Search

Introduction: This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to inform and compare the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and cost per improved outcome (CPIO) associated with more recently approved treatments for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (anti-AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: Clinical trials of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, efgartigimod intravenous (IV) and rozanolixizumab, and complement inhibitors, ravulizumab and zilucoplan, versus placebo (with background conventional treatment) were included in the primary NMA to compare efficacy and safety outcomes. The outputs from the NMAs were used to estimate NNT and NNH of each treatment versus placebo. CPIO (2024 USD) was estimated for a ≥ 3- or ≥ 5-point reduction from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. Sensitivity analyses were performed adding efgartigimod PH20 subcutaneous (SC) and eculizumab to the NMA. Results: Efgartigimod IV had the lowest NNT versus placebo for achieving a ≥ 3- and ≥ 5-point reduction in QMG, as well as a ≥ 5-point reduction in MG-ADL, whereas rozanolixizumab had the lowest NNT for a ≥ 3-point reduction in MG-ADL. The NNH versus placebo was similar across comparator treatments. Efgartigimod IV had the lowest CPIO among all treatments for all assessed efficacy outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with primary analysis and indicated that efgartigimod PH20 SC had comparable NNT and CPIO values to efgartigimod IV, whereas eculizumab had comparable NNT and higher CPIO values compared to other complement inhibitors. Conclusions: FcRn inhibitors and complement inhibitors assessed in this study all demonstrated clinical benefit in terms of NNT as well as an acceptable safety profile in terms of NNH. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, efgartigimod was associated with a favorable benefit–risk profile as well as a better economic value compared to ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan as treatments for anti-AChR Ab+ gMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) with anti-HMGCR antibody positivity is characterized by proximal extremity weakness, increased creatine kinase, and extensive muscle edema. There is an urgent need to find more appropriate treatment options for anti-HMGCR IMNM patients who do not respond well to conventional therapy in the acute phase. With the advent of targeted biologics, new treatment options are available. We report on a 66-year-old anti-HMGCR IMNM patient who initially presented with a 1-month history of progressive proximal extremity weakness and dysphagia with markedly elevated creatine kinase. The patient did not respond to conventional high-dose glucocorticoid and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, and his symptoms rapidly deteriorated over the 2 weeks after this treatment, with worsening limb weakness that prevented walking, marked proximal muscle atrophy, and weight loss. After one cycle (four infusions) of efgartigimod, the patient's symptoms improved markedly and he has since (for several months) remained in a good clinical state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Impending myasthenic crisis (IMC) is an emergent situation requiring aggressive management to prevent patients from developing myasthenic crisis (MC) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Efgartigimod has been proved to be well tolerated and efficacious in MG patients. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of efgartigimod and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in rescuing IMC. IMC patients treated with efgartigimod or IVIg were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome was determined as the mean change in MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score from baseline to week 1 and 4 after treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed based on medical records during the hospitalization to monitor the adverse events. A total of 9 patients treated with efgartigimod and 10 patients treated with IVIg were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics at baseline between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the IVIg group, the efgartigimod group had a greater reduction in the MG-ADL score at week 1 (P = 0.035) and week 4 (P = 0.005). One patient in the efgartigimod group had an upper respiratory infection. These findings suggest that efgartigimod is a treatment option for IMC in addition to IVIg and plasma exchange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in patients with refractory immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Methods: This open-label pilot observational study included seven patients with refractory IMNM, all of whom received intravenous efgartigimod treatment. The clinical response was assessed after 4 weeks of efgartigimod treatment according to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology–European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Serum levels of immunoglobulin as well as anti–signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti–3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and commercial line immunoblot assays. Safety assessments included evaluations of adverse events and severe adverse events. Results: The seven patients with refractory IMNM included five cases with anti-HMGCR antibodies and two cases within anti-SRP antibodies. Four of the seven patients achieved clinical responses. The total improvement score for the responders at 4 weeks were 32.5, 40.0, 47.5, and 70.0, and those at 8 weeks were 27.5, 47.5, 57.5, and 70.0. In comparison to the responsive patients, the non-responsive patients had longer durations [8 (-) versus 2 (1–5) years, P = 0.03], and more chronic myopathic features by muscle biopsy (67% versus 0%, P = 0.046). Serum immunoglobulin G levels (11.2 ± 2.5 versus 5.7 ± 2.5, P = 0.007) and anti-HMGCR/SRP antibody levels (97.2 ± 6.9 versus 41.8 ± 16.8, P = 0.002) were decreased after treatment compared with baseline levels. Adverse events were reported in one of the seven patients, who showed mild headache. Conclusions: Despite its small size, our study demonstrated that promoting the degradation of endogenous immunoglobulin G may be effective for patients with IMNM. Efgartigimod may be a promising option for cases of refractory IMNM to shorten duration and minimize chronic myopathic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease characterized by recurrent myelitis and optic neuritis. It is associated with high rates of relapse and disability. The main treatment strategies for acute attacks include intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) treatment and rescue treatment with plasma exchange (PLEX). Recently, the blockade of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-IgG interaction has gained momentum as a therapeutic strategy. Efgartigimod, the first approved FcRn inhibitor for treating generalized myasthenia gravis, has shown impressive safety, efficacy, and tolerability, and is being regarded as "PLEX in a bottle". Case description: We report a 65-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with anti-AQP4 antibody positive NMOSD. Add-on treatment with efgartigimod to IVMP and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) at the second acute relapse showed favorable results. Conclusion: This case suggests that efgartigimod is a potentially effective add-on therapy in acute attacks of AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a group of inflammatory brain disorders mediated by autoimmune responses. Anti-N-methyl-Daspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis, and anti-g-aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR) encephalitis are the most prevalent forms, characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal cell-surface antigens. Efgartigimod, an antagonist of the neonatal Fc receptor, has proven efficacy in myasthenia gravis treatment. This clinical case report describes the clinical progression and functional outcomes of AE in three patients who received efgartigimod treatment. Case presentations: Case 1 was a 60-year-old man exhibiting memory impairment and psychiatric disturbances over 11 days. Case 2 was a 38-yearold man with a 1-month history of rapid cognitive decline and seizures. Case 3 was a 68-year-old woman with mental behavioral changes and seizures for 4 months. Anti-GABABR, anti-LGI1, and anti-NMDAR antibodies were confirmed in the respective patients' cerebrospinal fluid or serum. All three patients experienced marked and swift symptomatic relief after four cycles of efgartigimod treatment, with no complication. Conclusion: Current first-line and second-line treatments for AE have limitations, and efgartigimod has demonstrated potential in the rapid and efficacious treatment of AE, emerging as a promising option for the management of this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Impending myasthenic crisis (IMC) is an emergent situation requiring aggressive management to prevent patients from developing myasthenic crisis (MC) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Efgartigimod has been proved to be well tolerated and efficacious in MG patients. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of efgartigimod and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in rescuing IMC. IMC patients treated with efgartigimod or IVIg were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome was determined as the mean change in MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score from baseline to week 1 and 4 after treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed based on medical records during the hospitalization to monitor the adverse events. A total of 9 patients treated with efgartigimod and 10 patients treated with IVIg were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics at baseline between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the IVIg group, the efgartigimod group had a greater reduction in the MG-ADL score at week 1 (P = 0.035) and week 4 (P = 0.005). One patient in the efgartigimod group had an upper respiratory infection. These findings suggest that efgartigimod is a treatment option for IMC in addition to IVIg and plasma exchange.

Abstract Background Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) can be managed with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis; e.g., pyridostigmine), corticosteroids, other immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., tacrolimus), and their combinations. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis (PLEX) may be administered if symptoms persist. PLEX and IVIg are also mainstays of treatment for myasthenic crisis. Recently, efgartigimod was approved in Japan for treating adults with gMG (irrespective of the antibody status) who do not have a sufficient response to corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies. Efgartigimod is generally safe and well tolerated. However, since phase III trials of efgartigimod excluded those with myasthenic crisis, the efficacy of efgartigimod in treating myasthenic crisis is still unclear. Moreover, there are no reports that efgartigimod therapy can reduce the dose of corticosteroids needed to achieve a minimal manifestation status. Case presentation We report the case of a 70-yeat-old woman with gMG who developed a myasthenic crisis. After she was diagnosed with gMG, the patient had been treated with oral corticosteroids and tacrolimus for 1 year. However, she refused to continue taking the medication, and two weeks later, she developed ptosis, dysphagia and dyspnea. The patient was intubated and treated with efgartigimod in combination with steroid therapy, and she recovered without PLEX or IVIg. Afterward, when she experienced worsening of fatigue and increased levels of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, efgartigimod therapy was effective. The patient achieved minimal manifestation status even after the reduction of corticosteroids and showed improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales after 4 cycles of efgartigimod infusion. Conclusions Our case suggests that efgartigimod can be an alternative drug for achieving minimal manifestation status in patients with myasthenic crisis. Considering its strong efficacy and safety, efgartigimod could be expanded to use as bridging therapy in the acute and chronic phases of gMG.

Introduction/Aims: Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc‐receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short‐ and long‐term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG. Methods: Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15‐item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG‐QoL15r). Results: A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG‐ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG‐ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4‐weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients. Discussion: In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anti leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is the second most common AE, where the trafficking and recycling of the pathogenic immunoglobulin (IgG) can be controlled by the neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn), making the latter as a candidate therapeutic target. Efgartigimod is an antagonist of FcRn, its ability to increase the degradation of IgGs and improve the health and quality of life of patients. ADAPT trail indicated its rapid efficacy and safety on myasthenia gravis. However, there is currently no case reported using efgartigimod for the treatment of anti-LGI1-associated AE. Case description: The patient presented with five episodes of generalized tonic–clonic seizures in the past 2 weeks. The patient had no abnormal signs on magnetic resonance imaging. Electroencephalogram examinations showed an increase in bilateral symmetric or asymmetric slow activity, without any clear epileptic waves. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination results indicated a slight increase in protein (47 mg/dL). The anti-LGI1 antibody titer in serum was 1:100 and that in CSF was 1:3.2. The treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg once a day combined with levetiracetam tablets failed to completely control the patient's seizures. Thus, 10 mg/kg efgartigimod was administered intravenously once a week for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks of treatment, serum levels of anti-LGI1 antibody and IgG decreased and the patient's epilepsy did not recur in the next 3 months. Conclusions: This is the first case report of using efgartigimod to treat anti-LGI1-associated AE. The combination of efgartigimod and methylprednisolone resulted in favorable outcomes, indicating that this is an optional treatment plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the long‐term treatment of a 38‐year‐old man with generalized thymoma‐associated myasthenia gravis who was treated with efgartigimod. He received chemotherapy and oral prednisolone before the thymectomy. However, after initial improvement in symptoms, he deteriorated and needed continuous noninvasive positive‐pressure ventilation, with the highest Myasthenia Gravis‐Activities of Daily Living score of 14. Immunosuppressive therapy and plasma exchange showed limited benefit, and the anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody titer peaked to 130 nmol/L. Seven cycles of efgartigimod treatment were administered, which improved the symptoms, achieving a Myasthenia Gravis‐Actvities of Daily Living score of 0. The anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody titer fluctuated until the end of the fifth cycle, thereafter, plateauing at 22 nmol/L. These findings allowed the prednisolone dose to be tapered and the interval between the treatment cycles to be increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies can lead to the formation of autoimmune diseases through Fab and/or Fc-mediated interactions with host molecules as well as activated T cells. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binds at acidic pH IgG and albumin, and the mechanism for prolonging serum IgG half-life is making IgG re-entry into circulation by prompting it not to be degraded by lysosomes and back to the cell surface. Given the FcRn receptor's essential role in IgG homeostasis, one of the strategies to promote the quick degradation of endogenous IgG is to suppress the function of FcRn, which is beneficial to the treatment of IgG-driven autoimmune disorders like myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), stiff person syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We elaborately read the literature about efgartigimod and systematically reviewed the research progress and clinical application of this novel FcRn inhibitor in autoimmune diseases. Efgartigimod is the firstly FcRn antagonist developed and was approved on 17 December 2021 by the United States for the therapy of acetylcholine receptor-positive MG. In January 2022, efgartigimod received its second regulatory approval in Japan. In addition, the market authorization application in Europe was submitted and validated in August 2021. China's National Medical Products Administration officially accepted the marketing application of efgartigimod on July 13, 2022. To suppress the function of FcRn, which is beneficial to the treatment of IgG-driven autoimmune disorders like MG, CIDP, ITP, and stiff person syndrome. We review the rationale, clinical evidence, and future perspectives of efgartigimod for the treatment of autoimmune disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) can be managed with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis; e.g., pyridostigmine), corticosteroids, other immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., tacrolimus), and their combinations. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis (PLEX) may be administered if symptoms persist. PLEX and IVIg are also mainstays of treatment for myasthenic crisis. Recently, efgartigimod was approved in Japan for treating adults with gMG (irrespective of the antibody status) who do not have a sufficient response to corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies. Efgartigimod is generally safe and well tolerated. However, since phase III trials of efgartigimod excluded those with myasthenic crisis, the efficacy of efgartigimod in treating myasthenic crisis is still unclear. Moreover, there are no reports that efgartigimod therapy can reduce the dose of corticosteroids needed to achieve a minimal manifestation status. Case presentation: We report the case of a 70-yeat-old woman with gMG who developed a myasthenic crisis. After she was diagnosed with gMG, the patient had been treated with oral corticosteroids and tacrolimus for 1 year. However, she refused to continue taking the medication, and two weeks later, she developed ptosis, dysphagia and dyspnea. The patient was intubated and treated with efgartigimod in combination with steroid therapy, and she recovered without PLEX or IVIg. Afterward, when she experienced worsening of fatigue and increased levels of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, efgartigimod therapy was effective. The patient achieved minimal manifestation status even after the reduction of corticosteroids and showed improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales after 4 cycles of efgartigimod infusion. Conclusions: Our case suggests that efgartigimod can be an alternative drug for achieving minimal manifestation status in patients with myasthenic crisis. Considering its strong efficacy and safety, efgartigimod could be expanded to use as bridging therapy in the acute and chronic phases of gMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Efgartigimod (Efgartigimod alpha fcab, Vyvgart™) is a pioneering neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonist for the treatment of severe autoimmune diseases mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies, including myasthenia gravis (MG). It is a well-tolerated drug with minor side effects, such as headache and upper respiratory (lung) and urinary tract infections. Here, we present a case of Kaposi's varicelliform eruption (KVE) and herpetic conjunctivitis related to efgartigimod in a 60-year-old patient with ocular MG (OMG). Case description: A 60-year-old Chinese male suffered from acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR Ab+) OMG for 8 years. During this period, he underwent first-line treatment with systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and so on, but had poor symptom improvement. On the recommendation of his attending neurologist, he received one cycle of intravenous efgartigimod (10mg/kg, once weekly for 4 weeks). The patient experienced fever, widespread painful blisters, and edema on the face on the third day after his last intravenous infusion. The patient also complained of increased secretions and a foreign body sensation in both eyes. Laboratory tests confirmed infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). A diagnosis of efgartigimod-associated KVE and herpetic conjunctivitis was made. After intravenous administration (5mg/kg, 3 times a day, every 8 hours) for 10 days, the patient was cured without residual complications. Conclusions: This case is the first report of a patient with KVE and herpetic conjunctivitis related to efgartigimod in PubMed. This is rare and unusual. Clinicians should be alert to the rare symptoms related to efgartigimod. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Efgartigimod is effective and well-tolerated in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the therapeutic potential and the safety profile of efgartigimod in myasthenic crisis (MC) remained largely unknown. Methods: This is an observational, prospective, multicenter, real-world study to follow 2 MC patients who initiated efgartigimod as a first-line rescue therapy and 8 cases who used it as an add-on therapy. Baseline demographic features and immunotherapies were collected, and the MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scale was evaluated every week since efgartigimod treatment for 8 weeks. Additionally, serum IgG and anti-AChR antibody levels and the peripheral CD4+ T lymphocytes were measured before and after one cycle of treatment. Results: Ten patients with MC were enrolled in the study, including 9 anti-AChR antibody positive and 1 anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) positive. All patients were successfully weaned from the ventilation after receiving efgartigimod treatment, with a length of 10.44 ± 4.30 days. After one cycle of infusions, the MG-ADL score reduced from 15.6 ± 4.4 at the baseline to 3.4 ± 2.2, while the corticosteroid dose was tapered from 55.0 ± 20.7 mg to 26.0 ± 14.1 mg. The proportions of regulatory T cells and naïve T cells (% in CD4+ T) significantly decreased post-efgartigimod treatment (5.48 ± 1.23 vs. 6.90 ± 1.80, P=0.0313, and 34.98 ± 6.47 vs. 43.68 ± 6.54, P=0.0313, respectively). Conclusion: These findings validated the rapid action of efgartigimod in facilitating the weaning process with a good safety profile in patients with MC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: This study was undertaken to highlight neonatal Fc receptor inhibition (efgartigimod) as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) and to emphasize the concept that seronegative MG is greatly constrained by the limitations of currently available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures. Methods: We describe the first refractory, generalized MG (gMG) patient successfully treated with efgartigimod after testing negative on standard autoantibody detection tests. Results: Our patient presented with severe fluctuating bulbar and generalized weakness, resulting in multiple myasthenic crises requiring intubation. After a 28‐year medical history of multiple failed lines of treatment, our patient was started on efgartigimod. Over five treatment cycles, a definite improvement in her clinical condition was observed (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class: IIIb to IIb; MG‐Activities of Daily Living score: 11 to 0; MG‐Quality of Life 15 score: 30 to 0; Quantitative MG score: 28 to 6). Standard autoantibody detection tests failed to detect known pathogenic autoantibodies, but cell‐based assay (CBA) identified autoantibodies against clustered adult acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Conclusions: In light of recent approvals of efgartigimod by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration exclusively for AChR‐positive gMG forms, our case highlights evidence suggesting that such an approach might be shortsighted and could limit therapeutic options for patients with refractory seronegative gMG. Additionally, introducing more sensitive analytical techniques, exemplified by CBA, may help bridge the gap between seronegative and seropositive patients. This represents an urgent unmet need for gMG patients, as the antibody profile dramatically influences the therapeutic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the efficacy of efgartigimod demonstrated in ADAPT phase 3 trial, data specifically derived from Chinese participants are not available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in Chinese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in 8 hospitals across China. gMG patients received weekly intravenous infusions of efgartigimod (10  mg/kg) under a named patient program (NPP). The present study is an 8-week study, consisting of 4 consecutive doses of efgartigimod administered over 3  weeks (one cycle), followed by a 5-week follow-up period to assess the tolerability of efgartigimod’s therapeutic effects. The primary outcome was the mean change in MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) total score from baseline to 4  weeks. MG-ADL responder was defined as a ≥  2-point improvement that persisted for 4  weeks, starting by week 4. Safety evaluations encompassed the monitoring of adverse events (AE) and serious AE (SAE) throughout the study. Results: Between 5 July 2022 and 25 August 2023, a total of 14 gMG patients were included. The mean age was 57.7  years, with a mean MG-ADL score of 10.86  ±  3.32. At week 4, MG-ADL scores showed a mean reduction of 6 points, reaching a maximum decline of 13 points. Among the patients, 85.7% (12/14) achieved MG-ADL responder status after one cycle of treatment. The most significant reduction in quantitative MG (QMG) scores also occurred at week 4, with a mean decrease of 7 points. Notably, the improvements in MG-ADL and QMG scores persisted until week 8. During treatment and follow-up period, only two mild neck rashes occurred and resolved promptly. No infections or SAE were reported. Discussion: A single cycle of efgartigimod treatment demonstrates effectiveness and the tolerability through week 8, with no new safety signals observed in Chinese gMG patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe prevalence of patients positive for muscle-specific kinase antibody (hereafter, MuSK-Ab) accounts for 5–8% of all myasthenia gravis (MG) cases. Currently, efgartigimod has shown good therapeutic effects in MUSK-Ab-positive MG patients in a phase III clinical trial. However, phase III clinical trials tend to exclude MG patients in exacerbation, and there are only few real-world studies on the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive myasthenic crisis (MC) patients. This retrospective, real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive MG with exacerbation.MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of four MuSK-Ab-positive patients with exacerbation of MG who received efgartigimod at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, including two patients with MC. All patients were admitted between September 2023 and May 2024. Most patients are simultaneously undergoing rituximab treatment.ResultsEach patient completed one cycle of efgartigimod. After the first administration, four patients showed a clinically meaningful decrease in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score (a reduction of more than 4 points compared to baseline), and all patients showed a decrease in IgG levels after one cycle of efgartigimod. Regarding safety, none of the patients experienced any obvious adverse effects. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved the minimal symptom expression status (an MG-ADL score of 0 or 1) following the first administration of efgartigimod for 8.75 ± 5.56 weeks. This article presents a case involving a patient who exhibited prompt alleviation of symptoms following the administration of a high dose of efgartigimod (20 mg/kg, given on days 1 and 5), without the use of any other fast-acting treatment.ConclusionThis retrospective real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in these four MuSK-Ab-positive, female Asian patients with exacerbation of MG, as well as in patients experiencing MC. It is important to note that efgartigimod should not be viewed as a substitute for foundational immunotherapy; rather, it is intended as a rescue treatment during exacerbations and as an adjunctive therapy in the context of long-term immunotherapy. This non-invasive approach has the potential to become another treatment option for MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) with anti-HMGCR antibody positivity is characterized by proximal extremity weakness, increased creatine kinase, and extensive muscle edema. There is an urgent need to find more appropriate treatment options for anti-HMGCR IMNM patients who do not respond well to conventional therapy in the acute phase. With the advent of targeted biologics, new treatment options are available. We report on a 66-year-old anti-HMGCR IMNM patient who initially presented with a 1-month history of progressive proximal extremity weakness and dysphagia with markedly elevated creatine kinase. The patient did not respond to conventional high-dose glucocorticoid and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, and his symptoms rapidly deteriorated over the 2 weeks after this treatment, with worsening limb weakness that prevented walking, marked proximal muscle atrophy, and weight loss. After one cycle (four infusions) of efgartigimod, the patient’s symptoms improved markedly and he has since (for several months) remained in a good clinical state.

ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in patients with refractory immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).MethodsThis open-label pilot observational study included seven patients with refractory IMNM, all of whom received intravenous efgartigimod treatment. The clinical response was assessed after 4 weeks of efgartigimod treatment according to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology–European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Serum levels of immunoglobulin as well as anti–signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti–3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and commercial line immunoblot assays. Safety assessments included evaluations of adverse events and severe adverse events.ResultsThe seven patients with refractory IMNM included five cases with anti-HMGCR antibodies and two cases within anti-SRP antibodies. Four of the seven patients achieved clinical responses. The total improvement score for the responders at 4 weeks were 32.5, 40.0, 47.5, and 70.0, and those at 8 weeks were 27.5, 47.5, 57.5, and 70.0. In comparison to the responsive patients, the non-responsive patients had longer durations [8 (-) versus 2 (1–5) years, P = 0.03], and more chronic myopathic features by muscle biopsy (67% versus 0%, P = 0.046). Serum immunoglobulin G levels (11.2 ± 2.5 versus 5.7 ± 2.5, P = 0.007) and anti-HMGCR/SRP antibody levels (97.2 ± 6.9 versus 41.8 ± 16.8, P = 0.002) were decreased after treatment compared with baseline levels. Adverse events were reported in one of the seven patients, who showed mild headache.ConclusionsDespite its small size, our study demonstrated that promoting the degradation of endogenous immunoglobulin G may be effective for patients with IMNM. Efgartigimod may be a promising option for cases of refractory IMNM to shorten duration and minimize chronic myopathic features.

IntroductionAutoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a group of inflammatory brain disorders mediated by autoimmune responses. Anti–N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, anti–leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis, and anti–γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR) encephalitis are the most prevalent forms, characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal cell-surface antigens. Efgartigimod, an antagonist of the neonatal Fc receptor, has proven efficacy in myasthenia gravis treatment. This clinical case report describes the clinical progression and functional outcomes of AE in three patients who received efgartigimod treatment.Case presentationsCase 1 was a 60-year-old man exhibiting memory impairment and psychiatric disturbances over 11 days. Case 2 was a 38-year-old man with a 1-month history of rapid cognitive decline and seizures. Case 3 was a 68-year-old woman with mental behavioral changes and seizures for 4 months. Anti-GABABR, anti-LGI1, and anti-NMDAR antibodies were confirmed in the respective patients’ cerebrospinal fluid or serum. All three patients experienced marked and swift symptomatic relief after four cycles of efgartigimod treatment, with no complication.ConclusionCurrent first-line and second-line treatments for AE have limitations, and efgartigimod has demonstrated potential in the rapid and efficacious treatment of AE, emerging as a promising option for the management of this disease.

Myasthenia gravis with positive MuSK antibody often involves the bulbar muscles and is usually refractory to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. For MuSK-MG patients who experience acute exacerbations and do not respond to conventional treatments, there is an urgent need to find more suitable treatment options. With the advent of biologic agents, efgartigimod has shown promising results in the treatment of MG. We report a 65-year-old MuSK-MG patient who presented with impaired eye movements initially, and the symptoms rapidly worsened within a week, affecting the limbs and neck muscles, and had difficulties in chewing and swallowing. Lymphoplasmapheresis did not achieve satisfactory results, but after a cycle of efgartigimod treatment, the patient’s symptoms gradually improved and remained in a good clinical state for several months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Efgartigimod showed efficacy for generalized myasthenia gravis. • Effect of efgartigimod in seronegative generalized myasthenia gravis is unknown. • 16 seronegative generalized myasthenia gravis patients treated with efgartigimod. • Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living scores improved from 9.2 to 7.4. • There were no serious adverse events. The effect of treatment with efgartigimod in seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate symptomatic changes and safety of treatment with efgartigimod in patients with generalized MG (gMG) double-seronegative for acetylcholine receptor antibody and muscle-specific kinase antibody. We reviewed the medical records of double-seronegative gMG treated with 10 mg/kg efgartigimod once/week per cycle (4 weeks) from June 2022 to June 2023. A total of 16 patients were included. MG–activities of daily living (ADL) scores improved from 9.2 to 7.4. Mean prednisolone dose was reduced from 5.4 to 4.1 mg/day. The duration before MG–ADL deterioration after the end of a cycle was 6.1 weeks. Five patients had mild adverse events. This retrospective study revealed no significant treatment benefit in the outcomes of patients with double-seronegative gMG treated with efgartigimod. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) is caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Efgartigimod, a human IgG antibody Fc fragment that acts as a natural ligand for the FcRn, can increase IgG degradation, which thus may be a promising therapeutic drug for GBS. Case presentation: The two patients presented with postinfectious and acute flaccid paralysis. On admission, they were bedridden. Nerve conduction studies indicated peripheral neuropathy. GBS was suspected and they are treated with two doses of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) within 5 days. Their muscle strength improved gradually and 4 weeks after the initial dose, they could walk independently. Following the first dose, Patient 1 complaint of muscle soreness, which subsided the next morning. Patient 2 was intubated due to respiratory failure the day after the initial dose, and did not report other adverse effects. Discussion: In GBS patients, two doses of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) were effective in rapidly improving muscle strength, with a satisfactory safety profile. The findings suggest a potential role for efgartigimod in modifying the disease process in GBS patients. Conclusion: Efgartigimod seems effective and safe in the treatment of GBS. This study indicates the potential role of efgartigimod as a novel treatment option for GBS. Well-designed clinical trials should be conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recommendations for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been difficult to develop because of limited evidence from large randomized controlled trials. New drugs and treatment approaches have recently been shown to be effective in phase 3 studies in seropositive generalized (g) MG. One such drug is efgartigimod, a human-Fc-fragment of IgG1, with a high affinity for the endosomal FcRn. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety effects of efgartigimod in 22 gMG patients. We evaluated the strategies for the timing of re-treatment with it. The participants received a total of 59 efgartigimod -treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–6). Twenty patients (86.3%) improved by at least 2 MG-ADL points after the first treatment cycle. The median MG-ADL score at baseline was 6.5 (range: 3–17) and 2.5 (range: 0–9) post-treatment (p < 0.001). A consistent improvement of at least 2 points in the MG-ADL score after each cycle occurs in 18 patients. The effect duration of the treatment was usually between 4 and 12 weeks. Two major clinical patterns of treatment response were found. Treatment with efgartigimod was also associated with significant reductions of prednisone doses Overall, the treatment was safe and associated with only minor adverse events. The single fatality was apparently due tosevere respiratory failure. We found that efgartigimod is clinically effective, may be used as a steroid sparing agent and is generally safe for gMG patients. We recommend a personalized preventive treatment approach until clinical stabilization, followed by discontinuation and periodic evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score. Results: Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. Methods: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). Results: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): – 52.6 (– 103.0, – 2.3)], at week 4 [– 4.0 (– 6.6, – 1.4)], and at time of best response [– 3.9 (– 6.5, – 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [– 1.9 (– 3.3, – 0.5)] and at time of best response [– 1.4 (– 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [– 3.2 (– 5.2, – 1.2)] and at time of best response [– 3.0 (– 5.0, – 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [– 8.7 (– 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [– 13.7 (– 50.3, 22.9)]. Conclusion: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by fluctuating muscle weakness. Severe patients may develop life-threatening respiratory failure and experience crisis. Plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is the first-line treatment option for myasthenia crisis, but some patients still poorly respond to them. Here, we first reported a generalized MG patient from China who was in a state of impending myasthenic crisis and did not respond effectively to IVIg but was successfully rescued by add-on efgartigimod. Especially, we also detected meaningful changes in T-cell and B-cell subsets after efgartigimod, promoting a potential role of efgartigimod in re-establishing immune homeostasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is always a lack of effective treatment for highly active refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG). Recently, telitacicept combined with efgartigimod significantly reduces circulating B cells, plasma cells, and immunoglobulin G, which brings promising therapeutic strategies. We report a case of a 37-year-old female patient with refractory GMG, whose condition got significant improvement and control with this latest treatment after multiple unsuccessful therapies of immunosuppressants. The new combination deserves further attention in the therapeutic application of myasthenia gravis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to block IgG cycling are two novel and successful mechanisms. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 18, 2023. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. Results: We pooled 532 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared to the placebo, the FcRn inhibitors were more efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) (MD = − 1.69 [− 2.35, − 1.03], P < 0.00001), MG-ADL responder (RR = 2.01 [1.62, 2.48], P < 0.00001), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) (MD = − 2.45 [− 4.35, − 0.55], P = 0.01), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (MD = − 2.97 [− 4.27, − 1.67], P < 0.00001), 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL15r) (MD = − 2.52 [− 3.54, − 1.50], P < 0.00001), without increasing the risk of safety. The subgroup analysis showed that efgartigimod was more effective than placebo in MG-ADL responders. Rozanolixizumab was more effective than the placebo except in QMG, and batoclimab was more effective than the placebo except in MG-ADL responder. Nipocalizumab did not show satisfactory efficacy in all outcomes. With the exception of rozanolixizumab, all drugs showed non-inferior safety profiles to placebo. Conclusion: FcRn inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in patients with MG. Among them, efgartigimod and nipocalimab were effective without causing an increased safety risk. Rozanolixizumab, despite its superior efficacy, caused an increased incidence of adverse events. Current evidence does not suggest that nipocalimab is effective in patients with MG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease with humoral and cellular autoimmunity causing demyelination of peripheral nerves, commonly treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), encoded by the FCGRT gene, prevents the degradation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by recycling circulating IgG. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGRT gene is associated with different expression levels of mRNA and protein. Thus, patients with genotypes associated with relatively low FcRn expression may show a poorer treatment response to IVIg due to increased IVIg degradation. Methods: VNTR genotypes were analyzed in 144 patients with CIDP. Patients' clinical data, including neurological scores and treatment data, were collected as part of the Immune‐Mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry. Results: Most patients (n = 124, 86%) were VNTR 3/3 homozygotes, and 20 patients (14%) were VNTR 2/3 heterozygotes. Both VNTR 3/3 and VNTR 2/3 genotype groups showed no difference in clinical disability and immunoglobulin dosage. However, patients with a VNTR 2 allele were more likely to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg) than patients homozygous for the VNTR 3 allele (25% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive second‐line therapy (75% vs. 54%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The VNTR 2/3 genotype is associated with the administration of SCIg, possibly reflecting a greater benefit from SCIg due to more constant immunoglobulin levels without lower IVIg levels between the treatment circles. Also, the greater need for second‐line treatment in VNTR 2/3 patients could be an indirect sign of a lower response to immunoglobulins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Inhibition of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) for IgG is a promising new therapeutic strategy for antibody‐mediated disorders. We report our real‐life experience with efgartigimod (EFG) in 19 patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) along a clinical follow‐up of 14 months. Methods: EFG was administered according to the GENERATIVE protocol (consisting of a Fixed period of two treatment cycles [given 1 month apart] of four infusions at weekly intervals, followed by a Flexible period of re‐cycling in case of worsening). Eight patients were positive for acetylcholine receptor antibody, four for muscle‐specific tyrosine kinase antibody, and two for lipoprotein‐related protein 4 antibody, and five were classified as triple negative. Efficacy of EFG was assessed by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Myasthenia Gravis Composite, and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scales. Results: Fifty‐three percent of patients needed three treatment cycles, 26% needed four, and 21% needed five along the 14‐month clinical follow‐up. Meaningful improvement was observed at the end of each cycle with the clinical scores adopted. EFG had a dramatic effect on disease course, as during the year before treatment eight of 19 patients (42%) were hospitalized, and 15 of 19 (79%) needed treatment with plasma exchange or immunoglobulins; three of 19 (16%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. During EFG, none of the patients was hospitalized and only one patient required plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins. No major side effects or infusion‐related reactions occurred. Conclusions: We observed that EFG was safe and modified significantly the course of the disease along a 14‐month follow‐up. Our experience strengthens the role of FcRn inhibition as an effective new tool for long‐term treatment of gMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is sometimes used as maintenance therapy for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). Efgartigimod is a newly approved monoclonal antibody targeting the neonatal Fc receptor, effectively reducing immunoglobulin G levels in the treatment of MG. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical experience of switching patients from maintenance TPE treatment to efgartigimod infusions. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on patients previously treated with maintenance TPE for the diagnosis of MG and subsequently switched to efgartigimod infusions. Clinical characteristics and response to treatment switch were described. Results: Five of seven patients demonstrated improvement on Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America‐post intervention status, one was unchanged and one was in pharmacological remission. This was reflected in pre‐ and postswitch MG activities of daily living and MG manual muscle testing scores. All patients have continued on efgartigimod therapy. The duration of treatment with efgartigimod at the time of this review ranged from 1 to 13 months. Recurrent uncomplicated infections were noted in two patients on efgartigimod therapy. Maintenance dosing regimens of efgartigimod varied based on clinical response to treatment and side effects. Discussion: In this series, efgartigimod appeared effective and well tolerated in patients switched from TPE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Yusuf A Rajabally1,2 1Inflammatory Neuropathy Clinic, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom; 2Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United KingdomCorrespondence: Yusuf A Rajabally, Inflammatory Neuropathy Clinic, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom, Email y.rajabally@aston.ac.ukAbstract: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a treatable autoimmune disorder, for which different treatment options are available. Current first-line evidence-based therapies for CIDP include intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids and plasma exchanges. Despite lack of evidence, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used in circumstances of refractoriness and, more debatably, of perceived overdependence on first-line therapies. Rituximab is currently the object of a randomized controlled trial for CIDP. Based on case series, and although rarely considered, haematopoietic autologous stem cell transplants may be effective in refractory disease, with low mortality and high remission rates. A new therapeutic option has appeared with efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, recently shown to significantly lower relapse rate versus placebo, after withdrawal from previous immunotherapy. Other neonatal Fc receptor blockers, nipocalimab and batoclimab, are under study. The C1 complement-inhibitor SAR445088, acting in the proximal portion of the classical complement system, is currently the subject of a new study in treatment-responsive, refractory and treatment-naïve subjects. Finally, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, which exert anti-B cell effects, may represent another future research avenue. The widening of the therapeutic armamentarium enhances the need for improved evaluation of treatment effects and reliable biomarkers in CIDP.Keywords: CIDP, immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, plasma exchange, efgartigimod

Objective: ADAPT+ assessed the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod in adult participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: ADAPT+ was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, up to 3-year extension of the pivotal phase 3 ADAPT study. Efgartigimod was administered in treatment cycles of 4 intravenous infusions (one 10 mg/kg infusion per week). Initiation of subsequent treatment cycles was individualized based on clinical evaluation. Safety endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events. Efficacy endpoints assessed disease severity using Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Results: As of January 2022, 151 participants had rolled over to ADAPT+ and 145 had received ≥1 dose of efgartigimod, of whom, 111 (76.6%) were AChR-Ab+ and 34 (23.4%) were AChR-Ab-. Mean study duration (treatment plus follow-up) was 548 days, and participants received up to 17 treatment cycles, corresponding to 217.6 participant-years of exposure. In the overall population, 123 (84.8%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were headache (36 [24.8%]), COVID-19 (22 [15.2%]), and nasopharyngitis (20 [13.8%]). Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was seen as early as 1 week following the first infusion across multiple cycles in AChR-Ab+ and AChR-Ab-participants. Maximal MG-ADL and QMG improvements aligned with onset and magnitude of total IgG and AChR-Ab reductions. For AChR-Ab+ participants at any time point in each of the first 10 treatment cycles, more than 90% had a maximum reduction of ≥2 points (CMI) in MG-ADL total score; across the 7 cycles in which QMG was measured, 69.4% to 91.3% of participants demonstrated a maximum reduction of ≥3 points (CMI) in QMG total score. Many participants demonstrated improvements well beyond CMI thresholds. In AChR-Ab+ participants with ≥1 year of combined follow-up between ADAPT and ADAPT+, mean number of annualized cycles was 4.7 per year (median [range] 5.0 [0.5-7.6]). Conclusion: Results of ADAPT+ corroborate the substantial clinical improvements seen with efgartigimod in ADAPT and support its long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy, as well as an individualized dosing regimen for treatment of gMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myasthenic crisis, a life-threatening exacerbation of myasthenia gravis, is a significant clinical challenge, particularly when refractory to standard therapies. Here, we described a case of myasthenic crisis in which the patient transitioned from refractory myasthenic crisis to minimal symptom expression after receiving add-on treatment with efgartigimod, a novel neonatal Fc receptor antagonist. A 54 years-old woman who was diagnosed with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis experienced respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation. Despite aggressive treatment with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins, and high-dose corticosteroids, her condition continued to deteriorate, culminating in persistent myasthenic crisis. Efgartigimod was administered as salvage therapy. Remarkable improvement in neuromuscular function was observed within days, allowing for successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Over the subsequent weeks, the patient's symptoms continued to ameliorate, ultimately reaching a state of minimal symptom expression. Serial assessments of her serum antiacetylcholine receptor antibody titer showed a consistent decline in parallel with this clinical improvement. This case highlights efgartigimod's potential as an effective therapeutic option for refractory myasthenic crisis, offering new hope for patients facing this life-threatening condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by autoantibodies targeting type XVII collagen (Col17) with the noncollagenous 16A (NC16A) ectodomain representing the immunodominant site. The role of additional extracellular targets of Col17 outside NC16A has not been unequivocally demonstrated. In this study, we showed that Col17 ectodomain‐reactive patient sera depleted in NC16A IgG induced dermal–epidermal separation in a cryosection model indicating the pathogenic potential of anti‐Col17 non‐NC16A extracellular IgG. Moreover, injection of IgG targeting the murine Col17 NC14–1 domains (downstream of NC15A, the murine homologue of human NC16A) into C57BL/6J mice resulted in erythematous skin lesions and erosions. Clinical findings were accompanied by IgG/C3 deposits along the basement membrane and subepidermal blistering with inflammatory infiltrates. Disease development was significantly reduced in either Fc‐gamma receptor (FcγR)‐ or complement‐5a receptor‐1 (C5aR1)‐deficient mice. Inhibition of the neonatal FcR (FcRn), an atypical FcγR regulating IgG homeostasis, with the murine Fc fragment IgG2c‐ABDEG, a derivative of efgartigimod, reduced anti‐NC14–1 IgG levels, resulting in ameliorated skin inflammation compared with isotype‐treated controls. These data demonstrate that the pathogenic effects of IgG targeting the Col17 domain outside human NC16A/murine NC15A are partly attributable to antibody‐mediated FcγR‐ and C5aR1 effector mechanisms while pharmacological inhibition of the FcRn represents a promising treatment for BP. The mouse model of BP will be instrumental in further investigating the role of Col17 non‐NC16A/NC15A extracellular epitopes and validating new therapies for this disease. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic, neuromuscular autoimmune disease mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Patients with gMG experience debilitating muscle weakness, resulting in impaired mobility, speech, swallowing, vision and respiratory function. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment engineered for increased binding affinity to neonatal Fc receptor. The neonatal Fc receptor blockade by efgartigimod competitively inhibits endogenous IgG binding, leading to decreased IgG recycling and increased degradation resulting in lower IgG concentration. Methods: The safety and efficacy of efgartigimod were evaluated in the ADAPT study. Key efficacy outcome measures included Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Efgartigimod demonstrated significant improvement in both the MG‐ADL and QMG scores. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether all subdomains of MG‐ADL and QMG improved with efgartigimod treatment. Individual items of MG‐ADL and QMG were grouped into four subdomains: bulbar, ocular, limb/gross motor and respiratory. Change from baseline over 10 weeks in each subdomain was calculated for each group. Results: Greater improvements from baseline were seen across MG‐ADL subdomains in participants treated with efgartigimod compared with placebo. These improvements were typically observed 1 to 2 weeks after the first infusion and correlated with reductions in IgG. Similar results were observed across most QMG subdomains. Conclusions: These post hoc analyses of MG‐ADL and QMG subdomain data from ADAPT suggest that efgartigimod is beneficial in improving muscle function and strength across all muscle groups, leading to the observed efficacy in participants with gMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stiff-person syndrome (SPS) is a rare autoimmune neurological disorder characterized by high titers of antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) causing impaired GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission. To date, there is not a defined therapy for such condition, but immunomodulating therapies, such as plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulins, and rituximab, have been widely used in clinical practice. However, the efficacy and tolerability of these treatments is not well established. Efgartigimod, a new neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker, is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment engineered with increased affinity for FcRn binding, leading to a reduction in IgGs levels, including pathogenic IgG autoantibody showing promising results in neurological autoimmune disorders and has been approved for the treatment of AChR-seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). In this study, we report and describe the first data on treatment with efgartigimod in three patients affected by both AChR-seropositive generalized MG and anti-GAD-seropositive SPS. Patients were followed since the start of efgartigimod and for the whole treatment period (12 weeks). MG symptoms were assessed with the "MG activity of daily living score" and the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score, while SPS ones were assessed with the "SPS activity of daily living score"; muscle strength was assessed with the Medical Research Council Sum score; the overall disability from MG and SPS was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. All patients showed an improvement in symptoms of both SPS and MG after 2 cycles of treatment. Our data suggest that efgartigimod may be considered as a candidate drug for SPS and other autoantibody-mediated neurological disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: Efgartigimod is a neonatal Fc receptor blocker and was the first approved medication in its class for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). As a novel therapy, little is known about the use of efgartigimod in clinical practice. This study aims to describe how efgartigimod is being incorporated into the current therapeutic landscape of MG. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 17 patients with gMG treated with efgartigimod at the University of Pennsylvania between January 2022 and June 2023. Results: Efgartigimod was selected mainly for patients who were treatment refractory, had side effects to other treatments, and/or required quick improvement in their symptoms. All patients had been previously treated with at least one medication for MG and had an average baseline Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL) score of 9.1. The patients treated with efgartigimod improved their MG‐ADL score by an average of 5.5 points at 3 months (p <.001) and 7.1 points by 6 months (p <.001). Forty percent of patients achieved minimal symptom expression. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 43.7% of patients on efgartigimod, the most common being mild infection (urinary tract infection and thrush). There were no serious AEs. Discussion: This study found efgartigimod to be efficacious, well tolerated, and safe in patients with MG. Efgartigimod should be considered as an add‐on therapy, a bridge therapy, or as a monotherapy if patients have difficulty tolerating other treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a central nervous system demyelinating disease. Current therapy methods, however, have limited effect on acute attacks except for intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). Efgartigimod is a first-in-class novel human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc fragment approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Its capacity to rapidly decrease serum IgG levels, including pathogenic autoantibodies, positions it as a potentially effective option for managing the acute phase of NMOSD. Case presentation: We report the case of a 59-year-old female patient with acute NMOSD, presenting with vision loss and numbness in all four limbs. Despite an initial inadequate response to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the addition of Efgartigimod to her treatment regimen led to rapid improvement, notably including a significant reduction in serum aquaporin-4 antibody titers, total IgG levels, and inflammation cytokine levels. Furthermore, no adverse events were reported during a four-month follow-up period. Conclusion: As an adjunct to glucocorticoid therapy, Efgartigimod has proven effective and safe for this patient. However, to ascertain its potential as a novel therapeutic option for acute NMOSD, larger-scale prospective clinical trials are required.

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies against the postsynaptic membrane proteins of the neuromuscular junction disrupt impulse transmission thus causing pathological muscle weakness and fatigue that worsens throughout the day. Although the disease is not yet curable, most patients can achieve complete symptom control and improved quality of life with appropriate treatment. Four treatment strategies are used in clinical practice: symptomatic, immunosuppressive, immunomodulatory, and surgical treatment, which can help control the disease but are not equally effective for all patients. Symptomatic treatment with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors is often not effective enough, so additional treatment with immunosuppressants is indicated. These are effective, but can cause systemic side effects if taken for long periods. Even polytherapy is often not sufficient enough to treat patients with myasthenia gravis. The challenges of treating this disease are encouraging to seek alternatives. Increasing attention is being paid to antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) and other structures of the neuromuscular junction that are important in pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis. Drugs are being developed that target specific links in the immune system to reduce the risk of systemic adverse effects. Currently, only two drugs are approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis – eculizumab and efgartigimod. Both of them are safe and effective in treating generalized myasthenia gravis with prevalent anti-AChR antibodies. Currently, 10 other drugs are clinically tested for their safety and efficacy in treating patients with myasthenia gravis. In this article, we review publications that analyze biological therapy and its novelty in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. We focus more on already approved biological drugs.

ObjectiveADAPT+ assessed the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod in adult participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).MethodsADAPT+ was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, up to 3-year extension of the pivotal phase 3 ADAPT study. Efgartigimod was administered in treatment cycles of 4 intravenous infusions (one 10 mg/kg infusion per week). Initiation of subsequent treatment cycles was individualized based on clinical evaluation. Safety endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events. Efficacy endpoints assessed disease severity using Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores.ResultsAs of January 2022, 151 participants had rolled over to ADAPT+ and 145 had received ≥1 dose of efgartigimod, of whom, 111 (76.6%) were AChR-Ab+ and 34 (23.4%) were AChR-Ab−. Mean study duration (treatment plus follow-up) was 548 days, and participants received up to 17 treatment cycles, corresponding to 217.6 participant-years of exposure. In the overall population, 123 (84.8%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were headache (36 [24.8%]), COVID-19 (22 [15.2%]), and nasopharyngitis (20 [13.8%]). Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was seen as early as 1 week following the first infusion across multiple cycles in AChR-Ab+ and AChR-Ab− participants. Maximal MG-ADL and QMG improvements aligned with onset and magnitude of total IgG and AChR-Ab reductions. For AChR-Ab+ participants at any time point in each of the first 10 treatment cycles, more than 90% had a maximum reduction of ≥2 points (CMI) in MG-ADL total score; across the 7 cycles in which QMG was measured, 69.4% to 91.3% of participants demonstrated a maximum reduction of ≥3 points (CMI) in QMG total score. Many participants demonstrated improvements well beyond CMI thresholds. In AChR-Ab+ participants with ≥1 year of combined follow-up between ADAPT and ADAPT+, mean number of annualized cycles was 4.7 per year (median [range] 5.0 [0.5–7.6]).ConclusionResults of ADAPT+ corroborate the substantial clinical improvements seen with efgartigimod in ADAPT and support its long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy, as well as an individualized dosing regimen for treatment of gMG.Clinical trial registrationhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03770403, NCT03770403.

Introduction/Aims: Multiple novel therapies have been approved for patients with myasthenia gravis. Our aim is to describe the early experience of efgartigimod use in acetylcholine receptor antibody‐positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients from five major neuromuscular centers who were treated with efgartigimod and had both pre‐ and post‐efgartigimod myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG‐ADL) scores. Information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG‐ADL and other MG‐specific measures, laboratory data, and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 37 patients (M:23, F:14) with a mean age of 65.56 (±14.74) y were included in this cohort. A total of 36/37 patients completed at least one cycle and 28 patients completed at least two cycles of efgartigimod. A total of 72% (26/36) of patients had a clinically meaningful reduction (≥2 point change) in MG‐ADL after the completion of the first cycle of efgartigimod (mean pre‐efgartigimod 8.02) (±3.09) versus post‐efgartigimod 4.33 (±3.62). Twenty‐five percent (9/36) achieved minimal symptom expression status after one cycle and 25% (7/28) after the second cycle. Treatment benefit was sustained after cycle 2. Three out of four patients with thymoma in this cohort had clinically significant reductions in MG‐ADL scores. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels decreased by about 60% (n = 10). One patient had a relapse of Clostridium difficile infection resulting in the discontinuation of therapy. Four patients had mild side effects. Discussion: Efgartigimod led to clinically meaningful improvement in MG‐ADL in diverse AChR+ve gMG patients but treatment frequency to achieve optimal symptom control needs to be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder affecting approximately 1 in 20 000 people. While most patients with ITP are successfully managed with the current set of standard and approved therapeutics, patients who cannot be adequately managed with these therapies, considered to have refractory ITP, are not uncommon. Therefore, there remains an ongoing need for novel therapeutics and drug development in ITP. Several agents exploiting novel targets and mechanisms in ITP are presently under clinical development, with trials primarily recruiting heavily pretreated patients and those with otherwise refractory disease. Such agents include the neonatal Fc receptor antagonist efgartigimod, the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor rilzabrutinib, the complement inhibitors sutimlimab and iptacopan and anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and mezagitamab, among others. Each of these agents exploits therapeutic targets or other aspects of ITP pathophysiology currently not targeted by the existing approved agents (thrombopoietin receptor agonists and fostamatinib). This manuscript offers an in‐depth review of the current available data for novel therapeutics in ITP presently undergoing phase 2 or 3 studies in patients with heavily pretreated or refractory ITP. It additionally highlights the future directions for drug development in refractory ITP, including discussion of innovative clinical trial designs, health‐related quality of life as an indispensable clinical trial end‐point and balancing potential toxicities of drugs with their potential benefits in a bleeding disorder in which few patients suffer life‐threatening bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A significant proportion of patients who survive coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) develop a constellation of life-altering symptoms that persist long after the initial infection has resolved. This post-COVID-19 syndrome may result from the development of autoreactive IgG antibodies that cause inflammation and tissue injury. In this commentary, we suggest that efgartigimod, a drug approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis, be tested for use in patients with post-COVID-19. Efgartigimod is a humanized IgG Fc fragment containing five point mutations that significantly increase affinity for the Fc region of the neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn). FcRn is involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases via the IgG recycling pathway because FcRN binds to autoreactive IgG antibodies and prevents the antibodies from being catabolized. Efgartigimod is a modified immunoglobulin that competitively displaces endogenous IgG from FcRn, thus increasing the level of unbound IgG, which is then catabolized and leads to decreased circulating levels of autoreactive as well as normal IgG. We suggest that efgartigimod be evaluated in a random, double-blind placebo-control trial in adults with post-COVID-19 for at least 2 months. If re-purposing this myasthenia gravis-approved drug for post - COVID-19 is successful, additional bioengineered FcRn antagonists should be tested for efficacy in patients with post-COVID-19.

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score. Results: Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period.