Search

Cieľom tejto bakalárskej práce je analyzovať príčiny doterajšej neúčasti Veľkej Británie v eurozóne. Eurozóna, ako jeden z výsledkov európskeho integračného procesu, spojuje krajiny, ktoré sa vzdali svojej menovej politiky a prijali spoločnú menu – euro. Veľká Británia, aj keď sa aktívne zapájala do jednotlivých etáp vytvárania menovej únie, neprijala spoločnú menu a práve to na ňu vrhá zlý tieň a je vnímaná ako krajina euroskeptikov. Celá práca je rozdelená do nasledujúcich kapitol: Úvod, Teória menovej integrácie, Európska menová integrácia, Menová politika Spojeného kráľovstva Veľkej Británie a Severného Írska, Analýza nákladov a prínosov členstva Spojeného kráľovstva Veľkej Británie a Severného Írska v eurozóne a Záver. Práve kapitola Analýza nákladov a prínosov členstva Spojeného kráľovstva Veľkej Británie a Severného Írska v eurozóne sa zaoberá dôvodmi neúčasti VB v eurozóne, a aké náklady a prínosy z toho krajina má., The aim of this Bachelor Thesis is to analyze why The United Kingdom doesn’t participate in the euro area. The Euro Area, as a result of the European integration process, brings together countries that have renounced their monetary policy and adopt a common currency – the Euro. United Kingdom, even if it is actively involved in various stages of creation of monetary union, hasn’t adopted a common currency and it can cause that it is perceive as a country of Euroskeptics. This work id divided into the following chapters: Introduction, Theory of Monetary integration, European monetary integration, Monetary policy of the UK, Cost – Benefit Analysis of the UK Membership in the Euro Area and the Conclusion. The most important chapter is Cost – Benefit Analysis of the UK Membership in the Euro Area where is analyze the reasons for non – participation in the Euro Area.

The author focuses on specific political factors that influenced the creation of II Imperial Coinage Order of 1551. Every effort was made to reform and unify of coinage situation in the frame of the Holy Roman Empire (the Reich). Emperor Charles V started it in the times of his predominance between his victory in so called Schmalcaldic war in 1547, and a new military resistance of imperial opposition in 1552. Analysing the process of making of the new imperial currency in 1549-1551, the author comes to the conclusion that the final form of II Imperial Coinage Order was strongly influenced by the interests of the emperor himself. In the previous decades, Charles V supported coinage integration of the Reich in the form used by his younger brother Ferdinand I in his hereditary Austrian lands. However, during the 1540s the emperor gained his own and very important silver mines in the oversea colonies. That´s why his own interests in the Reich turned the scale of the long-termed development and why II Imperial Coinage Order was inconvenient for the Austrian lands. The author judges the final form of II Imperial Coinage Order as a result of the Charles´ policy to integrate the Spanish and imperial coinage systems. It would be much easier for the emperor to apply the oversea silver (they transported so called ship coins, then it was again monetarized for European trade in the Spanish Netherlands or in Naples). Charles V was, however, shortly defeated by the imperial opposition, after 1555 he lived in seclusion and his project failed. Finally, it was replaced by III Imperial Coinage Order in 1559, based on the Austrian coinage system.