Search

Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To determine the impact of postpartum counseling on the acceptance of lactational amenorrhoea method (LAM) for family planning.Methods: In a prospective cross-sectional study 1490 postpartum women were included. Women who accepted or refused LAM for family planning were identified by means of a written survey. Twelve socio-demographic and clinical variables were included as predictors in a logistic regression analysis, the acceptance or refusal of LAM was the dependent variable; an Alpha level was set at 0.05.Results: There were 807 (54.2%) women who accepted LAM as a contraceptive method; 683 (45.8%) refused it. Main reasons for accepting LAM were: conviction following counseling (54.4%) and use of LAM initially before switching to another contraceptive modality (18.3%). Main reasons for LAM refusal were: belief that the method was unsafe (62.2%) and fear of some undesirable effect on health (15.8%). In the logistic regression analysis the variables occupation outside the home (P = 0.01) and previous knowledge of LAM (P < 0.001) emerged as predictors of LAM acceptance.Conclusions: Postpartum counseling of LAM had a very positive impact on its acceptance. Although it is recommended that information about LAM be given antenatally, in some settings postpartum counseling could improve its acceptance rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In spite the high rate of contraceptives use, the unplanned pregnancies still frequently occur. It is unknown the amount of women with unplanned pregnancies who accept contraceptive methods at immediate postpartum., Objective: To determine the frequency of women with unplanned pregnancies who accept contraceptives at immediate postpartum and the associated factors with its acceptance., Material and Method: In a cross-sectional study, women at immediate postpartum were recruited. They were asked if their pregnancy was planned or unplanned; if at postpartum accepted some contraceptive method and reasons for acceptance or not. The statistical analysis included arithmetic mean, standard error, percentages, chi2, Student t test; and logistic analysis regression for determining the associated factors with the acceptance of contraceptives. An alpha value was set at 0.05., Results: Of 1,024 women 566 (55.3%) had a planned pregnancy and 457 of them (80.7%) accepted contraceptives. The remaining 458 women (44.7%) had an unplanned pregnancy and 402 (87.8%) accepted contraceptives, p = 0.003. The significant factor associated with the acceptance of contraceptives was the multiparity, p = 0.034., Conclusion: There is more acceptance of contraception in women with unplanned pregnancy. In these women the multiparity is associated with higher acceptance of contraceptive methods. It is recommended to reinforce the contraceptive counselling in this group of women.