1. Advanced renal cell carcinoma management: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) consensus update.
- Author
-
Soares A, Monteiro FSM, da Trindade KM, Silva AGE, Cardoso APG, Sasse AD, Fay AP, Carneiro APCD, Alencar Junior AM, de Andrade Mota AC, Santucci B, da Motta Girardi D, Herchenhorn D, Araújo DV, Jardim DL, Bastos DA, Rosa DR, Schutz FA, Kater FR, da Silva Marinho F, Maluf FC, de Oliveira FNG, Vidigal F, Morbeck IAP, Rinck Júnior JA, Costa LAGA, Maia MCDF, Zereu M, Freitas MRP, Dias MSF, Tariki MS, Muniz P, Beato PMM, Lages PSM, Velho PI, de Carvalho RS, Mariano RC, de Araújo Cavallero SR, Oliveira TM, Souza VC, Smaletz O, and de Cássio Zequi S
- Subjects
- Humans, Latin America, Consensus, Sunitinib, Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy, Carcinoma, Renal Cell pathology, Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy, Kidney Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil., Methods: A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence., Results: Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease., Conclusion: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF