Search

Biologics targeting the molecules associated with type 2 inflammation have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases including chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis, eosinophilic bronchitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis share clinical features with eosinophilic asthma and CRPwNP, which are mostly adult-onset and may develop simultaneously or consecutively. These eosinophilic airway/lung diseases respond well to initial treatment with systemic corticosteroids, but often recur when the corticosteroids are tapered. The management of these “refractory” cases is an unmet need for clinicians. We first reviewed the standard treatments for these chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases, followed by the definition and prevalence of refractory diseases and the role of biologics in their management. The available evidence varies from case reports and case series to randomized control trials, depending on the type of disease; however, these studies provide not only a direction for clinical practice, but also insights into the pathophysiology of each disease. Physicians should discuss the efficacy and costs of biologics in patients with refractory eosinophilic airway/lung diseases to minimize not only the current symptoms, but future risks as well.

Biologics targeting the molecules associated with type 2 inflammation have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases including chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis, eosinophilic bronchitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis share clinical features with eosinophilic asthma and CRPwNP, which are mostly adult-onset and may develop simultaneously or consecutively. These eosinophilic airway/lung diseases respond well to initial treatment with systemic corticosteroids, but often recur when the corticosteroids are tapered. The management of these "refractory" cases is an unmet need for clinicians. We first reviewed the standard treatments for these chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases, followed by the definition and prevalence of refractory diseases and the role of biologics in their management. The available evidence varies from case reports and case series to randomized control trials, depending on the type of disease; however, these studies provide not only a direction for clinical practice, but also insights into the pathophysiology of each disease. Physicians should discuss the efficacy and costs of biologics in patients with refractory eosinophilic airway/lung diseases to minimize not only the current symptoms, but future risks as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eosinophilic bronchiolitis is a disease concept reported in Japan in 2001, that presents with bronchiolitis accompanied by eosinophilia in the blood and lungs. In 2013, hypereosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis, as a group of disease presenting with eosinophilic bronchiolitis, was proposed in France. The relationship between eosinophilic bronchiolitis and other eosinophil-related diseases has not been clarified. Herein, we report the case of a 56-year-old female patient with eosinophilic bronchiolitis without asthma, which developed into eosinophilic pneumonia. Treatment with oral prednisone improved the respiratory function. According to the clinicopathological findings in this case, eosinophilic bronchiolitis may be a different disease from asthma.

Eosinophilic bronchiolitis is a rare allergic disorder caused by eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchioles of the lungs. An effective treatment strategy is needed in cases resistant to steroids. However, its pathophysiology remains unclear owing to the limited number of cases. We herein present the case of a 31-year-old man who experienced eosinophilic bronchiolitis with eosinophil ETosis (EETosis) in the mucus plugs. The patient was diagnosed with asthma. His respiratory symptoms worsened with eosinophilia when treated with the standard asthma regimen, including inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonist, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and leukotriene receptor antagonist. Chest computed tomography revealed bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules in the lower lobes of both lungs. Bronchoscopy showed obstruction of the subsegmental bronchus with mucus plugs. Histological analysis demonstrated abundant eosinophils in the mucus plugs. Cytolytic eosinophils together with Charcot–Leyden crystal formations and deposition of major basic proteins were also observed, indicating the occurrence of EETosis. Introduction of benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α antibody, successfully controlled the patient's condition and reduced the amount of systemic corticosteroids administered. Our findings confirm that this antibody strongly decreases airway eosinophils in patients with severe asthma. Thus, benralizumab might be an optimal therapeutic agent for the treatment of mucus plug-forming and/or EETosis-occurring eosinophilic lung diseases, including eosinophilic bronchiolitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eosinophilic bronchiolitis is a rare allergic disorder caused by eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchioles of the lungs. An effective treatment strategy is needed in cases resistant to steroids. However, its pathophysiology remains unclear owing to the limited number of cases. We herein present the case of a 31-year-old man who experienced eosinophilic bronchiolitis with eosinophil ETosis (EETosis) in the mucus plugs. The patient was diagnosed with asthma. His respiratory symptoms worsened with eosinophilia when treated with the standard asthma regimen, including inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonist, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and leukotriene receptor antagonist. Chest computed tomography revealed bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules in the lower lobes of both lungs. Bronchoscopy showed obstruction of the subsegmental bronchus with mucus plugs. Histological analysis demonstrated abundant eosinophils in the mucus plugs. Cytolytic eosinophils together with Charcot–Leyden crystal formations and deposition of major basic proteins were also observed, indicating the occurrence of EETosis. Introduction of benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α antibody, successfully controlled the patient’s condition and reduced the amount of systemic corticosteroids administered. Our findings confirm that this antibody strongly decreases airway eosinophils in patients with severe asthma. Thus, benralizumab might be an optimal therapeutic agent for the treatment of mucus plug-forming and/or EETosis-occurring eosinophilic lung diseases, including eosinophilic bronchiolitis.

Eosinophilic bronchiolitis is a disease concept reported in Japan in 2001, that presents with bronchiolitis accompanied by eosinophilia in the blood and lungs. In 2013, hypereosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis, as a group of disease presenting with eosinophilic bronchiolitis, was proposed in France. The relationship between eosinophilic bronchiolitis and other eosinophil-related diseases has not been clarified. Herein, we report the case of a 56-year-old female patient with eosinophilic bronchiolitis without asthma, which developed into eosinophilic pneumonia. Treatment with oral prednisone improved the respiratory function. According to the clinicopathological findings in this case, eosinophilic bronchiolitis may be a different disease from asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the fact that bronchioles are involved in asthma, there have been limited asthmatic cases showing marked centrilobular opacities on computed tomography (CT) chest scans. Systemic corticosteroids have been administered in such cases, but the efficacy of extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids has not been assessed. Case Summary: A previously healthy 64-year-old man presented with a four-month history of productive cough and progressive dyspnea despite a combination therapy with inhaled salmeterol (50 μg bid) and fluticasone (500 μg bid), sustained-release theophylline, and pranlukast because of suspicion of asthma. Physical examination revealed wheezing at the end of forced expiration. High resolution CT chest scan showed diffuse centrilobular opacities, bronchiectatic changes, and bronchial wall thickening. Transbronchial lung biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and transbronchial biopsy all showed predominant eosinophil infiltrates, suggesting that eosinophilic inflammation across the entire airway tree caused the abnormal CT findings. Alveolar fraction of exhaled nitric oxide level, a non-invasive marker of eosinophilic peripheral airway inflammation, was also elevated. Because he refused systemic corticosteroids, inhaled ciclesonide (400 μg bid) and inhaled tiotropium were added on to his current medication under careful observation. His symptoms, pulmonary function and CT findings promptly improved, and he had fully recovered at follow-up. Discussion: Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids could be an alternative approach in centrilobular opacities caused by eosinophilic peripheral airway inflammation.

A 56-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of dyspnea, wheezing, and a productive cough. Eight years before presentation, bronchial asthma was diagnosed and the patient received inhaled corticosteroids plus antiasthmatic agents (a long-acting inhaled p2-agonist, leukotriene modifiers, and theophylline). Chest radiography showed small diffuse nodular shadows, and a computed tomographic scan showed thickening of the bronchi and bronchioles, with diffuse centrilobular nodules in both lung fields. A blood test and microscopic examination of the bronchoalveolar fluid revealed marked eosinophilia. Transbronchial lung biopsy and transbronchial biopsy showed eosinophilic bronchitis and bronchiolitis. After treatment with oral prednisolone (40 mg daily) and inhaled corticosteroids, the symptoms, blood eosinophilia, and radiographic findings improved. Recently, several similar cases of eosinophilic bronchiolitis have been reported. Studies of further cases and elucidation of the pathophysiology of eosinophilic bronchiolitis are necessary to establish a concept for this disease and to determine whether it should be classified as a subtype of bronchial asthma or as a distinct entity.

A 56-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of dyspnea, wheezing, and a productive cough. Eight years before presentation, bronchial asthma was diagnosed and the patient received inhaled corticosteroids plus antiasthmatic agents (a long-acting inhaled β2-agonist, leukotriene modifiers, and theophylline). Chest radiography showed small diffuse nodular shadows, and a computed tomographic scan showed thickening of the bronchi and bronchioles, with diffuse centrilobular nodules in both lung fields. A blood test and microscopic examination of the bronchoalveolar fluid revealed marked eosinophilia. Transbronchial lung biopsy and transbronchial biopsy showed eosinophilic bronchitis and bronchiolitis. After treatment with oral prednisolone (40 mg daily) and inhaled corticosteroids, the symptoms, blood eosinophilia, and radiographic findings improved. Recently, several similar cases of eosinophilic bronchiolitis have been reported. Studies of further cases and elucidation of the pathophysiology of eosinophilic bronchiolitis are necessary to establish a concept for this disease and to determine whether it should be classified as a subtype of bronchial asthma or as a distinct entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 60‐year‐old female with severe bronchial asthma developed persistent dyspnoea and an abnormal lung shadow. High‐resolution computed tomography (HRCT) demonstrated patchy ground‐glass opacities and diffuse, small nodular shadows. Elevated percentages of eosinophils were observed in the blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. These results collectively indicated that her asthma was accompanied by eosinophilic pneumonia and eosinophilic bronchiolitis. Although previous, rare case reports suggest that systemic steroid therapy is necessary and effective for the control of eosinophilic bronchiolitis, we chose to treat her with an anti‐interleukin 5 antibody, mepolizumab. Her asthma, eosinophilic pneumonia, and eosinophilic bronchiolitis each improved in response to mepolizumab as assessed from her symptoms, pulmonary function tests, and HRCT. Mepolizumab might be effective not only for asthma and eosinophilic pneumonia but also for eosinophilic bronchiolitis. There have been a few case reports of eosinophilic bronchiolitis that is characterized by radiographic findings showing diffuse bronchiolitis plus massive accumulation of eosinophils in the airways. Systemic steroid therapy has been suggested to be effective for this disorder, although the precise pathogenesis in unknown. Here, we report a case of severe asthma complicated with eosinophilic pneumonia and eosinophilic bronchiolitis, all of which were alleviated by anti‐interleukin 5 (IL‐5) antibody. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]