Search

Digital forensic practitioners will encounter digital traces during their examinations which they must take steps to understand. This may involve trying to attribute an ‘activity’ to a trace (what created it) or determine where it came from (its ‘source’) – Trace-to-Activity/Source interpretation. Alternatively, they may need to determine if an activity has taken place on a system by identifying traces denoting it – Activity-to-Trace interpretation. In both instances, practitioners may need to conduct tests and/or identify research which will help them understand a trace, and compare any results of their testing/research to the traces in their casework. This work describes both the Trace-to-Activity/Source and Activity-to-Trace interpretive journeys, as well as the steps contained in both. In addition, six ‘trace comparison criteria’ are proposed and discussed to help those carrying out a trace comparison, notably: ‘trace location’, ‘trace structure’, ‘trace examination method’, ‘trace metadata’, ‘trace content’, and ‘trace context’. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate likelihood ratio models motivated by digital forensics problems involving time‐stamped user‐generated event data from a device or account. Of specific interest are scenarios where the data may have been generated by a single individual (the device/account owner) or by two different individuals (the device/account owner and someone else), such as instances in which an account was hacked or a device was stolen before being associated with a crime. Existing likelihood ratio methods in this context require that a precise time is specified at which the device or account is purported to have changed hands (the changepoint)—this is the known changepoint likelihood ratio model. In this paper, we develop a likelihood ratio model that instead accommodates uncertainty in the changepoint using Bayesian techniques, that is, an unknown changepoint likelihood ratio model. We show that the likelihood ratio in this case can be calculated in closed form as an expression that is straightforward to compute. In experiments with simulated changepoints using real‐world data sets, the results demonstrate that the unknown changepoint model attains comparable performance to the known changepoint model that uses a perfectly specified changepoint, and considerably outperforms the known changepoint model that uses a misspecified changepoint, illustrating the benefit of capturing uncertainty in the changepoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ground truth data (GTD) is used by those in the field of digital forensics (DF) for a variety of purposes including to evaluate the functionality of undocumented, new, or emerging technology and services and the digital traces left behind following their usage. Most accepted and reliable trace interpretations must be derived from an examination of relevant GTD, yet despite the importance of it to the DF community, there is little formal guidance available for supporting those who create it, to do so in a way that ensures any data is of good quality, reliable, and therefore usable. In an attempt to address this issue, this work proposes a minimum standard of documentation that must accompany the production of any GTD, particularly when it is intended for use in the process of discovering new knowledge, proposing original interpretations of a digital trace, or determining the functionality of any technology or service. A template structure is discussed and provided in Appendix S1 which sets out a minimum standard for metadata describing any GTD's production process and content. It is suggested that such an approach can support the maintenance of trust in any GTD and improve the shareability of it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper aims to identify impediments, discuss impediments and make recommendations for the impediments during the execution of a search and seizure warrant for digital evidence in South African criminal cases. Design/methodology/approach: The discussion of this article, the second article of two, focuses on a literature review of international and local impediments identified in case law and published research literature and how it is approached in various jurisdictions. Findings: This study found that impediments identified and addressed internationally during the execution of a search and seizure warrant for digital evidence are relevant to South African criminal cases and still need to be addressed during the execution of a search and seizure warrant for digital evidence in South African criminal cases. Research limitations/implications: Although searches and seizures for digital evidence are relevant to civil, regulatory and criminal investigations, this study focuses on the search and seizure for digital evidence in criminal matters with an emphasis on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 and the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020. Originality/value: The originality of this paper lies in the procedures followed during the physical search and seizure of digital information during the execution of search and seizure warrants for digital information in South Africa. If the South African Police Service follows the recommended procedures, it will contribute to the success of the South African Police Service, which would result in the improved quality of investigations and successful prosecution of crime in South Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing is the property of Research & Development of Human Recourses Center (REMAH) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: The Digital Measures Development: Core Measures of Sleep project, led by the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), emphasizes the importance of sleep as a cornerstone of health and the need for standardized measurements of sleep and its disturbances outside the laboratory. This initiative recognizes the complex relationship between sleep and overall health, addressing it as both a symptom of underlying conditions and a consequence of therapeutic interventions. It aims to fill a crucial gap in healthcare by promoting the development of accessible, nonintrusive, and cost-effective digital tools for sleep assessment, focusing on factors important to patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Methods: A central feature of this project was an expert workshop conducted on April 19th, 2023. The workshop convened stakeholders from diverse backgrounds, including regulatory, payer, industry, academic, and patient groups, to deliberate on the project’s direction. This gathering focused on discussing the challenges and necessities of measuring sleep across various therapeutic areas, aiming to identify broad areas for initial focus while considering the feasibility of generalizing these measures where applicable. The methodological emphasis was on leveraging expert consensus to guide the project’s approach to digital sleep measurement. Results: The workshop resulted in the identification of seven key themes that will direct the DiMe Core Digital Measures of Sleep project and the broader field of sleep research moving forward. These themes underscore the project’s innovative approach to sleep health, highlighting the complexity of omni-therapeutic sleep measurement and identifying potential areas for targeted research and development. The discussions and outcomes of the workshop serve as a roadmap for enhancing digital sleep measurement tools, ensuring they are relevant, accurate, and capable of addressing the nuanced needs of diverse patient populations. Conclusion: The Digital Medicine Society’s Core Measures of Sleep project represents a pivotal effort to advance sleep health through digital innovation. By focusing on the development of standardized, patient-centric, and clinically relevant digital sleep assessment tools, the project addresses a significant need in healthcare. The expert workshop’s outcomes underscore the importance of collaborative, multi-stakeholder engagement in identifying and overcoming the challenges of sleep measurement. This initiative sets a new precedent for the integration of digital tools into sleep health research and practice, promising to improve outcomes for patients worldwide by enhancing our understanding and measurement of sleep.

Cybercrime is growing rapidly, and it is increasingly important to use advanced tools to combat it and support investigations. One of the battlefronts is the forensic investigation of mobile devices to analyze their misuse and recover information. Mobile devices present numerous challenges, including a rapidly changing environment, increasing diversity, and integration with the cloud/IoT. Therefore, it is essential to have a secure and reliable toolbox that allows an investigator to thwart, discover, and solve all problems related to mobile forensics while deciphering investigations, whether criminal, civil, corporate, or other. In this work, we propose an original and innovative instantiation of a structure in a forensic toolbox for mobile devices, corresponding to a set of different applications, methods, and best practice information aimed at improving and perfecting the investigative process of a digital investigator. To ensure scientific support for the construction of the toolbox, the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology was applied, which seeks to create new and unique artifacts, drawing on the strength and knowledge of science and context. The toolbox will help the forensic investigator overcome some of the challenges related to mobile devices, namely the lack of guidance, documentation, knowledge, and the ability to keep up with the fast-paced environment that characterizes the mobile industry and market. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-03-011 Full Text: PDF

Objectives The purpose of the study is to comprehensively examine the interpretation of cybersex in the context of marital guilt, while assessing the implications and challenges of bringing such evidence to court. The article aims to navigate the interpretation and legal recognition of cybersex as grounds for divorce. Material and methods The study used methods used in legal science: 1) the dogmatic method, referring to the establishment of current legal regulations governing the rules of electronic evidence, including cybersex evidence, as well as the way they are used in divorce processes and their impact on the permanent and complete breakdown of marital relations; it has a dominant character in the study due to the fact that the authors focus on the analysis of current legal regulations, as well as their practical use and application in other countries (e.g., the USA and Canada). 2) The analytical method was applied with reference to the current state of knowledge in the subject area in the body of legal science. 3) The comparative legal method is of complementary importance and relates to the analysis of legal and organizational solutions to the use of so-called illegal evidence, as well as the difficulties of conducting evidence and regulations in other countries. 4) The historical method is related to the evolution of the development of the rules of evidence in civil litigation in view of the development and spread of the use of modern technological solutions in justice. Results The potential use of cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings in Civil Procedure, while complex, provides an opportunity for legal growth. Conclusions Incorporating cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings brings a set of challenges, especially related to the violation of privacy rights, data protection, and the potential for cybercrime.

Despite concerns having been voiced internationally about the validity and reliability of mobile phone evidence, there remain large gaps in our understanding of how police acquire and process mobile phone data, and the risks associated with this work. This paper fills some of these gaps by drawing upon qualitative data gathered during an ethnographic study of the role of forensic sciences and technologies in British homicide investigations. Specifically, we draw upon case papers, interviews, and observations to illuminate, from the perspective of police and prosecution actors, some of the opportunities, tensions, and risks encountered in accessing and processing mobile phone data during these inquiries. Our findings reveal several risks associated with current practice alongside broader complexities related to legislation, privatisation, and accreditation. We consider how these intertwined risks and challenges may undermine the reliability of mobile phone evidence and jeopardise criminal justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing use of digital technologies in judicial and arbitration proceedings increases the usage of digital evidence by the parties, which brings the necessity of creating patterns for adjudicators to admit and assess this new type of evidence. This paper generally addresses digital evidence focusing on the second moment in international arbitration proceedings. It also narrows the topic to hacked and leaked evidence and its admissibility in international arbitration. The literature review showed a significant amount of research devoted to the evidence in arbitration. Some considered electronic evidence within one jurisdiction; others focused on certain forms of digital evidence such as electronic signatures. Papers on digital evidence in international arbitration approach arbitration rules for digital evidence but skip admissibility issues. No systemic and complex works research digital evidence in arbitration, explicitly focusing on the admissibility of hacked and leaked digital evidence from a comparative perspective. Also, no research deals with enforcing international arbitration awards relying on illegally obtained digital evidence. In these cases, there could be a possible violation of domestic public policy under the New York Convention terms (art. V, 2, b). That is why the paper aims to offer the concept of digital evidence in international arbitration, including hacked and leaked evidence, criteria of its admissibility and relevance, and design the arbitration guidelines for assessing hacked and leaked evidence. Comparative legal analysis of the international arbitration rules and national procedure law allowed us to compare the regulatory approaches to the definition of digital evidence and its admissibility worldwide. The method of legal modeling allowed designing model guidelines for arbitral tribunals to evaluate the admissibility and relevance of digital evidence, including hacked and leaked evidence. Moreover, the case study method allowed us to analyze jurisprudence and define criteria for admission of hacked and leaked evidence. We conclude that the admissibility of hacked and leaked evidence depends solely on the arbitrator's broad discretion to assess the evidence. Nevertheless, thorough evidence analysis and a well-reasoned award are always mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors analyze the potential use of cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings, with a focus on determining marital fault from a comparative legal perspective. The purpose of the study is to comprehensively examine the interpretation of cybersex in the context of marital guilt, while assessing the implications and challenges of bringing such evidence to court in the Polish legal framework. The authors examine the implications of these social changes in the Polish legal framework, focusing on the potential use of cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings to establish marital fault. The analysis considers different legal jurisdictions, their interpretation of cybersex in the context of marital infidelity, and the procedural challenges of presenting such evidence in court. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Environmental & Social Management Journal / Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental is the property of Environmental & Social Management Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

As cybercrimes grow more sophisticated, network and cloud forensics have become vital investigative tools. However, complex legal, ethical, and practical challenges around extraterritorial evidence, privacy rights, volatile data, and specialized skills constrain these processes. This study critically reviews academic literature and industry reports to examine these multifaceted considerations holistically. It aims to aggregate the latest insights around regulations, technical protocols, certification regimes, and international cooperation frameworks shaping network and cloud forensics. The study follows qualitative research methodology, a doctrinal approach used for the analysis of regulation, and grounded theory used for the analysis of related literature. The results reveal gaps around the liability limitations of internet service and cloud providers, ethical bounds for ancillary data collection, and anti-forensic obfuscation techniques. Proposed solutions include accountability in technology design through transparency and oversight. Simplify procedures for cross-border legal assistance requests. Develop lightweight encryption methods that still enable lawful access as well as promote collaboration between industry and academia to advance cybersecurity tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the second protocol is to strengthen cooperation in cybercrime and the collection of electronic evidence of crimes for the purpose of specific criminal investigations or proceedings. The article also presents and analyzes the most important procedural aspects related to the second additional protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on cybercrime regarding enhanced cooperation and the disclosure of electronic evidence. The analysis of the second additional protocol takes into account the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime.

Abstract Background Proper investigation of digital evidence is of prime significance in cyber investigations. From the collection of evidence, its preservation, and its analysis, it is important to maintain its integrity in the legal system due to the involvement of different stakeholders like law enforcement agencies, digital analysts, and the judiciary. This review paper focuses on how blockchain technology can be used to collect evidence efficiently. Main text In the present scenario, the manual logs of the chain of custody are used to ensure that the evidence remains confidential and transparent. It is accompanied by filling out the application forms and maintaining logs within the organization handling the evidence. Hence, it is important to ensure the validity, integrity, and verifiability of evidence as it moves through different hierarchical levels. There are certain issues associated with the current chain of custody, such as evidence loss, theft, tampering, and, even worse, evidence manipulation inside the system. To avoid this situation and to make the process coherent, this review paper aims to highlight the potential use of blockchain technology to preserve chain of custody. Conclusion Although this scientific technology is mainly used to run cryptocurrencies, with careful consideration and application, this could play a key role in supporting and managing the chain of custody. It is a distributed database that keeps track of blocks. These blocks are collection of entries that keep growing continually and are secured from editing and manipulation by retaining the hash of the previous block in the chain. This is a decentralized technology that is not easily compromised in terms of security and therefore has the potential to solve our problem area. A future research agenda needs to be established, which lays the solid foundation for further studies on this evident emerging area.

The evolution of digital technology has revolutionized the landscape of criminal investigations and legal proceedings. This paper delves into the nuanced realm of evidence, with a particular focus on digital evidence, which has become increasingly prevalent in today's digital age. The proliferation of digital information presents both opportunities and challenges for the field of criminal procedure. Recognizing the growing importance of electronic evidence in criminal investigations, the Commission has taken proactive measures to streamline the process of obtaining such evidence. New rules have been introduced to facilitate the acquisition of electronic evidence by judicial authorities. Among these rules are provisions for the creation of a European Evidence Production Order and a European Preservation Order specifically tailored for electronic evidence in criminal cases. Furthermore, providers of electronic services operating within the European Union are now required to appoint a legal representative, further enhancing the accessibility of electronic evidence for legal proceedings. Despite these advancements, the utilization of digital evidence raises complex legal questions and challenges. This paper critically examines the various implications associated with the use of digital evidence, shedding light on issues such as authenticity, admissibility, and the preservation of digital evidence. By analyzing these aspects in depth, the paper aims to provide insights into the multifaceted nature of digital evidence and its implications for criminal procedure. In addition to addressing legal complexities, the paper also seeks to establish a foundational understanding of digital evidence by providing basic definitions and classifications. By elucidating the diverse sources and forms of digital evidence, ranging from emails and transaction records to video recordings and metadata, the paper lays the groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of this evolving field. In conclusion, this paper serves as a comprehensive exploration of the role of digital evidence in contemporary criminal investigations and legal proceedings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of forensic analysis of cloud computing traffic is to identify any suspicious or malicious behavior in network activities within cloud computing settings. This includes examining network connections, data transfer patterns, and data payloads. To effectively analyze cloud computing traffic associated with IoT devices, it is imperative to understand cloud infrastructure and network protocols. The prevalence of IoT devices in cloud environments necessitates efficient forensic analysis techniques to address security incidents. Considering the distinctive attributes of IoT devices and the decentralized nature of cloud environments, this paper investigates the challenges and considerations related to forensic analysis in cloud computing systems incorporating IoT devices. The framework we present includes comprehensive guidelines about data collection, preservation, analysis, and forensic analysis in IoT-based cloud computing systems. As well as providing practical case studies, we demonstrate how our framework works in real-world scenarios involving IoT-based cloud computing. Providing tangible solutions to the forensic challenges specific to IoT-based cloud computing systems, the findings of this research contribute significantly to a better understanding of these challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proper investigation of digital evidence is of prime significance in cyber investigations. From the collection of evidence, its preservation, and its analysis, it is important to maintain its integrity in the legal system due to the involvement of different stakeholders like law enforcement agencies, digital analysts, and the judiciary. This review paper focuses on how blockchain technology can be used to collect evidence efficiently. Main text: In the present scenario, the manual logs of the chain of custody are used to ensure that the evidence remains confidential and transparent. It is accompanied by filling out the application forms and maintaining logs within the organization handling the evidence. Hence, it is important to ensure the validity, integrity, and verifiability of evidence as it moves through different hierarchical levels. There are certain issues associated with the current chain of custody, such as evidence loss, theft, tampering, and, even worse, evidence manipulation inside the system. To avoid this situation and to make the process coherent, this review paper aims to highlight the potential use of blockchain technology to preserve chain of custody. Conclusion: Although this scientific technology is mainly used to run cryptocurrencies, with careful consideration and application, this could play a key role in supporting and managing the chain of custody. It is a distributed database that keeps track of blocks. These blocks are collection of entries that keep growing continually and are secured from editing and manipulation by retaining the hash of the previous block in the chain. This is a decentralized technology that is not easily compromised in terms of security and therefore has the potential to solve our problem area. A future research agenda needs to be established, which lays the solid foundation for further studies on this evident emerging area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the complexity of digital forensic work continues to grow, and the demands and pressures placed on practitioners to complete their investigatory commitments remain, methods for conducting effective and efficient work are of paramount importance. To combat examination challenges any investigating team requires two fundamental and linked components; those conducting DF examinations should develop (1) a digital evidence strategy (DES) that outlines an effective investigative approach, and, (2) deploy it using appropriate tools and techniques. While these should be considered as a pair, arguably as tools have become more comprehensive and more akin to "suites," there is a real risk that tools themselves are being considered an "examination strategy," bypassing the need for investigative forethought. Given this concern, through the vehicle of an example deconstructed hypothetical forensic examination process, this work discusses the relationship between DESs and digital forensic tools, and the importance of both. This article is categorized under:Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Law enforcement co‐ordination agencies have recently issued position/guidance documents relating to the potential for VR environments (the "Metaverse") to become new environment for criminal activity, and calling for additional work to enhance investigative capability. By reviewing the historic development of VR and comparing it with the appearance of the WWW, the authors propose that the situation is not as dire as the issued documents may suggest, but represents an evolutionary rather than revolutionary step in online experiences. They conclude, therefore, that while ability to examine VR presentation/interaction devices may be useful, continued development of ability to examine online systems remains essential. This article is categorized under:Digital and Multimedia Science > Multimedia ForensicsDigital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime InvestigationDigital and Multimedia Science > Artificial Intelligence [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Digital evidence is content that must be protected against access and use by parties who should not have the authority to do so. Some protection parameters for access to digital evidence must be implemented to ensure its integrity and authenticity. Access to digital evidence is not enough to be facilitated only with authorization and authentication mechanisms but must also be facilitated with other aspects of access by users according to their level of authority. One approach is to use the concept of access control. The study of access control to digital evidence is essential. However, studies on this matter are still limited. Among the many access control models, the application of access control based on attribute variations is a concept that can be applied to the context of access to digital evidence. This paper discusses policy design and modeling using attribute-based access control (ABAC) with four attributes: subject, resource, action, and environment. Then, it implements and tests various requests to the system based on attribute variations and possible algorithms. This study supports the security of digital evidence storage systems through access control to the resources it manages using the Policy Statement, Policy Modeling, Policy Implementation, and Policy Validation approaches. The application of the access control design shows that the ABAC concept has been successfully applied as an access control solution for digital evidence stored in digital evidence storage systems. The built policy design was successfully validated using ACPT Tools, concluding that there was no inconsistency or incompleteness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the rapid pace of informatization of society, the number of criminal offences involving the use of computers, their software, as well as telecommunications systems is continuously growing. Such illegal actions are characterized by leaving traces, including electronic imagery. They can be evidence of the commission of criminal offences, which explains the development and improvement of methods for their detection, collection, and investigation by law enforcement agencies. However, today such methods of detecting, collecting, and investigating electronic imagery of evidence are separately contained in several scientific papers of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, which allowed comprehensively covering them in this study. The purpose of this study was to review the theory and practice of the activities of authorized entities for the detection, collection, and investigation of electronic imagery of evidence. The study uses a set of various methods, namely scientific cognition of real phenomena and their connections with the practical activities of authorized bodies for the detection, collection, and investigation of electronic imagery (dialectical method), as well as special and general scientific methods of legal science. The study showed as follows: usually, investigators and operational officers detect electronic imagery independently, or as part of an investigative task force during the investigation of criminal offences, or before their commission; the collection of electronic imagery occurs during procedural actions (usually law enforcement intelligence actions) both from technical devices with which a criminal offence was committed, and from those that were attacked. When extracting electronic imagery, it is advisable to involve a suitable specialist (if possible, a cyberpolice officer); an authorized investigator, specialist, and expert are authorized to examine electronic imagery. Expert research of electronic imagery belongs only to experts and is carried out using the following examinations: computer equipment and software products, telecommunications systems and tools, as well as technical and forensic examination of documents. The conducted review will help authorized practitioners restore the memory of knowledge about information about the tools for detecting, collecting, and investigating electronic imagery, which will ensure the effective implementation of the tasks of criminal proceedings

The article summarises the scientific developments regarding the concept and essence of electronic evidence and provides the author’s own definition to the concept of “electronic (digital) evidence” in criminal proceedings; examines the regulatory framework for the use of electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings; analyses the investigative and judicial practice and the practice of the Supreme Court regarding the admissibility of such evidence in criminal proceedings. It has been admitted that today the problem of regulating electronic (digital) evidence is relevant. The analysis of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine makes it possible to understand that electronic (digital) evidence has almost no legal regulation, which negatively affects the quality and effectiveness of criminal proceedings. As a result, a number of legislative contradictions arise. Unlike other procedural laws (commercial, civil and administrative), criminal procedural legislation does not contain any provisions on electronic (digital) evidence. At the same time, there are positive trends at the legislative level to recognise the need to regulate electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings. It has been determined that today there is no unified approach among scholars to understanding the concept, features and place of electronic evidence in the system of sources of evidence in criminal proceedings. It is proposed to use the term “electronic (digital) evidence” at the legislative level. This is substantiated by the fact that “electronic” indicates the type of device with which the evidence was created and stored, and “digital” refers to the type of recording the formation on the relevant device. The analysis of investigative and judicial practice has highlighted the ambiguity in the understanding of law enforcement officers regarding the collection of electronic evidence. This issue was the subject for consideration by the judges of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court (in particular, the procedure for assessing electronic evidence and its admissibility was explained in the decision of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court dated 29 March 2021 in case No. 554/5090/16-к). Taking into account international experience in collecting electronic (digital) evidence allows the use of the Berkeley Protocol in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, as it is actively used by the international community and is relevant in the context of russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine.

Copyright of Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law is the property of Uzhhorod National University, State Higher Educational Establishment and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The current study explored how a computer-generated animation (CGA) illustrating a defendant's version of events affected jurors' judgments in a mock second-degree murder trial. We hypothesized that mock jurors who viewed a CGA illustrating the defendant's testimony would be more likely to acquit compared to those who viewed static visual images or did not view a visual aid, and that this effect would occur regardless of whether the narrative depicted in the CGA was corroborated by pertinent testimonial evidence. In this 2 (testimony congruence: incongruent vs. congruent) x 3 (testimony modality: no-aid vs. static visual aid vs. computer-generated animation) between-subjects design, undergraduate students (N = 238) read a transcript from a fictitious trial and heard the defendant's testimony in one of three modalities. Across congruence conditions, participants were significantly more likely to acquit the defendant when his testimony was accompanied by a CGA (OR = 5.08), compared to a static visual aid or with no-aid. Our results suggest that CGAs may have a disproportionate impact on jurors' judgments compared to traditional forms of demonstrative evidence. Whether this impact is facilitative or prejudicial, however, depends on whether the content of the animation is congruent or incongruent with other case evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Law & Emerging Technologies (JOLETS) is the property of Journal of Law & Emerging Technologies (JOLETS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cuestiones Políticas is the property of Revista Cuestiones Politicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of IDP: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Politica is the property of Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Context. A feature of the modern digital world is that crime is often committed thanks to the latest computer technologies, and the work of law enforcement agencies faces a number of complex challenges in the digital environment. The development of information technology and Internet communications creates new opportunities for criminals who use digital traces and evidence to commit crimes, which complicates the process of identifying and tracking them. Objective. Development of an applied ontology for a system for analyzing a digital criminal offense, which will effectively analyze, process and interpret a large amount of digital data. It will help to cope with the complex task of processing digital data, and will also help automate the process of discovering new knowledge. Methods. To build an ontological model as a means of reflecting knowledge about digital crime, information was collected on existing international and domestic classifications. The needs and requirements that must be satisfied by the developed ontology were also analyzed. The creation of an ontological model that reflects the basic concepts, relationships in the field of digital criminal offense was carried out in accordance with a recognized ontological analysis of a specialized subject area. Results. An applied ontology contains the definition of entities, properties, classes, subclasses, etc., as well as the creation of semantic relationships between them. At the center of the semantics is the Digital Crime class, the problem area of which is complemented by the interrelated classes Intruder, Digital evidence, Types of Crime, and Criminal liability. Such characteristics as motive, type of crime, method of commission, classification signs of digital traces and types of crime, as well as other individual information were assigned to the attributes of the corresponding classes. An ontological model was implemented in OWL using the Protégé software tool. A feature of the implementation of the applied ontology was the creation of SWRL rules for automatically filling in additional links between a class instance. Manual and automatic verification of the ontology showed the integrity, consistency, a high degree of correctness and adequacy of the model. The bugs found were usually related to technical aspects and semantic inconsistencies, which were corrected during further development iterations. Conclusions. The research confirmed the effectiveness of the developed applied ontology for the analysis of digital criminality, providing more accurate and faster results compared to traditional approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article delves into the intricate domain of electronic evidence (e-evidence) within the Ukrainian criminal justice system. The primary objective is to comprehensively dissect the multifaceted legal intricacies surrounding e-evidence, including its position and significance in Ukraine’s ongoing quest for European integration and its response to the persistent armed conflict. The article extensively examines the intricate complexities of e-evidence, exploring its pivotal role within the broader framework of procedural sources of evidence. It also scrutinises its interaction with traditional forms of evidence, shedding light on the evolving landscape of legal practices in a digital age. The article emphasises the urgent imperative for substantial enhancements in Ukraine’s legal framework governing e-evidence. The existing framework falls short of contemporary standards, posing substantial impediments to effective law enforcement and judicial prosecution in this era of rapid technological advancements. To ensure accountability for past transgressions and to sustain the principles of the rule of law during the post-war era, Ukraine must harmonise its legal system with modern approaches to handling e-evidence. In summary, this article offers a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the intricacies surrounding electronic evidence in the Ukrainian criminal justice system. It addresses critical legal dimensions, acknowledging their importance as Ukraine navigates a path towards integration with European legal standards and grapples with the ramifications of a prolonged armed conflict. The exploration presented here is a significant step towards a more profound understanding of the role and challenges of electronic evidence in the contemporary legal landscape.

Background: Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) consortium IDEA-FAST is developing novel digital measures of fatigue, sleep quality, and impact of sleep disturbances for neurodegenerative diseases and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. In 2022, the consortium met with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to receive advice on its plans for regulatory qualification of the measures. This viewpoint reviews the IDEA-FAST perspective on developing digital measures for multiple diseases and the advice provided by the EMA. Summary: The EMA considered a cross-disease measure an interesting and arguably feasible concept. Developers should account for the need for a strong rationale that the clinical features to be measured are similar across diseases. In addition, they may expect increased complexity of study design, challenges when managing differences within and between disease populations, and the need for validation in both heterogeneous and homogeneous populations. Key Messages: EMA highlighted the challenges teams may encounter when developing a cross-disease measure, though benefits potentially include reduced resources for the technology developer and health authority, faster access to innovation across different therapeutic fields, and feasibility of cross-disease comparisons. The insights included here can be used by project teams to guide them in the development of cross-disease digital measures intended for regulatory qualification.

In England and Wales, Management of Sexual or Violent Offenders (MOSOVO) teams are often tasked with managing offenders that are subject to Sexual Harm Prevention Orders SHPOs. These orders are put in place to protect the public and contain a series of prohibitions that allow for an offender’s conduct to be regulated and reviewed. SHPOs can be used to govern how offenders use their digital devices, particularly with regard to accessing the internet and the sending of electronic communications. To ensure SHPO compliance, officers frequently conduct reviews of any offender’s devices, sometimes manually by traversing a device’s menus and screens. These device manual reviews are not easy to conduct, often done under time pressures and in the knowledge that any missed evidence of misconduct may facilitate an offender to continue any wrongdoing and potentially increase the risk of harm to members of the public. Further, it is not always technical specialists undertaking this role. This work outlines a manual review strategy for devices running the operating system iOS (Apple products) to support officers in this role. Guided by commonly included SHPO prohibitions, relevant digital traces for evaluating SHPO compliance are highlighted, and limitations surrounding determining user behaviour are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Digital investigations are largely concerned with reconstructing past events based on traces in digital systems. Given their importance, many concepts have been established to describe their quality—most of them concerned with procedural aspects, i.e., authenticity and integrity, for example. Besides that, there exist principal concepts that have been overlooked in the past: Two of those criteria are relevance and expressiveness of digital evidence. Unlike others, those are directly concerned with reaching the investigative goal. Therefore, we approach these two overlooked concepts of digital evidence by giving formal definitions. To illustrate the usefulness, we present two applications: First, we demonstrate that the notions of expressiveness and completeness can be used to guide investigations by presenting the Facet-oriented Criminalistic Cycle as a thinking model, which extends the well-established criminalistic cycle. Second, we put the concepts into practice by calculating the expressiveness of facets from a state machine representation of a digital system utilizing temporal logic and a model checker. Furthermore, we sketch out the implications of this improved way of defining relevance and expressiveness. Accordingly, this article aims to improve the understanding of these critical aspects of the overall investigative process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Pure Sciences is the property of Marmara University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)