1. Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Bex A, Mulders P, Jewett M, Wagstaff J, van Thienen JV, Blank CU, van Velthoven R, Del Pilar Laguna M, Wood L, van Melick HHE, Aarts MJ, Lattouf JB, Powles T, de Jong Md PhD IJ, Rottey S, Tombal B, Marreaud S, Collette S, Collette L, and Haanen J
- Subjects
- Aged, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Canada, Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality, Carcinoma, Renal Cell secondary, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures mortality, Disease Progression, Drug Administration Schedule, Europe, Female, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms mortality, Kidney Neoplasms pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Progression-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects, Sunitinib adverse effects, Time Factors, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Carcinoma, Renal Cell therapy, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures methods, Kidney Neoplasms therapy, Neoadjuvant Therapy adverse effects, Nephrectomy adverse effects, Nephrectomy mortality, Protein Kinase Inhibitors administration & dosage, Sunitinib administration & dosage
- Abstract
Importance: In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown., Objective: To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied., Interventions: Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points., Results: The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF