CI: −0.36, 0.06) (p =.179). More children in the placebo group woke up due to pain the first night following surgery (seven children vs. one child). The methadone group had a longer stay in the post‐anesthesia care unit. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: A single dose of intraoperative methadone reduces short‐term postoperative opioid requirements in children after orchiopexy for nondescended testes but prolongs the duration of their stay in the post‐anesthesia care unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Disparities secondary to underinsurance present throughout the surgical care continuum. Community free clinics are uniquely capable to provide health care services to the medically underserved, but surgery often falls outside their scope of care. Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive community free clinic patients receiving free surgical services via referral to a partnering ambulatory surgery center between March 2016 and September 2021. Those with documented contact information were recruited 1-3 years post-procedure for long-term quality-of-life (LTQOL) outcomes assessment via modified Veterans RAND 12-item health survey. Results: Of 142 included patients, 95.7% identified as Hispanic/Latino and 75.6% were uninsured. Twelve patients had cancerous or precancerous lesions detected and/or removed through diagnostic or definitive procedures. 3.5% experienced postoperative complication including bacterial (n = 2) or fungal (n = 1) surgical site infection and wound dehiscence (n = 2). With a 48.9% response rate, no significant differences in sociodemographic or clinical characteristics were found between surveyed vs non-surveyed patients. Of surveyed patients, 59.7% and 52.2% reported pre-/post-operative improvement in physical health and emotional health, respectively. Discussion: Free diagnostic screening procedures provided timely diagnoses while free definitive surgeries safely and positively impacted long-term patient-reported physical health. Longitudinal, multidisciplinary follow-up and social support may be warranted to concurrently improve emotional and mental health in similarly underinsured populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine if the administration of standardized opioid disposal instructions with focused parental education improves proper disposal of leftover opioid medication among families of children undergoing ambulatory urologic surgery compared to routine postoperative instructions. A prospective, double-blinded, single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in children 6-18 years undergoing ambulatory urology procedures between October 2021 and April 2023. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) opioid disposal best practices worksheet plus nursing parental education or routine postoperative instructions alone. All patients were prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen and a per-protocol rescue opioid prescription. The primary outcome was rate of proper opioid disposal at 10-14 days post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included parents' postoperative pain measure (PPPM) scores, numerical pain scale (NPS) scores, and weight-based opioid utilization at 48 hours and 10-14 days. We randomized 104 participants (53 intervention, 51 control) with 97% (101/104) complete follow-up data at 10-14 days. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and analgesia use were similar between groups. We observed no significant difference in proper opioid disposal rates between arms (31% intervention vs 18% control; estimated difference in proportion 13% [95% CI, −4%-29%]; P =.1). There were no increased odds of proper disposal of leftover opioid medication at 10-14 days with the intervention compared to the control (OR 2.0 [95% CI 0.8-5.1]; P =.1). We observed no differences in PPPM scores, NPS scores, or opioid utilization at 48 hours or 10-14 days. Providing formal opioid disposal instructions with parental education did not improve proper disposal of leftover opioid medication nor did it alter post-discharge opioid utilization after pediatric urologic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Due to rapidly rising health care costs, leveraging outpatient surgery to reduce hospital inpatient burden is being explored. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with pooled analysis to determine its safety and feasibility. Methods: Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), CINAHL (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched on 8 April 2024 for articles mentioning the following search concepts: (1) ambulatory; (2) outpatient; and (3) ALIF surgery. Included studies had (1) patients undergoing outpatient ALIF; (2) an inpatient control group; (3) a sample size of =5 in each cohort; and (4) a population aged =18 years. Outcome data were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria, and Newcastle-Ottawa scores were assigned to included studies lacking a prospective, randomized design. Fixed and random effects models were used to establish ORs and mean difference with 95% CIs for each outcome. Results: Pooled analysis included results from 4 studies. A total of 2070 patients underwent outpatient ALIF and 12,554 underwent inpatient ALIF. The results showed that compared with inpatient ALIF, outpatient ALIF resulted in a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events (OR -0.89, 95% CI [-1.69, -0.09], I2 = 54.88%, P = 0.03), comparable readmission rates (OR 0.02, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.20], I2 = 0%, P = 0.816), and nearly statistically significant decrease in reoperation rates (OR -0.41, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.00], I2 = 0%, P = 0.05). Discussion: These meta-analyses suggest that outpatient ALIF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events without a significant difference in hospital readmission or reoperation rates. These results suggest that in carefully selected patients, outpatient ALIF is safe and feasible. This study is limited by pooled analysis of retrospective data. Clinical Relevance: This systematic review contributes to the assessment of the safety of outpatient ALIF spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The "3rd International Congress Cro Day Surgery" in Opatija, Croatia, centered on dental surgery topics, including conscious sedation and general anesthesia in children's behavior management. Discussions also covered outpatient surgery protocols and the impact of hospital system parameters on patient satisfaction. Case reports and studies presented at the event emphasized a multidisciplinary approach to dental care for diverse patient populations. The text specifically mentions the safe and effective use of inhalation sedation with nitric oxide to reduce anxiety in children during dental procedures, with approximately 40 sedations conducted at the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb since January 2024. [Extracted from the article]

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients routinely undergo same-day discharge in an ambulatory setting, while anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) cases have historically been performed in an inpatient hospital setting. For healthier patients, however, TSA has increasingly transitioned to same-day discharge. Understanding whether a true difference in comorbidity burden exists between these patient groups would inform the appropriateness of outpatient TSA in an ambulatory setting. A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing primary TSA and same-day, ambulatory RCR performed between September 2017 and May 2021 at a single institution by 3 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. Selected sociodemographic factors and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (30 variables) were used to summarize and compare comorbidity burden. Only patients >50 year old were included. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to compare the prevalence or severity for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. 1433 cases met inclusion criteria, including 146 (34%) primary inpatient TSAs and 287 (66%) ambulatory RCRs. There were few differences in comorbidity burden between TSA and RCR, with TSA having a significantly higher prevalence for only 4 Elixhauser comorbidities and RCR having a higher prevalence of 1 comorbidity, although none survive a Bonferroni correction. TSA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of uncomplicated (P =.04192) and complicated hypertension (P =.0336), chronic pulmonary disease (P =.0045), and cardiac arrhythmia (P =.0031). The prevalence of diabetes (P =.029758) was significantly higher among RCR patients. Additionally, age (P =.011) was significantly higher among TSA patients. Of the TSA cohort, there were 10 incidences (1%) of 90-day readmission whereas there were 14 incidences (5%) of 90-day readmissions after RCR. Overall, few differences in the prevalence of individual comorbidities (and sociodemographic parameters) existed between patients undergoing outpatient RCR and inpatient primary anatomic TSA. Comorbidities with larger differences can be either optimized preoperatively or managed chronically, and given these similarities, TSA may be similarly appropriate for ambulatory settings, particularly as efficiencies in operative time and improvements in regional anesthesia continue to evolve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Exploring the retrospective analysis of the association between pre-hospital e-education via QR code and the hospital stay for inguinal hernia patients undergoing general anesthesia. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to explore the association between pre-hospital e-education utilizing QR code and hospital stay in patients with inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia between August 2022 to June 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their engagement with the pre-hospital e-education: those who accessed the pre-hospital e-education (viewing group) and those who did not (non-viewing group). The t-tests or Mann–Whitney U-tests were utilized to compare the means of the two groups, while the chi-square test was used to assess the rates between the two groups. To further explore the relationship between pre-hospital e-education and hospital stay, as well as other related factors, correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were carried out. Results: There were significant differences in the patient's hospital stay, the time to first postoperative ambulation and dietary, anxiety, pain, and patient satisfaction. The analyses revealed statistically significant correlations between viewing pre-hospital e-education via QR code and hospital stay, the time to first postoperative ambulation and dietary, anxiety, pain, as well as patients' satisfaction (P< 0.05). This fully adjusted linear regression analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between viewing the pre-hospital e-education and hospital stay (β = − 4.06, 95% CI: − 6.43, − 1.70; P =0.002). Similarly, a negative correlation was observed between viewing the pre-hospital e-education and the time to first ambulation (β = − 0.71, 95% CI: − 1.25, − 0.17; P =0.015), as well as the time to first postoperative dietary (β = − 1.20, 95% CI: − 1.71, − 0.34; P =0.006) after controlling for relevant covariates. Conclusion: Effective pre-hospital e-education via online QR codes may reduce hospital stay and improve the patient experience in day surgery under general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ropivacaine, an amide local anaesthesia, often considered safer alternative to bupivacaine. Bupivacaine, a longer-acting agent that provides dense motor blockade, is known to carry a higher risk of re-entrant arrhythmias and cardiac depression with accidental intravascular injection. The shorter duration of action, coupled with profound sensory block and comparatively less side-effects, makes ropivacaine useful in tackling cases of day care surgery. Aim: To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for elective inguinal and perineal surgery under spinal anaesthesia in terms of time of sensory and motor block, time taken to reach peak T8 level sensory block, total duration of both sensory and motor block, time of first micturition, and any associated side-effects. Materials and Methods: The present randomised double-blind clinical study, was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. D. Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (tertiary healthcare centre), Pune, Maharashtra, India, from March 2023 to August 2023. Study involved 30 patients aged 18-60, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II. Patients were randomly assigned to group RH (receiving hyperbaric ropivacaine) or group BH (receiving hyperbaric bupivacaine). The study assessed for onset and duration of sensory block at T-8 dermatome. The study also assessed motor block onset and duration using modified Bromage scale, observing postoperative micturition, intraoperative haemodynamic changes and adverse effects. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 16.0, with a p-value of

While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs). This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization. Retrospective cross-sectional study. We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64. Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively. Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting. We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%–12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8–22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18–14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity. We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care. 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic introduced a new problem in postoperative outpatient care: If I set a follow-up appointment at the clinic, will I endanger my patient? This study presents a different way to identify problems in the postoperative setting after outpatient procedures in our field– the telephone interview. Methods: A study nurse conducted the telephone interview using a structured questionnaire within one week of minor outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. She asked about pain, swelling, numbness, and mouth opening limitations. Certain red flag answers (numbness, increasing pain, increasing swelling, pain keeping patient from sleeping, pain on swallowing) caused her to book an appointment for the patient in our clinic within the following 24 hours. Results: 52 Patients completed the telephone questionnaire. Of those 3 (5.7%) had red flag answers that resulted in an appointment at the hospital within 24 hours. 2 (3.8%) of them were due to numbness. 24 (46.2%) patients reported no pain. On the numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), the average reported pain was 2.24 (SE 0.30). Swelling was reported by 39 (75%) patients. 22 (42.3%) reported the swelling to be mild, 10 (19.2%) moderate, and 7 (13.5%) to be severe. 13 (25%) patients reported a limitation to mouth opening. None reported the interincisal distance to be smaller than one finger. Conclusion: A structured telephone questionnaire can be a useful tool to discern postoperative complications and initiate necessary treatment. At the same time, it minimizes overtreatment. It can be used as a standard tool in the ambulatory treatment. It can be delegated to a secretary or ambulatory nurse with a standardized questionnaire to optimize resource use for selected patients. Moreover, patients describe it as a service to be called at home and they avoid unnecessary travel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders (PoNCDs), such as postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction or decline can occur after surgery, especially in older patients. This significantly affects patient morbidity and surgical outcomes. Among various risk factors, recent studies have shown that preoperative frailty is associated with developing these conditions. Although the mechanisms underlying PoNCDs remain unclear, neuroinflammation appears to play an important role in their development. For the prevention and treatment of PoNCDs, medication modification, a balanced diet, and prehabilitation and rehabilitation programs have been suggested. The risk of developing PoNCDs is thought to be lower in ambulatory patients. However, owing to technological advancements, an increasing number of older and sicker patients are undergoing more complex surgeries and are often not closely monitored after discharge. Therefore, equal attention should be paid to all patient populations. This article presents an overview of PoNCDs and highlights issues of particular interest for ambulatory surgery.

Abstract Background A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). Methods SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. Discussion The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the postoperative short-term outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: A single-institution, prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and postoperative short-term effects. Results: Among the 611 patients, 305 were assigned to the ERAS group, and 306 were assigned to the routine group. The ERAS group achieved earlier oral feeding, earlier mobilization, a shorter duration of drainage (2.0 vs. 5.0 days, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 7.0 days, P<0.001). The biological impacts were confirmed to be significantly better for the ERAS group. Furthermore, the ERAS group also had a lower incidence of PPCs (11.5% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001) than did the routine group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following predictors of drainage tube removal on the 1st day after surgery without pneumonia during hospitalization: comorbidity (P=0.029), surgical procedure (P=0.001), and operation time (P=0.039). Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol led to a decreased incidence of PPCs, suggesting that the ERAS protocol has a better biological impact on patients undergoing VATS for lung resection. Multigradient individual ERAS protocols are recommended at different institutions according to the individual conditions of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009ZT9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002ZGN&ts=3&cx=ks7hrg , identifier NCT04451473. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Day surgery has developed rapidly in China in recent years, although it still faces a shortage of anesthesiologists to handle pre-anesthesia routine before surgery. We hypothesized that ChatGPT may assist anesthesia practitioners in preoperative assessment and answer questions on the concerns of patients. The aims of this study were to examine the ability of ChatGPT to assess preoperative risk and determine its accuracy in answering questions regarding knowledge and management of day surgery anesthesia. Methods: One-hundred fifty patient profiles were generated to simulate day surgery patient presentations that involved complications of varying acuity and severity. The ChatGPT group and the expert group were both required to evaluate the profiles of 150 simulated patients to determine their ASA-PS classification and whether day surgery was recommended. ChatGPT was then asked to answer 131 questions about day surgery anesthesia that represented the most common issues encountered in clinical practice. The performance of ChatGPT was assessed and graded independently by two experienced anesthesiologists. Results: A total of 150 patient profiles were included in the study (75 males [50.0%] and 75 females [50.0%]). There was no difference between the ChatGPT group and the expert group for the ASA-PS classification and assessment of anesthesia risk in the patient profiles (P > 0.05). Regarding recommendation for day surgery in patients with certain comorbidities (ASA ≥ II), the expert group was inclined to require further examination or treatment. In addition, the proportion of conclusions made by ChatGPT was smaller than that of the experts (i.e., ChatGPT n (%) vs. expert n (%): day surgery can be performed, 67 (47.9) vs. 31 (25.4); needs further treatment and evaluation, 56 (37.3) vs. 66 (44.0); and day surgery is not recommended, 18 (12.9) vs. 29 (9.3), P < 0.05). We showed that ChatGPT had extensive knowledge related to day surgery anesthesia (94.0% correct), with most of the points (70%) considered comprehensive. The performance of ChatGPT was also better in the domains of peri-anesthesia concerns, lifestyle, and emotional support. Conclusions: ChatGPT can assist anesthesia practitioners and surgeons by alerting them to the ASA-PS classification and assessing perioperative risk in day surgery patients. ChatGPT can also be trusted to answer questions and concerns related to pre-anesthesia and therefore has the potential to provide important assistance in clinical work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Aim Design Methods Results Conclusion Implications for the Profession/and or Patient Care Reporting Method Patient or Public Contribution The study aimed to examine factors associated with the perceived feeling of safety and postoperative recovery in patients who have undergone orthopaedic day surgery under regional anaesthesia.The design was quantitative, descriptive, and cross‐sectional. The study participants comprised a consecutive sample (n = 209) of patients who underwent orthopaedic day surgery under regional anaesthesia.A questionnaire was sent to the home addresses of the study population approximately 3 weeks postoperatively. The questionnaire included the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale (FSS), the Swedish version of the post‐discharge surgical recovery scale (S‐PSR), and questions concerning background variables. Multivariate regression models were used to examine the association of different variables with both feeling safe and postoperative recovery.The only factor associated with the feeling of safety was preoperative anxiety; higher levels of preoperative anxiety were associated with lower levels of perceived safety during surgery. The factors associated with postoperative recovery were the recovery process itself and the patient's feeling of safety. Higher levels of postoperative anxiety were associated with a lower level of postoperative recovery. Higher levels of perceived safety during surgery were associated with higher postoperative recovery.The perceived feeling of safety in the perioperative period could not be explained by factors such as age, gender, or level of education. Based on the results of this study, postoperative recovery was associated with the perceived feeling of safety in the perioperative period. Anxiety in the perioperative period was associated with patients' perceived feeling of safety and their postoperative recovery. Thus, this study's results emphasise the importance of ensuring that people undergoing surgery feel safe to promote their recovery. Based on previous research, the nurse–patient relationship seems to be an important part of making patients feel safe, which ultimately affects their recovery.This study examines the association between perceived feeling of safety in the perioperative period and patients' postoperative recovery after undergoing orthopaedic day surgery under regional anaesthesia. Previous research has shown that the nurse–patient relationship and patients' possibilities to participate in their care are important for them to feel safe. This study further emphasises the importance of fostering relationships in the perioperative period and making patients an active part in decision‐making, as it may positively impact their recovery. Creating a feeling of safety for the patient should be prioritised, as it benefits their perioperative experience and postoperative recovery.This research is reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.No patient or public contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is one of the most common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Some institutions routinely perform BPO surgeries in ambulatory setting, while others elect for overnight hospitalization. With the COVID-19 pandemic limiting resources and hospital space for elective surgery, we investigated the time trend of ambulatory BPO procedures performed around the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: We identified BPO surgeries from the California State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases between 2018 and 2020. Our primary outcome was the proportion of procedures performed in ambulatory settings with a length of stay of zero days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with ambulatory surgery around the COVID-19 outbreak. Spline regression with a knot at the pandemic outbreak was performed to compare time trends pre- and post-pandemic. Results: Among 37,148 patients who underwent BPO procedures, 30,067 (80.9%) were ambulatory. Before COVID-19, 80.1% BPO procedures were performed ambulatory, which increased to 83.4% after COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0.001). In multivariable model, BPO procedures performed after COVID-19 outbreak were 1.26 times more likely to be ambulatory (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14–1.40, p < 0.0001). Spline curve analysis indicated significantly different trend of change pre- and post-pandemic (p = 0.006). Conclusions: We observed a rising trend of BPO surgeries performed in ambulatory setting post-pandemic. It remains to be seen if the observed ambulatory transition remains as we continue to recover from the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Same-day mastectomy (SDM) protocols have been shown to be safe, and their use increased up to 4-fold compared with prepandemic rates. We sought to identify factors that predict overnight patient admission and evaluate the associated cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing mastectomy from March 2020 to April 2022 were analyzed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, perioperative factors, 30-day complication, fixed and variable cost, and contribution margin were compared between those who underwent SDM vs those who required overnight admission after mastectomy (OAM). RESULTS: Of a total of 183 patients with planned SDM, 104 (57%) had SDM and 79 (43%) had OAM. Both groups had similar demographic, tumor, and operative characteristics. Patients who required OAM were more likely to be preoperative opioid users (p = 0.002), have higher American Society of Anesthesiology class (p = 0.028), and more likely to have procedure start time (PST) after 12:00 pm (49% vs 33%, p = 0.033). The rates of 30-day unplanned postoperative events were similar between SDM and OAM. Preoperative opioid user (odds ratio [OR] 3.62, 95% CI 1.56 to 8.40), postanesthesia care unit length of stay greater than 1 hour (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.37), and PST after 12:00 pm (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.51) were independent predictors of OAM on multivariate analysis. Both fixed ($5,545 vs $4,909, p = 0.03) and variable costs ($6,426 vs $4,909, p = 0.03) were higher for OAM compared with SDM. Contribution margin was not significantly different between the 2 groups (-$431 SDM vs -$734 OAM, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid use, American Society of Anesthesiology class, longer postanesthesia care unit length of stay, and PST after noon predict a higher likelihood of admission after planned SDM. OAM translated to higher cost but not to decreased profit for the hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) significantly impairs quality of life and poses a substantial healthcare burden, affecting up to a quarter of patients undergoing surgery. Although acute pain is recognised as a predictor for CPSP development, the role of patient experience remains underexplored. This study examines the predictive value of patient experience alongside traditional risk factors for CPSP after orthopaedic surgery. An exploratory analysis was conducted on 294 patients from a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing continuous perineural analgesia and single-injection nerve block in ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries. Patient experience was assessed using the Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthésie Générale (EVAN-G) validated questionnaire. Factors associated with CPSP at 90 days after surgery were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses, incorporating patient-reported outcomes and classical variables. Out of 219 patients with complete data, 63 (29%) developed CPSP at day 90. Multivariate analysis revealed a poor pain experience, as assessed by the pain dimension of EVAN-G on postoperative day 2, as an independent predictor of CPSP (odds ratio 6.45, 95% confidence interval 1.65–25.26, P <0.01). Poor pain experience was associated with an augmented risk of CPSP. This study underscores the role of patient-reported outcomes, specifically the pain experience dimension captured by the EVAN-G scale, in prediction of CPSP 90 days after surgery. It suggests a shift from conventional assessments of pain intensity to a comprehensive understanding of pain experience, advocating for tailored pain management approaches that could reduce chronic pain, thereby improving patient quality of life and functional recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effects of supraglottic airway tools such as classical laryngeal mask (cLMA) and I-gel, which can be used without the need for muscle relaxation in the airway management of general anesthesia patients, on the otolaryngeal system. Methods: This prospective randomised study was conducted at Karadeniz Technical University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey, during November 2020 to December 2021. Eighty-nine patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II group, who would undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two groups, namely Group cLMA and Group I-gel. cLMA and I-gel were used for airway management of the patients. After anesthesia induction, tympanometric measurements were taken at regular intervals for middle ear pressures of both ears. Results: While air way pressures, SpO2 and EtCO2 values were within normal limits, there were no differences in terms of complications. In tympanometric measurements, middle ear pressure increase was statistically higher in the cLMA group than in the I-gel group (p <0.001). Conclusions: We think that I-gel may be a more advantageous supra glottic airway device in terms of otolaryngeal effecs and middle ear pressure in theair way management during short surgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]