Search

Objective: We sought to characterize postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent an oncologic operation relative to whether the treating surgeon was an international medical graduate (IMG) versus a United States medical graduate (USMG). Background: IMGs comprise approximately one quarter of the physician workforce in the United States. Methods: The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files were utilized to extract data on patients with breast, lung, hepato-pancreatobiliary (HPB), and colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2014 and 2020. Entropy balancing and multivariable regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association between postoperative outcomes among USMG and IMG surgeons. Results: Among 285,930 beneficiaries, 242,914 (85.0%) and 43,016 (15.0%) underwent surgery by a USMG or IMG surgeon, respectively. Overall, 129,576 (45.3%) individuals were male, and 168,848 (59.1%) patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score >2. Notably, IMG surgeons were more likely to care for racial/ethnic minority patients (14.7% vs 12.5%) and individuals with a high social vulnerability index (33.3% vs 32.1%) (all P<0.001). On multivariable analysis after entropy balancing, patients treated by an IMG surgeon were less likely to experience adverse postoperative outcomes, including 90-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99] and index complications (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95) versus USMG surgeons (all P<0.05). Patients treated by IMG versus USMG surgeons had no difference in likelihood to achieve a textbook outcome (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.99-1.21; P=0.077). Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes among patients treated by IMG surgeons were roughly equivalent to those of USMG surgeons. In addition, IMG surgeons were more likely to care for patients with multiple comorbidities and individuals from vulnerable communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This was an age-stratified, retrospective, cohort study of patients between the ages of 65–69, 70–75 and ≥76 years diagnosed with high grade serous ovarian cancer of FIGO (2014) Stage 3a or higher between 01 January 2017 and April 2020. The study aimed to examine and compare patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes, including survival, of elderly patients within a single cancer centre in the south of England. Data collection began in January 2021 and concluded in March 2022. Ninety patients were eligible for the study. A correlation was observed between increasing age and worsening performance status (p = 0.044). Other variables assessed included age at diagnosis and time between decision to treatment, however, there was no evidence of correlations. The majority of patients studied received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery as their primary treatment modality, however, 53% of our eldest cohort underwent treatment types that did not involve surgery. Of those who did undergo surgery, there was no observed correlation between age and the rates of complete cyto-reductive surgery, intra-operative complications, admission to High Dependency Unit, or length of hospital stay. Median length of stay across all age groups was 5 days. Patients ≥76 years were more likely to receive singleagent carboplatin (p = 0.009) than dual-agent chemotherapy. There was no increase in chemo-toxicity events with increasing age. While primary cytoreductive surgery is favoured by many gynaecological oncology teams, neoadjuvant chemotherapy still offers a viable treatment alternative for elderly and frail patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer by minimising operative times, reducing admissions to high dependency units and shortening lengths of hospital stay. Geriatric assessments, in combination with performance status, may aid treatment decisions made by the multi-disciplinary team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for measuring exercise capacity, however, it is resource intensive and has limited availability. This study aimed to determine: 1) the association between the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) and the 30‐s sit‐to‐stand test (30STS) with CPET peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and anaerobic threshold (AT) and 2) 6MWT and 30STS cut points associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. Methods: A cross‐sectional study, retrospectively analyzing data collected from a tertiary cancer center over a 23‐month period. Measures included CPET VO2peak and AT, 6MWT and 30STS test. Correlations were used to characterize relationships between variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses determined 6MWT and 30STS cut points that aligned with CPET variable cut points. Results: Note that, 156 participants were included. The 6MWT and 30STS displayed moderate correlations with VO2peak, rho = 0.65, p = 0.01 and rho = 0.52, p < 0.005 respectively. Fair correlations were observed between AT and 6MWT (rho = 0.36, p = 0.01) and 30STS (rho = 0.41, p < 0.005). The optimal cut points to identify VO2peak < 15 mL/kg/min were 493.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test and for AT < 11 mL/kg/min were 506.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test. Conclusion: Both the 6MWT and 30STS test could be used as alternative tools for measuring exercise capacity preoperatively in the cancer setting where CPET is not available. A range of 6MWT and 30STS cut points, according to sensitivity and specificity levels, may be used to evaluate risk of postoperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a potent intervention for addressing obesity-related medical conditions and achieving sustainable weight loss. Beyond its conventional role, MBS has demonstrated potential to serve as a transitional step for patients requiring various interventions. However, the implications of MBS in the context of neoplasia remain understudied. To explore the feasibility of MBS as a possible attempt to reduce surgical and treatment risks in patients with benign tumors or low-grade cancers. Multicenter review from twelve tertiary referral centers spanning 8 countries. A retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of primary neoplasia, deemed inoperable or high-risk due to obesity, and receiving primary MBS prior to neoplastic therapy. Data encompassed baseline characteristics, neoplasia characteristics, MBS outcomes, and neoplastic therapy outcomes. Thirty-seven patients (median age 52 years, 75.7% female, median BMI of 49.1 kg/m2) were included. There were 9 distinct organs of origin of primary neoplasia, with the endometrium (43.2%) being the most common, followed by the pancreas, colon, kidney and breast. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was the most commonly performed MBS procedure (78.4%), with no MBS-related complications or mortalities reported over an average of 4.3 ± 3.9 years. Thirty-one patients (83.8%) eventually underwent neoplastic surgery, with a mean BMI decrease from 49.9 kg/m2 to 39.7 kg/m2 at surgery over an average of 5.8 ± 4.8 months. There were 2 (6.7%) documented mortalities associated with neoplastic surgical intervention. This study highlights the potential feasibility of employing MBS prior to neoplastic therapy in patients with low-grade, less aggressive neoplasms in the context of obesity. This underscores the importance of providing a personalized, case-to-case multidisciplinary approach in the management of these patients. • MBS might play a role in bridging patients with obesity and neoplasia to surgical intervention. • Sleeve (78.4%) is the most commonly selected MBS procedure for these patients. • Mean BMI decreased from 49.9 to 39.7 kg/m2 over an average of 5.8 ± 4.8 months. • 83.8% eventually underwent neoplastic surgery, with 2 (6.7%) documented mortalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The quality of recovery (QoR)-40 score has been used worldwide and validated in many surgical cohorts to assess global patient recovery. We aim to translate and culturally adapt the QoR-40 score into Hindi and test the validity and reliability of the translated version in patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods: The translation of the QoR-40 questionnaire was based on the forward and backward translation methods. Patients filled out the translated version of the QoR-40 preoperatively, on the third postoperative day in the morning (POD3) and the evening. The reliability of the translated questionnaire was checked for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability. Construct validity was assessed with a correlation coefficient value between the total QoR-40 score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and total length of hospital stay. Content validity was evaluated for feasibility and understanding. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 350 patients. The correlation coefficient r for repeatability was 0.21, the split-half test was 0.92, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82. The correlation between QoR-40 on POD3 with VAS score and length of stay was -0.35 and -0.67, respectively. The average time to complete the questionnaire was 3.8 minutes; 90% of the respondents found the translated questionnaire easy to understand, and 92% of the patients related the questions to their recovery. Conclusion: The Hindi translation of the QoR-40 questionnaire is a valid and reliable version of the original questionnaire in English to assess the QoR in Hindi-speaking patients after cancer surgery.

Simple Summary: The postoperative complication rate is high (30–64%) among patients undergoing major surgery for bladder cancer, and significantly increased for patients with a high alcohol use at the time of surgical intervention. Several markers have been used to estimate alcohol use—including questionnaires and biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy for identifying preoperative alcohol use of four markers (one questionnaire and three biomarkers) relative to the standard method (Timeline Follow Back interviews). This was done in a sample of 94 patients scheduled for major bladder cancer surgery. We found none of the tested markers were sufficiently reliable to identify preoperative risky alcohol use and, for now, the standard procedure seems preferable. Background: The postoperative complication rate is 30–64% among patients undergoing muscle-invasive and recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer surgery. Preoperative risky alcohol use increases the risk. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of markers for identifying preoperative risky alcohol. Methods: Diagnostic test sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (STOP-OP trial), based on a cohort of 94 patients scheduled for major bladder cancer surgery. Identification of risky alcohol use using Timeline Follow Back interviews (TLFB) were compared to the AUDIT–C questionnaire and three biomarkers: carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in plasma (P–CDT), phosphatidyl-ethanol in blood (B–PEth), and ethyl glucuronide in urine (U–EtG). Results: The correlation between TLFB and AUDIT–C was strong (ρ = 0.75), while it was moderate between TLFB and the biomarkers (ρ = 0.55–0.65). Overall, sensitivity ranged from 56 to 82% and specificity from 38 to 100%. B–PEth showed the lowest sensitivity at 56%, but the highest specificity of 100%. All tests had high positive predictive values (79–100%), but low negative predictive values (42–55%). Conclusions: Despite high positive predictive values, negative predictive values were weak compared to TLFB. For now, TLFB interviews seem preferable for preoperative identification of risky alcohol use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Patients with cancer undergoing curative-intent cancer surgery may require intraoperative blood transfusions. However, blood transfusions are not benign and can alone lead to increased risk of complications, infections, and mortality. This research was conducted to help understand this intervention's long-term complications (at 1 year postoperatively) to help improve approaches to managing these patients' complications. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Data for analysis were collected from the cases of all patients who received blood transfusions during curative cancer surgery at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, from December 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Results: In this timeframe, 604 patients had curative-intent cancer surgery, and 32 of them had intraoperative blood transfusions. Of the 32, 19 survived 1 year postoperatively while 13 died within 1 year postoperatively. Patients who died within that 1 year had significantly higher rates of vascular complications (p < 0.006). Additionally, 18/32 (54.54%) received more than 1 unit of blood. At that 1-year mark, there was no notable disparity observed between the 2 groups (1 unit versus multiple units of transfused blood) with regard to postoperative complications, mortality rates, or durations of hospital stay. Conclusions: Patients who did not survive 1 year postoperatively had many more vascular complications (e.g., pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis), compared to patients who survived to the same postoperative time point. To gain a deeper insight into this phenomenon, future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Managing vertebral metastases (VM) is still challenging in oncology, necessitating the use of effective surgical strategies to preserve patient quality of life (QoL). Traditional open posterior fusion (OPF) and percutaneous osteosynthesis (PO) are well-documented approaches, but their comparative efficacy remains debated. Methods: This retrospective study compared short-term outcomes (6–12 months) between OPF and PO in 78 cancer patients with spinal metastases. This comprehensive evaluation included functional, clinical, and radiographic parameters. Statistical analysis utilized PRISM software (version 10), with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: PO demonstrated advantages over OPF, including shorter surgical durations, reduced blood loss, and hospital stay, along with lower perioperative complication rates. Patient quality of life and functional outcomes favored PO, particularly at the 6-month mark. The mortality rates at one year were significantly lower in the PO group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive techniques offer promising benefits in VM management, optimizing patient outcomes and QoL. Despite limitations, this study advocates for the adoption of minimally invasive approaches to enhance the care of multi-metastatic patients with symptomatic VM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The quality of recovery (QoR)-40 score has been used worldwide and validated in many surgical cohorts to assess global patient recovery. We aim to translate and culturally adapt the QoR-40 score into Hindi and test the validity and reliability of the translated version in patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods: The translation of the QoR-40 questionnaire was based on the forward and backward translation methods. Patients filled out the translated version of the QoR-40 preoperatively, on the third postoperative day in the morning (POD3) and the evening. The reliability of the translated questionnaire was checked for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability. Construct validity was assessed with a correlation coefficient value between the total QoR-40 score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and total length of hospital stay. Content validity was evaluated for feasibility and understanding. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 350 patients. The correlation coefficient r for repeatability was 0.21, the split-half test was 0.92, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.82. The correlation between QoR-40 on POD3 with VAS score and length of stay was-0.35 and -0.67, respectively. The average time to complete the questionnaire was 3.8 minutes; 90% of the respondents found the translated questionnaire easy to understand, and 92% of the patients related the questions to their recovery. Conclusion: The Hindi translation of the QoR-40 questionnaire is a valid and reliable version of the original questionnaire in English to assess the QoR in Hindi-speaking patients after cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The assessment information of tumor margins is extremely important for the success of the breast cancer surgery and whether the patient undergoes a second operation. However, conducting surgical margin assessments is a time-consuming task that requires pathology-related skills and equipment, and often cannot be provided in a timely manner. To address this challenge, digital breast tomosynthesis technology was utilized to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the breast tissue and integrate deep learning algorithms for image segmentation, achieving an assessment of tumor margins during surgery. Methods: this study utilized post-operative tissue samples from 46 patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment, and generated image sets using digital breast tomosynthesis for the training and evaluation of deep learning models. Results: Deep learning algorithms effectively identifying the tumor area. They achieved a Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 0.91, global accuracy of 99%, weighted IoU of 44%, precision of 98%, recall of 83%, F1 score of 89%, and dice coefficient of 93% on the training dataset; for the testing dataset, MIoU was at 83%, global accuracy at 97%, weighted IoU at 38%, precision at 87%, recall rate at 69%, F1 score at 76%, dice coefficient at 86%. Conclusions: The initial evaluation suggests that the deep learning-based image segmentation method is highly accurate in measuring breast tumor margins. This helps provide information related to tumor margins during surgery, and by using different datasets, this research method can also be applied to the surgical margin assessment of various types of tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a new financing policy (25% bonus) on the centralization of radical surgical procedures for cancer treatment in high-volume hospitals in Poland. It builds on existing research that demonstrates a positive correlation between treatment outcomes and the volume of patients managed at a center, extending to various cancer types and treatment modalities including both surgical and non-surgical approaches. Material and methods. Reimbursement data was collected about all radical surgery procedures related to cancer treatment funded from public sources in Poland in 2019-2022. Hospitals were clustered in three groups: 1) high-volume, 2) “close to” high-volume, and 3) low-volume hospitals. To assess the maximum number of providers in each type of cancer surgery, the volume procedures for low-volume hospitals was recalculated. Results. In the years 2018-2022, over 450 hospitals provided radical surgery services in the 13 cancer groups studied. This value changed slightly during the period under study. In almost half of the analyzed cancer groups, the number of low-volume hospitals is increasing. An increasing number of hospitals are providing services below the thresholds. At the same time, across almost all studied groups, the number of high-volume hospitals also increased. Analysis of the distribution of services by clusters proves the gradual concentration of the market. The share of radical surgery services provided by low-volume hospitals decreased from 39% in 2019 to 35% in 2022. The share of services provided in high-volume hospitals increased gradually from 49% to 57% (highest for prostate, kidney and thyroid cancers). Conclusions. The financial model providing additional revenue for high-volume hospitals with additional requirements regarding the treatment process, as well as having no required minimal volume of procedures, induced the centralization of radical oncology surgery only insignificantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on the experiences of patients across all health disciplines, especially those of cancer patients. The study aimed to understand the experiences of cancer patients who underwent surgery during the first two waves of the pandemic at Guy’s Cancer Centre, which is a large tertiary cancer centre in London. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was adopted for this study. Firstly, a survey was co-designed by the research team and a patient study group. Patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to take part in this survey. Results were analysed descriptively. Three discussion groups were then conducted to focus on the main themes from the survey findings: communication, COVID-19 risk management and overall experience. These discussion groups were transcribed verbatim and underwent a thematic analysis using the NVivo software package. Results: Out of 1657 patients invited, a total of 250 (15%) participants took part in the survey with a mean age of 66 (SD 12.8) and 52% females. The sample was representative of a wide range of tumour sites and was reflective of those invited to take part. Overall, the experience of the cancer patients was positive. They felt that the safety protocols implemented at the hospital were effective. Communication was considered key, and patients were receptive to a change in the mode of communication from in-person to virtual. Conclusions: Despite the immense challenges faced by our Cancer Centre, patients undergoing surgery during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic had a generally positive experience with minimal disruptions to their planned surgery and ongoing care. Together with the COVID-19 safety precautions, effective communication between the clinical teams and the patients helped the overall patient experience during their surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between frailty and short-term and long-term outcomes in patients receiving elective surgery for cancer remains unclear, particularly in those admitted to the ICU. In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we included adults ≥16 yr old admitted to 158 ICUs in Australia from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022 after elective surgery for cancer. We investigated the association between frailty and survival time up to 4 yr (primary outcome), adjusting for a prespecified set of covariates. We analysed how this association changed in specific subgroups (age categories [<65, 65–80, ≥80 yr], and those who survived hospitalisation), and over time by splitting the survival information at monthly intervals. We included 35,848 patients (median follow-up: 18.1 months [inter-quartile range: 8.3–31.1 months], 19,979 [56.1%] male, median age 69.0 yr [inter-quartile range: 58.8–76.0 yr]). Some 3502 (9.8%) patients were frail (defined as clinical frailty scale ≥5). Frailty was associated with lower survival (hazard ratio: 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59–1.86 compared with clinical frailty scale ≤4); this was concordant across several sensitivity analyses. Frailty was most strongly associated with mortality early on in follow-up, up to 10 months (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.03–1.86), but this association plateaued, and its predictive capacity subsequently diminished with time up until 4 yr (1.96, 95% CI: 0.73–5.28). Frailty was associated with similar effects when stratified based on age, and in those who survived hospitalisation. Frailty was associated with poorer outcomes after an ICU admission after elective surgery for cancer, particularly in the short term. However, its predictive capacity with time diminished, suggesting a potential need for longitudinal reassessment to ensure appropriate prognostication in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indocyanine green (ICG) is one of the only clinically approved near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores used during fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), but it lacks tumor specificity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Several tumor-targeted fluorescent probes have been evaluated in PDAC patients, yet no uniformity or consensus exists among the surgical community on the current and future needs of FGS during PDAC surgery. In this first-published consensus report on FGS for PDAC, expert opinions were gathered on current use and future recommendations from surgeons' perspectives. A Delphi survey was conducted among international FGS experts via Google Forms. Experts were asked to anonymously vote on 76 statements, with ≥70% agreement considered consensus and ≥80% participation/statement considered vote robustness. Consensus was reached for 61/76 statements. All statements were considered robust. All experts agreed that FGS is safe with few drawbacks during PDAC surgery, but that it should not yet be implemented routinely for tumor identification due to a lack of PDAC-specific NIR tracers and insufficient evidence proving FGS's benefit over standard methods. However, aside from tumor imaging, surgeons suggest they would benefit from visualizing vasculature and surrounding anatomy with ICG during PDAC surgery. Future research could also benefit from identifying neuroendocrine tumors. More research focusing on standardization and combining tumor identification and vital-structure imaging would greatly improve FGS's use during PDAC surgery.

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in these patients. Materials and methods A search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science was carried out and included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that directly compared DOACs with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients after cancer surgery through July 25, 2023. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) within 30 days of surgery. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023445386). Results We retrieved 5149articles, selected 27 for eligibility, and included 10 studies (three RCTs and seven observational studies) encompassing 3054 patients who underwent postoperative thromboprophylaxis with DOACs (41%) or LMWH (59%). Compared to LMWH thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a comparable risk of VTE (RR:0.69[95% CI:0.46–1.02], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR:1.55 [95% CI:0.82–2.93], I2 = 2%), and CRNMB (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.4–1.98], I2 = 31%) during the 30-day postoperative period. Subgroup analysis of VTE and major bleeding suggested no differences according to study type, extended thromboprophylaxis, tumor types, or different types of DOAC. Conclusion DOACs are potentially effective alternatives to LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing cancer surgery, without increasing the risk of major bleeding events.

Background: Frailty is common in older patients with cancer; however, its clinical impact on the survival outcomes has seldom been examined in these patients. This study aimed to investigate the association of frailty with the survival outcomes and surgical complications in older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery in Taiwan. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 345 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed cancer who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2018. They were allocated into the fit, pre-frail, and frail groups according to comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) findings. Results: The fit, pre-frail, and frail groups comprised 62 (18.0%), 181 (52.5%), and 102 (29.5%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 (interquartile range, 40–53) months, the mortality rates were 12.9%, 31.5%, and 43.1%, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–3.39; p = 0.25) and 2.87 (95% CI, 1.10–5.35; p = 0.028) when the pre-frail and frail groups were compared with the fit group, respectively. The frail group had a significantly increased risk for a prolonged hospital stay (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.05–4.69; p = 0.022) compared with the fit group. Conclusion: Pretreatment frailty was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes and more surgical complications, with prolonged hospital stay, in the older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery. Preoperative frailty assessment can assist physicians in identifying patients at a high risk for surgical complications and predicting the survival outcomes of older patients with cancer.

Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients’ physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, ‘surgery schools’, and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation.

Background: The healthcare system in Ireland was profoundly affected by COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the impact of the pandemic on cancer surgery in Ireland, from 2019 to 2022 using three national health data sources. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study design was used and included: (i) cancer resections from the National Histopathology Quality Improvement (NHQI) Programmes; (ii) cancer surgery from the National Cancer Registry Ireland (NCRI), and (iii) cancer surgery from Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) System. Cancer surgery was presented by invasive/in situ and invasive only cancers (NCRI & HIPE), and by four main cancer types (breast, lung, colorectal & melanoma for NCRI & HIPE data only). Results: The annual number of cancer resections (NHQI) declined by 4.4% in 2020 but increased by 4% in 2021 compared with 2019. NCRI data indicated invasive/in-situ cancer surgery for the four main cancer types declined by 14% in 2020 and 5.1% in 2021, and by 12.3% and 7.3% for invasive cancer only, compared to 2019. Within HIPE for the same tumour types, invasive/in situ cancer surgery declined by 21.9% in 2020 and 9.9% in 2021 and by 20.8% and 9.6% for invasive cancer only. NHQI and HIPE data indicated an increase in the number of cancer surgeries performed in 2022. Conclusions: Cancer surgery declined in the initial pandemic waves suggests mitigation measures for cancer surgery, including utilising private hospitals for public patients, reduced the adverse impact on cancer surgery.

Background: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for extended thromboprophylaxis of abdominal/pelvic cancer-related postoperative thromboembolism (VTE) is unclear. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. LMWH in these patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of science through May 19th, 2023 for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared the outcomes with DOACs vs. LMWH for extended thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing abdominal/pelvic cancer surgery. Primary efficacy outcome was clinical VTE, and safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding complications reported within the 30-day postoperative period. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023413175). Results: We identified 5078 articles and selected 29 full-text articles for eligibility. A total of 9 studies (2 RCTs and 7 observational studies) encompassing 2651 patients were included for systematic review and 7 for meta-analysis. When compared with LMWH extended thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a similar incidence of VTE (RR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.32–1.33], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR: 1.68 [95% CI: 0.36–7.9], I2 = 26%), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.39–1.19], I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested no difference according to the study type (RCTs versus observational studies) regarding clinical VTE or major bleeding (Pinteraction = 0.43 and Pinteraction = 0.71, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that DOACs for extended thromboprophylaxis were an effective and safe alternative to LMWH after major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in these patients. Materials and methods: A search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science was carried out and included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that directly compared DOACs with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients after cancer surgery through July 25, 2023. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) within 30 days of surgery. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023445386). Results: We retrieved 5149articles, selected 27 for eligibility, and included 10 studies (three RCTs and seven observational studies) encompassing 3054 patients who underwent postoperative thromboprophylaxis with DOACs (41%) or LMWH (59%). Compared to LMWH thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a comparable risk of VTE (RR:0.69[95% CI:0.46–1.02], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR:1.55 [95% CI:0.82–2.93], I2 = 2%), and CRNMB (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.4–1.98], I2 = 31%) during the 30-day postoperative period. Subgroup analysis of VTE and major bleeding suggested no differences according to study type, extended thromboprophylaxis, tumor types, or different types of DOAC. Conclusion: DOACs are potentially effective alternatives to LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing cancer surgery, without increasing the risk of major bleeding events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients' physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, 'surgery schools', and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Frailty is common in older patients with cancer; however, its clinical impact on the survival outcomes has seldom been examined in these patients. This study aimed to investigate the association of frailty with the survival outcomes and surgical complications in older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery in Taiwan. We prospectively enrolled 345 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed cancer who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2018. They were allocated into the fit, pre-frail, and frail groups according to comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) findings. The fit, pre-frail, and frail groups comprised 62 (18.0%), 181 (52.5%), and 102 (29.5%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 (interquartile range, 40–53) months, the mortality rates were 12.9%, 31.5%, and 43.1%, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–3.39; p = 0.25) and 2.87 (95% CI, 1.10–5.35; p = 0.028) when the pre-frail and frail groups were compared with the fit group, respectively. The frail group had a significantly increased risk for a prolonged hospital stay (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.05–4.69; p = 0.022) compared with the fit group. Pretreatment frailty was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes and more surgical complications, with prolonged hospital stay, in the older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery. Preoperative frailty assessment can assist physicians in identifying patients at a high risk for surgical complications and predicting the survival outcomes of older patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For tumors wherein cancer cells remain in the tissue after colorectal cancer surgery, a hyperthermic anticancer agent is injected into the abdominal cavity to necrotize the remaining cancer cells with heat using a hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy system. However, during circulation, the processing temperature is out of range and the processing result is deteriorated. This paper proposes a look-up table (LUT) module design method that can stably maintain the processing temperature range during circulation via feedback. If the temperature decreases or increases, the LUT transmits a command signal to the heat exchanger to reduce or increase heat input, thereby maintaining the treatment temperature range. The command signal for increasing and decreasing heat input is Tp and Ta, respectively. The command signal for the treatment temperature range is Ts. If drug temperatures below 41 and above 43 °C are input to the LUT, it sends a Tp or Ta signal to the heat exchanger to increase or decrease the input heat, respectively. If the drug's temperature is 41–43 °C, the LUT generates a Ts signal and proceeds with the treatment. The proposed system can automatically control drug temperature using temperature feedback to ensure rapid, accurate, and safe treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & objective: Preventive analgesia is implied before the actual surgical insult occurs and it is aimed to reduce the neuro-humoral changes associated with surgical induced pain. Different methods have been used by the anesthesiologists for this purpose. We studied the effect of pre-emptive oral tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg on post-operative pain, the requirement of rescue analgesics and the stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in breast cancer surgery patients. Methodology: A randomized double blinded, placebo-controlled trial, was conducted in the Department of Anesthesia, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore (Pakistan) after ethical approval by the hospital Scientific Review Committee and Institutional Review Board. Atotal of 30 patients, undergoing breast cancer surgery, were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Group A (study group) patients were given tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg orally, and Group B (control group) received two soda mint tablets orally 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia. Standard monitoring was done and routine general anesthesia was administered with intubation. After recovery, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and time to rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption, were recorded. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.20. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean ages in Group A and B were 36.67 ± 9.50 y and 41.80 ± 12.43 y (P = 0.236). The differences in intra-operative morphine and rescue morphine use in both groups were not significant (P = 0.139 and 0.293, The rescue analgesic use and VAS scores in PACU were significantly different in both groups (P = 0.005 and P = 0.022, respectively). Total PACU stay in Group A was 79.33 ± 26.31 min and in Group B was 96.67 ± 34.98 min (P = 0.281). Tramadol use in the ward was not statistically equivalent (P = 0.300). Mean post-operative rescue morphine was 0.2 ± 0.775 mg/kg in control group as compared to placebo group was 1.4 ± 1.682 mg/kg, which was statistically significant (P = 0.02). VAS scores in PACU in both groups showed statistically differences, e.g., 1.33 ± 1.1 vs 2.70 ± 1.60 (P = 0.01). PACU stay time was also higher in the control group. Conclusion: The use of pre-emptive analgesia with oral tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg 30 min before the surgery can reduce the requirement of peri operative opioid use, achieve better pain control and early recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was completed to evaluate the relationship between tumor length and the prognosis of patients with pathological stage IA-IC esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database (United States, 2006–2015). X-tile software and ROC analysis were mainly used to explore the best threshold of tumor length for dividing patients into different groups, and then propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance other variables between groups. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS). A total of 762 patients were identified, and 500 patients were left after PSM. Twenty millimeters were used as the threshold of tumor length. Patients with longer tumor lengths showed worse OS (median: 93 vs. 128 months; P  = 0.006). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that longer tumor length was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio 1.512, 95% confidence interval, 1.158–1.974, P  = 0.002). Tumor length has an impact on patients with pathological stage IA-IC EAC who undergo surgery alone. The prognostic value of the pathological stage group may be improved after combining it with tumor length and age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Declining cancer surgery represents a conflict between patients' rights to autonomy and providers' perspectives of best practice. We hypothesize that, among patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer, patient demographics would be associated with different rates of declination of lung cancer surgery. Patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from 2004 to 2018 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Patients were categorized into two groups based on surgical treatment: surgical resection and declined surgery. Patient characteristics were compared using bivariate and multivariate models to identify factors associated with surgical declination. Additionally, we performed subgroup analyses of cT1N0M0 patients with no comorbidities. Survival analysis done using multivariate cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. 478,757 patients were identified. In a multivariate model, declining surgery was associated with increased age (odds ratio 1.09, 1.09-1.10), non-Hispanic Black race (odds ratio 1.95, 1.73-2.21), nonprivate insurance, and lower Socioeconomic Status. In a subgroup of cT1N0M0 patients with no comorbidities, declining surgery was associated with increasing age, non-Hispanic Black race, nonprivate insurance, and socioeconomic status. Patient's that declined surgery demonstrated lower overall survival when compared to patients that underwent surgical resection (5 y overall survival: declined surgery 40% versus underwent resection 72%, P < 0.001). Although early-stage lung cancer is potentially curable, many patients decline guideline-based surgery, and have worse overall survival. There are social and economic factors associated with patients declining lung cancer surgery. Providers have an ethical responsibility to understand the basis of patient's decision to decline recommended surgery and address endemic disparities related to race and access to care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) for oesophageal and gastric carcinoma is associated with local recurrence and poorer long-term survival. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a non-invasive technology able to distinguish tissue type based on spectral data. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning-based method for DRS probe detection and tracking to aid classification of tumour and non-tumour gastrointestinal (GI) tissue in real time. Methods: Data collected from both ex vivo human tissue specimen and sold tissue phantoms were used for the training and retrospective validation of the developed neural network framework. Specifically, a neural network based on the You Only Look Once (YOLO) v5 network was developed to accurately detect and track the tip of the DRS probe on video data acquired during an ex vivo clinical study. Results: Different metrics were used to analyse the performance of the proposed probe detection and tracking framework, such as precision, recall, mAP 0.5, and Euclidean distance. Overall, the developed framework achieved a 93% precision at 23 FPS for probe detection, while the average Euclidean distance error was 4.90 pixels. Conclusion: The use of a deep learning approach for markerless DRS probe detection and tracking system could pave the way for real-time classification of GI tissue to aid margin assessment in cancer resection surgery and has potential to be applied in routine surgical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the impact of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) versus inhalational anesthesia (IA) on the overall survival following cancer surgery. Background: The association between intraoperative anesthetics and patients' long-term outcomes following cancer surgery remains controversial. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used nationwide data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Adult patients who underwent cancer resection surgery (breast, gastric, lung, liver, kidney, colorectal, pancreatic, esophageal, and bladder cancer) under general anesthesia between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into propofol-based TIVA or IA groups according to the type of anesthesia received. A total of 312,985 patients (37,063 in the propofol-based TIVA group and 275,922 patients in the IA group) were eligible for analysis. The primary outcome was the comparison of overall survival following surgery between the groups in each cancer type. We compared the all-cause mortality between the 2 groups, stratified by cancer type using time-dependent Cox regression after propensity score- based inverse probability of treatment weighting. We further examined the comparison of overall survival in a meta-analysis using data from our study and previously published data comparing propofol-based TIVA with IA after cancer surgery. Results: The number of deaths in the propofol-based TIVA and IA groups was 5037 (13.6%) and 45,904 (16.6%), respectively; the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 1192 (637-2011) days. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed no significant association between the type of general anesthesia and overall survival after cancer surgery in the weighted cohort for each cancer type (all P>0.05) and for total population [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.04]. In a meta-analysis, single-center studies showed higher overall survival in the TIVA group than in the IA group (pooled adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47-0.91, P= 0.01), while multicenter studies showed insignificant pooled adjusted HRs (pooled adjusted HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.82-1.33, P=0.71). Conclusions: There is no association between the type of general anesthesia used during cancer surgery and postoperative overall, 1-, and 5-year survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of our study was to report about the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent major surgery for cancer and developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period. A retrospective and observational study was done in the Surgical Oncology Division of a tertiary care cancer hospital in North-East India. The study period was from 1st April 2020 to 31st December 2021. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer who underwent a major surgery and developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period, within the same hospital stay were included in the study. Data was obtained from a prospectively maintained database and case records. Descriptive statistics were used to state the results in median values, range and percentages. A total of 22 patients developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period during the study period out of a total of 1402 patients operated during that time period (1.57%). The have been followed up for a median period of 16 months (range 2 to 18 months). The median age at presentation was 50 years (range 25 to 74 years). The incidence of co-morbidities was 27.3%. The median duration of ICU stay was 3 days (range 0 to 9 days) and median duration of hospital stay was 22 days (range 9 to 55 days).. The postoperative mortality rate was 18.2%. COVID-19 in the postoperative period in patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgeries for cancer caused high postoperative mortality and prolonged hospital stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intra-operative fluorescence imaging has demonstrated its ability to improve tumor lesion identification. However, the limited tissue penetration of the fluorescent signals hinders the detection of deep-lying or occult lesions. Integrating fluorescence imaging with SPECT and/or intra-operative gammaprobing synergistically combines the deep tissue penetration of gamma rays for tumor localization with the precision of fluorescence imaging for precise tumor resection. In this study, we detail the use of a genetically encoded multifunctional handle, henceforth referred to as a GEM-handle, for the development of fluorescent/radioactive bimodal single-domain antibody (sdAb)-based tracers. A sdAb that targets the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) was engineered to carry a GEM-handle containing a carboxy-terminal hexahistidinetag and cysteine-tag. A two-step labeling strategy was optimized and applied to site-specifically label IRDye800CW and 99mTc to the sdAb. Bimodal labeling of the sdAbs proved straightforward and successful. 99mTc activity was however restricted to 18.5 MBq per nmol fluorescently-labeled sdAb to prevent radiobleaching of IRDye800CW without impeding SPECT/CT imaging. Subsequently, the in vivo biodistribution and tumor-targeting capacity of the bimodal tracer were evaluated in uPAR-positive tumor-bearing mice using SPECT/CT and fluorescence imaging. The bimodal sdAb showed expected renal background signals due to tracer clearance, along with slightly elevated non-specific liver signals. Four hours post-injection, both SPECT/CT and fluorescent images achieved satisfactory tumor uptake and contrast, with significantly higher values observed for the anti-uPAR bimodal sdAb compared to a control non-targeting sdAb. In conclusion, the GEM-handle is a convenient method for designing and producing bimodal sdAb-based tracers with adequate in vivo characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backgrounds: The association between anesthesia and long-term oncological outcome after cancer surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of propofol-based anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until November 15, 2023. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Results: We included forty-two retrospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 686,923 patients. Propofol-based anesthesia was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI:0.76–0.88, P

Pectus excavatum (PE) causes cardiopulmonary dysfunction depending on the degree and form of the depression. The patient was a 74-year-old woman with a history of PE. Fourteen years ago, a total glossolaryngectomy was performed for oropharyngeal cancer. Two years later, the patient gradually experienced difficulty in breathing. Computed tomography (CT) revealed severe PE and right main bronchial stenosis. We performed a Nuss procedure for PE repair to surgically release the stenosis of the right main bronchus. Postoperative chest CT showed improvement in the sternal depression and right main bronchial stenosis. Furthermore, shortness of breath was relieved postoperatively. Oropharyngeal cancer surgery may cause tracheal support disruption, leading to leftward shift and severe stenosis of the right main bronchus due to sternum depression. This is an important report regarding respiratory distress caused by a combination of PE and post-oropharyngeal cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The postoperative complication rate is 30–64% among patients undergoing muscle-invasive and recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer surgery. Preoperative risky alcohol use increases the risk. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of markers for identifying preoperative risky alcohol. Methods: Diagnostic test sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (STOP-OP trial), based on a cohort of 94 patients scheduled for major bladder cancer surgery. Identification of risky alcohol use using Timeline Follow Back interviews (TLFB) were compared to the AUDIT–C questionnaire and three biomarkers: carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in plasma (P–CDT), phosphatidyl-ethanol in blood (B–PEth), and ethyl glucuronide in urine (U–EtG). Results: The correlation between TLFB and AUDIT–C was strong (ρ = 0.75), while it was moderate between TLFB and the biomarkers (ρ = 0.55–0.65). Overall, sensitivity ranged from 56 to 82% and specificity from 38 to 100%. B–PEth showed the lowest sensitivity at 56%, but the highest specificity of 100%. All tests had high positive predictive values (79–100%), but low negative predictive values (42–55%). Conclusions: Despite high positive predictive values, negative predictive values were weak compared to TLFB. For now, TLFB interviews seem preferable for preoperative identification of risky alcohol use.

Background: The assessment information of tumor margins is extremely important for the success of the breast cancer surgery and whether the patient undergoes a second operation. However, conducting surgical margin assessments is a time-consuming task that requires pathology-related skills and equipment, and often cannot be provided in a timely manner. To address this challenge, digital breast tomosynthesis technology was utilized to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the breast tissue and integrate deep learning algorithms for image segmentation, achieving an assessment of tumor margins during surgery. Methods: this study utilized post-operative tissue samples from 46 patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment, and generated image sets using digital breast tomosynthesis for the training and evaluation of deep learning models. Results: Deep learning algorithms effectively identifying the tumor area. They achieved a Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 0.91, global accuracy of 99%, weighted IoU of 44%, precision of 98%, recall of 83%, F1 score of 89%, and dice coefficient of 93% on the training dataset; for the testing dataset, MIoU was at 83%, global accuracy at 97%, weighted IoU at 38%, precision at 87%, recall rate at 69%, F1 score at 76%, dice coefficient at 86%. Conclusions: The initial evaluation suggests that the deep learning-based image segmentation method is highly accurate in measuring breast tumor margins. This helps provide information related to tumor margins during surgery, and by using different datasets, this research method can also be applied to the surgical margin assessment of various types of tumors.

Background: With the global disease burden of cancer increasing, and with at least 60% of cancer patients requiring surgery and, hence, anaesthesia over their disease course, the question of whether anaesthetic and analgesia techniques during primary cancer resection surgery might influence long term oncological outcomes assumes high priority. Methods: We searched the available literature linking anaesthetic-analgesic techniques and strategies during tumour resection surgery to oncological outcomes and synthesised this narrative review, predominantly using studies published since 2019. Current evidence is presented around opioids, regional anaesthesia, propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anaesthesia, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and beta-blockers. Conclusions: The research base in onco-anaesthesia is expanding. There continue to be few sufficiently powered RCTs, which are necessary to confirm a causal link between any perioperative intervention and long-term oncologic outcome. In the absence of any convincing Level 1 recommending a change in practice, long-term oncologic benefit should not be part of the decision on choice of anaesthetic technique for tumour resection surgery.

Abstract Aim This study investigated healthcare professionals' attitudes and perceptions towards the family's participation in surgical cancer care. Design A prospective mixed method study. Methods The study was conducted at three hospitals in Sweden with registered nurses, assistant nurses and surgeons. Data included 43 completed Families Importance in Nursing Care (FINC‐NA) questionnaires answered by registered nurses and qualitative data from 14 interviews with surgeons and assistant nurses. Data analysis was performed according to the Creswell convergent parallel mixed method. Results Both quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated that the family was an important resource in nursing care, was highly valued as a conversational partner and had resources that should be considered. Each family should be supported in determining their role and as implements for maintaining a functioning family constellation and increasing their participation. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.