Search

OBJECTIVE: Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is a high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-associated enzyme, that has been implicated as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate how different biologic therapies affect levels of PON1 and oxylipins. METHODS: 1213 adult patients with RA in the Comparative Effectiveness Registry to study Therapies for Arthritis and Inflammatory CoNditions cohort study with moderate-to-high disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10) who initiated a new biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), n=296; abatacept, n=374; tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, n=427; rituximab, n=116) were followed prospectively with serum specimens analysed for PON1 activity by arylesterase (ARYL), lactonase (LAC) and PON assays at baseline and after 6 months of biologic therapy. A targeted panel of oxylipins was evaluated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry in a subset of patients with the lowest and highest 6-month Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) responses in each treatment group. RESULTS: PON1 activity generally increased in the entire cohort after 6 months of new biologic therapy, showing the greatest, most consistent increases in the TCZ group. Increases in all three PON1 domains associated with significant decreases in disease activity in DAS28-CRP/CDAI (p

OBJECTIVES: Chronic inflammation promotes cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) improve disease activity and cardiovascular disease outcomes. We explored whether bDMARDs influence the impact of disease activity and inflammatory markers on long-term cardiovascular risk in RA. METHODS: We studied 4370 participants without cardiovascular disease in a 10-country observational cohort of patients with RA. Endpoints were (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) encompassing myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death; and (2) any ischaemic cardiovascular events (iCVE) including MACE plus revascularisation, angina, transient ischaemic attack and peripheral arterial disease. RESULTS: Over 26 534 patient-years, 239 MACE and 362 iCVE occurred. The interaction between 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and bDMARD use was significant for MACE (p=0.017), suggesting the effect of DAS28-CRP on MACE risk differed among bDMARD users (n=515) and non-users (n=3855). DAS28-CRP (per unit increase) is associated with MACE risk in bDMARD non-users (HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.37)) but not users (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.20)). The interaction between CRP (per log unit increase) and bDMARD use was also significant for MACE (p=0.011). CRP associated with MACE risk in bDMARD non-users (HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.30)), but not users (HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.17)). No interaction was observed between bDMARD use and DAS28-CRP (p=0.167) or CRP (p=0.237) for iCVE risk. CONCLUSIONS: RA activity and inflammatory markers associated with risk of MACE in bDMARD non-users but not users suggesting the possibility of biological-specific benefits locally on arterial wall independently of effects on systemic inflammation.

ObjectiveAccurate identification of lupus nephritis (LN) cases is essential for patient management, research and public health initiatives. However, LN diagnosis codes in electronic health records (EHRs) are underused, hindering efficient identification. We investigated the current performance of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, 9th and 10th editions (ICD9/10), for identifying prevalent LN, and developed scoring systems to increase identification of LN that are adaptable to settings with and without LN ICD codes.MethodsTraining and test sets derived from EHR data from a large health system. An external set comprised data from the EHR of a second large health system. Adults with ICD9/10 codes for SLE were included. LN cases were ascertained through manual chart reviews conducted by rheumatologists. Two definitions of LN were used: strict (definite LN) and inclusive (definite, potential or diagnostic uncertainty). Gradient boosting models including structured EHR fields were used for predictor selection. Two logistic regression-based scoring systems were developed ('LN-Code' included LN ICD codes and 'LN-No Code' did not), calibrated and validated using standard performance metrics.ResultsA total of 4152 patients from University of California San Francisco Medical Center and 370 patients from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center met the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 50 years, 87% were female. LN diagnosis codes demonstrated low sensitivity (43-73%) but high specificity (92-97%). LN-Code achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 and a sensitivity of 0.88 for identifying LN using the inclusive definition. LN-No Code reached an AUC of 0.91 and a sensitivity of 0.95 (0.97 for the strict definition). Both scoring systems had good external validity, calibration and performance across racial and ethnic groups.ConclusionsThis study quantified the underutilisation of LN diagnosis codes in EHRs and introduced two adaptable scoring systems to enhance LN identification. Further validation in diverse healthcare settings is essential to ensure their broader applicability.

BackgroundThere is little robust data about the cardiovascular safety of hydroxychloroquine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who often have cardiovascular comorbidities. We examined the association between use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with RA and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).MethodsIn a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with RA, we identified patients who initiated HCQ (users) and who did not initiate HCQ (non-users) between January 2015-June 2017. Each HCQ user was matched to 2 non-users of HCQ using propensity score derived from patient baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACE, defined as acute admissions for stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite of MACE and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare outcomes between HCQ users to non-users.ResultsThe study included 2380 RA patients with incident HCQ use and matched 4633 HCQ non-users over the study period. The mean follow-up duration was 1.67 and 1.63 years in HCQ non-users and users, respectively. In multivariable models, use of HCQ was not associated with the risk of MACE (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI: 0.832-1.33). However, use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45-0.64) and the composite of all-cause mortality and MACE (HR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58-0.78).ConclusionHCQ use was independently associated with a lower risk of mortality in older adults with RA but not with incidence of MACE events. Key Points • Using an incident user design (to avoid the biases of a prevalent user design) and a population-based approach, we examined the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in older patients with RA. • We did not find an association between HCQ use and incident MACE. We did, however, find a significant association with the composite outcome (MACE and all-cause mortality) driven by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with HCQ use.

This exploratory study aimed to examine the impact of abatacept treatment on bone structure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). RA patients initiating either abatacept or newly introduced csDMARDs were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized, two-group study. Bone structure in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpal heads was assessed using HR-pQCT at 0, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. Synovitis was evaluated using musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI. The adjusted mean between-group differences (abatacept–csDMARDs group) were estimated using a mixed-effect model. Thirty-five patients (abatacept group: n = 15; csDMARDs group: n = 20) were analyzed. Changes in erosion volume, depth and width were numerically smaller in the abatacept group compared to the csDMARDs group (adjusted mean between-group differences: − 1.86 mm3, − 0.02 mm, and − 0.09 mm, respectively). Over a 12-month period, 5 erosions emerged in the csDMARDs group, while only 1 erosion appeared in the abatacept group. Compared to csDMARDs, abatacept better preserved bone microarchitecture; several components of bone microarchitecture were significantly worsened at 6 months in the csDMARDs group, but were not deteriorated at 6 months in the abatacept group. Changes in synovitis scores were similar between the two treatment groups. Our results indicate that abatacept prevented the progression of bone erosion including new occurrence, and also prevented worsening of bone strength independently with synovitis compared to csDMARDs including MTX. Thus, abatacept treatment may provide benefits not only in inhibiting the progress of bone erosion but also in preventing bone microarchitectural deterioration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osteoporosis is a common condition that increases the risk of fracture and mortality. In Taiwan, clinical guidelines recommend pharmaceutical therapy for patients with a T-score of ≤ − 2.5; however, Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) only covers these medications for those with a history of fragility fractures. This gap in coverage necessitates a discussion of out-of-pocket treatment options. To address this, we provided an integrated care program with patient education and shared decision-making by nurse case managers specializing in osteoporosis. We evaluated whether education by nurse case managers influences patients with a T-score ≤ − 2.5, who are not covered by the NHI, to choose out-of-pocket pharmaceutical therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent bone density scanning at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021. We identified 4,462 patients with a T-score of ≤ − 2.5 who were ineligible for NHI-covered anti-osteoporotic therapy and analyzed trends in out-of-pocket medication use. Since the integrated care program began in 2018, we evaluated whether education by nurse case managers between 2018 and 2021 influenced patients' decisions to pay out-of-pocket for therapy. After the implementation of the integrated care program, we identified 2,910 patients with a T-score ≤ -2.5 who were ineligible for NHI-covered anti-osteoporotic therapy. Of these, 640 opted for out-of-pocket treatment, while 2,270 chose conservative care. After a 1:1 propensity score match based on age and sex, logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of nurse case manager education on these decisions. Results: Between 2014 and 2021, 888 of the 4,462 patients chose out-of-pocket pharmaceutical therapy. Before the implementation of the integrated care program and patient education by nurse case managers (2014–2017), 16% of the patients opted to pay out-of-pocket for anti-osteoporotic therapy. After the program was implemented (2018–2021), the rate increased significantly to 22% (P < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that a history of osteoarthritis (adjusted odds ratio = 1.576; P = 0.009) and education provided by the nurse case managers (adjusted odds ratio = 5.044; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with choosing out-of-pocket therapy. Conclusions: Education from nurse case managers significantly increased the likelihood of patients choosing out-of-pocket anti-osteoporotic therapy in our hospital, thereby bridging the gap between clinical guidelines and NHI reimbursement criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Green synthesized nanoparticles have recently gained significant medicinal applications and oftentimes outperform their green sources. Selenium is of fundamental importance to human health, stemming from its distinctive physicochemical properties, such as antioxidant activity, inhibition of Lipid peroxidation, stabilization of membrane proteins, maintenance of membrane fluidity and modulation of cell signaling. Though reports have shown some therapeutic potential of Ackee plant parts such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, very few scientific proofs still exist in support of these effects. Methods: This study synthesized selenium nanoparticles (Se-NPs) from crude methanolic extracts of Ackee leaves (AKL) and Ackee arils (AKA), examined the photo-physical characteristics of the Se-NPs and determined the in-vitro antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory potentials of AKL, AKA, and their Se-NPs using established protocols. Results: In both leaves and arils Se-NPs: UV spectroscopy revealed a qualitative absorbance at 310 nm; FTIR indicated multiple vibrations around 4000 cm−1- 400 cm−1; SEM images of 5 µm principally showed consistent size distribution of amorphous and granular shape at a magnification of 10,000X; while EDS spectra strongly confirm the presence of atomic Se compound at 30 kV. Various antioxidant activities assays carried out showed a range of approximately 4 to 60 times higher activities of the AKL, AKA, and Se-NPs than Ascorbic acid—the standard drug used. Furthermore, appreciable activities of more than 50% were obtained for alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activities, along with highly significant activities of haemoglobin glycosylation, glucose uptake, membrane stabilization, anti-arthritic, anti-haemolysis activities, when AKL, AKA, and Se-NPs were compared with standard drugs. Conclusion: Encouraging the development and utilization of AKL, AKA, and Se-NPs will provide tremendous therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability approaches towards the management of diabetes, inflammation, and other oxidative stress-related diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inflammation and angiogenesis are two main mechanisms that act as mutual pathways in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This work aimed to study the efficacy of digoxin as an adjunct therapy to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in active RA patients. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 60 adult patients with active RA received a placebo or digoxin (0.25 mg every other day) combined with csDMARDs for 6 months. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates and the disease activity score (DAS28) were assessed for patients. Flow cytometric analysis of Th17 cells and serum concentrations of IL-17A, IL-23, HIF-1α, and VEGF were evaluated before and after three and 6 months of therapy. Results: Following three and 6 months of digoxin therapy combined with csDMARDs, significant differences were detected in laboratory and clinical parameters relative to the control group. After 6 months, 83.3% of patients in the digoxin group, compared to 56.7% in the control group, achieved an ACR20 response (p = 0.024). The digoxin group had a significantly higher percentage of patients who achieved DAS28 remission after 6 months (p = 0.024). Notable improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, ACR50, and ACR70 were detected in the digoxin group. Conclusion: Digoxin was well tolerated and exerted profound immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects in RA patients, and may also exhibit anti-angiogenic properties, indicating that it might be an effective adjunct to csDMARDs in treating RA. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04834557. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory condition that primarily affects individuals aged 50 and older, especially in Western countries. Although glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of PMR treatment, these drugs are associated with side effects, making it advisable to use them for the shortest duration possible. However, tapering or discontinuation of glucocorticoids often leads to disease relapses. In this review, we focus on the traditional management of PMR, as well as the potential for therapies that may reduce glucocorticoid use. Special attention is given to the efficacy of biologic agents in PMR management. Methods: A literature review, primarily based on articles published in PubMed, was conducted. In addition to discussing various glucocorticoids and conventional disease-modifying drugs used for the management of isolated PMR, this review specifically focused on the information reported regarding new therapies, with particular emphasis on biologic agents. Results: Prednisone or prednisolone at a dose ranging between 12.5 and 25 mg/day is the agreed-upon treatment for PMR. Due to the side effects associated with prolonged glucocorticoid use and the high frequency of relapses when glucocorticoids are tapered, glucocorticoid-sparing agents have emerged as tools in the management of PMR. Methotrexate has traditionally been the conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) unanimously recommended for use in PMR. Other conventional DMARDs, such as leflunomide, have shown promising results but require further study. The use of biologic agents has marked a significant step forward in the management of PMR. While anti-TNF agents failed to provide beneficial effects in isolated PMR, anti-IL-6 receptor agents, such as tocilizumab and sarilumab, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing relapse frequency, lowering the cumulative glucocorticoid burden, and achieving long-term remission of the disease. Other biologic agents, many of which have been used in giant cell arteritis, as well as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, are currently under investigation. Conclusions: Glucocorticoids are the primary treatment for isolated PMR but are associated with comorbidities, especially in patients with pre-existing conditions or frequent relapses. Glucocorticoid-sparing agents, such as methotrexate and biologics, in particular tocilizumab and sarilumab, offer alternatives, improving symptoms and reducing glucocorticoid use. While biologic agents reduce long-term side effects and help achieve disease remission, their use must consider potential side effects and higher costs compared to traditional therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives RA patients have an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, including atrial fibrillation (AF), but the impact of RA on ischaemic stroke risk in the context of AF remains unknown. We explored whether the risk of ischaemic stroke after diagnosis of AF is further increased among patients with RA compared with non-RA patients. Methods In the nationwide Norwegian Cardio-Rheuma Register, we evaluated cumulative incidence and hazard rate of ischaemic stroke after the first AF diagnosis (2750 individuals with RA and 158 879 without RA between 2010 and 2017) by using a competing risk model with a 3-month delayed entry. Results The 5-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke was 7.3% (95% CI: 5.9–8.7%) for patients with RA and 5.0% (95% CI: 4.9–5.2%) for patients without RA. Unadjusted univariate analyses indicated that AF patients with RA had a HR of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.62) for ischaemic stroke compared with those without RA. Sex- and age-adjusted HR for ischaemic stroke in RA patients with AF was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.50), and the effect size remained unchanged after adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. RA patients were less likely to receive OAC treatment than non-RA patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.97). Conclusion RA patients diagnosed with AF are at a further increased risk for stroke compared with non-RA patients with AF, and less likely to receive OAC treatment, emphasizing the need to improve stroke prevention in AF patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Osteoarticular infection (OAI) is a feared complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to explore the risk of OAI and death following SAB in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify risk factors for OAI in patients with RA. Methods Danish nationwide cohort study of all patients with microbiologically verified first-time SAB between 2006–18. We identified RA, SAB, comorbidities, and RA-related characteristics (e.g. orthopaedic implants and antirheumatic treatment) in national registries including the rheumatology registry DANBIO. We estimated the cumulative incidence of OAI and death and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs, multivariate Cox regression). Results We identified 18 274 patients with SAB (n  = 367 with RA). The 90-day cumulative incidence of OAI was 23.1% (95% CI 18.8; 27.6) for patients with RA and 12.5% (12.1; 13.0) for patients without RA (non-RA) [HR 1.93 (1.54; 2.41)]. For RA patients with orthopaedic implants cumulative incidence was 29.4% (22.9; 36.2) [HR 1.75 (1.08; 2.85)], and for current users of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) it was 41.9% (27.0; 56.1) [HR 2.27 (1.29; 3.98) compared with non-users]. All-cause 90-day mortality following SAB was similar in RA [35.4% (30.6; 40.3)] and non-RA [33.9% (33.2; 34.5), HR 1.04 (0.87; 1.24)]. Conclusion Following SAB, almost one in four patients with RA contracted OAI corresponding to a doubled risk compared with non-RA. In RA, orthopaedic implants and current TNFi use were associated with approximately doubled OAI risk. One in three died within 90 days in both RA and non-RA. These findings encourage vigilance in RA patients with SAB to avoid treatment delay of OAI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To study the therapeutic variations of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) between genders and across age stages in axial SpA (axSpA) patients through meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials published by PubMed, Scopus and Embase before 10 August 2023, testing the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs in axSpA, were searched and systematically reviewed. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society ≥40% improvement (ASAS40) was used as the primary outcome of treatment response. Results Only one study meet the inclusion criteria related to tsDMARDs, which was excluded from further analysis. Nine studies of bDMARDs, with 4127 patients, were included for the final analysis. When compared with placebo, both males [odds ratio (OR) 3.14 (95% CI 2.66, 3.70)] and females [OR 2.32 (95% CI 1.82, 2.82)] and younger [OR 4.00 (95% CI 2.50, 6.40)] and older [OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.15, 4.22)] patients presented significantly better responses to bDMARDs. Also, the efficacies were more evident in males [OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.56, 2.30)] and younger [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.42, 3.02)] patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the gender difference in efficacy was more obvious in non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients (P heterogeneity = 0.03, I 2 = 78.1%). Moreover, males with radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) and nr-axSpA shared similar responses to bDMARDs (P heterogeneity = 0.87, I 2 = 0%), while females with r-axSpA showed greater response than those with nr-axSpA (P heterogeneity = 0.005, I 2 = 87.4%). Conclusions The bDMARDs were efficacious in all axSpA patients regardless of gender or age. However, the treatment responses were more evident in male and younger patients. Also, females with r-axSpA had greater responses than those with nr-axSpA, whereas no relevant difference was observed in males, indicating that the gender difference on efficacy was greater in nr-axSpA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and drug tolerability of biological DMARD (bDMARD) and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) monotherapy in patients with RA in a multicentre cohort study. Methods Patients with RA for whom bDMARD/JAKi monotherapy without conventional synthetic DMARDs has been initiated were included. Monotherapy regimens were categorized as IL-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig), JAKis, or TNF inhibitors (TNFis). Multiple propensity score–based inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce selection bias. Linear mixed-effect models with IPW were used to examine changes in the DAS in 28 joints using ESR (DAS28)-ESR at 24 weeks, and drug retention was compared between monotherapy groups using IPW Cox proportional hazards models. Results A total of 849 treatment courses were included, involving 635 patients (IL-6Ris, 218; CTLA4Ig, 183; JAKis, 92; TNFis, 356). The change in DAS28-ESR at week 24 as the primary outcome was –0.93 (95% CI: –1.20 to –0.66) lower in the IL-6Ri group than in the TNFi group, while those of the CTLA4Ig and JAKi groups were similar to that of the TNFi group [–0.20 (–0.48 to 0.08), –0.25 (–0.67 to 0.16), respectively]. IL-6Ri use was associated with significantly lower overall drug discontinuation than that for TNFi use [hazard ratio = 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P  = 0.001]. Similar retention rates were identified for the CTLA4Ig and JAKi groups to that of the TNFi group. Conclusion In the analysis with IPW to reduce selection bias, IL-6Ri monotherapy was superior to TNFi monotherapy in terms of effectiveness and drug retention. No significant differences were identified between CTLA4Ig, JAKi and TNFi monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This multicentre, retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, peficitinib and upadacitinib in real-world clinical settings after minimizing selection bias and adjusting the confounding patient characteristics. Method The 622 patients were selected from the ANSWER cohort database and treated with tofacitinib (TOF), baricitinib (BAR), peficitinib (PEF) or upadacitinib (UPA). The patient's background was matched using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) among four treatment groups. The values of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) after drug initiation and the remission or low disease activity (LDA) rates of CDAI at 6 months after drug initiation were compared among the four groups. Further, the predictive factor for TOF and BAR efficacy was analysed. Results The retention and discontinuation rates until 6 months after drug initiations were not significantly different among the four JAK inhibitors treatment groups. Mean CDAI value, CDAI remission rate, and CDAI-LDA rate at 6 months after drug initiation were not significantly different among treatment groups. Baseline CDAI (TOFA: OR 1.09, P   <  0.001; BARI: OR 1.07, P   <  0.001), baseline CRP (TOFA: OR 1.32, P   =  0.049), baseline glucocorticoid dose (BARI: OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.38, P   =  0.035), a number of previous biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs) (BARI: OR 1.36, P   =  0.004) were predictive factors for resistance to CDAI-LDA achievement to JAK inhibitor treatment. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of TOF, BAR, PEF and UPA were not significantly different for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Many guidelines recommend limiting glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but 40% of patients remain on glucocorticoids long term. We evaluated the cardiovascular risk of long‐term glucocorticoid prescription by studying patients on stable disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: Using two claims databases, we identified patients with RA on stable DMARD therapy for >180 days. Proportional hazards models with inverse‐probability weights and clustering to account for multiple observations were used to estimate the effect of glucocorticoid dose on composite cardiovascular outcomes (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI]). Results: There were 135,583 patients in Medicare and 39,272 in Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database. Medicare and CDM patients had an incidence of 1.3 and 0.8 composite cardiovascular outcomes per 100 person‐years, respectively. In the older, comorbid Medicare cohort, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose‐dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes in adjusted models with predicted one‐year incidence of 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%–1.6%) for ≤5 mg, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%–1.9%) for >5 to 10 mg, and 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%–2.5%) for >10 mg versus 1.1% (95% CI 1.1%–1.2%) among patients not receiving glucocorticoids. There was no significant association among the CDM cohort. However, in the subgroup of younger patients with RA and higher cardiovascular risk, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose‐dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusion: Among older patients with more comorbidities and younger patients with higher cardiovascular risk with RA on stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose‐dependent increased risk of MI and stroke, even at doses ≤5 mg/day. By contrast, no association was noted among younger, healthier patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a 5-year retrospective study on the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy. A total of 335 patients were treated with apremilast, with demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes recorded. Results showed significant reductions in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores over the study period, with a majority of patients achieving PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. The study concluded that apremilast demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability as a treatment option for patients with contraindications to biological treatments. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To characterize and describe clinical experience with childhood-onset non-infectious uveitis. Study Design: A multicenter retrospective multidisciplinary national web-based registry of 507 patients from 21 hospitals was analyzed. Cases were grouped as immune disease-associated (IMDu), idiopathic (IDIu) or ophthalmologically distinct. Characteristics of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated (non-HLA-B27-related) uveitis (JIAu), IDIu, and pars planitis (PP) were compared. Results: IMDu (62.3%) and JIAu (51.9%) predominated in young females; and IDIu (22.7%) and PP (13.6%) in older children, without sex imbalance. Ocular complications occurred in 45.3% of cases (posterior synechiae [28%], cataracts [16%], band keratopathy [14%], ocular hypertension [11%] and cystoid macular edema [10%]) and were associated with synthetic (86%) and biologic (65%) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use. Subgroups were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with different characteristics. JIAu was typically anterior (98%), insidious (75%), in ANA-positive (69%), young females (82%) with fewer complications (31%), better visual outcomes, and later use of uveitis-effective biologics. In contrast, IDIu was characteristically anterior (87%) or panuveitic (12.1%), with acute onset (60%) and more complications at onset (59%: synechiae [31%] and cataracts [9.6%]) and less DMARD use, while PP is intermediate, and was mostly bilateral (72.5%), persistent (86.5%) and chronic (86.8%), with more complications (70%; mainly posterior segment and cataracts at last visit), impaired visual acuity at onset, and greater systemic (81.2%), subtenon (29.1%) and intravitreal (10.1%) steroid use. Conclusion: Prognosis of childhood uveitis has improved in the "biologic era," particularly in JIAu. Early referral and DMARD therapy may reduce steroid use and improve outcomes, especially in PP and IDIu. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "Prevalence of high and low serum alkaline phosphatase levels and the associated factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the IORRA cohort study" published in Modern Rheumatology in 2024 discusses the prevalence of high and low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study found that 7.9% of patients had high ALP levels and 1.3% had low ALP levels. Factors associated with ALP levels included age, disease activity, serum AST levels, active vitamin D3 use, and antiresorptive agent use. The study highlights the importance of monitoring ALP levels in RA patients and the potential impact of medications on ALP levels. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effects of age on clinical characteristics and outcomes in biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD)-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: We analysed the cases of 234 Japanese b/tsDMARD-naïve RA patients who underwent b/tsDMARD treatment in a multicentre ultrasound prospective observational cohort. We compared the clinical characteristics at baseline and outcomes at 12 months between those aged ≥60 years and those <60 years. Results: Compared to the <60-year-old group (n = 78), the ≥60-year-old group (n = 156) had higher inflammatory marker values and ultrasound combined scores, especially wrist joints, at baseline. Age at baseline positively correlated significantly with the ultrasound scores at baseline; however, age was not a significant variable by the multiple regression analysis. The patients treated with different MOAs in the ≥60-year-old group had comparable outcomes and multiple regression analysis revealed that mechanism of action (MOA) was not a significant contributor to the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 12 months. Conclusions: RA patients with advanced age demonstrated distinctive clinical characteristics. The MOAs were not associated with clinical outcomes and ultrasound outcomes in RA patients with advanced age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this article is to update evidence on the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and provide information to the taskforce for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: We searched various databases for randomised controlled trials on RA published until June 2022, with no language restriction. For each of the 15 clinical questions, two independent reviewers screened the articles, evaluated the core outcomes, and performed meta-analyses. Results: Subcutaneous injection of methotrexate (MTX) showed similar efficacy to oral MTX in MTX-naïve RA patients. Ozoralizumab combined with MTX improved drug efficacy compared to the placebo in RA patients with inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Rituximab with and without concomitant csDMARDs showed similar efficacy to other biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in bDMARD-IR RA patients. Combined Janus kinase inhibitors and MTX achieved similar clinical responses and equal safety during a 4-year period compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in MTX-IR RA patients. Biosimilars showed efficacy equivalent to that of the original bDMARDs in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR RA patients. Conclusions: This systematic review provides latest evidence for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for RA management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) are often discontinued when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is diagnosed with cancer. Our aim was to determine trends in bDMARD utilization in patients with RA and recently diagnosed cancer. Method: We examined two national claims databases to identify adults with RA and recently diagnosed colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database 2008–2022, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Medicare-linked 2008–2017). We determined time trends in bDMARD and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) prescriptions during the first 3 years after cancer with Cochram-Armitage tests and multivariable logistic regression. Cancer cohorts were analyzed separately. Results: We included 3595 patients in all six cohorts (in Clinformatics® 503 with colorectal, 468 with lung, and 440 with prostate cancer; in SEER-Medicare 580 with colorectal, 1010 with lung, and 594 with prostate cancer). No significant increase was observed in bDMARD or TNFi utilization over time. Overall, use of bDMARD within the first 3 years of follow-up ranged from 16.7% (Clinformatics® lung cohort) to 29.7% (SEER-Medicare colorectal cohort). The major predictor of bDMARD utilization was prior use in the 3 months before cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all cancers) and earlier cancer stage (p < 0.001 in colorectal and lung cancer and p = 0.05 in prostate cancer). Conclusions: Use of bDMARD in patients with RA and recently diagnosed common cancers has not increased since 2008. Additional evidence on the safety of bDMARD in patients with early cancer is needed to ensure appropriate management of their RA. Key Points • Use of bDMARD and TNFi in patients with RA and early colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer has been stable since 2008, with no significant increases over time. • The major determinant of receiving bDMARD after cancer diagnosis was prior treatment with bDMARD in the prior 3 months before cancer. • Patients with advanced cancer stage and distant metastases were less likely to receive bDMARD and TNFi than those at early stages of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of JAK inhibitors in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) and non-D2TRA patients and evaluate the factors influencing their efficacy using real-world data. Method: Here, 159 JAK inhibitor-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis were categorized into D2TRA and non-D2TRA groups. Data including the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at initiation and 6 months after drug administration, drug retention months, and reason for discontinuation due to toxic adverse events were collected. Results: The retention rates at 6 months were 64.0% (D2TRA) and 78.4% (non-D2TRA) and were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.030). The discontinuation rate owing to toxic adverse events significantly differed between the two groups (p = 0.030). The CDAI-low disease activity (LDA) rates differed significantly between the two groups (non-D2TRA, 62.3%; D2TRA, 34%; p < 0.001). CDAI-LDA achievement at 6 months after drug introduction was significantly associated with the number of times that biologic and/or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were previously used and the CDAI at baseline in all patients treated with JAK inhibitors. However, no predictive factors were identified for D2TRA patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Conclusion: Compared to non-D2TRA patients, D2TRA patients demonstrated significantly lower drug retention rates, CDAI-LDA achievement rates, and safety of JAK inhibitors. No significant predictive factor for CDAI-LDA achievement 6 months after drug introduction was detected in D2TRA patients. Key Points • The retention of JAK inhibitors were significantly lower for the treatment of D2TRA patients in comparison with non-D2TRA patients. • The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors were significantly lower for the treatment of D2TRA patients. • Number of previous uses of b/tsDMARDs and CDAI at baseline were identified as the predictive factors for resistance to CDAI-LDA achievement to JAK inhibitor treatment. • No significant predictive factor for CDAI-LDA achievement 6 months after drug introduction was detected in D2TRA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Methods: We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i). Results: All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval. Conclusion: This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is an inflammatory breast disorder of unknown etiology. This benign condition can mimic the clinical presentation of breast cancer and is characterized by symptoms such as breast pain, erythema, and swelling. Over the past few years, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) have been increasingly used to manage this condition. However, strong evidence to support their use is lacking. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of DMARDs in the management of IGM. Methods: A systematic literature review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, directory of open access journals (DOAJ) and Cochrane Library from their inception until May 2024. We included retrospective and prospective studies while excluding case reports and case series of less than 10 patients. Results: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria. Fifteen studies were retrospective, while 2 were prospective. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Of these, 16 papers examined the effect of methotrexate on IGM, revealing significant disease improvement in most cases. Several of the studies indicated that patients treated with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil also achieved favorable responses. Conclusion: Given the rarity of IGM, only a limited number of studies have explored the use of DMARDs as a pharmacological treatment option. A significant barrier to advancing our understanding is the substantial heterogeneity in the quality and volume of data provided by these studies. Therefore, there is a need for well-designed, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to rigorously assess the efficacy of DMARDs in the treatment of IGM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To report pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, clinical effect, and safety of intravenous (IV) golimumab in children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) who participated in A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab in Pediatric Participants With Active Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy (GO-VIVA)'s open-label, long-term extension (LTE) through week 252. Methods. GO-VIVA participants who continued IV golimumab (80 mg/m² every 8 weeks) after week 52 were included. PK and safety were assessed through week 244 (last dose) and week 252, respectively, and clinical response through week 116. Clinical outcomes included JIA--American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10). Binary outcomes used nonresponder imputation, and other descriptive analyses used observed data. Results. Of 112/127 (88.2%) participants entering the LTE, 69 completed the week 252 visit. Median steady-state trough golimumab concentrations were generally maintained from week 52 through week 244 (range 0.3-0.6 μg/mL). Antigolimumab antibody rates were consistent through week 52 (39.2% [49/125]) and week 244 (44.8% [56/125]). Week 52 JIA-ACR 30/50/70/90 response rates (75.6% [96/127], 74% [94/127], 65.4% [83/127], and 48.8% [62/127], respectively) were generally maintained through week 116 (72.4% [92/127], 71.7% [91/127], 63.8% [81/127], and 50.4% [64/127], respectively), when the median cJADAS10 was 1.6 and 56.7% (72/127) of participants achieved cJADAS10 ≤ 5 (minimal disease activity). Rates (per 100 patient-years) of serious adverse events and serious infections through week 252 were 7.7 and 3.9, respectively. Conclusion. GO-VIVA LTE participants experienced adequate PK exposure and stable safety and immunogenicity. The majority of participants experienced no more than minimal residual disease activity. Data suggest IV golimumab treatment provided durable clinical response through week 116, with an acceptable risk-benefit profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most common pulmonary manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its prevalence has not been investigated in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The role of methotrexate (MTX) in ILD development remains under debate. This study (1) compares the incidences of ILD in patients with RA or PsA initiating a first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) to that in the general population, and (2) investigates the role of MTX comedication on ILD incidence. Methods. Patients were identified in 5 rheumatology registries. Demographics, MTX use, and disease activity were retrieved. Matched subjects from the general population were available from 4 countries. Incidence of ILD during follow-up of up to 5 years was assessed through national patient registries. Subjects with prior ILD were excluded. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for ILD incidence in patients vs the general population, and for MTX users vs nonusers. Results. During follow-up of 29,478 patients with RA and 10,919 patients with PsA initiating a first bDMARD and 362,087 population subjects, 225, 23, and 251 cases of ILD were identified, respectively. HRs for ILD (vs population subjects) were 9.7 (95% CI 7.97-11.91) in RA and 4.4 (95% CI 2.83-6.97) in PsA. HRs for ILD with MTX comedication (vs nonuse) were 1.0 (95% CI 0.72-1.25) in RA and 0.9 (95% CI 0.38-2.05) in PsA. Conclusion. Among patients with RA and PsA initiating a bDMARD, the risk of ILD was higher than in the general population, and was highest in RA. MTX comedication was not a risk determinant for ILD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Despite treatment advances, pain remains a serious problem for many children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA). To better understand pain in children with JIA and identify potentially modifiable factors, this study evaluated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Pain Interference (PI) and its relationships with other pain measures and demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and functional variables. Methods. This cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study used descriptive statistics and a mix of bivariate and multivariable analyses to describe PI and characterize relationships with other measures and variables. Results. Among 355 children with JIA, 27% reported moderate or severe PI and 13.3% reported daily pain. PI correlated with other pain measures. Increasing age, decreasing disease duration, and increasing number of active joints, as well as presence of active disease, steroid treatment, and biologic treatment, were associated with greater PI. All PROMIS psychosocial and functional measures were associated with PI in the expected direction except for PROMIS Pediatric Physical Activity, which showed no association. In multivariable analyses, only PROMIS Fatigue, PROMIS Mobility, and the exploratory interaction of PROMIS Anxiety and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment were significant. Conclusion. Moderate and severe PI was prevalent in this sample of children with JIA. PI increased with age and indicators of disease activity, but was more strongly associated with increasing fatigue and decreasing mobility. Findings support the use of PI as a short, easily administered multidimensional pain measure as part of routine clinical care. Fatigue, mobility, and disease activity should be assessed further when PI is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and rheumatologists on decision aid (DA)-led tapering of advanced therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Semistructured interviews were completed with patients and rheumatologists, embedded within a pilot study of DA-led tapering (ie, dose reduction) of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) in RA. All patients were in sustained (≥ 6 mos) remission and had chosen to reduce their therapy after a DA-led shared decision with their rheumatologist. The rheumatologists included those participating in the pilot (n = 4), and those who were not (n = 8). Reflexive thematic analysis of audiotaped and transcribed interviews identified themes in the group experiences. Results. Patients (n = 10, 6 female) unanimously found the DA easy to understand and felt confident in shared decision making about treatment tapering and managing flares. Rheumatologists' (n = 12, 5 female) perspectives on tapering bDMARDs and tsDMARDs varied widely, from very supportive to completely opposed, and influenced their views on the DA. Rheumatologists expressed concerns about patient comprehension, destabilizing a stable situation, risks of flare, and extending appointment times. Despite their initial reservations about sending the DA to all eligible patients ahead of appointments, 3 of 4 participating rheumatologists adopted this approach during the pilot, which had the benefit of facilitating patient-led conversations. Conclusion. A DA-led strategy for tapering advanced therapy in RA was acceptable to patients and feasible in practice. Sending patients a DA ahead of their appointment facilitated patient-led conversations about tapering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation of joints in response to autoimmune disorders. Once triggered, many factors were involved in the development of RA, including both cellular factors like osteoclasts, synovial fibroblasts, T cells, B cells, and soluble factors like interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-17 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), etc. The complex interplay of those factors results in such pathological abnormality as synovial hyperplasia, bone injury and multi-joint inflammation. To treat this chronic life-affecting disease, the primary drugs used in easing the patient’s symptoms are disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these traditional drugs could cause serious side effects, such as high blood pressure and stomach ulcers. Interestingly, recent discoveries on the pathogenesis of RA have led to various new kinds of drugs or therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we present a timely review of the latest development in this field, focusing on the cellular aspects of RA pathogenesis and new therapeutic methods in clinical application. Hopefully it can provide translational guide to the pre-clinical research and treatment for the autoimmune joint disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immunosuppressive therapies are associated with a risk of infections. Nevertheless, their incidence in this population remains unclear. This study aims to determine the incidence of serious respiratory tract infections (SRI) in a population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: Data from a representative sample of the French healthcare claims from 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2019 were analyzed. Exposure to immunosuppressive therapy was defined by the dispensation of drugs through community pharmacies or in hospitals. SRI diagnosis was based on ICD-10 codes from hospitalization records. A cohort analysis was performed to estimate standardized SRI incidence rates. A nested case-control analysis within this cohort was used to study the characteristics associated with SRI. Results: We identified 24,122 individuals exposed to immunosuppressive therapies, among which 1,559 developed SRI, resulting in a standardized incidence rate of 1,398 per 100,000 person-years. In this population, the risk of SRI was associated with a history of cancer (OR 2.68, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 2.24–3.21; p < 0.001), chronic respiratory disease (2.62, 95%CI 2.17–3.16; p < 0.001), end-stage renal failure (2.38, 95%CI 1.37–4.13; p = 0.003), neurodegenerative diseases (1.52, 95%CI 1.07–2.17; p = 0.026), diabetes (1.44, 95%CI 1.14–1.82; p < 0.001), psychiatric diseases (1.27, 95%CI 1.06–1.52; p < 0.001), and cardiovascular diseases (1.26, 95%CI 1.04–1.52; p = 0.002). Compared to corticosteroids alone, the risk of SRI was lower in individuals treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) only (0.44, 95%CI 0.25–0.78; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies, a history of chronic disease is associated with an increased risk of SRI. This risk is lower in those receiving csDMARD alone than corticosteroids alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease which mainly affects the spine and sacroiliac joints, causing longstanding back pain, stiffness, and limited mobility. AxSpA is an underrecognized disease in non-rheumatology practices because of its heterogeneous clinical features that may be difficult to identify. Main body: Sports medicine practitioners are well positioned to suspect and recognize axSpA among their patients with chronic back pain and refer them to a rheumatologist. Early referral to a rheumatologist is important for timely diagnosis, prompt treatment, and improved long-term outcomes for patients with axSpA. Physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain the first-line treatment for and the cornerstone of axSpA management. For patients with inadequate response to or intolerance of NSAIDs, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs are indicated. These drugs can reduce pain, inflammation, fatigue, and disability and can improve health-related quality of life. The goal of this review is to improve awareness of axSpA among sports medicine practitioners and other non-rheumatologists so that these providers ensure timely referral of patients with suspected axSpA to rheumatologists for appropriate treatment and better outcomes. We also provide an update on current treatment possibilities for axSpA and describe how rheumatologists use treatment guidelines and disease activity measures to identify and optimally treat patients with active axSpA. Conclusion: Sports medicine practitioners have an excellent opportunity to identify patients with suspected axSpA and refer them to rheumatologists in a timely manner, as well as monitor symptoms among patients diagnosed with axSpA to identify inadequately controlled disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rapid progress made in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years and the differences in patient journey between Asian and non-Asian populations call for a review of current atopic dermatitis landscape in Asia. Methods: A roundtable meeting with nine regional dermatological experts was held in June 2023 to discuss the optimal management approaches for moderate-to-severe AD, focusing on the use of advanced therapies. Results: Disease burden on patients' quality of life, treatment adherence, and financial constraints were identified as major concerns when managing patients with moderate-to-severe AD in parts of Asia. It was agreed that the Hanifin and Rajka's criteria or the UK Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis can be used to guide the clinical diagnosis of AD. Meanwhile, patient-reported outcome scales including the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool can be used alongside depression monitoring scales to monitor treatment outcomes in patients with AD, allowing a better understanding for individualized treatment. When managing moderate-to-severe AD, phototherapy should be attempted after failure with topical treatments, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and, subsequently, biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors. Systemic corticosteroids can be used as short-term therapy for acute flares. Although these advanced treatments are known to be effective, physicians have to take into consideration safety concerns and limitations when prescribing these treatments. Conclusions: Treatments in AD have evolved and its management varies country by country. Unique challenges across Asian countries necessitate a different management approach in Asian patients with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cochlear implantation has become an increasingly common strategy for aural rehabilitation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss who no longer benefit from conventional amplification. In conjunction, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become the keystone of management in numerous autoimmune conditions. Given the increasing prevalence of both, a greater proportion of patients will undergo cochlear implantation while on immune-modulating medications. While these medications are usually well tolerated, immunosuppression may put patients a higher risk for device infections. At present, this is not extensively studied within the cochlear implant literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review and review of the literature. Results: We present the case of an 81-year-old male who experienced wound dehiscence and infection secondary to leflunomide use for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Resolution of these issues was noted with a therapeutic drug holiday, and the patient has subsequently undergone re-implantation without issue. Conclusions: The case highlights a potential CI-associated wound complication in the setting of DMARD therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of both CIs and immunosuppressive therapy, future study on the potential for interaction is warranted to identify the best management strategy in the perioperative setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD) are at higher risk of severe infections because of their underlying diseases and immunosuppression. Our objective was to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with AIIRD presenting with COVID‐19 and their relation to disease severity. We explored whether variables, including underlying diagnosis, disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and COVID‐19 vaccine status, were associated with more severe forms of COVID‐19 infection. Methods: Between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, 151 patients with AIIRD and COVID‐19 infection were analysed using a binary regression model and a multinomial regression model. Results: The average age was 61.5 years, and average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.1; 106 (70.2%) patients were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 70 (46.4%) patients were receiving prednisolone. In the multivariable logistic regression model, ages between 50 and 69 years (odds ratio (OR) = 5.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.35–25.25) and older than 70 years (OR = 5.29; 95% CI = 1.21–23.14), prior prednisolone treatment (OR = 7.09; 95% CI = 2.63–19.11) and vaccination status including one and two doses (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05–0.69) and three and four doses (OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.02–0.35) were all statistically significant factors related to changes in the severity level of COVID‐19. Conclusion: Severity of COVID‐19 infection in patients with AIIRD is affected by age, background steroid use and vaccination status. Factors including sex, comorbidity, diagnosis of AIIRDs and use of DMARDs, including conventional synthetic, biologics and targeted DMARDs, were not significantly associated with COVID‐19 severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX, csDMARDs or bDMARDs. Methods Data from three completed phase III studies—RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR) and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR)—and one completed long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) were analysed up to 6.5 years [340 weeks (RA-BEAM) and 336 weeks (RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON)]. Low disease activity (LDA) [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11], clinical remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and physical function [Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤0.5] were the main outcomes assessed. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population. Results At week 340 or 336, LDA was achieved in 37%/83% of MTX-IR, 35%/83% of csDMARD-IR and 23%/73% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Remission was achieved in 20%/40% of MTX-IR, 13%/32% of csDMARD-IR and 9%/30% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. HAQ-DI ≤0.5 was reached in 31%/51% of MTX-IR, 25%/46% of csDMARD-IR and 24%/38% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Conclusion Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg demonstrated efficacy up to 6.5 years with maintained LDA/remission results across SDAI, CDAI and DAS28-hsCRP consistent with previously reported data, and was well tolerated. Trial registration United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov ; RA-BEYOND; NCT01885078. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We investigated the baseline DMARD use and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) risk among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Methods Patients with SARDs and confirmed COVID-19 infection at Mass General Brigham completed a survey ≥28 days after a positive PCR/antigen test to prospectively investigate their COVID-19 courses. We investigated DMARD use at COVID-19 onset and PASC risk. PASC was defined as any COVID-19 symptom that persisted for ≥28 days. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for PASC by DMARD class. We also used restricted mean survival time to determine the difference in symptom-free days by DMARD class in the 28-day period after infection. Results We analysed 510 patients with SARDs and COVID-19 from 11 March 2021 to 17 June 2023; 202 (40%) developed PASC. CD20 inhibitor (CD20i) users had significantly higher odds of developing PASC vs conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) users [adjusted OR (aOR) 2.69 (95% CI 1.23, 5.88)]. IL-12/23, IL-17A or IL-23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i, IL-17Ai, IL-23i) users also had significantly higher odds of PASC [aOR 3.03 (95% CI 1.08, 8.49)]. CD20i users had significantly fewer symptom-free days vs csDMARD users [aOR −4.12 (95% CI −7.29, −0.94)]. Conclusion CD20i users had significantly higher odds of PASC and fewer symptom-free days over the 28 days following COVID-19 diagnosis compared with csDMARD users. Further research is needed to investigate whether PASC risk in CD20i users may be due to prolonged infection or other immune mechanisms. The association of IL-12/23i, IL-17Ai and IL-23i with PASC calls for additional study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and genetically engineered biological drugs (biological DMARDs, or biologics) on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biologics and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity. Purpose of the study. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcutaneous injection, 160 mg/ml-0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000–500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. On weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of tender and swollen joints (TJC28 and SJC28), the level of acute-phase inflammation markers, the DAS28 (disease activity score), ESR, CRP, CDAI (clinical activity index), and the functional state index HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) were determined, as well as the safety profile of therapy was assessed. Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease in TJC28 was detected after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with olokizumab (Artlegia®) (Me baseline = 10, Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 4, p < 0.05) and a decrease in TSC28 was detected after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (Me baseline = 9, Me 4 weeks = 3.5, Me 8 weeks = 2.5, Me 12 weeks = 2.0, p < 0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me4 weeks = 21, Me4 weeks = 1, p < 0.05, ESR: Mesno = 31, Me4 weeks = 7, p < 0.05). Positive dynamics persisted on 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from week 4 in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22, p < 0.05; DAS28CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45, p < 0.05; CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0, p < 0.05. All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by week 12 of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31, p < 0.05. Conclusions. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Notch ligands and receptors, including JAG1/2, DLL1/4, and Notch1/3, are enriched on macrophages (MΦs), fibroblast‐like synoviocytes (FLS), and/or endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with normal synovial tissues (ST). Power Doppler ultrasound‐guided ST studies reveal that the Notch family is highly involved in early active RA, especially during neovascularization. In contrast, the Notch family is not implicated during the erosive stage, evidenced by their lack of correlation with radiographic damage in RA ST. Toll‐like receptors and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are the common inducers of Notch expression in RA MΦs, FLS, and endothelial cells. Among Notch ligands, JAG1 and/or DLL4 are most inducible by inflammatory responses in RA MΦs or endothelial cells and transactivate their receptors on RA FLS. TNF plays a central role on Notch ligands, as anti‐TNF good responders display JAG1/2 and DLL1/4 transcriptional downregulation in RA ST myeloid cells. In in vitro studies, TNF increases Notch3 expression in MΦs, which is further amplified by RA FLS addition. Specific disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs reduced JAG1 and Notch3 expression in MΦ and RA FLS cocultures. Organoids containing FLS and endothelial cells have increased expression of JAG1 and Notch3. Nonetheless, Methotrexate, interleukin‐6 receptor (IL‐6R) antibodies, and B cell blockers are mostly ineffective at decreasing Notch family expression. NF‐κB, MAPK, and AKT pathways are involved in Notch signaling, whereas JAK/STATs are not. Although Notch blockade has been effective in RA preclinical studies, its small molecule inhibitors have failed in phase I and II studies, suggesting that alternative strategies may be required to intercept their function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term treatment. Bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, has demonstrated tolerability and sustained clinical efficacy for up to 1 year for patients with PsA. Here, we report the longer-‍term safety and efficacy of bimekizumab up to 2 years. Methods: BE OPTIMAL (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (prior inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]) assessed subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks in patients with PsA. BE OPTIMAL included a reference arm (adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks); patients switched to bimekizumab at week 52 with no washout between treatments. BE OPTIMAL week 52 and BE COMPLETE week 16 completers were eligible for the BE VITAL open-label extension. Efficacy outcomes are reported to week 104/100 (BE OPTIMAL/BE COMPLETE). Results: A total of 710/852 (83.3%) bDMARD-naïve and 322/400 (80.5%) TNFi-IR patients completed week 104/100. Up to 104 weeks, patients treated with bimekizumab in BE OPTIMAL and BE COMPLETE had treatment-emergent adverse event incidence rates (exposure-adjusted incidence rate/100 patient-years) of 179.9 (95% CI 166.9, 193.7) and 100.3 (89.2, ‍112.4), respectively. The proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria, 100% improvement from baseline in Psorisis Area and Severity Index [PASI], minimal disease activity [MDA]) was sustained in all patients from week 52 to week 104/100. Conclusions: Bimekizumab was well tolerated for up to 2 years of treatment and no new safety signals were observed. Sustained clinical efficacy was observed up to 2 years in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with active PsA. Patients switching from adalimumab to bimekizumab demonstrated further improvement in skin and nail symptoms, and sustained efficacy in joint symptoms. Trial Registration: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581), BE VITAL (NCT04009499). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) complicated by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients with PMR which could be classified as RA and who were treated with bDMARDs were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the clinical Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score (Clin-PMR-AS) after 26 weeks of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was adverse events during the observation period. Results: A total of 203 patients with PMR which was resistant or intolerant to glucocorticoids and could be classified as RA were receiving bDMARDs and were enrolled in the study. There were 83, 82, and 38 patients in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) groups, respectively. Twenty-six weeks after bDMARD initiation, Clin-PMR-AS levels were significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group as compared to other groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed with Clin-PMR-AS as the objective variable. Body mass index (BMI), history of bDMARDs, and IL-6Ri use were identified as factors involved in Clin-PMR-AS. After adjustment for group characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, the Clin-PMR-AS score at 26 weeks was significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group (9.0) than in both the TNFi (12.4, p = 0.004) and CTLA4-Ig (15.9, p = 0.003) group. Conclusion: IL-6Ri may potentially improve the disease activity of PMR compared to other bDMARDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The evolution of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved patient prognosis. However, more real-world safety/effectiveness data comparing methotrexate (MTX), tofacitinib, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and non-TNFi biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are warranted. Methods: The CorEvitas RA Japan registry was used to identify patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed RA who initiated MTX/tofacitinib/TNFi/non-TNFi bDMARDs. Safety outcomes included incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), total cardiovascular disease, total serious infections, total herpes zoster, and total malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). Effectiveness outcomes included change from baseline (Δ) in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and proportion of patients achieving a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CDAI at month 6. Adjusted regression models were fit; marginal means were estimated. Results: Overall, 1972 patients were included in the safety cohort: MTX (N = 298); tofacitinib (N = 253); TNFi (N = 663); non-TNFi (N = 758). Mean follow-up time was 3.8, 2.9, 3.0, and 2.9 years for MTX, tofacitinib, TNFi, and non-TNFi, respectively. Adjusted incidence rates (IRs, patients with events/100 patient-years [95% confidence intervals]) for MACE and total cardiovascular disease, respectively, were numerically lower for MTX (0.34 [0, 0.83]; 0.42 [0, 0.92]) and TNFi (0.09 [0, 0.27]; 0.61 [0.15, 1.07]) versus tofacitinib (0.48 [0, 1.20]; 2.30 [0.38, 4.22]) and non-TNFi (0.77 [0.35, 1.19]; 1.28 [0.73, 1.82]). Serious infections were numerically higher for non-TNFi (4.47 [3.38, 5.56]); herpes zoster was higher for tofacitinib (7.41 [4.52, 10.29]), versus other groups. IRs for malignancies were comparable between groups. Mean ΔCDAI and rates of achieving MCID in CDAI at month 6 were generally greater with tofacitinib versus other groups. Conclusion: Some variations in incidence of safety outcomes were observed between treatments, while certain effectiveness outcomes favored tofacitinib. Sample size variation between groups and low number of safety events limited the analysis. Further studies are warranted to investigate observed differences. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05572567. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines recommend methotrexate (MTX)-anchored therapy with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs); however, tolerability issues often lead to non-adherence. Canadian data on MTX tapering and/or withdrawal following b/tsDMARD initiation are minimal. This chart review assessed frequency of MTX tapering or withdrawal following b/tsDMARD initiation and the impact on disease status in Canadian adults with RA. Methods: Eligible patients had received MTX for ≥ 3 months before b/tsDMARD initiation. The b/tsDMARD was prescribed continuously for ≥ 18 months. Patients taking > 10 mg/day oral prednisone or equivalent were excluded. Results: Eight hundred eighty-nine patients (mean baseline MTX dose 19.0 mg/week) prescribed b/tsDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor 52.1%, Janus kinase inhibitor 18.3%, interleukin-6 inhibitor [IL-6i] 11.9%, other 17.7%) were evaluated at 22 Canadian centers. Within 2 years of b/tsDMARD initiation, MTX was tapered in 123 (13.8%) patients and discontinued in 147 (16.5%), most commonly due to planned tapering (36.6%) and patient decision (27.2%), respectively, and most commonly with IL-6i use (34.9%). The MTX dose was unchanged for 582 (65.5%) patients and increased for 37 (4.2%). Missing data limit interpretations of MTX dose effects on some secondary endpoints and challenge the assertion that a disease activity measure–based treat-to-target approach is routinely used in Canadian rheumatology practice. Conclusions: Methotrexate tapering or withdrawal occurred in 30.4% of Canadians with RA within 2 years following b/tsDMARD initiation. Baseline disease activity measures were missing from many medical records. However, for patients with baseline assessments, MTX tapering or discontinuation did not worsen disease activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations. Methods: Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models. Results: Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200 mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12 weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population. Conclusion: The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728. Plain Language Summary: Rheumatoid arthritis is a disease that results in swollen and painful joints. There is currently no method to determine which treatment will work best for an individual patient. However, there may be identifying markers found in the blood that could indicate how a patient will respond to treatment. One of these possible markers is a ratio of two types of white blood cells, neutrophils and lymphocytes, which are part of the body's immune system and help the body detect and fight infection and other diseases. This ratio is referred to as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The current study evaluated whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the beginning of treatment was associated with rheumatoid arthritis treatment outcomes. Blood test results were used from 3365 patients receiving filgotinib (a medicine used to treat rheumatoid arthritis) or other therapies as part of the FINCH clinical trials. Patients were classified as having a high or low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the start of treatment. Patients receiving filgotinib over 24 weeks who had a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio showed less disease activity than patients whose ratio was low. This study provides support for the use of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a way to help determine whether a patient would benefit from filgotinib as part of their rheumatoid arthritis treatment and may help improve rheumatoid arthritis treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study. Methods: Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216. Results: The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population. Conclusions: The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343. Plain Language Summary: A long-term study looked at a drug named upadacitinib to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease that causes joint pain and damage. The study included patients whose RA was not improved by other injectable medicines. The study compared upadacitinib with another drug called abatacept. After 24 weeks, patients who were taking abatacept switched to upadacitinib, and patients taking upadacitinib continued on upadacitinib treatment for over 4 years. The researchers looked at how well the treatments worked over the long-term and if there were any side effects. The side effects with upadacitinib treatment in this long-term study were similar to side effects reported in previous studies with upadacitinib. The researchers also found that upadacitinib helped to lessen the symptoms of RA over time and helped patients complete their daily activities and reduced their pain and tiredness. This was true for patients who switched from abatacept to upadacitinib after 24 weeks and for patients who took upadacitinib from the start of the study. Patients who had not responded to other medicines also had similar improvements with upadacitinib. In conclusion, upadacitinib can help people with RA over the long term and no new safety risks were found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]