Search

The oncogenesis and development of glioblastoma multiforme have been linked to glycosylation modifications, which are common post-translational protein modifications. Abnormal glycosyltransferase development leads to irregular glycosylation patterns, which hold clinical significance for GB prognosis. By utilizing both single-cell and bulk data, we developed a scoring system to assess glycosylation levels in GB. Moreover, a glycosylation-based signature was created to predict GB outcomes and therapy responsiveness. The study led to the development of an glyco-model incorporating nine key genes. This risk assessment tool effectively stratified GB patients into two distinct groups. Extensive validation through ROC analysis, RMST, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis emphasized the model's robust predictive capabilities. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed to predict survival rates at specific time intervals. The research revealed substantial disparities in immune cell infiltration between low-risk and high-risk groups, characterized by differences in immune cell abundance and elevated immune scores. Notably, the glyco-model predicted diverse responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors and drug therapies, with high-risk groups exhibiting a preference for immune checkpoint inhibitors and demonstrated superior responses to drug treatments. Furthermore, the study identified two potential drug targets and utilized Connectivity Map analysis to pinpoint promising therapeutic agents. Clofarabine and YM155 were identified as potent candidates for the treatment of high-risk GB. Our well-crafted glyco-model effectively discriminates patients by calculating the risk score, accurately predicting GB outcomes, and significantly enhancing prognostic assessment while identifying novel immunotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic strategies for GB treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Over 50% of patients with systemic LCH are not cured with front‐line therapies, and data to guide salvage options are limited. We describe 58 patients with LCH who were treated with clofarabine. Clofarabine monotherapy was active against LCH in this cohort, including heavily pretreated patients with a systemic objective response rate of 92.6%, higher in children (93.8%) than adults (83.3%). BRAFV600E+ variant allele frequency in peripheral blood is correlated with clinical responses. Prospective multicentre trials are warranted to determine optimal dosing, long‐term efficacy, late toxicities, relative cost and patient‐reported outcomes of clofarabine compared to alternative LCH salvage therapy strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We recently reported results of the prospective, open‐label HOVON‐100 trial in 334 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) randomized to first‐line treatment with or without clofarabine (CLO). No improvement of event‐free survival (EFS) was observed, while a higher proportion of patients receiving CLO obtained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Aim: In order to investigate the effects of CLO in more depth, two multi‐state models were developed to identify why CLO did not show a long‐term survival benefit despite more MRD‐negativity. Methods: The first model evaluated the effect of CLO on going off‐protocol (not due to refractory disease/relapse, completion or death) as a proxy of severe treatment‐related toxicity, while the second model evaluated the effect of CLO on obtaining MRD negativity. The subsequent impact of these intermediate events on death or relapsed/refractory disease was assessed in both models. Results: Overall, patients receiving CLO went off‐protocol more frequently than control patients (35/168 [21%] vs. 18/166 [11%], p = 0.019; HR 2.00 [1.13–3.52], p = 0.02), especially during maintenance (13/44 [30%] vs. 6/56 [11%]; HR 2.85 [95%CI 1.08–7.50], p = 0.035). Going off‐protocol was, however, not associated with more relapse or death. Patients in the CLO arm showed a trend towards an increased rate of MRD‐negativity compared with control patients (HR MRD‐negativity: 1.35 [0.95–1.91], p = 0.10), which did not translate into a significant survival benefit. Conclusion: We conclude that the intermediate states, i.e., going off‐protocol and MRD‐negativity, were affected by adding CLO, but these transitions were not associated with subsequent survival estimates, suggesting relatively modest antileukemic activity in ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We recently reported results of the prospective, open‐label HOVON‐100 trial in 334 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) randomized to first‐line treatment with or without clofarabine (CLO). No improvement of event‐free survival (EFS) was observed, while a higher proportion of patients receiving CLO obtained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Aim In order to investigate the effects of CLO in more depth, two multi‐state models were developed to identify why CLO did not show a long‐term survival benefit despite more MRD‐negativity. Methods The first model evaluated the effect of CLO on going off‐protocol (not due to refractory disease/relapse, completion or death) as a proxy of severe treatment‐related toxicity, while the second model evaluated the effect of CLO on obtaining MRD negativity. The subsequent impact of these intermediate events on death or relapsed/refractory disease was assessed in both models. Results Overall, patients receiving CLO went off‐protocol more frequently than control patients (35/168 [21%] vs. 18/166 [11%], p = 0.019; HR 2.00 [1.13–3.52], p = 0.02), especially during maintenance (13/44 [30%] vs. 6/56 [11%]; HR 2.85 [95%CI 1.08–7.50], p = 0.035). Going off‐protocol was, however, not associated with more relapse or death. Patients in the CLO arm showed a trend towards an increased rate of MRD‐negativity compared with control patients (HR MRD‐negativity: 1.35 [0.95–1.91], p = 0.10), which did not translate into a significant survival benefit. Conclusion We conclude that the intermediate states, i.e., going off‐protocol and MRD‐negativity, were affected by adding CLO, but these transitions were not associated with subsequent survival estimates, suggesting relatively modest antileukemic activity in ALL.

Pretransplant conditioning with Fludarabine (Flu)-Busulfan (Bu) is safe, but clofarabine (Clo) has improved antileukemic activity. Hypothesis: Flu+Clo-Bu (FCB) yields superior progression-free survival (PFS) after allogeneic transplantation. We randomized 250 AML/MDS patients aged 3-70, Karnofsky Score ≥80, with matched donors, to FCB (n = 120) or Flu-Bu (n = 130), stratifying complete remission (CR) vs. No CR, (NCR). HCT-CI scores varied, from 0 to 10. All evaluable patients engrafted. Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range: 58-80). Three-year relapse incidence (RI), 25% with FCB, vs. 39% with Flu-Bu (p = 0.018), offset by higher non-relapse mortality, 22.6% (95%CI: 16-30.2%) vs. 12.3% (95%CI: 6.5-19%). Three-year PFS was 52% (95%CI: 44-62%) (FCB), vs. 48% (95%CI: 41-58%) (Flu-Bu). FCB benefited CR patients less, NCR patients age ≤ 60 had 3-year 34% RI (95%CI: 19-49%) (FCB) vs. 56% (95%CI: 38-70%) after Flu-Bu (p = 0.037). NCR patients >60 years had 3-year RI 10.0% (FCB), vs. 56.0%, after Flu-Bu (p = 0.003). Bayesian regression analysis including treatment-covariate interactions showed FCB superiority in NCR patients with low HCT-CI (0-2). Serious adverse event profiles were similar for the regimens. Conditioning with FCB did not improve PFS overall, but improved disease control in NCR patients, mandating confirmatory trials. Remission status and HCT-CI should be considered when using FCB.

Effective reinduction regimens are needed for children with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as outcomes remain poor. Therapeutic options are limited in this heavily pretreated patient population, many of whom have reached lifetime recommended doses of anthracycline chemotherapy. The development of effective non-anthracycline-based salvage regimens is crucial to these patients who are at significant risk of life-threatening cardiotoxicity. We previously reported results of a phase 2 trial of a clofarabine-based regimen with topotecan, vinorelbine, and thiotepa (TVTC) in patients with relapsed acute leukemias. Here we report on an expanded bicenter cohort of 33 patients,

Introduction: Clofarabine monotherapy at a dose of 52 mg/m2 per day was approved in the USA in 2004 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) in patients aged 1–21 years after at least two prior regimens. To address a post-marketing requirement for additional evidence of the clinical benefit of clofarabine in its approved indication, a meta-analysis of patient-level data was conducted. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, using the Dr.Evidence software platform, DOC Search, and Embase, to identify clinical trials with patients with R/R ALL who received clofarabine monotherapy at 52 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR). Secondary endpoints were overall remission (OR, defined by CR or CR with either incomplete platelet recovery or incomplete neutrophil and platelet recovery), duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 754 patients in 12 clinical studies were analyzed including 682 patients with R/R ALL treated with clofarabine monotherapy at 52 mg/m2; of them, 374 were aged < 22 years (pediatric population). Rates of CR and OR were 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7, 26) and 28% (95% CI 20, 37), respectively, in the pediatric population and 12% (95% CI 5, 21) and 21% (95% CI 13, 31) in the overall population. Median OS (evaluable in three studies in pediatric patients) was 3.7 months (95% CI 0.1, 31.4), reaching 10.1 months (95% CI 0.3, 68.9) for those achieving OR. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were liver abnormalities, anemia, diarrhea, and febrile neutropenia. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, CR duration and median OS in pediatric patients with R/R ALL appeared to be slightly longer than in the phase II study. No new safety signals were identified. Results support the use of clofarabine monotherapy in its approved indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]