Search

espanolEste articulo tiene como objetivo presentar las distintas etapas utilizadas para el diseno y la produccion de un MOOC para empaques biodegradables y las herramientas de planificacion y metodologias utilizadas para el desarrollo de los temas y contenidos. Del mismo modo, se muestra el marco tecnologico utilizado realizando la vigilancia necesaria para identificar en que etapa esta la tecnologia de e-learning MOOC y la busqueda de terminos relacionados con “biodegradable packing” para identificar temas potenciales. Por ultimo, se explica la arquitectura de software para Selene (Plataforma tecnologica) y como se implementa en la plataforma Open edX. EnglishThis article aims to p res ent the diff er en td esi gn a nd p roduc tion stag es o f a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) for biodegradable packing and the planning tools and methodologies used for the development of the topics and contents. Likewise, it showed the technological framework used to make a surveillance technology to identify in which stage the MOOC e-learning tech is and how to search terms related to biodegra-dable packing to identify potential topics. Finally, due to the practice made, the software architecture for Selene (technology platform) is explained as well as how it is deployed in the open edX platform.

Summary. For increase of profitability of the food enterprises, decrease in an ecological trace from technogenic activity of the food industry the concept of development of low-waste and waste-free productions considered on the example of technology of receiving a biodegradable packing material from secondary material resources of food productions is offered: beer pellet, beet press, spirit bards, Pancake week press and bone glue. The technology of receiving biodegradable material from secondary material resources of food productions includes itself the following main stages: dehydration, crushing, mixing, leveling, formation, glazing. Advantage of the offered product consists of: - low cost of packing due to use of secondary material resources and full naturalness (now the raw materials for biodegradable packing specially are grown up on technical fields with use of GMO); - full decomposition in nature less than in 6 months according to GOST R 54533-2011 (EN 13432:2000) "Resource-saving. Packing. Requirements, criteria and the scheme of utilization of packing by means of a composting and biological decomposition"; - presence at the compost received at decomposition, the elements promoting increase of fertility of the soil. Application of technology allows reach at the same time three effects of a positive orientation: economic, ecological and social.

Introduction Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is used as a standard procedure. The optimum solution to minimize or eliminate all disadvantages of this procedure may be accomplished using biodegradable packs. Objective The aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction and clinical outcome associated with absorbable and non-absorbable packing after FESS. Methods In total, 50 patients were included in a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. One side was packed with polyurethane foam, while the opposite side was packed with gauze packing. On the 2nd, 10th, and 30th postoperative day, the patients were questioned with the aid of a visual analog scale. The standardized questionnaires for bleeding, nasal breathing, feeling of pressure, and headache were used. The presence of synechiae, infection, or granulation was noted and recorded with the video-endoscopy. Results A significant difference according to lower pressure was found in the NasoPore group compared to the controls on day ten after surgery. The NasoPore packing had lower scores with respect to postoperative nose blockage on the 2nd and 10th days. Mucosal healing was better for the NasoPore group, both at day ten and 30 compared with the control group. Conclusion The overall patient comfort is higher when using NasoPore compared to non-resorbable traditional impregnated gauze packing. Intensive saline douches applied three to four times per day are mandatory after the operation to prevent synechiae formation and fluid resorption by the packing. Resumo Introdução O tamponamento nasal após cirurgia sinusal endoscópica é procedimento de rotina. A solução ideal para minimizar ou eliminar as desvantagens desse procedimento pode ser alcançada com o uso de tampões biodegradáveis. Objetivo Comparar a satisfação do paciente e o desfecho clínico associados ao uso de tampões absorvíveis e não absorvíveis após a cirurgia funcional dos seios paranasais (FESS- Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery). Método Foram incluídos 50 pacientes neste estudo prospectivo, duplo-cego e randomizado. Um dos lados foi tamponado com espuma de poliuretano, enquanto no outro lado foi feito um tamponamento com gaze. Nos 2º, 10º e 30º dias após a operação, os pacientes foram perguntados com a ajuda de uma escala analógica visual. Foram empregados questionários padronizados para sangramento, respiração nasal, sensação de pressão e cefaleia. A presença de sinequias, infecção ou granulação foi registrada por videoendoscopia. Resultados Foi observada diferença significante, da sensação de pressão, menor no lado tratado com NasoPore vs. controles no 10º dia após a cirurgia. O tamponamento com NasoPore obteve escores mais baixos com respeito ao bloqueio nasal pós-operatório no 2º e 10º dias. A cicatrização da mucosa foi melhor no lado do NasoPore, mas no 10º e 30º dias os resultados foram comparáveis com os do lado de controle. Conclusão O conforto geral do paciente é maior com o uso de NasoPore vs. tamponamento tradicional com gaze besuntada não reabsorvível. O uso vigoroso de jatos de solução salina aplicados 3-4 vezes ao dia é um procedimento obrigatório após a cirurgia, para evitar a formação de sinequias e para uma absorção natural do tampão.