Search

Background: Microorganisms of tuberculosis (TB) are frequently difficult to identify from the airway specimen; therefore, lung biopsy for further histologic and microbiologic study is required. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy, but is rarely in the TB population. The purpose of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of EBUS-TBB with histologic study and tissue culture in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB. Methods: Patients who underwent EBUS-TBB with histologic study and TB tissue culture for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB from January 2016 to December 2018, were included. The accuracy of each diagnostic modality was calculated, respectively. Factors that might influence the positive rate of TB culture (washing fluid and tissue specimen) were also evaluated. Results: One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB, were enrolled, and 43 of them were finally diagnosed as having pulmonary TB. The sensitivity of washing fluid (a combination of smear, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for TB) and tissue specimen (a combination of pathology and tissue culture) via EBUS-TBB for TB diagnosis were 48.8 and 55.8%, respectively. The sensitivity for TB diagnosis would be elevated to 67.4% when both washing fluid and tissue specimens are used. The positive TB culture rate would not statistically increase with a combination of tissue specimens and washing fluid. Univariate analysis revealed that TB microorganisms would be more easily cultivated when lesions had an abscess or cavity on the computed tomography (CT) image (presence vs. absence; 62.5 vs. 26.3%, p = 0.022), heterogeneous echogenicity on the EBUS finding (heterogeneous vs. homogeneous; 93.3 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.001), or a necrotic pattern via histologic study (presence vs. absence; 70.6 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.013). Heterogeneous echogenicity in the EBUS finding was the independent predictor according to the results of multivariate analysis. None of our patients encountered major adverse events or received further intensive care after EBUS-TBB. Conclusion: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy is safe and effective for use in diagnosing sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB. EBUS echoic feature is also a predictor of the positive TB culture rate in pulmonary TB. However, tissue culture via EBUS-TBB has little effect in improving the positive TB culture rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB). However, ROSE by a cytopathologist or cytotechnologist is not always available during the procedure. The purposes of this study were to verify that a pulmonologist, after receiving training in cytology, could accurately assess an EBUS-TBB specimen on-site, and to evaluate the contribution of ROSE to EBUS-TBB. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) from January 2014 to June 2017 was performed. PPLs without a malignant diagnosis were excluded. The ROSE result determined by a pulmonologist was compared to the formal imprint cytologic report and pathologic report. The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBB was also compared between those with and without ROSE. Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients who underwent 336 EBUS-TBB procedures for PPL diagnosis and were found to have proven malignancy were enrolled. Eighty-six procedures were performed with ROSE. With the formal imprint cytologic diagnosis as the standard, ROSE had 96.9% sensitivity, 68.2% specificity, 89.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 88.2% negative predictive value (NPV), and 89.5% diagnostic accuracy. With the formal pathologic result as the standard, ROSE had 88.2% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 97.1% PPV, 47.1% NPV, and 87.2% diagnostic accuracy, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher when ROSE was performed during EBUS-TBB (88.4% vs 68.0%, P

BackgroundMicroorganisms of tuberculosis (TB) are frequently difficult to identify from the airway specimen; therefore, lung biopsy for further histologic and microbiologic study is required. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy, but is rarely in the TB population. The purpose of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of EBUS-TBB with histologic study and tissue culture in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB.MethodsPatients who underwent EBUS-TBB with histologic study and TB tissue culture for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB from January 2016 to December 2018, were included. The accuracy of each diagnostic modality was calculated, respectively. Factors that might influence the positive rate of TB culture (washing fluid and tissue specimen) were also evaluated.ResultsOne hundred sixty-one patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB, were enrolled, and 43 of them were finally diagnosed as having pulmonary TB. The sensitivity of washing fluid (a combination of smear, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for TB) and tissue specimen (a combination of pathology and tissue culture) via EBUS-TBB for TB diagnosis were 48.8 and 55.8%, respectively. The sensitivity for TB diagnosis would be elevated to 67.4% when both washing fluid and tissue specimens are used. The positive TB culture rate would not statistically increase with a combination of tissue specimens and washing fluid. Univariate analysis revealed that TB microorganisms would be more easily cultivated when lesions had an abscess or cavity on the computed tomography (CT) image (presence vs. absence; 62.5 vs. 26.3%, p = 0.022), heterogeneous echogenicity on the EBUS finding (heterogeneous vs. homogeneous; 93.3 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.001), or a necrotic pattern via histologic study (presence vs. absence; 70.6 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.013). Heterogeneous echogenicity in the EBUS finding was the independent predictor according to the results of multivariate analysis. None of our patients encountered major adverse events or received further intensive care after EBUS-TBB.ConclusionEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy is safe and effective for use in diagnosing sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB. EBUS echoic feature is also a predictor of the positive TB culture rate in pulmonary TB. However, tissue culture via EBUS-TBB has little effect in improving the positive TB culture rate.

Background/purpose: Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB). However, ROSE by a cytopathologist or cytotechnologist is not always available during the procedure. The purposes of this study were to verify that a pulmonologist, after receiving training in cytology, could accurately assess an EBUS-TBB specimen on-site, and to evaluate the contribution of ROSE to EBUS-TBB.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) from January 2014 to June 2017 was performed. PPLs without a malignant diagnosis were excluded. The ROSE result determined by a pulmonologist was compared to the formal imprint cytologic report and pathologic report. The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBB was also compared between those with and without ROSE.Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients who underwent 336 EBUS-TBB procedures for PPL diagnosis and were found to have proven malignancy were enrolled. Eighty-six procedures were performed with ROSE. With the formal imprint cytologic diagnosis as the standard, ROSE had 96.9% sensitivity, 68.2% specificity, 89.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 88.2% negative predictive value (NPV), and 89.5% diagnostic accuracy. With the formal pathologic result as the standard, ROSE had 88.2% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 97.1% PPV, 47.1% NPV, and 87.2% diagnostic accuracy, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher when ROSE was performed during EBUS-TBB (88.4% vs 68.0%, P < 0.001).Conclusion: A trained pulmonologist can interpret adequately cytologic smears on-site and effectively improve the accuracy of EBUS-TBB in the diagnosis of PPLs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), but the diagnostic yield is not adequate. Cone-beam computed tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) can be utilized to assess the location of PPLs and biopsy devices, and has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopic techniques. The purpose of this study was to verify the contribution of CBCT-AF to EBUS-TBB. Methods: Patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of PPLs were enrolled. The navigation success rate and diagnostic yield were used to evaluate the effectiveness of CBCT-AF in EBUS-TBB. Results: In this study, 236 patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for PPL diagnosis were enrolled. One hundred fifteen patients were in CBCT-AF group and 121 were in non-AF group. The navigation success rate was significantly higher in the CBCT-AF group (96.5% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.006). The diagnostic yield was even better in the CBCT-AF group when the target lesion was small in size (68.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.026 for lesions ≤10 mm and 77.5% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.016 for lesions 10–20 mm, respectively). The diagnostic yield of the two study groups became similar when the procedures with a failure of navigation were excluded. The procedure-related complication rate was similar between the two study groups. Conclusion: CBCT-AF is safe, and effectively enhances the navigation success rate, thereby increasing the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBB for PPLs.

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), but the diagnostic yield is not adequate. Cone-beam computed tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) can be utilized to assess the location of PPLs and biopsy devices, and has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopic techniques. The purpose of this study was to verify the contribution of CBCT-AF to EBUS-TBB. Methods: Patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of PPLs were enrolled. The navigation success rate and diagnostic yield were used to evaluate the effectiveness of CBCT-AF in EBUS-TBB. Results: In this study, 236 patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for PPL diagnosis were enrolled. One hundred fifteen patients were in CBCT-AF group and 121 were in non-AF group. The navigation success rate was significantly higher in the CBCT-AF group (96.5% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.006). The diagnostic yield was even better in the CBCT-AF group when the target lesion was small in size (68.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.026 for lesions ≤10 mm and 77.5% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.016 for lesions 10–20 mm, respectively). The diagnostic yield of the two study groups became similar when the procedures with a failure of navigation were excluded. The procedure-related complication rate was similar between the two study groups. Conclusion: CBCT-AF is safe, and effectively enhances the navigation success rate, thereby increasing the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBB for PPLs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is widely used for diagnosing lung cancers; however, the diagnostic yield varies widely. This study aimed to assess the efficiency of EBUS-GS., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the results of 110 patients who underwent transbronchial biopsy (TBB) for diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer. Bronchoscopy with and without EBUS-GS was performed in 60 (group A) and 50 patients (group B), respectively; their medical records were examined, and results from the two groups were compared by using the unpaired Student t-test., Results: The diagnostic sensitivity for lung cancer was 83.3% in group A and 68% in group B (P=0.066) while using at least one of the following procedures: TBB, cytological brushing, and bronchial washing. The diagnostic sensitivity for lesions ≥20mm was 86.4% in group A and 76.7% in group B (P=0.263). Moreover, the diagnostic sensitivity for lesions 10-20mm was 60% in group A and 14.2% in group B (P=0.0004); the diagnostic sensitivity with TBB alone was 63.3% in group A and 44% in group B (P=0.043). The diagnostic sensitivity with TBB alone for lesions ≥20mm was 70.2% in group A and 44.8% in group B (P=0.051). Moreover, the diagnostic sensitivity for lesions 10-20mm in size was 45% in group A and 14.2% in group B with TBB alone (P=0.115)., Conclusion: EBUS-GS with TBB, brushing, and bronchial washing is effective in diagnosing lung cancers sized <20mm., (Copyright © 2014 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)