Search

Introduction: To evaluate the cost and efficiency of suture‐mediated percutaneous closure (SMC) compared to manual compression (MC) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. SMC has been demonstrated to be efficacious in reducing hemostasis and bedrest times after AF ablation. To date, randomized data comparing the direct and indirect cost between the two techniques have not been described. Methods: We conducted a 1:1 randomized trial comparing SMC to MC following AF ablation. The primary endpoints have been previously published. However, secondary endpoints pertinent to indirect cost including complication rates, hospital utilization (i.e., delays in discharge, additional patient encounters, nursing utilization), pain, patient reported outcomes, as well as the direct costs of care associated with AF ablation were collected. We also performed secondary analysis of the primary endpoint to evaluate for a learning curve, and subgroups analysis comparing efficacy across different numbers of access sites and compared to those in the MC group with a figure‐of‐eight suture (Fo8), that could potentially have impacted the relative efficiency of the procedure. Results: A total of 107 patients were randomized and included: 53 in the SMC group and 54 in MC. A learning curve was observed in the SMC group between the first and second half of the study group (p = 0.037), with no such difference in the MC group. After accounting for the number of access sites, time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC Group (p = 0.002). Compared to those in the Fo8 arm (n = 37), the time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC group (p = 0.001). Among those planned for same‐day discharge, there were more delays in the MC group (31.5% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.0144). Rates of major and minor complications were similar between SMC and MC groups at discharge (p = 0.243) and 30 days (p = 1.00), as were nursing utilization, self‐reported pain, and overall patient reported outcomes. The overall cost of care related to the procedure was similar between the MC and SMC groups ($56 533.65 [$45 699.47, $66 987.64] vs. $57 050.44 [$47 251.40, $66 426.34], p = 0.601). Conclusion: SMC has been shown to decrease time to hemostasis and ambulation and facilitate earlier same‐day discharge after AF ablation without an increase in direct or indirect costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is commonly seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pacemaker implantation among patients with SND and AF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Methods: The 2013–2022 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims database for commercially insured individuals in the United States (US), was used for this study. Patients with AF and SND and a history of at least one AAD prescription were identified and classified into CA or AAD cohorts based on subsequent treatment received. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the cohorts. Weighted Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the differential risk of incident permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Sub-analyses were performed by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent). Results: A total of 1206 patients in the AAD cohort and 1624 patients in the CA cohort were included. Study cohorts were well-balanced post-weighting. The incidence rate of PPM implantation (per 1000 person–year) was 55.8 for the CA cohort and 117.8 for the AAD cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CA cohort had 42% lower risk of incident PPM implantation than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46–0.72, p < 0.001). CA-treated patients had lower risks of PPM implantation versus AAD-treated patients among those with paroxysmal AF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34–0.69, p < 0.001) and persistent AF (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40–0.81, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Patients with AF and SND treated with CA have significantly lower risks of incident PPM implantation compared with those treated with an AAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Same day discharge (SDD) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure has emerged as routine practice, and primarily driven by operator discretion. However, the impacts of SDD on clinical outcomes, healthcare system costs, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) have not been systematically studied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures with SDD versus overnight observation (NSDD). After propensity adjustment we compared postprocedure adverse events (AEs), healthcare system costs, and changes in PROs. Results: We identified 310 cases, with 159 undergoing SDD and 151 staying at least one midnight in the hospital (NSDD). Compared with NSDD, SDD patients were similar age (mean 64 vs. 66, p = 0.3), sex (26% female vs. 27%, p = 0.8), and with lower mean CHADS2‐VA2Sc scores (2.0 vs. 2.7; p < 0.011). The primary outcome of AEs was noninferior in SDD versus NSDD patients (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21−0.99; noninferiority margin of 10%). There were also no differences in overall cost to the healthcare system between SDD and NSDD (p = 0.11). PROs numerically favored SDD (p = NS for all scores). Conclusions: Physician selection for SDD appears at least as safe as NSDD with respect to clinical outcomes and SDD is not significantly less costly to the health system. There is a trend towards more favorable, general PROs among SDD patients. Routine SDD should be strongly considered for patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The relationship between induction and recurrence due to atrial tachycardia (AT) and left atrial (LA) matrix progression after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Methods: One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation and achieved sinus rhythm before the procedure were classified into three groups according to the AT pattern induced after the procedure: group N (non-induced), F (focal pattern), and M (macroreentrant pattern) in 3D mapping. Results: The total rate of AT induction was 19.7% (30/152) in groups F (n = 13) and M (n = 17). Patients in group M were older than those in groups N and F, with higher CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc values, left atrial enlargement, and low-voltage area (LVA) size of LA. The receiver operating characteristic curve determined that the cut-off LVA for macroreentrant AT induction was 8.8 cm2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–0.97). The recurrence of AT at 36 months in group N was 4.1% (5/122), and at the second ablation, all patients had macroreentrant AT. Patients with AT recurrence in group N had a wide LVA at the first ablation, and the cut-off LVA for AT recurrence was 6.5 cm2 (AUC 0.94, 95%CI 0.88–0.99). Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that only LVA size was associated with the recurrence of macroreentrant AT (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04–1.51). Conclusions: It is important to develop a therapeutic strategy based on the LVA size to suppress the recurrence of AT in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to share our methods and experience of persistent AF ablation without a circular mapping catheter (CMC), thereby avoiding femoral venous and transseptal punctures, decreasing the cost of the procedure, and possibly reducing the duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy time. Methods: We report our experience with 261 persistent AF ablations performed without a CMC over the past 3 years. Results: The procedures were performed with no apparent loss of efficacy or safety. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL) episodes >30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. At 1 year, 72% of the patients were free from arrythmias. Conclusions: Persistent AF ablation is feasible without a CMC, reducing the need for venous and transseptal punctures and the cost of the procedure. We suggest that prospective studies should aim to characterise the reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy times as a result of this technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 70-year-old man with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent transcatheter radiofrequency ablation after an earlier unsuccessful attempt. Although typical AF triggers were ablated, the patient's condition persisted, leading to the identification of the interatrial septum (IAS) as the probable source of the tachycardia trigger. Given the depth and thickness of the IAS, traditional radiofrequency ablation proved ineffective. However, using the alternative method of bipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation (B-RFCA), the atrial tachycardia was successfully terminated. B-RFCA demonstrates potential for effectively terminating tachycardias originating from deep intramural locations, suggesting its potential as a pivotal technique for complex cases with septal atrial tachycardia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Little is known about very early atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation after first AF detection. Methods: We evaluated patients with AF ablation <4 months from newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF (NEWPaAF) and newly diagnosed persistent AF (NEWPeAF). We compared the two patient populations and compared ablation outcomes to those undergoing later ablation. Results: Ablation was done <4 months from AF diagnosis in 353 patients (135 = paroxysmal, 218 = persistent). Early ablation outcome was best for NEWPaAF versus NEWPeAF for initial (p = 0.030) but not final (p = 0.102) ablation. Despite recent AF diagnosis in both groups, they were clinically quite different. NEWPaAF patients were younger (64.3 ± 13.0 vs. 67.3 ± 10.9, p = 0.0020), failed fewer drugs (0.39 vs. 0.60, p = 0.007), had smaller LA size (4.12 ± 0.58 vs. 4.48 ± 0.59 cm, p < 0.0001), lower BMI (28.8 ± 5.0 vs. 30.3 ± 6.0, p = 0.016), and less CAD (3.7% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.007), cardiomyopathies (2.2% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.0001), hypertension (46.7% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.0001), diabetes (8.1% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011) and sleep apnea (20.0% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.031). For NEWPaAF, early ablation AF‐free outcome was no better than later ablation (p = 0.314). For NEWPeAF, AF‐free outcomes were better for early ablation than later ablation (p < 0.0001). Delaying ablation allowed more strokes/TIAs in both AF types (paroxysmal p = 0.014, persistent p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients presenting for early ablation after newly diagnosed persistent AF have more pre‐existing comorbidities and worse initial ablation outcomes than patients with NEWPaAF. For NEWPaAF, there was no advantage to early ablation, as long as the AF remained paroxysmal. For NEWPeAF, early ablation gave better outcomes than later ablation and they should undergo early ablation. For both AF types, waiting was associated with more neurologic events, suggesting all patients should consider earlier ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter is feasible in patients with deep brain stimulation but with extreme caution given the possibility of life‐threatening complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: During atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA), achievement of first pass isolation (FPI) reflects effective lesion formation and predicts long‐term freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. We aim to determine the clinical and procedural predictors of pulmonary vein FPI. Methods: We reviewed AFA procedures in a multicenter prospective registry of AFA (REAL‐AF). A multivariate ordinal logistic regression, weighted by inverse proceduralist volume, was used to determine predictors of FPI. Results: A total of 2671 patients were included with 1806 achieving FPI in both vein sides, 702 achieving FPI in one, and 163 having no FPI. Individually, age, left atrial (LA) scar, higher power usage (50 W), greater posterior contact force, ablation index >350 posteriorly, Vizigo™ sheath utilization, nonstandard ventilation, and high operator volume (>6 monthly cases) were all related to improved odds of FPI. Conversely sleep apnea, elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, LA enlargement, antiarrhythmic drug use, and center's higher fluoroscopy use were related to reduced odds of FPI. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI > 30 (OR 0.78 [0.64–0.96]) and LA volume (OR per mL increase = 1.00 [0.99–1.00]) predicted lower odds of achieving FPI, whereas significant left atrial scarring (>20%) was related to higher rates of FPI. Procedurally, the use of high power (50 W) (OR 1.32 [1.05–1.65]), increasing force posteriorly (OR 2.03 [1.19–3.46]), and nonstandard ventilation (OR 1.26 [1.00–1.59]) predicted higher FPI rates. At a site level, high procedural volume (OR 1.89 [1.48–2.41]) and low fluoroscopy centers (OR 0.72 [0.61–0.84]) had higher rates of FPI. Conclusion: FPI rates are affected by operator experience, patient comorbidities, and procedural strategies. These factors may be postulated to impact acute lesion formation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), as the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, has emerged a widely used therapy for patients suffering from AF. To improve PVI efficiency, single-shot catheters (SSCs) have been developed. Regrettably, SSCs are not integrated into 3D-mapping technology. In that regard, a novel radiofrequency balloon catheter (RFBC, Heliostar, Biosense Webster) with full integration into 3D-mapping technology has been developed. The aim of this study was to assess operative and follow-up outcomes of the RFBC in AF patients. In this monocentric prospective registry, patients with a first-time PVI using the RFBC were included. Follow-up visits were scheduled 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after ablation and in case of symptoms. A total of 171 patients (36.8% female) were included, with a mean age of 68.5 ± 10.2 years. Among them, 63 patients (36.8%) presented with persistent AF. Notably, no major periprocedural complications were observed. The mean follow-up period was 287 ± 157 days. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the estimated recurrence-free survival after 12 months was 81.8%. Based on our data, PVI with the fully 3D-mapping-integrated RFBC seems to be safe and effective and to have a favorable 12-month outcome in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are common overlapping cardiovascular disorders. Despite important therapeutic advances over the past several decades, controversy persists about whether a rate control or rhythm control approach constitutes the best option in this population. There is also considerable debate about whether antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation is the best approach when rhythm control is pursued. A brief historical examination of the literature addressing this issue will be performed. An analysis of several important clinical outcomes observed in the prospective, randomized studies, which have compared AF ablation to non‐ablation treatment options, will be discussed. This review will conclude with recommendations to guide clinicians on the status of AF ablation as a treatment option when considering management options in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter is feasible in patients with deep brain stimulation but with extreme caution given the possibility of life‐threatening complications.

New ablation catheters have continuously developed to improve the safety and efficacy of ablation procedures. The TactiFlex Ablation Catheter Sensor Enabled (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN) is a novel open‐irrigation radiofrequency ablation catheter that has contact force‐sensing technology and flexible tip, allowing real‐time contact force assessment with directionality. This case report reported a loss of contact force vector and directionality with the TactiFlex SE ablation catheter during de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The TactiFlex™ ablation catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA), is an open-irrigation radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with flexible tip technology. This catheter delivers high-power short-duration (HPSD) RF ablations and has been adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. HPSD is well-established not only in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) but also when targeting extra-pulmonary vein (PV) targets. This study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of PVI plus posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF) using HPSD and the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent the ablation of Pe-AF in our centre between February 2023 and February 2024 were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PVI plus PWI using TactiFlex™ and the HPSD strategy. The RF parameters were 50 W on all the PV segments and the roof, and within the posterior wall (PW). Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and the high-density multipolar Advisor HD Grid, Sensor Enabled™ mapping catheter. We compared the procedural data using HPSD with TactiFlex™ (n = 52) vs. a historical cohort of patients who underwent PVI plus PWI using HPSD settings and the TactiCath ablation catheter (n = 84). Results: Fifty-two consecutive patients were included in the study. PVI and PWI were achieved in all patients in the TactiFlex™ group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 97.9% of PVs (n = 195/199). PWI was obtained in all cases by delivering extensive RF lesions within the PW. There were no significant differences compared to the TactiCath group: first-pass PVI was achieved in 96.3% of PVs (n = 319/331). Adenosine administration revealed PV reconnection in 5.7% of patients, and two reconnections of the PW were documented. Procedure and RF time were significantly shorter in the TactiFlex™ group compared to the TactiCath group, 73.1 ± 12.6 vs. 98.5 ± 16.3 min, and 11.3 ± 1.5 vs. 23.5 ± 3.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No intraprocedural and periprocedural complications related to the ablation catheter were observed. Patients had an implantable loop recorder before discharge. At the 6-month follow-up, 76.8% of patients remained free from atrial arrhythmia, with no significant differences between groups. Conclusions: HPSD PVI plus PWI using the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter is effective and safe. Compared to a control group, the use of TactiFlex™ to perform HPSD PVI plus PWI is associated with a similar effectiveness but with a significantly shorter procedural and RF time.

Background: The newly introduced nonthermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology to achieve fast pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with high acute success rates and good safety features. However, previous studies have shown that very high power short duration ablation (VHPSD) is also highly effective and fast to achieve PVI with potentially less arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Data comparing PFA to VHPSD‐PVI is lacking. Objective: This study compared procedural and outcome data for PFA‐PVI to VHPSD‐PVI in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF/persAF). Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (PFA or VHPSD) were included in this analysis. For PFA‐PVI a pentaspline 20 electrode catheter was used. For VHPSD‐PVI an enhanced irrigated catheter with a power setting of 70 W/7 s (70 W/5 s at posterior wall) was employed in conjunction with electro‐anatomical mapping. All procedures were performed in deep analgo‐sedation. Results: A total of n = 114 patients (n = 57[50%] PFA, n = 17[30%] PAF; n = 40[70%] persAF) were included in this analysis. PVI was successful in all patients. The PFA group revealed a significantly shorter procedure duration (65 ± 17 min vs. 95 ± 23 min, p < 0.01) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA 15 ± 5 min and VHPSD 12 ± 3 min; p < 0.001). At follow‐up after median 125 days (interquartile range: 109–162) n = 46 PFA (80.7%) and n = 44 VHPSD pts (77.2%) were free from atrial arrhythmia after a single procedure (p = 0.819). Two tamponades occurred in the PFA while in VHPSD two pts suffered groin bleedings. One clinically nonsignificant PV stenosis occurred in the VHPSD group. Conclusion: Pulsed‐field ablation and VHPSD‐PVI seem to be highly effective and safe to achieve PVI in the setting of PAF and persAF with comparable arrhythmia‐free survival. However, procedure duration for PFA PVI is significantly shorter and therefore may be of potential benefit. Compared to PFA VHPSD‐PVI might ensure information on left atrial substrate allowing to target concomitant secondary tachycardias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to develop a hemostatic device with physiological evidence that allows ambulation soon after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We measured right femoral vein pressure in 57 participants to clarify why groin post-venipuncture rebleeding often occurs during the transition from supine to sitting under compression bandage application and found that it increased more than threefold when raising the upper body (8.6 ± 4.1 to 27.6 ± 6.9 mmHg; P < 0.001). Based on that data, we created a novel hemostatic belt. Its capability test including 25 participants demonstrated that the belt gave much higher compression pressures on the right groin while sitting than the compression bandage (59.5 ± 14.9 vs. 8.1 ± 4 mmHg; P < 0.001), achieving pressures above the maximum femoral vein pressure in 92% of participants. A randomized trial comparing the belt with compression bandage in 74 AF patients demonstrated that the belt reduced time to ambulation without any rebleeding (340 [92.5–360] vs. 360 [360–360] min; P < 0.001) and satisfied more patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of an enlarged left atrium (LA) in mitral valve (MV) disease with atrial fibrillation (AF) is still being debated. It has been postulated that a reduction in LA size may improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess rhythm and clinical outcomes of combined surgical AF treatment with or without LA volume reduction (LAVR) in patients undergoing MV surgery. A systematic review was performed and all available literature to May 2022 was included. The primary endpoint was analysis of early and late mortality and rhythm outcomes. Secondary outcomes included early and late cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and permanent pacemaker implantation. The search strategy yielded 2,808 potentially relevant articles, and 19 papers were eventually included. The pooled estimated rate of 30-day mortality was 3.76% (95% CI 2.52–5.56). The incidence rate of late mortality and late cardiac-related mortality was 1.75%/year (95% CI 0.63–4.84) and 1.04%/year (95% CI 0.31–3.53), respectively. At subgroup analysis when comparing the surgical procedure with and without AF ablation, the ablation subgroup showed a significantly lower rate of postoperative CVA (p<0.0001) and higher restoration to sinus rhythm at discharge (p=0.0124), with only a trend of lower AF recurrence at 1 year (p=0.0608). At univariable meta-regression, reintervention was significantly associated with higher late mortality (p=0.0033). In enlarged LA undergoing MV surgery, LAVR combined with AF ablation showed a trend of improved rhythm outcomes when compared with AF ablation without LAVR. Each LAVR technique has its advantages and disadvantages, which must be managed accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is being increasingly performed without fluoroscopy. This study aims to determine the safety of fluoroless RFA for patients with pre‐existing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Methods: This is a single‐center, single‐operator, retrospective, observational study of 225 consecutive fluoroless RFA procedures for AF from June 1, 2019 to June 1, 2022. All procedures were performed with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) support. Patients with pre‐existing CIED were extracted from the database. Each CIED was interrogated at the start and end of each procedure and at 30‐day follow‐up. Pre‐ and post‐procedure CIED interrogations were compared for any change in device or lead parameters. Patients were tracked for any subsequent device malfunction. Results: Out of 225 fluoroless AF ablations, 25 (10.2%) had pre‐existing CIED (14 dual‐chamber pacemakers, three dual‐chamber defibrillators, three single‐chamber defibrillators, one single chamber pacemaker, and four biventricular devices). Mean patient age was 71 ± 6 years. The mean duration of indwelling CIED was 1804 ± 1645 days (range: 78–6267 days). One (4%) patient had lead‐related fibrin on ICE imaging. There was no significant difference in lead(s) threshold, impedance, or sensing post procedure or at 30‐day follow‐up compared to pre procedure. None of the patients required lead revision. There were no intra‐ or post‐op thromboembolic events or subsequent device infection. One patient underwent CIED extraction after 11 months for an unrelated secondary device infection. Conclusions: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF can be safely performed without fluoroscopy in patients with pre‐existing CIED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib). Objectives: We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included. Results: Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%; P = 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (P = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (P = 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). PVI using cryoballoon (CB) technology has emerged as a standard procedure in many centers. Recently, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been introduced and used to achieve PVI. First data show high acute and favorable long‐term outcomes. So far, data comparing these new "single shot" devices are sparse. We sought to compare procedural and outcome data for first time PFA users versus CB in patients undergoing de novo PVI. Furthermore, potentially postprocedural discomfort and affection of autonomic ganglia were assessed. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis and comparison of all de novo PVIs with PFA and CB was performed. Furthermore, PFA PVI learning curve was evaluated. During follow‐up, repeat outpatient visits and Holter electrocardiogram were performed to analyze arrhythmia‐free survival. Discomfort analysis was obtained by prescribed analgesic medication within first 48 h after PVI. Potential changes in heart rate (HR) between baseline and at 3‐month follow‐up were evaluated. A total of 108 patients (54 PFA and 54 CB; PFA; 33 (30%) female) with paroxysmal and persistent AF were analyzed. Type of AF was comparable (Patients suffering from PAF: PFA: 16 (30%), CB: 17 (31%), p = 1.0). In 107 (99%) patients, successful PVI was achieved. Transient phrenic palsy omitted complete PVI in one CB patient. A trend for a shorter overall procedure duration was observed in the PFA group (PFA: 64.5 ± 17.5 min; CB: 73.0 ± 24.8 min; p = 0.07). Excluding LA mapping time (first 14 cases), procedure time was significantly shorter using PFA (PFA: 58.0 ± 12.5 min, CB: 73.0 ± 24.8 min, p = 0.0001). Fluoroscopy time was significantly longer for PFA (PFA: 15.3 ± 4.7 min, CB: 12.3 ± 5.3 min; p = 0.001), but significantly less contrast medium was used (PFA: 12 ± 6 mL; CB: 51 ± 29 mL, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the PFA group revealed a significant shortening of procedure duration over time (first tertile: 72.7 ± 13.5 min, second tertile: 67.3 ± 21.7 min, third tertile: 53.4 ± 9.8 min, first vs. third tertile p < 0.0001). Two cardiac tamponades occurred in the PFA group (p = 0.495), of which one was most likely related to complex transseptal puncture. In the first 48 h after PVI, the number of prescribed analgesics due to postprocedural pain was equal between both groups (PFA: 7 (13%) patients, CB: 10 (19%) patients, p = 0.598). After a FU of 273 ± 129 days, 35 of 47 patients (74%) after PFA and 36 of 50 patients (72%) after CB PVI were free of any atrial arrhythmia (HR: 0.98, p = 0.88). Only in the PFA group, a significant increase in HR 3 months after PVI was observed (pre‐PVI: 61 ± 8 beats/min, post‐PVI: 65 ± 9 beats/min, p = 0.008). Conclusion: The new PFA technology is equally effective and safe as compared to CB for complete PVI with potentially shorter procedure time and significantly less contrast medium. However, AF recurrence rates after PFA PVI seem to be comparable to CB PVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, there has been increased focus on the development of safe and effective strategies to minimize and ultimately eliminate fluoroscopy use in the electrophysiology lab due to the inherent risks to patients and staff associated with this imaging source. However, studies examining these innovative fluoroless strategies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using catheters without direct 3D mapping system integration are lacking. We sought to develop a method to perform zero-fluoroscopy laser balloon PVI for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to test the safety and efficacy of this approach. Methods: We developed a standardized method for performing PVI using the X3 laser balloon (LB) system, 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in a cohort of patients with symptomatic AF. The primary endpoint of the study was the ability to perform PVI without the use of fluoroscopy. Secondary outcomes were rate of successful transseptal puncture on first attempt, first pass isolation of target PVs, mean procedural time, active laser time to achieve PVI, need for use of supplemental energy sources, and procedural complication rates. Results: Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing PVI were recruited in the study. In the zero-fluoroscopy group, LB PVI was successfully performed in 100% of participants (n = 100) without the need for fluoroscopy. Transseptal access was achieved in 100% of cases on the first attempt. Successful first pass PVI was achieved in 360 of the 387 pulmonary veins attempted (93%). Mean procedural time was 68.2 ± 16.2 min in the zero-fluoroscopy group versus 67.5 ± 17.0 min in the conventional fluoroscopy group. PVI was able to be achieved in 100% of cases in both groups without need for use of supplemental energy sources. In the zero-fluoroscopy group there were minimal complications, with 3% of all cases having groin complications and 1 patient with a pericardial effusion noted post-procedure which was managed conservatively. Conclusions: We demonstrated that successful zero-fluoroscopy LB PVI could be performed at a single high-volume center by experienced operators in an effective manner, without significant complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the main cause of cardioembolic stroke. In high-bleeding-risk patients, long-life anticoagulation therapy is not permitted, and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure may be considered. LAA is also a critical substrate for AF. Epicardial LAA occlusion has several advantages: LAA ligation results in a favorable electrical and structural atrial remodeling, which decreases AF recurrence. Endocardial ablation alone is not efficient for all patients, and new evidence shows better outcomes in patients affected by persistent AF after a combined hybrid endo-epicardial ablation. Considering the synergic potential of these techniques, in this case series, they were both combined in a single procedure.Methods and resultsWe describe the treatment of 5 patients referred for refractory AF ablation and LAA closure. All patients had high thrombotic and previous major hemorrhage, with relative contraindication to life-long therapy with anticoagulation. A combined procedure of LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was scheduled with short-term anticoagulation. LAA closure was performed with an epicardial approach using the LARIAT system. Then, LA mapping and ablation were performed, endocardially and then epicardially.All procedures were concluded without complications.At follow-up, in all patients, transesophageal echocardiography showed the complete occlusion of the LAA; therefore, anticoagulation therapy was interrupted. All patients were asymptomatic, and in the sinus rhythm, no hemorrhage or ischemic events occurred.ConclusionThe combination of percutaneous LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was revealed to be feasible and safe and might represent a new approach for the treatment of refractory AF in patients with indication of LAA occlusion.

There is an extraordinary and increasing global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), two conditions that frequently accompany one another and that share underlying risk factors. Whether a causal pathophysiologic relationship connects OSA to the development and/or progression of AF, or whether shared risk factors promote both conditions, is unproven. With increasing recognition of the importance of controlling AF-related risk factors, numerous observational studies now highlight the potential benefits of OSA treatment in AF-related outcomes. Physicians are regularly faced with caring for this important and increasing population of patients despite a paucity of clinical guidance on the topic. Here, we review the clinical epidemiology and pathophysiology of AF and OSA with a focus on key clinical studies and major outstanding questions that should be addressed in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been adopted to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although the role of HPSD is well-established in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), fewer data have assessed the impact of HPSD when addressing extra-pulmonary veins (PVs) targets. Therefore, this study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of HPSD lesion index (LSI)-guided posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to PVI as an initial strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ablation of Pe-AF in our center between August 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients' ablation strategy was PVI plus PWI using HPSD LSI-guided isolation. RF parameters included 50 W targeting LSI values of ≥5 on the anterior part of the PVs and anterior roofline and ≥4 for the posterior PVs aspect, bottom line, and within the posterior wall (PW). We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PWI. Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and a high-density multipolar Grid-shaped mapping catheter. We compared the procedural characteristics using HPSD (n = 35) vs. a control group (n = 46). Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. PWI on top of PVI was achieved in all cases in the HPSD group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 93.3% of PVs (n = 126/135). First-pass roofline block was obtained in most patients (n = 31, 88.5%), while first-pass block of the bottom line was only achieved in 51.4% (n = 18). There were no significant differences compared to the control group; first-pass PVI was achieved in 94.9% of PVs (n = 169/178), first-pass roofline block in 89.1%, and bottom-line in 45.6% of patients. To achieve complete PWI with HPSD, scattered RF applications within the PW were necessary. No electrical reconnection of the PW was found after adenosine administration and the waiting period. The procedure and RF times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the control group, with values of 116.2 ± 10.9 vs. 144.5 ± 11.3 min, and 19.8 ± 3.6 vs. 26.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively, p < 0.001. Fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No procedural complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 71.4% of patients remained free from AF, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: HPSD LSI-guided PWI on top of PVI seems effective and safe. Compared to a control group, HPSD is associated with similar rates of first-pass PWI and PVI but with a shorter procedural and RF time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is an increasingly used ablation strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures, but Lesion Index (LSI)-guided HPSD radiofrequency (RF) applications have not been described in this clinical setting. We evaluated the procedural efficiency and safety of an LSI-guided HPSD strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Paroxysmal and persistent AF patients scheduled for AF ablation were prospectively enrolled and divided into two groups, according to the ablation power used (≥45 W for the LSI-HP Group and ≤40 W for the LSI-LP group). All patients underwent only PVI LSI-guided ablation (5.5 to 6 anteriorly; 5 to 5.5 superiorly, 4.5 to 5 posteriorly) with a point-by-point strategy and an inter-lesion distance <6 mm. Forty-six patients with AF (25 in the LSI-HP Group vs 21 in the LSI-LP Group)—59% paroxysmal, 78% male, with low-intermediate CHA2DS2-Vasc scores (2 [1–3]), a preserved ejection fraction (65 ± 6%) and a mean left atrial index volume of 39 ± 13 mL/m2 were prospectively enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. PVI was successful in all patients. The RF time (29 (23–37) vs. 49 (41–53) min, p < 0.001), total procedure time (131 (126–145) vs. 155 (139–203) min, p = 0.007) and fluoroscopy time (12 (10–18) vs. 21 (16–26) min, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the LSI-HP Group. No complications or steam pops were seen in either group. LSI-HP AF ablation significantly improved procedural efficiency—reducing ablation time, total procedural duration, and fluoroscopy use, while maintaining a comparable safety profile to lower-power procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion Statement: Patients with cancer are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) including atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Advances in percutaneous catheter-based treatments, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AHD, percutaneous valve replacement or repair for VHD, and ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAODs) for AF, have provided patients with CVD significant benefit in the recent decades. However, trials and registries investigating outcomes of these procedures often exclude patients with cancer. As a result, patients with cancer are less likely to undergo these therapies despite their benefits. Despite the inclusion of cancer patients in randomized clinical trial data, studies suggest that cancer patients derive similar benefits of percutaneous therapies for CVD compared with patients without cancer. Therefore, percutaneous interventions for CVD should not be withheld in patients with cancer, as they may still benefit from these procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The common practice after atrial fibrillation ablation is to admit patients for an overnight stay. The aim of this study was to compare a strategy of vascular suture mediated closure system utilization and early discharge (strategy A) compared to traditional closure and overnight hospitalization (strategy B) regarding feasibility, safety, quality of life and health care cost effectiveness. Methods and Results: Hundred patients were randomized to compare both strategies. No clinical differences were reported except diabetes mellitus. Six patients (6%) had and emergency visit or were admitted in the first 30 days after procedure. Three occurred in strategy A versus three in strategy B (p = 1) (p <.005 for non‐inferiority). Forty out of 50 patients (80%) were safely discharged in a time frame of 3 h and 42 patients (84%) were discharged in the same day of the procedure in strategy A. Time to discharge was shorter in strategy A compared to strategy B. (5.89 ± 7.47 h vs. 27.09 ± 2.29 p <.005). No differences were obtained in quality‐of‐life outcomes. Mean (95% CI) euros cost saving per patient in strategy A was 379.16 ± 93.55 p <.001. Ten acute complications (10% patients CI 95% 4.02%–15.98%) were reported during the trial. Seven (14% CI 95% 4.04%–23.96%) occurred in strategy A patients versus 3 (6% CI 95% 0.8%–12.8%) in strategy B. (p =.182) Conclusion: A strategy of vascular suture mediated closure system utilization and early discharge was feasible, reduced time to discharge, saved costs and was not associated with more complications or admissions/emergency visits in a 30‐day time frame after procedure compared to a strategy of regular admission and discharge after overnight stay. There were no differences regarding quality‐of‐life parameters between both strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Common atrium (CA), also called three‐chambered heart, is one of the rare congenital anomalies, defined by a complete absence of the atrial septum, eventually associated with malformation of the atrioventricular (AV) valves. We report the case of a 57‐year‐old woman with CA complicated with Eisenmenger syndrome and inferior vena cava interruption, who suffered from symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). She underwent an initial successful pulmonary vein isolation procedure. A repeat procedure for perivalvular atrial flutter was complicated with inadvertent complete AV block, due to unusual AV node location in this challenging anatomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: General anaesthesia (GA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often preferred over conscious sedation (CS) to minimize patient discomfort and reduce the risk of map disruption from patient movement but may pose an additional risk to some patients with significant comorbidity or poor cardiac function. Methods: We extracted data for 300 patients who underwent AF ablation between the years 2017 and 2019 and compared the outcomes of AF ablation with CS and GA. Results: Compared to the GA group, patients were younger in the CS group (63 versus 66 years, p = 0.02), had less persistent AF (34% versus 46%, p = 0.048) and the left atrial dimension was smaller (41 versus 45 mm, p = 0.01). More patients had cryoballoon ablation (CBA) than radiofrequency (RFA) ablation in the CS than the GA group (88% CB with CS and 56% RF with GA, p

Abstract Background The hybrid approach has become the most effective treatment option for restoring sinus rhythm and reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, several issues remain to be clearly defined, including the appropriate timing of the staged procedure and the most effective strategy. Methods Over a 12-year period of activity, we performed 609 AF ablation procedures via a right mini-thoracotomy. From this general population, 60 patients underwent a hybrid procedure with catheter ablation performed at least 4 weeks after the surgical procedure to confirm if effective complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved. In 20 patients, the second stage procedure was performed during the same hospitalization due to patient’s electrical instability. The results obtained in immediate versus staged patients were compared. Results All patients were discharged after the first stage procedure in sinus rhythm. The 20 immediate patients had a shorter hospital stay compared with the staged patients, in whom the two hospitalizations resulted in a longer hospital stay (immediate 5.5 ± 1.6 days versus staged 8.7 ± 1.4, P

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) can arise from several etiologies, including congenital, acquired, and iatrogenic sources. PVS presents insidiously, leading to significant delays in diagnosis. A high index of suspicion and dedicated noninvasive evaluation are key to diagnosis. Once diagnosed, both noninvasive and invasive evaluation may afford further insights into the relative contribution of PVS to symptoms. Treatment of underlying reversible pathologies coupled with transcatheter balloon angioplasty and stenting for persistent severe stenoses are established approaches. Ongoing refinements in diagnostic modalities, interventional approaches, postintervention monitoring, and medical therapies hold promise to further improve patient outcomes. [Display omitted] • PVS has various etiologies, and symptoms may overlap those of other conditions. • It is important to manage reversible underlying etiologies of PVS. • Transcatheter interventions may improve symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients with PVS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is achievable and effective using radiofrequency (RF) catheter (CA) or cryoballoon (CB) ablation. The newly introduced high RF-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) technique has shown promising results. Data comparing HPSD- to CB-PVI is sparse. We sought to investigate success rates and procedural differences of HPSD-PVI vs. CB-PVI in patients undergoing ablation for PAF and persAF. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (HPSD or CB) were included. A power setting of 70W/7 s (70W/5 s at posterior wall) using a flexible tip catheter with enhanced irrigation was considered as true HPSD. Follow-up consisted of out-clinic pts visits, tele-consultation, 48-h Holter ECG, app-based telemonitoring and cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) interrogation. Results: 721 patients (46 HPSD, 675 CB) were analyzed. In all HPSD (27 persAF [59%]) and CB patients (423 persAF [63%]), PVI was successfully achieved. Procedure duration was significantly longer for HPSD (91 ± 19 min vs. 72 ± 18 min, p < 0.01). Ablation time was similar in both groups (HPSD: 44 ± 19 min vs. CB: 40 ± 17 min; p = 0.347). No major complications occurred in HPSD. For CB-PVI, in 25 (3.7%; p = 0.296) patients, complications occurred. At a follow-up of 290 ± 135 days, arrhythmia-free survival using HPSD was non-inferior to CB-PVI in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (p = 0.096). Conclusion: PVI using HPSD is equally effective and safe to CB-PVI. This analysis revealed a similar arrhythmia-free survival after HPSD and CB with low complication rates. Procedure duration for CB was significantly shorter while LA dwell time excluding mapping was equal. Currently, a prospective trial is conducted to corroborate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]