Search

Contains fulltext : 287484.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Iron content is increased in the substantia nigra of persons with Parkinson's disease and may contribute to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Early research suggests that the iron chelator deferiprone can reduce nigrostriatal iron content in persons with Parkinson's disease, but its effects on disease progression are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial involving participants with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease who had never received levodopa. Participants were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive oral deferiprone at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily or matched placebo for 36 weeks. Dopaminergic therapy was withheld unless deemed necessary for symptom control. The primary outcome was the change in the total score on the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; range, 0 to 260, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment) at 36 weeks. Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes at up to 40 weeks included measures of motor and nonmotor disability. Brain iron content measured with the use of magnetic resonance imaging was also an exploratory outcome. RESULTS: A total of 372 participants were enrolled; 186 were assigned to receive deferiprone and 186 to receive placebo. Progression of symptoms led to the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in 22.0% of the participants in the deferiprone group and 2.7% of those in the placebo group. The mean MDS-UPDRS total score at baseline was 34.3 in the deferiprone group and 33.2 in the placebo group and increased (worsened) by 15.6 points and 6.3 points, respectively (difference, 9.3 points; 95% confidence interval, 6.3 to 12.2; P

Background and Objectives: The Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's Disease (LEAP) study enabled us to conduct post hoc analyses concerning the effects of levodopa in patients with early Parkinson disease. Methods: The LEAP study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, delayed-start trial in which patients with early Parkinson disease were randomized to receive levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 80 weeks (early-start group) or to placebo for 40 weeks followed by levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 40 weeks (delayed-start group). We analyzed the effect of levodopa with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale on bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. At week 80, participants answered 3 questions regarding motor response fluctuations. Results: A total of 222 patients were randomized to the early-start group (mean ± SD age at baseline 64.8 ± 8.7 years; 71% male) and 223 to the delayed-start group (mean ± SD age at baseline 65.5 ± 8.8 years; 69% male). The difference between the early-and delayed-start groups in mean change from baseline to week 4, expressed as Hedges g effect size, was-0.33 for bradykinesia,-0.29 for rigidity, and-0.25 for tremor (for all symptoms indicating a small effect in favor of the early-start group); from baseline to week 22, respectively,-0.49,-0.36, and-0.44 (small to medium effect); and from baseline to week 40, respectively,-0.32,-0.19, and-0.27 (small effect). At 80 weeks, fewer patients in the early-start group (46 of 205 patients, 23%) experienced motor response fluctuations than patients in the delayed-start group (81 of 211, 38%; p < 0.01). Discussion: In patients with early Parkinson disease, levodopa improves bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor to the same order of magnitude. For all 3 symptoms, effects were larger at 22 weeks compared with 4 weeks. At 80 weeks, there were fewer patients with motor response fluctuations in the group that had started levodopa earlier. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that the effect of levodopa on bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor is larger after 22 weeks compared with 4 weeks of treatment. Trial Registration Information: ISRCTN30518857, EudraCT number 2011-000678-72.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for disabling fluctuations in motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, iterative exploration of all individual contact points (four in each STN) by the clinician for optimal clinical effects may take months. Objective: In this proof of concept study we explored whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) has the potential to noninvasively measure the effects of changing the active contact point of STN-DBS on spectral power and functional connectivity in PD patients, with the ultimate aim to aid in the process of selecting the optimal contact point, and perhaps reduce the time to achieve optimal stimulation settings. Methods: The study included 30 PD patients who had undergone bilateral DBS of the STN. MEG was recorded during stimulation of each of the eight contact points separately (four on each side). Each stimulation position was projected on a vector running through the longitudinal axis of the STN, leading to one scalar value indicating a more dorsolateral or ventromedial contact point position. Using linear mixed models, the stimulation positions were correlated with band-specific absolute spectral power and functional connectivity of i) the motor cortex ipsilateral tot the stimulated side, ii) the whole brain. Results: At group level, more dorsolateral stimulation was associated with lower low-beta absolute band power in the ipsilateral motor cortex (p =.019). More ventromedial stimulation was associated with higher whole-brain absolute delta (p =.001) and theta (p =.005) power, as well as higher whole-brain theta band functional connectivity (p =.040). At the level of the individual patient, switching the active contact point caused significant changes in spectral power, but the results were highly variable. Conclusions: We demonstrate for the first time that stimulation of the dorsolateral (motor) STN in PD patients is associated with lower low-beta power values in the motor cortex. Furthermore, our group-level data show that the location of the active contact point correlates with whole-brain brain activity and connectivity. As results in individual patients were quite variable, it remains unclear if MEG is useful in the selection of the optimal DBS contact point.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic tremor is a rare disease characterized by difficulty with standing still. Patients often undergo a long diagnostic search and often feel underrecognized, partly due to unfamiliarity of physicians with the disease. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a 72-year-old male experiencing difficulty in standing still, accompanied by a tingling, trembling and painful sensation in the legs, over the last ten years. Several orthopedic and neurological causes had been suspected until neurological examination revealed a 'helicopter sign' upon auscultation of the leg muscles. Tremor registration showed a 14 Hz tremor in the legs upon standing, confirming the diagnosis of orthostatic tremor. There was moderate improvement with pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSION: Orthostatic tremor should be suspected in patients with instability or atypical symptoms upon standing. A neurological referral including tremor registration is recommended in these cases.

Background Visual hallucinations are common in patients with Parkinson's disease and represent probably the major independent predictor for cognitive deterioration and nursing home placement. Objective To investigate if treatment of minor visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease with rivastigmine delays the progression to psychosis. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial was conducted which aimed to recruit 168 patients with Parkinson's disease reporting minor visual hallucinations 4 weeks before it. Important exclusion criteria were Parkinson's disease dementia, current delirium, and treatment with antipsychotics or drugs that have significant anti‐cholinergic side effects. Subjects were randomized to rivastigmine capsules, 3–6 mg twice a day, or placebo for 24 months. The primary outcome was the time to Parkinson's disease psychosis, which was defined as the need to start with antipsychotics. Results The trial was stopped prematurely because of slow recruitment. Ninety‐one patients were randomized: 46 patients were assigned to rivastigmine and 45 patients to placebo. No effect of rivastigmine could be demonstrated on the transition time to psychosis or dementia during the 24‐month follow‐up period. After 6 months of study treatment, cognition, mood, motor performance, and non‐motor performance did not differ significantly between the rivastigmine‐group and the placebo‐group. Conclusions Because the study was terminated early, it was insufficiently powered to properly evaluate the primary outcome. The limited data of the study favor a wait and see approach instead of early treatment with rivastigmine in PD patients with minor VH., A randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate if treatment of minor visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease with rivastigmine delays the progression to psychosis. The limited data of our study favor a wait and see approach instead of early treatment.

BackgroundNotwithstanding the large improvement in motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS), apathy may increase. Postoperative apathy cannot always be related to a dose reduction of dopaminergic medication and stimulation itself may play a role.ObjectiveWe studied whether apathy in DBS-treated PD patients could be a stimulation effect.MethodsIn 26 PD patients we acquired apathy scores before and >6 months after DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Magnetoencephalography recordings (ON and OFF stimulation) were performed ≥6 months after DBS placement. Change in apathy severity was correlated with (i) improvement in motor function and dose reduction of dopaminergic medication, (ii) stimulation location (merged MRI and CT-scans) and (iii) stimulation-related changes in functional connectivity of brain regions that have an alleged role in apathy.ResultsAverage apathy severity significantly increased after DBS (p < 0.001) and the number of patients considered apathetic increased from two to nine. Change in apathy severity did not correlate with improvement in motor function or dose reduction of dopaminergic medication. For the left hemisphere, increase in apathy was associated with a more dorsolateral stimulation location (p = 0.010). The increase in apathy severity correlated with a decrease in alpha1 functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (p = 0.006), but not with changes of the medial orbitofrontal or the anterior cingulate cortex.ConclusionsThe present observations suggest that apathy after STN-DBS is not necessarily related to dose reductions of dopaminergic medication, but may be an effect of the stimulation itself. This highlights the importance of determining optimal DBS settings based on both motor and non-motor symptoms.