Search

Purpose: There is a high risk of increasing the posterior tibial slope (PTS) during medially opening‐wedge high tibial osteotomy (mowHTO). Most recently, the idea of intentional simultaneous coronal and sagittal correction, using uniplanar cutting techniques has emerged. This study aims to examine the influences of variable hinge positioning and osteotomy gap height on the sagittal and coronal plane. Methods: Twenty uniplanar mowHTOs were performed in standardised (left) solid‐foam proximal tibia models. In the different models, hinge position was rotated stepwise by 10°, between 90° (cutting straight medial to lateral) and 0° (cutting straight anterior to posterior) (n = 10). Additionally, gap heights of 5 and 10 mm were produced and analysed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate a predictive regression formula for the relation between gap height, hinge rotation and the changes of medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), medial and lateral PTS. Results: Between cutting angles of 90 and 20°, the MPTA was mainly influenced by the gap height (0.95° MPTA per 1 mm gap height), but not by the cutting angle. Between 20 and 0°, the MPTA was decreased by 3.6° per 10° of rotation, but not by the gap height. Between cutting angles of 90 and 10°, the PTS was increased linearly by 0.97° per 10° of rotation and by 0.61° per 1 mm gap height. Conclusion: In mowHTO with lateral hinge positions, the MPTA is mainly influenced by gap height. Changes of PTS can be avoided by a straight lateral hinge position. In posterior hinge locations (0‐20°), changes of MPTA are mainly caused by hinge rotation, but not by gap height. Level of Evidence: Level III, Case–control study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose There is a high risk of increasing the posterior tibial slope (PTS) during medially opening‐wedge high tibial osteotomy (mowHTO). Most recently, the idea of intentional simultaneous coronal and sagittal correction, using uniplanar cutting techniques has emerged. This study aims to examine the influences of variable hinge positioning and osteotomy gap height on the sagittal and coronal plane. Methods Twenty uniplanar mowHTOs were performed in standardised (left) solid‐foam proximal tibia models. In the different models, hinge position was rotated stepwise by 10°, between 90° (cutting straight medial to lateral) and 0° (cutting straight anterior to posterior) (n = 10). Additionally, gap heights of 5 and 10 mm were produced and analysed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate a predictive regression formula for the relation between gap height, hinge rotation and the changes of medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), medial and lateral PTS. Results Between cutting angles of 90 and 20°, the MPTA was mainly influenced by the gap height (0.95° MPTA per 1 mm gap height), but not by the cutting angle. Between 20 and 0°, the MPTA was decreased by 3.6° per 10° of rotation, but not by the gap height. Between cutting angles of 90 and 10°, the PTS was increased linearly by 0.97° per 10° of rotation and by 0.61° per 1 mm gap height. Conclusion In mowHTO with lateral hinge positions, the MPTA is mainly influenced by gap height. Changes of PTS can be avoided by a straight lateral hinge position. In posterior hinge locations (0‐20°), changes of MPTA are mainly caused by hinge rotation, but not by gap height. Level of Evidence Level III, Case–control study.