1. Performance Comparison of Four Hepatitis E Antibodies Detection Methods.
- Author
-
Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros, Díaz-Sánchez, Nazaret, Morago, Lucía, Rodríguez-Paredes, Vanessa, Barturen, Silvia, Rodríguez-Recio, Álvaro, García-Lugo, Maira Alejandra, Zamora, Maria Isabel, Mateo, María, Sánchez-Martínez, Mónica, and Avellón, Ana
- Subjects
HEPATITIS E virus ,HEPATITIS E ,IMMUNOGLOBULIN G ,MEDICAL screening ,SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) ,IMMUNOGLOBULIN M - Abstract
HEV antibody detection constitutes the main screening test for HEV infection. The aim of this study is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of four techniques: LIAISON
® MUREX DiaSorin anti-HEV IgG and anti-HEV IgM assays, Hepatitis E VIRCLIA® IgM and IgG monotests, WANTAI HEV-IgM and IgG ELISA and VIDAS® anti-HEV IgM and IgG tests in five panels of samples configurated according to the immunoblot (RecomLine, Mikrogen, Neuss, Germany). Anti-HEV IgM sensitivity in the acute phase was 100% in all techniques, while sensitivity, including the immediate convalescence phase, was 96.74% for LIAISON® , 83.14% for VIRCLIA® , 84.78% for WANTAI and 88.04% for VIDAS® . Anti-HEV IgM specificity was 100% for both LIAISON® and VIRCLIA® . Anti-HEV IgM WANTAI agreed with VIRCLIA® with a good Kappa coefficient (κ = 0.71). Anti-HEV IgG post-infection sensitivity was 100% for LIAISON® , VIDAS® and VIRCLIA® and 99% for WANTAI. Anti-HEV IgG specificity reached 97.17% for LIAISON and 88.68% for VIRCLIA® . Our results demonstrated a better capacity of LIAISON® MUREX anti-HEV IgM than that of competitors for detecting acute infections as well as accurate anti-HEV IgG results and in how to resolve them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF