Search

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Polissema is the property of Polissema and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Polissema is the property of Polissema and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Résumé: Les marchés du travail de l'Afrique subsaharienne se caractérisent par une répartition asymétrique des hommes et des femmes entre secteurs formel et informel, imputable à une segmentation juridique fondée sur la race et le genre héritée des régimes coloniaux qui régissaient, notamment, le travail. Comprendre la segmentation des marchés du travail dans les contextes postcoloniaux, ou tenter de la surmonter, suppose de rechercher dans les institutions coloniales les origines de la marchandisation du travail. Celle‐ci découle d'une norme coloniale du travail basée sur l'exploitation, centrée sur les travailleurs africains masculins au service d'employeurs européens et excluant ou marginalisant les femmes et le travail domestique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia is the property of Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper proposes a systematic comparison of language inclusiveness standards established in France and Quebec by governmental agents. This comparison enables to put into perspective the widely shared idea that Quebec is far more advanced than France on this issue. On the contrary, the comparison reveals great similarities in state standards concerning the use of inclusive language. Differences do exist, but not so much in the substance of the norms as in the interactions between the institutions that enact them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comparison is a very common tool for international lawyers. In fact, international law is built around, and draws upon, constructions necessitating an exercise of comparison. In recent years, however, calls have been made to turn the familiar tool of comparison into a central way to engage with international law. This is the idea of those spearheading the rise of a new field called comparative international law. This article critically examines the promotion of comparison as a central mode of engagement with international law and scrutinizes some of the main features of the comparativist project. It particularly shows that the comparativist project, far from laying bare the plurality of international legal thought and practice, enables a thought-colonizing enterprise. The article ends with some reflective observations on the possibility of limiting colonizing thinking in international legal studies. In doing so, it argues that it must remain possible for international lawyers to engage with alterity in a way that does not unilaterally manufacture the "other," silence it, and speak on its behalf. This approach is called counter-comparability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Academia & Derecho is the property of Universidad Libre - Seccional Cucuta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Le présent article soutient l’importance de l’enseignement du Droit dans la formation de futurs traducteurs juridiques (compétence extralinguistique). En même temps, il cherche à démontrer la nécessité d’inclure, de manière explicite dans les programmes d’études des formations universitaires de traduction de notre pays la discipline « Droit comparé » en tant qu’outil de grande valeur pour la tâche traductrice. Nous présentons un nouveau projet de recherche mené à la Faculté des Humanités et des Sciences de l’Éducation (UNLP) visant l’inauguration d’un axe de recherche encore non exploré dans notre pays : l’utilité des études de Droit comparé comme instrument pour le développement professionnel et l’enseignement de la traduction juridique adaptée au contexte local.

Cet article trace d’abord un bilan du cadre institutionnel et constitutionnel actuel du droit à l’éducation dans quatre des États membres de la CPLP (Angola, Cap-Vert, Guinée équatoriale et Mozambique). Cette étape est suivie par une étude sur l’état des travaux scientifiques menés au Portugal sur le droit à l’éducation dans le monde lusophone. L’accent est mis sur les recherches sur le contexte, le droit positif, et les programmes d’aide au développement promus par l’ONU et l’UNESCO au sein des pays intéressés. Plus que d’avancer des conclusions ou d’encourager le développement de nouvelles recherches, cette étude fournit de nouvelles données, indiquant l’importance de la problématique du droit à l’éducation au sein de la CPLP dans le futur.

Le texte traduit reflète parfois la tradition d’écriture du droit visé, mais l’équivalence du message juridique, elle, doit être réalisée. La traduction du droit vers une culture juridique différente ne peut se faire sans analyse comparée des droits, dont la connaissance est requise pour réaliser l’équivalence juridique. La forme linguistique du texte cible doit néanmoins correspondre à sa culture. La traduction juridique est alors le point de rencontre entre langues, cultures et droits. Pour advenir, cette rencontre doit reposer sur une connaissance ad hoc des droits en présence. Entre alors en jeu le droit comparé, « compagnon de route » du traducteur, qu’il prépare à l’échange. Pour le réaliser, « il suffit de deux réceptions qui s’entrecroisent» (Carbonnier). Cette opération connaît le succès lorsque concepts et notions se recoupent et que la lettre du droit (le fond) et son expression (la forme) se fondent, illustrant «l’esprit des lois». L’analyse comparative est le moyen d’atteindre ce résultat. Elle est conduite ici sous l’éclairage de la jurilinguistique par l’analyse de termes et notions présentant diverses difficultés de traduction, démontrant la nécessité du droit comparé (I). Une comparaison de traductions du Code Napoléon et d'autres codes civils complètera la quête de l’esprit des lois par la manière dont est rendue la lettre ou l’esprit du texte à traduire (II). Les leçons à tirer s’adressent aux langagiers. Ils trouveront dans la méthode d’analyse comparative de la jurilinguistique matière à perfectionner leurs travaux et, dans les traductions des codes civils, une base de réflexion sur le rôle et la fonction de la traduction.

Abstraite: Afin de s' assurer une bonne compréhension du texte source, le traducteur juridique se doit de maîtriser la macrostructure des genres textuels du droit, le style du langage juridique et la terminologie du champ thématique en question. C' est sur ce dernier aspect, la terminologie, que portera la présente étude. Plus concrètement, nous nous intéressons à certains termes du droit des successions qui ont une forme linguistique similaire en français et en espagnol. La proximité des langues et des systèmes juridiques concernés mène le traducteur à considérer que certains de ces termes désignent le même concept alors que ce n' est pas toujours le cas. Nous nous demandons si, entre les termes choisis, il existe véritablement une relation d' équivalence sémantique pleine ou si, au contraire, cette relation conceptuelle est asymétrique et imparfaite. La confirmation de cette dernière hypothèse signifierait l' identification de faux-amis dont il faudrait tenir compte pour éviter des erreurs de sens au moment d' opter pour une solution de traduction. Pour répondre à ces questions nous proposons une analyse comparative fondée sur la méthodologie du droit comparé et sur le concept d' équivalence fonctionnelle. L' intérêt d' une telle approche méthodologique pour le traitement de l' équivalence a été mis en relief dans plusieurs travaux portant sur la traduction juridique. En même temps elle permet de réfléchir sur l' acceptabilité de certaines techniques de traduction lorsque nous avons affaire à ce type de mots. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Direito Internacional is the property of Revista de Direito Internacional and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia is the property of Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This text, entitled (Legal Definition of the Professional Journalist: A Comparative Legal Study of the Constitutive Elements of Professionalism in Tunisian Law), aims at developing research and enriching the theoretical and epistemological reflection on the question of the status of the Tunisian professional journalist from a comparative law perspective, especially the media French law which has strongly inspired the Tunisian legislator, editor of the two decrees: 115 on the Freedom of the press and publishing and 116 on the Freedom of the audiovisual press and the creation of the High Authority regulating the audio-visual media. This is how we tried to specify the constituent elements of journalistic professionalism. The objective is to develop a specialized doctrine to clarify the ambiguity still characterizing the legal texts governing the status of the Tunisian professional journalist whose job has remained open to all walks of life for decades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Journal of Comparative Law / Revista Romana de Drept Comparat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)