Search

Long-term home monitoring of people living with epilepsy cannot be achieved using the standard full-scalp electroencephalography (EEG) coupled with video. Wearable seizure detection devices, such as behind-the-ear EEG (bte-EEG), offer an unobtrusive method for ambulatory follow-up of this population. Combining bte-EEG with electrocardiography (ECG) can enhance automated seizure detection performance. However, such frameworks produce high false alarm rates, making visual review necessary. This study aimed to evaluate a semi-automated multimodal wearable seizure detection framework using bte-EEG and ECG. Using the SeizeIT1 dataset of 42 patients with focal epilepsy, an automated multimodal seizure detection algorithm was used to produce seizure alarms. Two reviewers evaluated the algorithm's detections twice: (1) using only bte-EEG data and (2) using bte-EEG, ECG, and heart rate signals. The readers achieved a mean sensitivity of 59.1% in the bte-EEG visual experiment, with a false detection rate of 6.5 false detections per day. Adding ECG resulted in a higher mean sensitivity (62.2%) and a largely reduced false detection rate (mean of 2.4 false detections per day), as well as an increased inter-rater agreement. The multimodal framework allows for efficient review time, making it beneficial for both clinicians and patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term home monitoring of people living with epilepsy cannot be achieved using the standard full-scalp electroencephalography (EEG) coupled with video. Wearable seizure detection devices, such as behind-the-ear EEG (bte-EEG), offer an unobtrusive method for ambulatory follow-up of this population. Combining bte-EEG with electrocardiography (ECG) can enhance automated seizure detection performance. However, such frameworks produce high false alarm rates, making visual review necessary. This study aimed to evaluate a semi-automated multimodal wearable seizure detection framework using bte-EEG and ECG. Using the SeizeIT1 dataset of 42 patients with focal epilepsy, an automated multimodal seizure detection algorithm was used to produce seizure alarms. Two reviewers evaluated the algorithm’s detections twice: (1) using only bte-EEG data and (2) using bte-EEG, ECG, and heart rate signals. The readers achieved a mean sensitivity of 59.1% in the bte-EEG visual experiment, with a false detection rate of 6.5 false detections per day. Adding ECG resulted in a higher mean sensitivity (62.2%) and a largely reduced false detection rate (mean of 2.4 false detections per day), as well as an increased inter-rater agreement. The multimodal framework allows for efficient review time, making it beneficial for both clinicians and patients.

Objective: Wearable seizure detection devices could provide more reliable seizure documentation outside the hospital compared to seizure self‐reporting by patients, which is the current standard. Previously, during the SeizeIT1 project, we studied seizure detection based on behind‐the‐ear electroencephalography (EEG). However, the obtained sensitivities were too low for practical use, because not all seizures are associated with typical ictal EEG patterns. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to develop a multimodal automated seizure detection algorithm integrating behind‐the‐ear EEG and electrocardiography (ECG) for detecting focal seizures. In this framework, we quantified the added value of ECG to behind‐the‐ear EEG. Methods: This study analyzed three multicenter databases consisting of 135 patients having focal epilepsy and a total of 896 seizures. A patient‐specific multimodal automated seizure detection algorithm was developed using behind‐the‐ear/temporal EEG and single‐lead ECG. The EEG and ECG data were processed separately using machine learning methods. A late integration approach was applied for fusing those predictions. Results: The multimodal algorithm outperformed the EEG‐based algorithm in two of three databases, with an increase of 11% and 8% in sensitivity for the same false alarm rate. Significance: ECG can be of added value to an EEG‐based seizure detection algorithm using only behind‐the‐ear/temporal lobe electrodes for patients with focal epilepsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Seizure diaries kept by patients are unreliable. Automated electroencephalography (EEG)‐based seizure detection systems are a useful support tool to objectively detect and register seizures during long‐term video‐EEG recording. However, this standard full scalp‐EEG recording setup is of limited use outside the hospital, and a discreet, wearable device is needed for capturing seizures in the home setting. We are developing a wearable device that records EEG with behind‐the‐ear electrodes. In this study, we determined whether the recognition of ictal patterns using only behind‐the‐ear EEG channels is possible. Second, an automated seizure detection algorithm was developed using only those behind‐the‐ear EEG channels. Methods: Fifty‐four patients with a total of 182 seizures, mostly temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 5284 hours of data, were recorded with a standard video‐EEG at University Hospital Leuven. In addition, extra behind‐the‐ear EEG channels were recorded. First, a neurologist was asked to annotate behind‐the‐ear EEG segments containing selected seizure and nonseizure fragments. Second, a data‐driven algorithm was developed using only behind‐the‐ear EEG. This algorithm was trained using data from other patients (patient‐independent model) or from the same patient (patient‐specific model). Results: The visual recognition study resulted in 65.7% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity. By using those seizure annotations, the automated algorithm obtained 64.1% sensitivity and 2.8 false‐positive detections (FPs)/24 hours with the patient‐independent model. The patient‐specific model achieved 69.1% sensitivity and 0.49 FPs/24 hours. Significance: Visual recognition of ictal EEG patterns using only behind‐the‐ear EEG is possible in a significant number of patients with TLE. A patient‐specific seizure detection algorithm using only behind‐the‐ear EEG was able to detect more seizures automatically than what patients typically report, with 0.49 FPs/24 hours. We conclude that a large number of refractory TLE patients can benefit from using this device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Semi-supervised approach via anomaly detecting variational autoencoder for seizure detection with a behind-the-ear electroencephalogram. • Proposed algorithm was developed and clinically evaluated with more than 500 h of behind-the-ear EEG data from 16 epilepsy patients. • Developed algorithm achieved detection performance with a sensitivity of 94.2% with a false alarm rate of 0.29 per hour on average for cross-validation. • This study also confirmed the distinguishability of the network's inference in terms of the EEG frequency bands and visualization of their latent representations. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic diseases worldwide, and 30% of the patients live with uncontrolled seizures. For the safety of patients with epilepsy, an automatic seizure detection algorithm for continuous seizure monitoring in daily life is important to reduce risks related to seizures, including sudden unexpected death. Previous researchers applied machine learning to detect seizures with EEG, but the epileptic EEG waveform contains subtle changes that are difficult to identify. Furthermore, the imbalance problem due to the small proportion of ictal events caused poor prediction performance in supervised learning approaches. This study aimed to present a personalized deep learning-based anomaly detection algorithm for seizure monitoring with behind-the-ear electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. We collected behind-the-ear EEG signals from 16 patients with epilepsy in the hospital and used them to develop and evaluate seizure detection algorithms. We modified the variational autoencoder network to learn the latent representation of normal EEG signals and performed seizure detection by measuring the anomalies in EEG signals using the trained network. To personalize the algorithm, we also proposed a method to calibrate the anomaly score for each patient by comparing the representations in the latent space. Our proposed algorithm showed a sensitivity of 90.4% with a false alarm rate of 0.83 per hour without personal calibration. On the other hand, the one-class support vector machine only showed a sensitivity of 84.6% with a false alarm rate of 2.17 per hour. Furthermore, our proposed model with personal calibration achieved 94.2% sensitivity with a false alarm rate of 0.29 while detecting 49 of 52 ictal events. We proposed a novel seizure detection algorithm with behind-the-ear EEG signals via semi-supervised learning of an anomaly detecting variational autoencoder and personalization method of anomaly scoring by comparing latent representations. Our approach achieved improved seizure detection with high sensitivity and a lower false alarm rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]