Search

BACKGROUND: Children with relapsed central nervous system (CNS tumors), neuroblastoma, sarcomas, and other rare solid tumors face poor outcomes. This prospective clinical trial examined the feasibility of combining genomic and transcriptomic profiling of tumor samples with a molecular tumor board (MTB) approach to make real‑time treatment decisions for children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Subjects were divided into three strata: stratum 1-relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma; stratum 2-relapsed/refractory CNS tumors; and stratum 3-relapsed/refractory rare solid tumors. Tumor samples were sent for tumor/normal whole-exome (WES) and tumor whole-transcriptome (WTS) sequencing, and the genomic data were used in a multi-institutional MTB to make real‑time treatment decisions. The MTB recommended plan allowed for a combination of up to 4 agents. Feasibility was measured by time to completion of genomic sequencing, MTB review and initiation of treatment. Response was assessed after every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patient clinical benefit was calculated by the sum of the CR, PR, SD, and NED subjects divided by the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), no evidence of disease (NED), and progressive disease (PD) subjects. Grade 3 and higher related and unexpected adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for safety evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 186 eligible patients were enrolled with 144 evaluable for safety and 124 evaluable for response. The average number of days from biopsy to initiation of the MTB-recommended combination therapy was 38 days. Patient benefit was exhibited in 65% of all subjects, 67% of neuroblastoma subjects, 73% of CNS tumor subjects, and 60% of rare tumor subjects. There was little associated toxicity above that expected for the MGT drugs used during this trial, suggestive of the safety of utilizing this method of selecting combination targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a comprehensive sequencing model to guide personalized therapy for patients with any relapsed/refractory solid malignancy. Personalized therapy was well tolerated, and the clinical benefit rate of 65% in these heavily pretreated populations suggests that this treatment strategy could be an effective option for relapsed and refractory pediatric cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02162732. Prospectively registered on June 11, 2014.

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Medulloblastoma is a central nerves tumor that often occurs in pediatrics. The main radiotherapy technique for this tumor type is craniospinal irradiation (CSI), through which the whole brain and spinal cord are exposed to radiation. Due to the immaturity of healthy organs in pediatrics, radiogenic side effects such as second cancer are more severe. Accordingly, the current study aimed to evaluate the risk of secondary cancer development in healthy organs following CSI. Seven organs at risk (OARs) including skin, eye lens, thyroid, lung, liver, stomach, bladder, colon, and gonads were considered and the dose received by each OAR during CSI was measured inside an anthropomorphic RANDO phantom by TLDs. Then, the mean obtained dose for each organ was used to estimate the probability of secondary malignancy development according to the recommended cancer risk coefficients for specific organs. The results demonstrated that the stomach and colon are at high risk of secondary malignancy occurrence, while the skin has the lowest probability of secondary cancer development. The total received dose after the treatment course by all considered organs was lower than the corresponding tolerable dose levels. From the results, it can be concluded that some OARs during CSI are highly at risk of secondary cancer development. This issue may be of concern due to organ immaturity in pediatrics which can intensify the radiogenic effects of radiation exposure. Accordingly, strict shielding the OARs during craniospinal radiotherapy and/or sparing them from the radiation field through modern techniques such as hadron therapy is highly recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: A major obstacle in translating the therapeutic potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells to children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors is the blood–brain barrier. To overcome this limitation, preclinical and clinical studies have supported the use of repeated, locoregional intracranial CAR T-cell delivery. However, there is limited literature available describing the process for the involvement of an investigational drug service (IDS) pharmacy, particularly in the setting of a children’s hospital with outpatient dosing for CNS tumors. OBJECTIVES: To describe Seattle Children’s Hospital’s experience in clinically producing CAR T cells and the implementation of IDS pharmacy practices used to deliver more than 300 intracranial CAR T-cell doses to children, as well as to share how we refined the processing techniques from CAR T-cell generation to the thawing of fractionated doses for intracranial delivery. METHODS: Autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were collected and transduced to express HER2, EGFR, or B7-H3–specific CAR T cells. Cryopreserved CAR T cells were thawed by the IDS pharmacy before intracranial delivery to patients with recurrent/refractory CNS tumors or with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma/diffuse midline glioma. RESULTS: The use of a thaw-and-dilute procedure for cryopreserved individual CAR T-cell doses provides reliable viability and is more efficient than typical thaw-and-wash protocols. Cell viability with the thaw-and-dilute protocol was approximately 75% and was always within 10% of the viability assessed at cryopreservation. Cell viability was preserved through 6 hours after thawing, which exceeded the 1-hour time frame from thawing to infusion. CONCLUSION: As the field of adoptive immunotherapy grows and continues to bring hope to patients with fatal CNS malignancies, it is critical to focus on improving the preparatory steps for CAR T-cell delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Annexins, a group of Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins, exert diverse roles in neuronal development, normal central nervous system (CNS) functioning, neurological disorders, and CNS tumors. This paper reviews the roles of individual annexins (A1-A13) in these contexts. Annexins possess unique structural and functional features, such as Ca2+-dependent binding to phospholipids, participating in membrane organization, and modulating cell signaling. They are implicated in various CNS processes, including endocytosis, exocytosis, and stabilization of plasma membranes. Annexins exhibit dynamic roles in neuronal development, influencing differentiation, proliferation, and synaptic formation in CNS tissues. Notably, annexins such as ANXA1 and ANXA2 play roles in apoptosis and blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and depression, involve annexin dysregulation, influencing neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier integrity, and stress responses. Moreover, annexins contribute to the pathogenesis of CNS tumors, either promoting or suppressing tumor growth, angiogenesis, and invasion. Annexin expression patterns vary across different CNS tumor types, providing potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. This review underscores the multifaceted roles of annexins in the CNS, highlighting their importance in normal functioning, disease progression, and potential therapeutic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Basal duct-like recess (DR) sign serves as a specific marker of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs) of the strictly third-ventricular (3 V) topography. Origins of this sign are poorly understood with limited validation in external cohorts. Methods: In this retrospective study, MRIs of pathologically proven PCPs were reviewed and evaluated for tumor topography, DR sign prevalence, and morphological subtypes. Results: Twenty-three cases with 24 MRIs satisfied our inclusion criteria. Median age was 44.5 years with a predominant male distribution (M/F ratio 4.7:1). Overall, strictly 3 V was the commonest tumor topography (8/24, 33.3%), and tumors were most commonly solid-cystic (10/24, 41.7%). The prevalence of DR sign was 21.7% (5/23 cases), all with strictly 3 V topography and with a predominantly solid consistency. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of the DR sign for strict 3 V topography was 62.5%, 100%, 100% and 84.2% respectively. New pertinent findings associated with the DR sign were observed in our cohort. This included development of the cleft-like variant of DR sign after a 9-year follow-up initially absent at baseline imaging. Additionally, cystic dilatation of the basal tumor cleft at the pituitary stalk-tumor junction and presence of a vascular structure overlapping the DR sign were noted. Relevant mechanisms, hypotheses, and implications were explored. Conclusion: We confirm the DR sign as a highly specific marker of the strictly 3 V topography in PCPs. While embryological and molecular factors remain pertinent in understanding origins of the DR sign, non-embryological mechanisms may play a role in development of the cleft-like variant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the primary modality for diagnosing and evaluating central nervous system (CNS) tumors, transitioning from structural to functional assessment. Advanced MRI techniques, including MR spectroscopy and perfusion imaging, offer insights into functional, metabolic, and hemodynamic changes in addition to structural abnormalities. The study aims to assess the role of PSR (Post-Contrast Signal Recovery) alongside rCBV (Relative Cerebral Blood Volume) and rPSR (Relative Percentage of Signal Recovery) in differentiating grade IV glioma, solitary brain metastasis, and primary CNS lymphoma. Materials and Methods: An observational study was conducted on 38 patients with lymphoma, metastases, and grade IV glioma, utilizing DSC (Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced) perfusion imaging and histopathology reports. Sociodemographic, clinical, and MRI parameters were collected. PSR measurements were obtained from perfusion maps using dedicated software. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0. Results: Among the study population, the mean age was 54.16±12.47, with male predominance (63.2%). Conventional imaging characteristics revealed significant differences, including T2 hypo intensity in lymphoma and FLAIR hyperintensity in all gliomas. Perfusion parameters showed higher rCBV in metastases and grade IV glioma compared to lymphoma, whereas PSR and rPSR were higher in lymphoma. PSR and rPSR effectively differentiated among the tumor types (p

Introduction: Data on medulloblastoma outcomes and experiences in low- and middle-income countries, especially in Latin America, is limited. This study examines challenges in Mexico's healthcare system, focusing on assessing outcomes for children with medulloblastoma in a tertiary care setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, involving 284 patients treated at 21 pediatric oncology centers in Mexico. Results: High-risk patients exhibited markedly lower event-free survival than standard-risk patients (43.5% vs. 78.3%, p<0.001). Influential factors on survival included anaplastic subtype (HR 2.4, p=0.003), metastatic disease (HR 1.9, p=0.001); residual tumor >1.5cm², and lower radiotherapy doses significantly impacted event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Platinum-based chemotherapy showed better results compared to the ICE protocol in terms of OS and EFS, which was associated with higher toxicity. Patients under 3 years old displayed notably lower OS and EFS compared to older children (36.1% vs. 55.9%, p=0.01). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to discuss a wide variety of novel therapies recently studied or actively undergoing study in patients with glioblastoma. This review also discusses current and future strategies for improving clinical trial design in patients with glioblastoma to maximize efficacy in discovering effective treatments. Recent Findings: Over the years, there has been significant expansion in therapy modalities studied in patients with glioblastoma. These therapies include, but are not limited to, targeted molecular therapies, DNA repair pathway targeted therapies, immunotherapies, vaccine therapies, and surgically targeted radiotherapies. Summary: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and unfortunately remains with poor overall survival following the current standard of care. Given the dismal prognosis, significant clinical and research efforts are ongoing with the goal of improving patient outcomes and enhancing quality and quantity of life utilizing a wide variety of novel therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the evolving landscape of ependymoma classification, which integrates histological, molecular, and anatomical context, we detail a rare case divergent from the usual histopathological spectrum. We present the case of a 37‐year‐old man with symptomatic spinal cord compression at the L3–L4 level. Neuroradiological evaluation revealed an intradural, encapsulated mass. Histologically, the tumor displayed atypical features: bizarre pleomorphic giant cells, intranuclear inclusions, mitotic activity, and a profusion of eosinophilic cytoplasm with hyalinized vessels, deviating from the characteristic perivascular pseudorosettes or myxopapillary patterns. Immunohistochemical staining bolstered this divergence, marking the tumor cells positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein and epithelial membrane antigen with a characteristic ring‐like pattern, and CD99 but negative for Olig‐2. These markers, alongside methylation profiling, facilitated its classification as a myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE), despite the atypical histologic features. This profile underscores the necessity of a multifaceted diagnostic process, especially when histological presentation is uncommon, confirming the critical role of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics in classifying morphologically ambiguous ependymomas and exemplifying the histological diversity within MPEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors originate from the spinal cord or brain. The study showed that even with aggressive treatment, malignant CNS tumors have high mortality rates. However, CNS tumor risk factors and molecular mechanisms have not been verified. Due to the reasons mentioned above, diagnosis and treatment of CNS tumors in clinical practice are currently fraught with difficulties. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), single‐stranded ncRNAs with covalently closed continuous structures, are essential to CNS tumor development. Growing evidence has proved the numeral critical biological functions of circRNAs for disease progression: sponging to miRNAs, regulating gene transcription and splicing, interacting with proteins, encoding proteins/peptides, and expressing in exosomes. Aims: This review aims to summarize current progress regarding the molecular mechanism of circRNA in CNS tumors and to explore the possibilities of clinical application based on circRNA in CNS tumors. Methods: We have summarized studies of circRNA in CNS tumors in Pubmed. Results: This review summarized their connection with CNS tumors and their functions, biogenesis, and biological properties. Furthermore, we introduced current advances in clinical RNA‐related technologies. Then we discussed the diagnostic and therapeutic potential (especially for immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) of circRNA in CNS tumors in the context of the recent advanced research and application of RNA in clinics. Conclusions: CircRNA are increasingly proven to participate in decveloping CNS tumors. An in‐depth study of the causal mechanisms of circRNAs in CNS tomor progression will ultimately advance their implementation in the clinic and developing new strategies for preventing and treating CNS tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of primary and secondary CNS neoplasms of dogs and cats relies on histologic examination of autopsy or biopsy samples. In addition, many neoplasms must be further characterized by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for a more refined diagnosis in specific cases. Given the many investigations assessing the diagnostic and prognostic IHC profile of CNS neoplasms in the veterinary literature, it may be difficult for the diagnostic pathologist or pathology trainee to narrow the list of reliable diagnostic IHCs when facing a challenging case. Here we compile a comprehensive list of the most diagnostically relevant immunomarkers that should be utilized for the diagnostic support or confirmation of the most common primary and secondary CNS neoplasms of dogs and cats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advances in molecular diagnostics led to improved targeted interventions in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors. However, the capacity to test for these is limited in LMICs, and thus their value needs exploration. Methods: We reviewed our experience with NGS testing (TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer-seq panel) for pediatric CNS tumors at KHCC/Jordan (March/2022-April/2023). Paraffin blocks' scrolls were shipped to the SickKids laboratory based on the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) recommendations. We reviewed the patients' characteristics, the tumor types, and the NGS results' impact on treatment. Results: Of 237 patients discussed during the MDC meetings, 32 patients (14%) were included. They were 16 boys and 16 girls; the median age at time of testing was 9.5 years (range, 0.9-21.9 years). There were 21 samples sent at diagnosis and 11 upon tumor progression. The main diagnoses were low-grade-glioma (15), high-grade-glioma (10), and other histologies (7). Reasons to requestNGS included searching for a targetable alteration (20) and to better characterize the tumor behavior (12). The median turnaround time from samples' shipment to receiving the results was 23.5 days (range, 15-49 days) with a median laboratory processing time of 16 days (range, 8-39 days) at a cost of US$1,000/sample. There were 19 (59%) tumors that had targetable alterations (FGFR/MAPK pathway inhibitors (14), checkpoint inhibitors (2), NTRK inhibitors (2), and one with PI3K inhibitor or IDH1 inhibitor). Two rare BRAF mutations were identified (BRAFp.G469A, BRAFp.K601E). One tumor diagnosed initially as undifferentiated round cell sarcoma harbored NAB2::STAT6 fusion and was reclassified as an aggressive metastatic solitary fibrous tumor. Another tumor initially diagnosed as grade 2 astroblastoma grade 2 was reclassified as low-grade-glioma in the absence of MN1 alteration. NGS failed to help characterize a tumor thatwas diagnosed histologically as small round blue cell tumor. Nine patients received targeted therapy; dabrafenib/trametinib (6), pembrolizumab (2), and entrectinib (1), mostly upon tumor progression (7). Conclusion: In this highly selective cohort, a high percentage of targetable mutations was identified facilitating targeted therapies. Outsourcing of NGS testing was feasible; however, criteria for case selection are needed. In addition, local capacity-building in conducting the test, interpretation of the results, and access to "new drugs" continue to be a challenge in LMICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exosomes are naturally present extracellular vesicles (EVs) released into the surrounding body fluids upon the fusion of polycystic and plasma membranes. They facilitate intercellular communication by transporting DNA, mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, circular RNA, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. They contribute to the onset and progression of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors. In addition, they can be used as biomarkers of tumor proliferation, migration, and blood vessel formation, thereby affecting the Tumor Microenvironment (TME). This paper reviews the recent advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of exosomes in various CNS tumors, the promise and challenges of exosomes as natural carriers of CNS tumors, and the therapeutic prospects of exosomes in CNS tumors. Furthermore, we hope this research can contribute to the development of more targeted and effective treatments for central nervous system tumors.

Abstract Background Children with relapsed central nervous system (CNS tumors), neuroblastoma, sarcomas, and other rare solid tumors face poor outcomes. This prospective clinical trial examined the feasibility of combining genomic and transcriptomic profiling of tumor samples with a molecular tumor board (MTB) approach to make real‑time treatment decisions for children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Methods Subjects were divided into three strata: stratum 1—relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma; stratum 2—relapsed/refractory CNS tumors; and stratum 3—relapsed/refractory rare solid tumors. Tumor samples were sent for tumor/normal whole-exome (WES) and tumor whole-transcriptome (WTS) sequencing, and the genomic data were used in a multi-institutional MTB to make real‑time treatment decisions. The MTB recommended plan allowed for a combination of up to 4 agents. Feasibility was measured by time to completion of genomic sequencing, MTB review and initiation of treatment. Response was assessed after every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patient clinical benefit was calculated by the sum of the CR, PR, SD, and NED subjects divided by the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), no evidence of disease (NED), and progressive disease (PD) subjects. Grade 3 and higher related and unexpected adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for safety evaluation. Results A total of 186 eligible patients were enrolled with 144 evaluable for safety and 124 evaluable for response. The average number of days from biopsy to initiation of the MTB-recommended combination therapy was 38 days. Patient benefit was exhibited in 65% of all subjects, 67% of neuroblastoma subjects, 73% of CNS tumor subjects, and 60% of rare tumor subjects. There was little associated toxicity above that expected for the MGT drugs used during this trial, suggestive of the safety of utilizing this method of selecting combination targeted therapy. Conclusions This trial demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a comprehensive sequencing model to guide personalized therapy for patients with any relapsed/refractory solid malignancy. Personalized therapy was well tolerated, and the clinical benefit rate of 65% in these heavily pretreated populations suggests that this treatment strategy could be an effective option for relapsed and refractory pediatric cancers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02162732. Prospectively registered on June 11, 2014.

Purpose: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancies in children worldwide, including in Armenia. The current study aims to analyze epidemiological data, treatment, and outcomes of children and young adults (≤25 years) with CNS tumors in Armenia during the last 26 years. Methods: We collected data from pediatric and young adult patients treated in selected sites in Armenia from 1st January 1995 to 31st December 2020. Incidence by sex, age at diagnosis, time from first complaints to diagnosis, histopathology results, treatment strategies, complications, and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated. Results: The multicenter data analysis revealed 149 patients with diagnosed primary CNS tumors over 26 years. Among them, 84 (56.4%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (range, 3 months to 25 years), and the median time from the first complaints to diagnosis was 2 months (range, 1 week to 70 months). Medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors (47), low-grade gliomas (32), and high-grade gliomas (22) were the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. Ependymomas, craniopharyngiomas, germ cell tumors, and other malignancies were observed in 22 patients. For 26 patients, no histopathological or radiological diagnosis was available. Follow-up information was available for 98 (65.8%) patients. The 5-year OS rate for the whole study group was 67.7%. Conclusion: Consistent with international data, embryonal tumors, and gliomas were the most commonly diagnosed CNS malignancies in Armenia. Multimodal treatment was often not available in Armenia during the study period, especially for early cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Molecular profiling has transformed the diagnostic workflow of CNS tumors during the last years. The latest WHO classification of CNS tumors (5th edition), published in 2021, pushed forward the integration between histopathological features and molecular hallmarks to achieve reproducible and clinically relevant diagnoses. To address these demands, pathologists have to appropriately deal with multiple molecular assays mainly including DNA methylation profiling and DNA/RNA next generation sequencing. Tumor classification by DNA methylation profiling is now a critical tool for many diagnostic tasks in neuropathology including the assessment of complex cases, to evaluate novel tumor types and to perform tumor subgrouping in hetereogenous entities like medulloblastoma or ependymoma. DNA/RNA NGS allow the detection of multiple molecular alterations including single nucleotide variations, small insertions/deletions (InDel), and gene fusions. These molecular markers can provide key insights for diagnosis, for example, if a tumor-specific mutation is detected, but also for treatment since targeted therapies are progressively entering the clinical practice. In the present review, a brief, but comprehensive overview of these tools will be provided, discussing their technical specifications, diagnostic value, and potential limitations. Moreover, the importance of molecular profiling will be shown in a representative series of CNS neoplasms including both the most frequent tumor types and other selected entities for which molecular characterization plays a critical role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last 2 decades, high throughput genome-wide molecular profiling has revealed characteristic genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with different types of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. DNA methylation profiling has emerged as an important molecular platform for CNS tumor classification with improved diagnostic accuracy and patient risk stratification in comparison to the standard of care histopathological analysis and any single molecular tests. The emergence of DNA methylation arrays have also played a crucial role in refining existing types and the discovery of new tumor types or subtypes. The adoption of methylation data into neuro-oncology has been greatly aided by the development of a freely accessible machine learning-based classifier. In this review, we discuss methylation workflow, address the utility of DNA methylation profiling in CNS tumors in a routine diagnostic setting, and provide an overview of the methylation-based tumor types and new types or subtypes identified with this platform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionData on medulloblastoma outcomes and experiences in low- and middle-income countries, especially in Latin America, is limited. This study examines challenges in Mexico’s healthcare system, focusing on assessing outcomes for children with medulloblastoma in a tertiary care setting.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted, involving 284 patients treated at 21 pediatric oncology centers in Mexico.ResultsHigh-risk patients exhibited markedly lower event-free survival than standard-risk patients (43.5% vs. 78.3%, p1.5cm², and lower radiotherapy doses significantly impacted event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Platinum-based chemotherapy showed better results compared to the ICE protocol in terms of OS and EFS, which was associated with higher toxicity. Patients under 3 years old displayed notably lower OS and EFS compared to older children (36.1% vs. 55.9%, p=0.01).

This document is an editorial published in the journal Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. It discusses the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pediatric brain tumors and the integration of morphology and molecular biology in diagnosing and treating these tumors. The editorial highlights several original contributions and reviews related to the WHO classification and its implications for diagnosis, prognosis, stratification, and targeted therapies. The authors emphasize the importance of molecular profiling and personalized therapy in treating pediatric brain tumors. They also discuss the need for collaboration between pediatric and adult neuro-oncologists and the importance of appropriate molecular testing and age-inclusive clinical trials. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract Mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) include numerous entities, with different pathological features and biological behavior. Mesenchymal non-meningothelial tumors are rare and comprise neoplasms that are exclusive to the CNS or show peculiar features when occurring in the CNS compared with other sites. Within this group there are three new entities, classified on the basis of specific molecular alterations and included in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors: primary intracranial sarcoma; DICER1-mutant; CIC-rearranged sarcoma; intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET::CREB fusion-positive. These tumors often show variable morphology, making diagnosis very challenging, although the implementation of molecular techniques has led to better characterization and more precise identification of these entities. However, many molecular alterations have yet to be discovered and some recently reported CNS tumors are currently missing an appropriate classification. Herein, we report the case of a 43-year-old man who presented with an intracranial mesenchymal tumor. Histopathological examination showed a wide spectrum of peculiar morphological features and a non-specific immunohistochemical profile. Whole transcriptome sequencing revealed the presence of a novel genetic rearrangement involving COX14 and PTEN genes, which has never been reported before in any other neoplasm. The tumor did not cluster in any defined methylation class of the brain tumor classifier, but resulted in a calibrated score of 0.89 for the methylation class “Sarcoma, MPNST-like”, when analyzed by the sarcoma classifier. Our study is the first to report about this tumor with unique pathological and molecular features, characterized by a novel rearrangement between COX14 and PTEN genes. Other studies are necessary in order to define it as a new entity or as a novel rearrangement involving recently described and incompletely characterized CNS mesenchymal tumors.

IntroductionAdvances in molecular diagnostics led to improved targeted interventions in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors. However, the capacity to test for these is limited in LMICs, and thus their value needs exploration.MethodsWe reviewed our experience with NGS testing (TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer-seq panel) for pediatric CNS tumors at KHCC/Jordan (March/2022–April/2023). Paraffin blocks’ scrolls were shipped to the SickKids laboratory based on the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) recommendations. We reviewed the patients’ characteristics, the tumor types, and the NGS results’ impact on treatment.ResultsOf 237 patients discussed during the MDC meetings, 32 patients (14%) were included. They were 16 boys and 16 girls; the median age at time of testing was 9.5 years (range, 0.9–21.9 years). There were 21 samples sent at diagnosis and 11 upon tumor progression. The main diagnoses were low-grade-glioma (15), high-grade-glioma (10), and other histologies (7). Reasons to request NGS included searching for a targetable alteration (20) and to better characterize the tumor behavior (12). The median turnaround time from samples’ shipment to receiving the results was 23.5 days (range, 15–49 days) with a median laboratory processing time of 16 days (range, 8–39 days) at a cost of US$1,000/sample. There were 19 (59%) tumors that had targetable alterations (FGFR/MAPK pathway inhibitors (14), checkpoint inhibitors (2), NTRK inhibitors (2), and one with PI3K inhibitor or IDH1 inhibitor). Two rare BRAF mutations were identified (BRAFp.G469A, BRAFp.K601E). One tumor diagnosed initially as undifferentiated round cell sarcoma harbored NAB2::STAT6 fusion and was reclassified as an aggressive metastatic solitary fibrous tumor. Another tumor initially diagnosed as grade 2 astroblastoma grade 2 was reclassified as low-grade-glioma in the absence of MN1 alteration. NGS failed to help characterize a tumor that was diagnosed histologically as small round blue cell tumor. Nine patients received targeted therapy; dabrafenib/trametinib (6), pembrolizumab (2), and entrectinib (1), mostly upon tumor progression (7).ConclusionIn this highly selective cohort, a high percentage of targetable mutations was identified facilitating targeted therapies. Outsourcing of NGS testing was feasible; however, criteria for case selection are needed. In addition, local capacity-building in conducting the test, interpretation of the results, and access to “new drugs” continue to be a challenge in LMICs.

Introduction: Technical advances and the increasing role of interdisciplinary decision-making may warrant formal definitions of expertise in surgical neuro-oncology. Research question: The EANS Neuro-oncology Section felt that a survey detailing the European neurosurgical perspective on the concept of expertise in surgical neuro-oncology might be helpful. Material and methods: The EANS Neuro-oncology Section panel developed an online survey asking questions regarding criteria for expertise in neuro-oncological surgery and sent it to all individual EANS members. Results: Our questionnaire was completed by 251 respondents (consultants: 80.1%) from 42 countries. 67.7% would accept a lifetime caseload of >200 cases and 86.7% an annual caseload of >50 as evidence of neuro-oncological surgical expertise. A majority felt that surgeons who do not treat children (56.2%), do not have experience with spinal fusion (78.1%) or peripheral nerve tumors (71.7%) may still be considered experts. Majorities believed that expertise requires the use of skull-base approaches (85.8%), intraoperative monitoring (83.4%), awake craniotomies (77.3%), and neuro-endoscopy (75.5%) as well as continuing education of at least 1/year (100.0%), a research background (80.0%) and teaching activities (78.7%), and formal interdisciplinary collaborations (e.g., tumor board: 93.0%). Academic vs. non-academic affiliation, career position, years of neurosurgical experience, country of practice, and primary clinical interest had a minor influence on the respondents’ opinions. Discussion and conclusion: Opinions among neurosurgeons regarding the characteristics and features of expertise in neuro-oncology vary surprisingly little. Large majorities favoring certain thresholds and qualitative criteria suggest a consensus definition might be possible.

Introduction: Europe works to improve cancer management through the use of artificialintelligence (AI), and there is a need to accelerate the development of AI applications for childhood cancer. However, the current strategies used for algorithm development in childhood cancer may have bias and limited generalizability. This study reviewed existing publications on AI tools for pediatric brain tumors, Europe's most common type of childhood solid tumor, to examine the data sources for developing AI tools. Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis of the publications on AI tools for pediatric brain tumors, and we examined the type of data used, data sources, and geographic location of cohorts to evaluate the generalizability of the algorithms. Results: We screened 10503 publications, and we selected 45. A total of 34/45 publications developing AI tools focused on glial tumors, while 35/45 used MRI as a source of information to predict the classification and prognosis. The median number of patients for algorithm development was 89 for single-center studies and 120 for multicenter studies. A total of 17/45 publications used pediatric datasets from the UK. Discussion: Since the development of AI tools for pediatric brain tumors is still in its infancy, there is a need to support data exchange and collaboration between centers to increase the number of patients used for algorithm training and improve their generalizability. To this end, there is a need for increased data exchange and collaboration between centers and to explore the applicability of decentralized privacy-preserving technologies consistent with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This is particularly important in light of using the European Health Data Space and international collaborations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Pathologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Incidence, prevalence, and survival are population-based statistics describing cancer burden. The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT) specializes in tumor biology and outcomes for 12 rare CNS tumor types selected for their importance in adults, research interest, or potential for targeted treatment. The aim of this study was to update incidence, prevalence, and survival statistics for these tumors. Methods: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) database, a combined dataset of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data, was used to calculate average annual age-adjusted incidence rates (AAAIR) per 100,000 population overall and by sex, race-ethnicity, and age for diagnosis years 2008–2019. Incidence time trends were calculated for diagnosis years 2004–2019. NPCR data were used to calculate relative survival rates. Point prevalence on December 31, 2019 was estimated using annual age-specific incidence and survival. Results: AAAIR was 1.47 per 100,000 for these tumors combined, with highest incidence in ependymomas (AAAIR = 0.41/100,000). Most tumor types were more common in males, adults (ages 40 + years) or children (ages < 15 years), and non-Hispanic White individuals. Ependymomas were the most prevalent tumor type (19,320 cases) followed by oligodendrogliomas (14,900 cases). Ependymomas had the highest five-year survival (90.6%) and primary CNS sarcomas the lowest (7.7%). Conclusions: These data provide means to measure the impact of clinical care and evaluate new therapies and the evolving histopathology definitions in rare CNS tumor types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has changed greatly. The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) and other institutions have analyzed the incidence rate and characteristics of primary CNS tumors. However, there are limited studies analyzing the incidence rate and characteristics of CNS tumors in China. To better understand CNS tumors in China, we summarized all primary CNS tumors diagnosed pathologically in a single center from 2003 to 2019. All patients with primary CNS tumors who underwent neurosurgery at our hospital from January 2003 to December 2019 were included in this study. The data were collected from the hospital information system, including diagnosis time, age, gender, anatomic sites, and pathologic results. A total of 17,226 cases of primary CNS tumors were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Among all cases, the major tumor types included meningiomas, tumors of neuroepithelial tissue, and pituitary adenomas. Most tumors of neuroepithelial tissue were glioblastoma and astrocytoma. Most tumors of neuroepithelial tissue were located in the frontal lobe. However, grade 4 tumors of neuroepithelial tissue were more common in the temporal lobe. The median age of all patients was 46 years. The incidence of CNS tumors was higher in women than in men. Based on this data set, we analyzed various parameters of CNS tumors and found that grade 4 tumors of neuroepithelial tissue were more common in the temporal lobe, which were rarely reported in previous articles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has emerged as an important diagnostic tool that complements histopathology for characterizing central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The literature describing its application in Asian countries is limited. We report the feasibility and utility of adopting such profiling for children with diagnosed CNS tumors in Hong Kong. The study included samples of 97 patients with CNS embryonal or high-grade neuroepithelial tumors (HGNETs). In our DNA methylation-profiled cohort, 67% of results correlated with the diagnosis and assigned molecular subgroup and 12% of results led to revision/reassignment of diagnosis. Patient outcomes correlated significantly with methylation-based subgroups. In addition, novel clinical–histologic–molecular associations were described. Taken together, epigenomic profiling enabled clinically relevant refinement of disease classification of pediatric CNS tumors. The availability of such methodology in Asia sets the stage for international collaborations in molecularly driven trials. This paper examines the link between CNS tumor biology and heterogeneity and the use of genome-wide DNA methylation profiling as a clinical diagnostic platform. CNS tumors are the most common solid tumors in children, and their prognosis remains poor. This study retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients with CNS embryonal tumors in Hong Kong between 1999 and 2017, using data from the territory-wide registry and available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. After processing archival tumor tissue via DNA extraction, quantification, and methylation profiling, the data were analyzed by using the web-based DKFZ classifier (Molecular Neuropathology (MNP) 2.0 v11b4) and t-SNE analysis. Methylation profiles were deemed informative in 85 samples. Epigenetic data allowed molecular subgrouping and confirmed diagnosis in 65 samples, verified histologic diagnosis in 8, and suggested an alternative diagnosis in 12. This study demonstrates the potential of DNA methylation profiling in characterizing pediatric CNS embryonal tumors in a large cohort from Hong Kong, which should enable regional and international collaboration in future pediatric neuro-oncology research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Of all childhood cancers, adult survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are at the highest risk for late mortality as well as neurocognitive, physical, and psychosocial late effects. Their identity with cancer survivorship, the relationship of their identity to health outcomes, and how their identity differs from other childhood cancer survivors is poorly understood. Methods: A total of 127 young adults previously treated for pediatric CNS tumors enrolled in Project REACH, a locally-treated childhood cancer survivor cohort. Participants completed self-report measures on the effects of cancer on identity, someone who had cancer, victim and survivor identity, frequency of thoughts of diagnosis, and health outcomes. Results: The majority of participants identified as a survivor (83%). Survivor identity was linked to diagnosis and treatment but not health outcomes. A minority (9%) endorsed a victim identity, and they were more likely to have poorer mental health (p = 0.03) and depression (p = 0.04) than non-victims. Participants who reported a stronger effect of cancer on their identity also had poorer mental health (p = 0.005). A higher frequency of diagnosis-related thoughts was associated with significantly poorer mental health (p < 0.001), more severe anxiety (p = 0.008), depression (p < 0.001), and neurocognitive impairments (p < 0.01). Those who experienced relapse, radiation, and/or chemotherapy were more likely to identify as someone who had cancer, independent of diagnosis. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Our findings suggest the relationships previously reported between identity and sociodemographic, treatment, and health outcomes after adult and pediatric non-CNS cancers cannot be generalized to pediatric CNS tumors. Understanding the unique features of how this population identifies is important for patient-centered care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionEurope works to improve cancer management through the use of artificialintelligence (AI), and there is a need to accelerate the development of AI applications for childhood cancer. However, the current strategies used for algorithm development in childhood cancer may have bias and limited generalizability. This study reviewed existing publications on AI tools for pediatric brain tumors, Europe's most common type of childhood solid tumor, to examine the data sources for developing AI tools.MethodsWe performed a bibliometric analysis of the publications on AI tools for pediatric brain tumors, and we examined the type of data used, data sources, and geographic location of cohorts to evaluate the generalizability of the algorithms.ResultsWe screened 10503 publications, and we selected 45. A total of 34/45 publications developing AI tools focused on glial tumors, while 35/45 used MRI as a source of information to predict the classification and prognosis. The median number of patients for algorithm development was 89 for single-center studies and 120 for multicenter studies. A total of 17/45 publications used pediatric datasets from the UK.DiscussionSince the development of AI tools for pediatric brain tumors is still in its infancy, there is a need to support data exchange and collaboration between centers to increase the number of patients used for algorithm training and improve their generalizability. To this end, there is a need for increased data exchange and collaboration between centers and to explore the applicability of decentralized privacy-preserving technologies consistent with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This is particularly important in light of using the European Health Data Space and international collaborations.

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children comprise a highly heterogenous and complex group of diseases. Historically, diagnosis and confirmation of these tumors were routinely based on histological examination. However, recently obtained data demonstrate that such a diagnostic approach is not completely accurate and could lead to misdiagnosis. Also, in recent times, the quantity and quality of molecular diagnostic methods have greatly improved, which influences the current classification methods and treatment approach for pediatric CNS tumors. Nowadays, molecular methods, such as DNA methylation profiling, are an integral part of diagnosing brain and spinal tumors in children. In this paper, we present the case of an infant with a posterior fossa tumor who demonstrated a non-specific morphology and whose diagnosis was verified only after DNA methylation.

Tumors of the Central nervous System (CNS) are a spectrum of neoplasms that range from benign lesions to highly malignant and aggressive lesions. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment approaches, the morbidity and mortality are high with dismal survival outcomes in these malignant tumors. Moreover, the non-specificity of conventional treatments substantiates the rationale for precise therapeutic strategies that selectively target infiltrating tumor cells within the brain, and minimize systemic and collateral damage. With the recent advancement of nanoplatforms for biomaterials applications, lipid-based nanoparticulate systems present an attractive and breakthrough impact on CNS tumor management. Lipid nanoparticles centered immunotherapeutic agents treating malignant CNS tumors could convene the clear need for precise treatment strategies. Immunotherapeutic agents can selectively induce specific immune responses by active or innate immune responses at the local site within the brain. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic applications of lipid-based nanoplatforms for CNS tumors with an emphasis on revolutionary approaches in brain targeting, imaging, and drug and gene delivery with immunotherapy. Lipid-based nanoparticle platforms represent one of the most promising colloidal carriers for chemotherapeutic, and immunotherapeutic drugs. Their current application in oncology especially in brain tumors has brought about a paradigm shift in cancer treatment by improving the antitumor activity of several agents that could be used to selectively target brain tumors. Subsequently, the lab-to-clinic transformation and challenges towards translational feasibility of lipid-based nanoplatforms for drug and gene/immunotherapy delivery in the context of CNS tumor management is addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of Central Nervous System tumors is low in India when compared to western countries. Now a days, the increase in incidence may be due to improved diagnosis with advancement of studies. They have a wide spectrum clinically and histopathologically. Aims And Objectives: This study aims to provide the spectrum of CNS tumors histologically and clinically, along with radiological correlation, To analyse various histological types of Cranial and spinal tumors, to evaluate age and gender distribution and topography of tumors. Materials And Methods: A retrospective study was performed in the department of pathology, for a period of 18 months. The data and Hematoxylin and Eosin stainedslides were retrieved from the archives, the cases were analysed and graded according to 2021WHO grading system. Results And Conclusion: out of 76 CNS tumors, most common were Intracranialtumors 85.5% (65) cases and Spinal tumors were 14.4% (11) cases. There is male preponderance, 44 cases (57.8%)Majority were in 45 to 60 years. Tumors were more common on right side, 61% (47 cases) and most common location was cerebellopontine angle 13.1.% (10 cases) followed by frontal region 11.8% (9 cases). The most common histological type were Astrocytomas, followed by Meningiomas. WHO Grade I tumors are more common, 24.6% followed by Grade II, 21.7%. Most common tumors inchildren were Medulloblastomas (Grade IV). Three cases of secondary deposit from epithelial malignancy were also included in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: Brain tumors are the most frequent solid tumors in children. High-grade tumors are more challenging in diagnosis. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) may be mistaken for other high-grade brain tumors. Molecular genetic analysis of ATRT has shown deletion and mutation in the hSNF5/INI1 gene in most of the cases. The INI1 protein expression can be helpful for the accurate diagnosis. Methods: In this study, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) using INI1 antibody was performed to determine the possibility of ATRT misdiagnosis. Totally, 147 tumors including 6 ATRTs, 81 medulloblastomas, and 60 other CNS tumors were examined in children between 0 and 17 years old. Results: No nuclear staining was found in the six ATRT cases, while most of other CNS tumors demonstrated nuclear staining. Five cases were previously diagnosed with medulloblastoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), and anaplastic oligodendroglioma, while the diagnoses were changed to ATRT based on the reevaluation of the H&E slides and INI1 study. Additionally, two cases were recurrent tumors whose features were consistent with those of ATRT. The INI1 immunostaining was negative in these cases. Conclusion: INI1 was very helpful in distinguishing ATRT from its mimickers in challenging cases. All known ATRT cases in this study were immunonegative for INI1. Thus, INI1 is recommended to be used in the initial IHC panel for the high-grade brain tumors, especially in children under the age of three years, so that they can benefit from intensified therapeutic regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) include numerous entities, with different pathological features and biological behavior. Mesenchymal non-meningothelial tumors are rare and comprise neoplasms that are exclusive to the CNS or show peculiar features when occurring in the CNS compared with other sites. Within this group there are three new entities, classified on the basis of specific molecular alterations and included in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors: primary intracranial sarcoma; DICER1-mutant; CIC-rearranged sarcoma; intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET::CREB fusion-positive. These tumors often show variable morphology, making diagnosis very challenging, although the implementation of molecular techniques has led to better characterization and more precise identification of these entities. However, many molecular alterations have yet to be discovered and some recently reported CNS tumors are currently missing an appropriate classification. Herein, we report the case of a 43-year-old man who presented with an intracranial mesenchymal tumor. Histopathological examination showed a wide spectrum of peculiar morphological features and a non-specific immunohistochemical profile. Whole transcriptome sequencing revealed the presence of a novel genetic rearrangement involving COX14 and PTEN genes, which has never been reported before in any other neoplasm. The tumor did not cluster in any defined methylation class of the brain tumor classifier, but resulted in a calibrated score of 0.89 for the methylation class "Sarcoma, MPNST-like", when analyzed by the sarcoma classifier. Our study is the first to report about this tumor with unique pathological and molecular features, characterized by a novel rearrangement between COX14 and PTEN genes. Other studies are necessary in order to define it as a new entity or as a novel rearrangement involving recently described and incompletely characterized CNS mesenchymal tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent decades, a significant body of research has focused on targeted therapies for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors to enhance the effectiveness of management strategies. However, most of these efforts have been centered in high-income countries, which renders the generalizability of their results to low- and middle-income countries questionable. Therefore, in this review, we systematically investigated the status of research conducted on targeted therapy for CNS tumors in low- and lower-middle-income countries to elucidate the contribution of these countries in advancing neuro-oncology. A systematic search of 3 databases was performed using a predefined search strategy. After screening the articles based on our inclusion/exclusion criteria, the data were extracted to a predesigned Excel worksheet. A review of 44 included studies showed that India, Iran, and Lebanon were the only countries with a contribution to this field. All included studies were laboratory or animal experiments, and there were no clinical studies in this field. The most investigated CNS tumor was malignant glioma, and gene-targeted therapy was the most investigated category of targeted therapies in these countries. Low- and lower-middle-income countries comprise more than half of the world population, but they are deprived of targeted therapies against CNS tumors. Although there are basic experiments performed on this subject, they originate in a limited number of these countries. Therefore, targeted therapy is in its preliminary stage in these countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundPrimary CNS tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that share a considerable morbidity and mortality rate. To help control tumor growth and clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life) symptoms, patients often resort to alternative therapies, including the use of cannabis. Despite rapidly growing popularity, cannabis and its impact on patients with primary malignant CNS tumors is understudied.MethodsTo shed light on the lack of scientific evidence in this field, in November 2018 we conducted a search and examination of cannabis in neuro-oncology in major journal databases and bibliographies of selected articles, and through abstracts of annual meetings using prespecified criteria in line with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.ResultsWe identified 45 publications, of which 9 were selected. Five studies were included. Publication dates ranged from 2004 to 2018 and included varying histologies of primary brain tumors. The average survival at 1 year was 56.09% (95% CI: 48.28-63.9). There was no difference in risk ratio (RR) for death at 1 year between groups (RR: 1.069 [95% CI: 0.139-8.25]). We found strong evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 74.0%; P = .021). We found no statistical evidence of publication bias (P = .117; SD = 1.91).ConclusionsThere was limited moderate-quality evidence that supports the use of cannabinoids as adjuvant to the standard of care in the treatment of brain and CNS tumors. There was very low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with adult-onset gliomas. Further prospective clinical trials are necessary to adequately evaluate the impact of cannabinoids on CNS tumors, specifically on survival and quality of life.

BackgroundTargeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is frequently obtained at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) for clinical characterization of CNS tumors. In this study, we describe the diagnostic reliability of the Foundation Medicine (FM) targeted NGS platform and its ability to explore and identify tumor characteristics of prognostic significance in gliomas.MethodsNeuro-oncology patients seen at UCLA who have received FM testing between August 2012 and March 2019 were included in this study, and all mutations from FM test reports were recorded. Initial tumor diagnoses and diagnostic markers found via standard clinical methods were obtained from pathology reports. With overall and progression-free survival data, elastic net regularized Cox regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether any mutations of unknown significance detected by FM could predict patient outcome in glioblastoma (GBM).ResultsSix hundred and three samples tested by FM from 565 distinct patients were identified. Concordance of diagnostic markers was high between standard clinical testing methods and FM. Oligodendroglial markers detected via FM were highly correlated with 1p19q codeletion in IDH mutated gliomas. FM testing of multiple tumor samples from the same patient demonstrated temporal and spatial mutational heterogeneity. Mutations in BCORL1, ERBB4, and PALB2, which are mutations of unknown significance in GBM, were shown to be statistically significant in predicting patient outcome.ConclusionsIn our large cohort, we found that targeted NGS can both reliably and efficiently detect important diagnostic markers in CNS tumors.

Abstract Background Primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, including benign and malignant tumors. Since there are many heterogeneities in the prevalence reported in previous studies on this type of tumor, this study was performed to determine the overall prevalence of different primary CNS tumors. Method The study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching international databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of science, and the Google Scholar search engine until August 2020. After transferring the studies to information management software (EndNote) and eliminating duplicate studies, the remaining studies were reviewed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria according to three stages of primary and secondary evaluation and qualitative evaluation. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, Begg, Mazumdar, and I2 tests were used for data analysis, publication bias analysis, and heterogeneity analysis, respectively. Results After performing the systematic review steps, 80 studies were included for final analysis. Based on 8 studies, the prevalence of brain tumors was 70.9%. Also, studies on 7 other studies showed that the prevalence of spinal tumors was 12.2%. A review of 14 studies showed that the prevalence of neuroepithelial tumors was 34.7%. The analysis of 27 studies reported a prevalence of glioma tumors of 42.8%. Analyses performed on other studies showed that the prevalence of pituitary adenomas was 12.2%, embryonal tumors 3.1%, ependymal tumors 3.2%, meningiomas 24.1%, glial tumors 0.8%, astrocytic 20.3%, oligodendroglial 3.9%, glioblastoma 17.7%, schwannoma 6.7%, medulloblastoma 7.7% and Polycystic astrocytomas 3.8%. Conclusion As a result, it can be stated that brain tumors are the most common type of primary CNS tumors. It was also observed that tumors involving neuroepithelial cells are more common in patients than other types of tumors.

Abstract Background The prognosis for metastatic and recurrent tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) remains dismal, and the need for newer therapeutic targets and modalities is critical. The cell surface glycoprotein B7H3 is expressed on a range of solid tumors with a restricted expression on normal tissues. We hypothesized that compartmental radioimmunotherapy (cRIT) with the anti-B7H3 murine monoclonal antibody omburtamab injected intraventricularly could safely target CNS malignancies. Patients and methods We conducted a phase I trial of intraventricular 131I-omburtamab using a standard 3 + 3 design. Eligibility criteria included adequate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow, no major organ toxicity, and for patients > dose level 6, availability of autologous stem cells. Patients initially received 74 MBq radioiodinated omburtamab to evaluate dosimetry and biodistribution followed by therapeutic 131I-omburtamab dose-escalated from 370 to 2960 MBq. Patients were monitored clinically and biochemically for toxicity graded using CTCAEv 3.0. Dosimetry was evaluated using serial CSF and blood sampling, and serial PET or gamma-camera scans. Patients could receive a second cycle in the absence of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or progressive disease. Results Thirty-eight patients received 100 radioiodinated omburtamab injections. Diagnoses included metastatic neuroblastoma (n = 16) and other B7H3-expressing solid tumors (n = 22). Thirty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of treatment with both dosimetry and therapy doses. Acute toxicities included

Introduction: Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor. The mainstay of treatment is maximum surgical resection and craniospinal radiation, which may be followed by chemotherapy. The debilitating effect of the tumor and the intensive treatment approaches in MB lead to long-term neuropsychological, physical, and chronic medical problems. We conducted a systematic review to assess the quality of life (QoL) in the long-term survivors of MB and the factors leading to compromised QoL. Methods: We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for our review. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Digital Commons Network, and Wiley Online Library databases to search for articles having quality of life, medulloblastoma, and pediatric survivors in title or abstract. We removed duplicates and screened through titles, and full texts. Twelve articles were included in our study. Articles using and reporting all domains of PaedsQL were included in the meta-analysis. The PaedsQL scores of survivors and their caregivers were compared. Subgroup analysis was conducted for craniospinal and proton radiotherapy groups. Results: As compared to other posterior fossa tumors, MB survivors have the lowest QoL scores. There is a difference in the perception of QoL of survivors between caregivers and survivors themselves with survivors rating themselves higher in several domains. The overall PaedsQL scores were significantly different for both groups (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference between those who were treated with craniospinal or proton radiation was not significant (p = 0.76). For the subscales, physical (p = 0.005), psychosocial (p = 0.0003), and school (p = 0.03) perceptions were significantly different for the survivors and their caregivers; however, psychosocial (p = 0.80) and emotional (p = 0.93) scales were not different for the survivors or caregivers. Patient characteristics related to a worse QoL included disease severity, metastatic disease, lesser family income, smaller current ventricle size, need for permanent hydrocephalus treatment, and lesser age at diagnosis. Conclusion: An analysis of various studies, using different measures of QoL, concludes that QoL is compromised in all pediatric survivors of MB; however, the perception of QoL of the survivors is better than objective or caretaker-rated QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]