Search

Background: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of the Chinese health service system. Methods: A partitioned survival model was constructed to simulate quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a patient's lifetime based on a phase III clinical trial. Results: Sintilimab plus chemotherapy increased by 0.316 QALY and 0.285 QALY with the additional cost of $5692 and $5269, which led to the ICER of $18000/QALY and $18519/QALY gained in the overall population and the patients with CPS ≥ 10, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab may be a cost-effective first-line treatment choice for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several head-to-head meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (M+) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation encompassing multiple treatment strategies. Our objective is to conduct a network meta-analysis that includes various treatment modalities, enabling both direct and indirect comparisons for a more thorough assessment. Methods: We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Stata 15.0 and R 4.3.2 software were utilized for the network meta-analysis. Results: A total of 30 RCTs, comprising 8654 participants, were included. The study encompassed the following 19 treatments: Chemotherapy; Afatinib; Afatinib + Cetuximab; Apatinib + Gefitinib; Befotertinib; Cetuximab + Chemotherapy; Erlotinib; Erlotinib + Bevacizumab; Erlotinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib; Gefitinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib + Olaparib; Icotinib; Icotinib + Chemotherapy; Lazertinib; Naquotinib; Osimertinib; Osimertinib + Bevacizumab; Osimertinib + Chemotherapy. The network meta-analysis results indicated that, in terms of PFS, Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) were the most effective. Regarding OS, Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) emerged as the top three options. Afatinib (SUCRAs: 92.27%) was associated with the best ORR improvement. For ≥3AEs, Afatinib (SUCRAs: 74.93%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 69.42%) were likely the best choices. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that, considering both survival and safety, Osimertinib stands out as the preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M + advanced or metastatic nsq-NSCLC. Notably, the combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy demonstrated superior survival benefits. However, due to the limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions await further validation through more high-quality research. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display%5frecord.php?ID=CRD42024562981 , identifier CRD42024562981. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ORIENT-15 double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resulted in better clinical outcomes. In this analysis, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC from a healthcare system perspective in China. Methods: A partitioned survival model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy alone with sintilimab for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC patients. Clinical data were obtained from the ORIENT-15 trial and extrapolated to 10 years. Health state utilities and costs were sourced from the literature and from public healthcare institutions. The primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Two different sensitivity analyses, one-way and probabilistic, were performed to assess model uncertainty. Results: Sintilimab-based chemotherapy was more costly ($31699.21 vs. $20687.42) and more effective (0.74 vs. 0.53) than placebo-based chemotherapy, resulting in an ICER of $51908.19 /QALY, which is greater than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China ($38223/QALY). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the PFS and cost of sintilimab were the major influencing factors affecting the results. Conclusions: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic OSCC, sintilimab chemotherapy could improve survival time and health benefits compared with traditional chemotherapy, but the present analysis suggests that sintilimab is not a cost-effective treatment option in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effectiveness and feasibility in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. Methods: This retrospective study included 57 patients with NSCLC (52 men and 5 women), aged ≥ 75 years (range: 75–86) who received first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy from December 2020 to November 2022 at four institutes in Japan. Patient characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE) were assessed. Results: The overall response rate was 42.1%, the disease control rate was 73.6%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months. Common Grade ≥ 3 AEs included pneumonitis, elevated aspartate transaminase, elevated alanine transaminase, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. No treatment-related deaths were reported. PFS and OS were longer in patients who experienced treatment-related AEs. Patients with and without AEs had a median PFS of 11.7 and 2.8 months, respectively. Similarly, the median OS of patients with and without AEs was 20.4 and 9.0 months, respectively. Conclusion: First-line Nivo-Ipi therapy is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC. Although there was an increased incidence of pneumonitis, the treatment was manageable and presented as a viable treatment option. Notably, the occurrence of treatment-related AEs was associated with improved clinical outcomes, suggesting a potential prognostic value of AEs in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To explore trajectories of 12-week adherence to a digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), associations with baseline characteristics, and trajectories of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) up to 1-year follow-up. t DESIGN: Retrospective cohort (registry) study. METHODS: Weekly data on adherence (ie, the percentage of completed activities [exercises, lessons, and quizzes]) were obtained over 12 weeks (n = 14 097). Longitudinal k-means clustering was used to identify adherence trajectory clusters. Associations of baseline characteristics with adherence trajectory clusters were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Trajectories of each PROM (pain, function, and general health) from baseline up to 1-year follow-up (measured at 3-month intervals) across adherence trajectory clusters were explored using generalized estimating equations adjusted for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Four adherence trajectory clusters were identified: "high-persistent" (68.0%), "high-declining" (16.6%), "moderate-increasing" (8.5%), and "moderate-declining" (6.9%). Multinomial logistic regression suggested that female sex, older age, lower body mass index, lower education, living outside metropolitan cities, higher level of physical activity, less anxiety/depression, no fear of movement, having walking difficulties, and higher readiness to do exercise were associated with a higher probability of assignment to "high-persistent" than other clusters. Beliefs/perceptions and sociodemographic factors accounted for most of the explained variation in adherence trajectory clusters. While "high-persistent" cluster generally reported better outcomes than other clusters, these differences were small. CONCLUSION: While there were variations in adherence to the digital treatment, participants reported clinically comparable PROMs regardless of their adherence trajectory cluster. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent phase III randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve prognosis in advanced HER-2-negative gastric cancer patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) higher than 5. However, these findings are not confirmed in real-world settings, and the benefits in PD-L1 CPS < 5 patients remain controversial. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, data from across thirteen medical centers were analyzed by inverse probability of treatment weighting for matching, alongside univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard regression models. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses were conducted to identify efficacy prognostic models and resistance mechanisms. Results: This study included 573 patients with advanced gastric cancer, 265 treated with chemotherapy and 308 with ICIs plus chemotherapy. In the overall cohort and HER-2-negative patients, the combination therapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival, without marked increases in severe adverse events. Notably, patients with PD-L1 CPS 1–4 showed significant overall survival prolongation and a trend towards improved progression-free survival with combination therapy. Patients with unknown PD-L1 status also benefitted from ICIs. SMARCA4 and BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with responses, while CCNE1 and ZFHX3 alternation, alongside high "ABC transporters" signatures, were more common in non-responsive patients. A novel risk model, PGFIC, outperformed traditional biomarkers in predicting treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Adding ICIs to first-line treatment significantly prolongs survival in overall patients and in those with PD-L1 CPS 1–4 or unknown. This study also provides valuable insights into prognostic markers and resistance mechanisms, potentially guiding immunotherapy strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have indicated that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can prolong the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, it remains unclear whether the presence of liver metastasis leads to systemic immune suppression, resulting in poorer immune therapy outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether liver metastasis affects the efficacy of ICI in first-line treatment for AGC patients. Methods: The data of AGC patients undergoing combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2018 to January 2023 were collected. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were employed to analyze the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients. Results: A total of 162 patients with AGC who were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her 2) negative and treated with immunotherapy in the first line were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups, the liver metastasis group (LM group, n = 40) and the group without liver metastasis (NLM group, n = 122) according to the presence of liver metastasis. The results of the present study indicate that there was no statistically significant difference in the median OS, with median OS of 17 and 15 months, respectively (p = 0.29). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the median PFS between the two groups (p = 0.65). Conclusion: This study suggests that the presence or absence of liver metastasis does not significantly affect the prognosis of AGC patients receiving first-line treatment with ICI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Extensive small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) are currently managed using first‐line chemotherapy options, including atezolizumab (Atezo) plus etoposide and carboplatin (CE) or durvalumab (Durva) plus etoposide with either cisplatin (PE) or carboplatin (CE). However, a definitive distinction in therapeutic effects between Atezo and Durva in these regimens remains unestablished. Methods: We analyzed data from 100 patients diagnosed with ES‐SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first‐line chemotherapy. Among them, 70 were administered Atezo + CE, 12 received Durva + PE, and 18 received Durva + CE. We assessed the efficacy of the two ICIs across various factors. Results: The progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between Atezo + CE and Durva + CE/PE as first‐line chemotherapy treatments for SCLC. We observed no significant differences in age, sex, performance status (PS), liver metastasis, bone metastasis, or platinum‐based agent usage between the treatment cohorts. However, a marked improvement in PFS and OS was observed in the solitary patient with brain metastasis treated with Atezo + CE. Conclusion: The primary distinction between these treatments was observed in the management of patients with brain metastasis. The literature lacks comparative studies on the effects of first‐line ICI treatment on the central nervous system, rendering our findings significant in clinical practice. Despite the retrospective nature of this study and the potential for various biases, we recommend the preferential use of Atezo + CE in patients with brain metastasis to potentially enhance prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ETER701 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart combined with anlotinib plus etoposide/cisplatin (BEN-AL-EC) as a first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Results indicated that BEN-AL-EC, when compared with placebo in combination with etoposide/cisplatin (PLB-EC), significantly enhanced both progression-free and overall survival rates, while demonstrating an acceptable safety profile among patients with ES-SCLC. However, BEN-AL-EC is expensive, necessitating its cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: A Markov model with three health states was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BEN-AL-EC, AL-EC and PLB-EC for the treatment of ES-SCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Drug costs were derived from national tender prices, whereas other costs and utility values were derived from published literature. The key outcomes assessed included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic analyses, were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Results: The total cost of BEN-AL-EC was $55,117.42, yielding 1.09 QALYs, whereas that of PLB-EC was $15,238.15, yielding 0.71 QALYs. The ICER of BEN-AL-EC compared with PLB-EC was $106,249.42 per QALY gained. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,133 per QALY, BEN-AL-EC had a 0% probability of being cost-effective relative to PLB-EC. The key parameters influencing these outcomes included utility values for PFS, the cost of benmelstobart, and the discount rate. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, BEN-AL-EC as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC is unlikely to be cost-effective when compared with PLB-EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare lung cancer characterized by early metastasis and invasion. It is predominantly diagnosed at a locally advanced or metastatic stage, hindering the possibility of surgical intervention. However, a standard treatment for advanced PSC remains unestablished. This study evaluated the effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy-based strategies in patients with advanced PSC. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and data from three cancer centers were used in this retrospective study. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors. Results: In total, 202 patients with stage IV PSC were identified from the SEER database (median OS, 5 months). The median follow-up time of patients from the three centers was 18.8 months. First-line treatment with immunotherapy-based regimens and chemotherapy was administered to 12 and 27 patients, respectively. The median PFS was 2.1 and 7.3 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.40; P < 0.001], while the median OS was 3.6 and 21.4 months (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09–0.50; P < 0.001) in the chemotherapy and immune-based groups, respectively. The immunotherapy-based regimen was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08–0.55; P = 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08–0.49; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Conventional chemotherapy offered limited benefits in patients with advanced PSC; however, those who received first-line immunotherapy-based regimens exhibited significantly improved responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tucidinostat has been approved by the Chinese FDA for relapsed/refractory Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL), but its efficacy in newly diagnosed PTCL has not been confirmed. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of tucidinostat combined with CHOP-like (C + CHT) versus CHOP-like alone (CHT) in newly diagnosed PTCL patients. Of the PTCL patients, 109 were newly diagnosed. Patients in the C + CHT group who achieved objective response received tucidinostat maintenance therapy. A total of 36 pairs (n = 72) were matched at a ratio of 1:1 using propensity scoring. The matching criteria included: whether the Prognostic index for the peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified subtype (PIT) was ≥ 2, the pathological subtype, age > 60 years, and gender (matching tolerance = 0.024). A significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (P = 0.016), 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.026), and 2-year survival rate (P = 0.017) was observed for the C + CHT group as compared to the CHT group. After propensity score matching (PSM), the C + CHT group as compared to the CHT group displayed significantly longer PFS (P = 0.035) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.029). For the C + CHT group in the per-protocol set, the effect values showed a significant benefit in terms of both PFS (P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.019). Common grade 3–4 haematological adverse events (AEs), had comparable incidence in each group; while common non-haematological AEs, including elevated AST and ALT were higher in the C + CHT group than in the CHT group. Our study suggests that the tucidinostat with CHOP-like regimen and sequential tucidinostat maintenance after objective remission provides a promising therapeutic approach for treating newly diagnosed PTCL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose of Review: In this review, we discuss which patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may be most suitable for frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, a treatment option supported by emerging long-term efficacy data including overall survival and quality of life. We specifically focus on tivozanib, a potent and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, which has comparable efficacy to other single-agent TKIs in frontline treatment for mRCC while exhibiting fewer off-target side effects. Recent Findings: Combination therapy with TKIs and checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and CPI/CPI combination therapies, as well as TKI monotherapy are recommended frontline treatment options for mRCC. Treatment decisions are complex and based on several factors, including the patient's International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk status, age, comorbidities, and personal preferences related to response, tolerability, and quality of life. TKIs not only serve as backbone of most combination therapies for mRCC, but also remain a viable monotherapy option in the first-line setting for patients in favorable risk groups and those with contraindications to CPI combination therapies. Summary: Given that overall survival benefits have not yet been confirmed for CPI-containing combination regimens in favorable risk patients, we argue that frontline single-agent TKI treatment remains a standard of care option for these patients. This is supported by treatment guidelines, even in the era of TKI/CPI combination therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The ORIENT-15 double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resulted in better clinical outcomes. In this analysis, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC from a healthcare system perspective in China. Methods A partitioned survival model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy alone with sintilimab for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC patients. Clinical data were obtained from the ORIENT-15 trial and extrapolated to 10 years. Health state utilities and costs were sourced from the literature and from public healthcare institutions. The primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Two different sensitivity analyses, one-way and probabilistic, were performed to assess model uncertainty. Results Sintilimab-based chemotherapy was more costly ($31699.21 vs. $20687.42) and more effective (0.74 vs. 0.53) than placebo-based chemotherapy, resulting in an ICER of $51908.19 /QALY, which is greater than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China ($38223/QALY). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the PFS and cost of sintilimab were the major influencing factors affecting the results. Conclusions In patients with locally advanced or metastatic OSCC, sintilimab chemotherapy could improve survival time and health benefits compared with traditional chemotherapy, but the present analysis suggests that sintilimab is not a cost-effective treatment option in China.

Background: Patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have limited first-line treatment options and a poor prognosis. The GLOW clinical trial showed that zolbetuximab plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) significantly prolonged these patients' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objectives: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of zolbetuximab plus CAPOX as a first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States and China. Design: The cost-effective analysis. Methods: Based on the GLOW clinical trial data (NCT03653507), we constructed a 10-year Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the zolbetuximab or placebo plus CAPOX treatment regimen. Only direct medical costs were considered. The primary outcomes of the model were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of the model. Results: In the United States, zolbetuximab plus CAPOX added 0.24 QALYs and resulted in an incremental cost of $196,791.11 compared with placebo plus CAPOX, which had an ICER of $821,515.65 per QALY gained. For China, the zolbetuximab group gained 0.23 QALYs at an incremental cost of $62,822.69, resulting in an ICER of $273,568.01/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were most sensitive to the price of zolbetuximab. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX had 0% cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150,000/QALY in the United States and $38,188/QALY in China. Conclusion: Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX may be a cost-effective option for patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma when the price of zolbetuximab reduced by 83.37% ($367.7/100 mg) in the United States and 82.25% ($110.8/100 mg) in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Assess factors associated with first-line (1L) treatment for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Materials & methods: A cross-sectional survey of 250 US oncologists was conducted. Correlations were calculated between treatment class and demographics, treatment perceptions and other clinical/nonclinical characteristics. Results: Efficacy and safety/tolerability were critical in oncologists' 1L decision-making. CDK4/6i use positively correlated with proportion of Medicare and postmenopausal patients (r = 0.54–0.67). Chemotherapy use demonstrated positive correlations with perimenopausal and premenopausal patients and symptom burden (r = 0.31–0.42). Aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy correlated positively with anticipated treatment compliance (r = 0.42). Conclusion: Efficacy and safety/tolerability were most important to 1L decision-making. Clinical characteristics corresponded with CDK4/6i and chemotherapy use. Anticipated compliance was associated with AI monotherapy use. Plain Language Summary Patients in the USA with a certain type of metastatic breast cancer (mBC, i.e., HR+/HER2−) might get chemotherapy or hormone therapy alone instead of new and potentially better medicines called cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as their first treatment. Researchers wanted to understand how US cancer specialists decided the first treatment for this type of mBC. In a survey of 250 cancer specialists, researchers looked at different factors that might influence decision-making, including patient characteristics, doctors' opinions about the treatments and other medical and non-medical features. This study also examined the connections between these factors and the cancer specialists' choice of first treatment. Researchers found that cancer specialists care most about how well a treatment works and how safe it is when choosing the first treatment for HR+/HER2− mBC. They are more likely to use CDK4/6i if their patients have Medicare coverage or are older (i.e., women who have been through menopause). Chemotherapy is chosen if their patients are younger (i.e., women who are near and before menopause) or have more symptoms. Cancer specialists tend to choose first treatment with hormone therapy alone if they think their patients have a hard time following their treatment plan. The results showed that patient characteristics, doctors' opinions of treatments and other medical and non-medical factors play a role in choosing treatment for HR+/HER2− mBC. By understanding these factors, researchers can work toward improving treatment choices for patients with this type of mBC. Tweetable Abstract US #oncologists consider efficacy and safety as most important when selecting first-line treatment for #HR+/HER2− #metastaticbreastcancer. Different patient characteristics correlated with greater selection of #aromataseinhibitors, #chemotherapy and #CDK4/6inhibitors. Article highlights Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer globally, with 6% of women in the USA diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease. HR+/HER2− is the most common BC subtype, accounting for 87.4 new cases per 100,000 women. Endocrine therapy (ET) was traditionally preferred for HR+/HER2− metastatic disease (mBC), until recent therapeutic advances introduced cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with ET. Current guidelines recommend CDK4/6i+ET as the preferred first-line (1L) treatment, with approximately 60–63% adoption in routine US clinical practice. Findings from this study highlight that US oncologists prioritize anticipated treatment efficacy and safety/tolerability in 1L treatment decisions. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and nonclinical factors are also considerations in treatment decisions. Factors positively correlated with higher CDK4/6i use include a higher proportion of postmenopausal patients, Medicare coverage and emphasis on treatment efficacy and performance status. Increased chemotherapy use in the 1L setting is correlated with higher proportions of premenopausal and perimenopausal patients, along with an emphasis on symptom burden. Factors associated with higher aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy use include greater consideration of expected lack of treatment compliance, a higher proportion of perimenopausal patients and reliance on health insurance marketplace/state exchange coverage. Oncologists perceive CDK4/6i+ET as the appropriate 1L treatment, while chemotherapy is considered for patients with a high symptom burden and AI monotherapy is chosen when tolerability is a concern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab (EV-PEMB) was investigated as a first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in a phase III clinical trial (EV-302). The trial findings indicated significant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile. However, EV-PEMB is costly and it is unknown whether it is cost-effective compared to chemotherapy. This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of EV-PEMB versus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced UC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A Markov model with three distinct health states was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of EV-PEMB as a first-line treatment for advanced UC versus chemotherapy based on the EV-302 trial. Drug costs were obtained from national tender prices. Other expenses and utility values were sourced from the literature or expert advice. The findings of the study included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We conducted a one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to ensure the model's robustness. Results: The EV-PEMB regimen demonstrated a gain of 3.22 QALYs at $375,420.24, compared to the chemotherapy regimen with 1.70 QALYs at $23,369.67. ICER for EV-PEMB compared to chemotherapy was at $232,256.16 per QALY gained. In China, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,133 per QALY, EV-PEMB has a 0% probability of being cost-effective as a first-line treatment for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, EV-PEMB is unlikely to be a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as first ⁃line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic squamous non ⁃ small ⁃ cell lung cancer in the real ⁃world. Methods: A total of 109 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma were included in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from January 2021 to December 2023, of whom 66 patients in the tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy group and 43 patients in the chemotherapy group. The objective response rate (ORR), progression⁃free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of the two groups were evaluated. Results: At a median follow⁃up of 20.2 months, the ORR of the tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that of the chemotherapy group (75.8% vs. 51.2%) . The median PFS prolonged significantly in the tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (17.3 months vs. 9.3 months) . OS data were not reached in the tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy group, which was significantly longer than the chemotherapy group (19.3 months, HR=0.38, 95%CI: 0.19-0.68, P=0.002) . The incidence of overall TRAEs and TRAEs above grade 3 in the two groups was similar. The incidence of immune⁃related adverse events (irAEs) in the tislelizumab combined chemotherapy group was 28.8%, including one case (1.5%) of grade 3 and above immune⁃associated pneumonia. Conclusion: Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as first⁃line treatment significantly improves the efficacy and manageable safety/tolerability profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This narrative review explores the efficacy and applicability of anti-EGFR therapy as the first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It critically examines current guidelines, along with recent evidence in the literature, to assess whether it should be universally applied. Recent Findings: Recent evidences highlight the variability of the response to anti-EGFR therapies due to molecular diversity and several clinical factors, such as RAS mutational status and primary tumor location. Summary: Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for most patients with MSS, RAS-WT, left-sided mCRC. Whether this combination is the best treatment for these patients remains an open question. This review delves into the role of EGFR inhibition in mCRC, focusing on clinical factors and the knowledge of biology, molecular targets, and biomarkers. It underscores the crucial role of a personalized approach, empowering healthcare providers and equipping them with the confidence to make informed decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Best Practice Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab (EV-PEMB) was investigated as a first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in a phase III clinical trial (EV-302). The trial findings indicated significant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile. However, EV-PEMB is costly and it is unknown whether it is cost-effective compared to chemotherapy. This study aimed to conduct a costeffectiveness analysis of EV-PEMB versus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced UC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A Markov model with three distinct health states was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of EV-PEMB as a first-line treatment for advanced UC versus chemotherapy based on the EV-302 trial. Drug costs were obtained from national tender prices. Other expenses and utility values were sourced from the literature or expert advice. The findings of the study included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We conducted a one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to ensure the model's robustness. Results: The EV-PEMB regimen demonstrated a gain of 3.22 QALYs at $375,420.24, compared to the chemotherapy regimen with 1.70 QALYs at $23,369.67. ICER for EV-PEMB compared to chemotherapy was at $232,256.16 per QALY gained. In China, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,133 per QALY, EV-PEMB has a 0% probability of being cost-effective as a firstline treatment for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, EV-PEMB is unlikely to be a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are renal parenchymal neoplasms that contribute to <5% of cancer cases worldwide. Within the diverse group of renal tumours, clear cell carcinoma is the most common subtype. The recommended first-line treatment for metastatic disease is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor given either as monotherapy or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, based on improved survival outcomes. These endpoints are not only influenced by the initial risk stratification but also by certain variables such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line treatment in patients with metastatic RCC treated at our institute from the year 2017-2021. We also investigated the association of PFS with both Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk groups and the pretreatment NLR ratio. Results: Overall, 35 patients were enrolled after fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Of these, 25 patients received Pazopanib, 5 patients were treated with Sunitinib and the remaining patients were administered Pembrolizumab with Axitinib. Two-thirds of the study population belonged to the intermediate-risk group. The median PFS for all participants was 16 months. Among the overall population, patients in the favourable-risk group demonstrated superior PFS. Patients with elevated pretreatment NLR experienced shorter PFS compared to the patients with low to normal NLR. Conclusion: This review highlights the prognostic significance of initial risk stratification and pretreatment NLR in predicting the response to first-line treatment in metastatic RCC patients. As this is a comprehensive study emphasizing the outcomes of metastatic RCC in Pakistan, it fills a void in the literature by providing invaluable perspectives on the real-world outcomes of patients. This not only enhances our understanding of disease management in this region but also lays the foundation for future investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results. Results: Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16–0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46–4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09–0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84–5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3 years by applying RMST. Conclusions: We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response. Results: We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023). Conclusion: In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n  = 32; AG, n  = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P  = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P  < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P  = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. Conclusion The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In the ASTRUM-004 trial, serplulimab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significantly improved survival and controllable safety. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab plus chemotherapy in advanced squamous non‐small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC), considering the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A decision tree and a Markov model were constructed to simulate the treatment. The interesting results included total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Scenario, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to examine model instability. Results: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, serplulimab plus chemotherapy had an ICER of $55,539.46/QALY ($47,278.84/LY). The ICERs were estimated to be $58,706.03/QALY, $48,978.34/QALY and $59,709.54/QALY inpatients with programmed death-ligand 1 expression level of tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1%, 1% ≤ TPS < 50%, and TPS ≥ 50%. The cost-effective prices of serplulimab were $168.276/100 mg, $349.157/100 mg, and $530.039/100 mg at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $12,574.30/QALY, $25,148.60/QALY, and $37,722.90/QALY. Patient weight and price of serplulimab created the most significant impact. Presently, the probability of serplulimab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective was 14.15%. Conclusion: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, serplulimab plus chemotherapy might not be cost-effective in the first-line treatment for advanced sqNSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Programmed death receptor‐1 monoclonal antibodies (PD‐1 mAbs) have been applied in the treatment of different kinds of malignant tumors. However, a streamlined and expedited evaluation method for certain tumor types without approved indications is currently lacking in terms of their expandable applications. In this study, a novel evaluation method for the expandability of PD‐1 mAb was established for the first time. Clinical trial data of PD‐1 mAb in first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer were collected for comparison. For the first time, the clinical trial outcomes were analyzed through the entropy weight method and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to evaluate the effectiveness and safety. The accessibility was assessed using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) standard survey method. Combining the results of effectiveness, safety, and accessibility, the recommendation for expandability of PD‐1 mAb was provided. Tislelizumab ranks seventh in effectiveness, higher than the chemotherapy group and the pembrolizumab group, and ranks fourth in safety evaluation and first in the combination chemotherapy groups. The annual drug cost of tislelizumab is 0.497 times the annual household income for urban residents of Shaanxi Province. 56.67% of medical institutions are equipped with tislelizumab in Shaanxi Province. These results indicate the promising efficacy and safety profile of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a first‐line treatment option for advanced gastric cancer. Notably, tislelizumab emerges as a more accessible alternative to sintilimab and boasts greater affordability compared to nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Consequently, tislelizumab should be considered a viable option for expandable application in first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, contingent upon clinical necessity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is a heterogeneous disease with varied prognoses, that is affected by many clinicopathological features. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment (FLx), and prognostic impact of these features on survival among Syrian patients with ABC. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ABC. The association of clinicopathological factors with survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, as well as the Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HaR). Results: A total of 423 patients with ABC were included in the study, with a median age (range) of 47 years (23-82). 83% of metastases were metachronous. Most patients (91.8%) received chemotherapy as the FLx. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all the patients were 7 and 16 months, respectively. The median PFS was associated with four factors, which were time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=1.861, 95% CI 1.420-2.438, P<0.0001), performance status (PS) (adjusted HaR=1.456, 95% CI 1.049-2.021, P=0.025), ovarian metastasis (adjusted HaR=7.907, 95% CI 1.049-59.576, P=0.045), and FLx (adjusted HaR=2.536, 95% CI 1.581-4.068, P<0.0001). Similarly, the OS was associated with three factors, including hormone receptors (HRs) status (adjusted HaR=1.124, 95% CI 1.009-1.252, P=0.034), time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=2.099, 95% CI 1.588-2.775, P<0.0001), and PS (adjusted HaR=1.787, 95% CI 1.429-2.233, P<0.0001). In the HR-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-negative group, endocrine therapy was significantly associated with longer PFS compared with chemotherapy (15 vs 7 months, adjusted HaR=2.699, 95% CI 1.417-5.143, P=0.003). Furthermore, there was no difference in OS between the two treatment modalities (P=0.855). Conclusions: ABC survival varies depending on the location of metastases. Good PS and synchronous stage 4 disease were independent prognostic factors for longer PFS and OS. In the HR-positive/HER2-negative group, PFS for endocrine therapy was significantly longer than chemotherapy, with no differences in OS. This study confirms that endocrine therapy is preferred as an FLx for ABC in the HR-positive/HER2-negative group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic impact of pembrolizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin versus placebo combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China. METHODS: From the perspective of China’ s health system, the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at 3 times of China’ s gross domestic product ( GDP) per capita in 2022, that is 257 094. 00 RMB/ quality-adjusted life year (QALY), Markov model and partitioned survival model were constructed to conduct cost-effectiveness analysis, univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to analyze the effects of parameters on the model’s robustness, and to analyze the economic outcome of pembrolizumab under the patient assistance program scenario. RESULTS: The results of Markov model analysis showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 2 758 043. 34 RMB/QALY for the pembrolizumab group versus the placebo group, and 730 319. 70 RMB/QALY under the patient assistance program scenario, which were both higher than the set WTP threshold; in the absence of patient assistance program, the cost-effectiveness price of pembrolizumab was 1 452. 45 RMB/100 mg, and the partitioned survival model results had validated the Markov model results. CONCLUSIONS: Under the WTP threshold of 3 times of 2022 China’s per capita GDP, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer does not have cost-effectiveness advantage, and lowering the price of pembrolizumab can increase the probability of its cost-effectiveness advantage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate the outcomes of first‐line imatinib versus nilotinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML‐CP) in real‐world clinical practice. Methods: A propensity score analysis was performed to eliminate imbalances between the treatment groups. In the analysis, 163 patients in the nilotinib group and 163 patients in the matched imatinib group were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Nilotinib‐treated patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response more rapidly than imatinib‐treated patients. However, there was no significant difference in 5‐year overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) between the two groups (OS: 94.3% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.602; PFS: 92.9% vs. 88.0%, p = 0.614). Nilotinib‐treated patients had a higher failure‐free survival (FFS) and event‐free survival (EFS) than imatinib‐treated patients (FFS: 71.7% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.040; EFS: 71.7% vs. 53.5%, p = 0.025). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis from clinical practice did not confirm any benefit of frontline nilotinib treatment for OS and PFS; however, it did demonstrate higher FFS and EFS in the nilotinib cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To analyse at our institution the criteria for selecting a first-line therapy for patients with advanced radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and their clinical responses, safety and survival outcomes. Patients and methods: We extracted data from 69 consecutive patients referred to Federico II University Hospital from September 2016 to September 2024, among whom 44 patients were treated with TKIs as first-line treatment and outside any clinical trial, and form the basis of this report. Results: Thirty-one (71%) patients were treated with the antiangiogenesis inhibitor lenvatinib and 13 (29%) were treated with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (s-TKIs). Among the latter, eight patients were treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (DT), two patients were treated with selpercatinib because of contraindications to lenvatinib, and three patients received DT as redifferentiation therapy. A RECIST partial response was observed in 28% of patients treated with lenvatinib, in 63% of those treated with DT and in one of the two patients treated with selpercatinib. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 13 (42%) patients treated with lenvatinib and only in 1 (9%) patient treated with DT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates at 1 year were 72% and 83% in lenvatinib-treated patients and 69% and 83% in DT-treated patients, respectively. In both selpercatinib-treated patients, the PFS at data cut-off was 10 months. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion: S-TKIs permitted tailoring systemic treatment based on disease location, tumour volume and patient comorbidities, achieving satisfactory tolerance and outcomes in selected patients with an actionable driver mutation and with contraindications to angiogenesis inhibitors or candidates for redifferentiation therapy.

BackgroundSeveral head-to-head meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (M+) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation encompassing multiple treatment strategies. Our objective is to conduct a network meta-analysis that includes various treatment modalities, enabling both direct and indirect comparisons for a more thorough assessment.MethodsWe conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Stata 15.0 and R 4.3.2 software were utilized for the network meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 30 RCTs, comprising 8654 participants, were included. The study encompassed the following 19 treatments: Chemotherapy; Afatinib; Afatinib + Cetuximab; Apatinib + Gefitinib; Befotertinib; Cetuximab + Chemotherapy; Erlotinib; Erlotinib + Bevacizumab; Erlotinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib; Gefitinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib + Olaparib; Icotinib; Icotinib + Chemotherapy; Lazertinib; Naquotinib; Osimertinib; Osimertinib + Bevacizumab; Osimertinib + Chemotherapy. The network meta-analysis results indicated that, in terms of PFS, Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) were the most effective. Regarding OS, Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) emerged as the top three options. Afatinib (SUCRAs: 92.27%) was associated with the best ORR improvement. For ≥3AEs, Afatinib (SUCRAs: 74.93%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 69.42%) were likely the best choices.ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that, considering both survival and safety, Osimertinib stands out as the preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M + advanced or metastatic nsq-NSCLC. Notably, the combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy demonstrated superior survival benefits. However, due to the limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions await further validation through more high-quality research.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024562981, identifier CRD42024562981.

Pediatric low-grade gliomas are the most common brain tumours in childhood and adolescence. Despite the excellent prognosis, pediatric low-grade glioma survivors may suffer from variable long-term complications and may require repeated therapies, implying that this is a chronic disease. The current review describes the European Standard Clinical Practice recommendations for low-grade gliomas at primary diagnosis, that were developed on behalf of SIOPe BTG LGG Working Group within the framework of European Reference Network PaedCan. The manuscript describes the diverse spectrum of pediatric low-grade gliomas in terms of location, age, underlying cancer predisposition syndromes, and special circumstances, such as infantile chiasmatic hypothalamic glioma and diencephalic syndrome, as well as current diagnostic criteria and indications for treatment. Furthermore, it provides current knowledge in histopathology and molecular pathology. Finally, the review focuses on the need for a multidisciplinary approach and treatment indications providing a guide on current treatment modalities, used as first-line therapy in Europe along with information on adverse effects, and follow-up.

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting. Methods This was a retrospective study on patients with EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients received Rh-endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy every three weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. As of data cutoff (December 13, 2022), the median follow-up of 21.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-44.4 months). The median PFS and OS was 22.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-27.4) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 23.4-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. The ORR was 72.06% (95% CI: 59.85-82.27%), and DCR was 95.59% (95% CI: 87.64-99.08%). Patients with stage IIIB/IIIC NSCLC had significantly longer median PFS (23.4 vs. 13.2 months), longer median OS (not reached vs. 18.0 months), and higher ORR (89.2% vs. 51.6%) than those with stage IV NSCLC (all p ≤ 0.001). The ORR was higher in patients with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) than in those with low PD-L1 expression or positive PD-L1 expression (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16 (23.53%) patients. Conclusions Rh-endostatin combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment yielded favorable effectiveness with a manageable profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, representing a promising treatment modality.

ROS1 rearrangements are considered rare in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective real-world study aimed to evaluate first-line treatment with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care vs. new generation ROS1 anti-cancer agents. Forty-nine ROS1-expressing NSCLC patients, diagnosed with advanced metastatic disease, were included. Molecular profiling using either FISH/CISH or NGS was performed on tissue samples. Twenty-eight patients were treated with crizotinib, while fourteen patients were administered newer drugs (entrectinib, repotrectinib) and seven patients received platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a first-line setting. Overall response rate and disease control rate for the crizotinib and entrectinb/repotrectinib cohort were 68% and 82% vs. 86% and 93%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 1.6 years (95% CI 1.15–2.215) for the crizotinib treatment vs. 2.35 years for the entrectinib/repotrectinib cohort (95% CI 1.19–3.52). Central nervous system progression was noted in 20% and 25% of the crizotinib and entrectinib/repotrectinib cohorts, respectively. This multi-center study presents real-world treatment patterns of ROS1 NSCLC population, indicating that crizotinib exhibited comparable results to entrectinib/repotrectinib in a first-line setting, although both response rate and survival was numerically longer with treatment with newer agents.

Introduction: Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) encompass a wide range of diseases from precancerous states such as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis to the rapidly growing Burkitt lymphoma. In 2022, we witnessed two new classifications for these malignant lymphoid tumors: The World Health Organization (WHO) 5th edition Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms (ICC). Areas Covered: Given our improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying lymphomagenesis at the molecular level, several novel agents have been or are being actively developed, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Therefore, this review features new and developing first-line pharmacotherapies in NHL. It is organized by the mechanism of action of the drug with the relevant key trials highlighted. Expert opinion: We provide an overview of the development of curative combination chemotherapies for lymphomas, and then discuss the importance of working on a unified classification for these tumors. We discuss resistance to targeted therapies, particularly with the continuous use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, how to sequence T-cell therapies (bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor therapy), and the impact of financial toxicity. We also review possible strategies to increase cure rates at lower costs, with less toxicity, and while promoting global health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the landscape of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) treatment, anthracyclines have shown efficacy; however, their associated toxicity imposes significant limitations, especially in frail elderly patients with mSTS who are highly susceptible to severe adverse effects. In this context, trabectedin, due to its distinct pharmacological profile and safety profile, may represent an interesting alternative being demonstrated to be active in treating mSTS. These features hold particular significance for elderly and unfit patients with mSTS, where balancing treatment benefits with potential adverse effects represents the pivotal objective. Methods: The investigation was focused on a specific group of 11 elderly patients with mSTS aged =70, all undergoing first-line treatment with trabectedin, and it was supported by comprehensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. Among these patients, 9 out of 11 started the treatment at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2. Results: The primary objective of this investigation is to highlight trabectedin as a valuable first-line treatment option for elderly and unfit patients with mSTS. Additionally, this investigation seeks to explore whether higher administered doses of trabectedin can enhance clinical outcomes while maintaining the same toxicity profiles. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 77 days (95% CI, 53-89), the median overall survival (OS) was 397 days (95% CI, 66-2,102), while the overall toxicity of grade 3-4 severity amounted to 43%. Conclusion: These findings provide new insights into the clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with trabectedin in an elderly patient population, enhancing our understanding of better treatment approaches for a specific population of patients with mSTS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting. Methods: This was a retrospective study on patients with EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients received Rh-endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy every three weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. As of data cutoff (December 13, 2022), the median follow-up of 21.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-44.4 months). The median PFS and OS was 22.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-27.4) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 23.4-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. The ORR was 72.06% (95% CI: 59.85-82.27%), and DCR was 95.59% (95% CI: 87.64-99.08%). Patients with stage IIIB/IIIC NSCLC had significantly longer median PFS (23.4 vs. 13.2 months), longer median OS (not reached vs. 18.0 months), and higher ORR (89.2% vs. 51.6%) than those with stage IV NSCLC (all p ≤ 0.001). The ORR was higher in patients with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) than in those with low PD-L1 expression or positive PD-L1 expression (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16 (23.53%) patients. Conclusions: Rh-endostatin combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment yielded favorable effectiveness with a manageable profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, representing a promising treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current standard of care for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer is pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel as first‐line therapy. However, with the development of newer treatment regimens, there is a lack of evidence regarding which is the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this network meta‐analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first‐line regimens for advanced HER2‐positive breast cancer by indirect comparisons. Methods: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis were conducted. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published through to December 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to compare progression‐free survival (PFS) between treatments, and the odds ratio and 95% CrI were used to compare the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Twenty randomized clinical trials that included 15 regimens and 7094 patients were analyzed. Compared with the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen, PFS was longer on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.41, 95% CrI: 0.22–0.75) and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.65, 95% CrI: 0.43–0.98). Consistent with the results for PFS, the ORR was better on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen than on the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen was most likely to rank first in achieving the best PFS and ORR. Comparable results were found for grade ≥3 AE rates of ≥10%. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen is most likely to be the optimal first‐line therapy for patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ROS1 rearrangements are considered rare in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective real-world study aimed to evaluate first-line treatment with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care vs. new generation ROS1 anti-cancer agents. Forty-nine ROS1-expressing NSCLC patients, diagnosed with advanced metastatic disease, were included. Molecular profiling using either FISH/CISH or NGS was performed on tissue samples. Twenty-eight patients were treated with crizotinib, while fourteen patients were administered newer drugs (entrectinib, repotrectinib) and seven patients received platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a first-line setting. Overall response rate and disease control rate for the crizotinib and entrectinb/repotrectinib cohort were 68% and 82% vs. 86% and 93%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 1.6 years (95% CI 1.15–2.215) for the crizotinib treatment vs. 2.35 years for the entrectinib/repotrectinib cohort (95% CI 1.19–3.52). Central nervous system progression was noted in 20% and 25% of the crizotinib and entrectinib/repotrectinib cohorts, respectively. This multi-center study presents real-world treatment patterns of ROS1 NSCLC population, indicating that crizotinib exhibited comparable results to entrectinib/repotrectinib in a first-line setting, although both response rate and survival was numerically longer with treatment with newer agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atypical L858R or other L858X mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, beyond the classical EGFRL858R mutation caused by c.2573 T > G, have been identified in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet their genomic features and survival benefits with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment have not been fully explored. We retrospectively enrolled 489 NSCLC patients with baseline tumor tissue/plasma samples carrying uncommon EGFRL858R (N = 124), EGFRL858Q/M (N = 17), or classical EGFRL858R mutations (N = 348). The comparison of molecular features was performed using treatment‐naïve tumor tissues. Survival benefits and resistance mechanisms of first‐line EGFR TKI treatment were studied in an advanced disease subcohort. NSCLCs harboring uncommon EGFRL858R had lower TP53 mutation prevalence (p = 0.04) and chromosome instability scores (p = 0.02) than those with classical EGFRL858R. Concomitant EGFRL861Q mutations were enriched in NSCLCs with EGFRL858Q/M (p < 0.01), with cooccurrence in those carrying EGFRL858M. Patients with uncommon EGFRL858R experienced improved progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to those with classical EGFRL858R (median: 13.0 vs. 10.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.80). The association remained significant when adjusting for sex, age, histological subtype, TKI category, and anti‐vascular therapy (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39–0.77). Furthermore, EGFRL858Q/M patients showed enhanced first‐line PFS (vs. classical EGFRL858R, HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10–0.67), potentially benefiting more from afatinib. Additionally, NSCLCs with uncommon EGFRL858R and classical EGFRL858R had similar resistance profiles to EGFR TKIs. In conclusion, NSCLCs carrying atypical EGFR L858 aberrations, which had fewer TP53 mutations and higher chromosome stability, exhibited improved PFS under first‐line EGFR TKIs than those with the classical EGFRL858R. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Both camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (CTC) and sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin (SGP) have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China (NMPA) for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. However, the comparison of the two treatments as first-line treatments in efficacy or pharmacoeconomics has barely been studied. To deeply understand the costs and outcomes of the two treatments, this work directly compared the cost-effectiveness for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland. Methods: A network meta-analysis was first performed based on the three clinical trials, namely, CameL-Sq, ORIENT-12, and C-TONG1002, to compare the clinical benefits of the two treatments. The Weibull approximation was applied to further calculate the life expectancy of the two treatments. The partitioned survivalmodel (PSM) was next established, and one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to evaluate the stability of the underlying parameter values and assumptions within the model. Results: CTC treatment gained 0.68 QALYs and cost $14,764. SGP treatment gained 0.54 QALYs and cost $14,584. The CTC arm gained 0.14 additional QALYs and cost $179 more than the SGP arm, and the ICERs was $1,269/QALY, which was lower than one-fold GDP per capita in the Chinese mainland ($12,734 GDP per capita in 2022). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when the WTP ranged from $12,734-38,202 (1-3 folds, 2022 GDP per capita in China), the CTC group had higher probabilities than the SGP group for being cost effective, which ranged from 85.65% to 88.38%. Conclusion: From the perspective of the payers, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective compared with sintilimab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]