Search

Abstract Background Adding anti-angiogenics to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer is recognized as a promising strategy, but its clinical value remains to be defined. Methods This single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial included patients with locally advanced (cT3/4aN+M0) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) who received three cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin (135 mg/m2 on day 1), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14), and oral apatinib for 21 days (250 mg once daily in the first two cycles, and further increased to 500 mg daily in the third cycle based on whether any adverse event of grade 3 or worse occurred), and an additional cycle of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response according to RECIST version 1.1. Results Between April 28, 2017, and October 23, 2019, 37 patients were screened and 35 participants were included. Of the 32 patients assessable for efficacy and safety, objective responses were achieved in 25 (78.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.0% to 90.7%) patients. Thirty-one (96.9%) patients received R0 resection, two (6.3%) patients achieved pathological complete response, and 11 (34.4%) patients achieved pathological response. At the data cutoff date (September 30, 2021), the median event-free survival was 42.6 (95% CI, 16.2 to not reached) months, and the median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (9/32, 28.1%), thrombocytopenia (7/32, 21.9%), and neutropenia (5/32, 15.6%). Seven (21.9%) patients developed surgical complications, and the most common one was intra-abdominal abscess (4/32, 12.5%). Conclusions The concomitant use of apatinib, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or GEJ, and further phase 3 study is warranted. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov ( NCT03229096 ).

Anti-angiogenics, radiotherapy (especially stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT)/chemotherapy, and immunotherapy form a critical trimodal approach in modern cancer therapy. The normalization window, however short, is the beachhead for the strategic initiation of a decipherable disruption of cancer cells. This opening can be the opportunity for designing controlled stepwise cancer cell death (CCD) and immunological augmentation. The next step is to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) through chemotherapy/ radiotherapy concurrently with the facilitation of professional phagocytosis. Immunotherapy at this stage, when interstitial pressure decreases considerably, leads to the improved perfusion of oxygen with solutes and improved immune-friendly pH and is additionally expected to open up the tumor microenvironment (TME) for a “flood” of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Furthermore, there would be enhanced interaction in “hot” nodules and the incorporation of immune reaction in “cold” nodules. Simultaneously, the added adjuvant-assisted neoantigen–immune cell interaction will likely set in a virtuous cycle of CCD induction followed by tumor cell-specific antigenic reaction boosting CCD, in turn promoting the normalization of the vasculature, completing the loop. There should be a conscious concern to protect the extracellular matrix (ECM), which will nurture the long-term immunological cross-talk to discourage dormancy, which is as essential as obtaining a complete response in imaging. The caveat is that the available therapies should be appropriately ranked during the start of the treatment since the initial administration is the most opportune period. A fast-paced development in the nanomedicine field is likely to assist in all the steps enumerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer is a frequent and lethal neoplasm. The tumor often creates new vessels to grow and spread—a process called 'angiogenesis'. Therefore, drugs blocking angiogenesis are effective against this malignancy. On the other side, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash the immune system to fight against tumors, have limited efficacy in patients carrying instability of DNA regions called microsatellites. However, there is an interaction between angiogenic factors and the immune system. This gives a chance to combine anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve the efficacy of treating this malignancy. Angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer, plays a fundamental role in colorectal cancer (CRC). Anti-angiogenic drugs and chemotherapy represent a standard of care for treating metastatic disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the therapeutic algorithm of many solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs is limited to mCRC patients carrying microsatellite instability (MSI-H), which represent approximately 3–5% of mCRC. Emerging evidence suggests that anti-angiogenic drugs could exhibit immunomodulatory properties. Thus, there is a strong rationale for combining anti-angiogenics and ICIs to improve efficacy in the metastatic setting. Our review summarizes the pre-clinical and clinical evidence regarding the combination of anti-angiogenics and ICIs in mCRC to deepen the possible application in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gaetano Pezzicoli,1,2 Elisabetta Filoni,1,2 Angela Gernone,2 Laura Cosmai,3 Mimma Rizzo,4 Camillo Porta2,5 1Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Post-Graduate School of Specialization in Medical Oncology, University of Bari ‘A. Moro’, Bari, Italy; 2Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy; 3Onconephrology Outpatient Clinic, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, A.S.S.T. Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy; 4Division of Translational Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; 5Chair of Oncology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari ‘A. Moro’, Bari, ItalyCorrespondence: Camillo PortaDivision of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, 70124, ItalyTel +39-080-5594167Fax +39-080-5593477Email camillo.porta@gmail.com; camillo.porta@uniba.itAbstract: In the last decade, the inhibition of the mechanistic target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) has disappointed the clinician’s expectations. Many clinical trials highlighted the low efficacy and unmanageable safety profile of first-generation mTOR inhibitors (Rapalogs), thus limiting their use in the clinical practice only to those patients who already failed several therapy lines. In this review, we analyze the major resistance mechanisms that undermine the efficacy of this class of drugs. Moreover, we describe some of the possible strategies to overcome the mechanisms of resistance and their clinical experimentation, with particular focus on novel mTOR inhibitors and the combinations of mTOR inhibitors and other anti-cancer drugs.Keywords: everolimus, temsirolimus, Rapa-Link, anti-angiogenics, autophagy

Anti-angiogenics, radiotherapy (especially stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT)/chemotherapy, and immunotherapy form a critical trimodal approach in modern cancer therapy. The normalization window, however short, is the beachhead for the strategic initiation of a decipherable disruption of cancer cells. This opening can be the opportunity for designing controlled stepwise cancer cell death (CCD) and immunological augmentation. The next step is to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) through chemotherapy/radiotherapy concurrently with the facilitation of professional phagocytosis. Immunotherapy at this stage, when interstitial pressure decreases considerably, leads to the improved perfusion of oxygen with solutes and improved immune-friendly pH and is additionally expected to open up the tumor microenvironment (TME) for a “flood” of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Furthermore, there would be enhanced interaction in “hot” nodules and the incorporation of immune reaction in “cold” nodules. Simultaneously, the added adjuvant-assisted neoantigen–immune cell interaction will likely set in a virtuous cycle of CCD induction followed by tumor cell-specific antigenic reaction boosting CCD, in turn promoting the normalization of the vasculature, completing the loop. There should be a conscious concern to protect the extracellular matrix (ECM), which will nurture the long-term immunological cross-talk to discourage dormancy, which is as essential as obtaining a complete response in imaging. The caveat is that the available therapies should be appropriately ranked during the start of the treatment since the initial administration is the most opportune period. A fast-paced development in the nanomedicine field is likely to assist in all the steps enumerated.

Phase I/II translational trial evaluating the molecular determinants of pazopanib plus interferon alpha efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. The expression levels of TNF- a, endoglin and PDL1 correlated with response at eight weeks after treatment initiation. This suggests a crucial role of vascular remodelling and inflammatory-mediated immune cell infiltration for an optimal response to pazopanib plus interferon alpha combination. Introduction: The therapeutic repertoire available for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy, required for molecular biomarkers for response. Patients and Methods: This was a phase I to II trial on the combination of pazopanib with interferonalpha (INF-2A) as first-line treatment for advanced RCC. The primary endpoint was recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and efficacy in terms of objective response rate (ORR, RECIST 1.1 criteria). Secondary endpoints included safety and a translational study of molecular biomarkers in serum and exosomes from peripheral blood samples at three-time points: baseline, 8 weeks of treatment, and progression of the disease. Results: Between July 2011 and July 2017, 53 eligible patients were treated and followed up (I, n = 20; II, n = 33). Pazopanib 800 mg + INF-2A 3 MIUs showed a manageable safety profile; therefore, it was selected for dose expansion. Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 24 (72.7%) patients. The ORR was 27.2%. The 12-month OS rate was 83.6% (median not reached), and after 30.9 months of followup, 24 (72.7%) patients were still alive. CCL2, IL8, TNF- a, and PD-L1 were significantly overexpressed after treatment initiation, while TGF- ß1 and CCL5 were significantly decreased. TNF- a, endoglin, and PDL1 expression are correlated with the response after treatment initiation. Conclusion: The trial did not reach its pre-specified target ORR. However, OS was longer than expected with pazopanib monotherapy. Changes in the molecular profile suggest a crucial role of vascular remodeling and inflammatory-mediated immune cell infiltration in optimal response to pazopanib plus INF-2A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In VELOUR phase III trial, aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI has been shown to prolong overall survival versus FOLFIRI plus placebo in metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. However, VELOUR did not evaluate patient quality of life and, outcomes following treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I) were unknown. In this prospective study conducted in daily practice, mCRC patients treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI maintained their quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI was also associated with a high objective tumor response and retained its activity regardless of sex, RAS status, and prior targeted therapy, especially after EGFR-I. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI. Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after the failure of oxaliplatin-containing therapy. QoLiTrap prospectively evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and effectiveness of this regimen in daily clinical practice, according to RAS status, sex, and prior targeted therapy, especially epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) improved or reduced by <5% from baseline during the first 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One thousand two hundred and seventy-seven patients were treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI and 872 were evaluable for QoL. GHS improved or decreased by <5% in 40.3% of cases. The ORR was 20.8%, the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3–8.3), and the median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 13.1–18.1). After prior EGFR-I, the ORR was 23.7%, median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5–12.9), and median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 10.5–33.7). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data. Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI given in daily practice maintained QoL in mCRC patients, was associated with a high objective tumor response, and retained its activity regardless of sex, RAS status, and prior EGFR-I therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All living beings continue their life by receiving energy and by excreting waste products. In animals, the arteries are the pathways of these transfers to the cells. Angiogenesis, the formation of the arteries by the development of pre-existed parental blood vessels, is a phenomenon that occurs naturally during puberty due to certain physiological processes such as menstruation, wound healing, or the adaptation of athletes' bodies during exercise. Nonetheless, the same life-giving process also occurs frequently in some patients and, conversely, occurs slowly in some physiological problems, such as cancer and diabetes, so inhibiting angiogenesis has been considered to be one of the important strategies to fight these diseases. Accordingly, in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, the highly controlled process of angiogenesis is very important in tissue repairing. Excessive angiogenesis can promote tumor progression and lack of enough angiogensis can hinder tissue repair. Thereby, both excessive and deficient angiogenesis can be problematic, this review article introduces and describes the types of factors involved in controlling angiogenesis. Considering all of the existing strategies, we will try to lay out the latest knowledge that deals with stimulating/inhibiting the angiogenesis. At the end of the article, owing to the early-reviewed mechanical aspects that overshadow angiogenesis, the strategies of angiogenesis in tissue engineering will be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian, uterine, and cervical cancers have limited efficacious treatment options and poor outcomes. The development of agents that target DNA repair mechanisms, angiogenesis, immune checkpoints, and hormone receptor expression provides additional options for these patients. Many available targeted therapies have limited efficacy as single agents, so clinical trials investigating combination therapies as well as continued identification and validation of predictive biomarkers are critical. Many novel small molecule therapies, antibody drug conjugates, and therapeutic vaccines are also in development. This review will focus on recent evidence supporting the use of clinically available targeted therapies for gynecologic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer, plays a fundamental role in colorectal cancer (CRC). Anti-angiogenic drugs and chemotherapy represent a standard of care for treating metastatic disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the therapeutic algorithm of many solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs is limited to mCRC patients carrying microsatellite instability (MSI-H), which represent approximately 3–5% of mCRC. Emerging evidence suggests that anti-angiogenic drugs could exhibit immunomodulatory properties. Thus, there is a strong rationale for combining anti-angiogenics and ICIs to improve efficacy in the metastatic setting. Our review summarizes the pre-clinical and clinical evidence regarding the combination of anti-angiogenics and ICIs in mCRC to deepen the possible application in daily clinical practice.

Pathological angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer; accordingly, a number of anticancer FDA-approved drugs act by inhibiting angiogenesis via different mechanisms. However, the development process of the most potent anti-angiogenics has met various hurdles including redundancy, multiplicity, and development of compensatory mechanisms by which blood vessels are remodeled. Moreover, identification of broad-spectrum anti-angiogenesis targets is proved to be required to enhance the efficacy of the anti-angiogenesis drugs. In this perspective, a proper understanding of the structure activity relationship (SAR) of the recent anti-angiogenics is required. Various anti-angiogenic classes have been developed over the years; among them, the heterocyclic organic compounds come to the fore as the most promising, with several drugs approved by the FDA. In this review, we discuss the structure–activity relationship of some promising potent heterocyclic anti-angiogenic leads. For each lead, a molecular modelling was also carried out in order to correlate its SAR and specificity to the active site. Furthermore, an in silico pharmacokinetics study for some representative leads was presented. Summarizing, new insights for further improvement for each lead have been reviewed.

Angiogenesis, the process leading to the formation of new blood vessels, is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Extensive studies established that i) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key driver of sprouting angiogenesis, ii) VEGF is overexpressed in most solid cancers, and iii) inhibition of VEGF can suppress tumor growth in animal models. This has led to the development of pharmacological agents for anti-angiogenesis to disrupt the vascular supply and starve the tumor of nutrients and oxygen, primarily through the blockade of VEGF/VEGF receptor signaling. This effort has resulted in 11 anti-VEGF drugs approved for certain advanced cancers, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted therapies. However, inhibition of VEGF signaling is not effective in all cancers, and anti-angiogenics have often only limited impact on overall survival of cancer patients. This review focuses on the current status of FDA-approved anti-angiogenic antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors and summarizes the progress and future directions of VEGF-targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The formation of new blood vessels plays a crucial for the development and progression of pathophysiological changes associated with a variety of disorders, including carcinogenesis. Angiogenesis inhibitors (anti-angiogenics) are an important part of treatment for some types of cancer. Some natural products isolated from marine invertebrates have revealed antiangiogenic activities, which are diverse in structure and mechanisms of action. Many preclinical studies have generated new models for further modification and optimization of anti-angiogenic substances, and new information for mechanistic studies and new anti-cancer drug candidates for clinical practice. Moreover, in the last decade it has become apparent that galectins are important regulators of tumor angiogenesis, as well as microRNA. MicroRNAs have been validated to modulate endothelial cell migration or endothelial tube organization. In the present review we summarize the current knowledge regarding the role of marine-derived natural products, galectins and microRNAs in tumor angiogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A benefit of anti-angiogenic drugs is improved tumor immune tolerance. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment mediate tumor immune tolerance and anti-angiogenic drugs not only indirectly affect Tregs via dendritic cells (DCs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) but they can also act directly on Tregs causing immunosuppression. Specifically, these drugs may induce differentiation and chemotaxis and reduce the number and function of Tregs by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) on the cell surface. Recently, anti-angiogenic drugs have been documented to promote a new way of thinking about tumor immunotherapy: clinical application of Tregs and related immunosuppressive molecules may be promising targets for synergistic tumor immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 5th Biennial Metronomic and Anti-angiogenic Therapy Meeting was held on 6th - 8th May in the Indian city of Mumbai. The meeting brought together a wide range of clinicians and researchers interested in metronomic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenics, drug repurposing and combinations thereof. Clinical experiences, including many from India, were reported and discussed in three symposia covering breast cancer, head and neck cancers and paediatrics. On the pre-clinical side research into putative mechanisms of action, and the interactions between low dose metronomic chemotherapy and angiogenesis and immune responses, were discussed in a number of presentations. Drug repurposing was discussed both in terms of clinical results, particularly with respect to angiosarcoma and high-risk neuroblastoma, and in pre-clinical settings, particularly the potential for peri-operative interventions. However, it was clear that there remain a number of key areas of challenge, particularly in terms of definitions, perceptions in the wider oncological community, mechanisms of action and predictive biomarkers. While the potential for metronomics and drug repurposing in low and middle income countries remains a key theme, it is clear that there is also considerable potential for clinically relevant improvements in patient outcomes even in high income economies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ultimate goal of using anti-angiogenics for treating cancer is inhibiting angiogenesis and therefore blocking metastatic dissemination. However, anti-angiogenic therapy is poorly effective in monotherapy. Indeed, VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) blockade might increase hypoxia in tumors and thus prevent its own delivery within the tumor mass. On the contrary, it has been observed that their association with chemotherapies potentiates the efficacy of the latter. This phenomenon has been explained by the normalization of the tumor vasculature. However, this mechanism is assumed to rely on the doses of antiangiogenics that are administered, low doses favoring vessel normalization. In a recent article published in the prestigious review Nature, a mechanism of regulation leading to the observed vessel normalization was proposed. In this model, the normalization of the blood vessels involves an increased activity of the pericytes in a process that is regulated by Type 1 CD4 T-helper immune cells. This process is tumorspecific since no changes in the vascular structures were observed in the normal tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Based on the success of sorafenib, several anti-angiogenic therapies are currently evaluated in advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. Few biological data are currently available from patients that may help understanding mechanisms of acquired resistance to these drugs. Herein, we report translational data from a post-treatment surgical specimen in a patient who experienced acquired resistance to sunitinib. Methods: Clinical, radiological, and pathological data were collected before treatment, under treatment, and at the time of tumor progression. In addition, a biomolecular analysis was performed at the time of progression. Results: In this patient with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, initial response to sunitinib was followed by tumor progression within 6months of treatment, requesting salvage surgical resection. Surprisingly, pathological examination on post-treatment specimens revealed the presence of two juxtaposed tissue components containing either sarcomatoid-like mesenchymal cells or well- to moderately-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer cells retain a high α-fetoprotein expression in both components. However, while cells from carcinoma expressed E-cadherin but no vimentin, cancer cells from the mesenchymal component highly expressed vimentin and lost E-cadherin protein expression as measured by immunostaining. HMGA2 and Ki67 mRNA were also expressed at higher levels in mesenchymal than in carcinoma cells. Conclusion: This case report suggests the occurrence of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in discrete areas of hepatocellular carcinomas developing resistance to sunitinib. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Most of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cannot benefit from surgical therapies. Among nonsurgical options, only radiofrequency can challenge surgery for small size tumours. Conformal radiotherapy is likely highly efficient on solitary tumours, but controlled studies are warranted to conclude. Other options are purely palliative. Transarterial hepatic chemoembolization is the goal-standard for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion, leading to modest but significant benefit on survival rates. Yttrium-90 radioembolization is under evaluation through controlled studies, and could be of major interest for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma with or without portal venous invasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Metronomic chemotherapy is optimized with tuned drug doses and drug-free breaks. • Innate immunity can be just as essential in antitumor efficacy as adaptive. • Conventional maximum tolerated dose administration can often be immunosuppressive. • Optimal drug scheduling may vary based on drug mechanism/target and cancer type. • Metronomic chemotherapy may be delivered with current biomaterials for clinical ease. Metronomic chemotherapy has been shown to elicit anti-tumor immune response and block tumor angiogenesis distinct from that observed with maximal tolerated dose (MTD) therapy. This review delves into the mechanisms behind anti-tumor immunity and seeks to identify the differential effect of dosing regimens, including daily low-dose and medium-dose intermittent chemotherapy (MEDIC), on both innate and adaptive immune populations involved in observed anti-tumor immune response. Given reports of VEGF/VEGFR blockade antagonizing anti-tumor immunity, drug choice, dose, and selective delivery determined by advanced formulations/vehicles are highlighted as potential sources of innovation for identifying anti-angiogenic modalities that may be combined with metronomic regimens without interrupting key immune players in the anti-tumor response. Engineered drug delivery mechanisms that exhibit extended and local release of anti-angiogenic agents both alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic treatments have also been demonstrated to elicit a potent and potentially systemic anti-tumor immune response, favoring tumor regression and stasis over progression. This review examines this interplay between various cancer models, the host immune response, and select anti-cancer agents depending on drug dosing, scheduling/regimen, and delivery modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the presented network is to establish a national coordination unit for the management of rare renal cancers in adult patients. This unit has emerged from two French regional multidisciplinary consultative meetings, one held in the Paris region and the other in the South of France, aimed at identifying, register and evaluate the treatments proposed to patients with rare renal cancers. Our primary objective is to write a referential, multidisciplinary document defining the modalities of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of affected patients. The constitution of a tumour and serum bank, as requested by the French National Cancer Institute (Inca) has been proposed to identify diagnostic and prognostic markers, which will help predicting the therapeutic response to anti-angiogenic treatments, currently under evaluation. Final objectives are to obtain epidemiologic, clinical and histological data that will allow evaluating all cases at a national scale, monitoring of the natural course of the disease, evaluating the efficacy of medical (anti-angiogenics, mTOR inhibitors...) and surgical innovative treatments and supporting medical publications on internationally homogenous series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pathological angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer; accordingly, a number of anticancer FDA-approved drugs act by inhibiting angiogenesis via different mechanisms. However, the development process of the most potent anti-angiogenics has met various hurdles including redundancy, multiplicity, and development of compensatory mechanisms by which blood vessels are remodeled. Moreover, identification of broad-spectrum anti-angiogenesis targets is proved to be required to enhance the efficacy of the anti-angiogenesis drugs. In this perspective, a proper understanding of the structure activity relationship (SAR) of the recent anti-angiogenics is required. Various anti-angiogenic classes have been developed over the years; among them, the heterocyclic organic compounds come to the fore as the most promising, with several drugs approved by the FDA. In this review, we discuss the structure–activity relationship of some promising potent heterocyclic anti-angiogenic leads. For each lead, a molecular modelling was also carried out in order to correlate its SAR and specificity to the active site. Furthermore, an in silico pharmacokinetics study for some representative leads was presented. Summarizing, new insights for further improvement for each lead have been reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal, ubiquitous tumor, with an incidence of 1 new case/million people/year. In the 2020 WHO classification, risk stratification models were recommended as a better tool to determine prognosis in SFT, to the detriment of "typical" or "malignant" classic terms. The risk for metastasis is up to 35-45%, or even greater, in series with a longer follow-up. Over the last few decades, advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics identified STAT6 nuclear protein expression and the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene as more precise tools for SFT diagnosis. Recent evidence taken from retrospective series and from two prospective phase II clinical trials showed that antiangiogenics are active and their sequential use from first line should be considered, except for dedifferentiated SFT for which chemotherapy is the best option. Since the fusion transcript driver's first description in 2013, new insights have been brought on key molecular events in SFT. This comprehensive review mainly focuses on the superior efficacy of antiangiogenics over chemotherapeutic agents in SFT, provides the current knowledge of key molecules that could co-drive the SFT behavior, and suggests new target candidates that deserve to be explored in preclinical and clinical research in SFT.

Ovarian tumor is the gynecological cancer associated with the highest mortality. Most diseases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which impairs the chances of prolonged complete remission. The standard front-line treatment of advanced stages combines surgery in an expert center with platinum-based chemotherapy. Most patients experience a relapse in the years following the initial treatment. During the last decade, anti-angiogenic agents used in the maintenance setting improved progression free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone. More recently, PARP inhibitors demonstrated substantial efficacy, mainly in patients with germinal or somatic BRCA mutations or other homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD), all involved in double strand DNA Damage Repair (DDR). Other therapeutic paradigms are currently being explored, including combinations of immune-checkpoints inhibitors, chemotherapy, bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors. In addition to these clinical advances, molecular characterization of the tumors and their correlations with drugs efficacy are needed to better understand which patient will benefit the most from the various treatments available to date. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal anti-angiogenic strategy as second-line treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) based first-line treatment is still debated. Methods: This multicenter, real-world, retrospective study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of second-line Bevacizumab- and Aflibercept-based treatments after an anti-EGFR based first-line regimen. Clinical outcomes measured were: objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) profiles. Results: From February 2011 to October 2019, 277 consecutive mCRC patients received Bevacizumab-based (228, 82.3%) or Aflibercept-based (49, 17.7%) regimen. No significant difference was found regarding ORR. The median follow-up was 27.7 months (95%CI: 24.7–34.4). Aflibercept-treated group had a significantly shorter PFS compared to Bevacizumab-treated group (5.6 vs. 7.1 months, respectively) (HR = 1.34 (95%CI: 0.95–1.89); p = 0.0932). The median OS of the Bevacizumab-treated group and Aflibercept-treated group was 16.2 (95%CI: 15.3–18.1) and 12.7 (95%CI: 8.8–17.5) months, respectively (HR= 1.31 (95%CI: 0.89–1.93) p = 0.16). After adjusting for the key covariates (age, gender, performance status, number of metastatic sites and primary tumor side) Bevacizumab-based regimens revealed to be significantly related with a prolonged PFS (HR = 1.44 (95%CI: 1.02–2.03); p = 0.0399) compared to Aflibercept-based regimens, but not with a prolonged OS (HR = 1.47 (95%CI: 0.99–2.17); p = 0.0503). The incidence of G3/G4 VEGF inhibitors class-specific AEs was 7.5% and 26.5% in the Bevacizumab-treated group and the Aflibercept-treated group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Our analysis seems to reveal that Bevacizumab-based regimens have a slightly better PFS and class-specific AEs profile compared to Aflibercept-based regimen as second-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC patients previously treated with anti-EGFR based treatments. These results have to be taken with caution and no conclusive considerations are allowed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tear is a well-known complication of retinal pigment epithelial detachments (PED) and may cause a significant visual impairment. The most common cause is a vascularized PED in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The development of diagnostic imaging techniques brings us closer to the etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms of this entity, offering us new strategies for treatment and follow-up. The advent of intravitreal antiangiogenic treatment (anti-VEGF) has led to an increase in the number of reported cases of RPE tears, which are an important vision-limiting factor during treatment. However, RPE tears may occur spontaneously or as a consequence of thermal laser treatment, photodynamic therapy or anti-VEGF therapy. It is accepted that the mechanism of RPE tears is multifactorial. The optimization of the functional outcome of this complication has been described with continuous treatment with antiangiogenic drugs. The goal of the present review is to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and treatment of RPE tears., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

The previous guidelines from the Cancer Committee of the Association Française d'Urologie were published in 2013. We wanted this new version to be simple, clear and straightforward. All significant recent publications on kidney cancer have been included. The main changes compared to 2013 are the following: © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved., (© 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (anti-VEGFR-TKIs) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation., Patients and Methods: The files of all patients with m-ccRCC consecutively treated with first-line anti-VEGFR-TKIs at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology slides from nephrectomy and metastasectomy were assessed for the presence and extent of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation., Results: A total of 124 patients were included; nephrectomy and metastasectomy specimens were available in 117 and 35 patients, respectively. Thirty percent of the primary nephrectomy specimens had sarcomatoid features, and the median involvement of the sarcomatoid component was 21% (range, 1%-95%). Patients with an important sarcomatoid component, defined as ≥ 25% involvement of the tumor, had a very poor outcome: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3 and 6 months, respectively, and no partial responses (PR) were observed. Patients without sarcomatoid dedifferentiation or with sarcomatoid involvement < 25% had a PFS of 12 months (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 51; 95% CI, 12.58-207.3), an OS of 22 months (P < .0001, HR, 10.72; 95% CI, 3.56-32.25), and a PR rate of 50% (P = .0015). Patients with a sarcomatoid component ≥ 25% in the metastasectomy also had a poorer PFS and OS on anti-VEGFR-TKIs compared with patients with < 25% of sarcomatoid features at these sites., Conclusion: Patients with m-ccRCC whose tumors contain a component of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation of ≥ 25% of the total tumor volume have a very poor outcome when treated with anti-VEGFR-TKIs. Analysis of the extent of sarcomatoid features in resected metastases can provide additional prognostic information., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)