Search

Combining Gen Z and millennial employee groups, the current study aims to explore the mechanism of felt responsibility for constructive change, taking charge and innovation performance based on the theory of planned behavior and proactive motivation model, and analyzes the moderating effect of creative self-efficacy in it. The results reveal a positive association between felt responsibility for constructive change and taking charge, as well as between taking charge and innovation performance, with taking charge acting as a complete mediator. Moreover, the level of creative self-efficacy influences the relationship between felt responsibility for constructive change, taking charge, and innovation performance. Specifically, employees with high levels of creative self-efficacy demonstrate an accelerated transition from felt responsibility for constructive change to taking charge, thus enhancing innovation performance. Conversely, employees with low levels of creative self-efficacy experience a hindered transformation process from felt responsibility for constructive change to taking charge. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of responsibility awareness in fostering innovation performance, and provide theoretical and practical enlightenment for managers to effectively cultivate employees' consciousness of responsibility for constructive change, promote active engagement in taking charge and improve innovation performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Honghao Hu,1,2 Yuechao Du,1,2 Zhongming Wang1,2 1School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Global Entrepreneurship Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yuechao Du, Email ycdu@zju.edu.cnIntroduction: In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, innovation has become a crucial factor for the success of entrepreneurial ventures in China. However, the mechanisms underlying the promotion of innovation by entrepreneurs are not yet fully understood. Drawing on self-determination theory, this study develops a comprehensive “motivation-behaviors-performance” model to examine the relationship between entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change and ventures’ innovation performance.Methods: Two waves of questionnaire surveys with a sample of 376 entrepreneurs in East China were conducted. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to test the hypotheses.Results: The empirical findings demonstrate that entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change is a key driver of innovation performance in ventures. Furthermore, external learning, encompassing technological and market learning, serves as a mediator for the positive link between entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility and innovation performance. The study also reveals that entrepreneurs’ perception of shared vision moderates the relationships between entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility and both technological and market learning, such that the relationships are stronger when the perception of shared vision is higher.Discussion: These results yield important contributions to the entrepreneurial psychology research and self-determination theory. The study also has managerial implications for entrepreneurs aiming to enhance ventures’ innovation performance.Keywords: entrepreneur, felt responsibility for constructive change, innovation performance, technological learning, market learning, shared vision

This study aims to explore the mediating mechanisms between organizational compassion and employee innovative behavior by introducing perceived insider status and felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) as mediating variables. Drawing on cognitive-affective personality system theory, a cross-level mediation model was established. Data were collected via the online-based questionnaire from 420 employees of 12 enterprises in China. Multilevel path modeling was leveraged to examine hypotheses proposed in this study. The results indicate that FRCC mediates the relationship between organizational compassion and employee innovative behavior. Moreover, perceived insider status and FRCC serially mediate the relationship between organizational compassion and employee innovative behavior. This study has significant theoretical and practical implications as it is the first study to investigate the value of organizational compassion to employee innovative behavior at the workplace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to explore the linking mechanisms underlying the relationship between leader proactivity and follower proactivity. Drawing on social learning theory, the present research investigates the effects of leader proactivity on follower proactivity by developing a chain mediation model. An analysis of three-wave lagged data (N = 575) on 575 employees of six firms in China shows that leader proactivity is positively related to follower proactivity and that employees' role breadth self-efficacy (RBSE) and felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) mediate this relationship. The analytical results also show that leader proactivity facilitates follower value congruence, which in turn enhances followers' RBSE and FRCC and ultimately promotes followers' proactivity. The results extend the current proactivity literature and fill the research gap by investigating the relationship between leader proactivity and follower proactivity. The current study also contributes to the literature by identifying the mediating mechanism of the "can do" and "reason to" mechanisms that link leader proactivity to follower proactivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to explore the linking mechanisms underlying the relationship between leader proactivity and follower proactivity. Drawing on social learning theory, the present research investigates the effects of leader proactivity on follower proactivity by developing a chain mediation model. An analysis of three-wave lagged data (N = 575) on 575 employees of six firms in China shows that leader proactivity is positively related to follower proactivity and that employees’ role breadth self-efficacy (RBSE) and felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) mediate this relationship. The analytical results also show that leader proactivity facilitates follower value congruence, which in turn enhances followers’ RBSE and FRCC and ultimately promotes followers’ proactivity. The results extend the current proactivity literature and fill the research gap by investigating the relationship between leader proactivity and follower proactivity. The current study also contributes to the literature by identifying the mediating mechanism of the “can do” and “reason to” mechanisms that link leader proactivity to follower proactivity.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations need to effectively manage changes, and employees need to proactively adapt to these changes. The present research investigated when and how individual employees’ narcissism was related to their change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Specifically, based on a trait activation perspective, this research proposed the hypotheses that individual employees’ narcissism and environmental uncertainty would interactively influence employees’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior via felt responsibility for constructive change; furthermore, the effect of narcissism on change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior via felt responsibility for constructive change would be stronger when the environmental uncertainty prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic was high rather than low. Two studies were conducted to test these hypotheses: an online survey of 180 employees in mainland China (Study 1) and a field study of 167 leader–follower dyads at two Chinese companies (Study 2). The current research reveals a bright side of narcissism, which has typically been recognized as a dark personality trait, and enriches the understanding of the antecedents of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. This research can also guide organizations that wish to stimulate employee proactivity.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations need to effectively manage changes, and employees need to proactively adapt to these changes. The present research investigated when and how individual employees' narcissism was related to their change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Specifically, based on a trait activation perspective, this research proposed the hypotheses that individual employees' narcissism and environmental uncertainty would interactively influence employees' change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior via felt responsibility for constructive change; furthermore, the effect of narcissism on change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior via felt responsibility for constructive change would be stronger when the environmental uncertainty prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic was high rather than low. Two studies were conducted to test these hypotheses: an online survey of 180 employees in mainland China (Study 1) and a field study of 167 leader–follower dyads at two Chinese companies (Study 2). The current research reveals a bright side of narcissism, which has typically been recognized as a dark personality trait, and enriches the understanding of the antecedents of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. This research can also guide organizations that wish to stimulate employee proactivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing on self-determination theory, we examine the mechanism through which entrepreneurs' felt responsibility for constructive change affects entrepreneurial performance and how market orientation affects the influencing mechanism. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 424 entrepreneurs in China. The results show that entrepreneurs' felt responsibility for constructive change is positively related to technology action and entrepreneurial performance, and technology action mediates the relationship between entrepreneurs' felt responsibility for constructive change and entrepreneurial performance. In addition, market orientation moderates the relationship between technology action and entrepreneurial performance such that the relationship is stronger when the market orientation is higher. Our findings suggest that when entrepreneur feel responsible for constructive change, they tend to take technology actions to achieve their goals and improve the long-term development of ventures. It is also important for entrepreneurs to hold a market orientation, which helps them be aware of changes in customer needs rather than blindly focusing on the use of the latest technologies. Our study is pioneering in exploring entrepreneurs' felt responsibility for constructive change in the entrepreneurial context, advancing the research on entrepreneurship psychology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing on self-determination theory, we examine the mechanism through which entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change affects entrepreneurial performance and how market orientation affects the influencing mechanism. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 424 entrepreneurs in China. The results show that entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change is positively related to technology action and entrepreneurial performance, and technology action mediates the relationship between entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change and entrepreneurial performance. In addition, market orientation moderates the relationship between technology action and entrepreneurial performance such that the relationship is stronger when the market orientation is higher. Our findings suggest that when entrepreneur feel responsible for constructive change, they tend to take technology actions to achieve their goals and improve the long-term development of ventures. It is also important for entrepreneurs to hold a market orientation, which helps them be aware of changes in customer needs rather than blindly focusing on the use of the latest technologies. Our study is pioneering in exploring entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change in the entrepreneurial context, advancing the research on entrepreneurship psychology.

In this study, we define customer voice behavior as a consumer’s extra-role communicative behavior of offering suggestions or opinions to enterprises. We classified customer voice behavior into two dimensions: promotive and prohibitive voices. Furthermore, we explored the relationship between customer–company (C–C) identification and customer voice behavior. From a sample of 394 university students who were customers of food delivery services, the results showed that C–C identification was positively related to both promotive and prohibitive voices while felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) played a mediating role between C–C identification and both kinds of customer voice behavior. In addition, we found the moderating effects of self-impact, which could strengthen the impacts of FRCC on customer voice behavior and the mediating effects of FRCC. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are also discussed.

Copyright of Commerce & Management Quarterly is the property of Chinese Association of Business & Management Technology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this study, we define customer voice behavior as a consumer's extra-role communicative behavior of offering suggestions or opinions to enterprises. We classified customer voice behavior into two dimensions: promotive and prohibitive voices. Furthermore, we explored the relationship between customer–company (C–C) identification and customer voice behavior. From a sample of 394 university students who were customers of food delivery services, the results showed that C–C identification was positively related to both promotive and prohibitive voices while felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) played a mediating role between C–C identification and both kinds of customer voice behavior. In addition, we found the moderating effects of self-impact, which could strengthen the impacts of FRCC on customer voice behavior and the mediating effects of FRCC. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our study contributes to research exploring the differential antecedents of employee promotive and prohibitive voice. We first examined the mediating role of employee felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC) in the positive relationship between servant leadership and their prohibitive and promotive voice. We then tested the differential moderating effects of employee dispositional avoidance-approach orientation, where the indirect effect of servant leadership on prohibitive voice is weakened for the high avoidance-motivated, and the indirect effect of servant leadership on promotive voice is weakened for the high approach-motivated. To test our hypotheses, multi-source data were collected from 231 supervisor-supervisee dyads working in a range of companies and sectors in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As predicted, employee FRCC mediates the positive relationship between servant leadership and prohibitive voice and these indirect effects are significantly weaker for the high avoidance-motivated. We did not observe the predicted weakening effects of high approach-motivation on the indirect relationship between servant leadership and promotive voice. It seems servant leaders may be less influential for those avoidance-motivated individuals already predisposed to enact prohibitive forms of voice, such as voicing concerns about harmful organizational processes and practices. Implications for social exchange and role theories, and managerial practice, are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The research questions posed in this study highlight the importance of valuing proactivity in both prompting an individual to engage in proactive behavior and encouraging the expression of that behavior. We integrate a variety of constructs from the proactivity literature to gain a deeper understanding of proactive behavior as it relates to proactive motivation and supervisory performance evaluations. First, we draw upon self-determination theory, expectancy-value theory, and the recent integration of the proactive motivation literature to hypothesize that proactive behavior is predicted by the interaction of 'can do' and 'reason to' proactive motivational states. Second, on the basis of performance theory, we hypothesize that the relationship between proactive behavior and performance depends upon the extent to which the supervisor values proactivity. Specifically, we argue that supervisors with proactive personalities are more likely to value and reward subordinate proactive behavior than passive supervisors. Results provide support for both of our hypotheses. Interestingly, results show that proactive behavior did not result in negative consequences but rather that there was a cost (i.e., lower performance rating) for not taking charge for employees with proactive supervisors. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]