Search

Background: There is a small level of evidence regarding the alterations in global spine alignment following the restoration of cervical lordosis using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Different cage types are available to restore cervical lordosis through ACDF. In this study, we evaluate the impact of two types of these cages on local and global spine alignments. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 46 ± 10 who underwent ACDF for cervical disc herniation were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided according to their cage type into two groups, 17 patients with standalone conventional polyether ether ketone cages and 15 patients with integrated cage and plate (ICP) (Perfect-C®). Cervical alignment and global spine alignment were evaluated on the pre- and post-operative EOS® images. Results: Three months after the ACDF, total cervical lordosis correction was higher in patients with ICP (P = 0.001), while the local cervical lordosis correction was not significantly different between conventional cages and prefect-C cages (P = 0.067). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt change were significantly higher among patients with Perfect-c cages (P = 0.043). Conclusion: In patients undergoing ACDF, alignment of the global spine changes along with the restoration of the cervical spine. Cage type affects this association, mainly through the compensatory alteration of pelvic tilt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a small level of evidence regarding the alterations in global spine alignment following the restoration of cervical lordosis using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Different cage types are available to restore cervical lordosis through ACDF. In this study, we evaluate the impact of two types of these cages on local and global spine alignments. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 46 ± 10 who underwent ACDF for cervical disc herniation were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided according to their cage type into two groups, 17 patients with standalone conventional polyether ether ketone cages and 15 patients with integrated cage and plate (ICP) (Perfect-C®). Cervical alignment and global spine alignment were evaluated on the pre- and post-operative EOS® images. Results: Three months after the ACDF, total cervical lordosis correction was higher in patients with ICP (P = 0.001), while the local cervical lordosis correction was not significantly different between conventional cages and prefect-C cages (P = 0.067). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt change were significantly higher among patients with Perfect-c cages (P = 0.043). Conclusion: In patients undergoing ACDF, alignment of the global spine changes along with the restoration of the cervical spine. Cage type affects this association, mainly through the compensatory alteration of pelvic tilt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a small level of evidence regarding the alterations in global spine alignment following the restoration of cervical lordosis using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Different cage types are available to restore cervical lordosis through ACDF. In this study, we evaluate the impact of two types of these cages on local and global spine alignments. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 46 ± 10 who underwent ACDF for cervical disc herniation were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided according to their cage type into two groups, 17 patients with standalone conventional polyether ether ketone cages and 15 patients with integrated cage and plate (ICP) (Perfect-C®). Cervical alignment and global spine alignment were evaluated on the pre- and post-operative EOS® images. Results: Three months after the ACDF, total cervical lordosis correction was higher in patients with ICP (P = 0.001), while the local cervical lordosis correction was not significantly different between conventional cages and prefect-C cages (P = 0.067). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt change were significantly higher among patients with Perfect-c cages (P = 0.043). Conclusion: In patients undergoing ACDF, alignment of the global spine changes along with the restoration of the cervical spine. Cage type affects this association, mainly through the compensatory alteration of pelvic tilt.

Objective To assess the effect that correction of lower lumbar lordosis (3L) has on global spine realignment due to the key role of 3L for scoliosis surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Methods This study is a retrospective review performed between June 2018 and January 2020, including consecutive patients with DLS. Only patients age ≥ 45 years who had already undergone a selective root block operation and had the procedure of long‐fusion extending to pelvis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at lower lumbar spine (L4‐S1) were retained for analysis. Spinopelvic parameters measured included thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), 3L, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) at pre‐operation and the third month follow‐up. The mismatch (PI‐LL) was calculated subsequently. Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were performed to explore the association of the changes in global spinopelvic parameters with 3L correction. Results Thirty‐nine patients (five males, 34 females) with the average age of 63.84 years (SD 7.53; range, 45–75 years) at the time of surgery were identified. All patients had the surgical procedure of long‐fusion (≥4 vertebras) with PLIF at lower lumbar spine between L4 and S1 spine. Lower instrumented vertebras (LIV) fused to pelvis (S1, 14; S2, 18; ilium, 7) were operated in all patients. Seventeen patients were with upper instrumented vertebras (UIV) at thoracolumbar spine (L2‐T11), and 22 patients at thoracic spine (T10 and above). The median of instrumented segments was 10 (5–14). 3L significantly increased (P = 0.02) after surgical treatment by mean change of 4.21° (range, −19.7° to +22.2°). Perioperatively, all spinopelvic parameters regarding to TK, LL, SS, PT, TPA, SVA, and mismatch (PI‐LL) had significant changes (P

Objective: To assess the effect that correction of lower lumbar lordosis (3L) has on global spine realignment due to the key role of 3L for scoliosis surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Methods: This study is a retrospective review performed between June 2018 and January 2020, including consecutive patients with DLS. Only patients age ≥ 45 years who had already undergone a selective root block operation and had the procedure of long‐fusion extending to pelvis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at lower lumbar spine (L4‐S1) were retained for analysis. Spinopelvic parameters measured included thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), 3L, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) at pre‐operation and the third month follow‐up. The mismatch (PI‐LL) was calculated subsequently. Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were performed to explore the association of the changes in global spinopelvic parameters with 3L correction. Results: Thirty‐nine patients (five males, 34 females) with the average age of 63.84 years (SD 7.53; range, 45–75 years) at the time of surgery were identified. All patients had the surgical procedure of long‐fusion (≥4 vertebras) with PLIF at lower lumbar spine between L4 and S1 spine. Lower instrumented vertebras (LIV) fused to pelvis (S1, 14; S2, 18; ilium, 7) were operated in all patients. Seventeen patients were with upper instrumented vertebras (UIV) at thoracolumbar spine (L2‐T11), and 22 patients at thoracic spine (T10 and above). The median of instrumented segments was 10 (5–14). 3L significantly increased (P = 0.02) after surgical treatment by mean change of 4.21° (range, −19.7° to +22.2°). Perioperatively, all spinopelvic parameters regarding to TK, LL, SS, PT, TPA, SVA, and mismatch (PI‐LL) had significant changes (P < 0.001). The change in 3L correlated significantly with the changes in spinopelvic parameters (r = 0.772 for LL, −0.589 for SVA, −0.439 for TPA, and −0.428 for PI‐LL). After linear regression analysis, the formulas were obtained: d‐LL = 14.977 + 0.636 × d‐3L, (R2 = 0.596); d‐(PI‐LL) = 16.575 + 0.62 × d‐3L, (R2 = 0.183); d‐TPA = −7.284 to 0.358 × d‐3L, (R2 = 0.193); d‐SVA = −30.556–2.639 × d‐3L (R2 = 0.347). Conclusions: Correction in lower lumbar lordosis, following the surgical procedure of long‐fusion with PLIF at lower lumbar spine, could result in significant changes in full‐spine parameters. The significant association of changes in each of global spine parameter with the correction of 3L perioperatively could provide important information for surgeons to make a surgical plan for spinal correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an autoimmune spondylarthritis often associated with rigid kyphoscoliosis. The authors describe a surgical approach that employs multilevel three-column osteotomies for the restoration of normal global alignment., Observations: A 48-year-old male with a past medical history of AS presented to the clinic with a stooped-over posture: his chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) was 58.0°; T1 slope (T1S), 97.8°; thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1-12), 94.2°; proximal TK (T1-5), 50.8°; distal TK (T5-12), 43.5°; and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), 22.6 cm. A two-stage procedure was planned. During stage 1, instrumentation was placed from C5 to T10, followed by a T3 vertebral column resection. During stage 2, bilateral pedicle screws were placed from T11 to the pelvis. An L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) was completed and was followed by a T7 PSO. Postoperatively, the patient had significant postural improvement: CBVA was 29.3°; T1S, 57.8°; TK, 77.3°; proximal TK, 33.5°; distal TK, 43.8°; and SVA, 15 cm. At 6 years postoperatively, the patient continued to do well and was without evidence of construct breakdown., Lessons: The authors propose that multilevel three-column osteotomies, if optimally located, successfully correct spinal malalignment associated with AS.

Background Context: Studies of the changes in spine alignment in the sitting position have been limited to specific spine segments. Because there have been few studies of global spinopelvic alignment in the sitting position, it is important to assess the changes associated with this position for such settings as developing future design of seats and achieving appropriate restoration of spine alignment.Purpose: This study aimed to measure changes in global spine alignment when people are sitting in car seats and to analyze the characteristics of those changes.Study Design: This was a prospective, collaborative study of the radiological evaluation of changes in global spine alignment.Patient Sample: The study included 113 asymptomatic adult participants (56 men and 57 women) without a history of spine disease or lower limb surgery, and with no current lower back or leg pain.Outcome Measures: Radiographic findings were assessed by measurement of various angles: cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA).Methods: Radiographs were obtained in the standing and sitting positions. The objective variables analyzed statistically were spine alignments (CL, TK, TLK, LL, C7-SVA, T1SPI, TPA, SS, PT, and PI) measured in the standing position, body alignments (CL, TK, TLK, LL, C7-SVA, T1SPI, TPA, SS, and PT) measured in the sitting position, and stand-to-sit changes (∆CL, ∆TK, ∆TLK, ∆LL, ∆C7-SVA, ∆T1SPI, ∆TPA, ∆SS, and ∆PT). Explanatory variables were sex, age, body height, and body mass index.Results: Changing posture from standing to sitting decreased CL by an average of 5.3°, slightly decreased TK by an average of 1.3°, increased TLK by an average of 6.8°, decreased LL by an average of 35°, decreased SS by an average of 49.2°, increased PT by an average of 49.2°, shifted C7-SVA backward by an average of 106.7 mm, decreased T1SPI by an average of 18.8°, and increased TPA by an average of 21.1°. Statistical analysis revealed that ΔLL was significantly decreased in elderly participants. After the stand-to-sit change, ΔTLK and ∆TPA were significantly increased in taller participants and ΔT1SPI was significantly decreased in taller participants.Conclusions: Among other changes, most notably LL is decreased and the pelvic tilt is increased when a person is sitting in a car seat. However, these changes in spine alignment differ with age and height. These findings may be useful for the development of future design of seats and for achieving appropriate surgical restoration of spine alignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a small level of evidence regarding the alterations in global spine alignment following the restoration of cervical lordosis using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Different cage types are available to restore cervical lordosis through ACDF. In this study, we evaluate the impact of two types of these cages on local and global spine alignments., Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 46 ± 10 who underwent ACDF for cervical disc herniation were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided according to their cage type into two groups, 17 patients with standalone conventional polyether ether ketone cages and 15 patients with integrated cage and plate (ICP) (Perfect-C ® ). Cervical alignment and global spine alignment were evaluated on the pre- and post-operative EOS ® images., Results: Three months after the ACDF, total cervical lordosis correction was higher in patients with ICP ( P = 0.001), while the local cervical lordosis correction was not significantly different between conventional cages and prefect-C cages ( P = 0.067). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt change were significantly higher among patients with Perfect-c cages ( P = 0.043)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing ACDF, alignment of the global spine changes along with the restoration of the cervical spine. Cage type affects this association, mainly through the compensatory alteration of pelvic tilt., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.)