Search

Simple Summary: Quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC; ER−, PR−, HER2−, and AR−) is a highly proliferative subtype of breast cancer that has no targeted treatment options. Chemotherapy, which is toxic to both malignant and healthy cells, is the mainstay treatment for this subpopulation. Centrosome amplification and clustering are cancer cell-specific traits that are upregulated in QNBC relative to other subtypes; thus, centrosome declustering drugs have been suggested to be a promising anticancer therapeutic strategy for this subgroup. However, the targeting of new centrosome biogenesis is neglected, rendering these drugs less effective. Herein, we propose targeting FOXM1, a master transcription regulator that drives the synchronous upregulation of centrosome amplification and clustering genes to circumvent this neglect. We discovered an overdrive of a FOXM1-mediated transcriptional signaling cascade in AR-low relative to AR-high triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Hence, we assert that targeting FOXM1 may be a more efficacious anticancer strategy than centrosome declustering alone, suggesting FOXM1 could be a promising biomarker and actionable target in AR-low TNBC. There are currently no approved targeted treatments for quadruple-negative breast cancer [QNBC; ER−/PR−/HER2−/androgen receptor (AR)−], a subtype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). AR-low TNBC is more proliferative and clinically aggressive than AR-high TNBC. Centrosome amplification (CA), a cancer hallmark, is rampant in TNBC, where it induces spindle multipolarity-mediated cell death unless centrosome clustering pathways are co-upregulated to avert these sequelae. We recently showed that genes that confer CA and centrosome clustering are strongly overexpressed in AR-low TNBCs relative to AR-high TNBCs. However, the molecular mechanisms that index centrosome clustering to the levels of CA are undefined. We argue that FOXM1, a cell cycle-regulated oncogene, links the expression of genes that drive CA to the expression of genes that act at kinetochores and along microtubules to facilitate centrosome clustering. We provide compelling evidence that upregulation of the FOXM1-E2F1-ATAD2 oncogene triad in AR-low TNBC is accompanied by CA and the co-upregulation of centrosome clustering proteins such as KIFC1, AURKB, BIRC5, and CDCA8, conferring profound dysregulation of cell cycle controls. Targeting FOXM1 in AR-low TNBC may render cancer cells incapable of clustering their centrosomes and impair their ability to generate excess centrosomes. Hence, our review illuminates FOXM1 as a potential actionable target for AR-low TNBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Centrosome amplification is a hallmark of cancer and PLK4 is one of the responsible factors for cancer associated centrosome amplification. Increased PLK4 levels was also shown to contribute to generation of cells with centriole amplification in mammalian tissues as olfactory neuron progenitor cells. PLK4 overexpression generates centriole rosette (CR) structures which harbor more than two centrioles each. Long term PLK4 overexpression results with centrosome amplification, but the maturation of amplified centrioles in CRs and linking of PLK4 induced amplified centrosomes has not yet been investigated in detail. Here, we show evidence for generation of large clustered centrosomes which have more than 2 centriole rosettes and define these structures as centriole rosette clusters (CRCs) in cells that have high PLK4 levels for 2 consecutive cell cycles. In addition, we show that PLK4 induced CRs follow normal centrosomal maturation processes and generate CRC structures that are inter-connected with canonical centrosomal linker proteins as C-Nap1, Rootletin and Cep68 in the second cell cycle after PLK4 induction. Increased PLK4 levels in cells with C-Nap1 and Rootletin knock-out resulted with distanced CRs and CRCs in interphase, while Nek2 knock-out inhibited separation of CRCs in prometaphase, providing functional evidence for the binding of CRC structures with centrosomal linker proteins. Taken together, these results suggest a cell cycle dependent model for PLK4 induced centrosome amplification which occurs in 2 consecutive cell cycles: (i) CR state in the first cell cycle, and (ii) CRC state in the second cell cycle.

Cadmium (Cd) is a prevalent heavy metal contaminant that can cause centrosome amplification (CA) and cancer. Since CA can initiate tumorigenesis, it is plausible that cadmium initiates tumorigenesis via CA. The present study investigated the signaling pathways underlying CA by Cd. Our findings confirmed that sub-toxic concentrations of Cd could induce CA in the HCT116 colon cancer cells, and revealed that reactive oxygen species (ROS), GCLM, CCDC85C and PLK4 were the signaling molecules that formed a pathway of ROS-GCLM-CCDC85C-PLK4. Cd not only increased the protein levels of CCDC85C and PLK4, but also promoted their distribution to the centrosomes. Molecular docking analysis revealed that CCDC85C and PLK4 had the binding potential. Indeed, antibodies against CCDC85C and PLK4 were able to pull down PLK4 and CCDC85C, respectively. Knockdown of CCDC85C decreased the Cd-promoted centrosomal distribution of PLK4. Similarly, knockdown of PLK4 reduced the centrosomal distribution of CCDC85C. Our results suggest that Cd activates ROS-GCLM pathway that triggers the expression of and binding between CCDC85C and PLK4, and promotes the translocation of CCDC85C-PLK4 complex to the centrosomes, which eventually leads to CA. • GCLM and CCDC85C are new players for centrosome amplification. • CCDC85C binds with PLK4 and contributes to its localization on the centrosome. • Cd promotes CA through the ROS-GCLM-CCDC85C-PLK4 pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Centrosome amplification is a well-recognized oncogenic driver of tumor initiation and progression across a variety of malignancies and has been linked with tumor aggressiveness, metastasis, and adverse prognosis. Nevertheless, the significance of centrosome amplification in HCC is not well understood. Methods: The TCGA dataset was downloaded for centrosome amplification-related signature construction using the LASSO-penalized Cox regression algorithm, while the ICGC dataset was obtained for signature validation. Single-cell RNA sequencing from GSE149614 was analyzed to profile gene expression and the liver tumor niche. Results: A total of 134 centrosome amplification-related prognostic genes in HCC were detected and 6 key prognostic genes (SSX2IP, SPAG4, SAC3D1, NPM1, CSNK1D, and CEP55) among them were screened out to construct a signature with both high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis and prognosis of HCC patients. The signature, as an independent factor, was associated with frequent recurrences, high mortality rates, advanced clinicopathologic features, and high vascular invasions. Moreover, the signature was intimately associated with cell cycle-related pathways and TP53 mutation profile, suggesting its underlying role in accelerating cell cycle progression and leading to liver cancer development. Meanwhile, the signature was also closely correlated with immunosuppressive cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression, making it a vital immunosuppressive factor in the tumor microenvironment. Upon single-cell RNA sequencing, SSX2IP and SAC3D1 were found to be specially expressed in liver cancer stem-like cells, where they promoted cell cycle progression and hypoxia. Conclusions: This study provided a direct molecular link of centrosome amplification with clinical characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and clinical drug-response, highlighting the critical role of centrosome amplification in liver cancer development and therapy resistance, thereby providing valuable insights into prognostic prediction and therapeutic response of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The centrosome is involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization during interphase and in mitotic spindle assembly during cell division. Centrosome amplification (abnormal proliferation of centrosome number) has been observed in several types of cancer and in precancerous conditions. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanism of centrosome amplification in order to understand the early stage of carcinogenesis. Primary cells could be used to better understand the early stage of carcinogenesis rather than immortalized cells, which tend to have various genetic and epigenetic changes. Previously, we demonstrated that a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, 3-aminobenzamide (3AB), which is known to be nontoxic and nonmutagenic, could induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy in CHO-K1 cells. In this study, we compared primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and immortalized MEF using 3AB. Although centrosome amplification was induced with 3AB treatment in immortalized MEF, a more potent PARP inhibitor, AG14361, was required for primary MEF. However, after centrosome amplification, neither 3AB in immortalized MEF nor AG14361 in primary MEF caused chromosomal aneuploidy, suggesting that further genetic and/or epigenetic change(s) are required to exhibit aneuploidy. The DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin and γ-irradiation can cause cancer and centrosome amplification in experimental animals. Although doxorubicin and γ-irradiation induced centrosome amplification and led to decreased p27Kip protein levels in immortalized MEF and primary MEF, the phosphorylation ratio of nucleophosmin (Thr199) increased in immortalized MEF, whereas it decreased in primary MEF. These results suggest that there exists a yet unidentified pathway, different from the nucleophosmin phosphorylation pathway, which can cause centrosome amplification in primary MEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known human lung carcinogen with widespread exposure in environmental and occupational settings. Despite well-known cancer risks, the molecular mechanisms of Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis are not well understood, but a major driver of Cr(VI) carcinogenesis is chromosome instability. Previously, we reported Cr(VI) induced numerical chromosome instability, premature centriole disengagement, centrosome amplification, premature centromere division, and spindle assembly checkpoint bypass. A key regulator of these events is securin, which acts by regulating the cleavage ability of separase. Thus, in this study we investigated securin disruption by Cr(VI) exposure. We exposed human lung cells to a particulate Cr(VI) compound, zinc chromate, for acute (24 h) and prolonged (120 h) time points. We found prolonged Cr(VI) exposure caused marked decrease in securin levels and function. After prolonged exposure at the highest concentration, securin protein levels were decreased to 15.3% of control cells, while securin mRNA quantification was 7.9% relative to control cells. Additionally, loss of securin function led to increased separase activity manifested as enhanced cleavage of separase substrates; separase, kendrin, and SCC1. These data show securin is targeted by prolonged Cr(VI) exposure in human lung cells. Thus, a new mechanistic model for Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis emerges with centrosome and centromere disruption as key components of numerical chromosome instability, a key driver in Cr(VI) carcinogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammation is implicated in the development of diabetic complications including vascular pathology. Centrosome is known to play a role in cell secretion. We have reported that diabetes can trigger centrosome amplification (CA). Thus, in the present study, we investigated the relationship between CA and the release of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 in hCMEC/D3 human endothelial cells treated with advanced glycation end products (AGEs). We found that AGEs induced CA via PLK4 and increased the biosynthesis of the three cytokines via NF-κB. Importantly, treatment of the cells with AGEs also increased the release of the three cytokines. Inhibiting CA by knockdown of polo like kinase 4 (PLK4) attenuated the cytokine release but not their biosynthesis. Knockdown of the cytokines inhibited the CA, while addition of the cytokines individually to the cell culture increased the protein level of PLK4 and CA to a moderate level. Addition of the three cytokines together into the cell culture markedly enhanced the CA, to a level higher than that in the AGEs-treated group. In conclusion, our results provide the direct evidence that the cytokines can induce CA, and suggest that there is a mutual promoting cycle between CA and cytokine release in the treated samples. It is proposed that the cycle of CA-cytokine release is a candidate biological link between diabetes and its complications such as vascular pathologies. • Our study indicates that centrosome amplification can be caused by proinflammatory cytokines (i.e. IL1-β, TNFα, and IL6). • We have confirmed that centrosome amplification can enhance the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines. • Our results indicated a mutual-promoting cycle between centrosome amplification and the release of the cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Centrosome amplification (CA) is a prominent feature of human cancers linked to tumorigenesis in vivo. Here, we report mechanistic contributions of CA induction alone to tumour architecture and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling. CA induction in nontumorigenic breast cells MCF10A causes cell migration and invasion, with underlying disruption of epithelial cell--cell junction integrity and dysregulation of expression and subcellular localisation of cell junction proteins. CA also elevates expression of integrin β-3, its binding partner fibronectin-1 and matrix metalloproteinase enzymes, promoting cell--ECM attachment, ECM degradation, and a migratory and invasive cell phenotype. Using a chicken embryo xenograft model for in vivo validation, we show that CA-induced (+CA) MCF10A cells invade into the chick mesodermal layer, with inflammatory cell infiltration and marked focal reactions between chorioallantoic membrane and cell graft. We also demonstrate a key role of small GTPase Rap-1 signalling through inhibition using GGTI- 298, which blocked various CA-induced effects. These insights reveal that in normal cells, CA induction alone (without additional oncogenic alterations) is sufficient to confer early pro-tumorigenic changes within days, acting through Rap-1-dependent signalling to alter cell--cell contacts and ECM disruption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intracellular organelle organization is conserved in eukaryotic cells and is primarily achieved through active transport by motor proteins along the microtubule cytoskeleton. Microtubule post‐translational modifications (PTMs) can contribute to microtubule diversity and differentially regulate motor‐mediated transport. Here, we show that centrosome amplification, commonly observed in cancer and shown to promote aneuploidy and invasion, induces a global change in organelle positioning towards the cell periphery and facilitates nuclear migration through confined spaces. This reorganization requires kinesin‐1 and is analogous to the loss of dynein. Cells with amplified centrosomes display increased levels of acetylated tubulin, a PTM that could enhance kinesin‐1‐mediated transport. Depletion of α‐tubulin acetyltransferase 1 (αTAT1) to block tubulin acetylation rescues the displacement of centrosomes, mitochondria, and vimentin but not Golgi or endosomes. Analyses of the distribution of total and acetylated microtubules indicate that the polarized distribution of modified microtubules, rather than levels alone, plays an important role in the positioning of specific organelles, such as the centrosome. We propose that increased tubulin acetylation differentially impacts kinesin‐1‐mediated organelle displacement to regulate intracellular organization. Synopsis: Cellular adaptation and response to physiological cues require the relocation of individual organelles. Here, centrosome amplification, a common feature of many cancers, is shown to promote cell migration through confined spaces due to an altered intracellular organization, which is partly regulated by tubulin acetylation.Centrosome amplification causes kinesin‐1‐dependent repositioning of various intracellular components towards the cell periphery.Increased tubulin acetylation downstream of centrosome amplification promotes the displacement of mitochondria, centrosomes, and vimentin.Increased tubulin acetylation facilitates migration through confined spaces.The positioning of centrosomes is determined by the polarized distribution of acetylated microtubules, rather than by the level of tubulin acetylation alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hexavalent chromium can promote centrosome amplification (CA) as well as tumorigenesis. Since CA can lead to tumorigenesis, it is plausible that the chromium promotes the development of cancer via CA. In the present study, we investigated the signaling pathways of the chromium-induced CA. Our results showed that sub-toxic concentration of chromium was able to cause CA in HCT116 cells, and decrease the expression of TMOD2 and NPM2. Furthermore, TMOD2 and NPM2 interacted to each other via their C-terminal and the N-terminal, respectively, which was inhibited by the chromium. Overexpression of TMOD2 and NPM2 increased their binding and significantly attenuated the CA. Moreover, TMOD2 and NPM2 were co-localized with the centrosomes. The chromium inhibited the centrosomeal localization of NPM2, which was reversed by the overexpression of TMOD2, C-terminal of TMOD2, but not the N-terminal of NPM2. Our results suggest that the chromium induces CA via inhibiting the binding between TMOD2 and NPM2 as well as the dissociation of NPM2 from centrosomes. • Hexavalent chromium inhibited TMOD2-NPM2 signaling pathway. • The inhibition of TMOD2-NPM2 induce centrosome amplification. • TMOD2 interacts with the N-terminal of NPM2 by its C-terminal. • The interaction contributes to the centrosomal localization of NPM2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The centrosome in animal cells is instrumental in spindle pole formation, nucleation, proper alignment of microtubules during cell division, and distribution of chromosomes in each daughter cell. Centrosome amplification involving structural and numerical abnormalities in the centrosome can cause chromosomal instability and dysregulation of the cell cycle, leading to cancer development and metastasis. However, disturbances caused by centrosome amplification can also limit cancer cell survival by activating mitotic checkpoints and promoting mitotic catastrophe. As a smart escape, cancer cells cluster their surplus of centrosomes into pseudo‐bipolar spindles and progress through the cell cycle. This phenomenon, known as centrosome clustering (CC), involves many proteins and has garnered considerable attention as a specific cancer cell‐targeting weapon. The kinesin‐14 motor protein KIFC1 is a minus end‐directed motor protein that is involved in CC. Because KIFC1 is upregulated in various cancers and modulates oncogenic signaling cascades, it has emerged as a potential chemotherapeutic target. Many molecules have been identified as KIFC1 inhibitors because of their centrosome declustering activity in cancer cells. Despite the ever‐increasing literature in this field, there have been few efforts to review the progress. The current review aims to collate and present an in‐depth analysis of known KIFC1 inhibitors and their biological activities. Additionally, we present computational docking data of putative KIFC1 inhibitors with their binding sites and binding affinities. This first‐of‐kind comparative analysis involving experimental biology, chemistry, and computational docking of different KIFC1 inhibitors may help guide decision‐making in the selection and design of potent inhibitors. Highlights: First‐of‐its‐kind computational benchmarking of all known KIFC1 inhibitors against all proposed binding sites using the most resolved KIFC1 structural informationComprehensive review of the putative KIFC1 inhibitors reported to date in the literatureDetailed analysis of the evolving biological profiles of each inhibitor chemotypeIdentification of the challenges in this development of KIFC1 inhibitors [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An increase in centrosome number is commonly observed in cancer cells, but the role centrosome amplification plays along with how and when it occurs during cancer development is unclear. One mechanism for generating cancer cells with extra centrosomes is whole genome doubling (WGD), an event that occurs in over 30% of human cancers and is associated with poor survival. Newly formed tetraploid cells can acquire extra centrosomes during WGD, and a generally accepted model proposes that centrosome amplification in tetraploid cells promotes cancer progression by generating aneuploidy and chromosomal instability. Recent findings, however, indicate that newly formed tetraploid cells in vitro lose their extra centrosomes to prevent multipolar cell divisions. Rather than persistent centrosome amplification, this evidence raises the possibility that it may be advantageous for tetraploid cells to initially restore centrosome number homeostasis and for a fraction of the population to reacquire additional centrosomes in the later stages of cancer evolution. In this review, we explore the different evolutionary paths available to newly formed tetraploid cells, their effects on centrosome and chromosome number distribution in daughter cells, and their probabilities of long-term survival. We then discuss the mechanisms that may alter centrosome and chromosome numbers in tetraploid cells and their relevance to cancer progression following WGD.

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known human lung carcinogen with widespread exposure in environmental and occupational settings. Despite well-known cancer risks, the molecular mechanisms of Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis are not well understood, but a major driver of Cr(VI) carcinogenesis is chromosome instability. Previously, we reported Cr(VI) induced numerical chromosome instability, premature centriole disengagement, centrosome amplification, premature centromere division, and spindle assembly checkpoint bypass. A key regulator of these events is securin, which acts by regulating the cleavage ability of separase. Thus, in this study we investigated securin disruption by Cr(VI) exposure. We exposed human lung cells to a particulate Cr(VI) compound, zinc chromate, for acute (24 h) and prolonged (120 h) time points. We found prolonged Cr(VI) exposure caused marked decrease in securin levels and function. After prolonged exposure at the highest concentration, securin protein levels were decreased to 15.3% of control cells, while securin mRNA quantification was 7.9% relative to control cells. Additionally, loss of securin function led to increased separase activity manifested as enhanced cleavage of separase substrates; separase, kendrin, and SCC1. These data show securin is targeted by prolonged Cr(VI) exposure in human lung cells. Thus, a new mechanistic model for Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis emerges with centrosome and centromere disruption as key components of numerical chromosome instability, a key driver in Cr(VI) carcinogenesis.

The centrosome is involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization during interphase and in mitotic spindle assembly during cell division. Centrosome amplification (abnormal proliferation of centrosome number) has been observed in several types of cancer and in precancerous conditions. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanism of centrosome amplification in order to understand the early stage of carcinogenesis. Primary cells could be used to better understand the early stage of carcinogenesis rather than immortalized cells, which tend to have various genetic and epigenetic changes. Previously, we demonstrated that a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, 3-aminobenzamide (3AB), which is known to be nontoxic and nonmutagenic, could induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy in CHO-K1 cells. In this study, we compared primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and immortalized MEF using 3AB. Although centrosome amplification was induced with 3AB treatment in immortalized MEF, a more potent PARP inhibitor, AG14361, was required for primary MEF. However, after centrosome amplification, neither 3AB in immortalized MEF nor AG14361 in primary MEF caused chromosomal aneuploidy, suggesting that further genetic and/or epigenetic change(s) are required to exhibit aneuploidy. The DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin and γ-irradiation can cause cancer and centrosome amplification in experimental animals. Although doxorubicin and γ-irradiation induced centrosome amplification and led to decreased p27Kip protein levels in immortalized MEF and primary MEF, the phosphorylation ratio of nucleophosmin (Thr199) increased in immortalized MEF, whereas it decreased in primary MEF. These results suggest that there exists a yet unidentified pathway, different from the nucleophosmin phosphorylation pathway, which can cause centrosome amplification in primary MEF.

Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer in adults. Whilst treatment of primary UM (PUM) is often successful, around 50% of patients develop metastatic disease with poor outcomes, linked to chromosome 3 loss (monosomy 3, M3). Advances in understanding UM cell biology may indicate new therapeutic options. We report that UM exhibits centrosome abnormalities, which in other cancers are associated with increased invasiveness and worse prognosis, but also represent a potential Achilles' heel for cancer‐specific therapeutics. Analysis of 75 PUM patient samples revealed both higher centrosome numbers and an increase in centrosomes with enlarged pericentriolar matrix (PCM) compared to surrounding normal tissue, both indicative of centrosome amplification. The PCM phenotype was significantly associated with M3 (t‐test, p

Simple Summary: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common form of cancer in children. Current treatments deliver a high survival rate, but often cause harmful and enduring side effects. New treatments are needed to address this clinical challenge and reduce relapse and long-term effects in children. This study investigates the centrosome clustering pathway as a target for cancer treatments in children with B-ALL. Cancer cells often have enlarged or extra centrosomes and require the centrosome clustering pathway to progress through cell division successfully. Our data reveals that when the centrosome clustering pathway is disrupted in B-ALL cells it causes cell death and produces a population of damaged refractory cells. The refractory cells have markers that make them more visible to the immune system and are therefore more easily targeted by immune-based therapies. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common form of cancer in children, with most cases arising from fetal B cell precursor, termed B-ALL. Here, we use immunofluorescence analysis of B-ALL cells to identify centrosome amplification events that require the centrosome clustering pathway to successfully complete mitosis. Our data reveals that primary human B-ALL cells and immortal B-ALL cell lines from both human and mouse sources show defective bipolar spindle formation, abnormal mitotic progression, and cell death following treatment with centrosome clustering inhibitors (CCI). We demonstrate that CCI-refractory B-ALL cells exhibit markers for increased genomic instability, including DNA damage and micronuclei, as well as activation of the cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS)-nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling pathway. Our analysis of cGAS knock-down B-ALL clones implicates cGAS in the sensitivity of B-ALL cells to CCI treatment. Due to its integral function and specificity to cancer cells, the centrosome clustering pathway presents a powerful molecular target for cancer treatment while mitigating the risk to healthy cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes not only increases the risk for cancer but also promotes cancer metastasis. Centrosome amplification (CA) is sufficient to initiate tumorigenesis and can enhance the invasion potential of cancer cells. We have reported that diabetes can induce CA, with diabetic pathophysiological factors as the triggers, which involves the signaling of nucleophosmin (NPM). Thus, CA can serve as a candidate biological link between diabetes and cancer. In the present study, we attempted to identify the NPM binding partners and investigated whether the binding between NPM and its partner mediated the CA. We confirmed that high glucose, insulin, and palmitic acid cancer could elicit CA in the HCT16 colon cancer cells and found that the experimental treatment increased the binding between NPM and H2B, but not between p‐NPM and H2B. The molecular docking analysis supported the fact that NPM and H2B could bind to each other through various amino acid residues. The treatment also increased the colocalization of NPM and H2B in the cytosol. Importantly, disruption of the NPM1–H2B complex by individual knockdown of the protein level of NPM or H2B led to the inhibition of the treatment‐evoked CA. In conclusion, our results suggest that the binding between NPM and H2B proteins signals for the CA by high glucose, insulin, and palmitic acid. Significance statement: Diabetes is increasingly recognized as a significant risk factor for cancer initiation and progression. Amplification of the centrosome is sufficient to induce carcinogenesis and can increase cancer cell invasion potential. Previous research has demonstrated that diabetic pathophysiological factors can cause centrosome amplification (CA) in both noncancerous and malignant colon cells. As a result, we suspect CA is a molecular relationship between diabetes and cancer. However, the mechanism behind this association between diabetes and cancer remains unknown. In the current study, we discovered that the interaction between nucleophosmin (NPM) and H2B caused diabetes‐associated CA, providing a target for decreasing diabetes‐associated CA and allowing us to investigate its functions in carcinogenesis and cancer cell metastasis. Our findings also show that H2B has a biological purpose other than nucleosome construction and gene transcription control in the nucleus, which is signaling for CA in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, the identification of the binding between NPM and H2B, but not phosphorylated NPM and H2B, as a signal for CA adds a new piece of information in the regulation of centrosome homeostasis, which could lead to a new method of cancer treatment by targeting CA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Centrosome amplification (CA) refers to a numerical increase in centrosomes resulting in cells with more than two centrosomes. CA has been shown to initiate tumorigenesis and increase the invasive potential of cancer cells in genetically modified experimental models. Hexavalent chromium is a recognized carcinogen that causes CA and tumorigenesis as well as promotes cancer metastasis. Thus, CA appears to be a biological link between chromium and cancer. In the present study, we investigated how chromium triggers CA. Our results showed that a subtoxic concentration of chromium‐induced CA in HCT116 colon cancer cells, resulted in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activated ATF6 without causing endoplasmic reticulum stress, and upregulated the protein level of PLK4. Inhibition of ROS production, ATF6 activation, or PLK4 upregulation attenuated CA. Inhibition of ROS using N‐acetyl‐l‐cysteine (NAC) inhibited chromium‐induced activation of ATF6 and upregulation of PLK4. ATF6‐specific siRNA knocked down the protein level and activation of ATF6, and upregulated PLK4, with no effect on ROS production. Knockdown of PLK4 protein had no effect on chromium‐induced ROS production or activation of ATF6. In conclusion, our results suggest that hexavalent chromium induces CA via the ROS‐ATF6‐PLK4 pathway and provides molecular targets for inhibiting chromium‐mediated CA, which may be useful for the assessment of CA in chromium‐promoted tumorigenesis and cancer cell metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer in adults. Whilst treatment of primary UM (PUM) is often successful, around 50% of patients develop metastatic disease with poor outcomes, linked to chromosome 3 loss (monosomy 3, M3). Advances in understanding UM cell biology may indicate new therapeutic options. We report that UM exhibits centrosome abnormalities, which in other cancers are associated with increased invasiveness and worse prognosis, but also represent a potential Achilles' heel for cancer‐specific therapeutics. Analysis of 75 PUM patient samples revealed both higher centrosome numbers and an increase in centrosomes with enlarged pericentriolar matrix (PCM) compared to surrounding normal tissue, both indicative of centrosome amplification. The PCM phenotype was significantly associated with M3 (t‐test, p < 0.01). Centrosomes naturally enlarge as cells approach mitosis; however, whilst UM with higher mitotic scores had enlarged PCM regardless of genetic status, the PCM phenotype remained significantly associated with M3 in UM with low mitotic scores (ANOVA, p = 0.021) suggesting that this is independent of proliferation. Phenotypic analysis of patient‐derived cultures and established UM lines revealed comparable levels of centrosome amplification in PUM cells to archetypal triple‐negative breast cancer cell lines, whilst metastatic UM (MUM) cell lines had even higher levels. Importantly, many UM cells also exhibit centrosome clustering, a common strategy employed by other cancer cells with centrosome amplification to survive cell division. As UM samples with M3 display centrosome abnormalities indicative of amplification, this phenotype may contribute to the development of MUM, suggesting that centrosome de‐clustering drugs may provide a novel therapeutic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Centrosome amplification is a common feature of human tumors, but whether this is a cause or a consequence of cancer remains unclear. Here, we test the consequence of centrosome amplification by creating mice in which centrosome number can be chronically increased in the absence of additional genetic defects. We show that increasing centrosome number elevated tumor initiation in a mouse model of intestinal neoplasia. Most importantly, we demonstrate that supernumerary centrosomes are sufficient to drive aneuploidy and the development of spontaneous tumors in multiple tissues. Tumors arising from centrosome amplification exhibit frequent mitotic errors and possess complex karyotypes, recapitulating a common feature of human cancer. Together, our data support a direct causal relationship among centrosome amplification, genomic instability, and tumor development.

Obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) is a binding protein of Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), germline pathogenic variants of which cause hereditary breast cancer. Cancer-associated variants of BRCA1 and OLA1 are deficient in the regulation of centrosome number. Although OLA1 might function as a tumor suppressor, the relevance of OLA1 deficiency to carcinogenesis is unclear. Here, we generated Ola1 knockout mice. Aged female Ola1 +/− mice developed lymphoproliferative diseases, including malignant lymphoma. The lymphoma tissues had low expression of Ola1 and an increase in the number of cells with centrosome amplification. Interestingly, the proportion of cells with centrosome amplification in normal spleen from Ola1 +/− mice was higher in male mice than in female mice. In human cells, estrogen stimulation attenuated centrosome amplification induced by OLA1 knockdown. Previous reports indicate that prominent centrosome amplification causes cell death but does not promote tumorigenesis. Thus, in the current study, the mild centrosome amplification observed under estrogen stimulation in Ola1 +/− female mice is likely more tumorigenic than the prominent centrosome amplification observed in Ola1 +/− male mice. Our findings provide a possible sex-dependent mechanism of the tumor suppressor function of OLA1. [Display omitted] • Ola1 heterozygous knockout promotes tumorigenesis of lymphoma in aged female mice. • Decreased expression of Ola1 correlates with centrosome amplification in tumors. • Estrogen stimulation suppresses the centrosome amplification induced by Ola1 deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer cells are known to have chromosomal number abnormalities (aneuploidy), a hallmark of malignant tumors. Cancer cells also have an increased number of centrosomes (centrosome amplification). Paradoxically, cancer therapies, including γ-irradiation and some anticancer drugs, are carcinogenic and can induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy. Thus, the processes of carcinogenesis and killing cancer cells might have some mechanisms in common. Previously, we found that the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation, a post-translational modification of proteins, caused centrosome amplification. However, the mechanism of action of the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation is not fully understood. In this study, we found that an inhibitor of polyADP-ribosylation, 3-aminobenzamide, caused centrosome amplification, as well as aneuploidy of chromosomes in CHO-K1 cells. Moreover, inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation inhibited AKT phosphorylation, and inhibitors of AKT phosphorylation inhibited polyADP-ribosylation, suggesting the involvement of polyADP-ribosylation in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway for controlling cell proliferation. Our data suggest a possibility for developing drugs that induce centrosome amplification and aneuploidy for therapeutic applications to clinical cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aberrated PLK4 expression has been reported in different malignancies and causes centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and genomic instability. However, the mechanism by which PLK4 is regulated in carcinogenesis remains not fully characterised. Here, we showed that PLK4 was overexpressed in human HCC and overexpression of PLK4 predicted poorer patient prognosis. Unexpectedly, we found that induced expression of PLK4 promotes, but knockdown of PLK4 inhibits, HCC cell migration and invasion. Mechanistically, we found that TEC tyrosine kinase, which also promotes HCC cell migration, stabilizes PLK4 by phosphorylation. TEC directly phosphorylates PLK4 at tyrosine 86 residue, which not only stabilizes the protein but also enhances PLK4-mediated HCC cell invasion. Further investigation by transcriptome sequencing indicated that PLK4 promotes the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase to regulate the focal adhesion pathway in HCC cell migration. Taken together, our results demonstrated that PLK4 plays an important role in HCC metastasis and revealed for the first time the mechanism by which PLK4 promotes HCC metastasis via TEC phosphorylation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Centrosome amplification (CA) is a common phenomenon in cancer, promotes genomic stability and cancer evolution, and has been reported to promote metastasis. CA promotes a stochastic gain/loss of chromosomes during cell division, known as chromosomal instability (CIN). However, it is unclear whether CA is present in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), the seeds for metastasis. Here, we surveyed CA in CTCs from human subjects with metastatic breast cancer. CTCs were captured by CD45 exclusion and selection of EpCAM‐positive cells using an exclusion‐based sample preparation technology platform known as VERSA (versatile exclusion‐based rare sample analysis). Centriole amplification (centrin foci> 4) is the definitive assay for CA. However, determination of centrin foci is technically challenging and incompatible with automated analysis. To test if the more technically accessible centrosome marker pericentrin could serve as a surrogate for centriole amplification in CTCs, cells were stained with pericentrin and centrin antibodies to evaluate CA. This assay was first validated using breast cancer cell lines and a nontransformed epithelial cell line model of inducible CA, then translated to CTCs. Pericentrin area and pericentrin area x intensity correlate well with centrin foci, validating pericentrin as a surrogate marker of CA. CA is found in CTCs from 75% of subjects, with variability in the percentage and extent of CA in individual circulating cells in a given subject, similar to the variability previously seen in primary tumors and cell lines. In summary, we created, validated, and implemented a novel method to assess CA in CTCs from subjects with metastatic breast cancer. Such an assay will be useful for longitudinal monitoring of CA in cancer patients and in prospective clinical trials for assessing the impact of CA on response to therapy.

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers that facilitate bipolar mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. Recognizing that centrosome amplification is a common feature of aneuploid cancer cells, we tested whether supernumerary centrosomes are sufficient to drive tumor development. To do this, we constructed and analyzed mice in which centrosome amplification can be induced by a Cre-recombinase-mediated increase in expression of Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Elevated Plk4 in mouse fibroblasts produced supernumerary centrosomes and enhanced the expected mitotic errors, but proliferation continued only after inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Increasing Plk4 levels in mice with functional p53 produced centrosome amplification in liver and skin, but this did not promote spontaneous tumor development in these tissues or enhance the growth of chemically induced skin tumors. In the absence of p53, Plk4 overexpression generated widespread centrosome amplification, but did not drive additional tumors or affect development of the fatal thymic lymphomas that arise in animals lacking p53. We conclude that, independent of p53 status, supernumerary centrosomes are not sufficient to drive tumor formation.

As nucleators of the mitotic spindle and primary cilium, centrosomes play crucial roles in equal segregation of DNA content to daughter cells, coordination of growth and differentiation, and transduction of homeostatic cues. Whereas the majority of mammalian cells carry no more than two centrosomes per cell, exceptions to this rule apply in certain specialized tissues and in select disease states, including cancer. Centrosome amplification, or the condition of having more than two centrosomes per cell, has been suggested to contribute to instability of chromosomes, imbalance in asymmetric divisions, and reorganization of tissue architecture; however, the degree to which these conditions are a direct cause of or simply a consequence of human disease is poorly understood. Here we addressed this issue by generating a mouse model inducing centrosome amplification in a naturally proliferative epithelial tissue by elevating Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4) expression in the skin epidermis. By altering centrosome numbers, we observed multiciliated cells, spindle orientation errors, and chromosome segregation defects within developing epidermis. None of these defects was sufficient to impart a proliferative advantage within the tissue, however. Rather, impaired mitoses led to p53-mediated cell death and contributed to defective growth and stratification. Despite these abnormalities, mice remained viable and healthy, although epidermal cells with centrosome amplification were still appreciable. Moreover, these abnormalities were insufficient to disrupt homeostasis and initiate or enhance tumorigenesis, underscoring the powerful surveillance mechanisms in the skin.

Polo-like kinases (Plks) are critical regulatory molecules during the cell cycle process. This family has five members: Plk1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Plk4 has been identified as a master regulator of centriole replication, and its aberrant expression is closely associated with cancer development. In this review, we depict the DNA, mRNA, and protein structure of Plk4, and the regulation of Plk4 at a molecular level. Then we list the downstream targets of Plk4 and the hallmarks of cancer associated with these targets. The role of Plk4 in different cancers is also summarized. Finally, we review the inhibitors that target Plk4 in the hope of discovering effective anticancer drugs. From authors’ perspective, Plk4 might represent a valuable tumor biomarker and critical target for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Alterations in breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), a tumor suppressor gene, increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 forms a heterodimer with BRCA1‐associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) and functions in multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair and centrosome regulation. BRCA1 acts as a tumor suppressor by promoting homologous recombination (HR) repair, and alterations in BRCA1 cause HR deficiency, not only in breast and ovarian tissues but also in other tissues. The molecular mechanisms underlying BRCA1 alteration‐induced carcinogenesis remain unclear. Centrosomes are the major microtubule‐organizing centers and function in bipolar spindle formation. The regulation of centrosome number is critical for chromosome segregation in mitosis, which maintains genomic stability. BRCA1/BARD1 function in centrosome regulation together with Obg‐like ATPase (OLA1) and receptor for activating protein C kinase 1 (RACK1). Cancer‐derived variants of BRCA1, BARD1, OLA1, and RACK1 do not interact, and aberrant expression of these proteins results in abnormal centrosome duplication in mammary‐derived cells, and rarely in other cell types. RACK1 is involved in centriole duplication in the S phase by promoting polo‐like kinase 1 activation by Aurora A, which is critical for centrosome duplication. Centriole number is higher in cells derived from mammary tissues compared with in those derived from other tissues, suggesting that tissue‐specific centrosome characterization may shed light on the tissue specificity of BRCA1‐associated carcinogenesis. Here, we explored the role of the BRCA1‐containing complex in centrosome regulation and the effect of its deficiency on tissue‐specific carcinogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Polo-like kinases (Plks) are critical regulatory molecules during the cell cycle process. This family has five members: Plk1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Plk4 has been identified as a master regulator of centriole replication, and its aberrant expression is closely associated with cancer development. In this review, we depict the DNA, mRNA, and protein structure of Plk4, and the regulation of Plk4 at a molecular level. Then we list the downstream targets of Plk4 and the hallmarks of cancer associated with these targets. The role of Plk4 in different cancers is also summarized. Finally, we review the inhibitors that target Plk4 in the hope of discovering effective anticancer drugs. From authors' perspective, Plk4 might represent a valuable tumor biomarker and critical target for cancer diagnosis and therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerical and/or structural centrosome amplification (CA) is a hallmark of cancers that is often associated with the aberrant tumor karyotypes and poor clinical outcomes. Mechanistically, CA compromises mitotic fidelity and leads to chromosome instability (CIN), which underlies tumor initiation and progression. Recent technological advances in microscopy and image analysis platforms have enabled better-than-ever detection and quantification of centrosomal aberrancies in cancer. Numerous studies have thenceforth correlated the presence and the degree of CA with indicators of poor prognosis such as higher tumor grade and ability to recur and metastasize. We have pioneered a novel semi-automated pipeline that integrates immunofluorescence confocal microscopy with digital image analysis to yield a quantitative centrosome amplification score (CAS), which is a summation of the severity and frequency of structural and numerical centrosome aberrations in tumor samples. Recent studies in breast cancer show that CA increases across the disease progression continuum, while normal breast tissue exhibited the lowest CA, followed by cancer-adjacent apparently normal, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive tumors, which showed the highest CA. This finding strengthens the notion that CA could be evolutionarily favored and can promote tumor progression and metastasis. In this review, we discuss the prevalence, extent, and severity of CA in various solid cancer types, the utility of quantifying amplified centrosomes as an independent prognostic marker. We also highlight the clinical feasibility of a CA-based risk score for predicting recurrence, metastasis, and overall prognosis in patients with solid cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Centrosome amplification (CA) is a common feature of human tumors, but it is not clear whether this is a cause or a consequence of cancer. The centrosome amplification observed in tumor cells may be explained by a series of events, such as failure of cell division, dysregulation of centrosome cycle checkpoints, and de novo centriole biogenesis disorder. The formation and progression of breast cancer are characterized by genomic abnormality. The centrosomes in breast cancer cells show characteristic structural aberrations, caused by centrosome amplification, which include: an increase in the number and volume of centrosomes, excessive increase of pericentriolar material (PCM), inappropriate phosphorylation of centrosomal molecular, and centrosome clustering formation induced by the dysregulation of important genes. The mechanism of intracellular centrosome amplification, the impact of which on breast cancer and the latest breast cancer target treatment options for centrosome amplification are exhaustively elaborated in this review.

Cancer cells are known to have chromosomal number abnormalities (aneuploidy), a hallmark of malignant tumors. Cancer cells also have an increased number of centrosomes (centrosome amplification). Paradoxically, cancer therapies, including γ-irradiation and some anticancer drugs, are carcinogenic and can induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy. Thus, the processes of carcinogenesis and killing cancer cells might have some mechanisms in common. Previously, we found that the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation, a post-translational modification of proteins, caused centrosome amplification. However, the mechanism of action of the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation is not fully understood. In this study, we found that an inhibitor of polyADP-ribosylation, 3-aminobenzamide, caused centrosome amplification, as well as aneuploidy of chromosomes in CHO-K1 cells. Moreover, inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation inhibited AKT phosphorylation, and inhibitors of AKT phosphorylation inhibited polyADP-ribosylation, suggesting the involvement of polyADP-ribosylation in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway for controlling cell proliferation. Our data suggest a possibility for developing drugs that induce centrosome amplification and aneuploidy for therapeutic applications to clinical cancer.

Aneuploidy, an abnormal chromosome number, is a hallmark of cancer. We recently showed that depletion of microtubule-associated protein ATIP3 (AT2 receptor-interacting protein 3) induces aneuploidy and sensitizes breast cancer cells to taxanes. Combining taxane treatment with ATIP3 depletion cooperates to reach a detrimental level of aneuploidy.

Estrogens are associated with a variety of diseases and play important roles in tumor development and progression. Centrosome defects are hallmarks of human cancers and contribute to ongoing chromosome missegragation and aneuploidy that manifest in genomic instability and tumor progression. Although several mechanisms underlie the etiology of centrosome aberrations in human cancer, upstream regulators are hardly known. Accumulating experimental and clinical evidence points to an important role of estrogens in deregulating centrosome homeostasis and promoting karyotype instability. Here, we will summarize existing literature of how natural and synthetic estrogens might contribute to structural and numerical centrosome defects, genomic instability and human carcinogenesis.

Abstract Background Development of distant metastases involves a complex multistep biological process termed the invasion-metastasis cascade, which includes dissemination of cancer cells from the primary tumor to secondary organs. NOTCH developmental signaling plays a critical role in promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, tumor stemness, and metastasis. Although all four NOTCH receptors show oncogenic properties, the unique role of each of these receptors in the sequential stepwise events that typify the invasion-metastasis cascade remains elusive. Methods We have established metastatic xenografts expressing high endogenous levels of NOTCH3 using estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) MCF-7 breast cancer cells with constitutive active Raf-1/mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling (vMCF-7Raf-1) and MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. The critical role of NOTCH3 in inducing an invasive phenotype and poor outcome was corroborated in unique TNBC cells resulting from a patient-derived brain metastasis (TNBC-M25) and in publicly available claudin-low breast tumor specimens collected from participants in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium database. Results In this study, we identified an association between NOTCH3 expression and development of metastases in ERα+ and TNBC models. ERα+ breast tumor xenografts with a constitutive active Raf-1/MAPK signaling developed spontaneous lung metastases through the clonal expansion of cancer cells expressing a NOTCH3 reprogramming network. Abrogation of NOTCH3 expression significantly reduced the self-renewal and invasive capacity of ex vivo breast cancer cells, restoring a luminal CD44low/CD24high/ERαhigh phenotype. Forced expression of the mitotic Aurora kinase A (AURKA), which promotes breast cancer metastases, failed to restore the invasive capacity of NOTCH3-null cells, demonstrating that NOTCH3 expression is required for an invasive phenotype. Likewise, pharmacologic inhibition of NOTCH signaling also impaired TNBC cell seeding and metastatic growth. Significantly, the role of aberrant NOTCH3 expression in promoting tumor self-renewal, invasiveness, and poor outcome was corroborated in unique TNBC cells from a patient-derived brain metastasis and in publicly available claudin-low breast tumor specimens. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the key role of NOTCH3 oncogenic signaling in the genesis of breast cancer metastasis and provide a compelling preclinical rationale for the design of novel therapeutic strategies that will selectively target NOTCH3 to halt metastatic seeding and to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer.

Background/Aims: Type 2 diabetes is associated with oxidative stress and DNA damage which can cause centrosome amplification. Thus, the study investigated centrosome amplification in type 2 diabetes and the underlying mechanisms. Methods: Centrosome numbers in human peripheral blood mononuclear blood cells (PBMC) from healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes were compared to access the association between type 2 diabetes and centrosome amplification. Colon cancer cells were used to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the centrosome amplification triggered by high glucose, insulin and palmitic acid. Western blot analysis was used to quantify the level of protein and protein phosphorylation. Immunofluorescent staining was performed to detect centrosomes. ROS was quantified using flow cytometry technique. Transcriptpmic profiling was performed using Illumina HiSeqTM500 platform. Results: We found that centrosome amplification was increased PBMC from the type 2 diabetic patients, which correlated with the levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c. High glucose, insulin and palmitic acid, alone or in combinations, induced ROS production and centrosome amplification. Together, they increased AKT activation as well as the expression, binding and centrosome translation of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ. Results from further analyses showed that AKT-ROS-dependent upregulations of expression, binding and centrosome translocation of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ was the molecular pathway underlying the centrosome amplification in vitro triggered by high glucose, insulin and palmitic acid. Moreover, the key in vitro molecular signalling events activated by high glucose, insulin and palmitic acid were verified in PBMC from the patients with type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: Our results show that type 2 diabetes promotes cell centrosome amplification, and suggest that the diabetic pathophysiological factors-activated AKT-ROS-dependent signalling of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ is the underlying molecular mechanism.

Centrosome amplification (CA) is a common phenomenon in cancer, promotes genomic stability and cancer evolution, and has been reported to promote metastasis. CA promotes a stochastic gain/loss of chromosomes during cell division, known as chromosomal instability (CIN). However, it is unclear whether CA is present in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), the seeds for metastasis. Here, we surveyed CA in CTCs from human subjects with metastatic breast cancer. CTCs were captured by CD45 exclusion and selection of EpCAM‐positive cells using an exclusion‐based sample preparation technology platform known as VERSA (versatile exclusion‐based rare sample analysis). Centriole amplification (centrin foci> 4) is the definitive assay for CA. However, determination of centrin foci is technically challenging and incompatible with automated analysis. To test if the more technically accessible centrosome marker pericentrin could serve as a surrogate for centriole amplification in CTCs, cells were stained with pericentrin and centrin antibodies to evaluate CA. This assay was first validated using breast cancer cell lines and a nontransformed epithelial cell line model of inducible CA, then translated to CTCs. Pericentrin area and pericentrin area x intensity correlate well with centrin foci, validating pericentrin as a surrogate marker of CA. CA is found in CTCs from 75% of subjects, with variability in the percentage and extent of CA in individual circulating cells in a given subject, similar to the variability previously seen in primary tumors and cell lines. In summary, we created, validated, and implemented a novel method to assess CA in CTCs from subjects with metastatic breast cancer. Such an assay will be useful for longitudinal monitoring of CA in cancer patients and in prospective clinical trials for assessing the impact of CA on response to therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The abysmal success rate of anticancer drugs in clinical trials, is in part, attributable to discordance between cultured cancer cells and patient tumors. While tumors in vivo, display a lower mitotic index, patient tumors portray much higher centrosomal aberrations, relative to in vitro cultured cells. The microenvironment too differs considerably between the in vitro and in vivo scenarios. Notably, another hallmark of cancer, hypoxia, is not recapitulated in cell lines cultured under normoxic conditions. These observations raise the possibility that hypoxia may be the missing link that explains the discordance between cell biological phenomena in vitro versus physiological conditions. Further, the interplay between hypoxia and centrosome amplification (CA) is relatively understudied. Recent research from our laboratory, geared toward examining the biological link between the two, has uncovered that hypoxia induces the expression of proteins (Plk4, Aurora A, Cyclin D) implicated in CA, in a hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α (HIF‐1α)‐dependent context. Our studies evidence that hypoxia fuels CA that underlie intratumoral heterogeneity and metastatic potential of cancer cells. Given the advent of HIF‐1α inhibitors, this research has ramifications in aiding patient risk stratification and designing new cancer drug therapies to facilitate clinical decision‐making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We recently published that type 2 diabetes promotes cell centrosome amplification via upregulation of Rho-associated protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) and 14-3-3 protein-σ (14-3-3σ). This study further investigates the molecular mechanisms underlying diabetes-associated centrosome amplification. We found that treatment of cells with high glucose, insulin, and palmitic acid levels increased the intracellular and extracellular protein levels of Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 6 (Wnt6) as well as the cellular level of β-catenin. The treatment also activated &#946-;catenin and promoted its nuclear translocation. Treatment of cells with siRNA species for Wnt6, Frizzled-4 (FZD4), or β-catenin as well as introduction of antibodies against Wnt6 or FZD4 to the cell culture medium could all attenuate the treatment-triggered centrosome amplification. Moreover, we showed that secreted Wnt6-FZD4-β-catenin was the signaling pathway that was upstream of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ. We found that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) were also able to increase the cellular and extracellular levels of Wnt6, the cellular protein level of β-catenin, and centrosome amplification. Treatment of the cells with siRNA species for Wnt6 or FZD4 as well as introduction of antibodies against Wnt6 or FZD4 to the cell culture could all inhibit the AGEs-elicited centrosome amplification. In colon tissues from a diabetic mouse model, the protein levels of Wnt6 and 14-3-3σ were increased. In conclusion, our results showed that the pathophysiological factors in type 2 diabetes, including AGEs, were able to induce centrosome amplification. It is suggested that secreted Wnt6 binds to FZD4 to activate the canonical Wnt6 signaling pathway, which is upstream of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ, and that this is the cell signaling pathway underlying diabetes-associated centrosome amplification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Of the 18 canine malignant tumor cell lines examined, 15 showed aneuploidy. • Of the 15 aneuploid cell lines, 5 showed centrosome amplification (CA). • DNA aneuploidy in canine tumor cells might be partly due to CA. DNA aneuploidy, the altered DNA content of a cell, is a common feature of canine tumors. However, it is unclear whether aneuploid DNA in canine tumor cells show centrosome amplification (CA), which contributes to numerical and structural chromosome aberrations that result in DNA aneuploidy. Here, we evaluated whether DNA aneuploidy and CA occur concurrently in canine tumor cell lines. Centrosome numbers were evaluated in 18 canine tumor cell lines by immunocytochemistry with anti-γ-tubulin antibody, and DNA content was evaluated by flow cytometry using propidium iodide. A total of 15 cell lines showed DNA aneuploidy, and CA was observed in 5 of these 15 cell lines. Together, our results suggest that DNA aneuploidy in canine tumor cells might be explained at least in part by CA. In addition, cell lines with CA may be useful tools to examine the detailed relationship between CA and DNA aneuploidy and the molecular mechanism of CA in canine tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The centrosome is involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization during interphase and in mitotic spindle assembly during cell division. Centrosome amplification (abnormal proliferation of centrosome number) has been observed in several types of cancer and in precancerous conditions. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanism of centrosome amplification in order to understand the early stage of carcinogenesis. Primary cells could be used to better understand the early stage of carcinogenesis rather than immortalized cells, which tend to have various genetic and epigenetic changes. Previously, we demonstrated that a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, 3-aminobenzamide (3AB), which is known to be nontoxic and nonmutagenic, could induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy in CHO-K1 cells. In this study, we compared primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and immortalized MEF using 3AB. Although centrosome amplification was induced with 3AB treatment in immortalized MEF, a more potent PARP inhibitor, AG14361, was required for primary MEF. However, after centrosome amplification, neither 3AB in immortalized MEF nor AG14361 in primary MEF caused chromosomal aneuploidy, suggesting that further genetic and/or epigenetic change(s) are required to exhibit aneuploidy. The DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin and γ-irradiation can cause cancer and centrosome amplification in experimental animals. Although doxorubicin and γ-irradiation induced centrosome amplification and led to decreased p27Kip protein levels in immortalized MEF and primary MEF, the phosphorylation ratio of nucleophosmin (Thr199) increased in immortalized MEF, whereas it decreased in primary MEF. These results suggest that there exists a yet unidentified pathway, different from the nucleophosmin phosphorylation pathway, which can cause centrosome amplification in primary MEF.

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known human lung carcinogen with widespread exposure in environmental and occupational settings. Despite well-known cancer risks, the molecular mechanisms of Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis are not well understood, but a major driver of Cr(VI) carcinogenesis is chromosome instability. Previously, we reported Cr(VI) induced numerical chromosome instability, premature centriole disengagement, centrosome amplification, premature centromere division, and spindle assembly checkpoint bypass. A key regulator of these events is securin, which acts by regulating the cleavage ability of separase. Thus, in this study we investigated securin disruption by Cr(VI) exposure. We exposed human lung cells to a particulate Cr(VI) compound, zinc chromate, for acute (24 h) and prolonged (120 h) time points. We found prolonged Cr(VI) exposure caused marked decrease in securin levels and function. After prolonged exposure at the highest concentration, securin protein levels were decreased to 15.3% of control cells, while securin mRNA quantification was 7.9% relative to control cells. Additionally, loss of securin function led to increased separase activity manifested as enhanced cleavage of separase substrates; separase, kendrin, and SCC1. These data show securin is targeted by prolonged Cr(VI) exposure in human lung cells. Thus, a new mechanistic model for Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis emerges with centrosome and centromere disruption as key components of numerical chromosome instability, a key driver in Cr(VI) carcinogenesis.