Search

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE—including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death—and MALE—defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This study aimed to examine the reporting quality of existing economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) included in China National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2013 (CHEERS 2013). Methods We performed a systematic literature research through 7 databases to identify published economic evaluations for GLDs included in the China NRDL up to March 2021. Reporting quality of identified studies was assessed by two independent reviewers based on the CHEERS checklist. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test were performed to examine the association between reporting quality and characteristics of the identified studies. Results We have identified 24 studies, which evaluated six GLDs types. The average score rate of the included studies was 77.41% (SD:13.23%, Range 47.62%-91.67%). Among all the required reporting items, characterizing heterogeneity (score rate = 4.17%) was the least satisfied item. Among six parts of CHEERS, results part scored least at 0.55 (score rate = 54.79%) because of the incompleteness of characterizing uncertainty. Results from the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test showed that model choice, journal type, type of economic evaluations, and study perspective were associated with the reporting quality of the studies. Conclusions There remains room to improve the reporting quality of economic evaluations for GLDs in NRDL. Checklists such as CHEERS should be widely used to improve the reporting quality of economic researches in China.

Objective: Kidney transplantation is the gold standard therapeutic alternative for patients with end‐stage renal disease; nevertheless, it is not without potential complications leading to considerable morbidity and mortality such as post‐transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). This narrative review aims to comprehensively evaluate PTDM in terms of its diagnostic approach, underlying pathophysiological pathways, epidemiological data, and management strategies. Methods: Articles were retrieved from electronic databases using predefined search terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating PTDM diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and management strategies. Results: PTDM emerges as a significant complication following kidney transplantation, influenced by various pathophysiological factors including peripheral insulin resistance, immunosuppressive medications, infections, and proinflammatory pathways. Despite discrepancies in prevalence estimates, PTDM poses substantial challenges to transplant. Diagnostic approaches, including traditional criteria such as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c, are limited in their ability to capture early PTDM manifestations. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) emerges as a valuable tool, particularly in the early post‐transplant period. Management strategies for PTDM remain unclear, within sufficient evidence from large‐scale randomized clinical trials to guide optimal interventions. Nevertheless, glucose‐lowering agents and life style modifications constitute primary modalities for managing hyperglycemia in transplant recipients. Discussion: The complex interplay between PTDM and the transplant process necessitates individualized diagnostic and management approaches. While early recognition and intervention are paramount, modifications to maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based solely on PTDM risk are not warranted, given the potential adverse consequences such as increased rejection risk. Further research is essential to refine management strategies and enhance outcomes for transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate whether sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy is associated with a reduction of renal events compared with other glucose‐lowering drugs (oGLDs) among Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and grade 3 (G3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a real‐world clinical practice setting. Materials and Methods: People with T2D who were newly prescribed an SGLT2i or an oGLD from April 2014 to November 2021 (without prior use of index drugs for ≥ 1 year prior to index date) and G3 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were selected from the Medical Data Vision database (MDV‐DB) and the Real‐World Data database (RWD‐DB). SGLT2i and oGLD users were matched (1:1) using propensity score on patient background characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of the development of end‐stage kidney disease or a sustained decline in eGFR of 50% or more. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Overall, 3190 (1595 per group) patients in the MDV‐DB and 2572 (1286 per group) patients in the RWD‐DB were included in the analyses. The composite outcome was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group than in the oGLD group in the MDV‐DB (HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 0.74, P < 0.001) and in the RWD‐DB (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.88, P = 0.011). Conclusions: Japanese people with T2D and G3 CKD initiating an SGLT2i had a lower risk of renal events than people initiating an oGLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to examine the reporting quality of existing economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) included in China National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2013 (CHEERS 2013). Methods: We performed a systematic literature research through 7 databases to identify published economic evaluations for GLDs included in the China NRDL up to March 2021. Reporting quality of identified studies was assessed by two independent reviewers based on the CHEERS checklist. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test were performed to examine the association between reporting quality and characteristics of the identified studies. Results: We have identified 24 studies, which evaluated six GLDs types. The average score rate of the included studies was 77.41% (SD:13.23%, Range 47.62%-91.67%). Among all the required reporting items, characterizing heterogeneity (score rate = 4.17%) was the least satisfied item. Among six parts of CHEERS, results part scored least at 0.55 (score rate = 54.79%) because of the incompleteness of characterizing uncertainty. Results from the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U test showed that model choice, journal type, type of economic evaluations, and study perspective were associated with the reporting quality of the studies. Conclusions: There remains room to improve the reporting quality of economic evaluations for GLDs in NRDL. Checklists such as CHEERS should be widely used to improve the reporting quality of economic researches in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. In recent decades, type-2 diabetes has become increasingly common, particularly in younger individuals. Diabetes leads to many vascular complications, including atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is a cardiovascular disease characterized by lipid-rich plaques within the vasculature. Plaques develop over time, restricting blood flow, and can, therefore, be the underlying cause of major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. Diabetes and atherosclerosis are intrinsically linked. Diabetes is a metabolic syndrome that accelerates atherosclerosis and increases the risk of developing other comorbidities, such as diabetes-associated atherosclerosis (DAA). Gold standard antidiabetic medications focus on attenuating hyperglycemia. Though recent evidence suggests that glucose-lowering drugs may have broader applications, beyond diabetes management. This review mainly evaluates the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as liraglutide and semaglutide in DAA. These drugs mimic gut hormones (incretins), which inhibit glucagon secretion while stimulating insulin secretion, thus improving insulin sensitivity. This facilitates delayed gastric emptying and increased patient satiety; hence, they are also indicated for the treatment of obesity. GLP-1 RAs have significant cardioprotective effects, including decreasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides levels. Liraglutide and semaglutide have specifically been shown to decrease cardiovascular risk. Liraglutide has displayed a myriad of antiatherosclerotic properties, with the potential to induce plaque regression. This review aims to address how glucose-lowering medications can be applied to treat diseases other than diabetes. We specifically focus on how nanomedicines can be used for the site-specific delivery of antidiabetic medicines for the treatment of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), the between-arm difference in the average probability of an event per unit of time (i.e., yearly incidence risk difference, YIRD) is an easy-to-interpret treatment effect metric. We aimed to quantify the YIRD in cardiorenal RCTs of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is. We digitally searched for RCTs published up to March 1st, 2023, including subjects with type 2 diabetes randomised to GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is and investigating cardiorenal outcomes or death. We extracted information from Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots to obtain time-to-event individual data and estimate within-arm yearly incidence risk and YIRD. Data from 19 RCTs (28 kM plots) were analysed: comparing treatment to placebo, in GLP-1RA RCTs the YIRD ranged from 0.2 % (95 % CI: −0.7 %, 1.1 %) to −1.9 % (−3.1, −0.7), for primary outcome; and from −0.2 % (−0.5, 0.2) to −0.4 % (−0.7 %, −0.0 %), for mortality. With the exception of SOLOIST-WHF (YIRD 11.9 % for primary outcome), corresponding estimates in SGLT-2is RCTs were: from −0.1 % (−0.4, 0.1) to −5.0 % (−7.7, −2.6), for primary outcome; and from −0.1 % (−0.2, 0.1) to −1.9 % (−4.4 %, 0.6 %), for mortality. The YIRD metric complements other relative treatment effect estimates and helps quantify the absolute benefit of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is. • Yearly incidence risk difference (YIRD) can help interpreting treatment effect. • Using reconstructed time-to-event data, we estimated YIRD in cardiorenal trials. • YIRDs was estimated for primary outcomes and death in GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-is trials. • YIRD is easy-to-interpret and could add insights in clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), including Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have demonstrated superior cardio- and renal protective benefits compared to older GLDs in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study examined the trends of the newer GLDs use in people with T2D who had a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure in the United States. We used 2005–2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Individuals with self-reported diabetes and CVD history were identified. There was a steady increase in the use of GLP-1RA only from 2008 (3 %) to 2019 (21 %) and SGLT2i only from 2014 (5 %) to 2019 (12 %). Individuals with dual use of both newer GLD classes increased from 0.62 % in 2015 to 6 % in 2019. The overall uptake of these two newer drugs in 2019 was less than 40 %. In other words, 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments. The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among individuals with T2D and a history of CVD was low and varied by insurance type. Policy-level interventions are needed to improve the use of these newer treatments further. We examined how newer glucose-lowering drugs are used among individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for coronary heart disease or heart failure in the US. We found that 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments due to the variation of insurance type. • The trends of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in people with T2D who had a history of cardiovascular disease. • Subgroup analysis of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA utilization by health insurance type (Private, Medicare, or Medicaid). • Although the utilization of these newer GLDs has been increasing, their use among eligible populations remained low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aurélie Mailhac,1 Lars Pedersen,1 Anton Pottegård,2 Jens Søndergaard,3 Torben Mogensen,4 Henrik Toft Sørensen,1 Reimar W Thomsen1 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 3Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 4Danish Pharmacovigilance Council, Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkCorrespondence: Reimar W Thomsen, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark, Email rwt@clin.au.dkPurpose: A surge in the use of semaglutide injection (Ozempic®) approved to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) has led to a global supply shortage. We investigated contemporary user rates and clinical characteristics of semaglutide (Ozempic®) users in Denmark, and the extent of “off-label” prescribing for weight loss.Patients and Methods: Nationwide population-based cross-sectional study based on linked health registries January 2018 through December 2023. All adults who received a first prescription of semaglutide once weekly (Ozempic®) were included. We examined quarterly rates of new users and total user prevalences, using other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and weight loss medications as comparison. We also investigated user characteristics including T2D, glucose control, comedications, and cardiorenal disease.Results: The new user rate of semaglutide (Ozempic®) remained stable at approximately 4 per 1000 adult person-years between 2019 and 2021 and then accelerated, peaking at 10 per 1000 in the first quarter of 2023 after which it declined sharply. User prevalence increased to 91,626 users in Denmark in 2023. The proportion of semaglutide (Ozempic®) new users who had a record of T2D declined from 99% in 2018 to only 67% in 2022, increasing again to 87% in 2023. Among people with T2D who initiated semaglutide (Ozempic®) in 2023, 52% received antidiabetic polytherapy before initiation, 39% monotherapy, and 8% no antidiabetic therapy. Most T2D initiators had suboptimal glucose control, with 83% having an HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol and 68% ≥ 53 mmol/mol despite use of antidiabetic medication, and 29% had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or kidney disease.Conclusion: The use of semaglutide (Ozempic®) in Denmark has increased dramatically. Although not approved for weight loss without T2D, one-third of new users in 2022 did not have T2D. Conversely, most initiators with T2D had a clear medical indication for treatment intensification, and “off-label” use can only explain a minor part of the supply shortage.Keywords: drug utilization, epidemiology, anti-obesity drugs, glucose-lowering drugs, obesity, type 2 diabetes

Purpose: A surge in the use of semaglutide injection (Ozempic®) approved to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) has led to a global supply shortage. We investigated contemporary user rates and clinical characteristics of semaglutide (Ozempic®) users in Denmark, and the extent of "off-label" prescribing for weight loss. Patients and Methods: Nationwide population-based cross-sectional study based on linked health registries January 2018 through December 2023. All adults who received a first prescription of semaglutide once weekly (Ozempic®) were included. We examined quarterly rates of new users and total user prevalences, using other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and weight loss medications as comparison. We also investigated user characteristics including T2D, glucose control, comedications, and cardiorenal disease. Results: The new user rate of semaglutide (Ozempic®) remained stable at approximately 4 per 1000 adult person-years between 2019 and 2021 and then accelerated, peaking at 10 per 1000 in the first quarter of 2023 after which it declined sharply. User prevalence increased to 91,626 users in Denmark in 2023. The proportion of semaglutide (Ozempic®) new users who had a record of T2D declined from 99% in 2018 to only 67% in 2022, increasing again to 87% in 2023. Among people with T2D who initiated semaglutide (Ozempic®) in 2023, 52% received antidiabetic polytherapy before initiation, 39% monotherapy, and 8% no antidiabetic therapy. Most T2D initiators had suboptimal glucose control, with 83% having an HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol and 68% ≥ 53 mmol/mol despite use of antidiabetic medication, and 29% had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or kidney disease. Conclusion: The use of semaglutide (Ozempic®) in Denmark has increased dramatically. Although not approved for weight loss without T2D, one-third of new users in 2022 did not have T2D. Conversely, most initiators with T2D had a clear medical indication for treatment intensification, and "off-label" use can only explain a minor part of the supply shortage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Few studies explored the effect of the combination of glucose sodium-cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We recruited patients with T2D and AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treated with either SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA for at least 3 months before hospitalization. Subjects with HbA1c 50% was higher in the SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA group compared with both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA groups. Interpretation The combination of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D and AMI compared with either drug used alone, with a significant effect also on peri-infarcted myocardial rescue in patients without a second event. Trial registraition ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06017544.

Background: Few studies explored the effect of the combination of glucose sodium-cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We recruited patients with T2D and AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treated with either SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA for at least 3 months before hospitalization. Subjects with HbA1c < 7% at admission were considered in good glycemic control and maintained the same glucose-lowering regimen, while those with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%), at admission or during follow-up, were prescribed either a SGLT-2i or a GLP-1RA to obtain a SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA combination therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, re-acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure related to AMI during a 2-year follow-up. After 3 months, the myocardial salvage index (MSI) was assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography. Findings: Of the 537 subjects screened, 443 completed the follow-up. Of these, 99 were treated with SGLT-2i, 130 with GLP-1RA, and 214 with their combination. The incidence of MACE was lower in the combination therapy group compared with both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA treated patients, as assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (HR = 0.154, 95% CI 0.038–0.622, P = 0.009 vs GLP-1RA and HR = 0.170, 95% CI 0.046–0.633, P = 0.008 vs SGLT-2i). The MSI and the proportion of patients with MSI > 50% was higher in the SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA group compared with both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA groups. Interpretation: The combination of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D and AMI compared with either drug used alone, with a significant effect also on peri-infarcted myocardial rescue in patients without a second event. Trial registraition ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06017544. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The association between newer classes of glucose‐lowering drugs (GLDs) and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear. Objective: The aim was to examine the effect of newer GLDs on the risk of PD through a meta‐analysis of randomized outcome trials. Methods: The methods included randomized placebo‐controlled outcome trials that reported PD events associated with three newer classes of GLDs (ie, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists, and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors) in participants with or without type 2 diabetes. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Peto's method. Results: The study included 24 trials involving 33 PD cases among 185,305 participants during a median follow‐up of 2.2 years. Newer GLDs were significantly associated with a lower PD risk (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25–0.98) than placebo. Conclusion: Newer GLDs may possibly be associated with a decreased risk of PD; however, larger datasets are required to confirm or refute this notion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Drug metabolism might be altered in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to evaluate if initiation of glucose‐lowering drugs impacts warfarin efficacy and drug metabolism. Methods: First, we conducted a register‐based self‐controlled cohort study on Danish and Scottish warfarin users. Warfarin efficacy (international normalized ratio [INR]) was compared before and after initiation of glucose‐lowering drugs. Second, we conducted a clinical pharmacokinetic trial comprising treatment‐naïve type 2 diabetes patients. Patients ingested probe drugs for drug‐metabolizing enzymes (the Basel Cocktail) before initiating glucose‐lowering treatment, and after 3 and 12 weeks of treatment. Drug metabolism, glycaemic control, and inflammation were assessed on each visit. Results: In the Danish and Scottish cohorts (n = 982 and n = 44, respectively), initiating glucose‐lowering drugs reduced warfarin efficacy. INR decreased from 2.47 to 2.21 in the Danish cohort (mean difference −0.26; 95% CI −0.35; −0.17) and from 2.33 to 2.13 in the Scottish cohort (−0.21; 95% CI −0.52; 0.11) after initiation of glucose‐lowering treatment. This impact on INR was more pronounced among individuals with stronger effects of glucose‐lowering treatment. In the clinical pharmacokinetic trial (n = 10), initiating metformin did not affect drug metabolism after 3 weeks (geometric mean ratio of CYP3A metabolic ratio: 1.12 [95% CI: 0.95; 1.32]) or 12 weeks of metformin treatment. Glycaemic control improved during treatment, while inflammation remained low and unchanged during treatment. Conclusions: In conclusion, initiation of glucose‐lowering drugs among chronic warfarin users seems associated with a reduction in INR, particularly among individuals with a large decrease in HbA1c. This effect seems unrelated to CYP enzyme activity and warfarin drug metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims/Introduction This study aimed to understand the characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non‐RCTs according to therapeutic regimens through systematic literature review. Materials and Methods PubMed and the database of the Japanese Medical Abstract Society (ICHUSHI) were searched for studies published from 2010 to 2019 reporting the efficacy and safety of glucose‐lowering drugs in Japanese individuals with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes, and therapeutic regimens, demographics and clinical characteristics at the baseline were extracted. We evaluated the treatment arms, not the placebo arms. Results The literature searches identified 2,656 publications, 145 of which met all eligibility criteria and included 282 eligible arms. In the past 10 years, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor was the most frequently studied in both RCTs and non‐RCTs. Regarding the characteristics of enrolled subjects, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist have been studied more in relatively obese subjects, and insulin has been studied in higher proportion of subjects with disease duration ≥10 years. Most of the RCTs included subjects aged 55–64 years, whereas a higher proportion of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor and insulin arms in the non‐RCTs included those aged ≥65 years. Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor were evaluated in subjects with no abnormalities in blood pressure or lipid parameters; however, only a few reports of those parameters have been assessed with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist and insulin. Conclusions As RCTs and non‐RCTs differ in the baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects, it is necessary to integrate and evaluate both to understand the actual treatment status of type 2 diabetes.

Introduction: This study aimed to understand the actual status of multimorbidity and polypharmacy among patients with type 2 diabetes using glucose-lowering drugs, and to assess the effects of patient characteristics on severe hypoglycemia and glycemic control. Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims and medical checkup data in Japan from April 2016 to February 2021 and identified patients with type 2 diabetes who were prescribed glucose-lowering drugs. We analyzed data on patient characteristics, including multimorbidity and polypharmacy, calculated the incidence rate for severe hypoglycemic events, applied a negative binomial regression model to explore factors that affected severe hypoglycemia, and analyzed the status of glycemic control in the subcohort for which HbA1c data were available. Results: Within the analysis population (n = 93,801), multimorbidity was present in 85.5% and mean ± standard deviation for oral drug prescriptions was 5.6 ± 3.5 per patient, while for those aged 75 years or older these numbers increased to 96.3% and 7.1 ± 3.5, respectively. The crude incidence rate for severe hypoglycemia was 5.85 (95% confidence interval 5.37, 6.37) per 1000 person-years. Risk factors for severe hypoglycemia included younger and older age, prior severe hypoglycemia, use of insulin, sulfonylurea, two-drug therapy including sulfonylurea or glinides, three-or-more-drug therapy, excessive polypharmacy, and comorbidities including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Subcohort analysis (n = 26,746) showed that glycemic control is not always maintained according to guidelines. Conclusion: Patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly older patients, experienced high multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Several risk factors for severe hypoglycemia were identified, most notably younger age, ESRD, history of severe hypoglycemia, and insulin therapy. Trial Registration: The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000046736). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most widespread chronic liver disease worldwide, confers a significant burden on health systems and leads to increased mortality and morbidity through several extrahepatic complications. NAFLD comprises a broad spectrum of liver-related disorders, including steatosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It affects almost 30% of adults in the general population and up to 70% of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), sharing common pathogenetic pathways with the latter. In addition, NAFLD is closely related to obesity, which acts in synergy with other predisposing conditions, including alcohol consumption, provoking progressive and insidious liver damage. Among the most potent risk factors for accelerating the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis or cirrhosis, diabetes stands out. Despite the rapid rise in NAFLD rates, identifying the optimal treatment remains a challenge. Interestingly, NAFLD amelioration or remission appears to be associated with a lower risk of T2DM, indicating that liver-centric therapies could reduce the risk of developing T2DM and vice versa. Consequently, assessing NAFLD requires a multidisciplinary approach to identify and manage this multisystemic clinical entity early. With the continuously emerging new evidence, innovative therapeutic strategies are being developed for the treatment of NAFLD, prioritizing a combination of lifestyle changes and glucose-lowering medications. Based on recent evidence, this review scrutinizes all practical and sustainable interventions to achieve a resolution of NAFLD through a multimodal approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To analyze whether prescription use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i in individuals with type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular disease (CVD) has increased after the ADA/EASD consensus guidelines (2018) in a German Real-World setting and which clinical characteristics are associated with prescription use of these drugs. Methods The Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA) comprises a representative panel of 1,373 general practitioners, diabetologists, and cardiologists throughout Germany (01/2015-12/2020: 12.6 million patients). Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n=45,531) was identified by ICD-10 codes (E11). Matching (1:1) on practice specialty, sex, age, and year of diabetes diagnosis was performed for CVD. Logistic regression models were fitted to obtain adjusted odds ratios (OR) for characteristics associated with prescription use (median follow-up: 1.9 years). Results Overall, 35% of patients (n=16,006) were treated with glucose-lowering drugs during the first year after type 2 diabetes diagnosis (HbA1c≥7.0%: 80%). GLP-1RA (2.4%) and SGLT2i (8.5%) were rarely prescribed. After the consensus, use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased, however, almost independently of pre-existing CVD (12/2019-11/2020 vs. 12/2017-11/2018: yes, no): GLP-1RA: from 5.7 to 9.2%, 5.2 to 7.6%; SGLT2i: from 13.9 to 20.4%, 12.1 to 16.6%. Among cardiovascular risk factors, the largest OR for GLP-1RA was for obesity (4.5; 95%CI: 3.2–6.3). CVD was moderately related with SGLT2i (1.45; 1.32–1.60) and GLP-1RA (1.35; 1.08–1.69) prescriptions. A weak association was observed between SGLT2i and heart failure (1.18; 95%CI: 1.05–1.32). Conclusion National prescription use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i did not come close to the recommendation in subjects with CVD issued by the 2018 ADA/EASD consensus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/Introduction: This study aimed to understand the characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non‐RCTs according to therapeutic regimens through systematic literature review. Materials and Methods: PubMed and the database of the Japanese Medical Abstract Society (ICHUSHI) were searched for studies published from 2010 to 2019 reporting the efficacy and safety of glucose‐lowering drugs in Japanese individuals with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes, and therapeutic regimens, demographics and clinical characteristics at the baseline were extracted. We evaluated the treatment arms, not the placebo arms. Results: The literature searches identified 2,656 publications, 145 of which met all eligibility criteria and included 282 eligible arms. In the past 10 years, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor was the most frequently studied in both RCTs and non‐RCTs. Regarding the characteristics of enrolled subjects, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist have been studied more in relatively obese subjects, and insulin has been studied in higher proportion of subjects with disease duration ≥10 years. Most of the RCTs included subjects aged 55–64 years, whereas a higher proportion of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor and insulin arms in the non‐RCTs included those aged ≥65 years. Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor were evaluated in subjects with no abnormalities in blood pressure or lipid parameters; however, only a few reports of those parameters have been assessed with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist and insulin. Conclusions: As RCTs and non‐RCTs differ in the baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects, it is necessary to integrate and evaluate both to understand the actual treatment status of type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetes overtreatment is a frequent and major issue in older people with type 2 diabetes but its definition is often inconsistent and may be misleading. This critical review has aimed at examining the definitions of diabetes overtreatment in older people used in research studies. Methods: Studies addressing diabetes overtreatment in people aged 65 or older were identified by searching the PubMed database according to an extensive search equation. Results: Twenty‐two research studies providing a definition of diabetes overtreatment in people aged were found. Overall, 12 different definitions of diabetes overtreatment were used. All studies defined overtreatment according to a HbA1c threshold (varying from <42 mmol/mol [<6.0%] to <64 mmol/mol [<8%]). Amongst them, 2 definitions had no consideration about glucose‐lowering (GL) treatment, 6 required the prescribing of ≥1 GL agent(s), and 4 the prescribing of ≥1 GL agent(s) inducing the high risk of hypoglycaemia (i.e., sulfonylurea(s) or insulin(s)). Only 4 definitions (four studies) were individualised, using varying HbA1c thresholds according to patients' age or health status. Conclusions: Definitions of diabetes overtreatment are heterogeneous across research studies, which is confusing. A standardised definition, based on the individual risk of hypoglycaemia and/or its complications must be promoted in order to bring clarity and greater insight into this field, as well as to improve the quality of management of diabetes in older patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Hispanic populations are more likely to develop diabetes and its related diseases than non‐Hispanic White populations. Little evidence exists to support whether the cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists are generalizable to the Hispanic populations. Methods and Results We included the cardiovascular and renal outcome trials (up to March 2021) that reported the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular death/hospitalization for heart failure, and composite renal outcomes by ethnicity in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using fixed‐effects models, and tested the differences between Hispanic and non‐Hispanic populations (P for interaction [Pinteraction]). In 3 sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor trials, there was a statistically significant difference between Hispanic (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54–0.91]) and non‐Hispanic (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.86–1.07]) groups in treatment effects on MACE risk (Pinteraction=0.03), except for risks of cardiovascular death/hospitalization for heart failure (Pinteraction=0.46) and composite renal outcome (Pinteraction=0.31). In 5 glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist trials, there was no statistically significant difference in treatment effect on MACE risk between Hispanic (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.70–0.96]) and non‐Hispanic (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84–1.00]) populations (Pinteraction=0.22). In 3 dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor trials, the HR for MACE risk appeared greater in Hispanic (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.98–1.35]) than non‐Hispanic (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88–1.04]) populations (Pinteraction=0.045). Conclusions Compared with non‐Hispanic individuals, Hispanic individuals with T2D appeared to obtain a greater benefit of lowered MACE risk with sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Background: Diabetic patients have an increased risk of bone fractures. Patients with type 1 DM are seven times more likely to suffer a fracture than those without DM, whereas those with type 2 DM are 1.3 times more likely to do so. Patients with T2DM have an increased risk for fractures, despite having a normal to increased bone mineral density, suggesting that other factors besides bone quantity must account for increased bone fragility. Objective: The aim of the current work was to assess fracture risk among diabetics who use glucose-lowering drugs. Methods: Fracture Risk, Glucose-Lowering Drugs, and diabetics were all looked for in PubMed, Google scholar, and ScienceDirect. References from relevant literature were also evaluated by the authors, but only the most recent or complete study from February 2016 to August 2022 was included. Due to the lack of sources for translation, documents in languages other than English have been ruled out. Papers that did not fall under the purview of major scientific investigations, such as unpublished manuscripts, oral presentations, conference abstracts, and dissertations, were omitted. Conclusion: Some of the newer glucose-lowering therapies for type 2 diabetes have been shown to improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes. However, treatments aimed at reducing glucose levels may potentially influence fractures risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis: The use of oral glucose-lowering drugs, particularly those designed to target the gut ecosystem, is often observed in association with altered gut microbial composition or functional capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The gut microbiota, in turn, plays crucial roles in the modulation of drug efficacy. We aimed to assess the impacts of acarbose and vildagliptin on human gut microbiota and the relationships between pre-treatment gut microbiota and therapeutic responses. Methods: This was a randomised, open-labelled, two-arm trial in treatment-naive type 2 diabetes patients conducted in Beijing between December 2016 and December 2017. One hundred participants with overweight/obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were recruited from the Pinggu Hospital and randomly assigned to the acarbose (n=50) or vildagliptin (n=50) group using sealed envelopes. The treatment period was 6 months. Blood, faecal samples and visceral fat data from computed tomography images were collected before and after treatments to measure therapeutic outcomes and gut microbiota. Metagenomic datasets from a previous type 2 diabetes cohort receiving acarbose or glipizide for 3 months were downloaded and processed. Statistical analyses were applied to identify the treatment-related changes in clinical variables, gut microbiota and associations. Results: Ninety-two participants were analysed. After 6 months of acarbose (n=44) or vildagliptin (n=48) monotherapy, both groups achieved significant reductions in HbA1c (from 60 to 46 mmol/mol [from 7.65% to 6.40%] in the acarbose group and from 59 to 44 mmol/mol [from 7.55% to 6.20%] in the vildagliptin group) and visceral fat areas (all adjusted p values for pre–post comparisons <0.05). Both arms showed drug-specific and shared changes in relative abundances of multiple gut microbial species and pathways, especially the common reductions in Bacteroidetes species. Three months and 6 months of acarbose-induced changes in microbial composition were highly similar in type 2 diabetes patients from the two independent studies. Vildagliptin treatment significantly enhanced fasting active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels. Baseline gut microbiota, rather than baseline GLP-1 levels, were strongly associated with GLP-1 response to vildagliptin, and to a lesser extent with GLP-1 response to acarbose. Conclusions/interpretation: This study reveals common microbial responses in type 2 diabetes patients treated with two glucose-lowering drugs targeting the gut differently and acceptable performance of baseline gut microbiota in classifying individuals with different GLP-1 responses to vildagliptin. Our findings highlight bidirectional interactions between gut microbiota and glucose-lowering drugs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02999841 Funding: National Key Research and Development Project: 2016YFC1304901. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Type 2 diabetes is more common in adults, but is becoming the major concern in children and adolescent recently. This study aimed to provide additional pharmaceutical management for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes by assessing the efficacy and safety of several glucoselowering drugs. Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov that reported the efficacy and safety of drugs for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Pooled effects were calculated by frequentist fixed effects network meta-analyses and additive network meta-analyses. Results: A total of 12 trials assessing eight glucose-lowering drugs were included, which compose of seven trials with monotherapy and five trials with combination therapies. Network meta-analysis results showed compared to placebo, saxagliptin+metformin (mean difference (MD) -1.91% [-2.85%, -0.97%]), liraglutide+metformin (MD -1.45% [-1.65%, -1.26%]), and liraglutide (MD -0.90% [-1.35%, -0.45%]) were the top 3 drugs that significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Sitagliptin+metformin, dapagliflozin, exenatide-2mcg, linagliptin-5mg, metformin, exenatide-5/10mcg, glimepiride, and sitagliptin also showed significant reduction in HbA1c. There were no significant differences between treatments in the incidence of adverse events, except that liraglutide+metformin had significant adverse effect such as abdominal pain. In addition, dapagliflozin, sitagliptin +metformin, and saxagliptin+metformin showed better efficacy compared with FDA-approved drugs. Conclusions: The top 10 treatments of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years were saxagliptin+metformin, liraglutide+metformin, liraglutide, dapagliflozin, exenatide-2 mcg, sitagliptin+metformin, linagliptin-5 mg, linagliptin-1 mg, metformin, and exenatide-5/10 mcg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveType 2 diabetes is more common in adults, but is becoming the major concern in children and adolescent recently. This study aimed to provide additional pharmaceutical management for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes by assessing the efficacy and safety of several glucose-lowering drugs.MethodsSearches were performed in PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov that reported the efficacy and safety of drugs for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Pooled effects were calculated by frequentist fixed effects network meta-analyses and additive network meta-analyses.ResultsA total of 12 trials assessing eight glucose-lowering drugs were included, which compose of seven trials with monotherapy and five trials with combination therapies. Network meta-analysis results showed compared to placebo, saxagliptin+metformin (mean difference (MD) -1.91% [-2.85%, -0.97%]), liraglutide+metformin (MD -1.45% [-1.65%, -1.26%]), and liraglutide (MD -0.90% [-1.35%, -0.45%]) were the top 3 drugs that significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Sitagliptin+metformin, dapagliflozin, exenatide-2mcg, linagliptin-5mg, metformin, exenatide-5/10mcg, glimepiride, and sitagliptin also showed significant reduction in HbA1c. There were no significant differences between treatments in the incidence of adverse events, except that liraglutide+metformin had significant adverse effect such as abdominal pain. In addition, dapagliflozin, sitagliptin+metformin, and saxagliptin+metformin showed better efficacy compared with FDA-approved drugs.ConclusionsThe top 10 treatments of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents aged 10–17 years were saxagliptin+metformin, liraglutide+metformin, liraglutide, dapagliflozin, exenatide–2 mcg, sitagliptin+metformin, linagliptin–5 mg, linagliptin–1 mg, metformin, and exenatide–5/10 mcg.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=284897, identifier CRD42021284897.

Background and Objective: Diabetes is a common metabolic disease that increases the risk of mortality of COVID-19. This study was done to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of COVID-19 in diabetic patients using different glucose-lowering drugs to find out the proper predictors of disease severity. Methods: 157 diabetic patients with confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled in three groups according to the antidiabetic medications used before admission (metformin, insulin and sulfonylurea). Findings: In 157 diabetic patients, the hospitalization length in the metformin group was lower than the no metformin group while duration of hospitalization and critical form of the disease in the insulin group were higher than the no insulin group. Furthermore, the levels of blood sugar, BUN, ALT and WBC were lower in the metformin group while ALP, ALT, BUN and creatinine levels were significantly higher in insulin group. In sulfonylurea group the levels of BUN and ALT were lower compared to the no sulfonylurea group. We also found that BUN and total bilirubin were the proper parameters to predict COVID-19 severity and mortality in metformin and insulin group respectively. Conclusion: It seems that the outcomes of renal function test, bilirubin and O2 saturation are important parameters to predict COVID-19 severity in diabetic patients using different antidiabetic medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs (thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) in patients with type 2 diabetes from randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on the treatment effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs on glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure metabolism published between Jan 2015 and April 2021. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 25 RCTs (2,843 participants). Overall, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and TZD significantly reduce fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas GLP-1 RA increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. Multispecies probiotics decrease FBS, total cholesterol (TC), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Moreover, subgroup analyses indicated that participants aged >55 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, longer duration of intervention, and subjects from Eastern countries, showed significantly higher reduction in FBS and HbA1c, TC, TG and SBP. This meta-analysis revealed that including multiple probiotic rather than glucose-lowering drugs might be more beneficial regarding T2D prevention who suffering from simultaneously hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most widespread chronic liver disease worldwide, confers a significant burden on health systems and leads to increased mortality and morbidity through several extrahepatic complications. NAFLD comprises a broad spectrum of liver-related disorders, including steatosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It affects almost 30% of adults in the general population and up to 70% of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), sharing common pathogenetic pathways with the latter. In addition, NAFLD is closely related to obesity, which acts in synergy with other predisposing conditions, including alcohol consumption, provoking progressive and insidious liver damage. Among the most potent risk factors for accelerating the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis or cirrhosis, diabetes stands out. Despite the rapid rise in NAFLD rates, identifying the optimal treatment remains a challenge. Interestingly, NAFLD amelioration or remission appears to be associated with a lower risk of T2DM, indicating that liver-centric therapies could reduce the risk of developing T2DM and vice versa. Consequently, assessing NAFLD requires a multidisciplinary approach to identify and manage this multisystemic clinical entity early. With the continuously emerging new evidence, innovative therapeutic strategies are being developed for the treatment of NAFLD, prioritizing a combination of lifestyle changes and glucose-lowering medications. Based on recent evidence, this review scrutinizes all practical and sustainable interventions to achieve a resolution of NAFLD through a multimodal approach.

Background: Insulin antibodies (IAs) affect blood glucose control in patients receiving insulin therapy., Aim: To investigate the relationship between different hypoglycemic treatments and IAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study included 1863 patients with T2DM who were receiving exogenous insulin therapy. All patients received stable antidiabetic therapy in the last 3 months and IA levels were measured using an iodine-125 array., Results: A total of 1863 patients were enrolled. There were 902 (48.4%) patients who had positive IAs (IA level > 5%), with a mean IA level of 11.06% (10.39%-11.72%). IA levels were positively correlated with high fasting blood glucose (odds ratio = 1.069, P < 0.001). The proportion of positive IAs was lowest in patients using glargine only (31.9%) and highest in patients using human insulin only (70.3%), P < 0.001. The IA levels in patients using sulfonylureas/glinides (8.3%), metformin (9.6%), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (8.2%) were all lower than in patients without these drugs (all P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Nearly half of patients on insulin therapy have positive IA antibodies, and IA antibody levels are associated with blood glucose control. Insulin glargine and a combination of oral glucose-lowering drugs were correlated with lower IA levels., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly increasing worldwide and its most critical determinant of morbidity and mortality is still represented by cardiovascular (CV) complications. For years, cardiologists' approach to diabetic patients has been focused on risk factors optimization, with positive results. However, the management of DM per se was never truly considered in order to obtain prevention from major CV events, because medications used for glycemic control were not expected to gain CV benefit. Early trials concerning intensive versus conventional glycemia control did not prove useful in reducing the number of CV events. The introduction of new molecules led to a game change in DM treatment, as some new glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), such as sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), showed not only to be safe but also to ensure CV benefit. A combination of anti-atherogenic effects and hemodynamic improvements are likely explanations of the observed reduction of CV events and mortality. These evidence opened a completely new era in the field of GLDs and of DM treatment. Nonetheless, the presence of residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal medical therapy remains an issue and an aggressive strategy against multiple risk factors is suggested. A paradigm shift toward a new approach to DM management should be made with no further delay with the use of medications that may prevent CV events in an integrated strategy of CV risk reduction. • Cardiovascular events remain the leading cause of mortality for diabetic patients. • New glucose-lowering drugs showed cardiovascular benefit in randomized trials. • New drugs remain underused and residual cardiovascular risk is still an issue. • An actual shift toward a comprehensive approach in diabetes is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective To assess incidence trends of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in Denmark and to examine HbA1c levels and glucose‐lowering drug use before and after hospitalization among individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Research Design and Methods We performed a population‐based study linking diagnosis, prescription and laboratory data. Standardized incidence of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in Denmark was assessed for each calendar year 1997–2017. HbA1c and glucose‐lowering drug use was compared with age‐ and sex‐matched diabetes comparisons without hospitalization for hypoglycaemia. Results The annual age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence rate of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia per 100,000 person‐years increased during 1997–2003 (from 17.7 to 30.3 per 100,000 person‐years), remained stable until 2010 (30.4) and gradually declined until 2017 (22.0). During this period, we identified 3,479 people with type 1 diabetes and 15,329 people with type 2 diabetes experiencing first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia. Both diabetes groups experienced a mean HbA1c decrease of ~12%–15% in the months preceding first hospitalization, followed by a gradually increasing HbA1c afterwards. People with type 1 diabetes and hospitalization used similar insulin therapies as those without hospitalization. People with type 2 diabetes and hospitalization more often received insulin (55%) than comparisons (45%), and 45% discontinued insulin or stopped all glucose‐lowering therapy after first hospitalization. Conclusions Incidence of hospitalizations for hypoglycaemia has declined by one fourth the last decade in the Danish population. A HbA1c decrease precedes first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes, and profound changes in glucose‐lowering drug therapy for type 2 diabetes occur after hospitalization.

In type 2 diabetes, anti-thrombotic management is challenging, and current anti-platelet agents have demonstrated reduced efficacy. Old and new anti-diabetic drugs exhibited—besides lowering blood glucose levels—direct and indirect effects on platelet function and on thrombotic milieu, eventually conditioning cardiovascular outcomes. The present review summarizes existing evidence on the effects of glucose-lowering agents on platelet properties, addressing pre-clinical and clinical research, as well as drug–drug interactions with anti-platelet agents. We aimed at expanding clinicians’ understanding by highlighting new opportunities for an optimal management of patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We suggest how an improvement of the thrombotic risk in this large population of patients may be achieved by a careful and tailored combination of anti-diabetic and anti-platelet therapies.

Objective: To assess incidence trends of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in Denmark and to examine HbA1c levels and glucose‐lowering drug use before and after hospitalization among individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: We performed a population‐based study linking diagnosis, prescription and laboratory data. Standardized incidence of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in Denmark was assessed for each calendar year 1997–2017. HbA1c and glucose‐lowering drug use was compared with age‐ and sex‐matched diabetes comparisons without hospitalization for hypoglycaemia. Results: The annual age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence rate of first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia per 100,000 person‐years increased during 1997–2003 (from 17.7 to 30.3 per 100,000 person‐years), remained stable until 2010 (30.4) and gradually declined until 2017 (22.0). During this period, we identified 3,479 people with type 1 diabetes and 15,329 people with type 2 diabetes experiencing first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia. Both diabetes groups experienced a mean HbA1c decrease of ~12%–15% in the months preceding first hospitalization, followed by a gradually increasing HbA1c afterwards. People with type 1 diabetes and hospitalization used similar insulin therapies as those without hospitalization. People with type 2 diabetes and hospitalization more often received insulin (55%) than comparisons (45%), and 45% discontinued insulin or stopped all glucose‐lowering therapy after first hospitalization. Conclusions: Incidence of hospitalizations for hypoglycaemia has declined by one fourth the last decade in the Danish population. A HbA1c decrease precedes first hospitalization for hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes, and profound changes in glucose‐lowering drug therapy for type 2 diabetes occur after hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is becoming one of the most common health problems in the elderly. Worldwide prevalence of DM among subjects over 65 years of age was 123 million in 2017, and it is expected that in 2045 the number of such persons will double. Elderly patients with DM have a higher risk of common geriatric syndromes, including frailty, cognitive impairment and dementia, urinary incontinence, traumatic falls and fractures, disability, side effects of polypharmacy, which have an important impact on quality of life and may interfere with anti-diabetic treatment. This analytical review of the li­terature discusses glycemic targets, as well as the best treatment options for elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on current international guidelines.

Purpose: A surge in the use of semaglutide injection (Ozempic ® ) approved to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) has led to a global supply shortage. We investigated contemporary user rates and clinical characteristics of semaglutide (Ozempic ® ) users in Denmark, and the extent of "off-label" prescribing for weight loss., Patients and Methods: Nationwide population-based cross-sectional study based on linked health registries January 2018 through December 2023. All adults who received a first prescription of semaglutide once weekly (Ozempic ® ) were included. We examined quarterly rates of new users and total user prevalences, using other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and weight loss medications as comparison. We also investigated user characteristics including T2D, glucose control, comedications, and cardiorenal disease., Results: The new user rate of semaglutide (Ozempic ® ) remained stable at approximately 4 per 1000 adult person-years between 2019 and 2021 and then accelerated, peaking at 10 per 1000 in the first quarter of 2023 after which it declined sharply. User prevalence increased to 91,626 users in Denmark in 2023. The proportion of semaglutide (Ozempic ® ) new users who had a record of T2D declined from 99% in 2018 to only 67% in 2022, increasing again to 87% in 2023. Among people with T2D who initiated semaglutide (Ozempic ® ) in 2023, 52% received antidiabetic polytherapy before initiation, 39% monotherapy, and 8% no antidiabetic therapy. Most T2D initiators had suboptimal glucose control, with 83% having an HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol and 68% ≥53 mmol/mol despite use of antidiabetic medication, and 29% had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or kidney disease., Conclusion: The use of semaglutide (Ozempic ® ) in Denmark has increased dramatically. Although not approved for weight loss without T2D, one-third of new users in 2022 did not have T2D. Conversely, most initiators with T2D had a clear medical indication for treatment intensification, and "off-label" use can only explain a minor part of the supply shortage., Competing Interests: Professor Anton Pottegård reports grants from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Professor Jens Søndergaard reports grants from Roche Diagnostics, AstraZeneca a/s; personal fees from Novo Nordisk a/s, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics a/s, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Mailhac et al.)

Purpose of Review: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased fracture risk. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of different classes of glucose-lowering drugs on fracture risk in patients with type 2 DM. The heterogeneity of the included studies did not allow formal statistical analyses. Recent Findings: Sixty studies were included in the review. Metformin, dipeptidylpeptidase-IV inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors do not appear to increase fracture risk. Results for insulin and sulphonylureas were more disparate, although there may be an increased fracture risk related to hypoglycemia and falls with these treatments. Glitazones were consistently associated with increased fracture risk in women, although the evidence was sparser in men. Summary: New glucose-lowering drugs are continuously being developed and better understanding of these is leading to changes in prescription patterns. Our findings warrant continued research on the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on fracture risk, elucidating the class-specific effects of these drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Previous epidemiologic studies indicate an increased risk of cancer and cancer mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether the resolution of hyperglycemia will lead to reduced risk of neoplasm in T2D remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between glycemic control and incidence of neoplasm in T2D patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in T2D with significant HbA1c reduction difference between intensive/active and standard/control groups plus follow-up ≥48 weeks were included and analyzed by fixed-effect models, random-effect model, and meta-regression analysis accordingly. Results: Overall, 52 studies were included. Compared with standard/control treatment, intensive/active treatment led to significantly greater HbA1c reduction from baseline (WMD = −0.51%, 95% CI, −0.55 to −0.46%, P < 0.001), but was not associated with a decreased incidence of neoplasm (OR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.94–1.03, I2 = 2%) in T2D. Meta-regression analysis indicated that HbA1c reduction difference between intensive/active treatment and standard/control treatment was not associated with the incidence of neoplasm in T2D patients (β = −0.0011, 95% CI, −0.0058 to 0.0035, P = 0.625). In neoplasm-site subgroup analysis, a decreased incidence of breast neoplasm was observed in T2D patients using dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor (OR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.35–0.89, I2 = 0%) and incidence of prostate neoplasm was reduced in T2D patients with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment (OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.47–0.91, I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Improved glycemic control in short and medium periods achieved by existing glucose-lowering drugs or strategies may not confer reduced risk of neoplasm in patients with T2D. Studies with longer follow-up duration are needed to better elucidate the long-period effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Renal failure is a contraindication for some glucose-lowering drugs and requires dosage adjustment for others, particularly biguanides, sulfonylureas, and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4. In this study, we assessed adherence to prescription recommendations for glucose-lowering drugs according to renal function in hospitalized diabetic subjects. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was carried out over a 2-year period in a university hospital. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined by averaging all measurements performed during hospitalization. Glucose-lowering drug dosages were analyzed according to the recommendations of the relevant medical societies. Results: In total, 2071 diabetic patients (53% hospitalized in cardiology units) were examined. GFR was 2 in 13.4% of these patients, 30–44 in 15.1%, 45–60 in 18.3%, and >60 in 53.3%. Inappropriate oral glucose-lowering treatments were administered to 273 (13.2%) patients, including 53 (2.6%) with a contraindication. In cardiology units, 53.1% and 14.3% of patients had GFRs of 2, respectively, and 179 (15.4%) patients had a contraindication or were prescribed an excessive dose of glucose-lowering drugs. Conclusions: We showed that the burden of inappropriate prescriptions is high in diabetic patients. Given the high number of patients receiving these medications, particularly in cardiology units, a search for potential adverse effects related to these drugs should be performed.

The age-related decrease in skeletal muscle mass together with the loss of muscle power and function is defined sarcopenia. Mounting evidence suggests that the prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and different mechanisms may be responsible for this association such as impaired insulin sensitivity, chronic hyperglycemia, advanced glycosylation end products, subclinical inflammation, microvascular and macrovascular complications. Glucose-lowering drugs prescribed for patients with T2DM might impact on these mechanisms leading to harmful or beneficial effect on skeletal muscle. Importantly, beyond their glucose-lowering effects, glucose-lowering drugs may affect per se the equilibrium between protein anabolism and catabolism through several mechanisms involved in skeletal muscle physiology, contributing to sarcopenia. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an update on the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on sarcopenia in individuals with T2DM, focusing on the parameters used to define sarcopenia: muscle strength (evaluated by handgrip strength), muscle quantity/quality (evaluated by appendicular lean mass or skeletal muscle mass and their indexes), and physical performance (evaluated by gait speed or short physical performance battery). Furthermore, we also describe the plausible mechanisms by which glucose-lowering drugs may impact on sarcopenia.

Mikkel Z Ankarfeldt,1,2 Brian L Thorsted,1 Rolf HH Groenwold,2,3 Erpur Adalsteinsson,1 M Sanni Ali,2–4 Olaf H Klungel2,3 1Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark; 2Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 3Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 4Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Background: Channeling bias may occur when a newly marketed drug and an established drug, despite similar indications, are prescribed to patients with different prognostic characteristics (ie, confounding).Aim: To investigate channeling bias and its impact on relative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs versus basal insulin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) versus sulfonylurea.Methods: In the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, patients with type 2 diabetes initiating treatment between 2006 and 2015 were included. Analyses were stratified by years since first prescription of GLP-1 and DPP-4i, respectively. The characteristics of GLP-1 versus insulin and DPP-4i versus sulfonylurea initiators were compared over time. After propensity score matching, the relative effectiveness regarding 6-month changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight was estimated.Results: In total, 8,398 GLP-1, 14,807 insulin, 24,481 DPP-4i, and 33,505 sulfonylurea initiators were identified. No major channeling was observed. Considerable overlap in distributions of characteristics allowed for propensity score-matched analyses. Relative effectiveness was similar across time. The overall relative effect of GLP-1 versus insulin showed no difference for HbA1c and relative increase in body weight (3.57 kg [95% confidence interval {CI}: 3.21, 3.92]) for insulin. The overall relative effect of DPP-4i versus sulfonylurea showed relative decrease in HbA1c (–0.34% [95% CI: –0.38, –0.30]) and increase in body weight (1.58 kg [95% CI: 1.38, 1.78]) for sulfonylurea.Conclusion: No major channeling was identified in the investigated glucose-lowering drugs. Relative effectiveness could be estimated already in the first year after launch and was consistent in the years thereafter. Keywords: channelling bias, channeling bias, glucose-lowering drugs, DPP-4i, GLP-1, type 2 diabetes, observational study, relative effectiveness