Search

Introduction: There is a lack of comprehensive and uniform data on head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs), and research is challenging due to its rarity and the involvement of multiple medical specialties. To improve current research data collection, we initiated the Head and Neck Paraganglioma Registry (HNPGL Registry). The aim of the HNPGL Registry is to a) collect extensive data on all HNPGL patients through a predefined protocol, b) give insight in the long term outcomes using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), c) create uniformity in the diagnostic and clinical management of these conditions, and thereby d) help provide content for future (randomized) research. Methods and analysis: The HNPGL Registry is designed as a prospective longitudinal observational registry for data collection on HNPGL patients and carriers of (likely) pathogenic variants causative of HNPGLs. All patients, regardless of the received treatment modality, can be included in the registry after informed consent is obtained. All relevant data regarding the initial presentation, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up will be collected prospectively in an electronic case report form. In addition a survey containing the EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Short QUestionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH), Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be sent periodically. The registry protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Conclusion: The HNPGL Registry data will be used to further establish the optimal management for HNPGL patients and lay the foundation for guideline recommendations and the outline of future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: All patients suspected of having head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck area as the standard imaging according to the Dutch guidelines. However, a relatively new imaging modality, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, has shown promising results in the detection of HNPGLs. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the results of this new modality with the standard imaging. We compared both techniques in 25 patients at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had different outcomes between both modalities. In all cases, additional HNPGLs were identified using the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, suggesting the need for further prospective research to validate this finding. If confirmed, this modality could potentially be implemented as the standard of care for HNPGL detection in germline variant carriers. The Dutch guideline for patients suspected of head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) recommends magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck area. Additionally, it suggests considering additional nuclear imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT compared to MRI in patients with suspected HNPGLs and carriers of genetic variations. Methods: In this single-center pilot study, retrospective data were obtained from consecutive patients between 2016 and 2023. Both MRI and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were performed within 12 months. The primary outcome was the location of HNPGLs. Results: A total of 25 consecutive patients were included, and 7 patients (28.0%, p = 0.5) showed differences between the imaging modalities, of whom 5 patients had unexpected localizations with additional uptake by somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on the [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Conclusions: The authors recommend performing baseline imaging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (if available) in variant carriers and using MRI/CT for follow-up according to the regional protocol, thereby shifting the gold standard for baseline imaging from MRI/CT to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs, together PPGLs) are the most hereditary tumors known. PPGLs were considered benign, but the fourth edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification redefined all PPGLs as malignant neoplasms with variable metastatic potential. The metastatic rate differs based on histopathology, genetic background, size, and location of the tumor. The challenge in predicting metastatic disease lies in the absence of a clear genotype-phenotype correlation among the more than 20 identified genetic driver variants. Recent advances in molecular clustering based on underlying genetic alterations have paved the way for improved cluster-specific personalized treatments. However, despite some clusters demonstrating a higher propensity for metastatic disease, cluster-specific therapies have not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice. Comprehensive genomic profiling and transcriptomic analyses of large PPGL cohorts have identified potential new biomarkers that may influence metastatic potential. It appears that no single biomarker alone can reliably predict metastatic risk; instead, a combination of these biomarkers may be necessary to develop an effective prediction model for metastatic disease. This review evaluates current guidelines and recent genomic and transcriptomic findings, with the aim of accurately identifying novel biomarkers that could contribute to a predictive model for mPPGLs, thereby enhancing patient care and outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To examine the treatment decision-making process of patients with dcSSc in the context of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Methods: A qualitative semi-structured interview study was done in patients before or after HSCT, or patients who chose another treatment than HSCT. Thematic analysis was used. Shared decision-making (SDM) was assessed with the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)., Results: Twenty-five patients [16 male/nine female, median age 47 (range 27-68) years] were interviewed: five pre-HSCT, 16 post-HSCT and four following other treatment. Whereas the SDM-Q-9 showed the decision-making process was perceived as shared [median score 81/100 (range 49-100)], we learned from the interviews that the decision was predominantly made by the rheumatologist, and patients were often steered towards a treatment option. Strong guidance of the rheumatologist was appreciated because of a lack of accessible, reliable and SSc-specific information, due to the approach of the decision-making process of the rheumatologist, the large consequence of the decision and the trust in their doctor. Expectations of outcomes and risks also differed between patients. Furthermore, more than half of patients felt they had no choice but to go for HSCT, due to rapid deterioration of health and the perception of HSCT as 'the holy grail'., Conclusion: This is the first study that provides insight into the decision-making process in dcSSc. This process is negatively impacted by a lack of disease-specific education about treatment options. Additionally, we recommend exploring patients' preferences and understanding of the illness to optimally guide decision-making and to provide tailor-made information., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)