Search

The functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) assesses Gait, Stance, Sitting, and Speech. It was developed as a potentially clinically meaningful measure of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) progression for clinical trial use. Here, we evaluated content validity of the f-SARA. Qualitative interviews were conducted among individuals with SCA1 (n = 1) and SCA3 (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (USA, n = 5; Europe, n = 3). Interviews evaluated symptoms and signs of SCA and relevance of f-SARA concepts for SCA. HCP cognitive debriefing was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by ATLAS.TI software. Individuals with SCA1 and 3 reported 85 symptoms, signs, and impacts of SCA. All indicated difficulties with walking, stance, balance, speech, fatigue, emotions, and work. All individuals with SCA1 and 3 considered Gait, Stance, and Speech relevant f-SARA concepts; 3 considered Sitting relevant (42.9%). All HCPs considered Gait and Speech relevant; 5 (62.5%) indicated Stance was relevant. Sitting was considered a late-stage disease indicator. Most HCPs suggested inclusion of appendicular items would enhance clinical relevance. Cognitive debriefing supported clarity and comprehension of f-SARA. Maintaining current abilities on f-SARA items for 1 year was considered meaningful for most individuals with SCA1 and 3. All HCPs considered meaningful changes as stability in f-SARA score over 1-2 years, 1-2-point change in total f-SARA score, and deviation from natural history. These results support content validity of f-SARA for assessing SCA disease progression in clinical trials.

Purpose: Mapping or matching the items in a clinical outcome assessment (COA) to concepts that define a condition is a common method for evaluating a COA's concept coverage. The purpose of this research was to address the lack of formal guidance for conducting this task by developing a framework for best practices in COA concept mapping and applying it to a case study. Methods: To develop the framework, we examined the literature and created a draft set of best practices which was then reviewed by experienced researchers through focus groups before being finalized. To conduct the case study, we extracted data from a systematic review of knee osteoarthritis (KO) symptoms and impacts and used the framework to map relevant concepts to items in the SF-36v2® Health Survey (SF-36v2). Results: The framework guides researchers in defining the purpose of and data sources for the mapping, establishing guiding principles and decision-making thresholds, and conducting the mapping exercise. The results of the case study demonstrate the usefulness of the framework in identifying 27/36 items (75%) in the SF-36v2 that addressed concepts that define KO. Conclusion: This case study illustrates how the framework for best practices in COA concept mapping may be used, highlighting how establishing clear concept definitions and guiding principles and following a structured process throughout can help produce consistent, reliable, and reproducible results. The results from this rigorous approach can provide valuable evidence to support decisions about the appropriateness of a COA for the intended patient population. Plain English Summary: In health-related quality of life research, mapping items in a clinical outcome assessment (COA) to concepts that define a health condition is one way to evaluate an instrument's content validity (or, how well the instrument addresses the concepts it intends to measure). Without formal guidance on how to do this mapping, researchers can be inconsistent. This article describes the development of a framework for best practices in COA concept mapping. Informed by the literature and input from researchers with expertise in COA development and evaluation, the final framework guides researchers through the mapping process from start to finish, from helping to define the purpose of the task and identify the data sources, to establishing guiding principles and decision-making thresholds, conducting the mapping, and displaying the results. A case study—in which items from the SF-36v2® Health Survey were mapped to concepts from a systematic review of knee osteoarthritis symptoms and impacts—shows the framework in action, demonstrating how following the best practices can lead to consistent results that can support the evaluation of an instrument's content validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The CDKL5 Clinical Severity Assessment (CCSA) is a comprehensive, content‐validated measurement tool capturing the diverse challenges of cyclin‐dependent kinase‐like 5 (CDKL5) deficiency disorder (CDD), a genetically caused developmental epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). The CCSA is divided into clinician‐reported (CCSA‐Clinician) and caregiver‐reported (CCSA‐Caregiver) assessments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factor structure of these measures through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and evaluate their validity and reliability. Methods: Participants were recruited from the International CDKL5 Clinical Research Network to take part in an in‐clinic CCSA‐Clinician evaluation (n = 148) and/or complete the CCSA‐Caregiver questionnaire (n = 198). CFA was used to determine domains, and factor loadings and validity were assessed. For the CCSA‐Clinician, inter‐rater reliability was assessed by nine CDD experienced clinicians via 14 pre‐recorded evaluations. Eight clinicians re‐viewed and re‐scored the videos after 4 weeks to evaluate intra‐rater reliability. The CCSA‐Caregiver was completed on a second occasion by 34 caregivers after 2–4 weeks to assess test–retest reliability. Results: CFA resulted in three domains for the CCSA‐Clinician (motor and movement, communication, vision) and four domains for the CCSA‐Caregiver (seizures, behavior, alertness, feeding), with good item loadings across both measures. Structural statistics, internal consistency, discriminant validity, and reliability were satisfactory for both measures, and scores were consistent between known groups. Significance: This study provides strong evidence that the CCSA measures are suitable to assess the clinical severity of individuals with CDD, supporting their use in clinical trials. Further evaluation of responsiveness to change in a longitudinal assessment is planned. Use may also be appropriate in similar DEEs but would require validation in those populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a distinctive debilitating skin rash and skeletal muscle weakness. It is unclear if existing clinical outcome assessment (COA) measures include the concepts of priority to patients and those necessary to fully capture improvements in the active cutaneous manifestations of DM. This study aimed to develop the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Investigator Global Assessment (CDM-IGA), a de novo IGA, for use in clinical trials of adult DM. Methods Eight DM clinical experts participated in 60-min qualitative interviews consisting of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing methodologies. Concept elicitation comprised open-ended questions with follow-up probes to explore clinicians’ experiences of treating patients with DM, the impact of symptoms on patients’ quality of life, and the severity levels of disease characteristics to explore DM progression. Cognitive debriefing required the clinical experts to perform a review of the CDM-IGA, designed to assess the severity of cutaneous disease activity of DM. After the interviews, a consensus meeting with three clinical experts was held to agree on any outstanding issues relating to the CDM-IGA. Results The CDM-IGA was iteratively developed using the opinions of nine clinical experts. Feedback provided by all clinicians agreed that erythema was the main active cutaneous manifestation of DM and should be the primary characteristic on the CDM-IGA, split by erythema color and extent. To determine cutaneous disease severity, experts suggested adding a metric called secondary changes, which combined erosion/ulceration and lichenification, which could modify the patient’s final score. Three clinical experts suggested that a photo-guide to support assessments of erythema across different skin tones could be beneficial. Conclusions A novel CDM-IGA was developed for use with adult patients with DM in clinical trials, based on an iterative development process that combined qualitative feedback from clinical experts of DM and importantly adult patients living with DM.

Introduction: Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a distinctive debilitating skin rash and skeletal muscle weakness. It is unclear if existing clinical outcome assessment (COA) measures include the concepts of priority to patients and those necessary to fully capture improvements in the active cutaneous manifestations of DM. This study aimed to develop the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Investigator Global Assessment (CDM-IGA), a de novo IGA, for use in clinical trials of adult DM. Methods: Eight DM clinical experts participated in 60-min qualitative interviews consisting of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing methodologies. Concept elicitation comprised open-ended questions with follow-up probes to explore clinicians' experiences of treating patients with DM, the impact of symptoms on patients' quality of life, and the severity levels of disease characteristics to explore DM progression. Cognitive debriefing required the clinical experts to perform a review of the CDM-IGA, designed to assess the severity of cutaneous disease activity of DM. After the interviews, a consensus meeting with three clinical experts was held to agree on any outstanding issues relating to the CDM-IGA. Results: The CDM-IGA was iteratively developed using the opinions of nine clinical experts. Feedback provided by all clinicians agreed that erythema was the main active cutaneous manifestation of DM and should be the primary characteristic on the CDM-IGA, split by erythema color and extent. To determine cutaneous disease severity, experts suggested adding a metric called secondary changes, which combined erosion/ulceration and lichenification, which could modify the patient's final score. Three clinical experts suggested that a photo-guide to support assessments of erythema across different skin tones could be beneficial. Conclusions: A novel CDM-IGA was developed for use with adult patients with DM in clinical trials, based on an iterative development process that combined qualitative feedback from clinical experts of DM and importantly adult patients living with DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire Presbyopia (NAVQ-P) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in a phakic presbyopia population to assess near vision function impacts. The study refined and explored the psychometric properties and score interpretability of the NAVQ-P and additional PRO items assessing near vision correction independence (NVCI), near vision satisfaction (NVS), and near vision correction preference (NVCP). Methods This was a psychometric validation study conducted using PRO data collected as part of a Phase IIb clinical trial (CUN8R44 A2202) consisting of 235 randomized adults with presbyopia from the US, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Data collected at baseline, week 2, and months 1, 2, and 3 during the 3-month trial treatment period were included in the analyses to assess item (question) properties, NAVQ-P dimensionality and scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Results Item responses were distributed across the full response scale for most NAVQ-P and additional PRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the pre-defined unidimensional structure and calculation of a NAVQ-P total score as a measure of near vision function. Item deletion informed by item response distributions, dimensionality analyses, item response theory, and previous qualitative findings, including clinical input, supported retention of 14 NAVQ-P items. The 14-item NAVQ-P total score had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.979) and high test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients > = 0.898). There was good evidence of construct-related validity for all PROs supported by strong correlations with concurrent measures. Excellent results for known-groups validity and ability to detect change analyses were also demonstrated. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods supported interpretation of scores through generation of group-level and within-individual estimates of meaningful change thresholds. A meaningful within-patient change in the range of 8-15-point improvement on the NAVQ-P total score (score range 0–42) was recommended, including a more specific responder definition of 10-point improvement. Conclusions The NAVQ-P, NVCI, and NVS are valid and reliable instruments which have the ability to detect change over time. Findings strongly support the use of these measures as outcome assessments in clinical/research studies and in clinical practice in the presbyopia population.

BackgroundDengue is the most prevalent arboviral infection causing an estimated 50-60 million cases of febrile illness globally per year, exacting considerable disease burden. Few instruments exist to assess the patient illness experience, with most based on healthcare provider assessment, lacking standardization in timepoints and symptom assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the content validity of the novel 'Dengue Virus Daily Diary (DENV-DD)', designed to measure symptom intensity and disease burden within outpatient infant to adult populations.MethodsThe Dengue Illness Index Report Card was used as a foundation to create the DENV-DD, consisting of patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO/ObsRO) instruments. In two South American dengue-endemic communities, qualitative combined concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted among individuals and caregivers of children with symptomatic laboratory-confirmed dengue. Interviews were conducted across two rounds allowing DENV-DD modifications. A small-scale quantitative assessment of the DENV-DD was also conducted with data from an independent Dengue Human Infection Model (DHIM) to generate early evidence of feasibility of DENV-DD completion, instrument performance and insight into the sign/symptom trajectory over the course of illness.ResultsForty-eight participants were interviewed (20 adults, 20 older children/adolescents with their caregivers, 8 caregivers of younger children). A wide spectrum of signs/symptoms lasting 3-15 days were reported with fever, headache, body ache/pain, loss of appetite, and body weakness each reported by > 70% participants. DENV-DD instructions, items and response scales were understood, and items were considered relevant across ages. DHIM data supported feasibility of DENV-DD completion.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate content validity of the DENV-DD (PRO/ObsRO instruments) in dengue-endemic populations. Psychometric and cultural validity studies are ongoing to support use of the DENV-DD in clinical studies.

Background: Patient‐focused outcomes present a central need for trial‐readiness across all ataxias. The Activities of Daily Living part of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS‐ADL) captures functional impairment and longitudinal change but is only validated in Friedreich Ataxia. Objective: Validation of FARS‐ADL regarding disease severity and patient‐meaningful impairment, and its sensitivity to change across genetic ataxias. Methods: Real‐world registry data of FARS‐ADL in 298 ataxia patients across genotypes were analyzed, including (1) cross‐correlation with FARS‐stage, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)‐ataxia, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions visual analogue scale (EQ5D‐VAS); (2) sensitivity to change within a trial‐relevant 1‐year median follow‐up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI‐C); and (3) general linear modeling of factors age, sex, and depression (nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ‐9]). Results: FARS‐ADL correlated with overall disability (rhoFARS‐stage = 0.79), clinical disease severity (rhoSARA = 0.80), and patient‐reported impairment (rhoPROM‐ataxia = 0.69, rhoEQ5D‐VAS = –0.37), indicating comprehensive construct validity. Also at item level, and validated within genotype (SCA3, RFC1), FARS‐ADL correlated with the corresponding SARA effector domains; and all items correlated to EQ5D‐VAS quality of life. FARS‐ADL was sensitive to change at a 1‐year interval, progressing only in patients with worsening PGI‐C. Minimal important change was 1.1. points based on intraindividual variability in patients with stable PGI‐C. Depression was captured using FARS‐ADL (+0.3 points/PHQ‐9 count) and EQ5D‐VAS, but not FARS‐stage or SARA. Conclusion: FARS‐ADL reflects both disease severity and patient‐meaningful impairment across genetic ataxias, with sensitivity to change in trial‐relevant timescales in patients perceiving change. It thus presents a promising patient‐focused outcome for upcoming ataxia trials. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Riboflavin transporter deficiency (RTD) is a progressive inherited neuropathy of childhood onset, characterised clinically by pontobulbar palsy, sensory ataxia, sensorineural deafness, muscle weakness, optic atrophy and respiratory failure. A robust and responsive functional outcome measure is essential for future clinical trials of disease‐modifying therapies including genetic therapies. The Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS) is a well‐validated outcome measure for CMT and related neuropathies, and might have utility for measuring disease progression in individuals with RTD. However, the CMTPedS requires modifications to account for phenotypic differences between children with CMT and RTD. The aim of this study was to develop a functional outcome measure based on the CMTPedS for specific use in individuals with RTD. Methods: The CMTPedS data collected over the last 10 years in individuals with RTD attending the Peripheral Neuropathy Management Clinic at the Children's Hospital at Westmead (Sydney, Australia) were reviewed to evaluate each item within the CMTPedS. A literature review of articles published until September 2021 for functional outcome measures generated an item pool for pilot testing. The results of this pilot testing, alongside analysis of existing CMTPedS item scores in the RTD cohort, informed the modification of the CMTPedS. Results: CMTPedS data were reviewed for eight individuals over the past 10 years. Two items were identified as requiring modification or removal and additional items of proximal strength and function needed to be considered. Six studies were identified in the literature review, and five items were selected for pilot testing. 'Shoulder internal rotation' and the '30‐s sit to stand test' were added as proximal measures of strength and function. The composite balance item comprising nine tasks in the CMTPedS showed a ceiling effect and was replaced with the single 'Feet apart on a line eyes open' balance item. 'Pinprick sensation' was removed due to a floor effect. Interpretation: This study provides preliminary evidence that the Riboflavin Transporter Deficiency Pediatric Scale (RTDPedS) is a functional outcome measure covering strength, upper and lower limb function, balance and mobility for individuals with RTD to assess disease severity and progression in clinical trials and cohort studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to collect data on disease symptoms in support of clinical trial endpoints. Clinical studies can last a year or more, and the patients' adherence and response time to daily at-home questionnaires may vary significantly over time. The aim of this study was to understand patterns and changes in patients' completion of daily PROMs during longitudinal clinical studies. Methods: Data were collected from 1342 patients randomized into three respiratory clinical trials (NCT03401229, NCT03347279, and NCT03406078). PROMs were completed by patients using electronic handheld devices that collected the starting and completion times. A Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to identify unbiased coefficients associated with PROM adherence and response time using patient, site, and calendar features as covariates. Results: Adherence decreased over time after randomization, and the rate of decrease was higher in younger patients. The 14-day pre-randomization adherence was correlated with adherence throughout the study. Patients were also more adherent during working days compared to non-working days. Oldest patients took twice as long to complete PROMs throughout the study; however, the response time for all patients decreased during the first month of the study regardless of age. Response time increased 7 days before and after the date of a scheduled clinic visit and when a patient-reported higher symptom burden. Conclusion: Detailed analyses of adherence and response time for daily PROMs in clinical trials can provide significant insights about trends of patient behavior in longitudinal clinical studies with high baseline adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify symptoms and their impacts on daily functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) experienced by adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for UC clinical studies. Methods: A conceptual model of symptoms and impacts of UC were developed from a literature review. PRO measures were identified from the literature, clinical trials databases, health technology assessment submissions, and regulatory label claims, and were selected for conceptual analysis based on disease specificity and use across information sources. PRO measures covering the most concepts when mapped against the conceptual model were assessed for gaps in psychometric properties using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria. Results: The conceptual model grouped the 52 symptom concepts and 72 proximal and distal impacts into eight, two, and five dimensions, respectively. Of 65 PRO measures identified, eight underwent conceptual analysis. Measures covering the most concepts and assessed for psychometric properties were the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire for UC, UC-PRO symptoms modules, UC-PRO impact modules, and Crohn's and UC Questionnaire; all had good or excellent support for content validity. The UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms fully met FDA guidance and COSMIN criteria for content validity and most psychometric properties. Conclusion: Existing PRO measures assess concepts relevant to patients with UC, but all PRO measures reviewed require further psychometric evaluation to demonstrate they are fit for purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Diary for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptoms-Constipation (DIBSS-C), which was developed to support primary and secondary endpoints in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant constipation (IBS-C) clinical trials. Observational data were collected from 108 adults with IBS-C using a smartphone-type device for 17 days. DIBSS-C data regarding bowel movements (BMs) were collected for each event (along with the Bristol Stool Form Scale); abdominal symptoms were rated each evening. Global status items and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-IBS were completed on day 10 and day 17 and the IBS-Symptom Severity Scale on day 17. Item-level performance, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity were evaluated. The Abdominal Symptoms Domain score demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha week 1 = 0.98; week 2 = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.93). Test-retest reliability was stronger for abdominal symptoms (ICC = 0.91-0.94) than for the frequency-based BM-related outcomes (ICC = 0.54-0.66). Key construct validity hypotheses were supported by moderate to strong correlations with the corresponding Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-IBS, IBS-Symptom Severity Scale, and Bristol Stool Form Scale items. All known-groups comparisons were statistically significant for the abdominal symptom items and domain score; evidence for known-groups validity of BM-related outcomes was supportive when based on constipation severity. The results of this study provided key psychometric evidence for the DIBSS-C, ultimately contributing to its qualification by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in IBS-C clinical trials. • Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic functional bowel disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of abdominal pain associated with alterations in bowel movements. • The Diary for IBS Symptoms-Constipation was developed to support primary and key secondary endpoints in clinical trials for the treatment of IBS with predominant constipation. • The results of this study provided key psychometric evidence for the Diary for IBS Symptoms-Constipation, ultimately contributing to the qualification of this measure by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2020 for use in IBS with predominant constipation clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: A COPD Foundation working group sought to identify measures of exercise endurance, a meaningful aspect of physical functioning in everyday life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that is not fully accepted in regulatory decision making, hampering drug development. Objectives: To demonstrate, as we previously asserted (Casaburi COPD 2022;9:252), that constant work rate cycling endurance time is an appropriate exercise endurance measure in patients with COPD. Methods: To validate this assertion, we assembled an integrated database of endurance time responses, including 8 bronchodilator (2,166 subjects) and 15 exercise training (3,488 subjects) studies (Casaburi COPD 2022;9:520). Results: Construct validity was demonstrated: 1) peak physiologic and perceptual responses were similar for constant work rate and incremental cycling; 2) after bronchodilator therapy, there were greater increases in endurance time in patients with more severe airflow limitation; 3) after exercise training, endurance time increases were similar across airflow limitation severities; and 4) there were correlations between changes in endurance time and changes in mechanistically related physiologic and perceptual variables. Test–retest reliability was demonstrated, with consistency of changes in endurance time at two time points after the intervention. Responsiveness was confirmed, with significant increases in endurance time after active (but not placebo) bronchodilator therapy, with greater increases seen with more severe airflow limitation and after exercise training. On the basis of regression analysis using multiple anchor variables, the minimum important difference for endurance time increase is estimated to be approximately 1 minute. Conclusions: Constant work rate cycling endurance time is a valid exercise endurance measure in COPD, suitable for contributing to the evaluation of treatment benefit supporting regulatory decision making and evidence-based therapeutic recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire Presbyopia (NAVQ-P) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in a phakic presbyopia population to assess near vision function impacts. The study refined and explored the psychometric properties and score interpretability of the NAVQ-P and additional PRO items assessing near vision correction independence (NVCI), near vision satisfaction (NVS), and near vision correction preference (NVCP). Methods: This was a psychometric validation study conducted using PRO data collected as part of a Phase IIb clinical trial (CUN8R44 A2202) consisting of 235 randomized adults with presbyopia from the US, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Data collected at baseline, week 2, and months 1, 2, and 3 during the 3-month trial treatment period were included in the analyses to assess item (question) properties, NAVQ-P dimensionality and scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Results: Item responses were distributed across the full response scale for most NAVQ-P and additional PRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the pre-defined unidimensional structure and calculation of a NAVQ-P total score as a measure of near vision function. Item deletion informed by item response distributions, dimensionality analyses, item response theory, and previous qualitative findings, including clinical input, supported retention of 14 NAVQ-P items. The 14-item NAVQ-P total score had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.979) and high test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients > = 0.898). There was good evidence of construct-related validity for all PROs supported by strong correlations with concurrent measures. Excellent results for known-groups validity and ability to detect change analyses were also demonstrated. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods supported interpretation of scores through generation of group-level and within-individual estimates of meaningful change thresholds. A meaningful within-patient change in the range of 8-15-point improvement on the NAVQ-P total score (score range 0–42) was recommended, including a more specific responder definition of 10-point improvement. Conclusions: The NAVQ-P, NVCI, and NVS are valid and reliable instruments which have the ability to detect change over time. Findings strongly support the use of these measures as outcome assessments in clinical/research studies and in clinical practice in the presbyopia population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionThe COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium (CBQC) was formed under COPD Foundation management, with the goal of qualifying biomarkers and clinical outcome assessments through established regulatory processes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Within CBQC, a working group evaluated opportunities for qualification of an exercise endurance measure. In a recent publication (Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022; 9[2]:252-265), we described a conceptual framework establishing exercise endurance's direct relationship to an individual with COPD's experience of physical functioning in daily life, and that increase in exercise endurance is a patient-centered, meaningful treatment benefit. We further proposed endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometery (CWRCE) as a useful efficacy endpoint in clinical therapeutic intervention trials. In this current publication, we describe the process of assembling an integrated database of endurance time responses to interventions in COPD.MethodsWe sought participant-level data from published studies incorporating CWRCE as an outcome measure. A literature search screened 2993 publications and identified 553 studies for assessment. Two interventions had sufficient data across studies to warrant data extraction: bronchodilators and rehabilitative exercise training. Investigators were contacted and requested to provide participant-by-participant data from their published studies.ResultsThe final dataset included data from 8 bronchodilator studies (2166) participants and 15 exercise training studies (3488 participants). The database includes 71 variables per participant, comprising demographic, pulmonary function, and detailed physiologic response data. This paper provides a detailed description of the analysis population, while analysis supporting the validation/qualification process and addressing other scientific questions will be described in subsequent publications.

Abstract Background Over the past few decades, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been used to understand patient health conditions better. Therefore, numerous PRO measures (questionnaires) and guidelines or guidance have been developed. However, it is challenging to select target guidance from among the many available guidance and to understand the chosen guidance. This study comprehensively collected the existing PRO guidance for clinical trials or studies and practices to support novice PRO users in academia, industry, clinical practice, and regulatory and reimbursement decision-making. Methods For the scoping review, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Google Books, WorldCat, and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Bookshelf databases from 2009 to 2023. The eligibility criteria were PRO guidance for clinical trials, clinical practice, or application such as health technology assessment. Those guidance cover aspects such as quality of life (QOL), PRO, health-related QOL, health state utilities, psychometric requirements, implementation methods, analysis and interpretation, or clinical practice applications. After the systematic search, three researchers individually reviewed the collected data, and the reviewed articles and books were scrutinized using the same criteria. Results We collected the PRO guidance published in articles and books between 2009 and 2023. From the database searches, 1,455 articles and 387 books were identified, of which one book and 33 articles were finally selected. The collected PRO guidance was categorized into the adoption of PRO measures, design and reporting of trials or studies using PROs, implementation of PRO evaluation in clinical trials or studies or clinical practice, analysis and interpretation of PROs, and application of PRO evaluation. Based on this categorization, we suggest the following for novices: When selecting guidance, novices should clarify the “place” and “purpose” where the guidance will be used. Additionally, they should know that the terminology related to PRO and the scope and expectations of PROs vary by “places” and “purposes”. Conclusions From this scoping review of existing PRO guidance, we provided summaries and caveats to assist novices in selecting guidance that fits their purpose and understanding it.

Abstract Background There is increased emphasis on incorporating patient perspectives and patient-relevant endpoints in drug development. We developed a conceptual model of the impact of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on patients’ lives and evaluated the content validity of the Hepatitis B Quality of Life (HBQOL) instrument, a patient-reported outcome tool for use in clinical studies, as a patient-relevant endpoint to measure health-related quality of life in patients with CHB. Methods A literature review of qualitative studies of patient experience with CHB and concept elicitation telephone interviews with patients with CHB in the United Kingdom were used to develop a conceptual model of the experience and impact of living with CHB. The content validity of the HBQOL was evaluated using cognitive debriefing techniques. Results The qualitative literature review (N = 43 publications) showed that patients with CHB experience emotional/psychological impacts. During concept elicitation interviews (N = 24), fatigue was the most commonly reported symptom, and most participants were worried/anxious about virus transmission and disease progression/death. A conceptual model of patients’ experiences with CHB was developed. The conceptual relevance and comprehensibility of the HBQOL were supported, though limitations, including the lack of a self-stigma item and recall period, were noted for future improvement. Conclusions The conceptual model shows that patients with CHB experience emotional/psychological impacts that affect their lifestyles, relationships, and work/schooling. The cognitive debriefing interviews support the content validity of the HBQOL as a conceptually relevant patient-reported outcome measure of health-related quality of life.

The Chronic Lung Disease Biomarker and Clinical Outcome Assessment Qualification Consortium (CBQC) evaluates the potential of biomarkers and outcome measures as drug development tools. Exercise endurance is an objective indicator of treatment benefit, closely related to daily physical function. Therefore, it is an ideal candidate for an outcome for drug development trials. Unfortunately, no exercise endurance measure is qualified by regulatory authorities for use in trials of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and no approved COPD therapies have claims of improving exercise endurance. Consequently, it has been challenging for developers to consider this outcome when designing clinical trials for new therapies. Endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometry (CWRCE), performed on an electronically braked stationary cycle ergometer, provides an exercise endurance measure under standardized conditions. Baseline individualized work rate for each participant is set using an incremental test. During CWRCE the patient is encouraged to continue exercising for as long as possible. Although not required, physiological and sensory responses (e.g., pulmonary ventilation, heart rate, dyspnea ratings) are frequently collected to support interpretation of endurance time changes. Exercise tolerance limit is reached when the individual is limited by symptoms, unable to maintain pedaling cadence or unable to continue safely. At exercise cessation, exercise duration is recorded. An CWRCE endurance time increase from the pre-treatment baseline is proposed as a key efficacy endpoint in clinical trials. In COPD, improved exercise endurance has a direct relationship to the experience of physical functioning in daily life, which is a patient-centered, meaningful benefit.

The Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimator is widely used in medical research to estimate the survival function from lifetime data. KM estimation is a powerful tool to evaluate clinical trials due to simple computational requirements, its use of a logrank hypothesis test, and the ability to censor patients. However, KM estimation has several constraints and fails to generalize to ordinal variables of clinical interest, such as toxicity and ECOG performance. We devised weighted trajectory analysis (WTA) to combine the advantages of KM estimation with the ability to visualize and compare treatment groups for ordinal variables and fluctuating outcomes. To assess statistical significance, we developed a new hypothesis test analogous to the logrank test. We demonstrated the functionality of WTA through 1000-fold clinical trial simulations of unique stochastic models of chemotherapy toxicity and schizophrenia disease course. With increments in sample size and hazard ratio, we compared the performance of WTA to KM estimation and the generalized estimating equation (GEE). WTA generally required half the sample size to achieve comparable power to KM estimation; advantages over the GEE included its robust nonparametric approach and summary plot. We also applied WTA to real clinical data: the toxicity outcomes of melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy and the disease progression of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving ramucirumab. The application of WTA demonstrated that using traditional methods such as KM estimation can lead to both type I and II errors by failing to model illness trajectory. This article outlines a novel method for clinical outcome assessment that extends the advantages of Kaplan–Meier estimates to ordinal outcome variables.

BackgroundResearch about pediatric patients' perspective on mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI) and its impact on daily life is limited. We aimed to identify the disease concepts of interest that most impact function and day-to-day life of pediatric patients with MPS VI, and to consider clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that may potentially measure meaningful improvements in these concepts.MethodsPotential focus group participants were identified by the National MPS Society (USA) and invited to participate if they self-reported a clinician-provided diagnosis of MPS VI and were 4 to 18 years, receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), and available to attend a 1-day focus group with their caregiver in Dallas, TX, USA. The focus group consisted of a series of polling and open-ended concept elicitation questions and a cognitive debriefing session. The discussion was audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed to identify disease concepts of interest and functional impacts most relevant to participants.ResultsOverall, caregivers (n = 9) and patients with MPS VI (n = 9) endorsed that although their children/they receive ERT, residual symptoms exist and impact health-related quality of life. The key disease concepts of interest identified were impaired mobility, upper extremity and fine motor deficits, pain, and fatigue. Pain was unanimously reported by all patients across many areas of the body and impacted daily activity. Key disease concepts were mapped to a selection of pediatric COAs including generic measures such as PROMIS®, PODCI, CHAQ, and PedsQL™. Caregivers endorsed the relevance of PODCI and PROMIS Upper Extremity, Mobility, and Pain items and all patients completed the NIH Toolbox Pegboard Dexterity Test. Additional COAs that aligned with the disease concepts included range of motion, the 2- and 6-min walk tests, timed stair climbs, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd edition, grip strength, pain visual analog scale, and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised.ConclusionAn MPS VI focus group of pediatric patients and their caregivers identified impaired mobility, upper extremity and fine motor deficits, pain, and fatigue as key disease concepts of interest. These disease concepts were mapped to existing pediatric COAs, which were provided to the group for endorsement of their relevance.

Meaghan O’Connor,1 Kristen Hsu,2 Lynne Broderick,1 Kristen L McCausland,1 Kaitlin LaGasse,1 Sabrina Rebello,2 Michelle Carty,1 Isabelle Lousada2 1QualityMetric Incorporated LLC, Johnston, RI, USA; 2Amyloidosis Research Consortium, Newton, MA, USACorrespondence: Kristen Hsu, Amyloidosis Research Consortium, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 210, Newton, MA, 02460, USA, Tel +1-617-467-5170, Email khsu@arci.orgPurpose: Patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) experience a wide variety of symptoms and impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the lack of an ATTR-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure has made consistent measurement of HRQoL in ATTR challenging. This paper describes the development of a conceptual model and subsequent content for the Transthyretin Amyloidosis – Quality of Life Questionnaire (ATTR-QOL), an ATTR-specific PRO measure.Methods: This was a cross-sectional, non-interventional, US-based study. The study design included three stages: 1) a targeted literature review followed by qualitative data collection with patients and experts; 2) development of a conceptual model and PRO measure; and 3) review of the PRO measure using a modified Delphi method, translatability assessment, and interviews with patients and experts. Revisions were made to the measure after each round of review.Results: Forty-four patients and 29 experts participated in this study. The conceptual model included two primary concepts of interest: symptoms (cardiac, neuropathic–peripheral, neuropathic–autonomic, and other) and impacts (eg, physical, role, and mental/emotional functioning). Seventy-two items were created (32 symptoms; 40 impacts) to align with the model. A recall period of one month was selected based on participant input.Conclusion: The ATTR-QOL was created with significant patient involvement and guidance from a multidisciplinary group of experts. The mix of patient and clinical perspectives helped to ensure a balanced representation of all relevant disease experiences and clinical specialties. With further refinement from psychometric testing, the ATTR-QOL will provide a standard, comprehensive measure for all ATTR-specific research including both clinical trials and clinical practice.Keywords: content validity, cardiomyopathy, polyneuropathy, qualitative, clinical outcome assessment

The Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimator is widely used in medical research to estimate the survival function from lifetime data. KM estimation is a powerful tool to evaluate clinical trials due to simple computational requirements, its use of a logrank hypothesis test, and the ability to censor patients. However, KM estimation has several constraints and fails to generalize to ordinal variables of clinical interest, such as toxicity and ECOG performance. We devised weighted trajectory analysis (WTA) to combine the advantages of KM estimation with the ability to visualize and compare treatment groups for ordinal variables and fluctuating outcomes. To assess statistical significance, we developed a new hypothesis test analogous to the logrank test. We demonstrated the functionality of WTA through 1000-fold clinical trial simulations of unique stochastic models of chemotherapy toxicity and schizophrenia disease course. With increments in sample size and hazard ratio, we compared the performance of WTA to KM estimation and the generalized estimating equation (GEE). WTA generally required half the sample size to achieve comparable power to KM estimation; advantages over the GEE included its robust nonparametric approach and summary plot. We also applied WTA to real clinical data: the toxicity outcomes of melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy and the disease progression of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving ramucirumab. The application of WTA demonstrated that using traditional methods such as KM estimation can lead to both type I and II errors by failing to model illness trajectory. This article outlines a novel method for clinical outcome assessment that extends the advantages of Kaplan–Meier estimates to ordinal outcome variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), that is, studies integrating elements of telemedicine and mobile/local healthcare providers allowing for home‐based assessments, are an important concept to make studies more resilient and more patient‐centric by taking into consideration participant's views and shifting trial activities to better meet the needs of trial participants. There are however, not only advantages but also challenges associated with DCTs. An area to be addressed by appropriate statistical methodology is the integration of data resulting from a possible mix of home and clinic assessments at different visits for the same variable, especially in adjusting for sources of possible systematic differences. One source of systematic bias may be how a participant perceives their disease and treatment in their home versus in a clinical setting. In this paper, we will discuss these issues with a focus on Neuroscience when participants have the choice between home and clinic assessments to illustrate how to identify systematic biases and describe appropriate approaches to maintain clinical trial scientific rigor. We will describe the benefits and challenges of DCTs in Neuroscience and then describe the relevance of home versus clinic assessments using the estimand framework. We outline several options to enable home assessments in a study. Results of simulations will be presented to help deciding between design and analysis options in a simple scenario where there might be differences in response between clinic and home assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesMethodsResultsConclusionsThe FDA recommends the use of anchor-based methods and empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) curves to establish a meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) for a clinical outcome assessment (COA). In practice, the estimates obtained from model-based methods and eCDF curves may not closely align, although an anchor is used with both. To help interpret their results, we investigated and compared these approaches.Both repeated measures model (RMM) and eCDF approaches were used to estimate an MWPC on a target COA. We used both real-life (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02697773) and simulated data sets that included 688 patients with up to six visits per patient, target COA (range 0 to 10), and an anchor measure on patient global assessment of osteoarthritis from 1 (very good) to 5 (very poor). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the MWPC were calculated by the bootstrap method.The distribution of the COA score changes affected the degree of concordance between RMM and eCDF estimates. The COA score changes from simulated normally distributed data led to greater concordance between the two approaches than did COA score changes from the actual clinical data. The confidence intervals of MWPC estimate based on eCDF methods were much wider than that by RMM methods, and the point estimate of eCDF methods varied noticeably across visits.Our data explored the differences of model-based methods over eCDF approaches, finding that the former integrates more information across a diverse range of COA and anchor scores and provides more precise estimates for the MWPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In support of UCB pharmaceutical research programs, the aim of this research was to implement a novel process for patient involvement in a multidisciplinary research group to co-create a clinical outcome assessment strategy to accurately reflect the experience of people living with early-stage Parkinson's. Patient experts were an integral part of the decision-making process for patient-reported outcome (PRO) research and instrument development. Methods: In partnership with two patient organizations (Parkinson's UK and the Parkinson's Foundation), 6 patient experts were recruited into a multidisciplinary research group alongside clinical, patient engagement and involvement, regulatory science, and outcome measurement experts. The group was involved across two phases of research; the first phase identified what symptoms are cardinal to the experience of living with early-stage Parkinson's and the second phase involved the development of PRO instruments to better assess the symptoms that are important to people living with early-stage Parkinson's. Patient experts were important in performing a variety of roles, in particular, qualitative study protocol design, conceptual model development, and subsequent co-creation of two PRO instruments. Results: Involving people with Parkinson's in PRO research ensured that the expertise of these representatives from the Parkinson's community shaped and drove the research; as such, PRO instruments were being developed with the patient at the forefront. Working with patient experts required considerable resource and time allocation for planning, communication, document development, and organizing meetings; however, their input enriched the development of PRO instruments and was vital in developing PRO instruments that are more meaningful for people with Parkinson's and clinicians. Conclusions: Conducting PRO research, in the context of clinical development involving pharmaceutical companies, requires balancing regulatory and scientific rigor with tight time constraints. Incorporating a multi-stakeholder perspective, which included patient experts as joint investigators, had a strong positive impact on our research, despite the logistical complexities of their involvement. Due to the input of patient experts, the innovative clinical outcome assessment strategy and the co-created novel PRO instruments were more relevant and holistic to the patient experience of early-stage Parkinson's. Plain English summary: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments allow people living with a disease and participating in a clinical study to describe the symptoms and experiences that they consider meaningful. PRO instruments use tools such as questionnaires and scales to capture patient perspectives on a treatment that might not be captured by a clinical measurement. It is recommended that the patient community and patient experts are included in the development of PRO instruments to accurately capture information that is important to them. Building on the experience of a recent PRO research project in support of UCB pharmaceutical programs, this article provides recommendations on how pharmaceutical companies can partner with patient organizations and involve patient experts as joint investigators in the co creation of PRO instruments. Despite the additional resource and time required, involving patient experts and patient organizations into the research collaboration had a strong positive impact and ensured that the PROs were meaningful to patients (in this instance, people living with early-stage Parkinson's). Patient organizations facilitated patient engagement and recruitment in research activities, maintained communication with the pharmaceutical company's research team, and built trust between collaborators by implementing patient engagement tools and best practices. Patient experts contributed to several parts of the PRO instrument development process: study design, identifying key symptoms and experiences, and developing individual PRO questions. Co-creation between the pharmaceutical company, patient experts, and patient organizations resulted in considerable improvements to typical PRO instrument development for use in clinical trials and is thus recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases in which little is known about the most appropriate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to capture disease progression. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine disease progression after 4.5years of follow-up with different clinician-reported (ClinRO) and gait performance outcomes (PerFOs). Methods: Twenty-six HSP patients (15 SPG4, 5 SPG7, 4 SPG5, 2 SPG3A) participated in this single-center cohort study in which the ClinRO: Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale; and the PerFOs: 10-meters walking test and timed-up and go (TUG), at self-selected and maximal walking speeds; Locomotor Rehabilitation Index; and 6-min walking test were performed at baseline and after 1.5 (18 patients) and 4.5 (13 patients) years. Results: In the 3-year interval between the second and third assessments, significant progressions were only found in PerFOs, while in the overall 4.5 years of follow-up, both PerFOs and ClinROs presented significant progressions. The progression slopes of COAs modeled according to the disease duration allowed the estimation of the annual progression of the outcomes and sample size estimations for future clinical trials of interventions with different effect sizes. TUG at maximal walking speed was the only COA capable of differentiating subjects with a worse compared to a stable/better impression of change and would require the smallest sample size if chosen as the primary endpoint of a clinical trial. Discussion: These findings indicate that both performance and clinician-reported outcomes can capture long-term progression of HSPs, with some PerFOs presenting greater sensitivity to change. The presented data are paramount for planning future disease-modifying and symptomatic therapy trials for this currently untreatable group of diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: As promising therapeutic interventions are tested among patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), there is a clear need for valid and reliable outcome tools to track disease progression and therapeutic gain in clinical trials and for clinical monitoring. Our aim was to develop and validate the Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy‐Health Index (FSHD‐HI) as a multifaceted patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) designed to measure disease burden in adults with FSHD. Methods: Through initial interviews with 20 individuals and a national cross‐sectional study with 328 individuals with FSHD, we identified the most prevalent and impactful symptoms in FSHD. The most relevant symptoms were included in the FSHD‐HI. We used patient interviews, test–retest reliability evaluation, known groups validity testing, and factor analysis to evaluate and optimize the FSHD‐HI. Results: The FSHD‐HI contains 14 subscales that measure FSHD disease burden from the patient's perspective. Fourteen adults with FSHD participated in semistructured beta interviews and found the FSHD‐HI to be clear, usable, and relevant to them. Thirty‐two adults with FSHD participated in test–retest reliability assessments, which demonstrated the high reliability of the FSHD‐HI total score (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.924). The final FSHD‐HI and its subscales also demonstrated a high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.988). Discussion: The FSHD‐HI provides researchers and clinicians with a reliable and valid mechanism to measure multifaceted disease burden in patients with FSHD. The FSHD‐HI may facilitate quantification of therapeutic effectiveness, as demonstrated by its use as a secondary and exploratory measure in several clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) has become one of the most widely used outcome instruments to assess global disability and recovery after traumatic brain injury. Achieving consistency in the application of the assessment remains a challenge, particularly in multi-center studies involving many assessors. We present a manual for the GOSE interview that is designed to support both single- and multi-center studies and promote inter-rater agreement. Many patients fall clearly into a particular category; however, patients may have outcomes that are on the borderline between adjacent categories, and cases can present other challenges for assessment. The Manual includes the general principles of assessment, advice on administering each section of the GOSE interview, and guidance on "borderline" and "difficult" cases. Finally, we discuss the properties of the GOSE, including strengths and limitations, and outline recommendations for assessor training, accreditation, and monitoring.

Abstract Background Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare, heterogenous neurogenetic condition, which significantly impacts the lives of people with AS and their families. Valid and reliable measures reporting key symptoms and functional impairments of AS are required to support development of patient-centered therapies. We describe the development of clinician- and caregiver-reported, AS-specific Global Impression scales for incorporation into clinical trials. Best practice US Food and Drug Administration guidance for measure development was followed with input from expert clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers during content generation and refinement. Results Initial measurement domains for the Symptoms of AS—Clinician Global Impression (SAS-CGI) and the Caregiver-reported AS Scale (CASS) were identified from a conceptual disease model of AS symptoms and impacts, derived from interviews with caregivers and clinicians. Two rounds of cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews were performed; clinicians debriefed the SAS-CGI, with patient advocates and caregivers debriefing the CASS to ensure relevance and comprehension. Feedback was used to refine items and ensure wording was age-appropriate and captured AS-specific symptoms, as well as associated impacts and functional impairments. The SAS-CGI and CASS capture global assessments of seizures, sleep, maladaptive behaviors, expressive communication, fine and gross motor skills, cognition, and self-care, which were determined by clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers to be the most challenging aspects of AS. Additionally, the measures include items for assessing overall AS symptoms and the meaningfulness of any change. In addition to ratings for severity, impact, and change, a notes field was included in the SAS-CGI to provide the rationale for the chosen rating. CD interviews confirmed the measures covered key concepts of AS from the perspective of clinicians and caregivers, and demonstrated that the measures’ instructions, items, and response options were clear and appropriate. Interview feedback informed adjustments to the wording of the instructions and the items. Conclusions The SAS-CGI and CASS were designed to capture multiple AS symptoms, reflecting the heterogeneity and complexity of AS in children 1 to 12 years old. These clinical outcome assessments have been incorporated into AS clinical studies, which will allow for the evaluation of their psychometric properties and inform further refinements if needed.

Introduction: Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide opportunities for real-time data collection and assessment of patient function. However, use of DHT-derived endpoints in clinical trials to support medical product labelling claims is limited. Methods: From November 2020 through March 2021, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with sponsors of clinical trials that used DHT-derived endpoints. We aimed to learn about their experiences, including their interactions with regulators and the challenges they encountered. Using applied thematic analysis, we identified barriers to and recommendations for using DHT-derived endpoints in pivotal trials. Results: Sponsors identified five key challenges to incorporating DHT-derived endpoints in clinical trials. These included (1) a need for additional regulatory clarity specific to DHT-derived endpoints, (2) the official clinical outcome assessment qualification process being impractical for the biopharmaceutical industry, (3) a lack of comparator clinical endpoints, (4) a lack of validated DHTs and algorithms for concepts of interest, and (5) a lack of operational support from DHT vendors. Discussion/Conclusion: CTTI shared the interview findings with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and during a multi-stakeholder expert meeting. Based on these discussions, we provide several new and revised tools to aid sponsors in using DHT-derived endpoints in pivotal trials to support labelling claims.

Abstract Introduction Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders resulting in visual impairments and impacts on patients’ vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to conduct qualitative research to understand the patient experience of RP/LCA across genotypes and inform development of patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO/ObsRO) instruments in RP/LCA. Methods Research activities included a qualitative literature review and review of existing visual function PRO instruments in RLBP1 RP, and concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews of existing PRO instruments with patients with RLBP1 RP, expert clinicians, and payers. In wider RP/LCA, a social media listening (SML) study and a qualitative literature review was conducted, while psychometric evaluation of a PRO instrument in LCA was performed. Input from expert clinicians was sought at key stages. Results Findings from the qualitative literature reviews identified a range of visual function symptoms which had significant impacts on patients’ vision-related ADL and distal HRQoL. Patient interviews identified additional visual function symptoms and impacts not previously reported in published literature. These sources informed development and refinement of a conceptual model displaying the patient experience of RP/LCA. Review of existing visual function PRO instruments, and CD interviews evaluating their content validity, confirmed that no existing instrument provides a comprehensive assessment of all concepts relevant to patients with RP/LCA. This highlighted the need for development of the Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes PRO and ObsRO instruments to adequately assess the patient experience of RP/LCA. Conclusions Results informed and supported development of the instruments to assess visual functioning symptoms and vision-dependent ADL, mobility and distal HRQoL in RP/LCA, in accordance with regulatory standards. Next steps to further support use in RP/LCA clinical trials/practice includes content and psychometric validation of the instruments in this population.

In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders resulting in visual impairments and impacts on patients' vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to conduct qualitative research to understand the patient experience of RP/LCA across genotypes and inform development of patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO/ObsRO) instruments in RP/LCA. Methods: Research activities included a qualitative literature review and review of existing visual function PRO instruments in RLBP1 RP, and concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews of existing PRO instruments with patients with RLBP1 RP, expert clinicians, and payers. In wider RP/LCA, a social media listening (SML) study and a qualitative literature review was conducted, while psychometric evaluation of a PRO instrument in LCA was performed. Input from expert clinicians was sought at key stages. Results: Findings from the qualitative literature reviews identified a range of visual function symptoms which had significant impacts on patients' vision-related ADL and distal HRQoL. Patient interviews identified additional visual function symptoms and impacts not previously reported in published literature. These sources informed development and refinement of a conceptual model displaying the patient experience of RP/LCA. Review of existing visual function PRO instruments, and CD interviews evaluating their content validity, confirmed that no existing instrument provides a comprehensive assessment of all concepts relevant to patients with RP/LCA. This highlighted the need for development of the Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes PRO and ObsRO instruments to adequately assess the patient experience of RP/LCA. Conclusions: Results informed and supported development of the instruments to assess visual functioning symptoms and vision-dependent ADL, mobility and distal HRQoL in RP/LCA, in accordance with regulatory standards. Next steps to further support use in RP/LCA clinical trials/practice includes content and psychometric validation of the instruments in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders. The associated visual impairments have significant impacts on patients' vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL), mobility, and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To adequately capture patient and caregiver perspectives in clinical trials, patient and observer-reported outcome instruments must demonstrate sufficient evidence of content validity in the target population. This study aimed to explore the patient experience of RP/LCA and assess the content validity of the Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes PRO (ViSIO-PRO) and ObsRO (ViSIO-ObsRO) instruments in RP/LCA. Methods: A total of 66 qualitative, combined concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews were conducted (33 adults, 10 adolescents, 8 children and 15 caregivers of children) in the US, France, Germany, and Canada. Patients had a clinical and genetic diagnosis of RP/LCA from a range of genotypes. CE results were used to further inform the development of a conceptual model and CD interviews assessed the relevance and understanding of the 44-item ViSIO-PRO and 26-item ViSIO-ObsRO instruments. Interviews were conducted across two iterative rounds to allow item modifications. Results: Findings were consistent across RP/LCA genotypes. Night blindness, reduced peripheral vision, vision in very bright lighting and light/dark adaptation were the most frequently reported visual function symptoms impacting vision-dependent ADL and mobility. Impacts on distal HRQoL domains were also reported. The ViSIO-PRO and ObsRO items were well understood by participants and relevant across genotypes. The instructions, 7-day recall period and response scales were well understood and endorsed. Participant and expert clinician feedback supported modifications to item wording, the addition of six new ViSIO-PRO items and one new ViSIO-ObsRO item, and the removal of one ViSIO-PRO item due to lack of relevance. Conclusions: Findings support the content validity of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO instruments for use across RP/LCA genotypes. Ongoing research to evaluate the psychometric validity of the instruments will support future use of the instruments as efficacy endpoints in clinical trials and in general clinical practice to track disease severity and impact of disease on functioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an ultra-rare, life-threatening hereditary disorder that causes patients to experience significant morbidity and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A cTTP disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that is reflective of patients' experiences with the disorder does not currently exist. The objective of this study was to evaluate and validate the psychometric properties of the Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura–Patient Experience Questionnaire (cTTP-PEQ), developed using a literature review, interviews with expert clinicians, and qualitative concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews. Methods: This prospective, observational study (NCT03519672) was conducted with patients diagnosed with cTTP currently receiving treatment. Patients were enrolled through investigator sites and direct-to-patient recruitment. Individuals completed electronic self-administered PRO measures, including the cTTP-PEQ, at baseline and Day 14 (+ up to 10 days). The cTTP-PEQ consisted of five multi-item domains (Pain/Bruising, Cognitive Impairment, Visual Impairment, Mood, Treatment Burden) and three single-item domains (Fatigue, Headache, Activity Limitation), and assessed symptoms and impact of cTTP in the previous 24 h, 7 days, and 2 weeks. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Known-groups validity was assessed between patient groups separated by Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S; normal vs. mild/moderate/severe). Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Thirty-six patients participated in this study. Convergent validity was confirmed with high-to-moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.4) for 12/15 hypothesized relationships between pairs of domains and/or total scores. Discriminant validity was confirmed with low correlations (r < 0.3) observed for 5/7 hypothesized relationships. Known-groups validity was confirmed with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in mean cTTP-PEQ scores between the two PGI-S groups for most domains and items at both timepoints. Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 at baseline and 0.91 at Day 14, confirming internal consistency of the instrument. Test–retest reliability was also confirmed with a high ICC (0.96). Conclusion: This study validates the psychometric properties of the novel cTTP-PEQ for use in research and clinical practice to assess HRQoL among patients with cTTP. This instrument will be particularly useful when assessing cTTP disease burden and the impact of new treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: It has been reported that breast cancer (BC) with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) might be a distinct subtype of BC. However, the prognostic effect of low HER2 expression on BC patients remains controversial. We aim to conduct this single-institution retrospective analysis to assess HER2-low-positive BC outcomes in Chinese women and the prognostic role of TILs in HER2-low-positive early-stage BC. Method: We retrospectively enrolled 1,763 BC patients treated in a single institution from 2017 to 2018. TILs are regarded as continuous variables and are divided into low TILs (=10%) and high TILs (>10%) for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the associations between TILs and disease-free survival (DFS) with adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics. Result: High TIL levels (>10%) were associated with tumor size (>2 cm, p = 0.042), age at diagnosis (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (>25%; p <0.001), HR (hormone receptor) status (positive, p <0.001), advanced pathological stage (p = 0.043), subtype (p <0.001), and HER2 status (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.83) could be found between HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 BC. The DFS of HER2-low-positive BC and HER2-nonamplified BC with high levels of TILs was statistically better than that of patients with low levels of TILs (p = 0.015; p = 0.047). In HER2-low-positive BC patients with high TIL levels (>10%), DFS was significantly improved in both the univariate (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87, P = 0.018) and multivariate (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, P = 0.035) Cox models. For further subgroup analysis, HR (+)/HER2-low-positive BC with high TIL (>10%) levels was associated with improved DFS in both the univariate (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.90, P = 0.025) andmultivariate (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, P = 0.032) Cox models. The HR (-)/HER2-0 BC with high TIL (>10%) level was not statistically significant in the univariate Cox model, but it was statistically significant in the multivariate (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.28-0.96, P = 0.045) Cox model. Conclusion: Among early-stage BC, no significant survival difference could be found between the HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 cohorts. High levels of TILs were significantly associated with improved DFS in HER2-lowpositive patients, especially in the HR (+)/HER2-low-positive subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundINAD is an autosomal recessive neurogenetic disorder caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in PLA2G6. The downstream enzyme, iPLA2, plays a critical role in cell membrane homeostasis by helping to regulate levels of phospholipids. The clinical presentation occurs between 6 months and 3 years with global developmental regression, hypotonia, and progressive spastic tetraparesis. Progression is often rapid, resulting in severe spasticity, visual impairment, and cognitive decline, with many children not surviving past the first decade of life. To date, no accepted tool for assessing the severity of INAD exists; other commonly used scales (e.g. CHOP-INTEND, Modified Ashworth, Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale) do not accurately gauge the current severity of INAD, nor are they sensitive/specific enough to monitor disease progression. Finally, these other scales are not appropriate, because they do not address the combination of CNS, peripheral nerve, and visual pathology that occurs in children with INAD.MethodsWe have developed and validated a structured neurological examination for INAD (scored out of 80). The examination includes six main categories of pediatric developmental evaluation: 1) gross motor-and-truncal-stability skills, 2) fine motor skills, 3) bulbar function, 4) ocular function, 5) temporo-frontal function, and, 6) Functional evaluation of the autonomic nervous system. A cohort of patients diagnosed with INAD were followed prospectively to validate the score against disease severity and disease progression.ResultsWe show significant correlation between the total neurological assessment score and months since symptom onset with a statistically significant (p = 6.7 × 10- 07) correlation between assessment score and disease onset. As hypothesized, the coefficient of months-since-symptom-onset is strongly negative, indicating a negative correlation between total score and months since symptom onset.ConclusionWe have developed and validated a novel neurological assessment score in INAD that demonstrates strong correlation with disease severity and disease progression.

Abstract Introduction Insight into the relationship between concepts that matter to the people affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the clinical outcome assessments (COAs) commonly used in AD clinical studies is limited. Phases 1 and 2 of the What Matters Most (WMM) study series identified and quantitatively confirmed 42 treatment-related outcomes that are important to people affected by AD. Methods We compared WMM concepts rated as “very important” or higher to items included in COAs used commonly in AD studies. Results Twenty COAs designed to assess signs, symptoms, and impacts across the spectrum of AD were selected for review. Among these 20 COAs, only 5 reflected 12 or more WMM concepts [Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory–Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI), Alzheimer's Disease Composite Scores (ADCOMS), and Clinical Dementia Rating; Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR/CDR-SB)]. Multiple symptoms and impacts of AD identified as important and meaningful in the WMM studies map only indirectly at best to 7 of the 20 most widely used COAs. Conclusion While many frequently used COAs in AD capture some concepts identified as important to AD populations and their care partners, overlap between any single measure and the concepts that matter to people affected by AD is limited. The highest singly matched COA reflects fewer than half (45%) of WMM concepts. Use of multiple COAs expands coverage of meaningful concepts. Future research should explore the content validity of AD COAs planned for AD trials based on further confirmation of the ecological validity of the WMM items. This research should inform development and use of core outcome sets that capture WMM items and selection or development of new companion tools to fully demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes spanning WMM.

Abstract Introduction Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders. The Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes patient-reported outcome (ViSIO-PRO) and observer-reported outcome (ViSIO-ObsRO) instruments were developed in this population to assess visual function symptoms and impacts on vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL) and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO in RP/LCA. Methods The 49-item ViSIO-PRO and 27-item ViSIO-ObsRO instruments were completed by 83 adult and adolescent patients and 22 caregivers of child patients aged 3–11 years with RP/LCA, respectively, at baseline and 12–16-day follow-up. Concurrent measures were also administered at baseline. Psychometric analyses assessed item (question) properties, dimensionality, scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Results Item responses were mainly evenly distributed across the response scale, and inter-item correlations were mostly moderate to strong (> 0.30) at baseline within hypothesized domains. Item deletion was informed by item properties, qualitative data, and clinical input and supported retention of 35 ViSIO-PRO items and 25 ViSIO-ObsRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis in line with pre-hypothesized domains supported a four-factor model assessing visual function symptoms, mobility, vision-dependent ADL, and distal HRQoL. A bifactor model supported calculation of total scores and four domain scores. Internal consistency was high for domain and total scores (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70) and test–retest reliability for total scores was strong between baseline and 12–16-day follow-up (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.66–0.98). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations in a logical pattern with concurrent measures. Mean baseline scores differed significantly between severity groups. Distribution-based methods provided initial insights to guide interpretation of scores. Conclusions Findings supported item reduction and established scoring of the instruments. Evidence of reliability and validity as outcome measures in RP/LCA was also reported. Further research is ongoing to explore responsiveness of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO instruments and interpretation of change scores.

Background Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of hypokinesia globally. Currently, the reporting of outcomes in clinical trials for LBP lacks consistency, utility, and standardization, and the results of studies in the same field cannot be combined for comparison. Thus, the homogeneity and utility of outcomes need to be enhanced. Objective To assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for LBP and their outcome reports, then to analyze the variations of reported outcomes and measurements among different interventions for LBP, and to explore homogeneous and practical outcome indices for LBP. Methods Four clinical trials registry platforms (Complementary Medicine Field Trials Register, Back and Neck Review Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) and seven databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, VIP) were searched for RCTs about LBP treated by traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) , western medicine (WM) and integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine (TCM-WM) published during 2017 to 2021. Information was extracted and analyzed descriptively. Results In total, 1 014 RCTs of LBP with WM treatment, 624 RCTs of LBP with TCM treatment, and 392 RCTs of LBP with integrated TCM-WM treatment were included. Overall, the quality of RCTs was low and the reporting of outcome in different interventions was deficient. Through our assessment, the total Jadad score was 2 (2, 4) for RCTs of LBP with WM treatment, 2 (2, 3) for RCTs of LBP with TCM treatment, and 2 (2, 2) for those of LBP with integrated TCM-WM treatment, with more than 50% of the RCTs having a total Jadad score of 2, and more than 10% having a Jadad score of 3. More than 80% of the RCTs had an outcome score of 1. The number of indices reported in RCTs about WM for LBP ranged from 1 to 8 (with a median value of 2) , and the top five outcome domains reported with frequency were pain level (28.2%) , physical function (28.0%) , hospital-related outcomes (8.0%) , economic indices (8.0%) , and adverse events/effects (8.0%) , and the top three scales used to evaluate outcomes were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) /Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) , the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) , and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA) . The number of indices reported in RCTs about TCM for LBP ranged from 1 to 6 (with a median value of 2) , and the top five outcome domains reported with frequency were pain level (45%) , physical function (27%) , others (14%) , overall quality of life (5%) , and musculoskeletal and connective tissue outcomes (2%) , and the main scales used included VAS/VRS, ODI, short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) , the Numerical Rating Scale/ Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS/NPRS) , Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ/RMD) , and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey/ 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12/SF-36) . The number of indices reported in RCTs for LBP with integrated TCM-WM treatment was 1-12 (with a median value of 2) , and the top five outcome domains reported with high frequency were physical function (39%) , pain level (34%) , others (9%) , overall quality of life (5%) , and musculoskeletal and connective tissue outcomes (4%) , and the scales used with high frequency were VAS/VRS, ODI, JOA, SF-12/SF-36, RMDQ, and NRS/NPRS. The evaluation dimensions of outcomes for three interventions were all mainly based on pain level and physical function, and the measurements were focused on the VAS/VRS scale (WM: 22.16%, TCM: 32.97%, integrated TCM-WM: 30.94%) and the ODI/CODI scale (WM: 15.88%, TCM: 18.74%, integrated TCM-WM: 20.07%) , and the common outcome indices with corresponding measurements were pain level (VAS/VRS) , physical function (ODI/RMD) , overall quality of life (SF-12/SF-36) and imaging results (X-ray/CT/MRI) . Conclusion By means of quality evaluation and data analysis, the result showed that all RCTs for LBP and their outcome reports had low-quality. The main outcome assessments among three interventions were pain level and physical function, and the main measurements were the VAS/VRS scale and the ODI/CODI scale. Pain level, physical function, quality of life, and imaging results were commonly reported through varied interventions. In brief, the results provide a basis for the future construction of Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Intervention-related Specific Outcome Sets (In-SOS) for LBP.

Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare, heterogenous neurogenetic condition, which significantly impacts the lives of people with AS and their families. Valid and reliable measures reporting key symptoms and functional impairments of AS are required to support development of patient-centered therapies. We describe the development of clinician- and caregiver-reported, AS-specific Global Impression scales for incorporation into clinical trials. Best practice US Food and Drug Administration guidance for measure development was followed with input from expert clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers during content generation and refinement. Results: Initial measurement domains for the Symptoms of AS—Clinician Global Impression (SAS-CGI) and the Caregiver-reported AS Scale (CASS) were identified from a conceptual disease model of AS symptoms and impacts, derived from interviews with caregivers and clinicians. Two rounds of cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews were performed; clinicians debriefed the SAS-CGI, with patient advocates and caregivers debriefing the CASS to ensure relevance and comprehension. Feedback was used to refine items and ensure wording was age-appropriate and captured AS-specific symptoms, as well as associated impacts and functional impairments. The SAS-CGI and CASS capture global assessments of seizures, sleep, maladaptive behaviors, expressive communication, fine and gross motor skills, cognition, and self-care, which were determined by clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers to be the most challenging aspects of AS. Additionally, the measures include items for assessing overall AS symptoms and the meaningfulness of any change. In addition to ratings for severity, impact, and change, a notes field was included in the SAS-CGI to provide the rationale for the chosen rating. CD interviews confirmed the measures covered key concepts of AS from the perspective of clinicians and caregivers, and demonstrated that the measures' instructions, items, and response options were clear and appropriate. Interview feedback informed adjustments to the wording of the instructions and the items. Conclusions: The SAS-CGI and CASS were designed to capture multiple AS symptoms, reflecting the heterogeneity and complexity of AS in children 1 to 12 years old. These clinical outcome assessments have been incorporated into AS clinical studies, which will allow for the evaluation of their psychometric properties and inform further refinements if needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Anchor-based methods are group-level approaches used to derive clinical outcome assessment (COA) interpretation thresholds of meaningful within-patient change over time for understanding impacts of disease and treatment. The methods explore the associations between change in the targeted concept of the COA measure and the concept measured by the external anchor(s), typically a global rating, chosen as easier to interpret than the COA measure. While they are valued for providing plausible interpretation thresholds, group-level anchor-based methods pose a number of inherent theoretical and methodological conundrums for interpreting individual-level change. Methods: This investigation provides a critical appraisal of anchor-based methods for COA interpretation thresholds and details key biases in anchor-based methods that directly influences the magnitude of the interpretation threshold. Results: Five important research issues inherent with the use of anchor-based methods deserve attention: (1) global estimates of change are consistently biased toward the present state; (2) the use of static current state global measures, while not subject to artifacts of recall, may exacerbate the problem of estimating clinically meaningful change; (3) the specific anchor assessment response(s) that identify the meaningful change group usually involves an arbitrary judgment; (4) the calculated interpretation thresholds are sensitive to the proportion of patients who have improved; and (5) examination of anchor-based regression methods reveals that the correlation between the COA change scores and the anchor has a direct linear relationship to the magnitude of the interpretation threshold derived using an anchor-based approach; stronger correlations yielding larger interpretation thresholds. Conclusions: While anchor-based methods are recognized for their utility in deriving interpretation thresholds for COAs, attention to the biases associated with estimation of the threshold using these methods is needed to progress in the development of standard-setting methodologies for COAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluating the clinical benefit of interventions for conditions with heterogeneous symptom and impact presentations is challenging. The same condition can present differently across and within individuals over time. This occurs frequently in rare diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) assessment approaches used in clinical trials to address heterogeneous manifestations that could be relevant in rare disease research and (2) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved labeling claims that used these approaches. A targeted literature review was conducted examining peer-reviewed publications and FDA-approved labeling claims from January 2002 to July 2020, focusing on claims incorporating clinical outcome assessments. Approaches were then assessed for their potential application in rare diseases. A total of 6 assessment approaches were identified: composite or other multicomponent endpoints, multidomain responder index, most bothersome symptom (MBS), goal attainment scaling, sliding dichotomy, and adequate relief. A total of 59 FDA-approved labeling claims associated with these approaches were identified: composite or other multicomponent endpoints (n = 49), MBS (n = 9), and adequate relief (n = 1). A total of 10 FDA-approved labeling claims, all using multicomponent endpoints, were identified for rare diseases. Multicomponent, MBS, and adequate relief have been included in FDA-approved labeling claims. Multicomponent endpoints, including composite endpoints, were the most frequent way to address heterogeneous manifestations of both common and rare diseases. MBS may be acceptable to regulators, whereas multidomain responder index is unlikely to be. The goal attainment scaling and adequate relief approaches may have potential utility in rare disease trials, assuming the theoretical and statistical challenges inherent in each approach are managed. • Evaluating the clinical benefit of interventions aimed at treating conditions with heterogeneous symptom and impact presentations is challenging. The same condition can present quite differently across individuals and change within individuals over time. This occurs frequently in rare diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) assessment approaches used in clinical trials to address heterogeneous manifestations that could be relevant in rare disease research and (2) Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling claims that used these approaches. • A total of 6 approaches to assessing clinical benefit of interventions for conditions with heterogeneous symptom and impact presentations were identified: composite or other multicomponent endpoints, multidomain responder index, most bothersome symptom, goal attainment scaling, sliding dichotomy, and adequate relief. Based on Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling claims, multicomponent endpoints have been the most successful approach in common and rare diseases. The most bothersome symptom, goal attainment scaling, multidomain responder index, and adequate relief approaches may also have potential applications in rare disease trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders. The Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes patient-reported outcome (ViSIO-PRO) and observer-reported outcome (ViSIO-ObsRO) instruments were developed in this population to assess visual function symptoms and impacts on vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL) and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO in RP/LCA. Methods: The 49-item ViSIO-PRO and 27-item ViSIO-ObsRO instruments were completed by 83 adult and adolescent patients and 22 caregivers of child patients aged 3–11 years with RP/LCA, respectively, at baseline and 12–16-day follow-up. Concurrent measures were also administered at baseline. Psychometric analyses assessed item (question) properties, dimensionality, scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Results: Item responses were mainly evenly distributed across the response scale, and inter-item correlations were mostly moderate to strong (> 0.30) at baseline within hypothesized domains. Item deletion was informed by item properties, qualitative data, and clinical input and supported retention of 35 ViSIO-PRO items and 25 ViSIO-ObsRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis in line with pre-hypothesized domains supported a four-factor model assessing visual function symptoms, mobility, vision-dependent ADL, and distal HRQoL. A bifactor model supported calculation of total scores and four domain scores. Internal consistency was high for domain and total scores (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70) and test–retest reliability for total scores was strong between baseline and 12–16-day follow-up (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.66–0.98). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations in a logical pattern with concurrent measures. Mean baseline scores differed significantly between severity groups. Distribution-based methods provided initial insights to guide interpretation of scores. Conclusions: Findings supported item reduction and established scoring of the instruments. Evidence of reliability and validity as outcome measures in RP/LCA was also reported. Further research is ongoing to explore responsiveness of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO instruments and interpretation of change scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Insight into the relationship between concepts that matter to the people affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the clinical outcome assessments (COAs) commonly used in AD clinical studies is limited. Phases 1 and 2 of the What Matters Most (WMM) study series identified and quantitatively confirmed 42 treatment-related outcomes that are important to people affected by AD. Methods: We compared WMM concepts rated as "very important" or higher to items included in COAs used commonly in AD studies. Results: Twenty COAs designed to assess signs, symptoms, and impacts across the spectrum of AD were selected for review. Among these 20 COAs, only 5 reflected 12 or more WMM concepts [Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory–Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI), Alzheimer's Disease Composite Scores (ADCOMS), and Clinical Dementia Rating; Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR/CDR-SB)]. Multiple symptoms and impacts of AD identified as important and meaningful in the WMM studies map only indirectly at best to 7 of the 20 most widely used COAs. Conclusion: While many frequently used COAs in AD capture some concepts identified as important to AD populations and their care partners, overlap between any single measure and the concepts that matter to people affected by AD is limited. The highest singly matched COA reflects fewer than half (45%) of WMM concepts. Use of multiple COAs expands coverage of meaningful concepts. Future research should explore the content validity of AD COAs planned for AD trials based on further confirmation of the ecological validity of the WMM items. This research should inform development and use of core outcome sets that capture WMM items and selection or development of new companion tools to fully demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes spanning WMM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionHereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases in which little is known about the most appropriate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to capture disease progression. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine disease progression after 4.5 years of follow-up with different clinician-reported (ClinRO) and gait performance outcomes (PerFOs).MethodsTwenty-six HSP patients (15 SPG4, 5 SPG7, 4 SPG5, 2 SPG3A) participated in this single-center cohort study in which the ClinRO: Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale; and the PerFOs: 10-meters walking test and timed-up and go (TUG), at self-selected and maximal walking speeds; Locomotor Rehabilitation Index; and 6-min walking test were performed at baseline and after 1.5 (18 patients) and 4.5 (13 patients) years.ResultsIn the 3-year interval between the second and third assessments, significant progressions were only found in PerFOs, while in the overall 4.5 years of follow-up, both PerFOs and ClinROs presented significant progressions. The progression slopes of COAs modeled according to the disease duration allowed the estimation of the annual progression of the outcomes and sample size estimations for future clinical trials of interventions with different effect sizes. TUG at maximal walking speed was the only COA capable of differentiating subjects with a worse compared to a stable/better impression of change and would require the smallest sample size if chosen as the primary endpoint of a clinical trial.DiscussionThese findings indicate that both performance and clinician-reported outcomes can capture long-term progression of HSPs, with some PerFOs presenting greater sensitivity to change. The presented data are paramount for planning future disease-modifying and symptomatic therapy trials for this currently untreatable group of diseases.