Search

Your search keyword '"de Oliveira, Catia M. F."' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "de Oliveira, Catia M. F."
4 results on '"de Oliveira, Catia M. F."'

1. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lueke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Vel Tromp, Myrthe, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Wolska, Julia, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan, Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, FORRT, Pownall, Madeleine [0000-0002-3734-8006], Azevedo, Flávio [0000-0001-9000-8513], Slack, Hannah R [0000-0003-2522-8717], Flack, Zoe [0000-0001-8123-5589], Elsherif, Mahmoud M [0000-0002-0540-3998], Gilligan-Lee, Katie A [0000-0002-5406-2149], de Oliveira, Catia M F [0000-0002-2976-3330], Gjoneska, Biljana [0000-0003-1200-6672], Terry, Jenny [0000-0002-6843-7116], Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan [0000-0003-3412-4311], Baker, Bradley J [0000-0002-1697-4198], Pittelkow, Merle-Marie [0000-0002-7487-7898], Schmidt, Kathleen [0000-0002-9946-5953], Pennington, Charlotte R [0000-0002-5259-642X], Shaw, John J [0000-0003-3190-6772], Hartmann, Helena [0000-0002-1331-6683], Zaneva, Mirela [0000-0003-3569-931X], Walker, Daniel [0000-0002-9369-6953], Weisberg, Yanna [0000-0002-4219-6625], Izydorczak, Kamil [0000-0002-9870-3825], Arriaga, Patrícia [0000-0001-5766-0489], Bochynska, Agata [0000-0001-6211-8600], Micheli, Leticia [0000-0003-0066-8222], Brekelmans, Gwen [0000-0002-8976-6808], Tyler, Samantha L [0000-0001-9602-5015], Iley, Bethan J [0000-0002-5813-3303], Sladekova, Martina [0000-0001-5059-6576], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Open scholarship, Teaching, Pedagogy, Open Research, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, Higher Education, MetaArXiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, Open Scholarship, Reproducibility, MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Open Science, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Higher education, Open research, Open science, SDG 4 - Quality Education
Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness, and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (1) students’ scientific literacies (i.e., students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science, and the development of transferable skills); (2) student engagement (i.e., motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration, and engagement in open research), and (3) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e., trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Examples of best practice in embedding open and reproducible scholarship from Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students’ scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

4. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.

Author

Pownall M, Azevedo F, König LM, Slack HR, Evans TR, Flack Z, Grinschgl S, Elsherif MM, Gilligan-Lee KA, de Oliveira CMF, Gjoneska B, Kalandadze T, Button K, Ashcroft-Jones S, Terry J, Albayrak-Aydemir N, Děchtěrenko F, Alzahawi S, Baker BJ, Pittelkow MM, Riedl L, Schmidt K, Pennington CR, Shaw JJ, Lüke T, Makel MC, Hartmann H, Zaneva M, Walker D, Verheyen S, Cox D, Mattschey J, Gallagher-Mitchell T, Branney P, Weisberg Y, Izydorczak K, Al-Hoorie AH, Creaven AM, Stewart SLK, Krautter K, Matvienko-Sikar K, Westwood SJ, Arriaga P, Liu M, Baum MA, Wingen T, Ross RM, O'Mahony A, Bochynska A, Jamieson M, Tromp MV, Yeung SK, Vasilev MR, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A, Micheli L, Konkol M, Moreau D, Bartlett JE, Clark K, Brekelmans G, Gkinopoulos T, Tyler SL, Röer JP, Ilchovska ZG, Madan CR, Robertson O, Iley BJ, Guay S, Sladekova M, and Sadhwani S

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship., Competing Interests: We declare we have no competing interests., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results