Search

The harmful side effects of opioid drugs such as respiratory depression, tolerance, dependence, and abuse potential have limited the therapeutic utility of opioids for their entire clinical history. However, no previous attempt to develop effective pain drugs that substantially ameliorate these effects has succeeded, and the current opioid epidemic affirms that they are a greater hindrance to the field of pain management than ever. Recent attempts at new opioid development have sought to reduce these side effects by minimizing engagement of the regulatory protein arrestin-3 at the mu-opioid receptor, but there is significant controversy around this approach. Here, we discuss the ongoing effort to develop safer opioids and its relevant historical context. We propose a new model that reconciles results previously assumed to be in direct conflict to explain how different signaling profiles at the mu-opioid receptor contribute to opioid tolerance and dependence. Our goal is for this framework to inform the search for a new generation of lower liability opioid analgesics.

Introduction: Opioid drugs are potent analgesics that mimic the endogenous opioid peptides, endorphins and enkephalins, by activating the µ-opioid receptor. Opioid use is limited by side effects, including significant risk of opioid use disorder. Improvement of the effect/side effect profile of opioid medications is a key pursuit of opioid research, yet there is no consensus on how to achieve this goal. One hypothesis is that the degree of arrestin-3 recruitment to the µ-opioid receptor impacts therapeutic utility. However, it is not clear whether increased or decreased interaction of the µ-opioid receptor with arrestin-3 would reduce compulsive drug-seeking. Methods: We utilized three genotypes of mice with varying abilities to recruit arrestin-3 to the µ-opioid receptor in response to morphine in a novel longitudinal operant self-administration model. We also created a quantitative method to define compulsivity in drug-seeking based on a multi-variate analysis of several operant response variables. Results: We demonstrate that arrestin-3 knockout and wild type mice have highly variable drug-seeking behavior with few genotype differences. In contrast, in mice where the µ-opioid receptor strongly recruits arrestin-3, drug-seeking behavior is much less varied. We found that mice lacking arrestin-3 were more likely to meet the criteria for compulsivity whereas mice with enhanced arrestin-3 recruitment did not develop a compulsive phenotype. Conclusion: These experiments show that a lack of arrestin-3 is not protective against the abuse liability of morphine in an operant self-administration context. Our data also suggest that opioids that engage both G protein and arrestin-3, recapitulating the endogenous signaling pattern, will reduce abuse liability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phosphorylated residues of G protein-coupled receptors bind to the N-domain of arrestin, resulting in the release of its C-terminus. This induces further allosteric conformational changes, such as polar core disruption, alteration of interdomain loops, and domain rotation, which transform arrestins into the receptor-activated state. It is widely accepted that arrestin activation occurs by conformational changes propagated from the N- to the C-domain. However, recent studies have revealed that binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to the C-domain transforms arrestins into a pre-active state. Here, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying PIP2-induced arrestin pre-activation. We compare the conformational changes of β-arrestin-2 upon binding of PIP2 or phosphorylated C-tail peptide of vasopressin receptor type 2 using hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). Introducing point mutations on the potential routes of the allosteric conformational changes and analyzing these mutant constructs with HDX-MS reveals that PIP2-binding at the C-domain affects the back loop, which destabilizes the gate loop and βXX to transform β-arrestin-2 into the pre-active state. Synopsis: The mechanism of β-arrestin (βarr2) pre-activation by PIP2 has not yet been fully understood. This study suggests that PIP2 induces allosteric conformational changes in βarr2, which ultimately affect the conformational dynamics of the βXX strand. PIP2 increases the conformational dynamics of the βXX strand, indicating the pre-activation of βarr2. HDX-MS and mutational studies have revealed the allosteric structural pathway from the PIP2-binding sites to the βXX strand. Conformational perturbation of the back loop through the gate loop of βarr2 is the allosteric structural pathway of the PIP2-induced pre-activation of βarr2. The mechanism of β-arrestin (βarr2) pre-activation by PIP2 has not yet been fully understood. This study suggests that PIP2 induces allosteric conformational changes in βarr2, which ultimately affect the conformational dynamics of the βXX strand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple mutations in the Rhodopsin gene cause sector retinitis pigmentosa in humans and a corresponding light-exacerbated retinal degeneration (RD) in animal models. Previously we have shown that T4K rhodopsin requires photoactivation to exert its toxic effect. Here we further investigated the mechanisms involved in rod cell death caused by T4K rhodopsin in mixed male and female Xenopus laevis. In this model, RD was prevented by rearing animals in constant darkness but surprisingly also in constant light. RD was maximized by light cycles containing at least 1 h of darkness and 20 min of light exposure, light intensities >750 lux, and by a sudden light onset. Under conditions of frequent light cycling, RD occurred rapidly and synchronously, with massive shedding of ROS fragments into the RPE initiated within hours and subsequent death and phagocytosis of rod cell bodies. RD was minimized by reduced light levels, pretreatment with constant light, and gradual light onset. RD was prevented by genetic ablation of the retinal isomerohydrolase RPE65 and exacerbated by ablation of phototransduction components GNAT1, SAG, and GRK1. Our results indicate that photoactivated T4K rhodopsin is toxic, that cell death requires synchronized photoactivation of T4K rhodopsin, and that toxicity is mitigated by interaction with other rod outer segment proteins regardless of whether they participate in activation or shutoff of phototransduction. In contrast, RD caused by P23H rhodopsin does not require photoactivation of the mutant protein, as it was exacerbated by RPE65 ablation, suggesting that these phenotypically similar disorders may require different treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GRK2 and arrestin3, key players in the functional regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are ubiquitinated by Mdm2, a nuclear protein. The agonist-induced increase in arrestin3 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus, underscoring the crucial role of its nuclear translocation in this process. The ubiquitination of arrestin3 occurs in the nucleus, highlighting the pivotal role of its nuclear translocation in this process. In contrast, GRK2 cannot translocate into the nucleus; thus, facilitation of the cytosolic translocation of nuclear Mdm2 is required to ubiquitinate GRK2 in the cytosol. Among the explored cellular components and processes, arrestin, Gβγ, clathrin, and receptor phosphorylation were found to be required for the nuclear import of arrestin3, the ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus, nuclear export of Mdm2, and the ubiquitination of GRK2 in the cytosol. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that agonist-induced ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus is interconnected with cytosolic GRK2 ubiquitination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Albuminuria is characterized by a disruption of the glomerular filtration barrier, which is composed of the fenestrated endothelium, the glomerular basement membrane, and the slit diaphragm. Nephrin is a major component of the slit diaphragm. Apart from hemodynamic effects, Ang II enhances albuminuria by β‐Arrestin2‐mediated nephrin endocytosis. Blocking the AT1 receptor with candesartan and irbesartan reduces the Ang II‐mediated nephrin‐β‐Arrestin2 interaction. The inhibition of MAPK ERK 1/2 blocks Ang II‐enhanced nephrin‐β‐Arrestin2 binding. ERK 1/2 signaling, which follows AT1 receptor activation, is mediated by G‐protein signaling, EGFR transactivation, and β‐Arrestin2 recruitment. A mutant AT1 receptor defective in EGFR transactivation and β‐Arrestin2 recruitment reduces the Ang II‐mediated increase in nephrin β‐Arrestin2 binding. The mutation of β‐Arrestin2K11,K12, critical for AT1 receptor binding, completely abrogates the interaction with nephrin, independent of Ang II stimulation. β‐Arrestin2K11R,K12R does not influence nephrin cell surface expression. The data presented here deepen our molecular understanding of a blood‐pressure‐independent molecular mechanism of AT‐1 receptor blockers (ARBs) in reducing albuminuria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While all reversible receptor-targeting radioligands for positron emission tomography (PET) can be displaced by competition with an antagonist at the receptor, many radiotracers show limited occupancies using agonists even at high doses. [11C]Raclopride, a D2/D3 receptor radiotracer with rapid kinetics, can identify the direction of changes in the neurotransmitter dopamine, but quantitative interpretation of the relationship between dopamine levels and radiotracer binding has proven elusive. Agonist-induced receptor desensitization and internalization, a homeostatic mechanism to downregulate neurotransmitter-mediated function, can shift radioligand-receptor binding affinity and confound PET interpretations of receptor occupancy. In this study, we compared occupancies induced by amphetamine (AMP) in drug-naive wild-type (WT) and internalization-compromised β-arrestin-2 knockout (KO) mice using a within-scan drug infusion to modulate the kinetics of [11C]raclopride. We additionally performed studies at 3 h following AMP pretreatment, with the hypothesis that receptor internalization should markedly attenuate occupancy on the second challenge, because dopamine cannot access internalized receptors. Without prior AMP treatment, WT mice exhibited somewhat larger binding potential than KO mice but similar AMP-induced occupancy. At 3 h after AMP treatment, WT mice exhibited binding potentials that were 15 % lower than KO mice. At this time point, occupancy was preserved in KO mice but suppressed by 60 % in WT animals, consistent with a model in which most receptors contributing to binding potential in WT animals were not functional. These results demonstrate that arrestin-mediated receptor desensitization and internalization produce large effects in PET [11C]raclopride occupancy studies using agonist challenges.

BackgroundSecond-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frontline treatments for serious mental illness. Often, individual patients benefit only from some SGAs and not others. The mechanisms underlying this unpredictability in treatment efficacy remain unclear. All SGAs bind the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) and are traditionally considered antagonists for dopamine receptor signaling.MethodsHere, we used a combination of two-photon calcium imaging, in vitro signaling assays, and mouse behavior to assess signaling by SGAs at D3R.ResultsWe report that some clinically important SGAs function as arrestin-3 agonists at D3R, resulting in modulation of calcium channels localized to the site of action potential initiation in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons. We further show that chronic treatment with an arrestin-3 agonist SGA, but not an antagonist SGA, abolishes D3R function through postendocytic receptor degradation by GASP1 (G protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein-1).ConclusionsThese results implicate D3R-arrestin-3 signaling as a source of SGA variability, highlighting the importance of including arrestin-3 signaling in characterizations of drug action. Furthermore, they suggest that postendocytic receptor trafficking that occurs during chronic SGA treatment may contribute to treatment efficacy.

The α-arrestin ARRDC3 is a recently discovered tumor suppressor in invasive breast cancer that functions as a multifaceted adaptor protein to control protein trafficking and cellular signaling. However, the molecular mechanisms that control ARRDC3 function are unknown. Other arrestins are known to be regulated by posttranslational modifications, suggesting that ARRDC3 may be subject to similar regulatory mechanisms. Here we report that ubiquitination is a key regulator of ARRDC3 function and is mediated primarily by two proline-rich PPXY motifs in the ARRDC3 C-tail domain. Ubiquitination and the PPXY motifs are essential for ARRDC3 function in regulating GPCR trafficking and signaling. Additionally, ubiquitination and the PPXY motifs mediate ARRDC3 protein degradation, dictate ARRDC3 subcellular localization, and are required for interaction with the NEDD4-family E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP2. These studies demonstrate a role for ubiquitination in regulating ARRDC3 function and reveal a mechanism by which ARRDC3 divergent functions are controlled.

Several branches of arrestin-mediated signaling are initiated by G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-bound arrestins. Numerous other signaling functions are mediated by free arrestins, including the mutants that cannot bind GPCRs. Biased ligands and receptor barcoding by phosphorylation patterns can only affect arrestin functions that depend on their binding to GPCRs. Manipulation of receptor-independent arrestin functions requires molecules that directly act on arrestins. Biological activity of free arrestins is often overlooked. Based on available data, we compare arrestin-mediated signaling that requires and does not require binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Receptor-bound arrestins activate ERK1/2, Src, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Yet, arrestin-3 regulation of Src family member Fgr does not appear to involve receptors. Free arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK family kinases, preferentially binds E3 ubiquitin ligases Mdm2 and parkin, and facilitates parkin-dependent mitophagy. The binding of arrestins to microtubules and calmodulin and their function in focal adhesion disassembly and apoptosis also do not involve receptors. Biased GPCR ligands and the phosphorylation barcode can only affect receptor-dependent arrestin signaling. Thus, elucidation of receptor dependence or independence of arrestin functions has important scientific and therapeutic implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first member of the arrestin family, visual arrestin-1, was discovered in the late 1970s. Later, the other three mammalian subtypes were identified and cloned. The first described function was regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling: arrestins bind active phosphorylated GPCRs, blocking their coupling to G proteins. It was later discovered that receptor-bound and free arrestins interact with numerous proteins, regulating GPCR trafficking and various signaling pathways, including those that determine cell fate. Arrestins have no enzymatic activity; they function by organizing multi-protein complexes and localizing their interaction partners to particular cellular compartments. Today we understand the molecular mechanism of arrestin interactions with GPCRs better than the mechanisms underlying other functions. However, even limited knowledge enabled the construction of signaling-biased arrestin mutants and extraction of biologically active monofunctional peptides from these multifunctional proteins. Manipulation of cellular signaling with arrestin-based tools has research and likely therapeutic potential: re-engineered proteins and their parts can produce effects that conventional small-molecule drugs cannot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: ANG (angiotensin II) elicits dipsogenic and pressor responses via activation of the canonical Gαq (G-protein component of the AT1R [angiotensin type 1 receptor])-mediated AT1R in the subfornical organ. Recently, we demonstrated that ARRB2 (β-arrestin 2) global knockout mice exhibit a higher preference for salt and exacerbated pressor response to deoxycorticosterone acetate salt. However, whether ARRB2 within selective neuroanatomical nuclei alters physiological responses to ANG is unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that ARRB2, specifically in the subfornical organ, counterbalances maladaptive dipsogenic and pressor responses to the canonical AT1R signaling. METHODS: Male and female Arrb2 FLOX mice received intracerebroventricular injection of either adeno-associated virus (AAV)-Cre-GFP (green fluorescent protein) to induce brain-specific deletion of ARRB2 (Arrb2 ICV-Cre). Arrb2 FLOX mice receiving ICV-AAV-GFP were used as control (Arrb2 ICV-Control). Infection with ICV-AAV-Cre primarily targeted the subfornical organ with few off targets. Fluid intake was evaluated using the 2-bottle choice paradigm with 1 bottle containing water and 1 containing 0.15 mol/L NaCl. RESULTS: Arrb2 ICV-Cre mice exhibited a greater pressor response to acute ICV-ANG infusion. At baseline conditions, Arrb2 ICV-Cre mice exhibited a significant increase in saline intake compared with controls, resulting in a saline preference. Furthermore, when mice were subjected to water-deprived or sodium-depleted conditions, which would naturally increase endogenous ANG levels, Arrb2 ICV-Cre mice exhibited elevated saline intake. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data indicate that ARRB2 in selective cardiovascular nuclei in the brain, including the subfornical organ, counterbalances canonical AT1R responses to both exogenous and endogenous ANG. Stimulation of the AT1R/ARRB axis in the brain may represent a novel strategy to treat hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Cellular responses to external stress allow microorganisms to adapt to a vast array of environmental conditions, including infection sites. The molecular mechanisms behind these responses are studied to gain insight into microbial pathogenesis, which could lead to new antimicrobial therapies. Here, we explore a role for arrestin protein-mediated ubiquitination in stress response and pathogenesis in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. In a previous study, we identified four arrestin-like proteins in C. neoformans and found that one of these is required for efficient membrane synthesis, likely by directing interaction between fatty acid synthases and the Rsp5 E3 ubiquitin ligase. Here, we further explore Cn Rsp5 function and determine that this single Ub ligase is absolutely required for pathogenesis and survival in the presence of cellular stress. Additionally, we show that a second arrestin-like protein, Ali2, similarly facilitates interaction between Rsp5 and some of its protein targets. Of the four postulated C. neoformans arrestin-like proteins, Ali2 appears to contribute the most to C. neoformans pathogenesis, likely by directing Rsp5 to pathogenesis-related ubiquitination targets. A proteomics-based differential ubiquitination screen revealed that several known cell surface proteins are ubiquitinated by Rsp5 and a subset also requires Ali2 for their ubiquitination. Rsp5-mediated ubiquitination alters the stability and the localization of these proteins. A loss of Rsp5-mediated ubiquitination results in cell wall defects that increase susceptibility to external stresses. These findings support a model in which arrestin-like proteins guide Rsp5 to ubiquitinate specific target proteins, some of which are required for survival during stress.IMPORTANCEMicrobial proteins involved in human infectious diseases often need to be modified by specific chemical additions to be fully functional. Here, we explore the role of a particular protein modification, ubiquitination, in infections due to the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. We identified a complex of proteins responsible for adding ubiquitin groups to fungal proteins, and this complex is required for virulence. These proteins are fungal specific and might be targets for novel anti-infection therapy.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist within a landscape of interconvertible conformational states and in dynamic equilibrium between monomers and higher-order oligomers, both influenced by ligand binding. Here, we show that a homobivalent ligand formed by equal chromenopyrazole moieties as pharmacophores, connected by 14 methylene units, can modulate the dynamics of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor (CB2R) homodimerization by simultaneously binding both protomers of the CB2R-CB2R homodimer. Computational and pharmacological experiments showed that one of the ligand pharmacophores binds to the orthosteric site of one protomer, and the other pharmacophore to a membrane-oriented pocket between transmembranes 1 and 7 of the partner protomer. This results in unique pharmacological properties, including increased potency in Gi-mediated signaling and enhanced recruitment of β-arrestin. Thus, by modulating dimerization dynamics, it may be possible to fine-tune CB2R activity, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes.

IntroductionOpioid drugs are potent analgesics that mimic the endogenous opioid peptides, endorphins and enkephalins, by activating the µ-opioid receptor. Opioid use is limited by side effects, including significant risk of opioid use disorder. Improvement of the effect/side effect profile of opioid medications is a key pursuit of opioid research, yet there is no consensus on how to achieve this goal. One hypothesis is that the degree of arrestin-3 recruitment to the µ-opioid receptor impacts therapeutic utility. However, it is not clear whether increased or decreased interaction of the µ-opioid receptor with arrestin-3 would reduce compulsive drug-seeking.MethodsWe utilized three genotypes of mice with varying abilities to recruit arrestin-3 to the µ-opioid receptor in response to morphine in a novel longitudinal operant self-administration model. We also created a quantitative method to define compulsivity in drug-seeking based on a multi-variate analysis of several operant response variables.ResultsWe demonstrate that arrestin-3 knockout and wild type mice have highly variable drug-seeking behavior with few genotype differences. In contrast, in mice where the µ-opioid receptor strongly recruits arrestin-3, drug-seeking behavior is much less varied. We found that mice lacking arrestin-3 were more likely to meet the criteria for compulsivity whereas mice with enhanced arrestin-3 recruitment did not develop a compulsive phenotype.ConclusionThese experiments show that a lack of arrestin-3 is not protective against the abuse liability of morphine in an operant self-administration context. Our data also suggest that opioids that engage both G protein and arrestin-3, recapitulating the endogenous signaling pattern, will reduce abuse liability.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) promote the expression of immediate early genes required for learning and memory. Here, we showed that β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) stimulation induced the nuclear export of phosphodiesterase 4D5 (PDE4D5), an enzyme that degrades the second messenger cAMP, to enable memory consolidation. We demonstrated that the endocytosis of β2AR phosphorylated by GPCR kinases (GRKs) mediated arrestin3-dependent nuclear export of PDE4D5, which was critical for promoting nuclear cAMP signaling and gene expression in hippocampal neurons for memory consolidation. Inhibition of the arrestin3-PDE4D5 association prevented β2AR-induced nuclear cAMP signaling without affecting receptor endocytosis. Direct PDE4 inhibition rescued β2AR-induced nuclear cAMP signaling and ameliorated memory deficits in mice expressing a form of the β2AR that could not be phosphorylated by GRKs. These data reveal how β2AR phosphorylated by endosomal GRK promotes the nuclear export of PDE4D5, leading to nuclear cAMP signaling, changes in gene expression, and memory consolidation. This study also highlights the translocation of PDEs as a mechanism to promote cAMP signaling in specific subcellular locations downstream of GPCR activation.

Background/Aim: The presence of a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) even in small amounts may trigger tissue damage through immunological or other mechanisms, irrespective of the potential for malignant transformation. The aim of the study was to present a case of monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance with ocular manifestations and discuss relevant literature. Case Report: In our case, a patient presented with vision disturbances that was eventually attributed to the underlying IgM MGUS after extensive workup to exclude other potential etiologies. The patient showed a clinical response with the fixed-duration DRC (dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide) regimen that persisted for at least 1.5 years. Herein, we present, in detail, the patient management and discuss the underlying pathophysiology of this rare entity with few available published data in this field. Conclusion: A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary in order to detect the association between MGUS and a clinical sign or symptom that cannot be attributed elsewhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GRK2 and arrestin3, key players in the functional regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are ubiquitinated by Mdm2, a nuclear protein. The agonist-induced increase in arrestin3 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus, underscoring the crucial role of its nuclear translocation in this process. The ubiquitination of arrestin3 occurs in the nucleus, highlighting the pivotal role of its nuclear translocation in this process. In contrast, GRK2 cannot translocate into the nucleus; thus, facilitation of the cytosolic translocation of nuclear Mdm2 is required to ubiquitinate GRK2 in the cytosol. Among the explored cellular components and processes, arrestin, Gβγ, clathrin, and receptor phosphorylation were found to be required for the nuclear import of arrestin3, the ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus, nuclear export of Mdm2, and the ubiquitination of GRK2 in the cytosol. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that agonist-induced ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus is interconnected with cytosolic GRK2 ubiquitination.

PurposeLight detection in retinal rod photoreceptors is initiated by activation of the visual pigment rhodopsin. A critical, yet often-overlooked, step enabling efficient perception of light is rhodopsin dephosphorylation mediated by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). PP2A deficiency has been reported to impair rhodopsin regeneration after phosphorylation by G protein receptor kinase 1 (GRK1) and binding of arrestin (Arr1), thereby delaying rod dark adaptation. However, its effects on the viability of photoreceptors in the absence of GRK1 and Arr1 remain unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of PP2A deficiency in the absence of GRK1 or Arr1, both of which have been implicated in Oguchi disease, a form of night blindness.MethodsRod-specific mice lacking the predominant catalytic Cα-subunit of PP2A were crossed with the Grk1-/- or Arr1-/- strains to obtain double knockout lines. Rod photoreceptor viability was analyzed in histological cross-sections of the retina stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and rod function was evaluated by ex vivo electroretinography.ResultsPP2A deficiency alone did not impair photoreceptor viability up to 12 months of age. Retinal degeneration was more pronounced in rods lacking GRK1 compared to rods lacking Arr1, and degeneration was accelerated in both Grk1-/- or Arr1-/- strains where PP2A was also deleted. In Arr1-/- mice, rod maximal photoresponse amplitudes were reduced by 80% at 3 months, and this diminution was enhanced further with concomitant PP2A deficiency.ConclusionsThese results suggest that although PP2A is not required for the survival of rods, its deletion accelerates the degeneration induced by the absence of either GRK1 or Arr1.

Significance: Adaptor proteins control the spatiotemporal dynamics of cellular signaling. Dysregulation of adaptor protein function can cause aberrant cell signaling and promote cancer. The arrestin family of adaptor proteins are known to regulate signaling by the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRs are highly druggable and implicated in cancer progression. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for arrestin dysregulation and the impact on GPCR function in cancer have yet to be fully elucidated. Recent Advances: A new family of mammalian arrestins, termed the α-arrestins, was recently discovered. The α-arrestin, arrestin domain-containing protein 3 (ARRDC3), in particular, has been identified as a tumor suppressor and is reported to control cellular signaling of GPCRs in cancer. Critical Issues: Compared with the extensively studied mammalian β-arrestins, there is limited information regarding the regulatory mechanisms that control α-arrestin activation and function. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms that regulate ARRDC3, which include post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. We also provide evidence that ARRDC3 can interact with a wide array of proteins that control diverse biological functions. Future Directions: ARRDC3 interacts with numerous proteins and is likely to display diverse functions in cancer, metabolic disease, and other syndromes. Thus, understanding the regulatory mechanisms of ARRDC3 activity in various cellular contexts is critically important. Recent studies suggest that α-arrestins may be regulated through post-translational modification, which is known to impact adaptor protein function. However, additional studies are needed to determine how these regulatory mechanisms affect ARRDC3 tumor suppressor function. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1066-1079.

Arrestins were discovered for their role in homologous desensitization of G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). Later non‐visual arrestins were shown to regulate several signaling pathways. Some of these pathways require arrestin binding to GPCRs, the regulation of others is receptor independent. Here, we demonstrate that arrestin‐3 binds the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin via multiple sites, preferentially interacting with its RING0 domain. Identification of the parkin domains involved suggests that arrestin‐3 likely relieves parkin autoinhibition and/or stabilizes the enzymatically active “open” conformation of parkin. Arrestin‐3 binding enhances ubiquitination by parkin of the mitochondrial protein mitofusin‐1 and facilitates parkin‐mediated mitophagy in HeLa cells. Furthermore, arrestin‐3 and its mutant with enhanced parkin binding rescue mitofusin‐1 ubiquitination and mitophagy in the presence of the Parkinson's disease‐associated R275W parkin mutant, which is defective in both functions. Thus, modulation of parkin activity via arrestin‐3 might be a novel strategy of anti‐parkinsonian therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Animal opsins are light activated G-protein-coupled receptors, capable of optogenetic control of G-protein signalling for research or therapeutic applications. Animal opsins offer excellent photosensitivity, but their temporal resolution can be limited by long photoresponse duration when expressed outside their native cellular environment. Here, we explore methods for addressing this limitation for a prototypical animal opsin (human rod opsin) in HEK293T cells. We find that the application of the canonical rhodopsin kinase (GRK1)/visual arrestin signal termination mechanism to this problem is complicated by a generalised suppressive effect of GRK1 expression. This attenuation can be overcome using phosphorylation-independent mutants of arrestin, especially when these are tethered to the opsin protein. We further show that point mutations targeting the Schiff base stability of the opsin can also reduce signalling lifetime. Finally, we apply one such mutation (E122Q) to improve the temporal fidelity of restored visual responses following ectopic opsin expression in the inner retina of a mouse model of retinal degeneration (rd1). Our results reveal that these two strategies (targeting either arrestin binding or Schiff-base hydrolysis) can produce more time-delimited opsin signalling under heterologous expression and establish the potential of this approach to improve optogenetic performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Visual arrestin (Arr1) terminates rhodopsin signaling by blocking its interaction with transducin. To do this, Arr1 translocates from the inner to the outer segment of photoreceptors upon light stimulation. Mounting evidence indicates that inositol phosphates (InsPs) affect Arr1 activity, but the Arr1-InsP molecular interaction remains poorly defined. We report the structure of bovine Arr1 in a ligand-free state featuring a near-complete model of the previously unresolved C-tail, which plays a crucial role in regulating Arr1 activity. InsPs bind to the N-domain basic patch thus displacing the C-tail, suggesting that they prime Arr1 for interaction with rhodopsin and help direct Arr1 translocation. These structures exhibit intact polar cores, suggesting that C-tail removal by InsP binding is insufficient to activate Arr1. These results show how Arr1 activity can be controlled by endogenous InsPs in molecular detail.

β-Arrestins are master regulators of cellular signaling that operate by desensitizing ligand-activated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the plasma membrane and promoting their subsequent endocytosis. The endocytic activity of β-arrestins is ligand dependent, triggered by GPCR binding, and increasingly recognized to have a multitude of downstream signaling and trafficking consequences that are specifically programmed by the bound GPCR. However, only one biochemical 'mode' for GPCR-mediated triggering of the endocytic activity is presently known - displacement of the β-arrestin C-terminus (CT) to expose clathrin-coated pit-binding determinants that are masked in the inactive state. Here, we revise this view by uncovering a second mode of GPCR-triggered endocytic activity that is independent of the β-arrestin CT and, instead, requires the cytosolic base of the β-arrestin C-lobe (CLB). We further show each of the discrete endocytic modes is triggered in a receptor-specific manner, with GPCRs that bind β-arrestin transiently ('class A') primarily triggering the CLB-dependent mode and GPCRs that bind more stably ('class B') triggering both the CT and CLB-dependent modes in combination. Moreover, we show that different modes have opposing effects on the net signaling output of receptors - with the CLB-dependent mode promoting rapid signal desensitization and the CT-dependent mode enabling prolonged signaling. Together, these results fundamentally revise understanding of how β-arrestins operate as efficient endocytic adaptors while facilitating diversity and flexibility in the control of cell signaling.

The first member of the arrestin family, visual arrestin-1, was discovered in the late 1970s. Later, the other three mammalian subtypes were identified and cloned. The first described function was regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling: arrestins bind active phosphorylated GPCRs, blocking their coupling to G proteins. It was later discovered that receptor-bound and free arrestins interact with numerous proteins, regulating GPCR trafficking and various signaling pathways, including those that determine cell fate. Arrestins have no enzymatic activity; they function by organizing multi-protein complexes and localizing their interaction partners to particular cellular compartments. Today we understand the molecular mechanism of arrestin interactions with GPCRs better than the mechanisms underlying other functions. However, even limited knowledge enabled the construction of signaling-biased arrestin mutants and extraction of biologically active monofunctional peptides from these multifunctional proteins. Manipulation of cellular signaling with arrestin-based tools has research and likely therapeutic potential: re-engineered proteins and their parts can produce effects that conventional small-molecule drugs cannot.

Many peptide-activated rhodopsin-like GPCRs share a β-hairpin folding motif in the extracellular loop 2 (ECL2), which interacts with the peptide ligand while at the same time being connected to transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) via a highly conserved disulfide bond. Currently, it remains unknown whether the coupling of the specifically shaped ECL2 to TM3 influences the activation of peptide-activated GPCRs. We investigated this possibility in a selection of peptide GPCRs with known structures. Most of the receptors with cysteine to alanine mutations folded like the respective wild-type and resided in the cell membrane, challenging pure folding stabilization by the disulfide bridge. G-protein signaling of the disulfide mutants was retained to a greater extent in secretin-like GPCRs than in rhodopsin-like GPCRs, while recruitment of arrestin was completely abolished in both groups, which may be linked to alterations in ligand residence time. We found a correlation between receptor activity of the neuropeptide Y2 receptor and alterations in ECL2 dynamics using engineered disulfide bridges or site-directed spin labeling and EPR spectroscopy. These data highlight the functional importance of the TM3-ECL2 link for the activation of specific signaling pathways in peptide-activated GPCRs, which might have implications for future drug discovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R) is an essential G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in renal regulation of water homeostasis. Upon stimulation, the V2R activates Gαs and Gαq/11, which is followed by robust recruitment of β-arrestins and receptor internalization into endosomes. Unlike canonical GPCR signaling, the β-arrestin association with the V2R does not terminate Gαs activation, and thus, Gαs-mediated signaling is sustained while the receptor is internalized. Here, we demonstrate that this V2R ability to co-interact with G protein/β-arrestin and promote endosomal G protein signaling is not restricted to Gαs, but also involves Gαq/11. Furthermore, our data imply that β-arrestins potentiate Gαs/Gαq/11 activation at endosomes rather than terminating their signaling. Surprisingly, we found that the V2R internalizes and promote endosomal G protein activation independent of β-arrestins to a minor degree. These new observations challenge the current model of endosomal GPCR signaling and suggest that this event can occur in both β-arrestin-dependent and -independent manners.

E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 facilitates β-arrestin ubiquitination, leading to the internalization of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this process, β-arrestins bind to Mdm2 and recruit it to the receptor; however, the molecular architecture of the β-arrestin-Mdm2 complex has not been elucidated yet. Here, we identified the β-arrestin-binding region (ABR) on Mdm2 and solved the crystal structure of β-arrestin1 in complex with Mdm2ABR peptide. The acidic residues of Mdm2ABR bind to the positively charged concave side of the β-arrestin1 N-domain. The C-tail of β-arrestin1 is still bound to the N-domain, indicating that Mdm2 binds to the inactive state of β-arrestin1, whereas the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of GPCRs binds to activate β-arrestins. The overlapped binding site of Mdm2 and GPCR C-tails on β-arrestin1 suggests that the binding of GPCR C-tails might trigger the release of Mdm2. Moreover, hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments further show that Mdm2ABR binding to β-arrestin1 induces the interdomain interface to be more dynamic and uncouples the IP6-induced oligomer of β-arrestin1. These results show how the E3 ligase, Mdm2, interacts with β-arrestins to promote the internalization of GPCRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among the four mammalian subtypes, only arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK3 in cells. In available structures, Lys-295 in the lariat loop of arrestin-3 and its homologue Lys-294 in arrestin-2 directly interact with the activator-attached phosphates. We compared the roles of arrestin-3 conformational equilibrium and Lys-295 in GPCR binding and JNK3 activation. Several mutants with enhanced ability to bind GPCRs showed much lower activity towards JNK3, whereas a mutant that does not bind GPCRs was more active. The subcellular distribution of mutants did not correlate with GPCR recruitment or JNK3 activation. Charge neutralization and reversal mutations of Lys-295 differentially affected receptor binding on different backgrounds but had virtually no effect on JNK3 activation. Thus, GPCR binding and arrestin-3-assisted JNK3 activation have distinct structural requirements, suggesting that facilitation of JNK3 activation is the function of arrestin-3 that is not bound to a GPCR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestin-1, or visual arrestin, exhibits an exquisite selectivity for light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh*) over its other functional forms. That selectivity is believed to be mediated by two well-established structural elements in the arrestin-1 molecule, the activation sensor detecting the active conformation of rhodopsin and the phosphorylation sensor responsive to the rhodopsin phosphorylation, which only active phosphorylated rhodopsin can engage simultaneously. However, in the crystal structure of the arrestin-1–rhodopsin complex there are arrestin-1 residues located close to rhodopsin, which do not belong to either sensor. Here we tested by site-directed mutagenesis the functional role of these residues in wild type arrestin-1 using a direct binding assay to P-Rh* and light-activated unphosphorylated rhodopsin (Rh*). We found that many mutations either enhanced the binding only to Rh* or increased the binding to Rh* much more than to P-Rh*. The data suggest that the native residues in these positions act as binding suppressors, specifically inhibiting the arrestin-1 binding to Rh* and thereby increasing arrestin-1 selectivity for P-Rh*. This calls for the modification of a widely accepted model of the arrestin–receptor interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Members of the arrestin superfamily have great propensity of self-association, but the physiological significance of this phenomenon is unclear. To determine the biological role of visual arrestin-1 oligomerization in rod photoreceptors, we expressed mutant arrestin-1 with severely impaired self-association in mouse rods and analyzed mice of both sexes. We show that the oligomerization-deficient mutant is capable of quenching rhodopsin signaling normally, as judged by electroretinography and single-cell recording. Like wild type, mutant arrestin-1 is largely excluded from the outer segments in the dark, proving that the normal intracellular localization is not due the size exclusion of arrestin-1 oligomers. In contrast to wild type, supraphysiological expression of the mutant causes shortening of the outer segments and photoreceptor death. Thus, oligomerization reduces the cytotoxicity of arrestin-1 monomer, ensuring long-term photoreceptor survival.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Visual arrestin-1 forms dimers and tetramers. The biological role of its oligomerization is unclear. To test the role of arrestin-1 self-association, we expressed oligomerization-deficient mutant in arrestin-1 knock-out mice. The mutant quenches light-induced rhodopsin signaling like wild type, demonstrating that in vivo monomeric arrestin-1 is necessary and sufficient for this function. In rods, arrestin-1 moves from the inner segments and cell bodies in the dark to the outer segments in the light. Nonoligomerizing mutant undergoes the same translocation, demonstrating that the size of the oligomers is not the reason for arrestin-1 exclusion from the outer segments in the dark. High expression of oligomerization-deficient arrestin-1 resulted in rod death. Thus, oligomerization reduces the cytotoxicity of high levels of arrestin-1 monomer.

Thrombin, a procoagulant protease, cleaves and activates protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) to promote inflammatory responses and endothelial dysfunction. In contrast, activated protein C (APC), an anticoagulant protease, activates PAR1 through a distinct cleavage site and promotes anti-inflammatory responses, prosurvival, and endothelial barrier stabilization. The distinct tethered ligands formed through cleavage of PAR1 by thrombin versus APC result in unique active receptor conformations that bias PAR1 signaling. Despite progress in understanding PAR1 biased signaling, the proteins and pathways utilized by thrombin versus APC signaling to induce opposing cellular functions are largely unknown. Here, we report the global phosphoproteome induced by thrombin and APC signaling in endothelial cells with the quantification of 11,266 unique phosphopeptides using multiplexed quantitative mass spectrometry. Our results reveal unique dynamic phosphoproteome profiles of thrombin and APC signaling, an enrichment of associated biological functions, including key modulators of endothelial barrier function, regulators of gene transcription, and specific kinases predicted to mediate PAR1 biased signaling. Using small interfering RNA to deplete a subset of phosphorylated proteins not previously linked to thrombin or APC signaling, a function for afadin and adducin-1 actin binding proteins in thrombin-induced endothelial barrier disruption is unveiled. Afadin depletion resulted in enhanced thrombin-promoted barrier permeability, whereas adducin-1 depletion completely ablated thrombin-induced barrier disruption without compromising p38 signaling. However, loss of adducin-1 blocked APC-induced Akt signaling. These studies define distinct thrombin and APC dynamic signaling profiles and a rich array of proteins and biological pathways that engender PAR1 biased signaling in endothelial cells.

The type I cannabinoid G protein-coupled receptor (CB1, GPCR) is an intensely investigated pharmacological target, owing to its involvement in numerous physiological functions as well as pathological processes such as cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders and neuropathic pain. In order to develop modern medications that exert their effects through binding to the CB1 receptor, it is essential to understand the structural mechanism of activation of this protein. The pool of atomic resolution experimental structures of GPCRs has been expanding rapidly in the past decade, providing invaluable information about the function of these receptors. According to the current state of the art, the activity of GPCRs involves structurally distinct, dynamically interconverting functional states and the activation is controlled by a cascade of interconnecting conformational switches in the transmembrane domain. A current challenge is to uncover how different functional states are activated and what specific ligand properties are responsible for the selectivity towards those different functional states. Our recent studies of the μ-opioid and β2-adrenergic receptors (MOP and β2AR, respectively) revealed that the orthosteric binding pockets and the intracellular surfaces of these receptors are connected through a channel of highly conserved polar amino acids whose dynamic motions are in high correlation in the agonist- and G protein-bound active states. This and independent literature data led us to hypothesize that, in addition to consecutive conformational transitions, a shift of macroscopic polarization takes place in the transmembrane domain, which is furnished by the rearrangement of polar species through their concerted movements. Here, we examined the CB1 receptor signaling complexes utilizing microsecond scale, all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to see if our previous assumptions could be applied to the CB1 receptor too. Apart from the identification of the previously proposed general features of the activation mechanism, several specific properties of the CB1 have been indicated that could possibly be associated with the signaling profile of this receptor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

β-arrestins are multifaceted adaptor proteins that regulate various aspects of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. β-arrestins are recruited to agonist-activated and phosphorylated GPCRs at the plasma membrane, thereby preventing G protein coupling, while also targeting GPCRs for internalization via clathrin-coated pits. In addition, β-arrestins can activate various effector molecules to prosecute their role in GPCR signaling; however, the full extent of their interacting partners remains unknown. To discover potentially novel β-arrestin interacting partners, we used APEX-based proximity labeling coupled with affinity purification and quantitative mass spectrometry. We appended APEX in-frame to the C-terminus of β-arrestin1 (βarr1-APEX), which we show does not impact its ability to support agonist-stimulated internalization of GPCRs. By using coimmunoprecipitation, we show that βarr1-APEX interacts with known interacting proteins. Furthermore, following agonist stimulation βarr1-APEX labeled known βarr1-interacting partners as assessed by streptavidin affinity purification and immunoblotting. Aliquots were prepared in a similar manner and analyzed by tandem mass tag labeling and high-content quantitative mass spectrometry. Several proteins were found to be increased in abundance following GPCR stimulation. Biochemical experiments confirmed two novel proteins that interact with β-arrestin1, which we predict are novel ligand-stimulated βarr1 interacting partners. Our study highlights that βarr1-APEX-based proximity labeling represents a valuable approach to identifying novel players involved in GPCR signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significance: Thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP) is a member of the arrestin fold superfamily with important cellular functions, including cellular transport, mitochondrial energy generation, and protein cycling. It is the only arrestin-domain protein known to covalently bind to thioredoxin and plays roles in glucose metabolism, inflammation, apoptosis, and cancer. Recent Advances: The crystal structure of the TXNIP-thioredoxin complex provided details about this fascinating interaction. Recent studies showed that TXNIP is induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, activates NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes, and can regulate glucose transport into cells. The tumor suppressor role of TXNIP in various cancer types and the role of TXNIP in fructose absorption are now described. Critical Issues: The influence of TXNIP on redox state is more complex than its interaction with thioredoxin. Future Directions: It is incompletely understood which functions of TXNIP are thioredoxin-dependent. It is also unclear whether TXNIP binding can inhibit glucose transporters without endocytosis. TXNIP-regulated control of ER stress should also be investigated further. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 38, 442–460. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Arrestin or G protein bias may be desirable for novel cannabinoid therapeutics. Arrestin‐2 and arrestin‐3 translocation to CB1 receptor have been suggested to mediate different functions that may be exploited with biased ligands. Here, the requirement of a recently described phosphorylation motif 'pxxp' (where 'p' denotes phosphorylatable serine or threonine and 'x' denotes any other amino acid) within the CB1 receptor C‐terminus for interaction with different arrestin subtypes was examined. Experimental approach: Site‐directed mutagenesis was conducted to generate nine different phosphorylation‐impaired CB1 receptor C‐terminal mutants. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) was employed to measure arrestin‐2/3 translocation and G protein dissociation of a high efficacy agonist for each mutant. Immunocytochemistry was used to quantify receptor expression. Key results: The effects of each mutation were shared for arrestin‐2 and arrestin‐3 translocation to CB1 receptor pxxp motifs are partially required for arrestin‐2/3 translocation, but translocation was not completely inhibited until all phosphorylation sites were mutated. The rate of arrestin translocation was reduced with simultaneous mutation of S425 and S429. Desensitisation of G protein dissociation was inhibited in different mutants proportional to the extent of their respective loss of arrestin translocation. Conclusions and implications: These data do not support the existence of an 'essential' pxxp motif for arrestin translocation to CB1 receptor. These data also identify that arrestin‐2 and arrestin‐3 have equivalent phosphorylation requirements within the CB1 receptor C‐terminus, suggesting arrestin subtype‐selective biased ligands may not be viable and that different regions of the C‐terminus contribute differently to arrestin translocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aortic aneurysm (AA) is a "silent killer" human disease with no effective treatment. Although the therapeutic potential of various pharmacological agents have been evaluated, there are no reports of β-arrestin-biased AT1R agonist (TRV027) used to prevent the progression of AA.Methods: We tested the hypothesis that TRV027 infusion in AngII-induced mouse model of AA prevents AA. High-fat-diet-fed ApoE-null mice were infused with AngII to induce AA and co-infused with TRV027 and a clinically used AT1R blocker Olmesartan to prevent AA. Aortas explanted from different ligand infusion groups were compared with assess different grades of AA or lack of AA.Results: AngII produced AA in ≈67% male mice with significant mortality associated with AA rupture. We observed ≈13% mortality due to aortic arch dissection without aneurysm in male mice. AngII-induced AA and mortality was prevented by co-infusion of TRV027 or Olmesartan, but through different mechanisms. In TRV027 co-infused mice aortic wall thickness, elastin content, new DNA, and protein synthesis were higher than untreated and Olmesartan co-infused mice. Co-infusion with both TRV027 and Olmesartan prevented endoplasmic reticulum stress, fibrosis, and vasomotor hyper responsiveness.Conclusions: TRV027-engaged AT1R prevented AA and associated mortality by distinct molecular mechanisms compared with the AT1R blocker, Olmesartan. Developing novel β-arrestin-biased AT1R ligands may yield promising drugs to combat AA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

β-arrestins, which have multiple cellular functions, were initially described as proteins that desensitize rhodopsin and other G protein-coupled receptors. The cytoskeletal system plays a role in various cellular processes, including intracellular transport, cell division, organization of organelles, and cell cycle. The interactome of β-arrestins includes the major proteins of the three main cytoskeletal systems: tubulins for microtubules, actins for the actin filaments, and vimentin for intermediate filaments. β-arrestins bind to microtubules and regulate their activity by recruiting signaling proteins and interacting with assembly proteins that regulate the actin cytoskeleton and the intermediate filaments. Altered regulation of the cytoskeletal system plays an essential role in the development of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, β-arrestins, which interact with the cytoskeleton, were implicated in the pathogenesis progression of these diseases and are potential targets for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders in the future.

Arrestins are important scaffolding proteins that are expressed in all vertebrate animals. They regulate cell‐signaling events upon binding to active G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and trigger endocytosis of active GPCRs. While many of the functional sites on arrestins have been characterized, the question of how these sites interact is unanswered. We used anisotropic network modeling (ANM) together with our covariance compliment techniques to survey all the available structures of the nonvisual arrestins to map how structural changes and protein‐binding affect their structural dynamics. We found that activation and clathrin binding have a marked effect on arrestin dynamics, and that these dynamics changes are localized to a small number of distant functional sites. These sites include α‐helix 1, the lariat loop, nuclear localization domain, and the C‐domain β‐sheets on the C‐loop side. Our techniques suggest that clathrin binding and/or GPCR activation of arrestin perturb the dynamics of these sites independent of structural changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestins preferentially bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The middle loop, highly conserved in all arrestin subtypes, is localized in the central crest on the GPCR-binding side. Upon receptor binding, it directly interacts with bound GPCR and demonstrates the largest movement of any arrestin element in the structures of the complexes. Comprehensive mutagenesis of the middle loop of rhodopsin-specific arrestin-1 suggests that it primarily serves as a suppressor of binding to non-preferred forms of the receptor. Several mutations in the middle loop increase the binding to unphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin severalfold, which makes them candidates for improving enhanced phosphorylation-independent arrestins. The data also suggest that enhanced forms of arrestin do not bind GPCRs exactly like the wild-type protein. Thus, the structures of the arrestin-receptor complexes, in all of which different enhanced arrestin mutants and reengineered receptors were used, must be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors) are implicated in blood pressure (BP) and fluid intake regulation. There is a developing concept that these effects are mediated by both canonical G protein signaling and noncanonical β-arrestin mediated signaling, but the contributions of each remain largely unexplored. Here, we hypothesized that β-arrestin contributes to fluid homeostasis and blood pressure (BP) regulation in deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt hypertension, a prototypical model of salt-sensitive hypertension.Methods: Global β-arrestin1 (Arrb1) and β-arrestin2 (Arrb2) knockout mice were employed to evaluate drinking behavior, and BP was evaluated in Arrb2-knockout mice. Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 mice served as controls. We measured intake of water and different sodium chloride solutions and BP employing a 2-bottle choice paradigm with and without DOCA.Results: Without DOCA (baseline), Arrb2-knockout mice exhibited a significant elevation in saline intake with no change in water intake. With DOCA treatment, Arrb2-knockout mice exhibited a significant increase in both saline and water intake. Although Arrb2-knockout mice exhibited hypernatremia at baseline conditions, we did not find significant changes in total body sodium stores or sodium palatability. In a separate cohort, BP was measured via telemetry in Arrb2-knockout and C57BL/6 mice with and without DOCA. Arrb2-knockout did not exhibit significant differences in BP before DOCA treatment when provided water alone, or when provided a choice of water and saline. However, Arrb2-knockout exhibited an increased pressor response to DOCA-salt.Conclusions: These findings suggest that in salt-sensitive hypertension, ARRB2, but not ARRB1 (β-arrestin 1), might counterbalance the canonical signaling of GPCRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist within a landscape of interconvertible conformational states and in dynamic equilibrium between monomers and higher-order oligomers, both influenced by ligand binding. Here, we show that a homobivalent ligand formed by equal chromenopyrazole moieties as pharmacophores, connected by 14 methylene units, can modulate the dynamics of the cannabinoid CB 2 receptor (CB 2 R) homodimerization by simultaneously binding both protomers of the CB 2 R-CB 2 R homodimer. Computational and pharmacological experiments showed that one of the ligand pharmacophores binds to the orthosteric site of one protomer, and the other pharmacophore to a membrane-oriented pocket between transmembranes 1 and 7 of the partner protomer. This results in unique pharmacological properties, including increased potency in G i -mediated signaling and enhanced recruitment of β-arrestin. Thus, by modulating dimerization dynamics, it may be possible to fine-tune CB 2 R activity, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes. [Display omitted] • A homobivalent ligand of CB 2 R (PM369) modulates the dynamics of receptor homodimerization. • PM369 binds to the orthosteric site of one protomer and to a complementary, membrane-facing, site of the other protomer. • PM369 triggers CB 2 R homodimerization via the TM 1/7 interface that provides unique pharmacological properties. • PM369 potentiates signaling, increases potency in G i binding and increases recruitment of β-arrestin. • These results disclose new approaches to modulating GPCR signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Two recently discovered DRD2 mutations, c.634A > T, p.Ile212Phe and c.1121T > G, p.Met374Arg, cause hyperkinetic movement disorders that have overlapping features but apparently differ in severity. The two known carriers of the Met374Arg variant had early childhood disease onset and more severe motor, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric deficits than any known carriers of the Ile212Phe variant, whose symptoms were first apparent in adolescence. Here, we evaluated if differences in the function of the two variants in cultured cells could explain differing pathogenicity. Both variants were expressed less abundantly than the wild type receptor and exhibited loss of agonist-induced arrestin binding, but differences in expression and arrestin binding between the variants were minor. Basal and agonist-induced activation of heterotrimeric G i/o/z proteins, however, showed clear differences; agonists were generally more potent at Met374Arg than at the Ile212Phe or wild type variants. Furthermore, all Gα subtypes tested were constitutively activated more by Met374Arg than by Ile212Phe. Met374Arg produced greater constitutive inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation than Ile212Phe or the wild type D2 receptor. Met374Arg and Ile212Phe were more sensitive to thermal inactivation than the wild type D2 receptor, as reported for other constitutively active receptors, but Ile212Phe was affected more than Met374Arg. Additional pharmacological characterization suggested that the mutations differentially affect the shape of the agonist binding pocket and the potency of dopamine, norepinephrine, and tyramine. Molecular dynamics simulations provided a structural rationale for enhanced constitutive activation and agonist potency. Enhanced constitutive and agonist-induced G protein-mediated signaling likely contributes to the pathogenicity of these novel variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a large and diverse class of signal-transducing receptors that undergo dynamic and isoform-specific membrane trafficking. GPCRs thus have an inherent potential to initiate or regulate signaling reactions from multiple membrane locations. This review discusses emerging insights into the subcellular organization of GPCR function in mammalian cells, focusing on signaling transduced by heterotrimeric G proteins and β-arrestins. We summarize recent evidence indicating that GPCR-mediated activation of G proteins occurs not only from the plasma membrane (PM) but also from endosomes and Golgi membranes and that β-arrestin-dependent signaling can be transduced from the PM by β-arrestin trafficking to clathrin-coated pits (CCPs) after dissociation from a ligand-activated GPCR.

Although general anesthesia is indispensable during modern surgical procedures, the mechanism by which inhalation anesthetics act on the synaptic membrane at the molecular and cellular level is largely unknown. In this study, we used yeast cells to examine the effect of isoflurane, an inhalation anesthetic, on membrane proteins. Bap2, an amino acid transporter localized on the plasma membrane, was endocytosed when yeast cells were treated with isoflurane. Depletion of RSP5, an E3 ligase, prevented this endocytosis and Bap2 was ubiquitinated in response to isoflurane, indicating an ubiquitin‐dependent process. Screening all the Rsp5 binding adaptors showed that Art2 plays a central role in this process. These results suggest that isoflurane affects Bap2 via an Art2‐Rsp5‐dependent ubiquitination system.

Biased G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands, which preferentially activate G protein or β-arrestin signaling pathways, are leading to the development of drugs with superior efficacy and reduced side effects in heart disease, pain management, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although GPCRs are implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), biased GPCR signaling is a largely unexplored area of investigation in AD. Our previous work demonstrated that GPR3-mediated β-arrestin signaling modulates amyloid-β (Aβ) generation in vitro and that Gpr3 deficiency ameliorates Aβ pathology in vivo. However, Gpr3-deficient mice display several adverse phenotypes, including elevated anxiety-like behavior, reduced fertility, and memory impairment, which are potentially associated with impaired G protein signaling. Here, we generated a G protein–biased GPR3 mouse model to investigate the physiological and pathophysiological consequences of selective elimination of GPR3-mediated β-arrestin signaling in vivo. In contrast to Gpr3-deficient mice, G protein–biased GPR3 mice do not display elevated anxiety levels, reduced fertility, or cognitive impairment. We further determined that G protein–biased signaling reduces soluble Aβ levels and leads to a decrease in the area and compaction of amyloid plaques in the preclinical AppNL-G-F AD mouse model. The changes in amyloid pathology are accompanied by robust microglial and astrocytic hypertrophy, which suggest a protective glial response that may limit amyloid plaque development in G protein–biased GPR3 AD mice. Collectively, these studies indicate that GPR3-mediated G protein and β-arrestin signaling produce discrete and separable effects and provide proof of concept for the development of safer GPCR-targeting therapeutics with more directed pharmacological action for AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resetting of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from their active state back to their biologically inert ground state is an integral part of GPCR signaling. This on-off GPCR cycle is regulated by reversible phosphorylation. Retinal rod and cone photoreceptors arguably represent the best-understood example of such GPCR signaling. Their visual pigments (opsins) are activated by light, transduce the signal, and are then inactivated by a GPCR kinase and arrestin. Although pigment inactivation by phosphorylation is well understood, the enzyme(s) responsible for pigment dephosphorylation and the functional significance of this reaction remain unknown. Here, we show that protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) acts as opsin phosphatase in both rods and cones. Elimination of PP2A substantially slows pigment dephosphorylation, visual chromophore recycling, and ultimately photoreceptor dark adaptation. These findings demonstrate that visual pigment dephosphorylation regulates the dark adaptation of photoreceptors and provide insights into the role of this reaction in GPCR signaling.

Muscarinic receptor agonists are characterized by apparently strict restraints on their tertiary or quaternary amine and their distance to an ester or related center. On the basis of the active state crystal structure of the muscarinic M2 receptor in complex with iperoxo, we explored potential agonists that lacked the highly conserved functionalities of previously known ligands. Using structure-guided pharmacophore design followed by docking, we found two agonists (compounds 3 and 17), out of 19 docked and synthesized compounds, that fit the receptor well and were predicted to form a hydrogen-bond conserved among known agonists. Structural optimization led to compound 28, which was 4-fold more potent than its parent 3. Fortified by the discovery of this new scaffold, we sought a broader range of chemotypes by docking 2.2 million fragments, which revealed another three micromolar agonists unrelated either to 28 or known muscarinics. Even pockets as tightly defined and as deeply studied as that of the muscarinic reveal opportunities for the structure-based design and the discovery of new chemotypes.